<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Food Psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/food_psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Humans reveal dark side in turtle experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/humans_reveal_dark_side_in_turtle_experiment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/humans_reveal_dark_side_in_turtle_experiment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turtles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal cruelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An undergraduate project found drivers would purposely swerve to run over turtles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An unnerving number of people swerve in order to kill small animals when driving, according to the findings of a student at South Carolina's Clemson University. As the <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_RUNNING_OVER_TURTLES?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2012-12-27-15-04-19">AP reported,</a> Nathan Weaver, 22, inadvertently witnessed the sadism in action when he placed rubber turtles on a busy road and observed as part of a project intended to help box turtles -- a species in the decline -- to safely cross the road. One in 50 cars purposefully aimed to kill the fake creature -- which, Weaver noted, is a significant number given that a real turtle can take around 10 minutes to cross the street.</p><p>"This was a bit shocking," said the student.</p><p>According to the AP, Weaver's observations align with a study by Western Carolina University psychology professor Hal Herzog, who found that 34 people out of his class of 100 had intentionally run over a turtle or been in a car with someone who had at some point. Two-thirds of those who admitted this were male.</p><p>"They aren't thinking, really. It is not something people think about. It just seems fun at the time," Herzog said. "It is the dark side of human nature."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/humans_reveal_dark_side_in_turtle_experiment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/humans_reveal_dark_side_in_turtle_experiment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gwyneth Paltrow prefers crack to canned cheese</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/gwyneth_paltrow_canned_cheese_crack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/gwyneth_paltrow_canned_cheese_crack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/07/08/gwyneth_paltrow_canned_cheese_crack</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Joan Crawford of the kitchen talks drugs, alcohol and the ultimate danger to her children -- McDonald's]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything in moderation, especially moderation. That was the truism passed down to me from my father when we would turn into the McDonald's drive-thru and order our occasional Big Macs and Happy Meals. And despite what macrobiotic mommy dearest Gwyneth Paltrow might think, I somehow grew up without any Mc'Deformities.</p><p>During a conversation with former BBC host Jonathan Ross for the iTunes Festival earlier this week, Gwyneth confessed that she never let her kids pass through the Golden Arches, something that shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who hears the self-confessed "foodie" talk about her healthy culinary home.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/gwyneth_paltrow_canned_cheese_crack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/08/gwyneth_paltrow_canned_cheese_crack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How comfort foods work like Prozac</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/comfort_food_psychology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/comfort_food_psychology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2011/06/23/comfort_food_psychology</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The psychology behind why we turn to fatty staples like French fries and fried chicken when life gets rough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the recession hit, you could hear the words buzzing from the cell phones of every restaurant consultant in America: "It's time for comfort food." But under the mashed potatoes and meatloaf lies a question: What does "comfort food" really mean? What about it actually <em>comforts</em> us?</p><p><a href="http://www.gilttaste.com"><img class='wp-image-10019533' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/06/ID_giltTaste1.gif' /></a>Let's look at some big-time comfort foods: Fried chicken. French fries. Chocolate cake. When people talk about comfort food, the obvious explanation is that it's all about nostalgia and missing Mommy. But that's also cultural. Look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lutefisk">lutefisk</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natt%C5%8D">natto</a> and the reddish-black <a href="http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.mightysweet.com/mesohungry/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/02-Blood-Sausage-at-Georges.jpg&amp;imgrefurl=http://www.mightysweet.com/mesohungry/2009/08/17/georges-blood-sausage/&amp;usg=__XWC_yw05ZU2rpQ5OGXFwD6IPO1E=&amp;h=480&amp;w=640&amp;sz=82&amp;hl=en&amp;start=0&amp;zoom=1&amp;tbnid=PNh6KYMMn3JbjM:&amp;tbnh=143&amp;tbnw=189&amp;ei=e9b7TcrCJZLpgQe9rq3wCg&amp;prev=/search%3Fq%3Dblood%2Bsausage%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D739%26tbm%3Disch&amp;um=1&amp;itbs=1&amp;iact=hc&amp;vpx=312&amp;vpy=456&amp;dur=2502&amp;hovh=194&amp;hovw=259&amp;tx=196&amp;ty=175&amp;page=1&amp;ndsp=18&amp;ved=1t:429,r:13,s:0&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=739">blood sausage</a> I was served once by a sad Belgian who took comfort in what struck me as something you might see in a hospital. And really, it takes more than this to create the rush of sensations that make us feel safe, calm and cared for. It's a complex interplay of memory, history and brain chemistry, and while some basics apply -- most of us are soothed by the soft, sweet, smooth, salty and unctuous -- the specifics are highly personal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/comfort_food_psychology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/comfort_food_psychology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Freaky Eaters&#8217;&#8221; JJ Virgin on shock therapy and french fries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/freaky_eaters_jj_virgin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/freaky_eaters_jj_virgin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/20/freaky_eaters_jj_virgin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We spoke to the TLC show's nutritionist about the science of food addiction -- and her "shock therapy" approach]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ Virgin has one of the stranger jobs out there: After spending 25 years studying health and fitness, she now spends her time on TLC, turning around the lives of food addicts on "Freaky Eaters." (No, that's not the show about people who eat laundry soap, a similar program on the same network called "My Super Strange Addiction.") "Freaky Eaters" documents the life of a person addicted to a certain type of edible food -- french fries, meat, and corn syrup have all been on the menu -- as well as their recovery with the help of two specialists, Virgin and Dr. Mike Dow.</p><p>We spoke to JJ Virgin over the phone about what qualifies someone to be a "freaky eater," as well as some of the more extreme measures they've taken on the program to make people confront their dangerous life choices.</p><p>     <strong>This is the second season of the show, and there has been a lot of controversy about programs similar to "Freaky Eaters," like "Hoarders" and "Intervention." Some people are wondering if putting these people up on screen is helpful or just exploitative. What is your response to that sort of claim?</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/freaky_eaters_jj_virgin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/freaky_eaters_jj_virgin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>911 called over botched Chinese food order</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you do when your dinner isn't delivered properly? Call the police, of course]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times has this happened to you? You go home and try to enjoy a nice dinner of Chinese food delivery. But when your meal arrives, they've got the order completely wrong!</p><p>Do you:</p><p><strong>A)</strong>	Call back the restaurant and ask for a refund;</p><p><strong>B)</strong>	Just eat the food and promise to deal with it next time;</p><p><strong>C)</strong>	Call the police</p><p>If you answered C, you are not alone. A woman in Savannah, Ga., called 911 to <a href="http://gawker.com/5812001/woman-calls-911-because-she-got-the-wrong-chinese-food">rectify her dinner order</a> yesterday. This was the result:</p><p>     <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ByR1HyhkofE" width="425"></iframe>   </p><p>&#160;</p><p>Sadly, these kinds of calls aren't as uncommon as you might think. In March 2009 a woman called the police after being given <a href="http://news.foodfacts.info/2009/03/now-911-call-over-mcnuggets.html">the wrong order of McNuggets at McDonald's</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The five most ridiculous defenses of Ronald McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/18/ronald_mcdonald_creepy_retire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/18/ronald_mcdonald_creepy_retire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/18/ronald_mcdonald_creepy_retire</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A watchdog group is calling for the clown mascot's retirement, but is being creepy grounds for firing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McDonald's is under attack again for force-feeding our nation's children greasy, delicious fries. A group called Corporate Accountability International took out full-page ads today in several prominent newspapers, titled "<a href="http://www.lettertomcdonalds.org/about">Doctor's Orders: Stop Marketing Junk Food to Children.</a>"</p><p>And while this grievance might not seem new, exactly, CAI <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703509104576329610340358394.html">is launching another campaign on Thursday</a> against Ronald McDonald himself, whom the watchdog group called a "Deep Fried Joe Camel." They claim Ronald's the equivalent of a drug pusher for MSG-addicted kids.</p><p>But how "friendly" is Ronald? <a href="http://gawker.com/5803002/survey-says-ronald-mcdonald-is-creepy">A new study</a> done by outside marketing group Ace Metric found that in a survey group of 500, an overwhelming amount found a guy with big red lips and white greasepaint more creepy than cute.</p><p>McDonald's refuses to give up on Ronald, though, and its defense on why it needs to keep a terrifying clown as its mascot would be charming if it weren't so ridiculous and backward. Below, five of the responses McDonald's has given for keeping Ronald on the payroll.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/18/ronald_mcdonald_creepy_retire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/18/ronald_mcdonald_creepy_retire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natalie Portman quits veganism. Good for her</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/natalie_portman_vegan_vegetarian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/natalie_portman_vegan_vegetarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Knighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegetarianism and veganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/04/11/natalie_portman_vegan_vegetarian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The starlet caused a fuss when she embraced the strict diet. Now, pregnant, she's turning her back on it. Why not?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2009, Natalie Portman read Jonathan Safran Foer's book "Eating Animals" and turned vegan. Not just any vegan, though. The kind of vegan where you feel the need to make an announcement on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/natalie-portman/jonathan-safran-foers-iea_b_334407.html">the Huffington Post</a> about it, and because you are Natalie Portman, people will read it and be like "Totally," when you talk about how you educated your less knowledgeable friends (at Harvard) about how "they had never truly thought about the connection between their environmental conditions and their food."</p><p>I am all for veganism, vegetarianism, whatever, but I am also a big fan of "live and let live" mentality. I also don't like to be given health advice by someone who lost so much weight on her last film that people were <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/natalie-portman-loses-20-pounds-gwyneth-paltrow-gains/story?id=12303982">legitimately scared for her well-being</a>. Let's just say, I would <a href="http://justjared.buzznet.com/2008/02/13/natalie-portman-vegan-shoes-2/">not buy that person's brand of vegan shoes</a>, because there are a lot of shoes out there that are technically "vegan" (i.e., not leather) and <a href="http://www.zimbio.com/Natalie+Portman/articles/ETFZJJQvRTX/natalie+portman+vegan+shoes">do not cost $355</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/natalie_portman_vegan_vegetarian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/natalie_portman_vegan_vegetarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the rise of food prices all bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/rising_food_prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/rising_food_prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2011/03/31/rising_food_prices</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outrage abounds over a report that companies are shrinking portions but not prices, but it might be good for us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slayers of elitists and other warriors of the downtrodden: Look! I bare my throat to you, fleshy and fat and ripe for the kill. But before you draw your blade, let's talk about this for a minute. Is the increasing cost of food in America an entirely bad thing?</p><p>A <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/29/business/29shrink.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;hp">recent report in the New York Times</a> announced that American grocery store "shoppers are paying the same amount, but getting less," and proceeded to quote a woman whose three-box pasta dinner for her large family didn't quite satisfy. She only later realized it was because those boxes now contain 13.5 ounces of noodles, not 16.</p><p>The report goes on to catalog other shrinkages: cans of tuna going from 6 ounces to 5; buckets of ice cream going from 2 liters to 1 &#189;; orange juice from 64 ounces to 59, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/rising_food_prices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/rising_food_prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The squirmy ethics of breast milk ice cream</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/twisted_ethics_of_breast_milk_ice_cream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/twisted_ethics_of_breast_milk_ice_cream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/03/10/twisted_ethics_of_breast_milk_ice_cream</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the blogs fume and Lady Gaga threatens to sue, we look at why a little scoop is causing such a big roar]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When London-based ice cream maker Matt O'Connor launched "Baby Gaga," a flavor made with human breast milk, he was hoping to start a conversation.</p><p>"I come from a family of Irish dairy farmers," he said. "We used to milk the cows every morning at 5 a.m., and keep impregnating them every five months so they would keep producing milk. That was floating around in my head -- why are human breasts sexualized, rather than being seen as biological feeding instruments?"</p><p>After he nearly sold out his first batch in a single day in late February, he found himself having a conversation with a Westminster Council health inspection team, who whisked the last few scoops off the shelves for safety testing (it was since deemed safe and will be back on sale shortly). Now he's conversing with Lady Gaga's lawyers, who have threatened an injunction for copyright infringement, an action he <a href="http://blog.theicecreamists.com/">compared</a> to the behavior of a "playground bully or despotic dictators like Colonel Gaddafi or Robert Mugabe [rather] than an artist celebrating artistic freedom."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/twisted_ethics_of_breast_milk_ice_cream/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/twisted_ethics_of_breast_milk_ice_cream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Easy-Bake Oven loses its soul</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/easy_bake_oven_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/easy_bake_oven_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2011/02/24/easy_bake_oven_change</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal ban on incandescent light bulbs won't doom the bulb-powered toy for good. But it will hurt its spirit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first: Rumors of the death of the Easy-Bake Oven are greatly exaggerated. Rumbling through the Internets yesterday were worries that the federal ban on incandescent light bulbs, due to kick in next year, meant that everyone's favorite bulb-powered childhood burn hazard was doomed. Happily, Hasbro announced that the Easy-Bake Oven would be reborn, all Phoenix-like, as the Easy-Bake Ultimate Oven. Only this time it's going to be fired with some zippy little heating element, which means that some kid somewhere is going to be very unhappy when his parents rip the thing apart insisting that they can change the bulb themselves.</p><p>But is all truly saved? Surely the phase-out of incandescent bulbs is good for the world -- I mean, that a 100-watt bulb was so inefficient at turning energy into light that it could cook a cake as a byproduct is sort of its own argument against itself. Still, I can't help feeling a little something may be lost with the change.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/easy_bake_oven_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/easy_bake_oven_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The next diet fad: Imagine yourself pigging out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/imagine_diet_carey_morewedge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/imagine_diet_carey_morewedge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/12/15/imagine_diet_carey_morewedge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychologists discover that food porn can make you calorie-chaste, if you can stand to stare at it for long enough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Psychologists at Carnegie Mellon, led by the excellently named Carey Morewedge, just published a study in <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/330/6010/1530.short">Science</a> demonstrating the Mother of All Ironies: that if you imagine yourself eating something, you <em>can actually curb your appetite for it</em>. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/science/14tier.html?_r=2&amp;src=dayp&amp;pagewanted=all">Coining it the "Imagine Diet,"</a> New York Times science writer John Tierney has come across what could be his brilliant exit strategy from the paper: Publish a book of pictures of fried chicken and chocolate cake with some meditative instructions, and boom! Set sailing on his new yacht.</p><p>First, he'll have to get over the resistance to this counter-intuitive notion and the anger of the six or seven still-employed magazine food editors in America. I mean, isn't the whole point of food porn to make you drool in your lap and want to tear into a pot pie? Yes, Tierney explains, but there's a difference between the psychological phenomena of "sensitization," which is when picturing that hot, steamy pot pie makes you want it, and "habituation," which is when you get over that desire, satisfying it. What Carey Morewedge (I find it impossible to not say his full name) found was that people can bypass their desire and trigger habituation to food. But to do so, you can't just imagine having it in front of you; that leads to sensitization. You have to really, concertedly imagine yourself in the process of eating it. A bunch of it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/imagine_diet_carey_morewedge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/imagine_diet_carey_morewedge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What it&#8217;s like to eat only potatoes for 60 days, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/chris_voigt_potato_guy_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/chris_voigt_potato_guy_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/12/07/chris_voigt_potato_guy_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Checking in with the man who gave his body and lost his mind to tubers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <a href="http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/10/28/chris_voigt_potato_diet">we last left our hero</a>/culinary guinea pig <a href="http://20potatoesaday.com/blog.php">Chris Voigt, executive director of the Washington State Potato Commission</a>, he was nearly halfway done with his 60-day all-potato diet, a feat intended to demonstrate the vast nutritional powers of the potato. Because if there's something that will sell you on a food, it's some guy going, "Watch me eat tons of this all the time and not die!"</p><p>Even after a month he was energetic and spry, with remarkably lower cholesterol, but, as you might expect, matters of the body and matters of the mind are not so simple. That is to say, he was going bonkers from eating nothing but seven pounds of potatoes each day, desperately finding no-calorie ways to flavor them and hitting bottom when he stole a co-worker's packets of <em>Taco Bell hot sauce</em>. He posted on his blog distressing cries for help like, "One of those days where you really wonder what the heck you're doing. While I know I love potatoes, it was hard to keep eating them. I hung in there but I was the star of my own little pity party yesterday."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/chris_voigt_potato_guy_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/chris_voigt_potato_guy_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why airplane dining has always been awful</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/why_airplane_food_sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/why_airplane_food_sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/11/11/why_airplane_food_sucks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think airline food is bad now, you should have seen it in its "glory" days]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airplane food has been a punchline for so long that it's almost shocking to remember that it used to be a striking symbol of class. It was the meal with the flavor of a remade world, a globe suddenly shrunken, an awe-inspiring update of the glorious days of ocean liners and trans-continental railroad dining cars, all big wines and beefsteaks, but, magically, <em>thousands of feet in the air.</em></p><p>It's a history that seems to ring hollow, though, when you're cramped in coach, eating your packet of sorry peanuts and considering whether it's worth the eight bucks for a cardboardy chicken wrap. But those in the know remember a different time, like <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot/">Patrick Smith</a>, author of <a href="http://WWW.ASKTHEPILOT.COM">"Ask the Pilot</a>," who recalls: "My very first airplane flight was in coach, an hour-long domestic flight in 1974. They served hot sandwiches and a cheesecake dessert," a far cry from pretzel dust and <a href="http://www.salon.com/food/sacrificial_lam/index.html?story=/food/francis_lam/2010/11/09/best_airplane_snack_biscoff">two more cookies you wish you could ask for</a>. So what happened?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/why_airplane_food_sucks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/11/why_airplane_food_sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is what it&#8217;s like to eat only potatoes for 60 days</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/chris_voigt_potato_diet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/chris_voigt_potato_diet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/10/28/chris_voigt_potato_diet</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man does an extreme diet to prove the nutritional value of spuds. But he's losing his mind]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First there were hunger strikes to protest brutal injustices. Then there was "Super Size Me," an all-McDonald's regimen captured on film to show us what fast food is doing to us. But now Chris Voigt is bringing the extreme diet noise to &#8230; promoting potato sales.</p><p>For 60 days, all the executive director of the Washington State Potato Commission will eat are potatoes, seven pounds a day of them, to demonstrate that potatoes are so nutritionally whole that you can live off them for months. Sure, his body might live, but what about his mind and spirit? I don't know, but when <a href="http://eater.com/archives/2010/10/27/shocker-man-regrets-all-potato-stunt-diet.php">our friends at Eater.com</a> referred to <a href="http://20potatoesaday.com/blog.php">Voigt's potato-diet blog</a> as a document of "an increasingly broken and desperate man," well, we had to take a look at the slow-motion car crash.</p><p>He's nearly halfway through his challenge, which began on Oct. 1, and reading his posts is a little like reading diaries from the Donner Party, eerie announcements from a mental state slipping further and further away. It's amazing. We've combed through his record (sorry, there are no links to individual posts) to help tell his story (in a form edited for space). Enjoy, and maybe shed a tear for Chris Voigt.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/chris_voigt_potato_diet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/chris_voigt_potato_diet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School cafeterias to try psychology in lunch line</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/us_school_lunches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/us_school_lunches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/12/us_school_lunches</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department of Agriculture spends $2 million on techniques aimed at convincing children to choose healthy foods]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal officials are turning to psychology in a new approach to get kids to choose healthier foods in the school lunch line.</p><p>The U.S. Department of Agriculture is giving $2 million to food behavior scientists to use marketing tricks to encourage kids to pick fruits and veggies over cookies and french fries.</p><p>Some of the ideas include hiding chocolate milk behind plain milk, putting the salad bar near checkout, placing fruit in pretty baskets and accepting only cash as payment for desserts.</p><p>Studies by Cornell University researchers have found these tactics work, and Cornell will start a new child nutrition center to test more of these methods.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/us_school_lunches/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/12/us_school_lunches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York hopes to ban spending food stamps on soda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/us_food_stamps_sugary_drinks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/us_food_stamps_sugary_drinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/07/us_food_stamps_sugary_drinks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If approved, it would be the first time an item would be banned from the federal program based solely on nutrition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Yorkers on food stamps would not be allowed to spend them on sugar-sweetened drinks under an obesity-fighting proposal being floated by Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Gov. David Paterson.</p><p>Bloomberg and Paterson planned to announce Thursday that they are seeking permission from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the nation's food stamp program, to add sugary drinks to the list of prohibited goods for city residents receiving assistance.</p><p>If approved, it would be the first time an item would be banned from the federal program based solely on nutritional value.</p><p>The idea has been suggested previously, including in 2008 in Maine, where it drew criticism from advocates for the poor who argued it unfairly singled out low-income people and risked scaring off potential needy recipients.</p><p>And in 2004 the USDA rejected Minnesota's plan to ban junk food, including soda and candy, from food stamp purchases, saying it would violate the Food Stamp Act's definition of what is food and could create "confusion and embarrassment" at the register.</p><p>In New York, a proposal to adopt a penny-per-ounce tax on sweetened soda failed to get out of the state Legislature earlier this year; Bloomberg backed the state proposal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/us_food_stamps_sugary_drinks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/us_food_stamps_sugary_drinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How has gluten-free become so popular?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/us_fea_food_gluten_free_boom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/us_fea_food_gluten_free_boom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Allergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/16/us_fea_food_gluten_free_boom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quarter of U.S. adults are reducing their intake of the protein, even though only 1 percent cannot tolerate it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwyneth Paltrow gushes over gluten-free. Chelsea Clinton's wedding cake was baked without it. The new Old Spice guy avoids the ubiquitous protein to help stay buff. In fact, odds are good you too have tried -- or at least encountered -- a product with the gluten removed.</p><p>Because gluten-free is what low-carb was a decade ago: The "it" diet discussed on daytime talk shows, promoted by hyper-slim actresses and adopted by masses. Grocery aisles are stocked with the likes of gluten-free pasta, crackers, cereal and beer.</p><p>Americans are enthusiastically exiling a dietary staple that wasn't even in most people's vocabulary a decade ago.</p><p>But why?</p><p>Unlike some other dietary boogeymen like trans-fats, gluten is not inherently bad to eat. Only a small percentage of people can't tolerate the protein, which occurs naturally in wheat, barley and rye. Plus, banning gluten from your diet can be really hard.</p><p>Not only is gluten an essential element of traditional breads and pastas (it's the protein that gives them their structure), it often is used as a thickening agent in processed foods, such as ketchup and ice cream. And cutting out gluten is no guarantee of weight loss.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/us_fea_food_gluten_free_boom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/us_fea_food_gluten_free_boom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our national love affair with food on sticks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/03/food_on_sticks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/03/food_on_sticks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/09/03/food_on_sticks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A retrospective of this year's state-fair portable-snack arms race, and theories on why we can't get enough of it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that state fair season, aka summer, is drawing to a close, let us look back at the months-long joust between fairs from Minnesota to Texas, and the rough rivalries therein, vying every year for the title of Craziest Things on Sticks Meant for Human Consumption.</p><p>Texas -- whose specialty is fried anything -- put on a spectacular showing this year of pure greasy audacity. The <a href="http://eater.com/archives/2010/08/25/state-fair-of-texas-deep-fry-it-all.php">Texans took an innocuous salad</a>, added cheese, ham and bacon, deep fried it and impaled it on a skewer. If there were a prize for impudence, Texas would be an obvious shoo-in.</p><p>But this year's overall winner would have to be Wisconsin. What it lacked in cheek, it made up for in creativity. Ponder, if you will, the gravity-defying genius of the <a href="http://www.wistatefair.com/10_web/food/food_stick.html">Irish-stew-on-a-stick</a>. Not to be flummoxed by the unstickworthiness of the myriad vegetable and meat components of a stew, vendor Slim McGinn's created a pastry shell, stuffed it with braised lamb (and we're guessing veggies), and presented it to us on a stick. Sheer brilliance! Other vendors offered frozen grapes on a stick, spaghetti and meatballs on a stick, and deep-fried cream cheese and bacon on a stick. How's that for good old Midwestern gumption?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/03/food_on_sticks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/03/food_on_sticks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horse as main course</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/eating_horse_mongolia_ext2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/eating_horse_mongolia_ext2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International cuisine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/08/18/eating_horse_mongolia_ext2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to Mongolia wanting to taste the sacred animal, but there's a lesson beyond flavor in forbidden food]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a child, the closest I got to horses was a coin-operated mustang in the grocery store. I was mostly indifferent to them, boyhood cowboy phase excepted, until a history professor described the Mongol armies that dominated Asia. Horsemen with a string of mounts pressed at unprecedented speed across impossible territory. They struck quickly, baiting opposing armies into outrunning their own supply lines and their discipline. When the Mongols moved separate from their own herds, they rotated horses to keep them fresh, opened veins to drink horse blood, and culled the weakest for food.</p><p>The Mongols were brutal and pragmatic and mobile. I was self-indulgent and listless, but now suddenly obsessed with their stories. When I arrived in Mongolia as a Peace Corps volunteer two years later, it was with a rucksack full of romance, too little long underwear, and a hunger. Mongolians ate horses, and I wanted to join them. I wanted to ingest some <em>history</em> and <em>culture</em>. Perhaps I did a little too much reading.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/eating_horse_mongolia_ext2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/eating_horse_mongolia_ext2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is America so fixed on food fads?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/02/america_food_fads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/02/america_food_fads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food traditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/08/02/america_food_fads</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summer's flings include popsicles, cakeballs and macarons. But what makes us such promiscuous eaters?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/dining/28united.html">announced</a> that the Korean taco was going to be the next big thing riding into the East Coast, white-hot from its domination of Los Angeles -- another episode in America's passionate love affair with faddy foods. This summer's flings include the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/dining/05popsicles.html">popsicle</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/04/16/cake_balls">cakeballs</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2010/03/02/faddy_food_macarons">macarons</a>, heirs apparent to the cupcake. And that, of course, doesn't include a host of other nutritional and diet fads (the <a href="http://www.alternet.org/food/145539/the_newest_diet_trend%3A_what_would_jesus_eat/?page=entire">hallelujah diet</a> or <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/12/tyra-banks-show-tapeworm-diet.html">ingesting a tapeworm</a>, anybody?).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/02/america_food_fads/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/02/america_food_fads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
