<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gay_marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats&#8217; gay marriage excuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/democrats_gay_marriage_excuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/democrats_gay_marriage_excuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Democratic politicians, like Andrew Cuomo, using social issues to distract from the economic status quo?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headlines transmit information in its rawest form -- and the best of headlines crystallize indelible truths. Such was the case this week when the New York Daily News blared this simple but iconic headline: "Cuomo: Minimum Wage Harder to Get Than Gay Marriage."</p><p>The story quoted New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) claiming that the effort to raise wages for the poorest of his constituents represents a "broader and deeper" divide than the recent successful fight to legalize same-sex matrimony in the Empire State. Though the piece quickly dissolved into the ether, it should have received more attention because it is an important Rosetta Stone -- one that translates this era's inscrutable political rhetoric into a clear admission that money trumps everything else.</p><p>Decoding this Rosetta Stone requires just a bit of contextual information from Siena College. According to the school's surveys, only 58 percent of New Yorkers support legalizing gay marriage, while a whopping 78 percent support raising the minimum wage from $7.25 to $8.50.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/democrats_gay_marriage_excuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/25/democrats_gay_marriage_excuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When leaders actually lead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/when_leaders_actually_lead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/when_leaders_actually_lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Obama backers insisted the president could do nothing on his own to advance gay marriage. Boy, were they wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I count myself as a supporter of President Obama who reserves the right to criticize him when I disagree. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/let_biden_be_biden/">And I disagreed with his reluctance to come out in support of gay marriage</a> for a long time. I'm also on record wishing he'd taken a stronger public stance behind several big progressive priorities -- a larger stimulus, tougher Wall Street reform, a public option for health insurance, a big jobs bill – whether or not he had the congressional support to make it happen.</p><p>Throughout the president's first term, his most ardent supporters have reacted to those of us pushing him to do – and say – more on such issues with frustration and anger, some of it nasty and personal, some of it thoughtful and well-argued. They rightly blame Congress for blocking action on key progressive priorities, but strangely downplay the power of presidential leadership. Late last year, New York magazine's Jonathan Chait <a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/liberals-jonathan-chait-2011-11/">twice attacked liberal Obama critics</a> for being "unreasonable" about what the president alone could accomplish, because "liberals, on the whole, are incapable of feeling satisfied with a Democratic president."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/when_leaders_actually_lead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/when_leaders_actually_lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marvel Comics plans wedding for gay hero Northstar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/marvel_comics_plans_wedding_for_gay_hero_northstar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/marvel_comics_plans_wedding_for_gay_hero_northstar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/22/marvel_comics_plans_wedding_for_gay_hero_northstar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out since 1992, the openly gay superhero will walk down the aisle in late June]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Wedding bells will ring this summer for Marvel Comics' first openly gay hero, super speedster Northstar.</p><p>The New York-based publisher said Tuesday that Canadian character Jean-Paul Beaubier will marry his beau, Kyle Jinadu, in the pages of "Astonishing X-Men" No. 51. That's due out June 20.</p><p>Northstar revealed he was gay in the pages of "Alpha Flight" No. 106 in 1992. He was one of Marvel's first characters to do so.</p><p>Since then, numerous comic book heroes and villains have been identified as gay, lesbian or transgender.</p><p>Marjorie Liu is writing the series. She says the decision to have the pair marry was fitting, noting that the relationship between Kyle and Northstar has grown in recent years.</p><p>___</p><p>Marvel Entertainment LLC is owned by The Walt Disney Co.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/marvel_comics_plans_wedding_for_gay_hero_northstar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/marvel_comics_plans_wedding_for_gay_hero_northstar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manny Pacquiao loses his crown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Pacquiao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon's Sexiest Men of 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The boxer's anti-gay remarks lead us to take an unprecedented step: We're revoking his Salon Sexiest Man title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We're all relieved around here that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_doesnt_want_you_dead/">Manny Pacquiao is not really some Leviticus-quoting loon</a> who says that gays "must be put to death" – even if that may have something to do with the fact that he admits "I haven't read the Book of Leviticus yet."</p><p>But it's nonetheless disappointing that a man we at Salon bestowed our highest honor to just six months ago has proven himself so terribly unenlightened. In an interview for Examiner.com last week, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/salons_sexiest_men_of_2011/slide_show/6">one of our 2011 Sexiest Men </a>declared of marriage, "It should not be of the same sex so as to adulterate the altar of matrimony, like in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah of Old." Oh dear. Winning lots of fights? Sexy. Getting elected to the Filipino Congress? Sexy. "Donating millions to improve living conditions in his poverty-stricken nation"? Super hot. Not being down with civil rights? <em>Bzzzzzzt!</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/manny_pacquiao_loses_his_crown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jonathan Rauch: &#8220;We are a sideshow no longer&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/jonathan_rauch_we_are_a_sideshow_no_longer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/jonathan_rauch_we_are_a_sideshow_no_longer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At his first same-sex marriage since Obama's big announcement, a longtime advocate reflects on a decades-long fight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a beautiful spring day in Washington, D.C., around 5 p.m. I am arriving at the august Peterson Institute for International Economics. Today, however, the place is not a think tank but a chapel, and the important words to be uttered are not “trade-weighted exchange rates” but “I do.”</p><p>My old friend Joe Gagnon is getting married today to Paul Adamczak, his longtime partner. How I hate that word “partner”! As if Joe and Paul were members of the same law firm. Within the hour, I am pleased to realize, they will be partners no longer. Under District of Columbia law, they will be husbands.</p><p>Today’s ceremony is freighted with extra excitement. Only three days ago, President Obama announced his support for same-sex marriage. The subject is much discussed here at the wedding. Of course, as an invitee mentions, Obama’s endorsement alters not a jot of law, not a tittle of policy. Yet a cultural barrier has been crossed, a taboo forever retired. The highest officer in the land and, by extension, his political party and half the country have embraced today’s ceremony as their own. We are a sideshow, an outlier, no longer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/jonathan_rauch_we_are_a_sideshow_no_longer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/15/jonathan_rauch_we_are_a_sideshow_no_longer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s next moves on marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_next_moves_on_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_next_moves_on_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president should speak out against state marriage bans and stop enforcing DOMA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama's support for same-sex marriage is a huge victory for the gay rights movement, but it's also a qualified one. Obama said he still supports the right of states to deny couples same-sex marriage rights, but "personally," he thinks that's wrong. In addition to making Obama's stance on gay rights a bit less incoherent — how much sense did it make for him to oppose both gay-marriage and the gay-marriage ban in North Carolina, which passed on Tuesday? — the president's much-anticipated "evolution" opens the door for him to be a more fierce advocate for gay rights.</p><p>I don't mean to downplay the importance of having the president support marriage equality. It's a decisive blow in the culture war. For years, the National Organization for Marriage, which opposes same-sex marriage, has been able to deflect criticism by pointing out that Obama shared its views.</p><p>"Four years ago in California, Prop. 8 supporters had a flyer that they passed out saying Obama opposed same-sex marriage," says John Lewis, legal director for Equality USA, a gay-rights group. "They used his equivocation quite effectively against us. They can’t do that anymore."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_next_moves_on_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_next_moves_on_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s finest hour</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_finest_hour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_finest_hour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For once, the president who ran on a platform of hope and change lived up to his ideals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, the real Barack Obama stood up. He is a better man and a better president for having done so. And America is a better country.</p><p>Homophobia is the last refuge of open bigotry in American life. Racism, anti-Semitism and misogyny still exist, but they lurk in the shadows. It is no longer socially acceptable in any segment of society to openly say that blacks are violent or Latinos are lazy or Jews are grasping or women are genetically inferior. But it is still acceptable to say the crudest and most hate-filled things about gay people. In his 1999 book “One Nation, After All,” sociologist Alan Wolfe found that Americans were remarkably tolerant and open-minded about every controversial subject except one: homosexuality. Attitudes toward gays have become far more enlightened during the last 13 years, but Wolfe’s findings touch on a profound social reality: Many Americans still feel gays are somehow unacceptable, or scary, or immoral, or just different in some way that makes it acceptable to discriminate against them and/or openly disparage them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_finest_hour/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_finest_hour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s marriage epiphany</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_marriage_epiphany/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_marriage_epiphany/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The president has "evolved" past religious conservative figures, like Rick Warren, to whom he used to pander]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“God is the author of marriage,” came the declaration of National Organization for Marriage president Brian Brown moments after President Obama’s historic ABC News interview aired this afternoon. It cannot be redefined, Brown charged, “according to presidential whim.”</p><p>Indeed not, but while Obama’s expressed support for marriage equality changes nothing legally, his words — and particularly those about how <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/5969/obama_says_his_faith_informed_his_support_for_gay_marriage/" target="_blank">his faith</a> informed his views — signal a new direction away from kowtowing to a religiously narrow concept of marriage. In previous statements Obama had parroted the conservative line about “one man and one woman” and just two years ago paid homage to “traditional marriage.” Today Obama explicitly rejected the idea that religious conservatives have a monopoly, either legally or rhetorically, on defining marriage as a straights-only institution.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_marriage_epiphany/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/obamas_marriage_epiphany/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edmund White: A balm to the soul</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/edmund_white_a_balm_to_the_soul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/edmund_white_a_balm_to_the_soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the president announces support for gay marriage, a prominent novelist reflects on years of alienation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested that the president said he discussed the subject of same-sex marriage with his daughters. Their acceptance of the same-sex parents of some of their classmates was so automatic and total that their very ease convinced him that same-sex marriage was inevitable -- and a good thing. Which shows something that anthropologists have known a long time: That innovative behavior comes from children, is passed to their mothers and recognized by their fathers last of all. This rule of innovation holds true throughout the primate world.</p><p>In our polarized country I fear that the president's endorsement of gay marriage will be seized on by the religious right as yet another sign of his Godlessness. But religion, most Americans feel, must evolve too; the Bible must be open to contemporary interpretations, just as the Constitution is. Although Dan Savage stirred up some hostility with his recent contention that the Bible has to be reinterpreted for each generation, he made a strong case that we should no more honor Old Testament taboos of homosexuality than in its explicit endorsement of slavery.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/edmund_white_a_balm_to_the_soul/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/edmund_white_a_balm_to_the_soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A big day for civil rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/a_big_day_for_civil_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/a_big_day_for_civil_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama's gay marriage support carries political risk, but he had no moral choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Make no mistake: President Obama's decision to publicly endorse gay marriage carries serious political risk, though also moral reward. Every state gay-marriage ban referendum has passed, except one in Arizona that was rewritten and adopted on a second try. And in swing states, from North Carolina (which just banned both marriage and civil unions Tuesday) to Nevada to Virginia, the president's stance could cost him votes.</p><p>The latest Gallup poll shows that public opinion has gotten a little cooler toward gay marriage in just the last year, though most Americans support it. The sad truth is, most Americans may back it, but those who oppose it have been far more motivated to cast votes based on their animus, so far anyway.</p><p>That said, it was the right and necessary thing for the president to do. Future generations will look back and wonder what took him so long. The president believes in the saying attributed Martin Luther King Jr., that "the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice." Despite his too-slow "evolution" on gay marriage, Obama knows the arc bends faster when we pull on it, and today he gave it a good tug.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/a_big_day_for_civil_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/a_big_day_for_civil_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s marriage apologists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/obamas_marriage_apologists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/obamas_marriage_apologists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the president reverses his position today, we can thank activists -- not the pundits who gave him a pass]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Gallup's <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/154529/Half-Americans-Support-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx?utm_source=google&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=syndication">poll</a> showed that half of all Americans now support legalizing same sex marriage. This same week, President Obama had his spokesperson <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/05/jay-carney-has-lot-not-answer-gay-marriage/52060/">reiterate</a> his opposition to such a move. That's right, in the face of near-majority public support for equality, the official position of the Democratic administration is that its "feelings about this are constantly evolving" -- a direct quote from the president in 2010.</p><p>In light of Obama's past support for gay marriage as a state legislator and his recent refusal to sign an order barring federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation, it would be logical to assume that -- sans a full-scale reversal (which <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/09/obama-gay-marriage-interview-robin-roberts-abc-news_n_1503311.html">may be in the works tonight</a>) -- the president's position has been "evolving" toward more entrenched opposition to equality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/obamas_marriage_apologists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/obamas_marriage_apologists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gay election, at last</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/2012_the_gay_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/2012_the_gay_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past few days, we 've seen how gay equality will be an unavoidable issue for both presidential campaigns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The time has come,” says the hero of Tony Kushner’s award-winning play “Angels in America” in 1996. “We will be citizens.”</p><p>Looks like the 2012 election will be the moment. First, the Romney campaign appointed an openly gay foreign policy advisor, Richard Grenell. “It’s not an issue for us,” Eric Fehrenstrom, Romney's senior adviser, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/us/politics/richard-grenell-resigns-from-mitt-romneys-foreign-policy-team.html" target="_blank">reportedly</a> said after Grenell disclosed that he was gay.</p><p>Within days, religious conservative and plain old conservative opinion makers in the Republican Party orbit unleashed a tsunami of criticism. The gay diplomatic expert actually supported same-sex marriage; what does his appointment say about Romney’s commitments, they demanded to know. Told to lie low until the controversy blew over, Grenell resigned, leaving the Romney campaign looking clumsy or spineless (or both).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/2012_the_gay_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/2012_the_gay_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney spokesman quits after right-wingers freak out about his being gay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/romney_spokesman_quits_after_right_wingers_freak_out_about_his_being_gay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/romney_spokesman_quits_after_right_wingers_freak_out_about_his_being_gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-gay conservatives hound foreign policy spokesman Richard Grenell into quitting the campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may know Richard Grenell as the Romney "foreign policy spokesman" who had a history of writing dickish things -- <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/special/2012/04/20/468736/richard-grenell-twitter-women/">mainly sexist "jokes"</a> -- on Twitter. He has resigned, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/exclusive-richard-grenell-hounded-from-romney-campaign-by-anti-gay-conservatives/2012/05/01/gIQAccGcuT_blog.html">Jennifer Rubin reports</a>, from the Romney campaign. Not because he didn't have the sense not to post his offensive jokes about Hillary Clinton and Rachel Maddow in a public venue to begin with, or because he then <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/22/richard-grenell-mitt-romney-online-attacks_n_1442726.html">stupidly attempted to scrub his Twitter history</a> after everyone had already seen the posts, but because he is gay, and that grossed out a bunch of creepy right-wingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/romney_spokesman_quits_after_right_wingers_freak_out_about_his_being_gay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/romney_spokesman_quits_after_right_wingers_freak_out_about_his_being_gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A holy war over gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/28/a_holy_war_over_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/28/a_holy_war_over_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12911303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In North Carolina, two churches face off over an upcoming vote on whether to constitutionally ban same sex marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When North Carolina voters head to the polls on May 8, they will be asked to decide on a constitutional amendment - known as "Amendment One" - that prohibits marriages between same-sex couples. Same-sex marriage is already illegal by statute, but N.C. is the only state left in the Southeast without a constitutional ban.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>So this is quite a showdown. There’s much talk of liberty, lifestyle and family -- and a whole lot of talk about God. As opponents and supporters target churches all the way from Appalachia to the Outer Banks, religious leaders are flooding the airwaves to share their views on a hot button issue that throws core values into stark relief.</p><p>Growing up, I attended a church in Raleigh that is deeply involved in the current debate. And I can tell you that the fault lines are deep – and often surprising – to folks in other parts of the country.</p><p><strong>A Tale of Two Churches</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/28/a_holy_war_over_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/28/a_holy_war_over_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An LGBT-labor alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/an_lgbt_labor_alliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/an_lgbt_labor_alliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12874861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Washington to Maryland, unions have become key players in the fight for marriage equality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a straight, black labor organizer, Ezekiel Jackson is not the conventional face of gay rights. But as a visible defender of queer justice to the non-queer population, Jackson was the ideal choice for the presidency of Marylanders for Marriage Equality, a coalition of progressive groups. Last month, MFME made Maryland the eighth state to legalize same-sex marriage, just two weeks after Washington became No. 7.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a><br />
“It wasn’t any struggle to get us on board,” Jackson says of his union, 1199, a local of the Service Employees International Union representing some 400,000 healthcare workers throughout the northeast. “We took a leadership role in putting together the coalition.”</p><p>Once the self-described guardian of “union power, soul power”—an ally of the Black Panthers and student New Leftists and an opponent of the Vietnam War—1199 is still a force for civil rights. This time, it joins a front of union confederates in the march for marriage equality. In fighting for “working families, not just certain families,” as Jackson put it in one campaign spot, labor is pushing the boundaries of queer politics while recharging its own power.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/an_lgbt_labor_alliance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/an_lgbt_labor_alliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Republicans debate Romney donations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12857511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich backers of marriage equality movement also helping to make dedicated equality-opponent president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a past life, as a candidate running for statewide office in Massachusetts, Mitt Romney used to paint himself as a champion of gay rights. While the evidence of his experimentation with supporting legal equality lives on in conservative opposition research, Romney has of late not been particularly eager to push the GOP on LGBT issues. As Maggie Haberman and Emily Schultheis <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=6D9E2C0A-4403-469E-9DB1-579F4CAD69E8">report today in Politico</a>, this has put some of his major gay Republican donors in a bit of a bind.</p><p>Lately gay and LGBT-friendly Republicans have taken a major role in bankrolling and organizing the marriage campaign nationwide, as part of a fairly sudden and welcome shift in public attitude toward same-sex marriage and full legal equality for gays and lesbians. Some of the conservatives donating to equality causes have also donated to and fundraised for Romney. They are attempting to justify this fact in a few ways.</p><p>First, that Romney and Obama both oppose gay marriage. Which is true!</p><blockquote><p>“Mitt Romney is where President Obama is on this issue,” a Republican backer of the likely nominee said.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOM unveiled: It&#8217;s not pretty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/nom_demands_to_know_who_crossed_them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/nom_demands_to_know_who_crossed_them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12813861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-gay organization goes on an anti-leak warpath after its tax documents are disclosed in media reports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Organization for Marriage, a lobbying organization dedicated to battling the prospect of certain people getting married, recently had some tax documents leaked to the press, via their enemies at gay rights group Human Rights Campaign, which says it received the documents from a "whistleblower." The documents reveal that Mitt Romney's campaign <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/30/mitt-romney-gay-marriage_n_1391867.html">donated $10,000 to NOM right before the 2008 election,</a> when the group was fighting to ban gay marriage in California. Romney's donation was not disclosed in public documents.</p><p>The revelation came the week after NOM memos, made public by a Maine court, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeedpolitics/in-secret-documents-anti-gay-marriage-group-plott">revealed that they planned</a> to "drive a wedge between gays and blacks" by exploiting religious intolerance of homosexuality. (Another plot involved finding "children of gay parents willing to speak on camera" and denounce their parents.)</p><p>NOM remained quiet on these revelations for a while, until yesterday, <a href="http://www.nomblog.com/21437/">when NOM sent a press release</a> demanding a federal investigation into finding the person who sent those documents to the Human Rights Campaign. Yes, that will solve everything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/nom_demands_to_know_who_crossed_them/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/nom_demands_to_know_who_crossed_them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the New Hampshire GOP voted to keep gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/how_the_new_hampshire_gop_voted_to_keep_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/how_the_new_hampshire_gop_voted_to_keep_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12735981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tune out Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney. Events in the Granite State suggest the GOP base is rethinking gay marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week the overwhelmingly Republican New Hampshire statehouse voted, well, overwhelmingly to preserve gay marriage. The bill under consideration would have made New Hampshire the first state to repeal gay marriage. Initially, gay activists only hoped to keep the vote under two-thirds of the House, so that Democratic Gov. John Lynch could torpedo it with a veto. But when it came up for a vote, it didn’t even capture a majority of the House’s 297 Republican representatives, elected in the conservative tsunami of 2010.</p><p>How can this be? We’re in the middle of a Republican presidential primary, normally a time for conservatives to beat their chests over social and culture-war issues. And the most recent<a href="http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/Values.htm"> Republican Party platform promises</a> to amend the United States Constitution to prohibit any further gay nuptials.</p><p>Freedom to Marry, which led the campaign against the repeal bill, credits its success in part to inroads it has made nationally with Republicans. Freedom to Marry’s founder, Evan Wolfson, credits conservatives like Ted Olson -- who led the challenge to Proposition 8 in California -- and former Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman with accelerating that trend. Mehlman, newly out a year or two ago, was “very effective,” Wolfson says, in guiding them in New Hampshire. And polling showing an overwhelming opposition to the bill in New Hampshire certainly did not hurt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/how_the_new_hampshire_gop_voted_to_keep_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/how_the_new_hampshire_gop_voted_to_keep_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My son, the straight boy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/my_son_the_straight_boy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/my_son_the_straight_boy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12723831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tommy has two moms and one gay biological dad. But at the age of 4, he had an announcement: He wasn't like us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A week after my partner, Abbie, and I were married at Brooklyn’s City Hall, our 4-year-old son Tommy came out to me. Tommy had been excited about our wedding. He’d picked out his own tie and asked me to wear my hair like Princess Ariel in “The Little Mermaid.” But he had questions, too. “You already had a wedding,” he said — and he was right.</p><p>Three years before he was born, Abbie and I were married by an Episcopalian priest at the New York Botanical Garden. Over 200 guests attended, and the ceremony took place in an enclosed garden on a warm night in July. It was one of the first same-sex weddings featured in a national bridal publication (Modern Bride<em> </em>2004), and there is a picture of us from that day — two blond women in gowns — on Tommy’s bedside table.</p><p>The day Tommy came out to me, we were walking home from school. He was telling me about Taylor, his most recent crush, when he stopped in the middle of the story, looked up and said, “Mama, you know how you and Mommy are gay?”</p><p>I nodded and figured he was going to ask more questions about why we had to get married for the second time.</p><p>“Well,” he said, “I’m not. I’m a boy who likes girls.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/my_son_the_straight_boy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/my_son_the_straight_boy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same sex, opposite impact</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Mehlman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12457431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage equality always seemed a losing issue for the left. That's all changed. Just ask Ken Mehlman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/24/omalley-sign-md-same-sex-marriage-bill-thursday/">Maryland</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/13/washington-gay-marriage-signed-chris-gregoire_n_1273887.html">Washington</a> join six other states in approving same-sex marriage, it's clear that the era of politicians exploiting the issue for political game appears over. Just ask former Republican strategist Ken Mehlman, the man who managed George W. Bush’s 2004 campaign, noted for its aggressive anti-gay marriage stance.</p><p>“If you look at attitudes today and where they are headed, it’s clear to me that supporting equal rights, including the rights to civil marriage, is a net positive for winning elections, as well as the right thing to do,” Mehlman said in an interview. “By contrast, opposing equal rights is a net negative that gets problematic to more voters each year.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/same_sex_opposite_impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

