<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:16:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Couple files groundbreaking lawsuit over child&#8217;s sexual-reassignment surgery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/couple_sues_over_childs_sexual_reassignment_surgery_in_groundbreaking_case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/couple_sues_over_childs_sexual_reassignment_surgery_in_groundbreaking_case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersex rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An intersex child's parents are suing the state for irreparable harm caused by the medically unnecessary surgery ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A South Carolina couple is suing the state for performing sexual-reassignment surgery on an intersex toddler born with both male and female reproductive organs, calling the procedure "irreversible and medically unnecessary."</p><p>The surgery was performed while the child (now aged eight, and who identifies as male) was in the state's care. The lawsuit, filed by the his adoptive parents Mark and Pam Crawford in partnership with the Southern Poverty Law Center, accuses the Department of Social Services and others of performing a "dangerous and mutilating surgery" to "radically restructure [the child's] reproductive organs in order to make his body appear to be female" without medical justification.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.wsfa.com/story/22246487/couple-sues-state-over-toddlers-sexual-reassignment-surgery" target="_blank">reported</a> by NBC News affiliate WSFA:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/couple_sues_over_childs_sexual_reassignment_surgery_in_groundbreaking_case/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/couple_sues_over_childs_sexual_reassignment_surgery_in_groundbreaking_case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Salter: &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to think of any other women on the spur of the moment here&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Salter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked about how his characters refer to women, he names a Clinton and a Kardashian, then can't remember any others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 87, James Salter is having perhaps the best year of his career. His first novel in three decades, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400043131//?tag=saloncom08-20">"All That Is,"</a> has brought rave reviews and even a <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/04/15/130415fa_fact_paumgarten">New Yorker profile.</a> It's heady, late-life success for a novelist mostly revered as a writer's writer for books like "Light Years" and "A Sport and a Pastime."</p><p>But this weekend on NPR's "All Things Considered," the latest stop on his celebratory media tour, Salter was asked by host Arun Rath about his women characters -- and he gave what might be as bizarre an answer as has any male writer these days, suddenly faced with direct questions about literature and gender that they might not have been asked before.</p><p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=182249161">Here's the transcript:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dolls for girls, science and Legos for boys: The toy aisle is still sexist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Orenstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A drugstore chain declares science is for boys -- until customers fight back on Twitter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can't do away with sexism by doing away with sexist labeling. But it's a start. So thanks, Boots. After an embarrassing kerfuffle over what it backwardly deems gender appropriate toys, the U.K. drugstore chain is moving toward a more equitable display system.</p><p>Boots' enlightenment began after Twitter user Sean E. Gray posted a photo from the store, with the caption "not impressed." It revealed the store's "Girl Toy" section, featuring princess gear and mini-tea sets, and the "Boy" section -- chock-full of Science Museum brand kits.</p><p>As the Guardian reports, Boots initially defended the placement, saying its real estate choices were based on <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317559/Boots-removes-store-signs-labellign-girls-boys-toys-customers-complain-sexism.html#ixzz2S2DdqHAN">"customer feedback" and making the stores "easier to navigate."</a> But in the face of mounting criticism, it has since retreated, promising on its Facebook page that "It was never our intention to stereotype certain toys. It's clear we have got this signage wrong, and we're taking immediate steps to remove it from store."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/dolls_for_girls_science_and_legos_for_boys_the_toy_aisle_is_still_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swedish high school institutes gender-neutral changing room</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/swedish_high_school_institutes_gender_neutral_changing_room/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/swedish_high_school_institutes_gender_neutral_changing_room/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Stockholm suburb has created a changing area for students who want to avoid gender classification ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweden recently introduced the gender-neutral pronoun "hen" into official usage, scandalized the international community by suggesting that Spider-Man-loving little kids could <a href="http://now.msn.com/hen-is-new-gender-neutral-pronoun-in-sweden" target="_blank">push around baby carriages</a> for fun, and now, the country is home to a gender-free changing space for high school students.</p><p>How dare they!</p><p>Patrik Biverstedt, headmaster of the Soedra Latins upper secondary school in Sodermalm, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/25/genderneutral-changing-ro_n_3156433.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003" target="_blank">told</a> the Associated Press that the school introduced the neutral changing room at the behest of the students, who suggested it last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/swedish_high_school_institutes_gender_neutral_changing_room/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/swedish_high_school_institutes_gender_neutral_changing_room/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men may not understand women after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that men have trouble reading female facial expressions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /> Ladies: Do you often feel misunderstood by men? Do they fail to pick up on fairly obvious nonverbal signals, such as expressions of fear or disgust? <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060278" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests your perception is entirely valid — but it’s not his fault.</p><p>A study from Germany finds that men do a much better job of interpreting one vital set of signals — the emotions conveyed by the eyes — when they’re communicating with another man, compared to another woman.</p><p>“The finding that men are superior in recognizing emotions/mental states of other men, as compared to women, might be surprising,” a research team led by psychiatrist <a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Boris_Schiffer/" target="_blank">Boris Schiffer</a> reports in the journal PLOS ONE. They add, however, that it makes considerable sense in evolutionary terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit alleges Texas employer barred men and women from being alone together</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/lawsuit_alleges_texas_employer_barred_men_and_women_from_being_alone_together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/lawsuit_alleges_texas_employer_barred_men_and_women_from_being_alone_together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women at work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kimberly A. Elkjer claims that the gender segregation policy prevented women from advancing at Scheef &#038; Stone LLP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimberly A. Elkjer, a partner at Scheef &amp; Stone LLP, is suing the Dallas-based law firm over a policy that banned male and female employees from working alone together. The suit alleges that in-office gender segregation, and the firm's no-fraternization policy that prohibited socializing outside of work, prevented women from being promoted at the same rate as their male colleagues.</p><p>As <a href="http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2013/04/09/kimberly-elkjer-fraternization-lawsuit/" target="_blank">reported</a> by Claire Gordon at AOL News:</p><blockquote><p>While the rules are no longer in effect, Elkjer's lawsuit says, they created a segregated culture that persists -- a culture that denies female attorneys the same opportunities for business and for raises as their male colleagues, and hurts their ability to work. This violates the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act, her suit states, which prohibits employers from making decisions that harm the "terms, conditions, or privileges" of employees on the basis of gender.</p> <p>"If their concern was harassment or something, you wouldn't do that to African American employees," says [attorney Amy] Gibson. "'We're afraid someone will accuse us of racial harassment, so white employees can't be alone with African American employees.' That's crazy..."</p> <p>Elkjer had raised her grievances with the firm for more than six months, according to her lawsuit, but faced hostility from the powers-that-be. She says that much of culture that she's describing comes from "the example set by one or more of the firm's managing equity partners." The lawsuit wasn't specific about the exact wording or rationale of the policy, or the years that it was in effect. Gibson says that she's concerned about violating the firm's confidentiality policy, which was brought to her attention -- in a manner she found "threatening" -- not long before she filed suit.</p></blockquote><p>In a statement, Scheef &amp; Stone said there is "no evidence" to support Eljker's allegations, and that the firm is "fully prepared to defend this case."</p><p>"In fact, objective evidence and our business records will clearly show that Ms. Elkjer disagrees with legitimate business decisions," the statement said, "based on objective non-discriminatory criteria by the firm's management that have nothing to do with gender and apply to all attorneys in the firm."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/lawsuit_alleges_texas_employer_barred_men_and_women_from_being_alone_together/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/lawsuit_alleges_texas_employer_barred_men_and_women_from_being_alone_together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Talking about a female candidate&#8217;s appearance hurts her chances of winning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/study_talking_about_a_female_candidates_appearance_hurts_her_chances_of_winning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/study_talking_about_a_female_candidates_appearance_hurts_her_chances_of_winning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers found that the more media attention a woman received for her looks, the less likely she was to win ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.nameitchangeit.org/blog/entry/name-it.-change-it.-releases-new-research-on-appearance-coverage-of-women-c" target="_blank">study</a> released on Monday by Name It, Change It, a project that monitors media coverage of female political figures, revealed that appearance-focused media attention negatively impacts the likelihood that a female candidate will win an election.</p><p>The survey interviewed 1,500 likely voters about two fictional candidates, "Dan Jones" and "Jane Smith." The interview subjects were split into groups, some of which received materials on both candidates that did not mention any of their physical attributes while others received materials that either included neutral, negative and positive appraisals of Smith's appearance:</p><blockquote><p><strong>Neutral description</strong>: Smith dressed in a brown blouse, black skirt, and modest pumps with a short heel…</p> <p><strong>Positive description</strong>: In person, Smith is fit and attractive and looks even younger than her age. At the press conference, smartly turned out in a ruffled jacket, pencil skirt, and fashionable high heels….</p> <p><strong>Negative description</strong>: Smith unfortunately sported a heavy layer of foundation and powder that had settled into her forehead lines, creating an unflattering look for an otherwise pretty woman, along with her famous fake, tacky nails.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/study_talking_about_a_female_candidates_appearance_hurts_her_chances_of_winning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/study_talking_about_a_female_candidates_appearance_hurts_her_chances_of_winning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How to Create the Perfect Wife&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The true story of man who raised an orphan to be his ideal woman -- and got more than he bargained for]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Dying Negro" -- the first major anti-slavery poem in English -- was the talk of London in the summer of 1773. Although the bestselling pamphlet was published anonymously, a wealthy young political progressive named Thomas Day let it be known that he was the author. Over the next decade and a half, Day would become a familiar and fiery public voice on behalf of abolition and the independence of the American colonies, as well as an early campaigner against cruelty toward animals. He would also write a hugely popular children's novel, "The History of Sandford and Merton." But, as Wendy Moore observes in her transfixing new book on Day, in the year "The Dying Negro" was published, few readers "would have suspected that its chief author secretly maintained a teenage girl who was completely subordinate to his commands and whims."</p><p>The title of Moore's book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0465065740/?tag=saloncom08-20">"How to Create the Perfect Wife,"</a> explains what Day was up to. From an early age -- sniffing at the revelry in that 18th-century party school, Oxford -- Day knew exactly how he intended to live. He planned to commit himself to "the unremitting practice of the severest virtue." He would adopt an austere existence in the country, thinking, reading, writing and doing good works, while receiving few visitors. The one thing he required to achieve this nirvana was a mate, and for that, too, he had something very particular in mind.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;m not a feminist, but&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These forces of nature may "run the world," but they won't cop to the F-bomb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Beyoncé's fierceness <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/twitter_suspects_beyonce_fierceness_caused_super_bowl_blackout/" target="_blank">practically blew the lights</a> out at the Super Bowl this year. Madonna's decades-long career choices have landed her on the Catholic Church's <em>and</em> the Kremlin's <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-398931/Vaticans-fury-Madonna-blasphemy.html" target="_blank">enemies</a> <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2190670/Madonna-sued-millions-Russians-offended-support-gay-rights-concert.html" target="_blank">list</a>. Sandra Day O'Connor was responsible for crucial votes in Supreme Court rulings on abortion and affirmative action. These are women who are virtual forces of nature, whether or not you agree with them on every issue.</p><p dir="ltr">So why does the word "feminist" scare them so? Don't they know that, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/why_are_women_scared_to_call_themselves_feminists/" target="_blank">per Salon's Mary Elizabeth Williams</a>: "If you believe in the strength of women ... you’re soaking in feminism"?</p><p dir="ltr">A list of other high-profile, force-of-nature women who may "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBmMU_iwe6U" target="_blank">run the world</a>," but won't cop to the F-bomb.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/im_not_a_feminist_but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Men more likely than women to be depressed over childlessness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural norms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A British researcher found that heterosexual men are pretty baby crazy, too ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a vast genre of movies and books dedicated to baby-crazy women on missions to get pregnant at any cost. (Consider: "What to Expect When You're Expecting," "The Switch," "The Object of My Affection," "<a href="http://bible.cc/genesis/21-2.htm" target="_blank">Genesis 16:1 - 21:2</a>," et cetera ad infinitum<em>.) </em></p><p><em></em>But you will find very few corresponding stories about heterosexual men's struggle with childlessness. And that is weird, according to researchers at Keele University. Because, as one study found, they are kind of baby crazy, too.</p><p>Researcher Robin Hadley carried out a <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130403071957.htm" target="_blank">survey</a> of 81 women and 27 men who did not have children, and asked them if they wanted them. He found that men were almost as likely as women to want children -- 59 percent to 63 percent -- but actually <em>more</em> likely than women to feel depressed, angry and jealous if they didn't have them.</p><p>Of the men who wanted children, 50 percent experienced isolation because they did not have them, compared with 27 percent of women; 38 percent experienced depression, compared with 27 percent of women; and 56 percent experienced jealousy of those with children, compared with 47 percent of women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposition 8 defenders have gender anxiety</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fear of marriage as "genderless institution" guides anti-gay crew in court today. Why SCOTUS may not buy it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the Supreme Court does decide to punt on the Proposition 8 case, today's oral arguments again made something clear: Defenders of the marriage equality ban are very, very anxious about gender roles. And a majority of the Court may not be buying it.</p><p>Defenders of California's ballot referendum banning gay marriage said today in court, and in their brief, that if marriage becomes a "genderless institution," children will suffer, because gay people can't procreate without help -- or rather, because marriage evidently exists to sanctify the accidental baby-making of men and women, despite the fact that so many women and men making babies today are rejecting marriage. Yes, this is their real argument.</p><p>Making it into a "what about the children" question sounds better than hating gay people for being gay, and it also sounds better than saying that men are intended for one thing and women for another. And yet that's exactly the implication made clear before the Supreme Court today. (The child-welfare argument may not work, either, no matter how much Antonin Scalia fulminated about the "sociological evidence" being too inconclusive about the impact of being raised by gay parents -- there was swing voter Anthony Kennedy wondering aloud whether the "voices of the children" of gay people should be heard.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: Christine Quinn has a temper</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers debate: Is the story anti-woman, or pro-not being a terrible person?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 1,668-word article sparking an array of reactions, the New York Times on Tuesday digs deep into New York mayoral candidate Christine Quinn's temper. (It is a very, very bad temper, the article explains.)</p><p>Reporters Michael Grynbaum and David Chen provide a few lines in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/nyregion/in-private-quinn-displays-a-volatile-side.html?hp&amp;_r=0&amp;pagewanted=all" target="_blank">front-page story</a> to explain that Rudy Giuliani was also a political hothead and that Republican mayoral candidate Joseph J. Lhota once challenged a 77-year-old Holocaust survivor to “be a man.” The rest of the piece includes passages like this:</p><blockquote><p>A session of the <a title="More articles about City Council (New York City)" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/city_council_new_york_city/index.html?inline=nyt-org">New York City Council</a> had descended into chaos, and lawmakers were openly questioning her leadership. Ms. Quinn, the Council speaker, decided there was one person to blame: Betsy Gotbaum, then the city’s public advocate, who had been presiding.</p> <p>The response was sudden and fierce. Ms. Quinn summoned Ms. Gotbaum to an office nearby and, with little warning, began shouting at her in increasingly angry tones about appearing weak in front of other lawmakers.</p> <p>“You were like Bambi in there!” Ms. Quinn exclaimed, slamming her hand on a table for emphasis, according to Ms. Gotbaum, who was on crutches at the time.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/new_york_times_christine_quinn_has_a_temper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the GOP really rebrand itself as center-right?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/can_the_gop_really_rebrand_itself_as_center_right_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/can_the_gop_really_rebrand_itself_as_center_right_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The party recognizes it needs to reach a broader demographic, but it will have to undo years of exclusionary policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of the shellacking that the Republicans took in 2012 – which makes it five of the last six national elections in which they have lost the popular vote – there has been increasing discussion among the political and media elites of whether the GOP should or can reinvent itself as a responsible center-right political party.</p><p>The issue is urgent. Very little can get done in this country politically without a rough consensus in the political system.  Yet no reasonable consensus can be reached where one of the two major parties has taken on the nature of a political third party, an extremist faction on the political spectrum whose views are obviously out of date, flagrantly false and at odds with the historic values of mainstream American society.  The United States is currently in a long-term decline, which will become irreversible if causes are not addressed.  Thus, the answer to the question of whether a GOP evolution can take place is among the most important facing the nation. Let’s look at the chances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/can_the_gop_really_rebrand_itself_as_center_right_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/can_the_gop_really_rebrand_itself_as_center_right_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even gay-friendly parents still assume their kids are straight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heteronormative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child-rearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why, in this day and age, do we still fantasize about opposite-sex prom dates and weddings for our children?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started before our children were even born. My college roommate and I were pregnant with our first children at the same time -- down to the exact due date – and when we learned that I was having a girl and she was having a boy, we immediately began imagining our offspring's future together. No matter what else happened in their lives, at least the issue of a prom date, we both fancifully agreed, was settled.</p><p>Our children are both 13 now. They live in different towns and move about in different circles, and they will, when the time comes, pick their own damn prom dates. And though it should have been obvious back then -- especially for a gay-friendly, big city mom whose children would grow up going to pride parades with their lesbian aunts -- not every boy is going to go to the dance with a girl. Not every little princess dreams of marrying a prince. I had been talking about my children's world as a strictly heterosexual place while they were still in the womb, even though I knew it wasn't. But I'm trying to do better now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: More moms want full-time work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean In]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poll comes amid a national debate on women in the workplace ignited by top Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Working mothers increasingly want full-time jobs, and tough economic times might be a big reason, according to a national survey.</p><p>In the Pew Research Center study being released Thursday, researchers saw a big spike in the share of working mothers who said they'd prefer to work full time; 37 percent said that was their ideal, up from 21 percent in 2007.</p><p>The poll comes amid a national debate on women in the workplace ignited by top Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg, who writes in a new book about the need for women to be more professionally aggressive.</p><p>In "Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead," Sandberg argues that women have not made true progress in the workplace over the past decade and that they need to raise their hands more and "lean in" if they want to land more senior positions in corporate America.</p><p>The shift toward full-time work in the Pew poll, however, coincides with the recession and may have less to do with career ambitions than with financial realities.</p><p>"Women aren't necessarily evolving toward some belief or comfort level with work," says study co-author Kim Parker, an associate director at the center. "They are also reacting to outside forces and in this case, it is the economy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/study_more_moms_want_full_time_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addiction&#8217;s shrinking gender gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/addictions_shrinking_gender_gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/addictions_shrinking_gender_gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Institute on Drug Abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historically, women have had lower rates of addiction than men. But empowerment can come with a steep price]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" /></a>  The worse women have it, the better off they are. This is the lesson we might draw from looking at one (and only one) global trend: addiction. Worldwide, women have always had lower rates of drug and alcohol use and dependence than men. Butas women’s access to opportunities grows along with a<a href="http://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/WDR2012/WDR_2012_Chapter1.pdf%20"> nation’s affluence</a>, this gender gap begins to close. In fact, just as women often outstrip men in the classroom and office if given the chance, they have already forged ahead in the abuse of certain substances. It may not be the most celebratory way to mark <a href="http://www.internationalwomensday.com/">International Women's Day</a> (March 8), but the fact is, equal rights have their penalties.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/addictions_shrinking_gender_gap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/addictions_shrinking_gender_gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer report: Women hate Hooters a little less than they used to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/consumer_report_women_hate_hooters_a_little_less_than_they_used_to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/consumer_report_women_hate_hooters_a_little_less_than_they_used_to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hooters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey finds that the chain's rebranding effort might be working -- but just the littlest bit ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Times have been tough for wing-slinging "breastaurant" chain Hooters. Sales are down, orange hot pants are like <em>so </em>last season and, unfortunately, the chain is no longer the only name in the <a href="http://www.cowgirlsespresso.com/" target="_blank">see-babes-with-your-burger</a> food game.</p><p>In order to stay afloat (like boobs in the ocean), they've undertaken a pretty ambitious rebranding effort. The franchise is hoping that by creating a "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/18/hooters-redesign_n_2503130.html" target="_blank">sleek and comfortable</a>" environment and adding salads to the menu, they can attract the Chipotle-eating masses and, you know, <em>the womens</em>.</p><p>And it's maybe kind of just a little bit working?</p><p>A new brand index <a href="http://www.brandindex.com/article/hooters-woos-women" target="_blank">report</a> reveals that both men and women have a more positive opinion of Hooters than ever before. But despite minimal gains, the chain remains in hilariously low standing with both genders.</p><p>Still, the report did find that women seem to hate Hooters less than they used to. Researchers asked women to rank their feelings about the restaurant on a score from 100 to -100. In the latest round of surveys, women's impression of Hooters improved from -26 to -21. For men, the chain moved up from -3 to 2.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/consumer_report_women_hate_hooters_a_little_less_than_they_used_to/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/consumer_report_women_hate_hooters_a_little_less_than_they_used_to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;ll tell you what&#8217;s funny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bernhard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was Seth MacFarlane's shtick really sexist? Yes, and also no — he fell afoul of the mysterious rules of comedy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humor is a complicated phenomenon, and highly dependent on context, as <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/seth_macfarlane">Seth MacFarlane</a> recently learned. The Oscar host’s much-discussed performance – and in particular his quasi-ironic opening musical number, “We Saw Your Boobs” – has inadvertently launched a cultural debate about several interlocking subjects, including sex and gender in Hollywood, whether p.c. attitudes are destroying humor, and the role of Twitter and other social media during major cultural events. That’s without even getting into the unresolvable and inherently subjective question of what’s funny and what’s not.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/ill_tell_you_whats_funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must Do&#8217;s: What we like this week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Listener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garry wills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betty Friedan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Duchovny loses a nuclear sub, Rebecca Hall fills the "Downton" void, and Betty Friedan ignites a movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BOOKS</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.railrode.net/2013/02/24/the_myth_of_persecution_early_christians_werent_persecuted/myth_of_persecution/"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/02/myth_of_persecution.jpg" alt="" title="myth_of_persecution" class="size-full wp-image-13209635" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_myth_of_persecution_early_christians_werent_persecuted/">Laura Miller</a> dug into Candida Moss' scholarly work on Christianity's obsession with martyrdom, titled <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0062104527/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Myth of Persecution: How Early Christians Invented a Story of Martyrdom."</a> She writes:</p><blockquote><p>"Moss is thorough, strives for clarity and is genuinely fired up in her concern for the influence of the myth of martyrdom on Western societies. 'The idea of the persecuted church is almost entirely the invention of the 4th century and later,' she writes. This was, significantly, a period during which the church had become 'politically secure,' thanks to Constantine. Yet, instead of providing a truthful account of Christianity’s early years, the scholars and clerics of the fourth century cranked out tales of horrific, systemic violence. These stories were subtly (and not so subtly) used as propaganda against heretical ideas or sects. They also made appealingly gruesome entertainment for believers who were, personally, fairly safe; Moss likens this to contemporary suburbanites reveling in a horror film."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/must_dos_what_to_watch_and_read_this_weekend_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women and the investment gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/women_and_the_investment_gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/women_and_the_investment_gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than ever, women are breadwinners and budget-makers for their household. So why aren't they investing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a third of American women are now their <a href="https://docs.google.com/a/salon.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:ixGiMqOUMxsJ:www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2012/04/pdf/breadwinners.pdf+&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESgRRna4UP7QlnvFB4eSUBTDOkabEx1m40fzVcsjJKyxA3UhUKiP9FhCuH7JDI1kKeNEAllZLBB34PPjLbEGkfXBPkS1eTZyddygo-rwB7dvg16Tv9NJn1HYZR8QtajBYA4V4s9p&amp;sig=AHIEtbRFMiriZtWSqy2k1wC_7Gop0W8qAA" target="_blank">family breadwinner</a>. Women with college degrees <a href="http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb11-72.html" target="_blank">far outnumber</a> their male counterparts in the workforce. And surveys reveal that around <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-05-06/business/sc-cons-0505-save-women-finances-20110506_1_finances-household-td-ameritrade" target="_blank">90 percent of women</a> identify themselves as the primary bill-payer and budget-maker for their household. But despite all of this, women continue to lag behind in investing and long-term financial planning.</p><p>So what gives?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/women_and_the_investment_gap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/women_and_the_investment_gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
