<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > George W. Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/george_w_bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bush defends his surveillance program: &#8220;Civil liberties were guaranteed&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bush_defends_his_surveillance_program_civil_liberties_were_guaranteed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bush_defends_his_surveillance_program_civil_liberties_were_guaranteed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I put that program in place to protect the country," he said of the NSA's surveillance program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former President George W. Bush defended the NSA surveillance program that collects phone and Internet data on American citizens, arguing that when he implemented the program, "civil liberties were guaranteed."</p><p>Bush was speaking with <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/01/politics/bush-interview/?hpt=hp_inthenews">CNN</a> in an interview from Zambia, and said that there "needs to be a balance" between privacy and security, "and as the president explained, there is a proper balance."</p><p>Bush was asked about the NSA's phone and Internet surveillance program specifically, and replied: "I put that program in place to protect the country. One of the certainties was that civil liberties were guaranteed."</p><p>He also commented on Edward Snowden, who first leaked information on the program to the press. "I think he damaged the security of the country," Bush said.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bush_defends_his_surveillance_program_civil_liberties_were_guaranteed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/bush_defends_his_surveillance_program_civil_liberties_were_guaranteed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, Bush heading to the same African city</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tanzania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both will be in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania at the same time, though it's unclear whether they will meet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania (AP) — President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush are planning to be in the same city a world away from home, but the question is whether they will get together.</p><p>The Democratic president was to fly Monday into Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, the last stop on a weeklong tour of Africa that wraps up Tuesday. His Republican predecessor coincidentally also plans to be there for a conference on African women organized by the George W. Bush Institute.</p><p>Their wives plan to team up at the conference Tuesday for a joint discussion on promoting women's education, health and economic empowerment. President Bush plans to be in attendance, before delivering his own speech there the following day, after the Obamas will have left.</p><p>Initially aides said the men had no plans to meet, but Obama foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes indicated Sunday that could change. "There may be something," Rhodes said.</p><p>Having both presidents in town "sends a very positive message that both political parties in the United States share a commitment to this continent," Rhodes said.</p><p>During his African visit, Obama has credited Bush with helping save millions of lives by creating the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/obama_bush_heading_to_the_same_african_city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The government&#8217;s toothless privacy watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board has hardly any staff and doesn't even have a website]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama today is meeting with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_and_Civil_Liberties_Oversight_Board">Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board</a>, an independent government entity responsible for acting as a sort of ombudsman against government overreach when it comes to things like the National Security Agency's collection of telephone metadata for millions of Americans.</p><p>If you've never heard of the PCLOB, you're not alone. We hadn't either, and that's probably because the Bush and Obama administrations have done everything they can to keep it that way. As <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/administration/306989-obama-privacy-oversight-board-to-meet-for-first-time">the Hill's Justin Sink reports</a>, the board was created eight years ago on the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, but has "remained largely powerless" thanks to White House obstruction. Indeed, this is one of the board's first meetings, as Sink reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New link suggests George W. Bush direct descendant of notorious slave trader</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/new_link_suggests_george_w_bush_direct_descendant_of_notorious_slave_trader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/new_link_suggests_george_w_bush_direct_descendant_of_notorious_slave_trader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slave trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slate investigated the claims of two historians who claim Thomas Walker was involved in 11 slave voyages to Africa]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new three-page report in <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/life/history_lesson/2013/06/george_w_bush_and_slavery_the_president_and_his_father_are_descendants_of.2.html">Slate</a> asserts that former Presidents George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush are direct descendants of Thomas "Beau" Walker, one of the most notorious slave traders in the 18th century.</p><p>It's long been known that the Bushes' ancestors owned slaves -- as did at least 25 other presidents' families -- but according to Slate reporter Simon Akam, "Walker, George H.W. Bush's great-great-great grandfather, was the captain of, master of, or investor in at least 11 slaving voyages to West Africa between 1784 and 1792."</p><p>"This is the first time an ancestor of Bush has been directly linked to the brutal trans-Atlantic trade in which millions perished," Akam writes.</p><p>Akam's conclusion comes from the discovery that two prominent Thomas Walkers -- one who settled in America and produced the Bush clan, and one who owned property in Sierra Leone and worked in the slave trade business -- are likely the same person.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/new_link_suggests_george_w_bush_direct_descendant_of_notorious_slave_trader/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/new_link_suggests_george_w_bush_direct_descendant_of_notorious_slave_trader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Ayers: Obama has committed war crimes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/bill_ayers_obama_has_committed_war_crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/bill_ayers_obama_has_committed_war_crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Ayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I think that these are war crimes," he said of Obama's drone policy. "I think that they’re acts of terror"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Ayers, the professor and former member of the Weather Underground whose relationship with President Obama became fodder for the right during the 2008 campaign, says that he's disappointed with Obama as a president, and thinks that the administration's drone policy "absolutely" constitutes a war crime.</p><p>“Every president in this century should be put on trial,” Ayers told <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/06/18/bill_ayers_obama_should_be_put_on_trial_for_war_crimes.html">Real Clear Politics</a>. “Every one of them goes into an office dripping with blood and then adds to it. And, yes, I think that these are war crimes. I think that they’re acts of terror.”</p><p>“I like him personally,” he added. “I mean, he’s a really good guy.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/bill_ayers_obama_has_committed_war_crimes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/bill_ayers_obama_has_committed_war_crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Cheney praises NSA surveillance program</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/dick_cheney_praises_nsa_surveillance_program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/dick_cheney_praises_nsa_surveillance_program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Vice President also called Edward Snowden a "traitor," and President Obama "not credible"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick Cheney was unfazed by revelations about the NSA's broad phone surveillance program, saying in an interview on Fox News Sunday that if the technology was available at the time, "we might well have been able to prevent 9/11."</p><p>"As everybody who's been associated with the program's said, if we had had this before 9/11, when there were two terrorists in San Diego, two hijackers, had been able to use that program, that capability, against that target, we might well have been able to prevent 9/11,"  Cheney said. He <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/16/18987472-cheney-says-nsa-monitoring-could-have-prevented-911?lite">continued</a> with a pointed criticism of President Obama. "I find a lot of it is, in other areas — the IRS, Benghazi — not credible. I'm obviously not a fan of the incumbent president."</p><p>Asked about Edward Snowden, who leaked information about the NSA program to the press, Cheney called him a "traitor."</p><p>"I think it's one of the worst occasions, in my memory, of somebody with access to classified information doing enormous damage to the national security interests of the United States," he said.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/dick_cheney_praises_nsa_surveillance_program/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/dick_cheney_praises_nsa_surveillance_program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRISM part of a much larger government surveillance program</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/prism_part_of_a_much_larger_government_surveillance_program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/prism_part_of_a_much_larger_government_surveillance_program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-98XN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies have been handling requests from the FBI for years, under a program called US-98XN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — In the months and early years after 9/11, FBI agents began showing up at Microsoft Corp. more frequently than before, armed with court orders demanding information on customers.</p><p>Around the world, government spies and eavesdroppers were tracking the email and Internet addresses used by suspected terrorists. Often, those trails led to the world's largest software company and, at the time, largest email provider.</p><p>The agents wanted email archives, account information, practically everything, and quickly. Engineers compiled the data, sometimes by hand, and delivered it to the government.</p><p>Often there was no easy way to tell if the information belonged to foreigners or Americans. So much data was changing hands that one former Microsoft employee recalls that the engineers were anxious about whether the company should cooperate.</p><p>Inside Microsoft, some called it "Hoovering" — not after the vacuum cleaner, but after J. Edgar Hoover, the first FBI director, who gathered dirt on countless Americans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/prism_part_of_a_much_larger_government_surveillance_program/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/prism_part_of_a_much_larger_government_surveillance_program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP plan: Bring Dubya back!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look beneath the surface, and a hot new plan for the party's comeback is really just George W. Bush redux]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s fast becoming a cliché, but it’s nevertheless the truth: If Republicans plan to win the White House any time soon, they’re going to have to change. And that change will have to be more substantial than simply asking the Romney clan to ease up a bit on the whole public service thing, or churning out more Spanish-language campaign ads during the next election. To borrow one of the president’s favorite phrases, when it comes to an altered Republican Party, there’s got to be a “there” there. Singing some new lyrics atop the same old tune just won’t cut it. (Sorry, Senator Rubio.)</p><p>So the question is not so much whether the GOP should change but, rather, <em>how</em>? Two options commonly proffered are as follows: Republicans could follow the lead of Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul and push for even smaller government (I call this the “more cowbell” school of thought). Or they could look instead to the small but influential group of right-wing intellectuals claiming to offer a new path: the “conservative reformers.” The decision looks so simple. Either one step forward, or two steps back.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly, white people care about privacy incursions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For many, government surveillance has been a regular part of life, especially since 9/11. So, why the outrage now?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a result of the recent <a href="http://truth-out.org/news/item/16882-a-massive-surveillance-state-glenn-greenwald-exposes-covert-nsa-program-collecting-calls-emails">revelations about National Security Agency surveillance</a>, a fierce debate about privacy and the powers of security services has been raging. But in light of the fact that such an approach has long been taken toward a segment of Americans, one might ask why it required this latest series of developments to spur discussion.</p><p>Mounting domestic and international pressure against the PRISM surveillance program has forced the Obama administration to concede that the revelations have sparked “<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/10/patriot-act-nsa-surveillance-review">an appropriate debate</a>.” Concern – and in some cases, outrage -- at these measures has been expressed by general members <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113443/nsa-surveillance-poll-prism-not-popular-phone-record-collection">of the public</a> and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-11/how-rand-paul-can-take-on-the-nsa.html">politicians</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/10/obama-pressured-explain-nsa-surveillance">many of whom made no secret of their anger or mistrust toward them</a>. Given the seriousness of the allegations, the outrage expressed at such a situation is obviously justified; the courage of the leaker and those taking the fight to government, commendable.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pic of the day: George H.W. Bush wearing Superman socks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/picture_of_the_day_george_h_w_bush_wearing_superman_socks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/picture_of_the_day_george_h_w_bush_wearing_superman_socks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pic of the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former President got festive for his 89th birthday celebration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To mark his 89th birthday, former President George H.W. Bush donned Superman socks while in Kennebunkport, Maine.</p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57588906/former-president-george-h-w-bush-feted-with-sock-pictures-for-89th-birthday/">CBS News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The library of Former President George H.W. Bush, who's celebrating his 89th birthday Wednesday, solicited <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/georgebushfoundation/sets/72157634068817473/">pictures </a>from well-wishers of their colorful socks to celebrate Bush's birthday.</p> <p>"Join us in wishing President Bush a Happy Birthday by wearing your most colorful or outlandish socks," reads a message on The George Bush Library Foundation's <a href="http://www.georgebushfoundation.org/socks">website</a>. "All are invited to submit a photo wearing crazy socks to share in the birthday festivities."</p></blockquote><p>"George has taken to wearing the weirdest socks," said his wife Barbara Bush.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/picture_of_the_day_george_h_w_bush_wearing_superman_socks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/picture_of_the_day_george_h_w_bush_wearing_superman_socks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you can&#8217;t sue the government for spying on you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/why_you_cant_sue_the_government_for_spying_on_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/why_you_cant_sue_the_government_for_spying_on_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appellate Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warrantless Wiretapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The courts have set up "one big Catch-22" that makes it impossible to take on the government]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, amid all the other news about the government's vast surveillance network, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California dismissed a case brought seven years ago against the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program. The dismissal essentially affirms the "big Catch-22" that makes it nearly impossible for American citizens to sue their government for spying on them.</p><p>Among other things, <a href="http://ccrjustice.org/">the Center for Constitutional Rights</a> coordinates the legal defense of the hundreds of detainees held at the Guantánamo Bay prison camp. After the New York Times revealed the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program in late 2005, CCR had reason to believe that the agency had intercepted its attorneys calls and emails with people outside the U.S., including clients, clients' families, outside attorneys, potential witnesses and others.</p><p>So in 2006 <a href="http://ccrjustice.org/CCR-v-Obama">they sued</a>, asking a federal court for an injunction to stop the program and naming George W. Bush, the head of the NSA and the heads of other intelligence agencies as defendants. The government eventually ended that program, so CCR now wanted the court to force the government to destroy any records of surveillance that the intelligence agencies may still have retained from its old illegal wiretapping program.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/why_you_cant_sue_the_government_for_spying_on_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/why_you_cant_sue_the_government_for_spying_on_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad about NSA&#8217;s overreach? Blame Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/blame_congress_for_the_nsas_overreach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/blame_congress_for_the_nsas_overreach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s plenty of fault to go around, from Bush to Obama to NSA itself. But the legislative branch truly failed us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don’t like the revelations this week about what the NSA has been up to regarding your phone and Internet data, whom should you blame?</p><p>The NSA? Sure. But the nature of intelligence agencies is to gather intelligence. Yes, they should know and observe limits, but realistically don’t expect any more from them than staying within the law, which appears to have been the case here.</p><p>The courts? Judges approved what’s been going on. Did they stretch the law in favor of the government? Perhaps. And, generally, the courts could have found the entire process unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court hasn’t been interested in aggressively expanding the Fourth Amendment any time recently. Feel free to assign them some blame, and watch the reporting to discover how much.</p><p>George W. Bush? PRISM began while he was in the White House, and his overall record on civil liberties was abysmal. Barack Obama? He, at least as far as we know, stayed within the law. But, yes, if you don’t approve of what NSA has been doing, both Bush and Obama deserve some of the blame. <span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">The private companies that cooperated? Yeah, them too. The law pushed them, but they seem to have had options.</span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/blame_congress_for_the_nsas_overreach/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/blame_congress_for_the_nsas_overreach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America the passive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/america_the_passive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/america_the_passive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NSA dragnet sparks insufficient outrage because most of us feel complicit in the erosion of our privacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Maddow spoke for a lot of progressives, as usual, when she admitted on her show Thursday night, about the rolling wave of revelations about NSA’s data-dragnet: "Part of me feels like screaming, part of me feels like we've known this was going on since 2006-2007."</p><p>It’s true, we’ve learned a lot about aspects of the vast post-9/11 surveillance state in the last 10 years, and it’s hard to keep track of who knew what when, and what mattered most about each revelation (including these latest). It’s true that George W. Bush took both the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and pushed them beyond the boundaries of legality – and then Congress acted, not to rebuke Bush or rein him in, but to make those abuses legal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/america_the_passive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/america_the_passive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>300</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party hates Jan Brewer now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["She is George Bush in a skirt!" a top Arizona Republican angrily declares. How it all went downhill so suddenly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Arizona this week, black is white, up is down, left is right and Gov. Jan Brewer is getting <a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=116437529869&amp;story_fbid=10151590798079870">praised by gay Democrats</a> and slammed by Tea Party conservatives.</p><p>The governor made a name for herself on Fox News and at national gatherings of conservatives like CPAC as a kind of uber-Tea Partyer, who <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Scorpions-Breakfast-Interests-Politicos-Americas/dp/0062106392">eats scorpions for breakfast</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/chilly-reception-obama-lands-in-phoenix-has-words-with-gop-governor/">wags her finger in the president's face</a> at lunchtime, signs <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/jan-brewer-jesus-got-me-here">strict anti-immigration bills into law</a> in the afternoon, and gives the Tea Party flag the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/04/19/159771/jan-brewer-tea-party-flag/">same legal protections</a> as the Star-Spangled Banner by bedtime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The government has all your info</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_nsa_has_all_your_info/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_nsa_has_all_your_info/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisa amendments act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case you weren't clear on this. Here's why nothing will be done about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CIA does the <em>sexy</em> evil stuff -- assassination attempts, regime change, torture, air strikes against crowds of people totally unknown to us -- but the scariest domestic intelligence agency for your average American, at little risk of dying in a drone strike or being deposed in by a military junta, has always been the National Security Agency. Last night, the Guardian's Glenn Greenwald, Ewen MacAskill and Spencer Ackerman reported <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order">that the NSA ordered Verizon to provide it with information on every call made in the United States for a three-month period ending in July.</a> Yes, every call.</p><p>The NSA got a FISA judge to order Verizon to turn over "all call detail records or 'telephony metadata' created by Verizon for communications between the United States and abroad" or "wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls." The records include "metadata," meaning the records show the phone numbers, call length and possibly location the calls were made, among lots of other helpful identifying information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_nsa_has_all_your_info/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_nsa_has_all_your_info/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>231</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld: &#8220;I can&#8217;t tell&#8221; if Obama has switched sides in &#8220;War on Terror&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/rumsfeld_i_cant_tell_if_obama_has_switched_sides_in_war_on_terror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/rumsfeld_i_cant_tell_if_obama_has_switched_sides_in_war_on_terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Horowitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It bothers me greatly that he's unwilling to identify the enemy," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld says that he "can't tell" if President Obama has switched sides in the "War on Terror," because the President is "unwilling to identify the enemy."</p><p>"As you go around the country, do you have any sense or the same sort of sinking feeling that the rest of us have that [Obama has] actually switched sides in the War on Terror?" Rumsfeld was asked at a recent event.</p><p>"You know, I just don't feel competent to answer," Rumsfeld said. "I can't tell." He continued: "It bothers me greatly that he's unwilling to identify the enemy. I don't see how you win if you don't."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/rumsfeld_i_cant_tell_if_obama_has_switched_sides_in_war_on_terror/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/rumsfeld_i_cant_tell_if_obama_has_switched_sides_in_war_on_terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s newest non-scandal?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/obamas_latest_scandal_is_no_scandal_at_all_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/obamas_latest_scandal_is_no_scandal_at_all_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The use of secret emails simply isn't the unprecedented abuse of power the AP might have you believe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/logo_300x501-e1364224707606.png" alt="International Business Times" align="left" /></a> The revelation that top political appointees in President Obama’s administration are using “secret” government email accounts has left influential Republicans salivating at the thought that the <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SECRET_EMAILS?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">exclusive Associated Press story</a> constitutes another White House scandal. But is this another big controversy, or not that big a deal?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/obamas_latest_scandal_is_no_scandal_at_all_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/obamas_latest_scandal_is_no_scandal_at_all_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George W. Bush: I do not &#8220;long for power&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/george_w_bush_i_do_not_long_for_power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/george_w_bush_i_do_not_long_for_power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former president admits that "fame can be very addictive"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weeks after the opening of a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/must_see_morning_clip_choose_your_own_adventure_at_the_bush_presidential_library/">gargantuan monument to his legacy</a> and George W. Bush's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/">very public attempt to revise history</a>, the former president insists that he doesn't want more fame and power, telling the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/30/george-w-bush-bike_n_3359824.html">the Huffington Post's</a> Jon Ward "I don't long for [fame]. Nor do I long for power."</p><p>"Fame can become very addictive. And I've had all the fame a man could want," he said.</p><p>"I've come to realize that power can be corrosive if you've had it for too long," Bush said. "It can dim your vision. And so I came to the conclusion that, you know, I don't long for fame. And really, gonna shy away from it. Not shy away from it. Avoid it. I'm not very shy. Avoid it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/george_w_bush_i_do_not_long_for_power/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/george_w_bush_i_do_not_long_for_power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz&#8217;s personality problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas senator is annoying, and doesn’t play well with others. Will that doom his White House ambitions?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Cruz has sharp elbows. He’s already managed to annoy several senators, including Republicans, and sparked what appears to be a full-on feud with Sen. John McCain. He also wants to be president of the United States.</p><p>Do those things go together? The political scientist John Sides <a href="http://themonkeycage.org/2013/05/22/why-ted-cruz-needs-to-trust-republicans/">thinks it’s going to be a problem</a>:</p><blockquote><p>[T]o be the Republican nominee, he’ll need the support of his Republican colleagues. The 2012 election once again showed—and despite some skepticism—that it is very hard to win the nomination unless you’re preferred by a substantial chunk, if not the vast majority of, your party’s leaders (as was Romney). Which is to say, it pays to be nice to your colleagues. It’s no guarantee, of course: junior Senator Hillary Clinton kept her head down and played nice, and lost the nomination. John McCain often irritated his fellow Republicans, but still mustered enough support within the party to win the nomination.</p></blockquote><p>But political scientist Dave Hopkins <a href="https://twitter.com/DaveAHopkins/status/337382079866220544">isn’t so sure</a>: “Don't think this is the problem for Cruz that John does. McCain bugged Sen colleagues/leaders too; still won '08 nom.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/ted_cruzs_personality_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to name ex-Bush aide to head FBI</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/obama_to_name_ex_bush_aide_to_head_fbi_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/obama_to_name_ex_bush_aide_to_head_fbi_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Comey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Comey was formerly the No. 2 at the Justice Department ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is prepared to nominate James Comey, a former Bush administration official with bipartisan credentials, as the next FBI director. In a possible warning sign, the top Republican on the Senate committee that would review the nomination said Comey would face questions about his ties to Wall Street.</p><p>Three people with knowledge of the selection said Wednesday that Obama planned to nominate Comey, who was the No. 2 at the Justice Department under President George W. Bush. Comey was general counsel to Connecticut-based hedge fund Bridgewater Associates from 2010 until earlier this year and now lectures at Columbia Law School.</p><p>Comey would replace Robert Mueller, who has held the job since shortly before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, which forced the FBI to transform itself into one of the nation's chief weapons in the war on terror. Mueller's last day on the job is Sept. 4.</p><p>The White House may hope that Comey's Republican background will help him through Senate confirmation at a time when some of Obama's nominations have been facing tough battles. But Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, indicated Comey's confirmation hearing would raise questions about the Obama administration's investigations of Wall Street.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/obama_to_name_ex_bush_aide_to_head_fbi_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/obama_to_name_ex_bush_aide_to_head_fbi_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>