<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > George W. Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/george_w_bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Goldberg&#8217;s Qatari myopia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab league]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haim Saban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel-Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The columnist's attacks on Qatar reek of deep hypocrisy and reflect a Bush era worldview ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s something to be said for self-awareness, and where its absence can lead an individual. Thursday’s Bloomberg View featured an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-02/qatar-attention-starved-teen-of-the-middle-east.html">attack by columnist Jeffrey Goldberg</a> against the Persian Gulf state of Qatar, which he described as “The Attention Starved Teen of the Middle East.” Nothing should insulate Qatar or any government from harsh criticism, but Goldberg’s argument is notable for deep myopia, hysteria and essential hypocrisy.</p><p>Goldberg’s piece takes aim at, among other things, the alleged dishonesty of Qatari foreign policy. Citing Qatar’s dual policy of good relations with Israel and funding of the Hamas-led administration of the Gaza Strip, Goldberg excoriates Haim Saban – an Israeli-American and another major funder of Brookings (along with the Qatari government itself) – for his public embrace of Qatari Prime Minister Hamid bin Jasim Al-Thani. Denouncing Qatar as “seeing nothing incongruous about maintaining open contacts with Israelis while funding an organization whose declared goal is killing Israelis,” Goldberg fails to grasp the distinction between preventing the economic collapse of the Gaza Strip and of funding terrorist attacks against Israel. Qatar explicitly falls into the former category. Saban, the <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3501880,00.html">Israeli government</a> and the <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4374140,00.html">Israeli private sector</a> are willing to talk to Qatar regardless of its relationship to Hamas, so why isn’t Goldberg?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would we give up burgers to stop climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report suggests that adjusting our diet can slow global warming. Now let's see if our politics will let us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed the news, humanity spent the Earth Day week reaching another sad milestone in the history of catastrophic climate change: For the first time, measurements of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere surpassed 400 parts per million, aka way above what our current ecosystem can handle.</p><p>Actually, you probably did miss the news because most major media outlets didn't cover it in a serious way, if at all. Instead, they and their audiences evidently view such information as far less news-, buzz- and tweet-worthy than (among other things) the opening of George W. Bush's library and President Obama's jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner.</p><p>Such an appetite for distraction, no doubt, comes from both those who deny the problem of climate change and those who acknowledge the crisis but nonetheless look away from what feels like an unsolvable mess.</p><p>That sense of hopelessness is understandable. After all, some of the most hyped ways to reduce carbon emissions -- electric cars, mass-scale renewable energy power plants, etc. -- require the kind of technological transformations that can seem impossibly unrealistic at a time when Congress can't even pass a budget.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Connor: Maybe SCOTUS shouldn&#8217;t have ruled on Bush v. Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandra day o'connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case "gave the court a less-than-perfect reputation," she said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said last week that in retrospect, perhaps the Supreme Court should not have elected to rule on Bush v. Gore, the 2000 decision that ended the Florida recount in the presidential race.</p><p>"It took the case and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue," she told the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-sandra-day-oconnor-edit-board-20130427,0,1201477.story">Chicago Tribune</a> editorial board in an interview on Friday. "Maybe the court should have said, 'We're not going to take it, goodbye.'"</p><p>From the Tribune:</p><blockquote><p>The case, she said, "stirred up the public" and "gave the court a less-than-perfect reputation."</p> <p>"Obviously the court did reach a decision and thought it had to reach a decision," she said. "It turned out the election authorities in Florida hadn't done a real good job there and kind of messed it up. And probably the Supreme Court added to the problem at the end of the day."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to debunk George W. Bush&#8217;s attempts at revisionism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush revisionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your definitive guide to the Bush cronies' talking points, and why all of them are insane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every dog goes to heaven and every former president should get a shot at repairing his legacy, especially when it's as tattered as George W. Bush's. With the opening of his presidential library and museum this week, observers from former Bush officials to mainstream outlets were taking a fresh, rosy look at the Bush legacy. Some offered dopey and facially ridiculous cheerleading, while others offered more compelling suggestions to return to the Bush era with an open mind. After all, other presidents left office in a cloud only to be redeemed by history years later.</p><p>So, is this week making you feel a bit nostalgic for the Bush era? Don't. It's been almost half a decade since the 43rd president left office, and he's looking as bad as ever. Of course, that won't stop a small circle of admirers (many of whom used to be on his payroll) from trying, so here's your guide to taking on the five biggest specious pro-Bush talking points put forward this week:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>248</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The week in 10 pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Bangladesh to the banks of the Mississippi, a look at the images that defined the week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From Bangladesh to the banks of the Mississippi, a look at the images that defined the week]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Inside the Bush library and museum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George W. Bush takes a break from painting to attend his Museum's dedication ceremony]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart takes a look at the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum, "the Hard Rock Cafe of catastrophic policy decisions":</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:425825" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-25-2013/library-accomplished">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Bush speech highlights their similarities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honoring his predecessor today, Obama reminds us that on foreign policy, he's accepted much of the Bush doctrine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dedication for George W. Bush’s presidential library included the presence of one current and four former United States presidents: George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and George W. Bush himself. A number of world leaders, such as Tony Blair, Silvio Berlusconi and Ehud Olmert, were in attendance as well.</p><p>When he ran against Republican Sen. John McCain, Obama campaigned in 2008 against what he called “<a href="http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/campaign2008/obama/10.27.08.html">eight years of failed policies</a>” from George W. Bush. But, today, Obama spoke reverently about becoming a part of “the world’s most exclusive club,” a group of “living former presidents” and one that included Bush.</p><blockquote> <div> <p>We do have a pretty nice clubhouse. But the truth is, our club is more like a support group. The last time we all got together was just before I took office. And I needed that. Because as each of these leaders will tell you, <strong>no matter how much you may think you’re ready to assume the office of the presidency, it’s impossible to truly understand the nature of the job until it’s yours, until you’re sitting at that desk.</strong></p> <p>And <strong>that’s why every President gains a greater appreciation for all those who served before him</strong>; for the leaders from both parties who have taken on the momentous challenges and felt the enormous weight of a nation on their shoulders. And for me, that appreciation very much extends to President Bush. [emphasis added]</p> </div> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Bush is right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Known for her candor, the former first lady says Jeb shouldn’t run -- because “we’ve had enough Bushes.” Correct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We heard it repeatedly during the 2012 campaign and its sad aftermath for the GOP: The party’s silver lining was its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-leadership/post/the-republican-partys-deep-bench-of-rising-stars/2012/09/04/37bae364-f696-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_blog.html">“deep bench”</a> of <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/top-10-republican-presidential-contenders-for-2016-20121106">2016 contenders</a>. Paul Ryan and Chris Christie, Marco Rubio and Rand Paul, Bobby Jindal and Scott Walker -- they were younger than Mitt Romney; they brought racial and ethnic diversity; Christie would bring a little ideological diversity, too, coming from the almost extinct wing of Northeastern Republicans. 2016 promised to be a bracing, exciting battle for the new soul of the party.</p><p>So I’ve found it a sad commentary on GOP rebuilding that there’s been so much talk this week about the likelihood and desirability of a Jeb Bush candidacy. And apparently one influential Republican, his mother, Barbara, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/jeb-bush-2016-barbara-bush-90623.html#ixzz2RUyDQi1A">agrees with me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Bush: I won&#8217;t weigh in on gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I’ve made the decision to get off the stage,” he told CBS News ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, George W. Bush won't be joining the ranks of Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter by throwing his support behind marriage equality now that he is safely out of the White House. He is, as ever, his same-old, constitutional-amendment-against-same-sex-marriage-supporting self -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_four_most_interesting_revelations_from_the_hacked_bush_emails/" target="_blank">nude self-portraits</a> and image rehab efforts be damned.</p><p>In an interview with Charlie Rose on CBS News, Bush said that he wouldn't comment on same-sex marriage (after happily commenting on national security and immigration reform, it is worth noting): “Yeah, well, I’m not, I’m not weighing in on these issues, as you know, because I’ve made the decision to get off the stage. And so I’m off the stage,” he told Rose.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dem Presidents praise Bush on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/dem_presidents_praise_bush_on_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/dem_presidents_praise_bush_on_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama and Bill Clinton lauded Bush for his support for immigration reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the dedication of the George W. Bush presidential library in Dallas, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama offered praise to Bush for his efforts on immigration reform.</p><p>“I want to thank you for your efforts, when president, to reform our immigration system, and keep America a nation of immigrants and I hope that Congress will follow President Obama’s efforts to follow the example you’ve set,” Clinton said.</p><p>President Obama expanded, lauding Bush's "commitment to reaching across the aisle," and his belief "that we have to repair a broken immigration system, and that this progress is only possible when we do it together."</p><p>Obama continued:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/dem_presidents_praise_bush_on_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/dem_presidents_praise_bush_on_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton jokes about Bush&#8217;s &#8220;bathroom sketches&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bill_clinton_jokes_about_bushs_bathroom_sketches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bill_clinton_jokes_about_bushs_bathroom_sketches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush paintings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton said he thought about asking for a portrait, but "at my age I think I should keep my suit"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his speech at the dedication of the George W. Bush presidential library in Dallas, Bill Clinton joked about Bush's dog and landscape paintings -- as well as those <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_four_most_interesting_revelations_from_the_hacked_bush_emails/">nude paintings</a> of Bush himself in the shower.</p><p>"I probably shouldn't say this, but I'm going to anyway," he said. "Your mother showed me some of your landscapes and animal paintings and I thought they were great. Really great. And I seriously considered calling you and asking you to do a portrait of me until I saw the results of your sister's hacked e-mails. Those bathroom sketches were wonderful, but at my age I think I should keep my suit."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/meRm4-gzztI" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bill_clinton_jokes_about_bushs_bathroom_sketches/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bill_clinton_jokes_about_bushs_bathroom_sketches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Bush on Jeb: &#8220;We&#8217;ve had enough Bushes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former First Lady said she doesn't want her son to run for President]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former First Lady Barbara Bush says that though she thinks Jeb Bush is a strong candidate for the presidency in 2016, she doesn't want him to run. "We've had enough Bushes," she said on "The Today Show."</p><p>"He's by far the best qualified man, but no," she <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/296067-barbara-bush-weve-had-enough-bushes">continued</a>. "I really don't. I think it's a great country, there are a lot of great families, and it's not just four families or whatever. There are other people out there that are very qualified, and we've had enough Bushes."</p><p>Bush added that she doesn't think Jeb, the former governor of Florida, will run: "He's the most qualified, but I don't think he'll run."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presidential libraries are huge failures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/presidential_libraries_are_huge_failures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/presidential_libraries_are_huge_failures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expert explains why Bush's national monument will likely degenerate into an empty, wasteful, gimmicky albatross]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people who built the George W. Bush Presidential Library, which opened today, envision hundreds of thousands of tourists descending annually on Dallas to gawk at the Decider-in-Chief’s artifacts. To pore over the “War President’s” trophies. To participate, virtually, in major crises that he faced. And, of course, to leave behind – in the form of admission tickets, gift shop baubles and Texas-sized meals – as much of the economic gains they’ve made up since Mr. Bush left office as they can spare.</p><p>The former president’s harshest critics, of course, can’t imagine why anyone would want to visit such a place. The more snide – and less talented – of them make lame jokes about what books may or may not be on the shelves (it’s not that kind of library). Or which gaffes, catastrophes and tragedies from his term in office the exhibits portray (they are predictably criticism-free). Or – as he himself remarked in a recent interview – whether or not he can actually read.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/presidential_libraries_are_huge_failures/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/presidential_libraries_are_huge_failures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup: Higher approval for Presidents once they&#8217;re out of office</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except for Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a Gallup analysis, ex-Presidents tend to get higher approval ratings once they leave office - including <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/">George W. Bush</a>, and with the exception of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162044/history-usually-kinder-presidents.aspx">Gallup</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Additionally, seven of nine former presidents have had higher retrospective approval ratings than their final job approval rating as president just before leaving office. That includes George W. Bush, who earned a 47% retrospective approval rating in the November 2010 poll, the only time Gallup has measured Bush retrospectively. That rating is 13 percentage points higher than Bush's 34% final job approval rating as president in January 2009, but similar to his overall job approval average of 49%.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American presidents gather to salute W.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/american_presidents_gather_to_salute_w_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/american_presidents_gather_to_salute_w_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dedication of the George W. Bush Presidential Center marks Bush's unofficial return to the public eye]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DALLAS (AP) — All the living American presidents past and present are gathering in Dallas, a rare reunion to salute one of their own at the dedication of the George W. Bush Presidential Center.</p><p>Profound ideological differences and a bitter history of blaming each other for the nation's woes will give way — if just for a day — to pomp and pleasantries Thursday as the five members of the most exclusive club in the world appear publicly together for the first time in years. For Bush, 66, the ceremony also marks his unofficial return to the public eye four years after the end of his deeply polarizing presidency.</p><p>On the sprawling, 23-acre university campus north of downtown Dallas housing his presidential library, museum and policy institute, Bush will be feted by his father, George H.W. Bush, and the two surviving Democrats, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. President Barack Obama, fresh off a fundraiser for Democrats the night before, will also speak.</p><p>In a reminder of his duties as the current Oval Office inhabitant, Obama will travel to Waco in the afternoon for a memorial for victims of last week's deadly fertilizer plant explosion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/american_presidents_gather_to_salute_w_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/american_presidents_gather_to_salute_w_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush family furiously selling itself to Americans once again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush revisionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George W. Bush's mess of a presidency is whitewashed as Jeb airs out some unpleasant past business of his own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been enjoying the big national Reassessment of the George W. Bush Era rollout this week? It was basically promotion for his library, which opens today in <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Fallujah</span> Dallas. The Bush family and their friends/donors have been busy, giving quotes and encouraging pundits to write some "hey now that we think about it Bush was a pretty good guy" pieces. The former president himself has even been on TV (though too much reminding us of his existence might hurt those new poll numbers a bit). Today on Fox <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/04/23/my-favorite-memories-president-george-w-bush/">he will be interviewed by his former press secretary Dana Perino</a>, perhaps because Jenna Bush couldn't get let out of her contract with NBC News to conduct it instead. Matt Lauer got the live interview, Diane Sawyer the taped one.</p><p>After presidents are done being presidents, they get to build big museums about themselves, because a tradition that originally involved simply making the documents and papers and records of a president available to researchers and the public obviously became this giant, expensive, pseudo-regal tribute thing, because this is America and we're really weird about presidents.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: &#8220;Choose your own adventure&#8221; at the Bush presidential library</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/must_see_morning_clip_choose_your_own_adventure_at_the_bush_presidential_library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/must_see_morning_clip_choose_your_own_adventure_at_the_bush_presidential_library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The library inclues "interactive role-playing" "where the president hands over" power to "someone else"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although he's not invited to Thursday's dedication of the George W. Bush Presidential Library, Stephen Colbert is excited for the memorial, which displays 43,000 artifacts and 200 million e-mails that "could have almost 18 non-redacted words."</p><p>The library also "includes interactive role-playing," says Colbert, "where the president hands over the reins of power to someone else--just like he did when he was president. It's like a presidential 'Choose Your Own Adventure.'"</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:colbertnation.com:425693" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b>The Colbert Report</b> <br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.colbertnation.com/full-episodes/'>Colbert Report Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.colbertnation.com/video'>Video Archive</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/must_see_morning_clip_choose_your_own_adventure_at_the_bush_presidential_library/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/must_see_morning_clip_choose_your_own_adventure_at_the_bush_presidential_library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A George W. Bush comeback?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/a_george_w_bush_comeback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/a_george_w_bush_comeback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Katrina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush revisionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dream on. But he has to try: His party and his brother Jeb are hurt by him hiding in shame (UPDATE)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are a forgiving and forgetting people. That’s all that can explain the rise in George W. Bush’s approval ratings since he left office in 2009. Back then, he had the lowest approval rating of any departing president since Richard Nixon (who departed in a helicopter after resigning in disgrace) with a 33 percent overall approval rating. Only 24 percent of Americans approved of his handling of the recession-bound economy. As recently as last November’s election, more voters blamed Bush than President Obama for the country’s ongoing economic woes.</p><p>Now, on the eve of the opening of his presidential library and an apparent Bush-rehabilitation tour, starting with a Diane Sawyer interview Wednesday night, Bush faces a kinder, gentler American public. According to <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/poll-george-w-bush-approval-rating-2013-90484.html#ixzz2RIWt0oaf">a new ABC News/Washington Post poll</a>, Americans are now split on the former president, with 47 percent approving of his performance and 50 percent disapproving. He’s still underwater, as the pollsters say, but that’s not a bad jump in four years. He’s even climbed on the economy, with 43 percent now approving of the job he did, while 57 percent stayed tethered to the reality-based community, and still disapprove.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/a_george_w_bush_comeback/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/a_george_w_bush_comeback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>166</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantánamo&#8217;s indefensible forced feedings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/guantanamos_indefensible_forced_feedings_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/guantanamos_indefensible_forced_feedings_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forced Feeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forced Feedings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Trade Agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report reveals that prisoners on hunger strike are being subjected to a form of human rights abuse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guantánamo<strong></strong> Bay prisoners have been on a hunger strike for over two months. Some of them have, in that period, been subjected to forced feeding by medical staff in the prison. But a new report that examines the United States government’s recent history of torture and abuse of detainees in the global war on terrorism highlights hunger strikes in the prison camps and recommends that forced feeding come to an end because it is abuse.</p><p>The <a href="http://detaineetaskforce.org/">report</a> comes from a “Task Force on Detainee Treatment” formed by the Constitution Project, which describes itself as “a national watchdog group that advances bipartisan, consensus based solutions to some of most difficult constitutional challenges of our time.” The co-chair of the “Task Force” was Asa Hutchinson, a Republican who worked in the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush. James R. Jones, who helped President Bill Clinton pass the North-American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), was the other co-chair.</p><p>The Task Force took two years to develop a report on “the past and current treatment of suspected terrorists detained by the US government” during the administrations of President Bill Clinton, President Bush and President Barack Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/guantanamos_indefensible_forced_feedings_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/guantanamos_indefensible_forced_feedings_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq nearly gave me PTSD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/tk_5_partner_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/tk_5_partner_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shell Shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAND Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During my time as a contractor, I learned that it doesn't take a firefight to feel the effects of "shell shock" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was one nightmare short of PTSD.</p><p>It didn’t take much, that’s what surprised me.  No battles.  No dead bodies.  I spent just three and a half weeks as a contractor in Iraq, when the war there was at its height, rarely leaving the security of American military bases.</p><p>For several years now, Americans have become increasingly aware that a large number of veterans have gotten post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Studies estimate that at least <a href="http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG720.html" target="_blank">1 in 5</a> returning vets -- possibly as many as <a href="http://www.brightsurf.com/news/headlines/48611/Iraq_Troops_PTSD_Rate_as_High_as_35_Says_Management_Insights_StudyLawrence_M_Wein.html" target="_blank">1 in 3</a> -- have it. Less notice has been given to the huge numbers of veterans who suffer some PTSD symptoms but not quite enough to be diagnosed as having the disorder.  Civilian employees of the U.S. government, contractors, and of course the inhabitants of the countries caught up in America’s wars have gotten even less notice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/tk_5_partner_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/tk_5_partner_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>