<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gay_marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why conservatives should support immigration equality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/why_conservatives_should_support_immigration_equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/why_conservatives_should_support_immigration_equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Rauch calls GOP opposition to including gay binational couples in immigration reform a "suicide mission" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A majority of Americans now support marriage equality, and a (slowly) <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/gop_senator_rob_portman_endorses_marriage_equality/" target="_blank">growing number of Republicans</a> have recently come around to the idea, too. Despite this, the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/" target="_blank">opposition to the inclusion of gay binational couples and their families in immigration reform</a> remains strong. Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ), of "Gang of Eight" fame, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/" target="_blank">told</a> the New York Times on Wednesday that "there’s a reason this language wasn’t included in the Gang of Eight’s bill: It’s a deal-breaker for most Republicans... Finding consensus on immigration legislation is tough enough without opening the bill up to social issues [like gay marriage].”</p><p>On Thursday in the Daily Beast, writer Jonathan Rauch called Flake's "deal-breaker" misguided -- and a <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/02/immigration-reform-and-the-gop-s-anti-gay-suicide-mission.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29" target="_blank">GOP "suicide mission"</a> (emphasis mine):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/why_conservatives_should_support_immigration_equality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/why_conservatives_should_support_immigration_equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan has change of heart, now supports gay adoption</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wisconsin Republican says he now supports adoption rights for gay couples, but continues to oppose gay marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin Rep. and former vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan has had a change of heart about gay couples adopting, and now believes that gay people can provide loving homes to children who need families. But the House Republican still adamantly opposes <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_new_nicer_anti_gay_marriage_debate/" target="_blank">equal marriage</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/paul_ryan_to_gop_dont_abandon_abortion_fight/" target="_blank">reproductive rights</a> and safe access to abortion care, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/opinion/the-worst-of-paul-ryans-budgets.html?_r=0" target="_blank">Medicare</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/paul_ryans_budget_plan_would_literally_kill_thousands_of_americans_partner/" target="_blank">vital services</a> for low-income families, among <a href="http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/26344/paul-ryan#.UYFORyvP3fM" target="_blank">other things</a>.</p><p>So, in effect, Ryan has made himself .001 percent less awful than he was before.</p><p>In response to a question about gay rights, Ryan chalked his 1999 vote to ban gay adoption in the District of Columbia to a freshman foible during his first term in Congress:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas AG rules domestic partnership benefits violate state constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Abbott argued that the benefits violate the state's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, issued an opinion arguing that providing domestic partnership benefits to same-sex couples in the state is a violation of the state's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.</p><p>The non-binding opinion was in response to a request by state Sen. Dan Patrick, a Republican, who objected to the Pflugerville school district's decision to offer domestic partnership benefits.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.dallasvoice.com/texas-ag-10146274.html">Dallas Voice</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Pflugerville’s decision also prompted a Republican state lawmaker to introduce a bill that would cut funding for school districts that offer DP benefits. The bill — HB 1568 by Drew Springer of Muenster — is awaiting a vote in the House.</p> <p>While Pflugerville was the first school district to offer DP benefits, several other local government entities do so, including the cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth and San Antonio; as well as Dallas County and Parkland hospital. Most offer DP benefits to both same-sex and opposite-sex domestic partners.</p></blockquote><p>In his opinion, Abbott writes that domestic partnerships "have various characteristics in common with the criteria for marriage," enough that "a court is likely to conclude that the domestic partnership legal status about which [Patrick inquires] is 'similar to marriage' and therefore barred by article I, section 32 of the Texas Constitution."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota bill would institute universal civil unions, leave marriage to churches</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the ongoing debate about equal rights for gay families, a Minnesota lawmaker takes a different approach ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Minnesota state lawmakers consider a measure to legalize gay marriage and an alternative civil unions bill for gay couples, Democratic state Rep. Kim Norton has signed on to a third option: universal civil unions.</p><p>The bill would offer civil unions to gay and straight couples, getting the state government out of the marriage business altogether and making "certain that every Minnesotan couple gets a civil union in the state of Minnesota," Norton <a href="http://www.kaaltv.com/article/stories/S3010713.shtml?cat=10217" target="_blank">told</a> ABC's KAALTV. The measure would leave marriage "to the churches that are offering them," she added. Norton did not address how the measure, which was introduced on Thursday, would secure federal benefits for Minnesota couples or out-of-state recognition of civil partnerships.</p><p>Norton had previously supported the Republican-backed measure for gay civil unions, but withdrew her support after calling the bill unfair and unequal. This, she says, is a better compromise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Bush: I won&#8217;t weigh in on gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I’ve made the decision to get off the stage,” he told CBS News ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, George W. Bush won't be joining the ranks of Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter by throwing his support behind marriage equality now that he is safely out of the White House. He is, as ever, his same-old, constitutional-amendment-against-same-sex-marriage-supporting self -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_four_most_interesting_revelations_from_the_hacked_bush_emails/" target="_blank">nude self-portraits</a> and image rehab efforts be damned.</p><p>In an interview with Charlie Rose on CBS News, Bush said that he wouldn't comment on same-sex marriage (after happily commenting on national security and immigration reform, it is worth noting): “Yeah, well, I’m not, I’m not weighing in on these issues, as you know, because I’ve made the decision to get off the stage. And so I’m off the stage,” he told Rose.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rhode Island Senate votes to legalize same-sex marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rhode_island_senate_votes_to_legalize_same_sex_marriage_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rhode_island_senate_votes_to_legalize_same_sex_marriage_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhode island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln Chafee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state would become the 10th to allow gay couples to wed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — Rhode Island senators put the state on the path Wednesday to becoming the 10th state to allow same-sex couples to marry.</p><p>The gay marriage legislation easily passed the Rhode Island House in January, and the Senate vote was seen as the true test. The bill passed 26-12, and now returns to the House for a largely procedural vote, likely next week, before going to Gov. Lincoln Chafee, who supports the legislation.</p><p>"This is a historic piece of legislation, one that literally has been in the works for more than 20 years," said Sen. Donna Nesselbush, D-Pawtucket, the bill's main sponsor in the Senate. "This is something that undoes centuries of discrimination against gay and lesbian couples."</p><p>While the other five New England states already allow gay marriage, heavily Catholic Rhode Island has been a hold-out. Supporters this year mounted an aggressive and coordinated campaign that included organized labor, religious leaders, business owners and leaders including Chafee and Providence Mayor Angel Taveras.</p><p>The bill's chances improved when Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed said she would allow the bill to move forward, despite her opposition to gay marriage. Earlier this week, the Senate's five Republicans announced they would all support the measure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rhode_island_senate_votes_to_legalize_same_sex_marriage_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rhode_island_senate_votes_to_legalize_same_sex_marriage_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fourth grader writes world&#8217;s most perfect argument in support of marriage equality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fourth_grader_writes_worlds_most_perfect_argument_in_support_of_marriage_equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fourth_grader_writes_worlds_most_perfect_argument_in_support_of_marriage_equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay marriage opponents should "just get over it" because you "can't stop two adults from getting married"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cue: "The Greatest Love of All," because the children are, in fact, our future.</p><p>A fourth-grade schoolteacher asked students to write a persuasive essay for a recent assignment, and one of those students chose marriage equality as his topic. What happened next was so good that the teacher had to <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1cywqu/one_of_my_4th_grade_students_chose_gay_marriage/" target="_blank">post it to Reddit</a> so the rest of us could enjoy it.</p><p>Behold (sic):</p><blockquote><p>Why gay people should be able to get married is you can't stop two adult's from getting married because there grown and it doesn't matter if it creeps you out just get over it. And you should be happy for them because it's a big momment in their life. When I went to my grandparents wedding it was the happies momment.</p> <p>As you can see gay people should have the right to get married and you shouldn't judge other peoples lives because if you was gay you wouldn't want people talking about you.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fourth_grader_writes_worlds_most_perfect_argument_in_support_of_marriage_equality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fourth_grader_writes_worlds_most_perfect_argument_in_support_of_marriage_equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confused anti-gay marriage politicians accidentally vote in favor of gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/confused_anti_gay_marriage_politicians_accidentally_vote_in_favor_of_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/confused_anti_gay_marriage_politicians_accidentally_vote_in_favor_of_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four members of France's UMP party were confused by "flashing lights" and "activity" when they cast their votes ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>France's National Assembly voted to approve a measure extending equal marriage and adoption rights to gay couples with a 100-vote margin of victory on Tuesday. But, it seems, the process didn't go smoothly for everyone involved.</p><p><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/henri-guaino-votes-for-gay-marriage-2013-4" target="_blank">According to</a>Business Insider, right wing lawmaker and gay marriage opponent Henri Guaino voted in favor of the bill legalizing gay marriage despite his opposition to the measure, blaming the electronic voting system for his mistake. Three other members of his party ran into the same problem, <a href="http://www.lepoint.fr/politique/mariage-gay-henri-guaino-a-vote-pour-le-projet-par-erreur-23-04-2013-1658370_20.php" target="_blank">reports</a> France's Le Point.</p><p>Guaino blamed the "activity" in the Assembly and the flashing lights of the voting system for his momentary confusion, according to a statement: "You saw the mess that was? I've never seen such a mess in the Assembly! There were three buttons flashing, yes, I [pushed] the wrong button!"</p><p>But rest assured, he adjusted his vote, even if it didn't change the eventual outcome: "I went to the services of the Assembly to correct my vote," he said.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/confused_anti_gay_marriage_politicians_accidentally_vote_in_favor_of_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/confused_anti_gay_marriage_politicians_accidentally_vote_in_favor_of_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pioneering health researcher turned anti-gay activist trolls Sen. Rob Portman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/pioneering_health_researcher_turned_anti_gay_activist_trolls_sen_rob_portman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/pioneering_health_researcher_turned_anti_gay_activist_trolls_sen_rob_portman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a statement, Paul Cameron called marriage equality a "health hazard" and compared being gay to pedophilia ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Cameron was one of the first scientists to examine the adverse health effects of secondhand smoke, but in <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/paul-cameron#.UXgAjisjpLw" target="_blank">60 years since pioneering that research</a>, he has spent his time pushing pseudoscientific literature on the supposed "health risks" of marriage equality. As <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/paul-cameron#.UXgAjisjpLw" target="_blank">noted</a> by the Souther Poverty Law Center, Cameron's work on gays and lesbians has been "rejected by both the American Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association," but embraced by many on the religious right to lend "scientific" credence to anti-gay discrimination.</p><p>On Tuesday, Cameron trolled Ohio Sen. Rob Portman, calling on the Republican lawmaker to renounce his support for gay marriage "for the sake of the son you love."</p><p>In a statement to Portman, Cameron went on to say that marriage equality is a "health hazard" and should be treated as such:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/pioneering_health_researcher_turned_anti_gay_activist_trolls_sen_rob_portman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/pioneering_health_researcher_turned_anti_gay_activist_trolls_sen_rob_portman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa GOPers: Cut pay of justices who made gay marriage decision</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are targeting the Iowa Supreme Court justices who unanimously ruled to legalize gay marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several Republicans in the Iowa House of Representatives are pushing to cut the pay of the Iowa Supreme Court justices who ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage in 2009 -- though they contend that it's not meant to punish the justices.</p><p>Rep. Tom Shaw, a Republican, said that the bill was meant "to maintain the balance of power” between the different branches of government in the state. "We’re just holding them responsible for their decision, for going beyond their bounds,” he said.</p><p>The <a href="http://thegazette.com/2013/04/23/iowa-house-conservatives-want-to-cut-pay-for-justices-in-same-sex-decision/">Iowa Gazette</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The justices “trashed the separation of powers” with their unanimous Varnum v. Brien decision and implementation of same-sex marriage without a change in state law banning any marriages expect between one man and one woman, added Rep. Dwayne Alons, R-Hull.</p> <p>Their amendment to <a href="http://coolice.legis.iowa.gov/Cool-ICE/default.asp?Category=billinfo&amp;Service=Billbook&amp;ga=85&amp;hbill=HF120">House File 120</a>, the judicial branch budget bill, would lower the salaries of the four justices on the seven-member court who were part of the unanimous Varnum v. Brein decision to $25,000 – the same as a state legislator.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violence in France following gay marriage victory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/violence_in_france_following_gay_marriage_victory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/violence_in_france_following_gay_marriage_victory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protests took an angry and sometimes violent turn after France became the 14th country to legalize gay marraige]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While others in the country celebrated, protests in Paris, Lyon and elsewhere took an aggressive, sometimes violent, turn following the French parliament's vote to legalize gay marriage and extend equal adoption rights to same-sex couples.</p><p>In the final reading of the proposal on Tuesday, the National Assembly voted 331 to 225 to adopt the bill. Soon after, anti-gay marriage protestors in Paris began to clash with riot police stationed in the area.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.thelocal.fr/page/view/clashes-and-celebrations-after-gay-marriage-vote#.UXfPHSsjpLx" target="_blank">reported</a> by the Local:</p><blockquote><p>Despite the requests of organizers that marchers disperse peacefully, a hard core group of around 500 refused to leave the Invalides.</p> <p>Their anger soon boiled over as bottles and firecrackers were hurled at the riot police, who had blocked off a street leading to the parliament.</p> <p>One officer was taken to hospital with a head wound after being hit by a brick. “The clashes were extremely violent,” one officer told French media.</p> <p>Police, who responded with tear gas, made 12 arrests. The protesters also turned their ire on journalists in the vicinity, shouting “scumbags" and “collaborators” at the members of the press. At one point a mob of masked protesters chased a group of journalists down the street and a photographer from AFP was sprayed with tear gas.</p> <p>Interior Minister Manuel Valls later said those arrested were linked to far-right organizations.</p> <p>There were also violent clashes in the city of Lyon, where anti-gay marriage protesters took to the streets to express their anger. Police said they had made 44 arrests.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/violence_in_france_following_gay_marriage_victory/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/violence_in_france_following_gay_marriage_victory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Director of Log Cabin Republicans: You can thank Mitt Romney for recent marriage equality gains</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gregory Angelo thinks Mitt Romney's 2012 defeat was a tipping point on gay marriage, not Barack Obama's reversal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama publicly backed marriage equality in May 2012, reaffirmed his position in his second inaugural address and had his administration file pro-gay marriage briefs in both the Prop 8 and Defense of Marriage Act Supreme Court cases. In the months since, politicians from both parties have come out in support of gay marriage, and many advocates view the president's reversal on equal marriage as a tipping point for other lawmakers, even among Republicans.</p><p>But not Gregory Angelo, the executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans. He credits Mitt Romney's tone-deaf position on these issues and his crushing defeat in the 2012 election for slowly (seriously slowly) bringing the GOP around to marriage equality, as he <a href="http://www.advocate.com/print-issue/current-issue/2013/04/22/whos-changing-gop-minds-marriage-mehlman-lcr-director-weigh" target="_blank">told</a> the Advocate:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With France poised to legalize gay marriage, protests take a violent turn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/with_france_poised_to_legalize_gay_marriage_protests_take_a_violent_turn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/with_france_poised_to_legalize_gay_marriage_protests_take_a_violent_turn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A vocal minority protests as the final vote in the French legislature is scheduled for Tuesday afternoon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The French National Assembly is expected to approve a marriage equality bill Tuesday afternoon, making France the 14th country to legalize gay marriage.</p><p>But even with wide voting margins in the legislature and popular support among the public, opposition to the measure that would grant equal marriage and adoption rights to same-sex couples has intensified in recent weeks. Protests in Paris have turned violent, and gay couples have been the victims of vicious assaults.</p><p>As The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/world/europe/in-france-opposition-to-same-sex-marriage-bill-grows.html?pagewanted=2&amp;hp" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>At the margins, the demonstrations have also become more violent and homophobic, with a series of nightly demonstrations last week around Parliament that resulted in clashes with riot police officers and a number of arrests. Even opposition leaders have bemoaned the way harder-right groups have infiltrated the demonstrations, and there has been a small surge in violence against gay men and lesbians, with some beatings and angry, offensive words on social media.</p> <p>Two weeks ago, a Dutch-born man walking with his partner in Paris was beaten up. The man, Wilfred de Bruijn, posted a photograph of his bloodied face on his Facebook page, calling it “the face of Homophobia.” It has been shared thousands of times. Last week, two gay bars, in Bordeaux and Lille, were attacked, and a same-sex couple was attacked Saturday in Nice outside a gay nightclub.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/with_france_poised_to_legalize_gay_marriage_protests_take_a_violent_turn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/with_france_poised_to_legalize_gay_marriage_protests_take_a_violent_turn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton credits daughter Chelsea for reversing his views on gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/bill_clinton_credits_daughter_chelsea_for_reversing_his_views_on_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/bill_clinton_credits_daughter_chelsea_for_reversing_his_views_on_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLAAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chelsea Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former president was honored at the GLAAD awards for advocating against DOMA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former president Bill Clinton, who first signed the Defense of Marriage Act into effect in 1996, has changed his opinion on gay marriage. In March, Clinton wrote an editorial in <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-03-07/opinions/37528448_1_doma-defense-of-marriage-act-marriage-equality">the Washington Post</a> urging the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, writing, "As the president who signed the act into law, I have come to believe that DOMA is contrary to those principles and, in fact, incompatible with our Constitution."</p><p>GLAAD acknowledged the former president's evolved views on marriage equality and subsequent activism with its Advocate for Change Award, presented to Clinton over the weekend.</p><p>During the speech, Clinton reiterated his desire to overturn DOMA, essentially admitting that it was a mistake to sign the law:<br /> "I want to keep working on this until not only is DOMA no longer the law of the land, but until all people - no matter where they live - can marry the people they love," he said. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/bill_clinton_credits_daughter_chelsea_for_reversing_his_views_on_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/bill_clinton_credits_daughter_chelsea_for_reversing_his_views_on_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More thinking on bisexuality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bisexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open marriages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plural marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ Righgts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My suggestion that the "B" in LGBTQ implies legalizing plural marriage got angry replies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reader,</p><p>In response to a recent column about <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/" target="_blank">a bisexual woman who was wondering</a> if she should marry, some people wrote angrily to say that one does not have to want to be in a plural marriage to be bisexual. That makes sense. They said that they were bisexual but happy in a committed monogamous relationship. That too sounds reasonable. Some claimed to have been hurt or insulted by my recent words about bisexuality. So I reexamined what I wrote.</p><p>I want to be kind and I want to be fair and want to admit that I can make mistakes. I hurt some people and I am sorry. I erred in not speaking to enough bisexual people to understand the sensitivity of the issue. I got swept away in the pure logic of it. For that I am sorry.</p><p>But let me state affirmatively what underlies my thinking. People need to make choices based on who they really are. In order to do that they must have legal choices that suit who they are.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pat Robertson: Gay marriage advocates are like Illuminati, want to build &#8220;country without God&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/pat_robertson_gay_marriage_advocates_are_like_illuminati_want_to_build_country_without_god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/pat_robertson_gay_marriage_advocates_are_like_illuminati_want_to_build_country_without_god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Illuminati]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robertson offers a lesson in pseudohistory while pondering the "true motives" of equal rights advocates ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Robertson continues his reign as conductor of the crazy train with his latest  "700 Club" commentary about marriage equality.</p><p>In a circuitous little statement about the French Revolution, the Illuminati and "history repeating itself," Robertson segued his ramblings to gay marriage, asking viewers if equal rights advocates are really "just about marriage," or if their motives "go far beyond that: to destroying the traditional family and building a country without God?”</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/OgpVI-dm9UE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/robertson-gay-marriage-advocates-following-steps-illuminati-out-destroy-god-and-family" target="_blank">Right Wing Watch</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/pat_robertson_gay_marriage_advocates_are_like_illuminati_want_to_build_country_without_god/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/pat_robertson_gay_marriage_advocates_are_like_illuminati_want_to_build_country_without_god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reagan daughter says mom Nancy supports gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/reagan_daughter_says_mom_nancy_supports_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/reagan_daughter_says_mom_nancy_supports_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage equaliy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After speculating about a posthumous gay marriage endorsement from the Gipper, Patti Davis addressed mom's views ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patti Davis, the daughter of former President Ronald Reagan and First Lady Nancy Reagan, announced in a radio interview this week that her mother supports marriage equality.</p><p>This is the second proxy Reagan endorsement for gay marriage to come from Davis in recent weeks. In an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/reagan_daughter_my_dad_would_have_backed_gay_marriage/" target="_blank">interview</a> with The New York Times earlier this month, Davis said that her father would have supported marriage equality because he explained to her as a child that “some men are born wanting to love another man," and counted a lesbian couple among his closest family friends. Davis also cited Reagan's opposition to a ballot measure that would have barred gays and lesbians from working in public schools during his time as governor of California as more gay marriage credentialing.</p><p>When asked if her mother supported gay marriage, Davis responded "she does," adding that her mother likely agreed with her about the Gipper's stance on equal marriage:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/reagan_daughter_says_mom_nancy_supports_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/reagan_daughter_says_mom_nancy_supports_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Zealand passes gay marriage bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/new_zealand_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/new_zealand_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new legislation will also allow gay couples to jointly adopt children for the first time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — Hundreds of jubilant gay-rights advocates celebrated at New Zealand's Parliament Wednesday night as the country become the 13th in the world and the first in the Asia-Pacific region to legalize same-sex marriage.</p><p>Lawmakers voted 77 to 44 in favor of the gay-marriage bill on its third and final reading.</p><p id="continue">People watching from the public gallery and some lawmakers immediately broke into song after the result was announced, singing the New Zealand love song "Pokarekare Ana" in the indigenous Maori language.</p><p>"For us, we can now feel equal to everyone else," said Tania Penafiel Bermudez, a bank teller who said she already considers herself married to partner Sonja Fry but now can get a certificate to prove it. "This means we can feel safe and fair and right in calling each other wife and wife."</p><p>In one of several speeches that ended in a standing ovation, bill sponsor Louisa Wall told lawmakers the change was "our road toward healing."</p><p>"In our society, the meaning of marriage is universal — it's a declaration of love and commitment to a special person," she said. She added that "nothing could make me more proud to be a New Zealander than passing this bill."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/new_zealand_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/new_zealand_passes_gay_marriage_bill_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My gay green card marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For five years I was the husband to a lovely Brazilian woman -- despite the fact that neither of us is straight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">We met up on a recent rainy weeknight at an unremarkable legal office in the outer boroughs. Inside, a warm but appropriately solemn woman sat me down, explained the basics, and told me to sign here, here and here. On the way out the attorney warned Flavia and me that it’d take at least a few months yet for the paperwork to weave itself through the courts. We exchanged resigned glances, sighed semi-dramatically, thanked her for her time, then ducked into a boisterous Greek restaurant a few blocks away for dinner.</p><p dir="ltr">When the waiter brought us our bottle of wine we filled our glasses to the brim, mused about the end of an era, and raised a toast: “To divorce!”</p><p dir="ltr">After a Mediterranean feast we headed over to her apartment nearby so I could finish up some work emails, and over some more wine flipped through our old wedding album, giggling at some of the cheesy photos from the reception. Conspicuously absent from our little album, which a federal bureaucrat had paged through some years back while scrutinizing us closely, were pictures from our honeymoon, a wild Saturday night spent at the Cubbyhole, a popular lesbian bar in the West Village where, incidentally, we also first decided to get married.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My three wives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/my_three_wives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/my_three_wives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plural marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormonism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Society has come a long way toward accepting gay marriage. Could the same ever be true for my polygamous family?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Lately, the debate about gay marriage has led to many conversations about what makes a marriage and who can have one. It’s an interesting question for me because I’m married to three women. I’ve written a book about our family, and my wives have appeared on "Oprah." We weren’t always this open; for years we lived in secrecy and shame – afraid that people would find out, afraid of losing jobs and friendships. But we grew tired of the silence, and it became our mission to help people understand our way of life. <a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/03/28/175619109/if-supreme-court-lets-states-define-marriage-could-legalized-polygamy-make-a-com">Recent</a> <a href="http://www.vice.com/read/after-gay-marriage-why-not-polygamy">stories</a> have wondered if the acceptance of gay marriage could lead to a better understanding of polygamy. I don’t know the answer – but I certainly hope so.</p><p dir="ltr">Plural marriage, as we call it, has always been a part of my life. From an early age, I understood my family was part of a peculiar group trying to live according to old Mormon ways. Both my grandfathers went to prison for polygamy, and I grew up hearing stories of their sacrifice for the “Principle.” We lived in a middle-class area of Salt Lake City, where most of our neighbors were mainstream Mormons (the church banned polygamy more than 100 years ago), and church representatives would show up and try to convert my father. All he had to say was “polygamy,” and they were gone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/my_three_wives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/my_three_wives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>181</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>