<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gender Roles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gender_roles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Male grooming: The movie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From beard contests to ball cream, Morgan Spurlock's "Mansome" goofs through modern-day male narcissism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American men are bewildered about their place in the cosmos, or so we have been told repeatedly over the last 20 years. They don't know whether to thread their eyebrows or wield a welding torch, and end up trying to do both at once (which is inadvisable). As comedian Adam Carolla laments in a scene from Morgan Spurlock's documentary <a href="http://mansomethemovie.com/">"Mansome,"</a> the old-time certainties of gender identity have melted away: Women are flying fighter jets and men work at the hair salon; there are no longer "chick jobs and guy jobs."</p><p>I get that Carolla is just cracking wise, from inside the bubble of his own lame version of post-rockabilly guy-shtick -- he is interviewed inside a garage, with what looks like an orange Camaro behind him in the middle distance -- and that if you brought up the fact that those old-time "chick jobs" paid 40 to 80 percent less than "guy jobs," he'd get all irritated with you for being a drag. He's still an idiot, though, even if he's an idiot in quotation marks. That's kind of the problem with "Mansome," which tries to tackle the enormous subject of contemporary male vanity as an assemblage of whimsical anecdotes, which are often entertaining in themselves but studiously avoid any semblance of intelligent analysis or historical understanding.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/male_grooming_the_movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fifty Shades of Grey&#8221;: Dominatrixes take on Roiphe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Roiphe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12884371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, Katie Roiphe misses the point. Women aren't the only ones who find escape in submission]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about men? That was the first thought that came to mind after reading Katie Roiphe's <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/04/15/working-women-s-fantasies.html">Newsweek cover story</a> on the BDSM-themed "Fifty Shades of Grey" phenomenon, in which she controversially speculated that women's current fascination with the book's story line of female submission was the result of the "pressure of economic participation" and the "hard work" of striving for equality. The desire for submission is hardly something unique to women.</p><p>Who understands this better than professional dominatrixes? With so many speculating this week on Roiphe's article, I decided to hand the microphone over to women with a unique perspective on the dynamics in power and play.</p><p>Several said that Roiphe is actually on to something when she talks about submission as an escape from life's stresses -- only, this reasonable point is overwritten by her wrongheaded focus on women and the impact of feminism. Roiphe wonders whether there is "something exhausting about the relentless responsibility of a contemporary woman's life ... all that strength and independence and desire and going out into the world," and suggests "that, for some, the more theatrical fantasies of sexual surrender offer a release, a vacation, an escape from the dreariness and hard work of equality." What about the exhausting, relentless responsibility of contemporary <em>people's</em> lives?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lego tries to get less sexist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/lego_tries_to_get_less_sexist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/lego_tries_to_get_less_sexist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12879491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The toy maker's female-centric "Lego Friends" send a bad message for girls. But now there's hope for change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a kid, you know what we called Legos for girls? Legos. When my own young daughters were small, you know what they called them? Legos. They came in blue and red and green and yellow. But lately Legos, like damn near every other object in the toy aisle, have felt the need to assert their gender.</p><p>It started when the company began <a>aggressively marketing to boys</a> back in 2005, offering up what BusinessWeek recently described as "spaceships and laser cannons … martial arts and supernatural powers," a world in which <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/lego-sit-activists-angry-sexist-line-made-girls-article-1.1062430">"80 percent of the characters are boys."</a> But the extreme genderfication of Legos put the company in a self-imposed bind. How to respond to the demands of consumers who want a more daughter-friendly Lego? There was only one thing to do next – make some girly Legos!</p><p>Just in time for the holidays, the Danish brand rolled out a pink-themed line of Lego Friends last December, featuring curvaceous, pretty girls who play in pastel-themed, gently constructed cafes, beauty shops, puppy houses and their own little stages. That's the life of a girl for you  – looking pretty, "decorating your house" and eating cupcakes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/lego_tries_to_get_less_sexist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/lego_tries_to_get_less_sexist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s best show about women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/tvs_best_show_about_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/tvs_best_show_about_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12817341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Game of Thrones" is filled with strong female characters that -- surprise! -- have lots to say about modern sexism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second season of HBO's <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/game_of_thrones/">“Game of Thrones,”</a> which premiered last Sunday, is based on a novel — the second in an ongoing saga — called “A Clash of Kings.” But fans of the bloody, battle-scarred show know that’s a misnomer: There are more than a few queens throwing down in this brawl — not to mention a passel of noblewomen, priestesses, grizzly mamas, and badass, sword-wielding soldiers of the distaff variety.</p><p>This may be the Year of the Sitcom Woman, but the biggest, most vibrant group of women on TV today can be found in a brutal, self-serious war drama set in a made-up medieval world — just the kind of story, it so happens, that’s often assumed to be the sole dominion of dudes.</p><p>For George R.R. Martin, the novelist who created this world in his “Song of Ice and Fire” series, the medium is the message. The things that make the story so daunting and so off-putting to some — its sheer massiveness and its huge cast of characters — are part of what makes it so thrilling to me, as a woman who likes to see other women on-screen. It’s not just that the women in “Game” are strong — and the primary females are, in both figurative and literal senses — but that there are so goddamn <em>many</em> of them, each one fighting to exercise power over the world and her own life. They’re far from a sisterhood (one of the main themes of the show is that trusting others is a rube’s game) but as a collective, they make an unavoidably huge impression.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/tvs_best_show_about_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/tvs_best_show_about_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The small, sexist joke that became a big deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12526731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A crass laundry label sets off a social media firestorm ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's something odd going on inside Telegraph writer Emma Barnett's boyfriend's pants. She might never have discovered it had he not left his trousers on the bedroom floor this weekend, and had a peculiar message on the care instructions not caught her eye. Apparently Madhouse trouser wearers can go one of two routes in washing their pants: the old "machine wash/tumble dry" one or, as Madhouse implores dudes: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/9125574/Sexist-trousers-are-below-the-belt.html">"Give it to your woman – it's her job."</a></p><p>Much like J.C. Penney's recent<a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/08/jc_penneys_too.php"> "Too Pretty to Do Homework"</a> shirts or, more revoltingly, Topman's  line of <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100105347/why-are-feminists-getting-their-knickers-in-a-twist-about-topman-t-shirts/">rape apologist wear</a>, the revelation that somewhere, men's trousers are telling them to pawn off their dirty laundry on the nearest set of ovaries was not met with universal amusement. On Monday, Barnett<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/emmabarnett"> tweeted a photo of the tag</a>, saying she was "so shocked at this label in my boyfriend's new trousers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/the_small_sexist_joke_that_became_a_big_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s woman problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/obamas_phony_paternalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/obamas_phony_paternalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10303336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president shamefully uses his daughters to justify limiting the healthcare options of America's young women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will Barack Obama learn how to talk thoughtfully about women, women’s health and women’s rights?</p><p>Apparently, not today.</p><p>On Wednesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdr0KJfvjSc">unexpectedly overruled</a> the Food and Drug Administration’s recommendation that emergency contraception be sold on drugstore shelves and made available without a prescription to women under the age of 17. The move came as a surprise blow to healthcare and women’s rights activists, the kinds of people regularly counted as supporters of the Obama administration.</p><p>Today, Obama <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-defends-administrations-refusal-to-relax-plan-b-restrictions/2011/12/08/gIQAJSZbfO_story.html">doubled down</a> on his disregard for the concerns of these groups, claiming that while Sebelius made her decision without his counsel, he agreed with it. Obama pooh-poohed the findings of the FDA, which had concluded that Plan B pills posed no medical hazard and supported Sebelius’ official argument, citing a lack of confidence that “a 10-year-old or 11-year-old going to a drugstore would be able to, alongside bubble gum or batteries, be able to buy a medication that potentially if not used properly can have an adverse effect.” The logic expressed today by the president, and yesterday by Sebelius, is ludicrous: Medicines like Tylenol – which have been proven to have adverse effects in high doses – are available by the truckload on drugstore shelves, at prices far cheaper than the $30 to $50 it would cost a preteen to purchase just one dose of Plan B, let alone go wild with it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/obamas_phony_paternalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/obamas_phony_paternalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why celebrity daddy issues never disappear</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_embittered_daughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_embittered_daughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On TV and in memoirs, embittered daughters of famous men are evening scores. Why can\'t successful women let go?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <em>"But all I could think about was Daddy"</em>
  </p><p>
    <em>--Alexandra Styron, "Reading My Father: A Memoir"</em>
  </p><p>"Ocean&#8217;s Kingdom," a <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/culturemonster/2011/09/paul-mccartneys-ballet-oceans-kingdom-debuts-in-new-york.html">ballet composed by Paul McCartney</a>, with costumes by his daughter, fashion designer Stella McCartney, had its starry premiere in New York in late September, marking the first formal collaboration between a father and daughter who are famously close -- and the happy antidote to what has otherwise been the year of Embittered Daughters of Famous Men.</p><p>In recent months, we have seen high-profile memoirs by the daughters of writers Joseph Heller and William Styron. Dubbed the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/11/fashion/heller-wells-and-styron-memoirs-from-the-cubs-of-literary-lions.html?pagewanted=all">"daughterati"</a> by the New York Times, Alexandra Styron and Erica Heller both chronicled difficult, distant relationships with fathers so absorbed in their own careers and personal miseries they barely seem to notice their offspring. Jane Fonda's latest self-help book, "Prime Time," again revisits her famously prickly relationship with her aloof father -- a relationship already explored at length in her 2005 memoir (and in Patricia Bosworth&#8217;s new Fonda biography as well).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_embittered_daughter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_embittered_daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Straight male friendship, now with more cuddling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/straight_male_friendship_now_with_more_cuddling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/straight_male_friendship_now_with_more_cuddling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10103559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As homophobia declines, some heterosexual boys are getting cozier and telling each other, \"I love you, dude\"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It starts with "John" hugging "Leo" tightly. Then, a few snapshots into the Facebook photo album, the baby-faced 16-year-old softly kisses his friend on the cheek. It culminates with a shot of the British teens holding up their shirts to reveal their tanned, washboard stomachs and the elastic waistbands of their designer underwear. On the boys' respective profiles they leave each other comments reading, "I love you," sometimes in all-caps, along with teeny-tiny heart icons.</p><p>These may seem like startling displays of same-sex affection and innuendo for a pair of heterosexual teenage boys -- even despite their blow-dried Justin Bieber bangs -- but Eric Anderson, an American sociologist, says it's part of a larger trend among teens and young adults.</p><p>"It is normal in the United Kingdom for young straight boys to sleep in the same bed, frequently, and to cuddle," says Anderson, who has primarily focused his research on white males living above the poverty line. In a recent study, he found that 90 percent of heterosexual undergraduate men in the U.K. had at least once kissed a straight male friend on the lips. Things are not so fluid in the U.S. -- he found 7 percent of heterosexual college guys had smooched a straight male pal -- but his in-depth studies of American jocks and frat boys, those expected to be the most homophobic, have revealed them to be increasingly comfortable with same-sex physical and emotional intimacy, he says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/straight_male_friendship_now_with_more_cuddling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/straight_male_friendship_now_with_more_cuddling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should marriage last forever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/why_marry_forever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/why_marry_forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA['Til death do us part is so permanent. Does Mexico City have a good idea with renewable marriage contracts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you live in a place with a 50 percent divorce rate, is "till death do you part" even a realistic concept? In a radical rethinking of matrimony, Mexico City's assembly is mulling a proposed civil code reform that would enable the city to issue <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/americas/mexico-mulls-two-year-marriages-drawing-ire-of-catholic-church/article2185712/">marriage licenses with time limits.</a></p><p>The idea, explains assemblyman Leonel Luna, is to help couples avoid "the tortuous process of divorce." Instead, couples could opt for a renewable contract for a minimum two-year term, complete with provisions for the division of assets and custody of children. "If the relationship is not stable or harmonious," Luna says, "the contract simply ends." Luna says there could be a vote on the new marriage contracts by the end of the year.</p><p>Unsurprisingly, the Catholic Church, still fired up over Mexico City legalizing same-sex unions in 2009, is none too pleased with the move. Mexican archdiocese spokesman Hugo Valdemar told Reuters this week that "This reform is absurd. It contradicts the nature of marriage. It's another one of these electoral theatrics the assembly tends to do that are irresponsible and immoral." Because anything other than a lifetime binding contract between a man and woman is hooey!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/why_marry_forever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/why_marry_forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What fantasy football taught me about guys</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/women_fantasy_football/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/women_fantasy_football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The League]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2011/09/08/women_fantasy_football</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As football season opens, a female fan of FX's "The League" joins one of her own to glimpse the secret world of men]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three rounds into my fantasy football draft last week, my co-manager and I were cruising. We'd snagged Kansas City Chiefs running back Jamaal Charles, Atlanta Falcons wide receiver Roddy White and Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Mike Wallace, in that order, when we made a critical error. Under time pressure, we failed to double-check that we had the right player highlighted in Yahoo's fantasy system and accidentally took Carolina Panthers quarterback Derek Anderson. The deep boneheadedness of wasting a fourth-round pick on a quarterback I wouldn't have even considered as a backup was a new kind of agony for this fantasy newbie. In an effort to move beyond narrow, team-based rooting -- and an experiment in guy culture -- I decided to kick in $50 and help run a team, and to take FX's fantasy-football sitcom "The League" as my guide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/women_fantasy_football/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/women_fantasy_football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One case where market forces actually work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/09/equality_and_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/09/equality_and_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/08/09/equality_and_sex</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests gender equality leads to more sex. But can supply and demand really explain love?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea that "gender equality means more sex" seems like a slogan cooked up by cynical young feminists. Instead, it's the conclusion of a recent study by social psychologist Roy Baumeister of Florida State University -- and politically correct it is not.</p><p>His study, "Sexual Economics: A Research-Based Theory of Sexual Interactions, or Why the Man Buys Dinner," was presented Sunday at the American Psychological Association and shows that countries with greater gender equality have higher rates of sexual activity. With parity comes a greater likelihood of casual sex and more sexual partners. This might seem like excellent news, just one more argument in favor of equality -- and it is! But it also paints a mathematical, emotionless portrait of relations between the sexes.</p><p>Instead of using evolutionary or social constructionist theories, Baumeister turns to economic principles to explain sexual behavior. The result is a world where women use sex to get what they want from men -- whether it's a free dinner or a lifetime commitment. It's similar to an argument made by Mark Regnerus, author of "Premarital Sex in America: How Young Americans Meet, Mate and Think About Marrying," who <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/01/19/young_women_romance">talked to me</a> earlier this year about his belief that feminist advances have driven down the price of sex to an all-time low in the U.S.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/09/equality_and_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/09/equality_and_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/pop_five_pizza_hut_drag_queen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/pop_five_pizza_hut_drag_queen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/13/pop_five_pizza_hut_drag_queen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: Russian cigarettes market teen sex, Netflix across the nation, and Pizza Hut's drag dilemma]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Drag of the day:</strong> Pizza Hut allegedly kicked out a patron in Wallace, N.C., for <a href="http://eater.com/archives/2011/07/12/pizza-hut-kicks-out-man-because-he-was-in-drag.php">entering the chain restaurant in a dress</a>. The managers say what bothered them was the guy never ordered anything.</p><p><strong>2. Movie nation of the day:</strong> New site <a href="http://slacktory.com">Slacktory</a> has a great chart of <a href="http://slacktory.com/2011/07/united-states-netflix-local-favorites/">the most popular Netflix film</a> for each state.</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10055224' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/07/Micah-Mertes-US-Netflix-local-faves.jpg' />
  </p><p>I can't really tell, but I'm pretty sure Delaware's is "Final Destination."</p><p><strong>3. Mila and the Marine update of the day:</strong> Welp, it looks like <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/07/11/mila_kunis_marine_ball">their date</a> might not be happening, because <a href="http://hypervocal.com/news/2011/update-turns-out-mila-kunis-will-not-be-attending-that-marine-corps-ball/">Kunis is super-duper busy</a>. But maybe it will anyway? Stay tuned!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/pop_five_pizza_hut_drag_queen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/pop_five_pizza_hut_drag_queen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Louis C.K. is wrong to defend Tracy Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/louis_c_k_defending_tracy_morgan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/louis_c_k_defending_tracy_morgan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy Morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/17/louis_c_k_defending_tracy_morgan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Louie" star tries to place the blame for homophobic comments on the people offended by them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis C.K. went on a rampage today in defense of Tracy Morgan. Previously, Louis <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/15/pop_five_muholland_drive_club">had taken to Twitter</a> to publicly stand behind the <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/14/tracy_morgan_atones_for_homophobic_routine">homophobic jokes that Morgan has already apologized for</a>, and during an interview with Slate he continued to attack Tracy's attackers using <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2297174/pagenum/all/#p2">some less-than-sound arguments</a>.</p><blockquote>
<p>"And people heard this Tracy shit mostly third-hand. He didn't stand on a public stage and say this stuff. He didn't make these announcements: 'Here, America, are my views.' Where you say something makes a huge difference about what you say and what it means and what you let yourself say&#8230;And I think the person who really fucked people up and hurt people with Tracy's words was whoever took it out of that Nashville club and put it on the national stage -- whoever called Huffington Post or whoever started this shit, and said, 'Guess what Tracy Morgan said,' and announced it to the rest of the world. He wasn't trying to say it to the rest of the world. So when I read stuff like, How are gay people going to feel when they read this? Well they didn't have to read it! They weren't part of that show. Maybe there were gay people there who were laughing. You don't fucking know. Nobody gets to say that they represent anybody and they're offended on behalf of the whole world."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/louis_c_k_defending_tracy_morgan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/louis_c_k_defending_tracy_morgan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gwyneth Paltrow, homosexuality, the Bible and GOOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/gwyneth_paltrow_goop_homosexuality_bible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/gwyneth_paltrow_goop_homosexuality_bible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/06/09/gwyneth_paltrow_goop_homosexuality_bible</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actress/advocate's misguided attempt to understand religious intolerance goes off track]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwyneth Paltrow has <a href="http://goop.com/newsletter/134/?utm_source=Goop+Newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=8d9bc21fa4-Goop134_06_09_2011&amp;utm_medium=email">devoted this week's GOOP newsletter to the issue of homosexuality in the Bible</a>. She wants to know exactly what that book says that gives people -- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/27/clint-mccance-anti-gay-facebook_n_774656.html">like that Arkansas board member she saw on TV a couple of months ago</a> -- the right to tell kids they should kill themselves if they are gay. Somehow, she raises the question in a way that is not obnoxious or sanctimonious, which is hard for anyone dealing with Bible debate, but I imagine especially hard for Ms. Paltrow:</p><blockquote>
<p>This concept, while foreign to me, is interesting, as it used to justify so much judgement and separation in our society. When my daughter came home from school one day saying that a classmate had two mommies, my response was, "Two mommies? How lucky is she?!" What does it actually say in the bible that will cause some people to be upset by my line of thinking?</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/gwyneth_paltrow_goop_homosexuality_bible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/gwyneth_paltrow_goop_homosexuality_bible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News: &#8220;Sesame Street&#8221; pushing liberal gay agenda?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean Hannity hosts a bonkers segment on how Elmo and Big Bird are turning your children into homosexual Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;Today's episode of "The Sean Hannity Show" has been brought to you by the letter "L" and the number "4." The L stands for "liberal," boys and girls, which is what our nation's beloved children's program is trying to turn tykes into with its secret pro-gay, Democratic agenda. Four is how many people Fox News could scrounge up to support this Falwell-cy.</p><p>
    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3Ypsojc5vFg" width="425"></iframe>
  </p><p>Leaving aside the rehashed argument that <s>"Teletubbies"</s> "Sesame Street" is a liberal attack on family values, can we talk about how Ben Shapiro's first sentence on the show was, "Yeah, I kind of want to take them out back and cap 'em." What? Hopefully, he is talking about Big Bird and Elmo and not the children that Hannity said were going to hate the conservative author/pundit after his book comes out. Family values!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Takei responds to &#8220;Don&#8217;t Say Gay&#8221; bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/19/george_takei_gay_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/19/george_takei_gay_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/19/george_takei_gay_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that teachers in Tennessee aren't allowed to discuss homosexuality, Sulu has come up with an alternative]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of today, the Tennessee state Senate Judiciary Committee is still out on its verdict for SB 49, or <a href="http://blogs.tennessean.com/politics/2011/senate-approves-bill-to-study-sex-ed-curriculum/">the "Don't Say Gay" bill</a>. Sadly, this isn't what it sounds like, which would be legislation to prohibit the use of the word "gay" as a slur. Instead, the bill, an initiative pushed by state Sen. Stacey Campfield for the past six years, makes it a crime for teachers to talk about homosexuality to their students from kindergarten to eighth grade. Which, incidentally, was the grade 13-year-old Asher Brown was in <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&amp;id=7695982">when he took his own life, due to relentless gay bullying</a>. But sure, let's just bury this conversation in the closet until high school; no one will get teased or feel ostracized then, right?</p><p>Luckily, <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/03/31/george_takei_rules">awesome actor and human being</a> George Takei has a solution. In a new video posted in reaction to SB 49, the "Star Trek" star urges teachers, "Don't say gay ... say Takei!"</p><p>
    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dRkIWB3HIEs" width="425"></iframe>
  </p><p>Amazing. I'm starting to get my outfit ready for Takei Pride Week as we speak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/19/george_takei_gay_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/19/george_takei_gay_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the fat guy should lose his privilege</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/fat_guy_privileges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/fat_guy_privileges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2011/04/29/fat_guy_privileges</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our culture, male obesity is considered innocuous -- or even beneficial. But when it comes to women ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>Obesity is a national health crisis ... If current trends continue, it will soon surpass smoking in the U.S. as the biggest single factor in early death, reduced quality of life and added health care costs ... Obesity is responsible for more than 160,000 excess deaths a year ... The average obese person costs society more than $7,000 a year in lost productivity and added medical treatment." <em>&#8212; Scientific American, January 2011</em></p>
</blockquote><p>Considering those troubling statistics, Advertising Age's headline this week is welcome news: "Weight Watchers Picks a New Target: Men." The story details how the nation's biggest diet company is using the NBA playoffs to launch its first male-focused advertising campaign. Sounds great -- except for one thing: Why only now?</p><p>This is a significant question in a country whose debilitating weight problem is more male than female -- and "more" means a heckuva lot more. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, almost 70 percent of men are overweight, compared with 52 percent of women. Yet, somehow, 90 percent of the commercial weight-loss industry's clients are female, and somehow, this industry hasn't seen males as a viable business. How can that be?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/fat_guy_privileges/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/fat_guy_privileges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gloria Allred&#8217;s press conference for baseball coach&#8217;s gay slurs gets weird</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/atlanta_braves_gay_slur_tmz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/atlanta_braves_gay_slur_tmz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/28/atlanta_braves_gay_slur_tmz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do we even begin to explain the utter absurdity of this event?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger McDowell, pitching coach for the Atlanta Braves, is in hot water after allegedly hurling <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=AiijY.ZT10KJajAGbwHQWhkRvLYF?slug=ap-bravescoach-fan">more homophobic comments than baseballs at batting practice last weekend</a>. Not only did he make lewd remarks to a group of men in San Francisco, where the Braves were taking on San Francisco Giants, but he took his bat and made a couple sexual gestures as well. McDowell has already apologized for his remarks and actions, but it looks like another fan, Justin Quinn of Fresno, will be taking action against McDowell for threatening him in front of his twin 9-year-old daughters.</p><blockquote>
<p>Quinn, who was down in front of the field, then shouted, "Hey there are kids out here," he said during a news conference at the Los Angeles office of noted attorney Gloria Allred.</p>
<p>Quinn alleged that the coach replied that kids don&#8217;t belong at a baseball park, picked up a bat, walked up to Quinn and asked him, "How much are your teeth worth?"</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/atlanta_braves_gay_slur_tmz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/atlanta_braves_gay_slur_tmz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: 10 pieces of culture we&#8217;re on the fence about</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/16/pop_torn_jay_z_glee_dinosaur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/16/pop_torn_jay_z_glee_dinosaur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/04/16/pop_torn_jay_z_glee_dinosaur</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we're ambivalent toward the future of gay wrestlers, Velociraptor puppets, and gifts from Nicolas Cage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't want to be one of those people who talk about the weather a lot, but I hate how spring is acting like such a little tease lately. One day it's warm, one day it's freezing. Make up your mind, already! Then again, how can I blame the winds for being indecisive when I can't even figure out how I feel about some of this week's biggest stories in entertainment? Touch&#233;, me.</p><p><strong>1. Rebecca Black's "Friday"</strong> <a href="http://popcrush.com/glee-rebecca-black-friday-cover/"><strong>to be covered on "Glee"</strong></a><strong>:</strong> It makes sense when you think about the concept of "Glee" as a metaphor for Black's trajectory: a group of teens hated by the rest of their high school for singing annoying songs.</p><p><strong>2. Nic Cage in trouble with IRS for</strong> <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/04/15/nic-cage-irs-extravagant-gifts-gift-tax-lien-internal-revenue-service-nicolas-cage/"><strong>giving too many gifts</strong></a>: Oh, what, they're going after Santa Claus next? Nic Cage is just a really generous guy, that's all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/16/pop_torn_jay_z_glee_dinosaur/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/16/pop_torn_jay_z_glee_dinosaur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.Crew ad may be transgender baby propaganda, warns Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/j_crew_fox_news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/j_crew_fox_news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/12/j_crew_fox_news</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Painting your son's toenails may lead to a generation of gender-confused kids, warns network's site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how the homosexual fashion industry be doin': running their campaigns to destroy America's gender normativity with subversive ads for modest retail outlets like J.Crew.</p><p>Look, we're not claiming this definitely is the case, we're just taking the stance of <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/11/jcrew-ad-showing-boy-pink-nail-polish-sparks-debate-gender-identity/#ixzz1JJLUSFqo">this objective Fox News article</a> and saying that it <em>may</em> be. It <em>probably</em> is. There's like a 90 percent chance that this ad is part of the homosexual agenda, at least according to the experts we get to weigh in on the new campaign, which shows a mom painting her son's toenails with the caption "Lucky for me I ended up with a boy whose favorite color is pink. Toenail painting is way more fun in neon."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/j_crew_fox_news/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/12/j_crew_fox_news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

