<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221;: Joan did the right thing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/mad_men_joan_did_the_right_thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/mad_men_joan_did_the_right_thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12929234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her shocking decision caused the web to explode. But feminist or not, it was the smart call]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurred to me, days into being haunted by the most recent "Mad Men," that there was some oblique foreshadowing to Joan’s terrible choice. <em>“Why do they get to decide what's going to happen?”</em> That’s what Pete Campbell demanded several weeks ago in an episode titled “Lady Lazarus.” “They just do,” Harry Crane responded.</p><p>Campbell, frustrated at his inability to pull off a longer-term affair with Beth Dawes, was talking about women as sexual gatekeepers. Despite having all the trappings of privilege and power in his world, Pete is not only unsatisfied, he’s enraged by the belief that this erotic capital somehow makes women more powerful than men.</p><p>But we’re talking about a man who blackmailed a scared au pair into having sex with him – rape, to my mind – and, when he showed up at Beth’s home with her husband after she rejected him, seemed to be trying for a repeat. In Pete's turn this week as Joan Harris’s pimp, stacking the deck to make her choice all but inevitable, he is trying to restore a sexual order where women have very little decision at all. No wonder the selling point of the Jaguar is whether you can truly <em>own </em>something beautiful -- this episode is all about men trying to own women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/mad_men_joan_did_the_right_thing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/mad_men_joan_did_the_right_thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Male grooming: The movie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From beard contests to ball cream, Morgan Spurlock's "Mansome" goofs through modern-day male narcissism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American men are bewildered about their place in the cosmos, or so we have been told repeatedly over the last 20 years. They don't know whether to thread their eyebrows or wield a welding torch, and end up trying to do both at once (which is inadvisable). As comedian Adam Carolla laments in a scene from Morgan Spurlock's documentary <a href="http://mansomethemovie.com/">"Mansome,"</a> the old-time certainties of gender identity have melted away: Women are flying fighter jets and men work at the hair salon; there are no longer "chick jobs and guy jobs."</p><p>I get that Carolla is just cracking wise, from inside the bubble of his own lame version of post-rockabilly guy-shtick -- he is interviewed inside a garage, with what looks like an orange Camaro behind him in the middle distance -- and that if you brought up the fact that those old-time "chick jobs" paid 40 to 80 percent less than "guy jobs," he'd get all irritated with you for being a drag. He's still an idiot, though, even if he's an idiot in quotation marks. That's kind of the problem with "Mansome," which tries to tackle the enormous subject of contemporary male vanity as an assemblage of whimsical anecdotes, which are often entertaining in themselves but studiously avoid any semblance of intelligent analysis or historical understanding.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Avengers&#8221; and Hollywood&#8217;s gender wars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/the_avengers_and_hollywoods_gender_wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/the_avengers_and_hollywoods_gender_wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Avengers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the success of the "Hunger Games," this summer's blockbusters are aimed squarely at male action fantasies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think I'm breaking any news if I tell you that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/the_avengers_will_superhero_movies_never_end/">"The Avengers,"</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/interview_joss_whedon_on_his_two_big_movies/">Joss Whedon's</a> ensemble action-adventure that unites an entire posse of Marvel Comics superheroes, will be far and away this weekend's No. 1 film at the box office. (In fact, "Avengers" is already the eighth-highest grossing film of 2012, with more than $260 million in global revenue <em>before</em> its North American release.) Or that a large majority of those ticket buyers will be teenage boys and young men. Like most summer "tent-pole" productions -- those designed to support franchises, and ensure the financial future of major studios -- "The Avengers" is aimed squarely at guys under 35, long the demographic, psychological and economic bulwark of the movie industry. In the weeks ahead, we'll see a whole bunch more male-centric, big-budget releases: "Battleship," "The Dictator," "Men in Black III," "Prometheus," "The Amazing Spider-Man" and "The Dark Knight Rises," potentially the biggest of all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/the_avengers_and_hollywoods_gender_wars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/the_avengers_and_hollywoods_gender_wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The myth of the &#8220;morning-after abortion pill&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/the_myth_of_the_morning_after_abortion_pill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/the_myth_of_the_morning_after_abortion_pill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12909363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a reason why people mistake emergency contraception and abortion: The right intentionally confuses the two]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started around February, when Republicans were still eager to talk about contraception. The Obama administration, or so Mitt Romney <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/romney-calls-morning-after-pills-abortive-says-right-to-worship-god-is-necessity/">charged</a> in Colorado, was forcing religious institutions to provide “morning-after pills --in other words abortive pills -- and the like, at no cost.”</p><p>It was, of course, a lie. Romney was conflating two different pills: emergency contraception, known as the morning-after pill, which prevents a pregnancy; and chemical abortion, or mifepristone, which ends a pregnancy of up to seven weeks' gestation and isn’t covered under the new guidelines. Since both pills were marketed in the U.S. around the same time, even some pro-choicers have gotten confused. But Colorado happens to be the epicenter of people confusing them on purpose. It’s the birthplace of the Personhood movement and home to Focus on the Family, both of which have strategically called emergency contraception "abortion" on the scientifically unproven basis that they could block a fertilized egg from implanting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/the_myth_of_the_morning_after_abortion_pill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/the_myth_of_the_morning_after_abortion_pill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A &#8220;Hunger Games&#8221; sequel wish list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/a_hunger_games_sequel_wish_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/a_hunger_games_sequel_wish_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hunger Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12856721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood needs more women directing big franchise films. Here are nine who'd do a great job on this one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Playlist doesn't break news all that often, merely seeing fit to be a one-stop shop for the movie news that everyone else breaks during the day (I don't mean that as an insult, the Playlist is the site I go to if I only have time to surf one movie news site in a given day). So it's somewhat of a big deal that the Playlist<a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/gary-ross-exits-catching-fire-will-not-direct-the-hunger-games-sequel-20120406"> broke a pretty major story</a> last week, confirming that director Gary Ross will not be back to helm the second and/or third films in the "Hunger Games" franchise. There had been rumblings all week about contract negotiations, and Ross has now politely passed. The site chalks it up to Ross' lack of desire to stay in the same universe for the next several years combined with a somewhat low-ball offer from Lionsgate. Whatever the case, Ross is gone and the hunt for a new director is on.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/a_hunger_games_sequel_wish_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/a_hunger_games_sequel_wish_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bad marriage plot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/the_bad_marriage_plot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/the_bad_marriage_plot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12797501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Eleanor of Aquitaine to Yolande of Aragon, Europe's strongest women have often clashed with their husbands]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Goldstone, the author of "The Maid and the Queen," takes us on an enjoyable ride through European history, looking at well-connected women who outwitted their husbands or asserted their independence.</p><p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a></p><p><strong>How did you come up with the theme of “strong women in bad marriages” for our conversation?</strong></p><p>I was looking over the books I enjoy and can recommend highly, and this was undeniably one of the underlying themes that seemed to tie them all together. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that a strong woman is likely to have more difficulty in marriage. At least, that definitely applied to a number of royal wives! What is interesting is that sometimes they triumph over their husbands, and sometimes their husbands triumph over them.</p><p><strong>For our first example of just such a strong woman, let’s go back to the Middle Ages to someone who was considered one of the most beautiful women in Europe and one of the great heroines of the middle ages – Eleanor of Aquitaine.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/the_bad_marriage_plot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/the_bad_marriage_plot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicki Minaj&#8217;s curious manhood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/nicki_minajs_curious_manhood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/nicki_minajs_curious_manhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12803451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's one of the best rappers in the world -- so why does she need to pretend to be male?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new Nicki Minaj album, "<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/pink-friday-...-roman-reloaded/id512360310">Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded,</a>" is out and set to take the top spot on Billboard’s albums next week, despite the fact she’s more divisive than ever. Literally: The first half is hardcore rap and the second is club-derived pop. It’s not actually much disputed that she’s one of the greatest rappers in the world right now -- and she might well be the very best.</p><p>But the people claiming to be the truest hip-hop fans only seem to prefer half of the artist, namely when she claims to be playing an invented male personality named Roman. This is often dissonant with her feminine aesthetics and Lady Gaga-influenced wardrobe, part of why she’s celebrated as such an original. So why does a rapper as self-evidently talented as Nicki have to recast herself as a man? Well, to get respect.</p><p>Minaj has spent much of her career playing up an image of traditional (almost cartoonishly so) girliness. One of her earliest mixtapes was called "Barbie World" and “Harajuku Barbie” is one of her many nicknames. On the <a href="http://www.sohh.com/img/nicki-minaj-pink-friday-2010-10-15-300x300.jpg">"Pink Friday" CD cover </a>she intentionally resembles a lifeless, leg-lengthened plastic doll. Her near-literal hourglass figure is widely assumed to be unnatural. In videos and album art she’s bedecked in pastels, shades of rainbow and, yes, pink.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/nicki_minajs_curious_manhood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/nicki_minajs_curious_manhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sexual politics of &#8220;The Hunger Games&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/the_sexual_politics_of_the_hunger_games/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/the_sexual_politics_of_the_hunger_games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hunger Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12716601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anticipated new movie and "Twilight" have one thing in common: It's women who have the power and passion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there were ever a good time to be a young woman, this isn't it. As if a massive backlash against contraception and sexual freedom, a recession and a perverse diet culture weren't enough, it's almost impossible to get tickets for the new "Hunger Games" film.</p><p>As you certainly know by now, in "The Hunger Games," Katniss Everdeen is a teenage girl living in a dystopian far-future America where children from slave communities are forced to slaughter one another on television for the amusement of the wealthy. Katniss is moody, rebellious, deeply committed to protecting her mother and baby sister, and can incidentally shoot a man's eye out through his windpipe. Right now, millions of nice young ladies all over the world want to be her. This should probably worry Rick Santorum more than it seems to.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/the_sexual_politics_of_the_hunger_games/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/the_sexual_politics_of_the_hunger_games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coming fight over violence against women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/the_coming_fight_over_violence_against_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/the_coming_fight_over_violence_against_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12696371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are determined to demagogue the Violence Against Women Act. They're wrong on the politics and the facts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reauthorizing the once-bipartisan Violence Against Women Act used to be a matter of Senate routine, but it has now gone the way of debt-ceiling negotiations -- into the trenches of partisan warfare. Reading recent reports of the coming Capitol Hill showdown on the VAWA, you would either conclude that Republicans are broadening their assault on women, or Democrats have politicized the bill with various poison pills involving LGBT rights, immigration and Native American communities. What gets lost in both explanations is the merits of the actual changes.</p><p>While VAWA has not yet faced a full Senate vote, all Republicans on the Judiciary Committee voted in February against reauthorization. Democrats are clearly trying to use this to capitalize on the recent interest in Republican misogyny, which, legislatively speaking, has become mainstreamed in the party. Sen. Dianne Feinstein asserted on the Senate floor last week that “This is one more step in the removal of rights for women.” Majority Leader Mitch McConnell shot back Thursday, citing a Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74041_Page2.html">article</a> to suggest Sen. Chuck Schumer “is sitting up at night trying to figure out a way to create an issue where there isn’t one … to help Democrats get reelected.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/the_coming_fight_over_violence_against_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/the_coming_fight_over_violence_against_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mockery: Women&#8217;s new weapon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/mockery_womens_new_weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/mockery_womens_new_weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12684011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a sex strike to satirical anti-Viagra bills, the war on reproductive rights has some responding with laughs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a proposed sex strike to mock legislation restricting access to Viagra, women are coming up with increasingly creative ways to respond to attacks on reproductive rights. Many of them are relying on something ladies are <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2007/01/hitchens200701">often said to be without</a>: a sense of humor.</p><p>In case you didn't catch on, the sex strike is tongue-in-cheek. Annette Maxberry-Carrara, founder of Liberal Ladies Who Lunch -- the group that proposed the "Access Denied" protest -- tells me with a laugh, “We're not looking at it as a literal strike." But they are making a serious political statement. The event's tagline reads, "If our reproductive choices are denied, so are yours."</p><p>You would have to be profoundly tone deaf to not recognize the satire in recent bills proposed by female lawmakers that proclaim <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0kJHQpvgB8">"every sperm is sacred"</a> and restrict access to the blue pill. Last month, Oklahoma state Sen. Constance Johnson offered a bill in response to Senate Bill 1433 -- which seriously and nonsatirically holds that a fetus at “every stage of development” has “all the rights, privileges and immunities available to other persons, citizens and residents of this state.” Her proposal states, “[A]ny action in which a man ejaculates or otherwise deposits semen anywhere but in a woman’s vagina shall be interpreted and construed as an action against an unborn child.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/mockery_womens_new_weapon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/mockery_womens_new_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White male nerd culture&#8217;s last stand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/nerd_culture_still_white_male/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/nerd_culture_still_white_male/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12673421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The influential South by Southwest festival does an occasionally awkward dance with diversity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, an enthusiastic white man congratulated film blogger and software development manager Malaika Paquiot-Mose for how well she’d done on the South by Southwest <a href="http://schedule.sxsw.com/2012/events/event_IAP13715">panel</a> that had just ended.</p><p>Inconveniently, Paquiot-Mose hadn’t been on it.</p><p>Still, the gentlemen insisted that she had, despite the fact that Paquiot-Mose and Latoya Peterson, the panel’s moderator, honestly couldn’t figure out which of the black female panelists she had even been mistaken for. It didn’t help that the panel was called “Race: Know When to Hold It and When to Fold It” – on diversity and representation in technology – and by my count, the confused white man must have been one of the only half-dozen of his demographic who bothered to show up.</p><p>On the other hand, he seemed to be really trying, whoever he was, and the panel was far from the only example of SXSW broadening from its typical-tech-dude roots. Such is the uneven distribution of progress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/nerd_culture_still_white_male/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/nerd_culture_still_white_male/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All the shengnu ladies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/all_the_shengnu_ladies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/all_the_shengnu_ladies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12435011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accomplished Chinese women are a new "leftover" generation: Too successful to marry, but disrespected without a man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barring the odd empress, China is historically not a very glorious place to be a woman. From foot-binding to female infanticides, Chinese women have suffered their share of gender-specific hardships. Today, these women are 650 million strong. They represent the world’s largest female population, the highest percentage of self-made female billionaires, and with 63 percent of GMAT takers in China being female, they’re attaining MBAs with a ferocity that’s making the boys blush. And yet, no matter how ambitious or accomplished, they remain bound. Not by their feet, but by something that can be just as inhibiting -- marriage.</p><div>
<p>In China, there’s a deep-seated tradition of marriage hypergamy which mandates that a woman must marry up. This generally works out, as it allows the Chinese man to feel superior, and the woman to jump a social class or two, but it gets messy for highly accomplished females. Their educations and salaries make them hard to compete with, and so their Chinese male counterparts shy away in favor of younger, more “manageable” beauties.</p>
</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/all_the_shengnu_ladies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/all_the_shengnu_ladies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of sexual harassment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/10/the_future_of_sexual_harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/10/the_future_of_sexual_harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12653851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've come a long way in our attitudes about sex and the office -- but not far enough. An expert explains ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These days, it’s impossible to discuss sex in the office without immediately thinking of sexual harassment. The term shows up everywhere, from the campaign trail to, most likely, your nearest office cubicle. But the concept of inappropriate sexual behavior has evolved dramatically since the 1860s, when women first took jobs as clerks in the U.S. Treasury office. Over the past century and a half, people of both sexes have gradually rethought what is and isn’t appropriate sexual behavior in professional environments -- a transformation that has paralleled dramatic reconfigurations in our conceptions of gender, equality and work itself.</p><p>In her new book, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/sex-and-the-office-julie-berebitsky/1104866913?ean=9780300118995&amp;itm=1&amp;usri=sex+and+the+office">“Sex and the Office: A History of Gender, Power, and Desire,”</a> Julie Berebitsky, professor of history and director of the Women’s Studies Program at Sewanee University and author, previously, of “Like Our Very Own: Adoption and the Changing Culture of Motherhood,” explores a vast array of sources, including advertisements, advice guides, archival sources and actual experiences of male and female office workers, to better understand which of our attitudes have changed, and which have stubbornly remained the same. It's a dramatic reminder of the fact that men have claimed to be hardwired for sex -- and women have been accused of being temptresses seeking special favors -- long before Herman Cain and Clarence Thomas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/10/the_future_of_sexual_harassment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/10/the_future_of_sexual_harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hidden meaning of Rush&#8217;s apology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_hidden_meaning_of_rushs_apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_hidden_meaning_of_rushs_apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12653801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that the radio host said sorry at all is the result of a welcome push for a more civil discourse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his long career as the most famous talk radio host in modern history, Rush Limbaugh has only rarely apologized for his rhetoric -- so when he does, it's worth pondering the contrition's deeper meaning. Was his apology last week for calling a Georgetown student a "slut" just a shrewd move to undercut a potential defamation lawsuit? Was it a frightened response to an intensifying backlash from advertisers? Does it prove the power of the liberal political organizations that have an ideological ax to grind against Limbaugh?</p><p>The answer to all those queries is yes -- but none of those factors is the genuine news of the matter. Instead, what makes Limbaugh's apology so important is its context. Capping off other similar brouhahas from across the mediasphere, Limbaugh's mea culpa -- however insincere -- is significant because it is proof that America may be both setting some basic standards for political discourse and rejecting the right-wing shrieks about "censorship" and "political correctness."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_hidden_meaning_of_rushs_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_hidden_meaning_of_rushs_apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Afghan justice quandary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/the_afghan_justice_quandary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/the_afghan_justice_quandary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12598621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. increasingly backs the power of local councils. Are women's rights being sacrificed in the process?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December 2001, the U.S.-led offensive forced the Taliban to scatter over the mountains into Pakistan and the international community rushed into Kabul with the best of intentions.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a>One of their primary goals was to reform the Afghan justice sector. And they waded in with a confidence bordering on arrogance, combined with a troubling disregard for the legal structures, however precarious, that were already in place.</p><p>In just a little over two years, Afghanistan had a new Constitution; there were training programs for judges and lawyers, and international organizations were making millions providing services to the U.S. government in its quest to make sense of the muddle.</p><p>Ten years later, these efforts have become a nearly $1 billion “Rule of Law industry,” as one international legal specialist, who has spent several years in Afghanistan, dubbed the enterprise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/the_afghan_justice_quandary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/07/the_afghan_justice_quandary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The small, sexist joke that became a big deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12526731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A crass laundry label sets off a social media firestorm ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's something odd going on inside Telegraph writer Emma Barnett's boyfriend's pants. She might never have discovered it had he not left his trousers on the bedroom floor this weekend, and had a peculiar message on the care instructions not caught her eye. Apparently Madhouse trouser wearers can go one of two routes in washing their pants: the old "machine wash/tumble dry" one or, as Madhouse implores dudes: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/9125574/Sexist-trousers-are-below-the-belt.html">"Give it to your woman – it's her job."</a></p><p>Much like J.C. Penney's recent<a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/08/jc_penneys_too.php"> "Too Pretty to Do Homework"</a> shirts or, more revoltingly, Topman's  line of <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100105347/why-are-feminists-getting-their-knickers-in-a-twist-about-topman-t-shirts/">rape apologist wear</a>, the revelation that somewhere, men's trousers are telling them to pawn off their dirty laundry on the nearest set of ovaries was not met with universal amusement. On Monday, Barnett<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/emmabarnett"> tweeted a photo of the tag</a>, saying she was "so shocked at this label in my boyfriend's new trousers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White conservative manhood crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/white_conservative_manhood_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/white_conservative_manhood_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12521711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent GOP assault on women's rights stems from the same fears as the racist attacks on Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh and Rick Santorum's attacks on women's reproductive rights didn't happen in a vacuum. They're part of a larger conservative backlash against women, minorities and the poor. Chauncey DeVega explains:</p><blockquote><p>Since the election of Barack Obama, the Tea Party GOP has embraced a kamikaze-like politics in which they are willing to destroy the proverbial village in order to liberate it. This appetite for destruction has reached a fever pitch during the last few weeks. Rick Santorum and the Republican Party have called for limiting women’s reproductive rights under the guise of defending “religion” from the “tyranny” of the Obama administration. <a href="http://wearerespectablenegroes.blogspot.com/2012/03/nonracist-federal-judge-says-that-mutt.html">A federal judge was caught forwarding an email</a> to his friends suggesting that Barack Obama’s conception was the product of drunken sex between his mother Ann Dunham and a dog. And Rush Limbaugh launched a viciously misogynistic attack on Sandra Fluke, a private citizen, who dared to testify before Congress in defense of a woman’s right to have equal access to birth control.</p>
<p>On the surface, these incidents appear to be unrelated. They are simply the desperate graspings and mouth utterances of an increasingly fringe and desperate Republican Party which is determined to defeat Barack Obama by any means necessary. However, these events are all symptoms of a bigger problem. In the Age of Obama, white manhood — and a particular type of conservative white masculinity — is frightened, unsettled and terrified of its obsolescence. White (conservative) masculinity finds itself in an existential crisis.</p></blockquote><p>Read more on Chauncey DeVega's <a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/chauncey_devega/2012/03/06/rush_limbaugh_and_the_crisis_in_white_conservative_manhood">Open Salon blog</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/white_conservative_manhood_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/white_conservative_manhood_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trans teens turn to YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/trans_teens_turn_to_youtube/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/trans_teens_turn_to_youtube/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12414091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new generation turns to the video-sharing site to talk about treatments and experiences, and build a community]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jazmine Khan, a transgender 15-year-old with wisps of blue hair and nails to match, is crying in her doctor's office. "I just wish I was <em>me</em> already," she says to the camera held out in front of her, and wipes away tears with her free hand. "I just wish that I could be a real girl."</p><p>Moments ago, her doctor told her that she won't be allowed to start taking estrogen to aid her full transition -- not for a long while. That means it's time for yet another shot of Lupron, a drug that suppresses testosterone production. The Canadian teen has videotaped each of her six shots thus far -- along with updates on the changes brought about by the drug -- and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/jazminekhan">posted them on YouTube</a> for the world to see.</p><p>This particular video marks a low point after a particularly difficult visit: First, her mom referred to her as a "he," then a nurse did the same. When she finally got to see her doctor, her hopes of moving on to estrogen treatment were dashed. "It's too slow," she tells the camera, angry with her doctor's caution. "They gotta make sure I'm trans? <em>Of course</em> I'm trans. Who in their right mind would go through this [otherwise]?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/trans_teens_turn_to_youtube/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/trans_teens_turn_to_youtube/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The billion-dollar battle over premenstrual disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/the_billion_dollar_battle_over_premenstrual_disorder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/the_billion_dollar_battle_over_premenstrual_disorder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12414981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long-suffering women and big pharma make uneasy allies as the American Psychiatric Association nears a call on PMDD]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For about five to seven days of every month, a woman may as feel as though she were a different person. A person she doesn’t like. Things come out of her mouth that she normally wouldn’t say, cruel things, directed at the people she loves. A soundtrack of self-loathing thoughts loop in her head. Any rejection during this period has the ability to wreak fearsome terror on her psyche. She may have sudden outbursts of sobbing, overwhelming sadness or an oceanic feeling of anxiety. One woman described the several-day sensation as though she were “being forcibly held underwater” -- and every time she came up for air, a “boot was pushing” her back down. Then, suddenly, the melancholic fog lifts, the fatigue evaporates and she is herself again. All because she got her period.</p><p>Doctors and psychiatrists at work on the newest version of the Diagnostic Manual of Mental Disorders -- the American Psychiatric Association's bible for mental-health professionals -- describe this confluence of symptoms as Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD). The revised version of the DSM, just the fourth new edition in 52 years, will be published next year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/the_billion_dollar_battle_over_premenstrual_disorder/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/the_billion_dollar_battle_over_premenstrual_disorder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscars&#8217; woman problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_oscars_woman_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_oscars_woman_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12426151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite Kathryn Bigelow and the "Bridesmaids'" breakthrough, the Oscars are still dominated by men. What gives? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood has long had a problem with women, but with Kathryn Bigelow's historic best director Oscar in 2010 for "The Hurt Locker," it looked like things might be slowly changing. And in 2011, the box-office success of "Bridesmaids," a raunchy comedy written by and starring women, led to <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/bridesmaids-effect-why-female-comedies-203160">predictions</a> that Hollywood was finally ready to recognize the reality that female-centric movies could be as profitable as man-centric movies. While no industry that employs Michael Bay can really be considered a safe space, more women in production positions might mean better depictions of women, more roles for older actresses, and more influence at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the organization that awards the Oscars.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_oscars_woman_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_oscars_woman_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

