<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > FX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/fx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where can &#8220;American Horror Story&#8221; go from here?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/where_can_american_horror_story_go_from_here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/where_can_american_horror_story_go_from_here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Horror Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10388141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a creepy, nasty, psychedelic, super-bitchy episode, FX's horror opus let its ghosts take center stage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Just because we're dead doesn't mean we don't have wants ... <i>desires</i>," said Tate, the pouty, bratty, forever-teenage rubber-suit-wearing, mom-of-the-house raping, suicide pact-making ... sorry, I feel like there should be about 12 more adjectives in there, because the ghostly Tate, like most of the characters on FX's aggressively lurid "<a href="http://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/originals/ahs/">American Horror Story</a>," requires them. But let's stay focused on Tate's statement, because it's key. Yes, of course! He and the other ghosts have wants ... <i>desires.</i> And one of the many amazing things about the show is how, over the past few episodes, it has subtly moved the ghosts to the center of the narrative, to the point where the ever-dwindling number of living characters have started to seem like the supporting cast on a show that they were ostensibly the stars of. (Of course, now that they're all dropping like flies -- even money on Constance to bite the dust by the end of season two -- they get to be at the center of the story again.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/where_can_american_horror_story_go_from_here/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/where_can_american_horror_story_go_from_here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The controlled madness of &#8220;American Horror Story&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/the_controlled_madness_of_american_horror_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/the_controlled_madness_of_american_horror_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Horror Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10300615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between Jessica Lange's southern Gothic hamminess and the ever-growing roster of ghosts, this is one loopy show]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Ladies and gentlemen ... the <em>ham</em>."</p><p>This may be the line that Jessica Lange was born to say, in the role she was born to play, on a TV show perfectly suited to her fluttery intensity. Her character Constance delivered it over a tight shot of a ham festooned with moist pineapple slices being thrust into the camera's lens, as if the show were being broadcast in 3-D. It was a perfect kick-off to "Smoldering Children," the 10th episode of the first season of "American Horror Story."</p><p>Written by "X-Files" veteran James Wong and directed by Michael Lehmann ("Heathers"), the hour greatly escalated the madness on this already demented show. Created by "Glee" executive producers Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk, the series seems to be inventing a new kind of horror -- a 21st-century, short-attention-span-theater version, with no lulls. The traditional buildup to the big scare? <em>Booooo</em>-ring. Perhaps operating under the assumption -- not unwarranted -- that most viewers are watching the program on DVR or illegal download and will just fast-forward to the "good parts" anyhow, they've decided to save us all the bother. Every few seconds there's a fabulously bitchy one-liner, a grim bit of exposition or a surprisingly deft transition between the two, or a beating or stabbing or disembowelment or horrendous searing of flesh, or a faintly S&amp;M-dungeon-flavored sex scene, or a revelation that a character you thought was alive was actually <em>dead all along</em>, or that the heroine has been impregnated by both her husband and by a black-rubber-suited spectral hunk and is carrying <em>both</em> of their children.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/the_controlled_madness_of_american_horror_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/the_controlled_madness_of_american_horror_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sons of Anarchy&#8221; goes wonderfully crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/once_upon_a_time_in_charming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/once_upon_a_time_in_charming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sons of Anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10298787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fourth-season finale piles on ludicrous plot twists, but ultimately satisfies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My old friend David Dixon coined a phrase that popped into my head several times during the fourth-season finale of "<a href="http://www.fxnetwork.com/shows/originals/soa/">Sons of Anarchy</a>" -- maximum ludicrosity. It means just what you think it means: an already ludicrous story piles on twists so blazingly nutty that it hits a giddy new peak and becomes, in its way, sublime. This episode, which was written by series creator Kurt Sutter and Chris Collins and directed by Sutter, hit that point the second that the combined federal-local bust of the Sons of Anarchy, the Irish Kings and the Gallindo Cartel was preceded by two supposed members of the latter clan flashing CIA badges at assistant U.S. District Attorney Lincoln Potter. At first I thought it was a scam and wondered why Linc didn't tell them to take their thumbs off the ID photos on those "real" badges. But no: <em>It turns out they were spooks all along!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/once_upon_a_time_in_charming/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/once_upon_a_time_in_charming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sons of Anarchy&#8221;: What happens next, daddy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/sons_of_anarchy_what_happens_next_daddy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/sons_of_anarchy_what_happens_next_daddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sons of Anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10251375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kurt Sutter's biker series practices the most basic form of storytelling with unusual skill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Charles Dickens was at the peak of his popularity, Americans used to wait on East Coast docks for the latest chapters of his serialized novels to arrive. TV dramas are our version of that. The best have that mix of shamelessness and sophistication that Dickens refined into art -- or at the very least, artful melodrama -- and the FX biker drama "Sons of Anarchy" is right up there in the pantheon. Its cliffhanger episode endings are among the most addictive I've seen, and last night offered a great example: a three-way standoff between the increasingly evil gang boss Clay Morrow (Ron Perlman), his disaffected lieutenant Jax (Charlie Hunnam) and the vengeful Opie (Ryan Hurst), who discovered his dad's reeking body and was informed that Clay secretly killed him. Everything about the standoff was utterly shameless: the race-to-the-finish-line lead-up; Opie's tearful speech; Opie leveling his gun at Clay at the precise moment when Jax burst in and screamed at him to drop it; the shot of Clay's body slamming against a wall; Jax's horrified close-up. Cut to black, roll credits.<em> Is he dead? Was he wearing a bulletproof vest?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/sons_of_anarchy_what_happens_next_daddy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/sons_of_anarchy_what_happens_next_daddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Lights Out&#8221; throws a knockout punch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/lights_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/lights_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lights Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2011/01/25/lights_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight's stunning episode of FX's  "Lights Out" should not be missed (not even if Obama's SOTU goes over)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as possible, every ambitious TV series must produce what I call a "Get on the Train" episode -- an episode that demonstrates mastery not just of the medium itself, but the show's dramatic raw material: its characters, story and themes. An installment that confirms beyond a doubt that the people who make the show know what they're doing and what they're trying to say, and can put it all across with discipline and panache. When you've seen an episode like this, you decide to get on the train and see where it takes you.&#160;&#160;</p><p>Tonight's installment of the boxing drama "Lights Out" (10 p.m./9 Central), "<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1648576/">The Shot</a>," is a Get on the Train episode -- modest and economical, yet so densely packed that I've seen it three times but continue to notice new things. (FX has posted the first couple of episodes <a href="http://vod.fxnetworks.com/watch/lightsout">here</a> if you want to catch up.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/lights_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/25/lights_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sons of Anarchy&#8221;: Badass or just bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/22/sons_of_anarchy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/22/sons_of_anarchy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sons of Anarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2009/11/21/sons_of_anarchy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FX's biker drama makes heroes out of swaggering, hard-living thugs, but don't ride into the sunset with this bunch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Dean misled us. Rebellion without cause isn't sexy after all. In fact, in hindsight, it just looks like a bunch of impetuous foot-stomping, particularly to those of us who are too busy spot-cleaning stubborn laundry stains and paying our life insurance premiums to make a big show of going against the grain.</p><p>Yes, of course the governments of the world are a big joke, society is full of shit, rules are made for breaking, common wisdom is anything but wise, blah blah blah. You won't find any arguments from us there. But that doesn't mean we're going to run around setting shit on fire. Walking on the wild side, shunning conformity -- that kind of unfocused lashing out sounds so exhausting. Who has the kind of time and money it takes to exercise their free will anymore?</p><p>Maybe if we were loaded and had lots of handservants to keep us organized and vacuum our floors and watch our kids, then we could lounge about, chain-smoking and questioning authority and such. Surely filthy rich capitalists have the resources for extracurricular sticking-it-to-the-man types of activities. Yes, once we're landed gentry, then we can challenge the dominant paradigm at our leisure, just like Karl Marx and his tony surrealist friends!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/22/sons_of_anarchy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/22/sons_of_anarchy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make &#8220;Nip/Tuck&#8221; a comedy!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/11/nip_tuck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/11/nip_tuck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nip/Tuck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2009/10/11/nip_tuck</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drop the soap! These abusive but self-doubting lotharios are only getting funnier with age]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Am I good enough?</em> Pathetic though it may be, this is the haunting question of adulthood. Shouldn't I be a better parent? Shouldn't I be more ambitious? Shouldn't I contribute more meaningfully to society? Shouldn't my house be a lot cleaner? Shouldn't I look a lot better? And, most important: How much caffeine will I have to ingest to achieve all of the above?</p><p>All of this questioning can make me long for the sociopathic days of my youth, when I cast aside notions of my own responsibilities in favor of questions like: What's his problem? What's her point? Why isn't he in love with me, when I'm obviously delightful? Am I drunker than everyone else here?</p><p>Strangely, I still wake up feeling confused and exhausted just as often.</p><p><em>Am I good enough?</em> Obviously not. Where's the coffee?</p><p>
    <strong>Just one word: Plastics</strong>
  </p><p>The insecurity of adulthood looms around every corner this season on "<strong>Nip/Tuck"</strong> (premieres 10 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 14, on FX), a show that has reinvented itself more times than most of the plastic surgery addicts who frequent the offices of McNamara/Troy. After all, since its first season back in 2003, "Nip/Tuck" has been, at various times, a medical soap, a melodrama and a murder mystery. But based on the unexpected hilarity of this Wednesday's season premiere, "Nip/Tuck" probably should've been a comedy all along.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/11/nip_tuck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/11/nip_tuck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year the small screen fell flat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/28/year_in_tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/28/year_in_tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2008/12/28/year_in_tv</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lackluster pilots, slumping sophomore shows and the devolution of the serial drama. The golden age of TV suddenly looked tarnished in 2008.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The golden age of television may be over just a few short years after it began. 2008 not only marked one of the worst years of TV in the last decade, but all of the momentum and promise of the past few years seemed to vanish in a haze of crappy, unoriginal new programming, lackluster sophomore shows, flaccid sitcoms and pointless cable comedies. No offense to Alan Ball, but when an amusing but uneven first season of "True Blood" is nominated for a Golden Globe award for best TV drama, you know there's something wrong with the state of the small screen.</p><p>And has there ever been a more depressing sign of TV's demise than the move by NBC to give Jay Leno, the epitome of a guy who's flatly bad at his job but continues to be promoted for reasons utterly mysterious to mortal man, a whopping <em>five hours</em> of prime-time real estate, thereby saving themselves from the unpleasant work of finding worthwhile programming to fill their nightly 10 p.m. slot?&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/28/year_in_tv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/28/year_in_tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>131</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebel without a badge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/the_shield/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/the_shield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2008/11/11/the_shield</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As "The Shield" goes into its heart-stopping homestretch, Vic Mackey careens toward a final day of reckoning.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want Vic Mackey to live happily ever after. I'm sure that doesn't reflect well on the strength of my moral fiber -- wanting a lying, murdering, double-dealing cop like "The Shield's" Mackey to escape prosecution, shame and/or an untimely death. But after seven electrifying seasons of FX's suspenseful cop drama, I find myself hoping against hope that, in one last burst of brilliant scheming and strategizing, Mackey will somehow manage to play all of his allies and enemies against each other and emerge unscathed. In spite of his long history of abusing power, his big, messy mistakes, his corruption, his arrogance, his temper, his shortsightedness and his disturbing tendency to play the controlling, mean daddy to female victims, I still want him to pull off his biggest manipulation of all, then slip over the Mexican border and spend the balance of his days sipping margaritas in some sleepy beachside village, flanked by sexy se&#241;oritas, staring out at the lapping blue waves of the Pacific.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/the_shield/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/11/11/the_shield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/25/swingtown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/25/swingtown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2008/05/25/swingtown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying new things has its costs, whether you're trading partners on CBS's "Swingtown" or trading lives on FX's "30 Days."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying new things is great, as long you have adequate insurance coverage. Eating new things can be fun, as long as you don't stumble on some deadly food allergy in the process. Traveling to new places can enlighten and invigorate you, as long as you don't pick up an exotic disease or get thrown into an overseas prison. Having sexual experiences with a new person can be exhilarating, as long as you stop in the heat of the passion to inquire about the person's sexual history, then ask to examine their supply of condoms so you can check the expiration date. </p><p> It's important to be spontaneous in life (it'll keep you young!) as long as you take the proper measures to beat every last remaining drop of spontaneity out of each new situation (it'll keep you alive!). This is the carpe diem paradox: You can seize the day all you want, as long as it doesn't involve risking your life or tapping into your retirement savings. </p><p> Maybe if we didn't need so much complicated paperwork and so many high-priced consultants just to live responsibly in this modern world, it would be possible to stop and smell the flowers. But to stop and breathe in the sweet scent of floral blooms without calculating the tax ramifications, the subsequent loss in income and the potential damage you'll incur to future earnings isn't just irresponsible -- it's downright reckless. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/25/swingtown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/25/swingtown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/24/oprah_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/24/oprah_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2008/02/24/oprah</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The good, the bad and the Oprah! Charity reigns supreme on ABC's "Oprah's Big Give" while tabloid nastiness rules FX's "Dirt." ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer good people with bad attitudes to bad people with good attitudes. Personally, I enjoy lazy, unkempt people whose crabby phone voices mask their pure intentions, and avoid chipper go-getters whose pleasant, friendly exteriors hide a compulsion to win at all costs. When I encounter a broad, professional smile filled with perfectly white teeth and a firm handshake from a neatly manicured hand, I imagine that hand ruthlessly choking the life out of some unlucky little animal while those pretty teeth grit together in concentration. </p><p> Professional, upbeat, focused, detail-oriented people are just creepy, let's face it. Maybe that's why most of us instinctively distrust politicians. "He really seems to have his shit together," is the natural precursor to the question, "What's <i>wrong</i> with him, anyway?" It's not that we're driven to find some hidden flaw; it's that most of us can't personally comprehend what would motivate a person to get their dry-cleaning done in a timely fashion. There's just something a little nefarious about maintaining a consistently polished image. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/24/oprah_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/24/oprah_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/29/crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/29/crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2007/07/29/crazy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the nut house! Would you rather be a high-powered sociopathic litigator, a traumatized bank-robbing war veteran or an emotionally unstable alcoholic detective?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the old days, TV writers used to give their characters lovable traits: He has a soft spot for the downtrodden! She's self-involved but ultimately principled! He sings in the shower! She makes great banana bread, and sneezes cutely around <a href="http://www.mr-lee-catcam.de/pe_catcam2.htm">cats</a>! </p><p>These days, crazy is the new lovable. All you need to get viewers hooked on a character is a succulent psychological disorder or two: Awww, he's so obsessive-compulsive! Look, an alcoholic with violent mood swings! How cute! Her sense of self is so <i>malleable.</i> Oh, I <i>love</i> it when she gets all socially withdrawn and displays flattened affect like that! </p><p>Lead characters still have back stories, but they're usually accompanied by a psychiatric interpretation that justifies a whole host of dangerous quirks, from grandiosity to paranoia to sociopathic tendencies. Robert McKee's screenwriting bible "Story" has been replaced by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders">DSM-IV</a>: Writers simply close their eyes and point to a page, then delight in the possibilities presented by long lists of lively maladies and disturbing behavioral tics. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/29/crazy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/29/crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/01/pirates_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/01/pirates_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2007/07/01/pirates</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should you care about pirates or polygamists? Because TV's subcultural anthropologists want you to care!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subcultures are boring. Remember the good old days, when we thought they were rebellious and exciting? In those days, you had to <i>know</i> someone who owned a comic book store or listened to ska or collected Smurfs. You had to do a little bit of research. You had to ask around. </p><p> But now they're all a Google search away: the foot fetishists, the lactose intolerant, the Dungeon Masters, the chronically fatigued, the Sailor Moon fan fiction writers, the plushies. Today, instead of making friends with like-minded hobbyists and Hobbits, you just wander around alone on eBay, or write elaborate posts on Amazon about your Japanese anime-punk wiki and your Kenyan emo and the really great Czechoslovakian graphic novel you're reading. </p><p> Nowadays, the underground is aboveground, and subverting the dominant paradigm <i>is</i> the dominant paradigm. </p><p> <b>And a bottle of rum</b> <br> What I really mean to say is that I hate pirates. I don't like their pierced noses or their eyeliner or their tangled hair or the way they talk like Keith Richards or the big hooks they use in place of their amputated hands. Pirates are just thieves and murderers who are romanticized because they roam the high seas. Come on now, who really wants to roam the high seas, vomiting and getting scurvy, except for the half insane? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/07/01/pirates_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/07/01/pirates_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finale wrap-up: &#8220;The Shield&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/06/the_shield_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/06/the_shield_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2007/06/06/the_shield</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Traitor Vic: Minutes away from losing his badge, Mackey plays his best game of hardball yet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Are you ready for this?" That's the question Vic Mackey asks city councilman and longtime foe David Aceveda at the end of Tuesday night's riveting finale of "The Shield." Aceveda looks a little shellshocked at the treasure-trove of blackmail Mackey has just stumbled on, the key to unlocking a master plan by the Mexican drug cartel to set up shop in Farmington. Aceveda may be wavering, but at home we're thinking, <i>Are you kidding?</i> Mackey and Aceveda, archenemies, joining forces for good (and probably evil, too, knowing them)? What could be better? </p><p> No other cop show offers up quite as breathtaking a <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/season_finales/">finale </a> as "The Shield," and this sixth season is no exception: Mackey (Michael Chiklis) has done it again. Just when it looked like he'd be damned for all time, disgracefully dismissed from the Farmington police department without fanfare, he pulled off his best trick yet, stumbling on a "trunk full of leverage" pilfered from one of high-level wheeler and dealer Cruz Pezuela's (FJ Rio) men. Having recognized that blowing the lid off the San Marcos murders and playing Pezuela against his former ally Aceveda (Benito Martinez) was the only way to save his badge, Mackey spent the last few hours before he was supposed to appear in front of the review board gathering evidence and deciding on his best course. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/06/06/the_shield_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/06/the_shield_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/01/the_shield_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/01/the_shield_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seinfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2007/04/01/the_shield</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despots rule! Vic Mackey of "The Shield" seeks revenge, while Showtime invents a slimmer, sexier King Henry VIII.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've always had a soft spot for the Misguided Idealist. In a world filled with Lukewarm Layabouts, Pessimistic Hem 'n' Hawers, Wishy-Washy Whatever-heads, Equivocating Eye-Rollers and "I Told You" So-and-So's, the Misguided Idealist leaps without looking, then chases his big dreams up the wrong tree. While the rest of us dilly-dally and second-guess, the Misguided Idealist throws himself behind his cause, proselytizing shamelessly and endorsing a utopian vision that's impossible, costs too much, lacks common sense and won't work on any level. </p><p> But for all of his countless flaws and terrible ideas, the Misguided Idealist has more passion in his little finger than a roomful of Passive-Aggressive Worrywarts, Self-Conscious Ironists, Bloviating Blowhards and Naysaying Neurotics combined. While the rest of us can list a million reasons to do nothing and keep quiet, to sit on the sidelines and whine softly until it's all over and there's nothing left to hope for anyway, the Misguided Idealist sticks his neck out, and this hard, cold world does the chopping. But even as the realities and facts come crumbling down around him, even as his big head rolls across the chopping block, he offers us a brief reprieve from our stagnant lives, where we toe the line and act appropriately and do what's done, all without an original thought in our big, empty heads. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/01/the_shield_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/01/the_shield_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Like to Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/25/iltw_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/25/iltw_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2007/02/25/iltw</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The drudgery of Oscar Night beckons, "Lost" wanders astray, and FX's "The Riches" resuscitates Minnie Driver with -- bonus! -- a fake Southern accent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a guy down the street from me who put a 7-foot-tall inflatable Santa Claus in his front yard the week before Halloween and left it there until a few days ago. His gigantic St. Nick wasn't even blown up all of the time, either. During the day, Santa would lay in a pathetic, deflated heap on the front lawn, as if he were so exhausted by four long months of smiling and waving that he had to spend his leisure hours crumpled up in a miserable red-and-white pile on the grass. </p><p> Every time I read about Oscar season -- which, like Christmas, seems to start earlier and earlier each year -- I think of that poor, depressed Santa down the street. There's so much speculation and pointless blathering dedicated to the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/oscars/">Oscars</a> each year and it starts so early and it's so relentless and so exceptionally tedious, that it's hard not to feel exhausted by it all well before the big night rolls around. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/25/iltw_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/25/iltw_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great bad ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/15/spurlock_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/15/spurlock_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2005/06/15/spurlock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morgan Spurlock searches for a deeper truth -- by turning a mom into a binge drinker and moving a fundamentalist into a gay enclave -- on his new TV show "30 Days." 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brilliant gimmick is worth a thousand words, and no one knows that better than Morgan Spurlock. His "really great bad idea" to eat nothing but McDonald's food for a month -- documented in the entertaining and enlightening 2004 film <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/05/07/super_size_me/">"Super Size Me"</a> -- won him overnight celebrity, the Sundance best director prize and an Academy Award nomination, not to mention a 24.5-pound weight gain, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and impaired liver function. </p><p> Spurlock's liver has gotten back to normal since the film came out, but his life hasn't. In May, he released a book, "Don't Eat This Book: Fast Food and the Supersizing of America," pounding home the brutal facts about fast food he'd explored on film. And his new TV show, <a target="new" href="http://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/originals/30days/main.html">"30 Days,"</a> which premieres on FX this week, applies the experimental gimmick of "Super Size Me" to new landscapes, all with a political edge: How would it feel to be a Muslim for a month? What would it be like to be a binge drinker for that long? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/15/spurlock_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/15/spurlock_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Out of luck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/08/lucky_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/08/lucky_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2003 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2003/04/08/lucky</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FX's new dark comedy "Lucky" follows a hipster Vegas gambler as he wallows in the low life. Don't bet on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were just flipping through the channels and landed on "Lucky" (Tuesdays at 10 p.m. on FX), you might think the network was running old episodes of <a href="http://archive.salon.com/directory/topics/sex_and_the_city/">"Sex and the City"</a> in syndication. Here's the jazzy lounge music, the colorfully hip sets and groovy outfits, and here's John Corbett, arguing with a petite blonde with long hair and sharp features. "What are we doing?!" she's asking him, in an exasperated, high-pitched voice, and we want Aidan to dump that whiny Carrie once and for all. </p><p>In fact, this new half-hour dramedy is just like "Sex and the City" -- if you replace New York with Las Vegas, substitute witty female yuppies looking for a good time with charmless, no-account gambling addicts, drug addicts and con men looking for a quick buck, and swap the snappy dialogue and clever jokes for predictable dialogue and weak attempts at dark humor. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/08/lucky_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/08/lucky_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets, lies and copy machines</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/08/pentagon_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/08/pentagon_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2003 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/review/2003/03/08/pentagon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With James Spader as a cool, collected Daniel Ellsberg, FX's "The Pentagon Papers" paints a chillingly familiar picture of an administration fixated on military action in the face of serious risks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The threat to the free nations of southeast Asia has long been clear ... In recent months, the actions of the North Vietnamese regime have become steadily more threatening." </p><p>-- President Lyndon B. Johnson, Aug. 5, 1964 </p><p>"Saddam Hussein is a threat to our nation ... I think the threat is real, and so do a lot of other people in my government. And since I believe the threat is real, and since my most important job is to protect the security of the American people, that's precisely what we'll do." </p><p>-- President George W. Bush, March 6, 2003 </p><p>"It's naive and even irresponsible for a grown-up today to get her or his information about foreign policy and war and peace exclusively from the administration in power." </p><p>-- <a href="/news/feature/2002/11/19/ellsberg/index.html">Daniel Ellsberg, Salon, Nov. 19, 2002</a> </p><p>With our country at the brink of war, Daniel Ellsberg's words feel more relevant than ever. Of course, most of us are quick to count ourselves among the responsible grown-ups, those smart enough to take the administration's biases into account before believing its message. Still, the shock of a sneak attack like 9/11 has the power to mess with our psychological bearings as a nation. We'd like to believe that the administration has privileged, damning information about the Iraqi regime, because we'd prefer to believe that there's some way of predicting and preventing future terrorist attacks. Otherwise, the insecurity we face on a daily basis becomes almost intolerable. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/08/pentagon_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/08/pentagon_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad cop, worse cop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/04/shield_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/04/shield_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/diary/2002/04/04/shield</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On FX's "The Shield," a squinting sheriff with a loyal posse dispenses vigilante justice to the lawless and the overly tan: It's a cop show George Bush could love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When, in the pilot episode of FX's new dramatic series "The Shield," Detective Holland "Dutch" Wagenbach (Jay Karnes), a classic teacher's-pet type, gets taken off yet another case thanks to Detective Vic Mackey (Michael Chiklis), a classic too-cool-for-school type, he sniffs resentfully to a colleague, "Tell him that this is Los Angeles, not the Wild West." To which we are probably meant to reply, "Sure looks like the Wild West to me, Hoss." You see, gentle viewer, Wagenbach is a big, stiff, by-the-book weenie, whereas Mackey is a swaggering, smirking cowboy with squinting, steely eyes, who leaps off balconies to save babies from the arms of deranged crack addicts. </p><p>Mackey heads an LAPD "elite strike team unit" that operates, in the familiar parlance of rogue cop dramas, under its own set of rules. Kind to hookers and children but resentful of new precinct chief David Aceveda (Benito Martinez), who insists that he follow routine police procedure (and refrain, for example, from torturing a drug dealer with a pair of pliers), he is the outlaw left hand of the otherwise not-so-long arm of the law. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/04/04/shield_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/04/shield_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

