<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > fracking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/fracking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking ourselves to death in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Dispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the "downwinders," big energy means big pollution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 70 years ago, a chemical attack was launched against Washington State and Nevada. It poisoned people, animals, everything that grew, breathed air, and drank water. The Marshall Islands were also struck. This formerly pristine Pacific atoll was branded “the most contaminated place in the world.” As their cancers developed, the victims of atomic testing and nuclear weapons development got a name: downwinders. What marked their tragedy was the darkness in which they were kept about what was being done to them. Proof of harm fell to them, not to the U.S. government agencies responsible.</p><p>Now, a new generation of downwinders is getting sick as an emerging  industry pushes the next wonder technology -- in this case, high-volume hydraulic fracturing. Whether they live in Texas, Colorado, or Pennsylvania, their symptoms are the same: rashes, nosebleeds, severe headaches, difficulty breathing, joint pain, intestinal illnesses, memory loss, and more. “In my opinion,” says Yuri Gorby of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, “what we see unfolding is a serious health crisis, one that is just beginning.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/fracking_ourselves_to_death_in_pennsylvania_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking&#8217;s coming boom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/frackings_coming_boom_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/frackings_coming_boom_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Increased export of U.S. natural gas could create an unprecedented demand for high-volume hydraulic fracturing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Unlimited export of U.S. natural gas would have enormous implications on the future of the nation's economy, environment and domestic energy choices. Yet a burgeoning chorus in Congress, on both sides of the aisle, is calling for the swift approval of 19 liquid natural gas (LNG) export permits.</p><p>The acceptance of these permits would unleash an unprecedented frenzy of domestic high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, just to meet daily production rates under decades-long contractual obligations. If accepted, the <a href="http://files.alternet.org/uploads/pdfs/summary_lng_applications.pdf">total</a> of the permits currently under review by the Department of Energy for LNG export would be equal to 28.54 billion cubic feet (Bcf) per day, approximately 45 percent of what the U.S. is projected to consume daily in 2013, according to the <a href="http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/report/%20natgas.cfm">U.S. Energy Administration</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/frackings_coming_boom_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/frackings_coming_boom_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Europe increase fracking?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/will_europe_increase_fracking_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/will_europe_increase_fracking_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shale gas riches have proven tempting for a continent teetering on the brink of economic collapse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> BRUSSELS, Belgium — It's been more than 20 years since the last coal was dug out of the ground by the once-thriving mining communities of Belgium's Campine region.</p><p>Now there's hope of new riches beneath the area's sandy heathland.</p><p>The Campine is one of dozens of regions across Europe believed to be sitting on significant reserves of shale gas — the underground fuel that has revolutionized energy supply in the <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/united-states">United States</a> over the past decade.</p><p>"The potential in Europe could be huge," says Professor Richard Davies, a specialist at <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/united-kingdom">Britain</a>'s Durham University and advisor to the industry. "We've got all the right sort of rocks."</p><p>Shale gas now accounts for more than 20 percent of US natural gas production, up from barely 1 percent in 2000. By the 2030s, it's share is expected to be over 50 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/will_europe_increase_fracking_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/will_europe_increase_fracking_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ed Rendell&#8217;s fracking ties deeper than originally thought</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ed_rendells_fracking_ties_deeper_than_originally_thought_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ed_rendells_fracking_ties_deeper_than_originally_thought_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Rendell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ex-governor claims he has no pecuniary interest in the industry's success. His employment record says otherwise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> Recently, we wrote about former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell's <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/ed-rendell-new-york-fracking-op-ed-disclosure">connections to the natural gas industry</a> after he published a pro-fracking op-ed in The New York Daily News.</p><p>Following our story, Rendell's <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/yes-fracking-n-y-article-1.1299789">column</a> — which called on New York officials to lift a ban on the drilling technique — was updated to disclose that he is a paid consultant to a private equity firm with natural gas investments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ed_rendells_fracking_ties_deeper_than_originally_thought_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ed_rendells_fracking_ties_deeper_than_originally_thought_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking: The next bubble?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that our reliance on cheap, domestic natural gas may not be sustainable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> This article was published in partnership with <a href="http://globalpossibilities.org/">GlobalPossibilities.org</a>.</p><p>Coal and nuclear power industries in the United States have seen better days. The main culprit, energy industry analysts say, is the low cost of domestic natural gas, coupled with carbon-reducing regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the efforts of environmental groups.</p><p>Instead of paying the high costs to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703579804575441683910246338.html">upgrade</a> coal-fired plants and <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geoffreylean/100206841/is-shale-gas-killing-nuclear-power/">repair</a> aged nuclear facilities to meet environmental regulations, power companies across the country have been making the switch to natural gas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ed Rendell&#8217;s disingenuous fracking plea</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/ed_rendells_disingenuous_fracking_plea_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/ed_rendells_disingenuous_fracking_plea_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Rendell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Pennsylvania governor's pro-fracking op-ed Wednesday failed to disclose his industry ties]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> Former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell took to the New York Daily News <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/yes-fracking-n-y-article-1.1299789">op-ed page</a> Wednesday with a message to local officials: stop worrying and learn to love fracking.</p><p>As New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/nyregion/cuomo-delays-decision-on-gas-drilling-as-health-study-continues.html">agonizes</a> over whether to allow the controversial natural gas drilling technique, Rendell invoked his own experience as a Democratic governor who presided over a fracking boom. New York state, Rendell argued, has a major part to play in the nation’s fracking “revolution” — and it can do so safely. He rejected what he called the “false choice” of “natural gas versus the environment.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/ed_rendells_disingenuous_fracking_plea_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/ed_rendells_disingenuous_fracking_plea_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t Frack My Mother,&#8221; sings Yoko Ono and a fairly large number of celebrities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/dont_frack_my_mother_sings_yoko_ono_and_a_fairly_large_number_of_celebrities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/dont_frack_my_mother_sings_yoko_ono_and_a_fairly_large_number_of_celebrities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yoko ono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sean lennon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artists Against Fracking get musical -- and seriously weird -- in a new single against the controversial practice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Lennon, Yoko Ono, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Fred Armisen and other famous faces are doing their very best Bob Dylan in the latest YouTube offering from the <a href="http://artistsagainstfracking.com/" target="_blank">Lennon-Yoko environmental outfit</a>, Artists Against Fracking.</p><p>The tune -- a light riff on "The Times They Are a-Changin'" called "Don't Frack My Mother" -- is a direct appeal to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo while his administration continues to weigh whether to allow fracking in the state. The song is a little like the "We Are the World" of natural gas extraction, but catchier and less self-serious.</p><p>The celebrity crooners implore Cuomo "don't frack my mother, 'cause I ain't got no other" while Ono, in her particular, wonderful brand of shout-song adds, "Don't frack me!" (Related: She is wearing sunglasses, signature fedora and scarf while singing in front of a random white door. Classic Yoko.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/dont_frack_my_mother_sings_yoko_ono_and_a_fairly_large_number_of_celebrities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/dont_frack_my_mother_sings_yoko_ono_and_a_fairly_large_number_of_celebrities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department report OK&#8217;ing Keystone XL linked to oil industry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tar sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consulting firms with ties to oil giants provided the basis of government document]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State Department study published last month OK'ing the Keystone XL pipeline was partly compiled by "oil-industry connected" firms, according to new reports.</p><p>The Environmental Impact Statement,<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/state_department_says_no_environmental_bar_to_kxl/"> as Salon noted</a> on its release, angered environmentalists for its assessment that the project was sound and would have limited negative consequences. As  <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/03/11/state-department-keystone-xl-study-oil-industry-big-tobacco-fracking">DeSmog Blog's Steve Horn noted </a>Tuesday, however, "Unmentioned by State: the study was contracted out to firms with tar sands extraction clientele, as revealed by InsideClimate News."</p><p>InsideClimate News reported that two firms, EnSys Energy and ICF International provided the State Department that basis for their claims:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/state_dept_report_okaying_keystone_xl_linked_to_oil_industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: New Yorkers mostly oppose fracking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/poll_new_yorkers_mostly_oppose_fracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/poll_new_yorkers_mostly_oppose_fracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A narrow margin of voters support keeping the state's moratorium on fracking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.siena.edu/uploadedfiles/home/parents_and_community/community_page/sri/sny_poll/SNY%20March%202013%20Poll%20Release%20--%20FINAL.pdf">Siena</a> poll out Monday finds that a slight majority of New Yorkers oppose lifting a ban on fracking in the state, as Gov. Andrew Cuomo prepares to make a decision about whether to allow the controversial process for drilling for natural gas.</p><p>By a margin of 43-39 percent, voters in the state oppose allowing the moratorium on fracking to be lifted, up slightly from last month when the same poll found that 40 percent opposed it, while 40 percent also supported it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/poll_new_yorkers_mostly_oppose_fracking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/poll_new_yorkers_mostly_oppose_fracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois deal on fracking could be national model</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/illinois_deal_on_fracking_could_be_national_model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/illinois_deal_on_fracking_could_be_national_model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State environmentalists and the oil industry did something extraordinary and unexpected -- they compromised ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHICAGO (AP) — After years of clashing over the drilling method known as hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking," the oil industry and environmentalists have achieved something extraordinary in Illinois: They sat down together to draft regulations both sides could live with.</p><p>If approved by lawmakers, the rules would be the nation's strictest. The Illinois model might also offer a template to other states seeking to carve out a middle ground between energy companies that would like free rein and environmental groups that want to ban the practice entirely.</p><p>Brian Petty is executive vice president of governmental and regulatory affairs at the International Association of Drilling Contractors. He says "anytime you can bring the lion and lamb to the table, it's a good thing."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/illinois_deal_on_fracking_could_be_national_model/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/illinois_deal_on_fracking_could_be_national_model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuomo on verge of approving fracking when RFK Jr. intervened</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discussions with the environmentalist Kennedy were pivotal in delaying the New York governor's decision]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo came as close as he ever has to approving fracking last month, laying out a limited drilling plan for as many as 40 gas wells before changing course to await the findings of a new study after discussions with environmentalist and former brother-in-law Robert F. Kennedy Jr., several people familiar with his thinking told The Associated Press.</p><p>The turning point, which could delay a decision for up to a year or longer, came in a series of phone calls with Kennedy. The two discussed a new health study on the hydraulic fracturing drilling method that could be thorough enough to trump all others in a debate that has split New York for five years.</p><p>"I think the issue suddenly got simple for him," Kennedy told the AP, then went on to paraphrase Cuomo in their discussions: "'If it's causing health problems, I really don't want it in New York state. And if it's not causing health problems, we should figure out a way we can do it.'"</p><p>Kennedy and two other people close to Cuomo, who spoke to the AP only on condition of anonymity because Cuomo is carefully guarding his discussions on the issue, confirmed the outlines of the plan the governor was considering to allow 10 to 40 test wells in economically depressed southern New York towns that want drilling and the jobs it promises. The plan would allow the wells to operate under intense monitoring by the state to see if fracking should continue or expand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/when_cuomo_was_to_approve_fracking_rfk_intervened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read our salon on fracking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two experts pulled apart the issue -- and each other’s arguments -- in real time. Read the debate here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The growing tension between environmental concerns and business interests intensified this weekend amid <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ap-ny-fracking-held-cuomo-rfk-jr-talk-18636918">reports</a> that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo was ready to approve a plan to allow hydraulic fracturing (aka "hydrofracking" or "fracking") in parts of his state, until a last-minute intervention from Robert Kennedy Jr. put the plan on delay as it undergoes further study. As politicians at all levels (including <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/16/fracking-obama-climate-change-goals">the president</a>) will be deciding whether to embrace the controversial method of shale gas drilling in coming months, we asked two experts with divergent views to discuss the issue with us -- and you.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/a_salon_we_drill_into_fracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land grab cheats North Dakota tribes out of $1 billion, suits allege</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/land_grab_cheats_north_dakota_tribes_out_of_1_billion_suits_allege/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/land_grab_cheats_north_dakota_tribes_out_of_1_billion_suits_allege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And is the federal government culpable for failing in its legal obligation to ensure the tribes got a fair deal? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>Native Americans on an oil-rich North Dakota reservation have been cheated out of more than $1 billion by schemes to buy drilling rights for lowball prices, a flurry of recent lawsuits assert. And, the suits claim, the federal government facilitated the alleged swindle by failing in its legal obligation to ensure the tribes got a fair deal.</p> <p>This is a story as old as America itself, given a new twist by fracking and the boom that technology has sparked in North Dakota oil country. Since the late 1800s, the U.S. government has appropriated much of the original tribal lands associated with the Fort Berthold reservation in North Dakota for railroads and white homesteaders. A devastating blow was delivered when the Army Corps of Engineers dammed the Missouri River in 1953, flooding more than 150,000 acres at the heart of the remaining reservation. Members of the Three Affiliated Tribes — the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara — were forced out of the fertile valley and up into the arid and barren surrounding hills, where they live now.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/land_grab_cheats_north_dakota_tribes_out_of_1_billion_suits_allege/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/land_grab_cheats_north_dakota_tribes_out_of_1_billion_suits_allege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not all Dems are Elizabeth Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/not_all_dems_are_elizabeth_warren/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/not_all_dems_are_elizabeth_warren/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite its image of unity, the Democratic Party has its own internal divide pitting money vs. principle]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite its success in recent elections, and despite the image of unity it projects, the Democratic Party is in the throes of an epic identity crisis pitting its corporate money against its stated principles. The recent actions of two of the party's rising stars -- Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren -- tell the deeper tale of that crisis. It is a microcosmic story, suggesting that the 2016 election may be a decisive turning point in the party's history.</p><p>The money side of the schism is embodied by Hickenlooper. As the new vice-chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, the former petroleum geologist and beer mogul represents a cabal of Democratic politicians whose brand couples moderate positions on social issues with hard-edged corporatism on economic ones.</p><p>Corporatism, of course, is a vague label, but in Democratic politics it typically refers to helping campaign contributors bust unions and dismantle environmental regulations, with the expectation that servile labor and environmental leaders will sit by as their movements are decimated.</p><p>Hickenlooper’s actions this month show how the formula works.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/not_all_dems_are_elizabeth_warren/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/not_all_dems_are_elizabeth_warren/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Town board imposes gag order on residents concerned with fracking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/town_board_imposes_gag_order_on_residents_concerned_with_fracking_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/town_board_imposes_gag_order_on_residents_concerned_with_fracking_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources Defense Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnEarth.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents of Sanford, New York, were told they can no longer bring up issues related to fracking in town meetings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.onearth.org/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/02/OElogo_500x55-e1360801074770.png" alt="OnEarth" align="left" /></a> During my 12-year career as a newspaper reporter, I spent thousands of hours sitting through city council meetings, zoning board hearings, property tax appeals, school board work sessions, and just about every other kind of attention-sapping municipal meeting you could possibly imagine. (It wasn’t all bad: I met my wife at one.) At these meetings, it wasn’t uncommon for the same topics to come up over and over again, frequently with the same people making the same points about the same issues that everyone in attendance has heard a million times before. (Think “<a href="mailto:http://www.nbc.com/parks-and-recreation/" target="_blank">Parks and Rec</a>” without any laughs.) So I sympathize, perhaps more than I should, with elected officials and public servants who would like to find a way to make topics they’ve heard about and debated endlessly just … go ... away.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/town_board_imposes_gag_order_on_residents_concerned_with_fracking_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/town_board_imposes_gag_order_on_residents_concerned_with_fracking_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drinking the fracking Kool-aid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/drinking_the_fracking_kool_aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/drinking_the_fracking_kool_aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. John Hickenlooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest claim from the oil and gas industry: Halliburton-produced fracking fluid is safe to drink ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are few politicians - Republican or Democratic - who more singularly embody the notion of "drill, baby drill!" than Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper. This week, in a Washington PR stunt, he yet again proved how devoted he is to deceiving the public on behalf of the oil and gas industry at a high-profile Senate hearing.</p><p>Before we get to the stunt, remember that Hickenlooper started his career as a <a href="http://www.realaspen.com/article/763/Western-Slope-watchdog-groups-worry-ihtat-Colorado-governors-appointees-are-an-oily-bunch">petroleum geologist</a> and his gubernatorial campaign was <a href="http://www.followthemoney.org/database/StateGlance/contributor_details.phtml?c=125393&amp;i=33">bankrolled</a> by the fossil fuel industry. Remember, too, that Hickenlooper has publicly <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/02/08/421314/colorado-governor-john-hickenlooper-now-questions-the-existence-of-climate-change/?mobile=nc">denied</a> that global climate change is even happening; <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/29/governor_or_big_oil_spokesman/singleton/">appointed</a> one of his fossil fuel industry donors to a key regulatory position; overseen <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18881512">both</a> an explosion in oil/gas spills and a decrease in state fines against oil/gas companies for those spills; and is offering to <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/news/2012/12/06/hickenlooper-colorado-wont-sue.html?page=all">help oil/gas firms</a> overturn local drilling regulations. He has, of course, also repeatedly claimed that hydraulic fracturing (aka "fracking") is <a href="http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2011/08/fracking_contamination_inconceivable_john_hickenlooper_epa.php">completely safe</a> and poses <a href="http://coloradopols.com/diary/18144/hickenlooper-fracking-has-literally-no-risk">"literally no risk"</a> to human health.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/drinking_the_fracking_kool_aid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/drinking_the_fracking_kool_aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York town bans discussing fracking at community meetings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/new_york_town_bans_discussing_fracking_at_community_meetings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/new_york_town_bans_discussing_fracking_at_community_meetings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas drilling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13198606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmental groups claim the town violated residents' free speech rights by banning talk of natural gas drilling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Two environmental groups filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday against an upstate New York town, claiming it violated residents' right to free speech by banning discussion of natural gas drilling at town board meetings.</p><p>The town board in Sanford, about 100 miles southwest of Albany in Broome County, passed a resolution in September saying there already had been hours of public comment for and against gas drilling and that no further discussion would be allowed during board meetings, although residents could still submit comments in writing.</p><p>"If people are silenced by their own elected representatives, how can they trust them to act in their best interests?" said Natural Resources Defense Council attorney Kate Sinding as her group announced the U.S. District Court lawsuit. NRDC and Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy filed the lawsuit on behalf of town residents who are members of their groups.</p><p>Herbert Kline, a Binghamton attorney who represents Sanford, said Tuesday that the resolution was supported by an opinion from the state Committee on Open Government. He said he hadn't seen the lawsuit yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/new_york_town_bans_discussing_fracking_at_community_meetings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/new_york_town_bans_discussing_fracking_at_community_meetings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can capitalism and democracy coexist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/can_capitalism_and_democracy_coexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/can_capitalism_and_democracy_coexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hickenlooper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing debate over which levels of government should regulate "fracking" hints at a larger American crisis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you've ever pondered the issues surrounding the tenuous relationship between democracy and capitalism, most likely, you've considered them as both foreign and abstract (much as the elite media <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-10/democracy-and-capitalism-are-heading-for-a-bitter-breakup.html">often</a> <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2043235,00.html">does</a>). Are, say, China and Russia authoritarian, capitalist or both at the same time? Can Middle Eastern countries use their sovereign wealth funds to build prosperous free-market economies while those nations also deny their citizens basic freedoms? Do transnational corporations that <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/technolog/will-tech-firms-cooperate-oppressive-regimes-experts-are-split-865141">operate</a> under the aegis of repressive regimes prove that capitalism can exist wholly without democracy?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/can_capitalism_and_democracy_coexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/can_capitalism_and_democracy_coexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Ruffalo: Actors must be political</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/mark_ruffalo_actors_must_be_political/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/mark_ruffalo_actors_must_be_political/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark ruffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Promised Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt damon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gus Van Sant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Avengers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Kids Are All Right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Avengers" star and outspoken anti-fracking activist explains the difficulty in making a political film today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Ruffalo, the standout in last year's biggest hit "The Avengers," has been dividing his time of late between acting and advocacy: He's worked with New Yorkers Against Fracking to raise awareness of the environmentally destructive drilling method.</p><p>On occasion of the release of "Promised Land," Matt Damon's anti-fracking drama (<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/275867-promised-land-fares-poorly-at-box-office-">which opened softly at the box office</a> and <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1016837-promised_land/">hasn't won over critics</a>), Ruffalo called from the set of Bennett Miller's "Foxcatcher" to discuss the challenges of merging art and politics.</p><p><strong>Have you seen <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/how_fracking_is_corroding_small_town_america/">"Promised Land"</a>?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/mark_ruffalo_actors_must_be_political/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/mark_ruffalo_actors_must_be_political/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Intelligence Council: U.S. is a &#8220;global security provider&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Intelligence Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The center's new "Global Trends 2030" offers a predictably myopic view of America's future place in the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it as a simple formula: if you’ve been hired (and paid handsomely) to protect what is, you’re going to be congenitally ill-equipped to imagine what might be.  And yet the urge not just to know the contours of the future, but to plant the Stars and Stripes in that future has had the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) in its grip since the mid-1990s.  That was the moment when it first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175336/tomgram%3A_engelhardt,_war_is_a_drug/" target="_blank">occurred</a> to some in Washington that U.S. power might be capable of controlling just about everything worth the bother globally for, if not an eternity, then long enough to make the future American property.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/national_intelligence_council_u_s_is_a_global_security_provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>