<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gender Gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gender_gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This is what the gender gap in Congress really looks like</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[113th congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender disparity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cheerfully illustrated guide to the 113th Congress' shocking gender disparity ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artist <a href="http://cargocollective.com/nemens" target="_blank">Emily Nemens</a> has created a <a href="http://lookingatdemocracy.org/submissions/14119-women-of-the-112th-and-113th" target="_blank">lovely infographic</a> to illustrate a not-so-lovely point: Congress has a major gender problem.</p><p>A full screen version of Nemens' illustration can be found <a href="http://womenofthe113th.tumblr.com/post/47884617409/modification-of-the-last-infographic" target="_blank">here</a>. More on the history of women in Congress can be found <a href="http://history.house.gov/Exhibition-and-Publications/WIC/Women-in-Congress/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter"> <dl id="attachment_13298562" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 627px;"> <dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/infographic/" rel="attachment wp-att-13298562"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/infographic-617x1024.jpg" alt="" title="infographic" class="size-large wp-image-13298562" height="1024" width="617" /></a></dt> <dd class="wp-caption-dd"></dd> </dl> </div><p style="text-align: center;"> <p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex (ratios) and the single girl</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sex_ratios_and_the_single_girl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sex_ratios_and_the_single_girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex selective elimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Far from a dating paradise, a gender gap can prove dangerous for women in cities and rural areas around the world ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid all of the current Internet <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/how_not_to_die_alone_in_the_internet_age/" target="_blank">chatter</a> about the perils of being a single woman, a recent piece in the New York Times shines a light on a different, more sinister, hazard.</p><p>The Times' John Eligon <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/us/16women.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=0&amp;hp" target="_blank">reported</a> on a small oil town in North Dakota where “men are many, and women are hounded." The oil-rich pastures of Williston have attracted hordes of young men to work the lucrative, labor-intensive jobs that get the wells flowing. As a result, there are 1.6 single men for every single woman in Williston, a gender ratio that has created a stifling and dangerous environment.</p><p>According to Eligon:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sex_ratios_and_the_single_girl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sex_ratios_and_the_single_girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Performance counts more than connections for women on Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13162115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to climbing the corporate ladder, it's what you know for women -- and who you know for men ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Economic Association <a href="http://www.aeaweb.org/aea/2013conference/program/meetingpapers.php" target="_blank">finds</a> that it's more difficult for women to succeed on Wall Street than for men. What's more surprising is that they succeed in different ways: It's <em>what </em>you know that counts most for women and <em>who </em>you know for men (bold text mine):</p><blockquote><p>Male and female analysts are equally connected on average. <strong>Connection is associated with more accurate earnings forecasts for men, but not for women.</strong> Controlling for accuracy, connection is important in explaining men’s, but not women’s, probability of being voted by institutional investors as “star” analysts, an important measure of career success. <strong>For women, education achievements and accurate forecasts are important factors that determine voting outcomes.</strong> This asymmetry in the effect of connections between the two genders does not exist in an alternative, computerized process of evaluating analysts, and is most pronounced among young analysts. Our results suggest that men reap higher returns from connections than women, and that investors are more willing to rely on soft information such as connections to evaluate men than women.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/report_on_wall_st_performance_counts_more_than_connections_for_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama losing women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/are_women_deserting_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/are_women_deserting_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13035150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the debate, the president chose to lay off GOP extremism. Polls suggest he's paying the price]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After weeks of polling showing Barack Obama leading nationally with female voters, sometimes by nearly 20 points, we now have at least two polls taken after last week's debate suggesting that Mitt Romney is narrowing the gender gap. Which leaves everyone who wondered why Obama missed the chance at the debate to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/obamas_missed_opportunity/">define</a> Romney as an extremist on women's issues (after the Democratic convention <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/dems_to_ladies_you_are_important/">centered</a> very successfully around such issues) feeling grimly validated.</p><p>Most prominently, a Pew survey found that Obama and Romney were now <em>tied</em> among likely women voters, compared to their mid-September poll, which showed Obama besting Romney with women by 18 points. And a PPP poll commissioned by Daily Kos and released today <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/09/1141812/-Daily-Kos-SEIU-State-of-the-Nation-poll-Romney-takes-the-lead-in-post-debate-period">found</a> that the president's 15-point lead with women had shrunk to 6 points.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/are_women_deserting_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/are_women_deserting_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Outnumbered by men, women don&#8217;t speak up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/study_outnumbered_by_men_women_dont_speak_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/study_outnumbered_by_men_women_dont_speak_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brigham Young University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13017229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confirming what many have long suspected, women tend not to assert themselves in male-dominated environments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.feministing.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/feministing_logo-1.jpg" alt="Feministing" align="left" /></a> A new study confirms what <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-09/byu-wsl091812.php">most of us probably already know</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Scholars at Brigham Young University and Princeton examined whether women speak less than men when a group collaborates to solve a problem. In most groups that they studied, the time that women spoke was significantly less than their proportional representation – amounting to less than 75 percent of the time that men spoke.</p></blockquote><p>This is maybe the most frustrating thing about being a feminist lady in the world every day, in my opinion. Because, as <a href="http://jezebel.com/5944642/women-speak-75-less-when-theyre-surrounded-by-dudes-and-thats-bad">Lindy West points out</a>, even loud-mouthed feminists often fall into this dynamic. “You forfeit, because their lungs are bigger, they’re groomed for assertiveness since birth, and you’re groomed to assume that nobody will take you seriously anyway. You wait for a pause in a room of interrupters.” I do this <em>all</em> the time. And the fact that I can feel myself doing it doesn’t really help usually–it just means I hate myself for it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/study_outnumbered_by_men_women_dont_speak_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/study_outnumbered_by_men_women_dont_speak_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
