<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > George W. Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/george_w_bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How a fight with Rick Santorum made an IRS commissioner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the little-told story of how Doug Shulman, who led the IRS when targeting occurred, unexpectedly got the job]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While President Obama fired IRS commissioner Steven Miller this week for failing to stop the enhanced scrutiny the IRS gave 501c4 applications with conservative missions, most of the activity happened under a man who was never supposed to get the job: Miller’s predecessor, Doug Shulman. Indeed, the little-known story of how Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 stems from an unfortunate incident that derailed his party’s first choice for the spot.</p><p>One thing to keep in mind is that the president and his staff have literally thousands of posts to fill. A White House that doesn’t want to get bogged down will defer many of these lower-level appointments to politicians in his party who have some special interest or expertise in a position. The IRS commissioner is usually seen as a low-level position, since the commissioner merely enforces the law and has no ability to actually make law.</p><p>When it came time to replace the retiring IRS commissioner in 2007, Senator Charles Grassley, ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, offered up one of his senior staffers on the committee by the name of Dean Zerbe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS commissioner&#8217;s firing won&#8217;t end investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/irs_commissioners_firing_wont_end_investigation_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/irs_commissioners_firing_wont_end_investigation_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Lew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Attorney General Eric Holder, the FBI is looking into potential civil rights violations at the agency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Don't look for the outcry over the Internal Revenue Service's improper targeting of tea party groups to subside with the ouster of the agency's acting commissioner.</p><p>Three congressional committees are investigating and the FBI is looking into potential civil rights violations at the IRS, Attorney General Eric Holder said.</p><p>Other potential crimes include making false statements to authorities and violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in some partisan political activities, Holder said.</p><p>President Barack Obama said Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew had asked for and accepted Steven T. Miller's resignation.</p><p>"Americans are right to be angry about it, and I am angry about it," Obama said Wednesday evening in a televised statement from the White House. "I will not tolerate this kind of behavior in any agency but especially in the IRS, given the power that it has and the reach that it has into all of our lives."</p><p>Miller's ouster came five days after an IRS supervisor publicly revealed that agents had improperly targeted groups with "tea party" or "patriots" in their applications for tax-exempt status. It came a day after an inspector general's report blamed ineffective management in Washington for allowing it to happen for more than 18 months.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/irs_commissioners_firing_wont_end_investigation_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/irs_commissioners_firing_wont_end_investigation_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the group the IRS actually denied: Democrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Tea Party applicants got unfair IRS scrutiny, only one known group had status revoked. They’re Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone agrees that the IRS shouldn’t have targeted groups with “Tea Party” or “Patriot” in their names for special scrutiny in awarding tax-exempt status. NBC News reports two agents have been disciplined for doing so, and the Justice Department announced a criminal probe. But so far no one has identified a single conservative group that was denied status in the controversial review, though some faced bureaucratic hurdles and had their tax-exempt status delayed.</p><p>In fact, the only known 501(c)(4) applicant to have its status denied happens to be a <em>progressive</em> group: the Maine chapter of Emerge America, which trains Democratic women to run for office. Although the group did no electoral work, and didn’t participate in independent expenditure campaign activity either, its partisan status apparently disqualified it from being categorized as working for the “common good.”</p><p>Ironically, the national organization and its earlier chapters had gotten tax-exempt status by the IRS during the Bush administration in 2006. But it appears as though the Maine group’s rejection triggered a review of the entire organization, and Emerge America and all of its chapters had their tax-exempt status revoked. Emerge reincorporated with 527 status, which requires it to report its donors. You can read the IRS letters explaining its decisions at the bottom of this post.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the IRS targeted liberals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/when_the_irs_targeted_liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/when_the_irs_targeted_liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under George W. Bush, it went after the NAACP, Greenpeace and even a liberal church ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While few are defending the Internal Revenue Service for targeting some 300 conservative groups, there are two critical pieces of context missing from the conventional wisdom on the "scandal." First, at least from what we know so far, the groups were not targeted in a political vendetta -- but rather were executing <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/how_irs_scandal_could_help_karl_rove_and_dark_money/">a makeshift enforcement test</a> (an ugly one, mind you) for IRS employees tasked with separating political groups not allowed to claim tax-exempt status, from bona fide social welfare organizations. Employees are given almost zero official guidance on how to do that, so they went after Tea Party groups because those seemed like they might be political. Keep in mind, the commissioner of the IRS at the time was a Bush appointee.</p><p>The second is that while this is the first time this kind of thing has become a national scandal, it's not the first time such activity has occurred.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/when_the_irs_targeted_liberals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/when_the_irs_targeted_liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop holding Democrats to a different standard</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/on_scandals_obama_held_to_higher_standard_than_bush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/on_scandals_obama_held_to_higher_standard_than_bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secret Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent IRS flap shows an obvious double standard in Washington's reactions to Bush era and Obama era misconduct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As your kindergarten teacher probably told you, two wrongs do not make a right. But the discrepancy in reactions to wrongs does, indeed, show how Washington so often serves the interests of the political right.</p><p>That's one of the big - if deliberately ignored - takeaways from the reaction to news that the Internal Revenue Service allegedly targeting conservative organizations for extra scrutiny in their larger review of political groups' tax exempt status. In the last few days, the allegations have generated a wave of national headlines, a <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/house-committee-to-probe-alleged-irs-targeting">congressional investigation</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_bill_would_criminalize_political_discrimination_at_the_irs/">federal legislation</a> and <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/12/george-will-floats-impeachment-after-irs-targets-tea-party-groups/">ever-louder</a> <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/why-the-irs-scandal-should-lead-to-obamas-impeachment/?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=story&amp;utm_campaign=Share%20Buttons">calls for impeachment</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/on_scandals_obama_held_to_higher_standard_than_bush/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/on_scandals_obama_held_to_higher_standard_than_bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Gates: I would have handled Benghazi the same way</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criticism of the military response shows a "cartoonish impression of military capabilities," Gates said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that when it comes to military response to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, he doesn't believe the would have acted any differently. "Frankly, had I been in the job at the time, I think my decisions would have been just as theirs were," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "We don't have a ready force standing by in the Middle East...and so getting somebody there in a timely way would have been very difficult, if not impossible."</p><p>Gates, who was appointed by George W. Bush and kept on during President Obama's first term, continued that he wouldn't have "approved sending an aircraft, a single aircraft, over Benghazi under those circumstances."</p><p>"It's sort of a cartoonish impression of military capabilities and military forces," Gates added. "The one thing that our forces are noted for is planning and preparation before we send people in harm's way, and there just wasn't time to do that."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Assange: The government is a vindictive loser</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/julian_assange_the_government_is_a_vindictive_loser_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/julian_assange_the_government_is_a_vindictive_loser_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truthdig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warrantless Wiretapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pentagon Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuadorean Embassy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland Yard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candice S. Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rajiv Gandhi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wikileaks founder reflects on his persecution in a rare interview from London's Ecuadorean embassy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>London</em>—A tiny tip of the vast subterranean network of governmental and intelligence agencies from around the world dedicated to destroying WikiLeaks and arresting its founder, Julian Assange, appears outside the red-brick building on Hans Crescent Street that houses the Ecuadorean Embassy. Assange, the world’s best-known political refugee, has been in the embassy since he was offered sanctuary there last June. British police in black Kevlar vests are perched night and day on the steps leading up to the building, and others wait in the lobby directly in front of the embassy door. An officer stands on the corner of a side street facing the iconic department store Harrods, half a block away on Brompton Road. Another officer peers out the window of a neighboring building a few feet from Assange’s bedroom at the back of the embassy. Police sit round-the-clock in a communications van topped with an array of antennas that presumably captures all electronic forms of communication from Assange’s ground-floor suite.</p><p>The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS), or Scotland Yard, said the estimated cost of surrounding the Ecuadorean Embassy from June 19, 2012, when Assange entered the building, until Jan. 31, 2013, is the equivalent of $4.5 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/julian_assange_the_government_is_a_vindictive_loser_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/julian_assange_the_government_is_a_vindictive_loser_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria: What&#8217;s really happening</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saddam Hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons of mass destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's what you need to know about the constantly evolving situation there, and the best of our no-good options]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1968, caught in the throes of the Vietnam War, a frustrated Lyndon Johnson quipped to Bill Moyers that he felt like a hitchhiker on a highway in a Texas hailstorm. “I can’t run, I can’t hide and I can’t make it stop.”</p><p>Syria isn’t Barack Obama’s Vietnam by a long shot. And I seriously doubt that Obama feels the same way Johnson did. But Johnson’s conundrum is in many ways Obama’s, too. In Syria, there are no good options, American credibility is at stake, and the pressures to act are considerable in the face of great uncertainties.</p><p>Doing nothing is unacceptable in the face of almost 80,000 dead and millions of Syrians displaced internally and abroad. Limited involvement – even on the military side -- will likely be ineffective, and getting stuck with the check through undertaking a massive military intervention is out of the question.</p><p>So what’s a guy to do? Sure, there are risks of acting; but there are consequences of not acting, too.</p><p>Indeed, in this regard, Syria is a moral tragedy and humanitarian disaster. It’s hemorrhaging refugees and radicalized jihadists. It’s a threat to regional stability and to Turkey, Jordan and Israel. It’s a potential proliferator of chemical weapons, a way to weaken Iran if only the Americans would recognize the opportunities; and it’s a threat to America’s credibility if Obama doesn’t act boldly in the face of self-declared “red lines.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_what_can_the_u_s_do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Obama withholding secret torture report from Americans?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_is_obama_withholding_secret_torture_report_from_americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_is_obama_withholding_secret_torture_report_from_americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Tenet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A massive report on torture reveals it's far less effective than reported. But the CIA refuses to declassify it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of what you’ve been told (or <a href="http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=0d4e72c7-361a-4271-922f-6e2ccaa3f609">seen in movies</a>) about George W. Bush’s supposedly effective torture program is false and overhyped. At least, that’s one of the conclusions of the 6,000-page review of the program the Senate Intelligence Committee completed last year.</p><p>Yet, right now, President Obama is preventing you from learning any of this, by keeping the report classified.</p><p>Before the end of the Bush administration, Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va. — then the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee — started investigating the torture program. When Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., took over as chairwoman of the committee in 2009, she intensified the investigation and negotiated with the CIA to get access to its files. After almost four more years of work and reviewing 6 million pages of documents, the committee voted out the report in December on a mostly party line vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_is_obama_withholding_secret_torture_report_from_americans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/why_is_obama_withholding_secret_torture_report_from_americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantánamo: It&#8217;s Obama&#8217;s disgrace now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guantanamo hunger strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, Bush created this nightmare -- but the current hunger-strike crisis stems from Obama's political cowardice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, in the long-ago days of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, we may have had the worst and most abusive presidential administration in the history of the United States, but at least there was some moral clarity. You were on their side or you weren’t; you either bought into the idea that the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war_on_terror">“war on terror”</a> was a special set of circumstances that required an immense expansion of executive power and the indefinite suspension of constitutional norms, or you didn’t. Nothing quite symbolized that division like the military detention camp at <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/guantanamo_bay">Guantánamo Bay,</a> Cuba. It was a locked-down and secretive facility in a country that didn’t want us there, where hooded and manacled men – in theory, the most violent and dangerous anti-American militants on the planet – were kept under mysterious conditions, denied the rights we routinely accord to suspected murderers and rapists, and subjected to interrogations we didn’t want to know about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Ted Cruz the future of Texas?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/is_ted_cruz_the_future_of_texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/is_ted_cruz_the_future_of_texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party favorite embodies the debate that will determine the Lone Star State's political direction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a summer night in Houston in 1993, Jenny Ertman and Elizabeth Pena, aged 14 and 16, respectively, left a pool party. They were worried about getting home late, so they decided to take a shortcut.</p><p>Cutting through a park, they came across six men drinking beer. The men had recently finished a gang initiation ceremony and decided to celebrate by having “fun,” as one of them would later put it. But after raping and beating the girls for about an hour, the men started to worry that the girls might recognize them. So they strangled the girls to death. They used a belt. Then the belt broke, so they used shoelaces. Then they started stomping on the girls’ necks, to make sure.</p><p>All of the men were arrested several days later. The three who were older than 18 at the time would eventually be executed. But one of them, Jose Medellin, challenged the sentence all the way to the Supreme Court. The issue was that he was a Mexican national, having only moved to the United States when he was three, and none of the Houston police had bothered to notify the Mexican Consulate when he was arrested.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/is_ted_cruz_the_future_of_texas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/is_ted_cruz_the_future_of_texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeffrey Goldberg&#8217;s Qatari myopia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab league]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haim Saban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel-Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The columnist's attacks on Qatar reek of deep hypocrisy and reflect a Bush era worldview ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s something to be said for self-awareness, and where its absence can lead an individual. Thursday’s Bloomberg View featured an <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-02/qatar-attention-starved-teen-of-the-middle-east.html">attack by columnist Jeffrey Goldberg</a> against the Persian Gulf state of Qatar, which he described as “The Attention Starved Teen of the Middle East.” Nothing should insulate Qatar or any government from harsh criticism, but Goldberg’s argument is notable for deep myopia, hysteria and essential hypocrisy.</p><p>Goldberg’s piece takes aim at, among other things, the alleged dishonesty of Qatari foreign policy. Citing Qatar’s dual policy of good relations with Israel and funding of the Hamas-led administration of the Gaza Strip, Goldberg excoriates Haim Saban – an Israeli-American and another major funder of Brookings (along with the Qatari government itself) – for his public embrace of Qatari Prime Minister Hamid bin Jasim Al-Thani. Denouncing Qatar as “seeing nothing incongruous about maintaining open contacts with Israelis while funding an organization whose declared goal is killing Israelis,” Goldberg fails to grasp the distinction between preventing the economic collapse of the Gaza Strip and of funding terrorist attacks against Israel. Qatar explicitly falls into the former category. Saban, the <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3501880,00.html">Israeli government</a> and the <a href="http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4374140,00.html">Israeli private sector</a> are willing to talk to Qatar regardless of its relationship to Hamas, so why isn’t Goldberg?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/jeffrey_goldbergs_qatari_myopia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would we give up burgers to stop climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report suggests that adjusting our diet can slow global warming. Now let's see if our politics will let us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed the news, humanity spent the Earth Day week reaching another sad milestone in the history of catastrophic climate change: For the first time, measurements of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere surpassed 400 parts per million, aka way above what our current ecosystem can handle.</p><p>Actually, you probably did miss the news because most major media outlets didn't cover it in a serious way, if at all. Instead, they and their audiences evidently view such information as far less news-, buzz- and tweet-worthy than (among other things) the opening of George W. Bush's library and President Obama's jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner.</p><p>Such an appetite for distraction, no doubt, comes from both those who deny the problem of climate change and those who acknowledge the crisis but nonetheless look away from what feels like an unsolvable mess.</p><p>That sense of hopelessness is understandable. After all, some of the most hyped ways to reduce carbon emissions -- electric cars, mass-scale renewable energy power plants, etc. -- require the kind of technological transformations that can seem impossibly unrealistic at a time when Congress can't even pass a budget.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Connor: Maybe SCOTUS shouldn&#8217;t have ruled on Bush v. Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandra day o'connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case "gave the court a less-than-perfect reputation," she said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said last week that in retrospect, perhaps the Supreme Court should not have elected to rule on Bush v. Gore, the 2000 decision that ended the Florida recount in the presidential race.</p><p>"It took the case and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue," she told the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-sandra-day-oconnor-edit-board-20130427,0,1201477.story">Chicago Tribune</a> editorial board in an interview on Friday. "Maybe the court should have said, 'We're not going to take it, goodbye.'"</p><p>From the Tribune:</p><blockquote><p>The case, she said, "stirred up the public" and "gave the court a less-than-perfect reputation."</p> <p>"Obviously the court did reach a decision and thought it had to reach a decision," she said. "It turned out the election authorities in Florida hadn't done a real good job there and kind of messed it up. And probably the Supreme Court added to the problem at the end of the day."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to debunk George W. Bush&#8217;s attempts at revisionism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush revisionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your definitive guide to the Bush cronies' talking points, and why all of them are insane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every dog goes to heaven and every former president should get a shot at repairing his legacy, especially when it's as tattered as George W. Bush's. With the opening of his presidential library and museum this week, observers from former Bush officials to mainstream outlets were taking a fresh, rosy look at the Bush legacy. Some offered dopey and facially ridiculous cheerleading, while others offered more compelling suggestions to return to the Bush era with an open mind. After all, other presidents left office in a cloud only to be redeemed by history years later.</p><p>So, is this week making you feel a bit nostalgic for the Bush era? Don't. It's been almost half a decade since the 43rd president left office, and he's looking as bad as ever. Of course, that won't stop a small circle of admirers (many of whom used to be on his payroll) from trying, so here's your guide to taking on the five biggest specious pro-Bush talking points put forward this week:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>248</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The week in 10 pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Bangladesh to the banks of the Mississippi, a look at the images that defined the week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From Bangladesh to the banks of the Mississippi, a look at the images that defined the week]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Inside the Bush library and museum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George W. Bush takes a break from painting to attend his Museum's dedication ceremony]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart takes a look at the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum, "the Hard Rock Cafe of catastrophic policy decisions":</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:425825" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-25-2013/library-accomplished">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/must_see_morning_clip_inside_the_bush_library_and_museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Bush speech highlights their similarities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honoring his predecessor today, Obama reminds us that on foreign policy, he's accepted much of the Bush doctrine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dedication for George W. Bush’s presidential library included the presence of one current and four former United States presidents: George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and George W. Bush himself. A number of world leaders, such as Tony Blair, Silvio Berlusconi and Ehud Olmert, were in attendance as well.</p><p>When he ran against Republican Sen. John McCain, Obama campaigned in 2008 against what he called “<a href="http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/campaign2008/obama/10.27.08.html">eight years of failed policies</a>” from George W. Bush. But, today, Obama spoke reverently about becoming a part of “the world’s most exclusive club,” a group of “living former presidents” and one that included Bush.</p><blockquote> <div> <p>We do have a pretty nice clubhouse. But the truth is, our club is more like a support group. The last time we all got together was just before I took office. And I needed that. Because as each of these leaders will tell you, <strong>no matter how much you may think you’re ready to assume the office of the presidency, it’s impossible to truly understand the nature of the job until it’s yours, until you’re sitting at that desk.</strong></p> <p>And <strong>that’s why every President gains a greater appreciation for all those who served before him</strong>; for the leaders from both parties who have taken on the momentous challenges and felt the enormous weight of a nation on their shoulders. And for me, that appreciation very much extends to President Bush. [emphasis added]</p> </div> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/obama_embraces_the_worlds_most_exclusive_club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Bush is right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Known for her candor, the former first lady says Jeb shouldn’t run -- because “we’ve had enough Bushes.” Correct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We heard it repeatedly during the 2012 campaign and its sad aftermath for the GOP: The party’s silver lining was its <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-leadership/post/the-republican-partys-deep-bench-of-rising-stars/2012/09/04/37bae364-f696-11e1-8b93-c4f4ab1c8d13_blog.html">“deep bench”</a> of <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/top-10-republican-presidential-contenders-for-2016-20121106">2016 contenders</a>. Paul Ryan and Chris Christie, Marco Rubio and Rand Paul, Bobby Jindal and Scott Walker -- they were younger than Mitt Romney; they brought racial and ethnic diversity; Christie would bring a little ideological diversity, too, coming from the almost extinct wing of Northeastern Republicans. 2016 promised to be a bracing, exciting battle for the new soul of the party.</p><p>So I’ve found it a sad commentary on GOP rebuilding that there’s been so much talk this week about the likelihood and desirability of a Jeb Bush candidacy. And apparently one influential Republican, his mother, Barbara, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/jeb-bush-2016-barbara-bush-90623.html#ixzz2RUyDQi1A">agrees with me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_is_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Bush: I won&#8217;t weigh in on gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I’ve made the decision to get off the stage,” he told CBS News ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, George W. Bush won't be joining the ranks of Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter by throwing his support behind marriage equality now that he is safely out of the White House. He is, as ever, his same-old, constitutional-amendment-against-same-sex-marriage-supporting self -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/the_four_most_interesting_revelations_from_the_hacked_bush_emails/" target="_blank">nude self-portraits</a> and image rehab efforts be damned.</p><p>In an interview with Charlie Rose on CBS News, Bush said that he wouldn't comment on same-sex marriage (after happily commenting on national security and immigration reform, it is worth noting): “Yeah, well, I’m not, I’m not weighing in on these issues, as you know, because I’ve made the decision to get off the stage. And so I’m off the stage,” he told Rose.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/george_bush_i_wont_weigh_in_on_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
