<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Fox News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/fox_news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Travyon Martin conspiracy theorists get desperate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/travyon_martin_conspiracy_theorists_get_desperate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/travyon_martin_conspiracy_theorists_get_desperate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13351311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their zeal to make the slain teen look like a thug, conservative bloggers push nonexistent police coverup]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mainstream conservative pundits <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/singleton/">started defending</a> George Zimmerman and attacking Trayvon Martin, various <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/debunking-right-wing-media-conspiracy-theory-of-trayvon-martin-story/">conspiracy theories</a> have emerged on the fringes, but the latest one catching fire in the right-wing blogosphere is especially odd, considering it claims police covered up information about the slain teen that was reported over a year ago.</p><p>A Washington Times Communities contributor <a href="http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-realist/2013/jul/1/trayvon-martins-legal-troubles-reportedly-covered-/">wrote</a><a href="http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-realist/2013/jul/1/trayvon-martins-legal-troubles-reportedly-covered-/"> yesterday</a>, based on documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request by a pseudonymous conservative <a href="http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/06/27/understanding-the-foia-releases-and-how-they-pertain/">blogger</a> who goes by "Sundance," that police engaged in an intentional coverup to conceal reports that Martin was suspected of stealing jewelry, among other crimes. The post has already been picked up by a number of well-read conservative blogs and is currently <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/07/02/trayvon-martins-legal-troubles-reportedly-covered-police">leading FoxNation</a>, the conservative news network's aggregation website.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/travyon_martin_conspiracy_theorists_get_desperate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/travyon_martin_conspiracy_theorists_get_desperate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Bill O&#8217;Reilly freak out over the gay marriage rulings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has "morphed into a political organization," O'Reilly argued]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News host Bill O'Reilly was not too happy about the Supreme Court's rulings on DOMA and Proposition 8 (and, for that matter, Obamacare), railing against how "the Supreme Court has put aside its mandate to uphold the Constitution," and has "morphed into a political organization," finding "loopholes" in the Prop 8 and Obamacare cases to get the desired result.</p><p>O'Reilly got particularly angry when talking with Fox News analyst Juan Williams, calling Chief Justice John Roberts' opinion that the backers of Proposition 8 had no standing to appeal the case "just absurd."</p><p>Williams argued that in cases like Prop 8 and Obamacare, Roberts "made a decision based on what he thought was in the political best interest of the Court."</p><p>"That's not his job!" O'Reilly exploded. "That's not his job, Juan!"</p><p>Here's the video. The interview with Williams begins at around 4:25:</p><p><iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Z-misX9BwvY" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Fox News change with America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I left the network in 2011, I wondered how it would adapt to a new country. The answer is it won't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many Americans know, the Supreme Court made history on Wednesday, by affirming marriage equality and clearing the way for gay couples to marry in California. But if you were watching Fox News at the time, this momentous occasion might have eluded you.</p><p>Sure, the cable network covered the DOMA decision as it broke mid-morning, giving the essential details to viewers. But then it swiftly moved onto what it apparently deemed more urgent stories, like an IRS credit card spending spree on porn and wine, a Keystone Pipeline corruption scandal featuring a billionaire supporter of the president, and President Obama's allegedly lavish trip to Africa.</p><p>As someone who worked at Fox News for two and half years, I can tell you this coverage decision wasn’t surprising -- it fits right into the network's strategy.</p><p>I was employed by Fox for two and half years, beginning in 2008 and ending in 2011<em>. </em>Unlike other former Fox producers who’ve caused a stir, I’m not here to dish juicy tidbits about secret meetings or specific anchors. I have no gripes to share about the No. 1 rated cable news channel. But my time there -- beginning on the cusp of the Obama age in 2008 as a guest booker for <a href="http://foxnews.com/">Foxnews.com</a>’s “Strategy Room,” and ending in 2011 working on “Freedom Watch” with Judge Andrew Napolitano -- did give me valuable insight into the network.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/will_fox_news_change_with_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News adopts George Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outside his legal team, few have done more to help Trayvon Martin's shooter than Sean Hannity. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case may be Florida v. George Zimmerman, but it might more aptly be called Florida v. George Zimmerman and the conservative media, as the accused killer has found devoted defenders on the airwaves of Fox News and in the digital pages of conservative blogs.</p><p>Few outside Zimmerman's defense team have done more to help him than Sean Hannity, who on Friday declared that Zimmerman had already won the trial. "As far as I'm concerned, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/06/28/hannity-declares-zimmerman-trial-over/194679">this case is over</a>," the Fox host said after playing testimony from a witness who said he saw Trayvon Martin beating Zimmerman "MMA style." The day before that, Hannity said on his radio show that the judge should dismiss manslaughter, let alone the second-degree murder charges.</p><p>"So the question is why are we here? And the answer to that question is purely political. Politics influenced the decision, the media influenced the decision," Hannity <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/06/28/hannity-argues-judge-should-dismiss-murder-case/194674">said</a>, succinctly revealing why the conservative media has found itself vocally defending someone who admitted to killing teenager Trayvon Martin. It goes like this: Liberals and the media made hay out of the fact that Zimmerman was initially not charged in the killing of Martin. Liberals and the media are bad. Therefore, Zimmerman must be good.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>409</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Kurtz &amp; Fox News: A true love story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purported media critic has long treated the "fair and balanced" network with awe and romance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News and Howard Kurtz may be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/singleton/">a good match</a> not only because the conservative news network has become a stable for journalists who have fallen on hard times, but because the former Daily Beast Washington bureau chief has long been more generous to the network than many of his fellow media critics.</p><p>Not surprisingly, Fox has often come in for a drubbing from media <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7t_vaduSTQ">watchdogs</a> for its often conservative, narrative-driven news coverage. But Kurtz, while occasionally willing to call foul on Fox, is generally pretty credulous of the cable news channel, defending it during controversies, favorably profiling its personalities, and seemingly overlooking its lapses.</p><p>John Cook at Gawker <a href="http://gawker.com/congratulations-to-howard-kurtz-on-his-new-job-521665864">pointed this out</a>, suggesting that Kurtz may have scooped him in 2004 at the behest of a News Corp. PR agent, and pointing to some other examples:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Male Fox News guest to female Democratic consultant: &#8220;Know your role and shut your mouth&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/male_fox_news_guest_to_female_democratic_consultant_know_your_role_and_shut_your_mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/male_fox_news_guest_to_female_democratic_consultant_know_your_role_and_shut_your_mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Cunningham also asked Tamara Holder, "Are you going to cry?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A finger-pointing political argument on Fox News Channel boiled over when a male conservative talk show host shouted at a woman to "know your role and shut your mouth."</p><p>The man, Bill Cunningham, later asked Fox contributor Tamara Holder, "Are you going to cry?"</p><p>Fox on-air personalities on Friday were talking about the exchange on Sean Hannity's prime-time show the night before. Commentator Juan Williams concluded that Cunningham "obliterated the line" of civil discourse in his argument with Holder. The two had been brought on by Hannity to discuss whether Attorney General Eric Holder — no relation to Tamara — had committed perjury.</p><p>Cunningham, sitting next to Tamara Holder in a New York studio, called her "one of the stooges of the left that will always be there to excuse away criminal behavior." He said she had the "incurable fatal condition of liberalism that caused people like Eric Holder to be the consulary of Barack Hussein Obama."</p><p>He was jabbing a finger at Holder, who returned the favor.</p><p>"I really hope that when you speak to a judge, you don't point your finger in the person's face the entire time," she said. "Your finger does not make your point."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/male_fox_news_guest_to_female_democratic_consultant_know_your_role_and_shut_your_mouth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/male_fox_news_guest_to_female_democratic_consultant_know_your_role_and_shut_your_mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The worst of the Paula Deen defenders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/best_of_the_worst_paula_deen_defenders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/best_of_the_worst_paula_deen_defenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News and #TeamPaulaDeen think The Food Network overreacted by letting the celebrity chef go]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Food Network is letting go of its longtime host and celebrity chef, Paula Deen, responding to outrage over Deen's recent racist words.</p><p>Deen's use of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/paula_deen_i_want_black_people_to_play_slaves_at_a_wedding/">racial slurs</a>, her <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/why_hasnt_paula_deen_apologized/">rep's response</a> to the fiasco, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/paula_deen_releases_video_responding_to_allegations_of_racism/singleton/">her bizarre apology</a> have been indefensible. But Fox News, stalwart defender of civil liberties that it is, has come to her rescue. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/06/21/fox-news-correspondent-starnes-the-liberal-anti/194553">Fox News Radio</a> host Todd Starnes said that the "liberal, anti-South media is trying to crucify Paula Deen."</p><blockquote><p>"They accuse her of using a derogatory word to describe a black person. Paula admitted she used the word -- back in the 1980s -- when a black guy walked into the bank, stuck a gun in her face and ordered her to hand over the cash. The national media failed to mention that part of the story. I'll give credit to the Associated Press for telling the full story."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/best_of_the_worst_paula_deen_defenders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/best_of_the_worst_paula_deen_defenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Kurtz joins Fox&#8217;s board of journalism ethics experts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The disgraced media critic follows in the path set by similarly challenged Juan Williams and Judith Miller]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Howard Kurtz joining Fox News, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/business/media/media-critic-howard-kurtz-leaves-cnn-for-fox-news.html">announced today</a>, the conservative network is quickly becoming the home of disgraced journalists who were exiled from the mainstream. No matter their ethical lapses or questionable practices, Fox is apparently happy to take them -- as long as their competitors are not.</p><p>Kurtz, who was fired by the Daily Beast and let go by CNN after <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/howard_kurtz_apologizes_for_reporting_error_on_reliable_sources/">a string</a> of controversies and errors last month, joins Juan Williams, who was fired by NPR and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_column_cribs_from_think_tank_report/">caught in a research assistant plagiarism scandal</a>, and Judith Miller, who was pushed out of the New York Times after carrying water for the Bush White House.</p><p>All three journalists followed a similar arc. They each had talent and promise, which led to meteoric success, which led to hubris that turned into laziness (Williams), complacency (Kurtz), and co-option (Miller). That was followed by flame out, disgrace, and finally refuge in the bosom of Roger Ailes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party&#8217;s sad, nostalgic reunion tour</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/the_tea_partys_sad_nostalgic_reunion_tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/the_tea_partys_sad_nostalgic_reunion_tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reunions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Beck leads a throng of wacky people wishing it were 2010 again -- the last time they were taken seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember way back to 2010? When the Black Eyed Peas' "Boom Boom Pow" was tearing up the charts and a hot new upstart political movement called the Tea Party was striking fear into socialists everywhere? What began on Tax Day in 2009 hit a high-water mark just 18 months later with a massive rally on the National Mall organized by Glenn Beck (which later proved to be the beginning of the end of the Tea Party's purpose for existing: massive anti-government rallies of colorful, flag-waving patriots). There's no question the conservative revival in the GOP has remade the party inside Washington, but the Gadsden flags were rolled up and the tricorn hats put away as the outsider movement honed its insider game.</p><p>Until today. For one day only, the Capitol has been consumed by what feels a bit like a single-night stand reunion tour for a band that had one good album that mostly gets played for nostalgic reasons today. The event was billed as "the largest demonstration of Tea Party support <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/18/the-largest-tea-party-protest-since-2010-is-tomorrow/">since 2010</a>," and while it may have succeeded on that count, it also underscores how much the movement has slipped since that year of its glory.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/the_tea_partys_sad_nostalgic_reunion_tour/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/the_tea_partys_sad_nostalgic_reunion_tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News cans shady market analyst</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/fox_news_cans_shady_market_analyst_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/fox_news_cans_shady_market_analyst_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobin Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tobin Smith allegedly used his news credentials to hawk volatile stocks to conservatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/tobin-smith-fired-fox-news-business-contract-2013-6">has fired</a> paid contributor and market analyst Tobin Smith for receiving compensation to promote the stock of Petrosonic Energy, a violation of network policy. According to a <em>Media Matters </em>review, Smith's company, NBT Equities Research, also received compensation for promoting numerous other companies through his website and conservative newsletters, and used his Fox News credentials to hawk volatile stocks to conservatives.</p><p>MarketWatch's Chuck Jaffe <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fox-commentator-paid-50000-to-tout-stock-2013-06-18">reported</a> that Smith issued "sponsored investment research" to tout Petrosonic's stock in a 20-page mailer, for which NBT received $50,000. The paid endorsement is against Fox's policy that "no contributor to FBN [Fox Business Network], nor his/her firm, and/or family members are allowed to accept financial consideration of any kind whatsoever to issue research, advertisements, or to otherwise promote individual stocks or securities." In a <a href="http://www.nbtequitiesresearch.com/report/nbt-week-lets-have-an-adult-conversation-about-sponsored-research-for-3000-uncovered-invisible-public-companies-in-2013">post today</a> on his website, Smith acknowledged that he is "no longer a Fox contributor" but defended his "business of sponsored research for uncovered emerging growth companies." He also wrote: "For the record, my last contributor agreement with Fox News did NOT include any exclusion from me or my company sponsored research. But that is water under the bridge."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/fox_news_cans_shady_market_analyst_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/fox_news_cans_shady_market_analyst_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean Hannity: &#8220;I&#8217;m not a Republican&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/sean_hannity_im_not_a_republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/sean_hannity_im_not_a_republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannity on his political affiliation, and other highlights from the Fox News host's interview with Playboy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a wide-ranging interview with <a href="http://www.playboy.com/playground/view/playboy-interview-sean-hannity">Playboy</a>, Fox News host Sean Hannity contended early on that he's a "registered Conservative" and "not a Republican, though people often mistake me for one." The interview continued on to cover everything from Mitt Romney to climate change to pot decriminalization. Here are the highlights:</p><p>On Obama's "fear-mongering":</p><blockquote><p>The Republicans have no message discipline. Obama has incredible message discipline. His message right now is “Republicans want to poison the air and water. Republicans want kids with autism and Down syndrome and the elderly to fend for themselves.” He’s brilliant at fear-mongering, at demagoguery. He is always on the attack, always politicizing everything. Meanwhile, he keeps spending and borrowing us into a trillion dollars in debt.</p></blockquote><p>On whether a Mitt Romney presidency would have ushered in a "golden age":</p><blockquote><p>No, but I think you would have had somebody with the experience and the background and, frankly, not as driven by ideology as this president is. Obama’s an ideologue. Now, this being Playboy, you probably won’t agree with me on this, but I think the president is pretty radical in his views.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/sean_hannity_im_not_a_republican/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/sean_hannity_im_not_a_republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: &#8220;The Daily Show&#8221; on the return of Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/must_see_morning_clip_the_daily_show_on_the_return_of_sarah_palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/must_see_morning_clip_the_daily_show_on_the_return_of_sarah_palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's back on Fox News, but that doesn't mean we have to watch her, says John Oliver]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human poptart Sarah Palin is getting <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/sarah_palin_returning_to_fox_news/">major airtime on Fox News again</a>, but that doesn't mean we have to pay attention to her, says "The Daily Show" interim host John Oliver. His bold proposal: "We can just [bleep] ignore her. I promise America, it will feel so good. It'll be like we give our brains an enema together."</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:427238" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-june-17-2013/fantastic-mrs--fox">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/must_see_morning_clip_the_daily_show_on_the_return_of_sarah_palin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/must_see_morning_clip_the_daily_show_on_the_return_of_sarah_palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Sarah Palin actually matters again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/the_return_of_sarah_palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/the_return_of_sarah_palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith and Freedom Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a new Fox contract and sharp words on immigration, the former Alaska gov. is the smiley face of white backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is back! Not only did she get another Fox News contract, <a href="http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/06/sarah-palin-faith-and-freedom-conference-2013-allah-fertility-the-least-untruthful-statements-partial-transcript-2665058.html">she was the star</a> of Ralph Reed’s Faith and Freedom Conference this past weekend for her slashing attacks not only on President Obama and Democrats but on Republican sellouts (and 2016 hopefuls) like Jeb Bush. Watching Palin gleefully take on Bush, who made a dumb comment about needing immigration reform because immigrants are “more fertile” than native-born Americans, I realized that Palin’s star really is rising again, at a time of heightened racial insecurity on the white far-right. They need a hero, and here she is again.</p><p>I stopped paying much attention to Palin around the time <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/sarah_palin_president/">she self-destructed</a> by trying to make herself the victim after the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and the shooting of 18 other people in Tucson, Ariz., in January 2011. After that, not only my attention but others’ seemed to drift away. She declared that she wouldn’t run for president, surprising no one, her spots on Fox News became less frequent (to her loud complaints) and, ultimately, the right-wing network didn’t renew her contract (though it was stated as her choice; she was going on to better things). I thought maybe Palin didn’t matter anymore.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/the_return_of_sarah_palin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/the_return_of_sarah_palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>360</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Fox News to Rush: Secrets of the right&#8217;s lie machine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/from_fox_news_to_rush_secrets_of_the_rights_lie_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/from_fox_news_to_rush_secrets_of_the_rights_lie_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative media plays by its rules, and bends truth to back whatever argument they’ve decided to make that day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One key factor that has altered campaign coverage comes from the corporate right in the form of “conservative” media. If there has been a vacuum created by the downsizing of newsrooms, conservative media have filled it with an insistent partisanship unseen in commercial news media for nearly a century. The conservative media program has been a cornerstone of the Dollarocracy's -- the big money and corporate media election complex -- political program since at least Lewis Powell’s 1971 memo. Initially, the work was largely about criticizing the news media for being unfair to conservative Republicans and having a liberal Democratic bias. Although the actual research to support these claims was, to be generous, thin—one major book edited by Brent Bozell actually claimed corporations such as General Electric were “liberal” companies with an interest in anti-business journalism because they had made small donations to groups like the NAACP and the Audubon Society—the point was not to win academic arguments. The point of bashing the “liberal media,” as Republican National Committee chairman Rich Bond conceded in 1992, was to “work the refs” like a basketball coach does so that “maybe the ref will cut you a little slack” on the next play.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/from_fox_news_to_rush_secrets_of_the_rights_lie_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/from_fox_news_to_rush_secrets_of_the_rights_lie_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>255</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wendi Deng could be Murdoch&#8217;s toughest adversary yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/wendi_deng_could_be_murdochs_toughest_adversary_yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/wendi_deng_could_be_murdochs_toughest_adversary_yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wendi deng]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newscorp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mogul's divorcing his famously "tough" wife. Good luck]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the news arrived Thursday that Rupert Murdoch, the 82-year-old tabloid mogul, was divorcing his third wife, that collective "Hmmmmm …" you could hear gently humming across the land was the sound of a million minds racing to the same thought. Say now -- Wendi Deng Murdoch is <em>available.</em></p><p>Murdoch, as the Times reports, may have been of late too preoccupied <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/business/media/rupert-murdoch-files-for-divorce-after-14-years-of-marriage.html?_r=0">"steering his $73 billion media conglomerate, News Corporation"</a> (I'm sure we can all relate) to pay attention to his wife, but she has not gone unnoticed by the rest of us.</p><p>The 44-year-old Chinese-born businesswoman, whose birth name literally means "cultural revolution," has led a colorful life. As she told Vogue two years ago, <a href="http://www.vogue.co.uk/news/2013/06/14/wendi-deng-murdoch-vogue-interview---rupert-murdoch--tony-blair">"I grew up in a little funny town called Xuzhou, in the countryside, very poor.</a> We didn't have hot water." By the time she was in her early 20s, however, she had an MBA from Yale. She has been a media executive and film producer. She is the mother of Murdoch's two youngest children, Chloe and Grace. But what she is most famed for is her thoroughly no-nonsense loyalty to the man who is now divorcing her.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/wendi_deng_could_be_murdochs_toughest_adversary_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/wendi_deng_could_be_murdochs_toughest_adversary_yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin returning to Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/sarah_palin_returning_to_fox_news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/sarah_palin_returning_to_fox_news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox & friends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Alaska governor returns just five months after "parting ways" with the network]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five months after her departure, Sarah Palin is returning to Fox News as a paid contributor. </p><p>The former Alaska governor first joined Fox in 2010 and soon become the network's <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/08/behind-the-latest-palin-fox-fight.html">highest-paid contributor</a>, earning nearly $1 million a year. Fox even built Palin a private studio in her Wasilla home and network head Roger Ailes told the AP that "I hired Sarah Palin because she was hot and got ratings." But after a series of sour negotiations, Palin "<a href="https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/294928921663795201">parted ways</a>" with Fox in 2013, after the network seemingly “cancelled all my scheduled interviews tonight” according to a post Palin wrote on Facebook.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/sarah_palin_returning_to_fox_news/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/sarah_palin_returning_to_fox_news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 dumbest reactions to the NSA scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/10_dumbest_reactions_to_the_nsa_scandal_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/10_dumbest_reactions_to_the_nsa_scandal_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Toobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These pols and pundits may not know what they're talking about, but they have strong opinions nonetheless]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">NSA leaker Edward Snowden may be a rebel-heartthrob to the EFF crowd, but his whistleblowing is grating the ears of the politicians and pundits who built the intelligence-gathering apparatus Snowden unveiled. These folks haven’t spent the past dozen years expanding the parameters of government surveillance just to have some ingrate let us all in on it, and their responses have ranged from calling Snowden a dimwit to calling for his head. From Fox News to the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, here are the most cringe-inducing reactions.</p><p><strong>1. Jeffrey Toobin</strong></p><p>Jeffrey Toobin’s <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/06/edward-snowden-nsa-leaker-is-no-hero.html" target="_blank">quick and vicious takedown</a> in the <em>New Yorker</em> set the tone for attacking Snowden as a naïve nincompoop. “Any marginally attentive citizen, much less N.S.A. employee or contractor, knows that the entire mission of the agency is to intercept electronic communications,” Toobin wrote. Never mind that even <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/thune-most-members-of-congress-didnt-know-nsa" target="_blank">many legislators</a> were in the dark as to the size and scope of the NSA’s operations—Snowden was one warrant short of a wiretap for believing we hadn’t just assumed the highly classified intrusion into our lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/10_dumbest_reactions_to_the_nsa_scandal_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/10_dumbest_reactions_to_the_nsa_scandal_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highlights from Roger Ailes&#8217; Kennedy Center speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/highlights_from_roger_ailes_kennedy_center_speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/highlights_from_roger_ailes_kennedy_center_speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News president talked Benghazi, the IRS and, of course, Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News chief Roger Ailes gave a rousing speech at the Kennedy Center in Washington on Wednesday, accepting a prize from the Bradley Foundation for being a "visionary of American journalism," worth $250,000. Gabriel Sherman of <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/06/kennedy-center-speech-roger-ailes-gets-wild.html">New York Magazine</a> was on the scene, and reported on some of the best quotes. Here are the highlights:</p><p>On Benghazi and Obama:</p><blockquote><p>"You see, when we ask you to go out in the night and risk your life for America, we promise that we will backstop you and try and get you out if its humanly possible. In Benghazi, we did not do that...I've come to the conclusion that I don't even care what the president of the United States was doing that night. However, I would like to know what the commander-in-chief was doing that night."</p></blockquote><p>On the IRS:</p><blockquote><p>"We already know the IRS is arrogant," he said. "They waste as much money as other government agencies. They enjoy pushing people around, and they can't line dance. We don't need 16,000 more people who can't line dance! And we don't need more people with guns enforcing our health care!"</p></blockquote><p>On America:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/highlights_from_roger_ailes_kennedy_center_speech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/highlights_from_roger_ailes_kennedy_center_speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laura Ingraham: Over-the-counter Plan B is &#8220;a good deal for pedophiles&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/laura_ingraham_over_the_counter_plan_b_is_a_good_deal_for_pedophiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/laura_ingraham_over_the_counter_plan_b_is_a_good_deal_for_pedophiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Korman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pundit also thinks unrestricted access to safe, effective contraception helps "men who want to abuse women"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an appearance on Fox News Tuesday morning, conservative pundit Laura Ingraham called the Obama administration's decision to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/obama_administration_drops_bid_to_block_plan_b_access/" target="_blank">comply with a federal court ruling to make Plan B available over the counter</a> to women and girls of any age "a good deal for pedophiles" and "men who want to abuse women."</p><p>"These girls can’t get their ears pierced, they can’t take an Advil at school without parental permission. Yet, they can go into a pharmacy in this Brave New World of women’s equality and -- quote -- reproductive health and get a morning after pill," she added.</p><p>Despite what Ingraham would like you to believe based on her inventive use of air quotes, emergency contraception has been proven <a href="https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/Tummino%20SJ%20memo.pdf" target="_blank">safe and effective</a> for women and girls -- which is why Judge Edward Korman ordered the administration to make it available without restrictions in the first place, as he noted in his April ruling:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/laura_ingraham_over_the_counter_plan_b_is_a_good_deal_for_pedophiles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/laura_ingraham_over_the_counter_plan_b_is_a_good_deal_for_pedophiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul delusional about compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I am the conduit” for deal on immigration reform, he tells Fox News, while standing on the far-right fringe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again I ask: Is Sen. Rand Paul maybe not so bright? Last week he denounced new National Security Adviser Susan Rice for being "the person who is guilty of misleading us over the Benghazi tragedy." Since a trove of official emails documenting the creation of the Benghazi talking points proved that Rice had nothing to do with them, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/susan_rice_1_rand_paul_0/">I suggested Paul was either lying, or too dumb</a> to understand what the email revealed.</p><p>Now, on Fox News Sunday, he pompously declared “I am the conduit” for “compromise” on immigration reform, suggesting his ties to the far right in the House as well as mainstream Republicans in the Senate make him the man to broker a deal. Except Paul opposes any kind of specific pathway to citizenship for folks who are here illegally, which is a far-right staple that will make a deal impossible (<a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/rand-paul-i-am-conduit-save-immigration-refo">h/t Crooks and Liars</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_delusional_rand_paul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>