<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gender Roles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gender_roles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Has Mother&#8217;s Day outlived its purpose?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American families look different. Mother's Day often brings a picket-fence nostalgia in mind, and that must change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As my four-year-old is busy arguing with me about why she should be able to color on her breakfast cereal and I’m busy trying not to kill her, it can be hard to remember that Mother’s Day began as a call for world peace.</p><p>And at the same time, as the world around us seems to change more often than my daughter changes outfits, it can be hard to not lump Mother’s Day with some nostalgic, soft-focus-sense of June Cleaver as the idealized mother image toward which we all strive.</p><p>Somewhere between the good and bad of modern society lies the real Mother’s Day — in which we must simultaneously celebrate the wonderful diversity of families in the 21st century while condemning the real violence and harm done to so many of those families every day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/has_mothers_day_outlived_its_purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are men still proposing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage and gender roles are changing dramatically -- but we still expect guys to get down on one knee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn't have much of an audience. There was a couple just out of earshot reverently staring at the horizon, and a lone crow hovering in place a couple of feet in front of us, its glossy black body effortlessly buoyed by the lift of the ocean wind. "Hey, you," I told the bird, nonchalantly. "We just got engaged."</p><p>Christopher and I had hiked four miles through the mossy Point Reyes forest to a dramatic cliff overlooking the ocean. We sat in the dirt, which was pockmarked with mouse holes and accented with ice plant in electric-pink bloom. Turquoise waves churned below and a seagull took stomach-turning dives as we read each other letters we had written moments before alongside a shady creek. These notes -- our individual expressions of why we wanted to make this commitment -- said the same things with different words. We cried, hugged and then took turns asking, "Will you marry me?" We both said yes and, hands shaking, slipped engagement rings on each other's fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wait, men fake orgasms?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erectile dysfunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book delivers surprising news about male sexuality -- including that, yes, some guys are really fooling you]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago, a 25-year-old male patient walked into Dr. Abraham Morgentaler's office with a surprising problem: He was faking orgasms.</p><p>A man faking it? Morgentaler, an associate clinical professor of urology at Harvard Medical School, had never heard of such a thing. After he got over the puzzle of how a man could effectively pull off such a ... sleight of semen, he got to the patient's motivation. As Morgentaler writes in his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805094245/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Why Men Fake It: The Totally Unexpected Truth About Men and Sex,"</a> his patient was having trouble climaxing during sex with his girlfriend, so he feigned pleasure for her benefit. He "was simply trying to do what he believed was the right thing by her."</p><p>Morgentaler came to realize that faking it was more common among men than he had realized -- and that this general sexual sentiment was, too. "That is a refrain I hear regularly from men in one form or another, yet this admirable, loving aspect of male sexuality is hidden among the detritus that passes as wisdom about what men are all about," he writes. His book -- which paints a portrait of men who feel anxious about their erections, pressured into having sex and concerned about their partner's pleasure -- is all about correcting that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/wait_men_fake_orgasms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I was a kept man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/i_was_a_kept_man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/i_was_a_kept_man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex gypsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kept man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like a male fantasy: Free rent, great sex and lots of drugs. But I was wracked by guilt and inadequacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the beautiful woman at Bar 13, I probably looked like any other Brooklyn, N.Y., scenester in the winter of 2004: tight jeans, shaggy hair and a pale complexion. She sidled up beside me on the black banquette and chatted me up over blaring rock music. Self-deprecating flirtation turned to drink buying as we made grandiose pronouncements about politics and punk rock. She had majored in literature but was now living in Williamsburg and commuting to New Jersey three times a week to strip. She certainly looked the part. I was instantly attracted to her, and she knew it.</p><p>We had our first kiss in a dark corner. Before long, we were flying down the stairs of the club and climbing into the back of a cab. Within 30 minutes we would be back at her house for hours of groping and tussling, but when I asked the cabbie to pop the trunk, she asked, “What is that big, green bag you’re carrying?” I looked at my feet and confessed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/i_was_a_kept_man/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/i_was_a_kept_man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Men more likely than women to be depressed over childlessness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural norms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A British researcher found that heterosexual men are pretty baby crazy, too ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a vast genre of movies and books dedicated to baby-crazy women on missions to get pregnant at any cost. (Consider: "What to Expect When You're Expecting," "The Switch," "The Object of My Affection," "<a href="http://bible.cc/genesis/21-2.htm" target="_blank">Genesis 16:1 - 21:2</a>," et cetera ad infinitum<em>.) </em></p><p><em></em>But you will find very few corresponding stories about heterosexual men's struggle with childlessness. And that is weird, according to researchers at Keele University. Because, as one study found, they are kind of baby crazy, too.</p><p>Researcher Robin Hadley carried out a <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/04/130403071957.htm" target="_blank">survey</a> of 81 women and 27 men who did not have children, and asked them if they wanted them. He found that men were almost as likely as women to want children -- 59 percent to 63 percent -- but actually <em>more</em> likely than women to feel depressed, angry and jealous if they didn't have them.</p><p>Of the men who wanted children, 50 percent experienced isolation because they did not have them, compared with 27 percent of women; 38 percent experienced depression, compared with 27 percent of women; and 56 percent experienced jealousy of those with children, compared with 47 percent of women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/study_men_more_likely_than_women_to_be_depressed_over_childlessness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposition 8 defenders have gender anxiety</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fear of marriage as "genderless institution" guides anti-gay crew in court today. Why SCOTUS may not buy it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the Supreme Court does decide to punt on the Proposition 8 case, today's oral arguments again made something clear: Defenders of the marriage equality ban are very, very anxious about gender roles. And a majority of the Court may not be buying it.</p><p>Defenders of California's ballot referendum banning gay marriage said today in court, and in their brief, that if marriage becomes a "genderless institution," children will suffer, because gay people can't procreate without help -- or rather, because marriage evidently exists to sanctify the accidental baby-making of men and women, despite the fact that so many women and men making babies today are rejecting marriage. Yes, this is their real argument.</p><p>Making it into a "what about the children" question sounds better than hating gay people for being gay, and it also sounds better than saying that men are intended for one thing and women for another. And yet that's exactly the implication made clear before the Supreme Court today. (The child-welfare argument may not work, either, no matter how much Antonin Scalia fulminated about the "sociological evidence" being too inconclusive about the impact of being raised by gay parents -- there was swing voter Anthony Kennedy wondering aloud whether the "voices of the children" of gay people should be heard.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even gay-friendly parents still assume their kids are straight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heteronormative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child-rearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why, in this day and age, do we still fantasize about opposite-sex prom dates and weddings for our children?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started before our children were even born. My college roommate and I were pregnant with our first children at the same time -- down to the exact due date – and when we learned that I was having a girl and she was having a boy, we immediately began imagining our offspring's future together. No matter what else happened in their lives, at least the issue of a prom date, we both fancifully agreed, was settled.</p><p>Our children are both 13 now. They live in different towns and move about in different circles, and they will, when the time comes, pick their own damn prom dates. And though it should have been obvious back then -- especially for a gay-friendly, big city mom whose children would grow up going to pride parades with their lesbian aunts -- not every boy is going to go to the dance with a girl. Not every little princess dreams of marrying a prince. I had been talking about my children's world as a strictly heterosexual place while they were still in the womb, even though I knew it wasn't. But I'm trying to do better now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marlo Thomas: &#8220;It&#8217;s amazing the impact &#8216;Free to Be &#8230;&#8217; had. Yet nobody followed it up. It&#8217;s gone bad&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marlo_thomas_its_amazing_the_impact_free_to_be_had_yet_nobody_followed_it_up_its_gone_bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marlo_thomas_its_amazing_the_impact_free_to_be_had_yet_nobody_followed_it_up_its_gone_bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marlo thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free to be you and me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mary tyler moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2 Broke Girls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The feminist icon and former TV star talks about her pride in the movement, and her grief over how we've regressed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before “Girls,” “New Girl” and “2 Broke Girls,” there was “That Girl.” First premiering in 1966, it was the first sitcom about a single woman who wanted a career — an unprecedented feminist concept for TV at the time —  pitched by its star, who just happened to be carrying a copy of "The Feminine Mystique" with her to the meeting.</p><p>Hers is only one story from the huge, multifaceted women’s movement chronicled in the new three-hour documentary “Makers: Women Who Make America,” airing Tuesday night on PBS, which profiles women on the front lines of the 50-year struggle for women’s rights. Marlo Thomas, who starred as Anne Marie, the title role of ”That Girl,” appears in each of the three hours of the documentary — Hillary Clinton and Gloria Steinem are the other two stars of the documentary.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marlo_thomas_its_amazing_the_impact_free_to_be_had_yet_nobody_followed_it_up_its_gone_bad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/marlo_thomas_its_amazing_the_impact_free_to_be_had_yet_nobody_followed_it_up_its_gone_bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are men so foolish?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/why_are_men_so_foolish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/why_are_men_so_foolish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women might be less competitive, but studies show they're also smarter candidates, stock pickers and more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in human history, women and men commonly compete side by side. Most of the aggressive, ambitious, daring things we attempt to accomplish are done together.</p><p>But do men and women compete the same?</p><p>Many recent findings in scientific research reveal gender differences – differences in when they choose to compete, differences in risk taking during competition, different responses to the stress of competition, and different strategies for dealing with that stress. Men are quicker to bond with teammates; women are more willing to befriend competitors. Women are less rattled by being ranked, especially when that ranking isn’t near the top. Men are overconfident of their abilities, while women underattribute success to their own skills. Men get more competitive under time pressure, while women get less competitive under time pressure. Men rate their teammates and competitors lower in ability – women rate them higher.</p><p>But these are all averages; they don’t necessarily apply to any one man or woman. So the question remains whether these average differences are truly meaningful, especially compared to the broader spectrum of individual differences. Are those scientists making a mountain out of a molehill here? Are the nuanced differences in competitive style significant enough to actually be helpful in maximizing their performance?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/why_are_men_so_foolish/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/why_are_men_so_foolish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop calling us wives and moms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/stop_calling_us_wives_and_moms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/stop_calling_us_wives_and_moms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A petition calls on President Obama to drop his retro rhetoric about women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of President Barack Obama's State of the Union, <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/stop-using-wives-mothers-daughters-rhetorical-frame-defines-women-their-relationships-other-people/3yvcscVK">a petition</a> is taking him to task for his habit of framing women's equality as a struggle to protect the rights of "wives, mothers, and daughters." The campaign was inspired by one line in particular from last night's speech in which Obama said, "We know our economy is stronger when our wives, mothers, and daughters can live their lives free from discrimination in the workplace and free from the fear of domestic violence."</p><p>A totally righteous argument, right? But the petition, which has 716 signatures at the time of this writing, says that this sort of language is "counterproductive to the women's equality the President is ostensibly supporting." It goes on to explain, "Defining women by their relationships to other people is reductive, misogynist, and alienating to women who do not define ourselves exclusively by our relationships to others. Further, by referring to 'our' wives et al, the President appears to be talking to The Men of America about Their Women, rather than talking to men AND women."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/stop_calling_us_wives_and_moms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/stop_calling_us_wives_and_moms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do the dishes, have less sex?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/do_the_dishes_have_less_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/do_the_dishes_have_less_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13186560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study claims that couples with traditional domestic roles get busy more often -- but are they enjoying it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hang out on the Internet long enough all things become true. Just over three years ago, I <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/21/sex_housework/">wrote about</a> a survey purporting to find that the more housework a married man does, the more nookie he "gets." And now we have a new study reporting that the more housework a man does, the <em>less</em> sex he has -- at least that’s how most news outlets are reporting it. Don't you just love it when science allows you to pick and choose research that aligns with your worldview?</p><p>The study -- which bears the super-sexy title "Egalitarianism, Housework, and Sexual Frequency in Marriage" -- looked at data on more than 4,000 heterosexual married couples in the U.S. If you actually read it -- I know, wild concept -- you discover that the researchers looked at the division of “traditionally female” versus “traditionally male” household chores (i.e., washing dishes versus auto maintenance) and found that “both husbands and wives in couples with more traditional housework arrangements report higher sexual frequency.” Says co-author Julie Brines, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Washington, "The results show that gender still organizes quite a bit of everyday life in marriage.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/do_the_dishes_have_less_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/do_the_dishes_have_less_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do men respond differently to a female soldier in danger?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/do_men_respond_differently_to_a_female_soldier_in_danger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/do_men_respond_differently_to_a_female_soldier_in_danger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13184911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers find that there is no evidence showing that women wounded in combat will affect men's performance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday, outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta officially lifted the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/military_lifts_ban_on_women_in_combat/" target="_blank">military ban on women in combat</a>, opening more than 200,000 jobs, many in Army and Marine infantry units, to female soldiers.</p><p>Despite <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/women-say-they-already-serve-in-combat-roles-despite-pentagons-announcement/2013/01/26/738c4c4a-6705-11e2-93e1-475791032daf_story.html" target="_blank">ample proof</a> that women have long been serving on combat patrols in the American military, and a vast <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/01/25/map-which-countries-allow-women-in-front-line-combat-roles/" target="_blank">international precedent</a> of women on the front lines of war, the reaction to the Pentagon's announcement has been mixed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/do_men_respond_differently_to_a_female_soldier_in_danger/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/do_men_respond_differently_to_a_female_soldier_in_danger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I Do and I Don&#8217;t&#8221;: Hollywood&#8217;s marriage problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/i_do_and_i_dont_hollywoods_marriage_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/i_do_and_i_dont_hollywoods_marriage_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Do and I Don't]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeanine Basinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A film historian asks why the movies are so bad at depicting one of life's most important relationships]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is both mundane and notoriously mysterious. It is also a subject that has perplexed Hollywood from the very beginning, according to Jeanine Basinger, a film historian and author of the lively new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0307269167/?tag=saloncom08-20">"I Do and I Don't: A History of Marriage in the Movies."</a> From one of the early silent classics, F.W. Murnau's "Sunrise" (in which a seemingly happy country husband briefly contemplates murdering his fresh-faced wife so he can run off with a hussy from the city), all the way up to the lesbian couple in "The Kids are Alright," what seem like basic facts of life remain impossible to fathom. Why do two people decide to spend the rest of their lives together? Why do some of them fail, and how do others succeed? What does it mean to be married?</p><p>Basinger, chair of film studies at Wesleyan University and best known for the marvelous book "A Woman's View: How Hollywood Spoke to Women 1930-1960," specializes in the movies of the studio era; her romp through that period takes up well over two-thirds of this new volume -- the most knowing and illuminating portion. This focus is both an asset and a shame because so many of today's young cineastes are unfamiliar with or put off by movies made before 1960, and for this reason they may not appreciate "I Do and I Don't." Sometimes it's the black-and-white imagery they reject, but more often they're simply unable to read or adjust to the stylized codes of an era in popular culture that's vanishing in our collective rear-view mirror.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/i_do_and_i_dont_hollywoods_marriage_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/i_do_and_i_dont_hollywoods_marriage_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I don’t take pleasure in things I’m not good at. I’m good at sitting in a bar&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/i_don%e2%80%99t_take_pleasure_in_things_i%e2%80%99m_not_good_at_i%e2%80%99m_good_at_sitting_in_a_bar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/i_don%e2%80%99t_take_pleasure_in_things_i%e2%80%99m_not_good_at_i%e2%80%99m_good_at_sitting_in_a_bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosie Schaap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grateful dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her memoir "Drinking With Men," the New York Times drinks columnist recounts the virtues of being a regular]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 42, Rosie Schaap has already led a number of lives, all over this country and across the Atlantic, as an erudite high-school dropout and touring Deadhead,  a fortuneteller, an aspiring Irishwoman (she's Jewish), an esoteric librarian, a grad student, a community activist, a teacher, a bartender, a writer. But no matter where she was living, or how unmoored she might have been feeling, Schaap always managed to anchor herself — on a bar stool, among the men at the local pub. You might say she has a rather Irish or English approach to the bar, viewing it as a kind of community center where neighbors can convene and bring their families — Americans still see it as a den of debauchery, especially when a single woman enters its doors. Schaap is something of an expert, though, having clocked an estimated 13,000 hours in pubs, bars and taverns, she admits outright in her funny, smart-as-hell, moving memoir <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1594487111/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Drinking With Men,"</a> not one of them wasted. Because it has been inside of these establishments that she has found camaraderie, witty banter and intellectual discourse, great jokes and moving stories, and even occasional romance — forging not just fleeting pub friendships but bonds with patrons and proprietors that endure to this day. Schaap, whom I've known for several years, through mutual close friends as well as through the ethereal Facebook universe (and ongoing Lexulous matches — she is a Scrabble master, be warned), came over to my apartment in Brooklyn to invent a new cocktail for Salon, the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/toast_obamas_inauguration_with_a_gerry_mandarin/">Gerry Mandarin</a>, to inaugurate both her memoir and our president's second term, and to talk about the allure of the corner pub, the feminist act of walking into a very male space,  and how she fell in and out — and ultimately made peace — with Jack Daniel's.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/i_don%e2%80%99t_take_pleasure_in_things_i%e2%80%99m_not_good_at_i%e2%80%99m_good_at_sitting_in_a_bar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/i_don%e2%80%99t_take_pleasure_in_things_i%e2%80%99m_not_good_at_i%e2%80%99m_good_at_sitting_in_a_bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raylan Givens &#8220;Justified&#8221; my love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/raylan_givens_justified_my_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/raylan_givens_justified_my_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raylan givens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Walking Dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillbillies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cowboys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manly swagger turns me off. Except when it's paired with compassion, righteous courage — and a Stetson]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not drawn to men who swagger. In fact, I'm repulsed by them. It's long been my experience that a man who swaggers is, contrary to his walk, insecure and out to prove something by behaving as if he is a king in this world, and the rest of us are just minions. So, how then, do you explain my adoration of Deputy U.S. Marshal Raylan Givens, whose chronicles are told in the FX series "Justified"? It's hard not to argue that Raylan (played by the magnificent Timothy Olyphant — and why has this man not won an Emmy yet?) does, in fact, swagger. Raylan moves through two separate worlds as if he owns them both. But my boyfriend opines, as we keep our Tuesday 10 p.m. appointment with <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/my_love_is_justified/">"Justified"</a> each week, that what Raylan wears is not arrogance, but a "righteous swagger. Informed by self-confidence and self-history. More important accessories than any gun, badge and hat."</p><p>The gun, badge and hat (and jeans and cowboy boots) announce him. Raylan is rarely seen without his Stetson (except for an early episode in which he lost the hat in a bar fight), and his marshal's badge, which he wears on the right side of his belt, just in front of his gun holster. You might think that those things just about comprise his identity, but there you'd be wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/raylan_givens_justified_my_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/raylan_givens_justified_my_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The war on female sexuality: Is globalization to blame?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/the_war_on_female_sexuality_is_globalization_to_blame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/the_war_on_female_sexuality_is_globalization_to_blame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From New Dehli to the war on women here, sexual freedom has sparked a global conflict. An expert explains why ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women's bodies have become a global battlefield. The brutal <a href="http://world.time.com/2012/12/19/brutal-delhi-gangrape-outrages-indians-spurs-calls-for-action/">New Delhi gang rape case</a>, and the fierce protests it sparked, is just one example. From education of Afghan schoolgirls to veiling in France, female sexuality and freedom has come to symbolize a global conflict "over the nature of the self," argues David Jacobson, a University of South Florida sociologist, in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/142140754X/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Of Virgins and Martyrs: Women and Sexuality in Global Conflict,"</a> which comes out later this month. It's chiefly an ideological divide of "honor" versus "self-possession" -- or, as he puts it in the book, "who owns and control’s one’s body, especially when it comes to women: is it the individual herself or the community, through enforced practices of honor, virginity, veiling, and marriage?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/the_war_on_female_sexuality_is_globalization_to_blame/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/05/the_war_on_female_sexuality_is_globalization_to_blame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can evolution explain high heels?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Heels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Femininity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research offers an unexpected explanation for their allure -- one that has nothing to do with increased height]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Fashions in dress come and go, but a peculiar one has stayed in style for many generations, and shows no sign of fading away. It’s the <a href="http://www.randomhistory.com/1-50/036heels.html" target="_blank">high-heeled shoe</a>, which first became a fashion statement in 16th-century France, and has been a part of the modern woman’s wardrobe since the mid-19thcentury.</p><p>Ask a woman why she endures the awkwardness and discomfort, and she’ll probably respond, “They make me look, and feel, more attractive.” <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001225" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests this perception is accurate, but perhaps not for the reason you’d expect.</p><p>It’s not the artificially increased height that turns heads. Rather, it’s how such footwear changes the mechanics of a woman’s gait.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eighth grader takes on the Easy-Bake Oven</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy-bake oven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An eighth grader is petitioning Hasbro to start featuring boys in its ads for the mini-oven -- and ditch the pink]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey eighth grader McKenna Pope is sick and tired of hearing that baking is <em>girly</em>. She knows that male celebrity chefs like Jamie Oliver and Alton Brown are no strangers to perfectly flaky pie crust, and Pope's 4-year-old brother, Gavyn, is no slouch in the kitchen, either. So when he recently asked Santa for an Easy-Bake Oven, McKenna noticed that boys weren't featured anywhere in Hasbro's advertisements for the mini-oven. On top of that, it only came in two colors: purple and pink. Feeling burned by the suggestion that only girls bake, the budding activist decided to do something about it.</p><p>McKenna started a <a title="McKenna petition " href="http://www.change.org/petitions/hasbro-feature-boys-in-the-packaging-of-the-easy-bake-oven" target="_blank">petition</a> on Change.org calling on toy manufacturer Hasbro to tone down the gender-typing on the Easy-Bake Oven. The open letter to CEO Brian D. Goldner might feature a pretty adorable video of Gavyn talking about baking (and dinosaurs!), but it's not kidding around. In response to the frilly colorway for the oven, McKenna writes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you respect my sex?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/do_you_respect_my_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/do_you_respect_my_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender reassignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bisexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transsexuals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I date a regular guy, will he understand my bisexuality and my history with transsexuals?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I have a question that I really need help with. I feel I've been stuck in the same place emotionally for about a year. I'm a bisexual woman in my early 30s, and since about age 25 I've been dating exclusively women and some trans men (ftm) [female-to-male transsexuals]. I didn't do this on purpose, it just kind of happened. But for the last year or more I've had the strong desire to date a biological man. </strong></p><p><strong>I don't know why, I don't know where this desire came from, but I can't really ignore it. Like I said, it's been hanging around for a year. The problem is, I haven't acted on it because not only am I rusty in relating to men in a romantic way, I'm very afraid that I won't find a man who will truly respect my history with women. I'm afraid that most men would dismiss my history with women, and judge my past relationships as less than straight relationships. I think this may be true even of men who are generally not homophobic in any of the obvious ways. So what do I do with this fear? Please help me, because I can't seem to unstick myself. </strong></p><p><strong>Much love,</strong></p><p><strong>Lost In Wonderland</strong></p><p>Dear Lost in Wonderland,</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/do_you_respect_my_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/do_you_respect_my_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should I knock myself up?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/should_i_knock_myself_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/should_i_knock_myself_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mothering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right guy hasn't come along, but I'm ready to have a kid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I feel like my life is at a crossroads, and either direction I take is going to have major consequences.  I am 33 years old, almost 34, and I just ended my umpteenth relationship. There was nothing wrong with the guy -- we just were taking different paths.  I consider myself to be ultra-capable.  Right now, I am working for a political organization while teaching a college course and finishing my dissertation and taking on freelance work on the side.  I volunteer, I exercise, I have family and friends I love.  The only thing I have felt is missing in my life is a child.  </strong></p><p><strong>Like any woman at my age and in my situation, I always figured I would meet a man, fall in love, and have children. But, as I went out and lived my life, living overseas for a while, working in public life, extending my studies as far as they could go, it just never seemed to happen. I've dated (and dated and dated) since college, and none of them really "'clicked" with me.  I have been accused of having a "strong personality" and I like to lead -- many friends think I will probably hold office one day -- and the men I tend to associate with are just uncomfortable with that in a partner.  But I'm not writing for relationship advice.  I think I will likely meet someone someday, or maybe not, but I can't force it.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/should_i_knock_myself_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/should_i_knock_myself_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
