<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Food safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/food_safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When antibiotics no longer work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/salmonella_turkey_recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/salmonella_turkey_recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/04/salmonella_turkey_recall</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists fear the growth of "super-bugs" in livestock, and worry that meat recalls could become much more common]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be nothing more viscerally unsettling than the idea that our&#160;food is tainted and could make us seriously ill. Those anxieties were&#160;stoked this morning when Cargill, the third-largest turkey producer in&#160;the country, announced the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/04/business/cargill-recalls-ground-turkey-linked-to-salmonella-outbreak.html?_r=1">recall of 36 million pounds of poultry</a>&#160;for fear of salmonella contamination. The scare was precipitated by&#160;an outbreak in California -- which left at least one person&#160;dead and more than 70 sick -- which was traced back to Cargill's products. The recall is one of the largest recalls of meat in American history.&#160;</p><p>What's particularly alarming is that the salmonella in question is&#160;resistant to antibiotics, at a time when drug-resistant bugs, of all stripes, are generating increased public attention. Just as Cargill was pulling its meat off of store shelves, French&#160;scientists released a report detailing the emergence of another&#160;drug-resistant strain of Salmonella, called <a href="http://www.webmd.boots.com/healthy-eating/news/20110804/salmonella-superbug-warning">"S. Kentucky,"</a> in Europe.&#160;(The California strain is "S. Heidelberg.") S. Kentucky made nearly 500&#160;people sick across the continent between 2000 and 2008, and&#160;researchers suspect that it hopped over the pond to the U.S. and Canada.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/salmonella_turkey_recall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/salmonella_turkey_recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>36M lbs. of turkey recalled in salmonella outbreak</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/us_tainted_ground_turkey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/us_tainted_ground_turkey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/04/us_tainted_ground_turkey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meat producer Cargill lifts its product from store shelves after drug-resistant bug kills one in California]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meat giant Cargill is recalling 36 million pounds of turkey after a government hunt for the source of a salmonella outbreak that has killed one person in California and sickened dozens more.</p><p>The Agriculture Department and the Minnesota-based company announced Wednesday evening that Cargill is recalling fresh and frozen ground turkey products produced at the company's Springdale, Ark., plant from Feb. 20 through Aug. 2 due to possible contamination from the strain of salmonella linked to 76 illnesses and the one death.</p><p>Illnesses in the outbreak date back to March and have been reported in 26 states coast to coast. Both the Agriculture Department and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are still working to identify the source. Meanwhile, the Agriculture Department has warned consumers to properly cook ground turkey.</p><p>Just before the recall announcement Wednesday, CDC epidemiologist Christopher Braden said he thought health authorities were closing in on the suspect. He said some leftover turkey in a package at a victim's house was confirmed to contain the strain of salmonella linked to the outbreak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/us_tainted_ground_turkey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/us_tainted_ground_turkey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>911 called over botched Chinese food order</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you do when your dinner isn't delivered properly? Call the police, of course]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times has this happened to you? You go home and try to enjoy a nice dinner of Chinese food delivery. But when your meal arrives, they've got the order completely wrong!</p><p>Do you:</p><p><strong>A)</strong>	Call back the restaurant and ask for a refund;</p><p><strong>B)</strong>	Just eat the food and promise to deal with it next time;</p><p><strong>C)</strong>	Call the police</p><p>If you answered C, you are not alone. A woman in Savannah, Ga., called 911 to <a href="http://gawker.com/5812001/woman-calls-911-because-she-got-the-wrong-chinese-food">rectify her dinner order</a> yesterday. This was the result:</p><p>
    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ByR1HyhkofE" width="425"></iframe>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p>Sadly, these kinds of calls aren't as uncommon as you might think. In March 2009 a woman called the police after being given <a href="http://news.foodfacts.info/2009/03/now-911-call-over-mcnuggets.html">the wrong order of McNuggets at McDonald's</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/911_call_chinese_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is radioactive food dangerous?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crippled Japanese power plant is contaminating food. What are the health risks?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even short of a catastrophic meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor, serious questions remain about the ongoing crisis's effect on health, particularly with food exposed to radioactive material. Officials have warned about contaminated <a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/techbiz/2011/03/19/D9M25KTO0_as_japan_earthquake/index.html">spinach and milk</a>. Now, hauls of fish pulled in by commercial fishermen near the plant are showing amounts of radioactive iodine-131 double current standards -- prompting the Japanese government to <a href="http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2011/04/05/japans-gonna-need-some-bigger-regulations/">regulate radiation levels in seafood</a>. How worried should people be?</p><p>Salon talked to Stephen Frantz, director of the Reed College Research Reactor, about the threat.</p><p>
    <strong>What does radiation in food do to people?</strong>
  </p><p>When you ingest radioactive material, as the material decays, some of the radiation will hit the cells in your body and perhaps do damage and increase the chances of cancer -- if there's a sufficient amount of materials. "Radioactive" does not mean it's deadly or dangerous. We've been eating radioactive materials all our throughout human history. It's the levels you have to worry about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/05/japan_nuclear_crisis_radioactive_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do food dyes cause hyperactivity?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/food_dyes_hyperactivity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/food_dyes_hyperactivity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2011/03/30/food_dyes_hyperactivity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FDA is questioning its own old claim that food coloring is harmless. But does that mean it's a villain?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration will hear a panel today to examine a possible link between artificial food coloring and hyperactivity in children. Though no one actually expects the FDA to ban the dyes, the panel provides a great opportunity for reporters to dig up hand-wringing parents ... and strike fear into the hearts of many more.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/30/health/policy/30fda.html?ref=science">the New York Times</a>, the petitioner, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, is seeking either an outright ban or, at the very least, a prominent warning label. European companies have had to put warning labels on artificially colored products for years, and many have switched to natural dyes, such as from beets. Should the U.S. follow suit?</p><p>The dye debate has been raging since the 1970s, with very little conclusive evidence to settle for either side once and for all. The FDA previously stated that there was no reason to fear the dyes, but since the use of artificial coloring has skyrocketed in recent years, scientists have been examining this claim, with little success. The most convincing evidence comes from <a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)61306-3/fulltext#article_upsell">a 2007 study</a> headed by University of Southampton professor Jim Stevenson. In the study, children were fed a daily fruit juice containing different concentrations of dyes and the preservative sodium benzoate, and noted a small effect on behavior. It isn't clear whether the dyes, the preservative or the combination caused the effect.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/food_dyes_hyperactivity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/food_dyes_hyperactivity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many bugs are allowed in your pasta? Reading the FDA&#8217;s Food Defect Action Levels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/fda_food_defect_action_levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/fda_food_defect_action_levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2011/01/27/fda_food_defect_action_levels</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a congressman sues over an olive pit, we find the FDA's limits for junk in our own food. Brace yourself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The closest I ever got to being a lawyer was flirting with a married one once, so I'm not going to comment on the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/dennis_kucinich_dohio/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/01/27/kucinich_olive_pit_legal_case">legal wisdom of Dennis Kucinich's suit</a> against congressional cafeteria operators for leaving an unpitted olive in his sandwich three years ago. He bit the pit. The pit hurt him. (<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/01/26/kucinich_sues_sandwich/index.html">Bad, too!</a>) But in light of this awful miscarriage of justice, I recall once learning that many foods are allowed to contain a certain amount of "foreign matter" from the processor.</p><p>So, curious about what other "filth" and "water insoluble inorganic matter" are legally tolerated, I consulted the Food and Drug Administration's stunningly poetic-sounding "Food Defect Action Levels" -- the level of screwiness you are allowed to have in your food before the FDA will take action. You never actually want to get some FDA action, but you might be surprised at how much gunk can be in your product before they will show up with some bad news.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/fda_food_defect_action_levels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/fda_food_defect_action_levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dennis Kucinich sues House cafeteria because of a sandwich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/kucinich_sues_sandwich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/kucinich_sues_sandwich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/26/kucinich_sues_sandwich</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The diminutive congressman suffered an acute loss of enjoyment after accidentally biting into an olive pit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headline basically sums up everything you need to know about this news: Dennis Kucinich is suing the Longworth House Office Building cafeteria <a href="http://gawker.com/5743909/dennis-kucinich-sues-congressional-cafeteria-over-olive-pit">because of a sandwich.</a></p><p>You want more? The friendly Cleveland congressman filed suit against a number of companies that supply and run the congressional eatery, because in 2008 he bit into a "sandwich wrap" of some kind and hurt his teeth on an olive pit.</p><p>According to the suit: "Said sandwich wrap was unwholesome and unfit for human consumption, in that it was represented to contain pitted olives, yet unknown to plaintiff contained an unpitted olive or olives which plaintiff did not reasonably expect to be present in the food prepared for him, and could not visually detect prior to consumption."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/kucinich_sues_sandwich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/kucinich_sues_sandwich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit to Taco Bell: Where&#8217;s the beef?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/us_taco_bell_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/us_taco_bell_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/24/us_taco_bell_lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorney in class action lawsuit says the chain restaurant's "meat mixture" contains less than 35 percent beef]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Alabama law firm claims in a lawsuit that Taco Bell is using false advertising when it refers to using "seasoned ground beef" or "seasoned beef" in its products.</p><p>The meat mixture sold by Taco Bell restaurants contains binders and extenders and does not meet the minimum requirements set by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to be labeled as "beef," according to the legal complaint.</p><p>The class-action lawsuit was filed Friday in federal court in the Central District of California by the Montgomery law firm Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis &amp; Miles.</p><p>Attorney Dee Miles said attorneys had Taco Bell's "meat mixture" tested and found it contained less that 35 percent beef.</p><p>Miles said the lawsuit does not seek monetary damages, but asks the court to order Taco Bell to be honest in its advertising.</p><p>"We are asking that they stop saying that they are selling beef," Miles said.</p><p>Irvine, Calif.-based Taco Bell spokesman Rob Poetsch (PAYCH) said the company denies that its advertising is misleading.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/us_taco_bell_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/us_taco_bell_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kinder Surprise chocolates and other surprising border-patrol contraband</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a woman faced fines for a kid's chocolate, we asked a customs officer: What else can get you in trouble?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the stop-looking-at-my-privates noise being made at airports these days, it's easy to overlook the real victims of Homeland Security crackdowns: the children. Specifically, the children who are expecting their toy-filled Kinder Surprise chocolate eggs.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2011/01/10/man-kinder-surprise-border.html">CBC recently reported the tragic story</a>: A Canadian woman, by the near-symmetrical name of Lind Bird, was driving across the U.S. border when she was stopped for a random search, which randomly turned up the most randomly illegal contraband of all time -- a chocolate egg-toy that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has determined is a clear and present danger out to choke American children. The border patrol officer threatened a $300 fine, Ms. Bird politely gave up the Kinder Surprise, and, after an extended hassle including signing off on a <em>seven-page</em> letter authorizing U.S. authorities to destroy (read: snack on) the confiscated goods, she tried to pick up the pieces and get on with her life, scarred by a government that has that kind of time and money to throw around, but not enough resources for universal healthcare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Loko, other drinks turned into ethanol</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/06/alcoholic_energy_drinks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/06/alcoholic_energy_drinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2011/01/06/alcoholic_energy_drinks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands of cases of caffeinated malt beverages shipped to plant in Virginia in wake of FDA warnings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truckloads of Four Loko and other alcohol-laced energy drinks are being recycled into ethanol and other products after federal authorities told manufacturers the beverages were dangerous and caused users to become "wide-awake drunk."</p><p>Wholesalers from Virginia, North Carolina, Maryland and other East Coast states started sending cases of the high-alcohol, caffeinated malt beverages to MXI Environmental Services in Virginia after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced a crackdown on the sale of such beverages in November.</p><p>Brian Potter, vice president of operations at MXI's facility in Abingdon, Va., said about a couple of hundred truckloads of the drinks would be coming to the plant. Each truck holds 2,000 cases of the 23.5-ounce cans.</p><p>MXI Enterprises is one of three facilities in the U.S. that recycle ethanol, according to the American Coalition for Ethanol, an industry group. Potter said Thursday that his competitors also are taking shipments of the drinks.</p><p>"We're equipped to process four truckloads a day, and we're at full capacity," he said. "There are about 30 different products involved, and we've only seen a couple of them at this point. It could go on for several months."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/06/alcoholic_energy_drinks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/06/alcoholic_energy_drinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama signs $1.4 billion food safety system overhaul</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/us_obama_food_safety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/us_obama_food_safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/04/us_obama_food_safety</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law requires more government inspections at processing facilities and allows regulators to recall unsafe products]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama has signed a $1.4 billion overhaul of the nation's food safety system requiring more government inspections at food processing facilities and allowing federal regulators to order the recall of unsafe products.</p><p>Conservative lawmakers, sensitive to public frustration over high levels of government spending, are balking at the price tag. Obama has said food safety is a priority for him.</p><p>Obama signed the bill into law Tuesday, a day before a more Republican and less White-House friendly Congress returns to Washington.</p><p>The law emphasizes prevention to help stop outbreaks of foodborne illness before they occur. It requires food manufacturers to prepare detailed food safety plans and to tell the Food and Drug Administration what they are doing to keep the food safe at different stages of production.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/us_obama_food_safety/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/04/us_obama_food_safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you safer if the cook is wearing gloves?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/food_handler_glove_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/food_handler_glove_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/10/13/food_handler_glove_laws</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests that they give wearers a false sense of hygiene. We may be better off without them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're at a deli. You watch the cook take the trash out, or have a cigarette, or step away to heed nature's call, and then come back to the kitchen just in time to make your sandwich. "Put some gloves on her!" you want to scream, and, well, health departments all across the country feel the pain of your silent cry. In many cities and states, people handling food have to wear gloves to protect customers. But is wearing gloves actually effective?</p><p>As reported by <a href="http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2010/10/glove-use-doesnt-necessarily-mean-safer-food/">Food Safety News</a>, a new study in the even-more-thrilling-sounding Journal of Food Protection found that wearing gloves is not only no better than thorough, regular hand washing, but may actually be worse than wearing no gloves at all. The heat and moisture from your hands inside are like a Jersey Shore hot tub for bacteria, and neither glove nor reality show star is ever impervious to "losses of integrity," letting that bacteria loose on your ham and Swiss on rye. But to my mind, the study's most salient point is the notion that wearing gloves creates an <em>aura</em> of hygiene that makes it far too easy for cooks to stop thinking about where their hands have been.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/food_handler_glove_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/food_handler_glove_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday link dump: Look away, look away</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/tuesday_link_dump_17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/tuesday_link_dump_17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/14/tuesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A South Carolina costume party, impediments to food safety, and the tale of the "Top Democrats"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Who are "top Democrats," and <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2010/09/14/ask-a-top-democrat.aspx">why do journalists tell us what they think?</a></li>
<li>Proven with political science: <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/77668/yes-pols-its-mostly-safe-ignore-playbook">It's safe to ignore Politico.</a></li>
<li>South Carolina politicians <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0910/Antebellum.html">are still very much South Carolina politicians.</a></li>
<li>The Office of the Inspector General <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=09&amp;year=2010&amp;base_name=mission_accomplished_draft">gives in to the latest bullshit.</a></li>
<li>Surprise: <a href="%20http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-scientists-obama-20100914,0,7599866.story">Corporations and congressmen impede FDA food safety inspections.</a></li>
<li>Michael Kinsley calls on Baby Boomers to fix the mess they created <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/10/the-least-we-can-do/8228">by paying down the debt before they die.</a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/tuesday_link_dump_17/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/tuesday_link_dump_17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to know about the great egg recall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/salmonella_egg_recall_decoster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/salmonella_egg_recall_decoster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of eating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food fights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/08/23/salmonella_egg_recall_decoster</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a half-billion eggs tainted, how to keep safe from salmonella, and what this mess means]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The incredible edible egg is starting to seem like a cup of poison these days, what with a recall of <em>half a billion</em> of the poor things. At this scale, all the numbers that fly around the story are staggering: The recall is tiny compared to our total production of eggs, which is something like a hundred billion. Still, as many as <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38813154/ns/health-food_safety/">39,000 people may have been sickened</a> with salmonella ... and right about here is where most brains will usually do two things -- turn to mush trying to imagine what these numbers mean, and flash a big red X on eating raw eggs. I'm trying to make sense of it myself. But, first off, if you're concerned about your egg safety, there are some easy things you should know.</p><p>
    <strong>Salmonella and its discontents</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/salmonella_egg_recall_decoster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/salmonella_egg_recall_decoster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long can food be out of the fridge before it kills me?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/15/how_long_can_food_be_out_of_the_fridge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/15/how_long_can_food_be_out_of_the_fridge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2010/07/15/how_long_can_food_be_out_of_the_fridge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer is four hours, but there's a lot more to it than that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a caption to a cartoon in the July 5 issue of the New Yorker that reads, "That which doesn't kill you might give you stomach trouble." And of life's most educational episodes, one lesson you really don't want to learn is what it feels like to experience all the parts of your digestive system at the same time.</p><p>Avoiding food poisoning is complex (the p.c. term now is "foodborne illness," lest we start tainting the deli guy as a "poisoner"), but it can be largely boiled down to a few key points about how bacteria grow, taught to us by our friend Fat Tom.</p><p>Fat Tom is not, in fact, a person, but a mnemonic device used by the National Restaurant Association, for whom wit and cuteness don't come easily. (Its literature contains earnest warnings against foods that have been "time temperature abused," and warns against getting your customers sick with an illustration of a judge's gavel <em>banging on a stack of cash</em>.) But it is&#160; good at telling you how to keep bacteria from growing on your lunch. So, Fat Tom helps you remember what makes a bacteria-friendly environment and how to avoid creating one:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/15/how_long_can_food_be_out_of_the_fridge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/15/how_long_can_food_be_out_of_the_fridge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The true cost of doing business in China</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/13/liability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/13/liability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2007/07/13/liability</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suspect product quality isn't the only thing signified by low prices at Wal-Mart.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a general rule, How the World Works doesn't find itself agreeing with Wall Street Journal editorials very often. But Friday's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118427338345265056.html?mod=djemasialinks">"Chinese Fake Out"</a> opinion piece, arguing that the private sector can take care of Chinese food safety and product quality problems all by itself, without the necessity for "protectionist" moves by the U.S. government, is not without merit. </p><p>The Journal argues that those American retailers who think they can just blame their Chinese suppliers for tainted pet food or poison toothpaste and merrily escape any liability are mistaken. "But all bets are off as soon as injured children or sick adults start appearing before juries." Likewise, publicly traded companies "will increasingly see their willingness to invest in China-based quality control reflected in their stock price." </p><p>The critical point is this:<br />
<blockquote></p><p>American companies have not always realized how expensive Chinese-manufactured goods can turn out to be once the cost of low quality is factored in. Low costs are still to be found in China, but they won't be quite as low after accounting for quality control. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/13/liability/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/13/liability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerala&#8217;s showdown with the Wal-Mart of India</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/05/kerala_walmart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/05/kerala_walmart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2007/07/05/kerala_walmart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Indian state threatens to ban "retail giants." Are low prices "anti-people"? Ask China.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Communist government of Kerala is threatening <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a155a024-2a55-11dc-9208-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=a6dfcf08-9c79-11da-8762-0000779e2340.html">to ban "retail giants"</a> from setting up shop in the Indian state. The measure, which appears to be backed by all the major political parties in Kerala, is chiefly aimed at India's version of Wal-Mart, Reliance Industries. <a href="http://www.ibnlive.com/news/after-munnar-kerala-govt-trains-its-guns-on-reliance/44077-7.html">The concern is that a proliferation of large retail outlets</a> would drive tens of thousands of mom-and-pop shop operators out of business. </p><p>Kerala made headlines not so long ago for attempting to ban Coca-Cola; the state has a long history of <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2006/08/30/kerala/index.html">pursuing its own unique path to development.</a> Naturally, the more gung-ho-for-capitalism elements of Indian society aren't mincing their deprecating words: An editorial in the Indian Express made no attempt to <a href="http://www.indianexpress.com/story/203556.html">restrain its sarcasm:</a><br />
<blockquote></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/05/kerala_walmart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/05/kerala_walmart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The feds are still looking for the E. coli</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/e_coli_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/e_coli_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/05/01/e_coli</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the bacterial outbreaks in Pennsylvania and California show, the USDA's food-safety division has trouble tracking down the slaughterhouses that produce tainted meat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all started with Little League baseball players in Napa County, Calif., in early April. Three of them, as young as age 9, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/22/BEEF.TMP">ate hamburgers</a> they purchased from snack vendors at the game. They each fell ill, complaining of cramps and diarrhea, classic symptoms of a potentially deadly bacterium known as <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/escherichiacoli_g.htm">E. coli O157:H7.</a> Just a few days earlier, five people in four <a href="http://www.ecoliblog.com/2007/04/articles/-e-coli-recalls/pennsylvania-e-coli-outbreak-leads-to-recall/">Pennsylvania</a> counties became sick with similar symptoms in an apparently unrelated E. coli case. They had each recently ordered rare and medium-rare steaks at a local restaurant chain, Hoss's Steak and Sea House. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/e_coli_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/e_coli_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

