<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > George W. Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/george_w_bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guess who&#8217;s coming to dinner?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/guess_whos_coming_to_dinner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/guess_whos_coming_to_dinner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oy vey!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12928541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George and Laura Bush dine with the Obamas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[George and Laura Bush dine with the Obamas]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/guess_whos_coming_to_dinner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Bush&#8217;s playbook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/using_bushs_playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/using_bushs_playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Karl Rove politics" aren't quite dead: Obama's strategy in 2012 will mirror W's in 2004]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama’s presidency was born from nothing so much as his repudiation of George W. Bush’s administration — its policies and politics, its style and tone. One of Obama’s most effective 2008 stump speech refrains was his promise to end the era of “Scooter Libby justice, ‘Brownie’ incompetence and Karl Rove politics.”</p><p>But the political dynamics for winning a second presidential term often differ markedly from winning the first. So don’t be surprised by many eerie parallels between Obama’s 2012 reelection bid and Bush’s 2004 campaign. The president may not rely upon “Karl Rove politics” in the strictest sense, and nobody would confuse David Axelrod with Rove. But Obama’s reelection route and rhetoric may bear more than a few Rovian hallmarks.</p><p>Now that Mitt Romney has won the Republican nomination, two key features prevail over the 2012 campaign — and both were also plainly evident in 2004. First, the incumbent president’s reelection fortunes are far from certain; and, second, the incumbent faces a decent but nevertheless weak challenger who is further hampered by internal problems within his party’s coalition.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/using_bushs_playbook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/11/using_bushs_playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bushies are back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/the_bushies_are_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/the_bushies_are_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missed the neocons? Don't worry: Mitt Romney's getting the band together again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was good reason for Republicans to cry foul over the Obama campaign’s advertisement highlighting the president’s killing of Osama bin Laden; the GOP has lost its decades-long edge on national security. According to a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-finds-broad-support-for-obamas-counterterrorism-policies/2012/02/07/gIQAFrSEyQ_story.html" target="_blank">Washington Post poll</a>, “By a margin of more than 2 to 1, Americans say the president’s handling of terrorism is a major reason to support rather than oppose his bid for reelection.”</p><p>Republicans lost their popularity on security issues for one reason: George W. Bush’s foreign policy was a disaster. And yet, the party’s nominee, Mitt Romney, has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mitt-romney-taps-foreign-policy-national-security-advisers/2011/10/06/gIQAnDHzPL_story.html">assembled</a> a foreign-policy team composed almost exclusively of individuals with the same war-always mentality and ideology that served Bush — and the United States — so poorly. In some cases, the exact same men responsible for Bush’s catastrophic national security policies are advising Romney. The former Massachusetts governor could have included some of the pragmatists and realists from the George H.W. Bush administration. Instead, a Romney presidency seems like it would be Bush 43 all over again.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/the_bushies_are_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/the_bushies_are_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush aide blasts torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/bush_aide_blasts_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/bush_aide_blasts_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12846431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Zelikow tried to warn Bush on interrogations. Now he's penned an authoritative article on how he was ignored]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush administration hasn’t heard the last from Philip Zelikow. After the rediscovery last week of his long lost <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/the_memo_bush_tried_to_destroy/">2006 anti-torture memo</a>, Zelikow, a former State Department official, has written arguably the most damning article yet about U.S. government’s interrogation policies from 2001 to 2009. The article, called “Codes of Conduct for a Twilight War,” will be released in a forthcoming issue of the Houston Law Journal, and was obtained exclusively by Salon. Says Zelikow in an email: “I'm not aware of other accounts that combine historical, policy and legal approaches to” the subject of the Bush administration’s interrogation methods.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/bush_aide_blasts_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/bush_aide_blasts_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Kinkade, the George W. Bush of art</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/thomas_kinkade_the_george_w_bush_of_art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/thomas_kinkade_the_george_w_bush_of_art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I .P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Kinkade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12827281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rise and fall of Thomas Kinkade, the Painter of Light&#8482; in a decade of bad faith]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News of Thomas Kinkade's death arrived on the same day I received in the mail a vintage teacup on which I had spent a ridiculous amount of money. It has a cottage painted on it. Kinkade, whose work has long exerted a morbid fascination for me (to the concern of all my friends), specialized in cottages. So some part of me understands the appeal, I guess, but, damn: Those paintings make my corneas hurt. And yet, I could barely stop looking at them.</p><p>Kinkade was only 54, and his family told the media that he died of "natural causes." This comes after years of reports of drunken public misbehavior: cursing at people who tried to save him from falling off bar stools, heckling Siegfried &amp; Roy, grabbing a woman's breasts at a publicity event and, most memorably, urinating on a Winnie the Pooh statue at the Disneyland Hotel while proclaiming, "This one's for you, Walt!" There were DUI arrests. Also, his manufacturing company declared bankruptcy two years ago, and former franchisees of the once-ubiquitous Thomas Kinkade Signature Galleries won settlements against him for fraud.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/thomas_kinkade_the_george_w_bush_of_art/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/thomas_kinkade_the_george_w_bush_of_art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The memo Bush tried to destroy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/the_memo_bush_tried_to_destroy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/the_memo_bush_tried_to_destroy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12793771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A document advising the Bush administration against torture has resurfaced, despite his best efforts to hide it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In February of 2006, Philip Zelikow, counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, authored a memo opposing the Bush administration’s torture practices (though he employed the infamous obfuscation of “enhanced interrogation techniques”). The White House tried to collect and destroy all copies of the memo, but one survived in the State Department’s bowels and was declassified <a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20120403/">yesterday</a> in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by the <a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/">National Security Archive</a>.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20120403/docs/Zelikow%20Feb%2015%202006.pdf">memo</a> argues that the Convention Against Torture, and the Constitution’s prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment, do indeed apply to the CIA’s use of “waterboard[ing], walling, dousing, stress positions, and cramped confinement.” Zelikow further wrote in the memo that “we are unaware of any precedent in World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, or any subsequent conflict for authorized, systematic interrogation practices similar to those in question here, even when the prisoners were presumed to be unlawful combatants.” According to the memo, the techniques are legally prohibited, even if there is a compelling state interest to justify them, since they should be considered cruel and unusual punishment and “shock the conscience.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/the_memo_bush_tried_to_destroy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/the_memo_bush_tried_to_destroy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George W. Bush mercifully silent on 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/george_w_bush_mercifully_silent_on_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/george_w_bush_mercifully_silent_on_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12783751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As operatives work to sugarcoat his legacy, the former president keeps quiet on the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico today <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=FA29BED8-8698-41BE-87B0-83712A04C8C5">asks the question America has not thought to ask</a>: Where is George W. Bush? (He is in Texas getting ready to watch some college hoops, most likely.) (Or he is out making $150,000 for one speech to some organization with too much money to burn.)</p><p>The former president hasn't really said or done much in terms of "politics" since he left office the day before Barack Obama made all the jobs disappear and gas prices rise. He hasn't weighed in at all on the election that is going on right now, even as his former president father and former governor brother have done the responsible Republican thing and endorsed Mitt Romney. (George H.W. Bush even went to the trouble of endorsing him twice, because no one noticed the first time.)</p><p>Why is that? Well, for one thing, Bush knows that his endorsement wouldn't really help anyone, because no one likes George W. Bush. But he also seems to have the idea that a former president should elevate himself above partisan squabbling and spend his days making a fortune on the speaking circuit and raising money for his library instead of still being active in electoral politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/george_w_bush_mercifully_silent_on_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/george_w_bush_mercifully_silent_on_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W. is frequent, irritating presence at mall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/bush_mall_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/bush_mall_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10417711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sources report that the 43rd president often challenges strangers to games of Pac-Man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every weekday at noon inside a North Dallas shopping mall, the 43rd president of the United States sits down at his usual table in the food court with two plates of magic fries, a jumbo Mello Yellow and a grande chimichanga with extra queso.  “When he first started showin’ up at the mall, people would always come over and ask for his autograph or whatever,” said Daryl Vanderveen, a 19-year-old cashier at Sbarro Pizza. “But now that he’s here so much nobody even looks up from their lunch.”</p><p>Sources interviewed for this article said that Mr. Bush spends at least eight hours of each day at the Preston Hollow Shopping Center, a popular retail destination near his home in suburban Dallas. “Other than that chimichanga lunch he doesn’t really have a set routine,” said one source. “Sometimes he’ll hang around Lenscrafters trying on glasses or head over to Abercrombie &amp; Fitch and watch the girls fold pants. Last week I saw him inside Pottery Barn sleeping in a leather recliner.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/bush_mall_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/bush_mall_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why body bags prompt support for war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/bodybags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/bodybags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2011/09/19/bodybags</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research confirms the pathology of staying the course]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <em>"One of the things that's very important ... is to never allow our youngsters to die in vain. And I've made the pledge to their parents. Withdrawing from the battlefield of Iraq would be just that. And it's not going to happen under my watch." -- George W. Bush, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=131608&amp;page=9">April 14, 2004</a></em>
  </p><p>In this memorable quote -- which was one of <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2125910/">many</a> similar statements --George W. Bush gave us probably history's most explicit example of how the <a href="%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%9Dhttp://youarenotsosmart.com/2011/03/25/the-sunk-cost-fallacy/%C3%A2%C2%80%C2%9D">"sunk cost"</a> argument suffuses today's national security politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/bodybags/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/19/bodybags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What we should have done after 9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/9_11_imperialism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/9_11_imperialism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/06/9_11_imperialism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the decade since the attacks, the U.S. consistently played into bin Laden's hands. Was there another way?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are approaching the 10th anniversary of the horrendous atrocities of September 11, 2001, which, it is commonly held, changed the world. On May 1st, the presumed mastermind of the crime, Osama bin Laden, was assassinated in Pakistan by a team of elite US commandos, Navy SEALs, after he was captured, unarmed and undefended, in Operation Geronimo.</p><p>A number of analysts have observed that although bin Laden was finally killed, he won some major successes in his war against the U.S. "He repeatedly asserted that the only way to drive the U.S. from the Muslim world and defeat its satraps was by drawing Americans into a series of small but expensive wars that would ultimately bankrupt them," Eric Margolis writes. "'Bleeding the U.S.,' in his words." The United States, first under George W. Bush and then Barack Obama, rushed right into bin Laden's trap... Grotesquely overblown military outlays and debt addiction... may be the most pernicious legacy of the man who thought he could defeat the United States" -- particularly when the debt is being cynically exploited by the far right, with the collusion of the Democrat establishment, to undermine what remains of social programs, public education, unions, and, in general, remaining barriers to corporate tyranny.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/9_11_imperialism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/9_11_imperialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>269</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The return of Neil Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/28/neil_bush_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/28/neil_bush_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/28/neil_bush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even in the Great Recession, the dim bulb of a dynasty manages to cash in on the family name]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the global economy has tanked in recent years, international companies have sought every advantage they can muster in seeking to score business deals abroad. One tactic, especially favored by big energy firms, is to retain the services of a middleman or "fixer." These obscure but vital players use clout, brains and wiles to broker deals between industry and third-world leaders, and to generally grease the gears of the global oil and gas trade.</p><p>Which on the surface makes it hard to understand why U.S. and foreign firms continue to seek the services of Neil Bush. The son of one president and brother of another, Neil's political clout has declined since Barack Obama replaced George W. Bush in 2009, and neither brains nor wiles is Neil's strong suit. Two decades ago, the Washington Post observed that his business ventures had "a history of crashing and burning in spectacular fashion," and time, alas, seems not to have improved his record.</p><p>Neil claims to have 30 years in the <a href="http://txoilltd.com/AboutTXOil/OfficersDirectors/NeilBush.aspx">energy industry</a>, though at least 10 people from the Texas oil patch I spoke with said they had never heard of him playing any notable role in the energy business. Of the former first sibling, one international oil executive and consultant said, "I can't imagine anything he could bring to the table."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/28/neil_bush_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/28/neil_bush_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Cheney&#8217;s secret resignation letter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/cheney_resignation_letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/cheney_resignation_letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/25/cheney_resignation_letter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We got our hands on it, or a reasonable facsimile]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Vice President Dick Cheney <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/61990.html">reveals in his new memoir that in March of 2001,</a> he wrote a secret letter of resignation, to be used in the event that he was unable to fulfill his duties. He wrote the letter, he tells NBC, because "there is no mechanism for getting rid of a vice president who can&#8217;t function," and Cheney had a history of heart attacks. He locked the letter in a safe, and told only the president and one trusted aide about its existence. No one has ever seen the letter -- until now.</p><p>Salon.com's War Room Secret Vice Presidential Correspondence Recovery Team tracked down the letter by following an elaborate series of clues Cheney placed around Washington, D.C. We reveal the contents of Cheney's secret letter of resignation below:</p><p>The Office of the Vice President<br />
March 15, 2001</p><p>Dear Mr. President:</p><p>If you're reading this, it means one of the following things has happened:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/cheney_resignation_letter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/cheney_resignation_letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief history of controversial presidential vacations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama's not the first one to be criticized for taking some time off from running the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/11/obama-vacation-pundits-say-no-way.html">is catching a lot of flak for planning a summer vacation.</a> The president will spend 11 days in Martha's Vineyard, and critics say that's a bad idea when markets are skittish and millions of Americans are out of work or struggling to get by. Of course, Republicans criticizing Obama are just mirroring what Democrats said about President George W. Bush, who, at this point in his presidency, had taken <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/obama-61-bush-180-clinton-26-the-never-ending-presidential-vacation-debate/2011/08/18/gIQARrBoNJ_blog.html">180 "days off"</a> to <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/markknoller/status/104162519144341504">Obama's 61.</a></p><p>Partisan wrangling over presidential vacation time is as old as the Republic itself. The Salon.com War Room Historical Fun Fact Team did some research, and found out what sort of grief past presidents got when they wanted to recharge their batteries:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the Bush-Obama administration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/obama_bush_presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/obama_bush_presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/obama_bush_presidency</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the advisers the president has sought and sacked reveals the deep similarities between the two leaders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too soon to speak of the Bush-Obama presidency?</p><p>The record shows impressive continuities between the two administrations, and nowhere more than in the policy of "force projection" in the Arab world. With one war half-ended in Iraq, but another doubled in size and stretching across borders in Afghanistan; with an expanded program of drone killings and black-ops assassinations, the latter glorified in <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/obama_hero_seal_the_deal_DuqxG3k4YHFs0NCBrlgEDO">special ceremonies of thanksgiving</a> (as they never were under Bush); with the number of prisoners at Guantanamo having decreased, but some now slated for permanent detention; with the repeated invocation of "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/10/us/10torture.html">state secrets</a>" to protect the government from charges of war crimes; with the Patriot Act renewed and its most dubious provisions left intact -- the Bush-Obama presidency has sufficient self-coherence to be considered a historical entity with a life of its own.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/obama_bush_presidency/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/obama_bush_presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bully the GOP has been waiting for</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/lyons_rick_perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/lyons_rick_perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/17/lyons_rick_perry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cowboy archetype runs so deep in American culture that even George W. Bush couldn't ruin it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that he&#8217;s declared his candidacy, odds are Republicans will nominate Texas Gov. Rick Perry for president. They won&#8217;t be able to help themselves. If Hollywood put out a casting call for an anti-Obama, Perry would get the role.</p><p>Democrats have been chortling about running against yet another swaggering Texas governor. Mother Jones blogger Kevin Drum explains why Perry can&#8217;t win:</p><blockquote>
<p>"He's too Texan...Even in the Republican Party, not everyone is from the South and not everyone is bowled over by a Texas drawl. Perry is, by a fair amount, more Texan than George W. Bush, and an awful lot of people are still suffering from Bush fatigue."</p>
</blockquote><p>I think this is wrong. The cowboy archetype runs so deep in American culture that even George W. Bush couldn&#8217;t ruin it. Besides, the Connecticut rancher was a trust fund poser who rode bicycles, not horses. Deep down, everybody knew that. Now that he&#8217;s no longer president, Republicans no longer have to pretend they believe the brush-cutting charade.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/lyons_rick_perry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/lyons_rick_perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If it walks like a W and talks like a W &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/05/perry_bush_speaking_style/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/05/perry_bush_speaking_style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/05/perry_bush_speaking_style</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Rick Perry sound too much like George W. Bush to be elected president?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Gov. Rick Perry looks increasingly likely to jump into the presidential race, and he has already been <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/20/rick_perry_bush">at</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/07/05/rick_perry_bush">pains</a> to distance himself from the man he served in the late 1990s as lieutenant governor: George W. Bush.</p><p>But there's one potential problem here. To many people, Perry's Texas twang sounds eerily like Bush's. Indeed, Perry's hometown of Paint Creek is <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&amp;source=s_d&amp;saddr=paint+creek,+tx&amp;daddr=Midland,+TX&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=FVyA-AEdkyEP-iklqKSSfUdUhjEn27cCrfrraA%3BFaI96AEdJWrq-SkP0aWROWH5hjH5GwZ_4e0VRw&amp;gl=us&amp;mra=ls&amp;sll=31.997346,-102.077915&amp;sspn=0.365115,0.453873&amp;g=Midland,+TX&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=32.509762,-100.854492&amp;spn=11.604991,14.523926&amp;z=6">not so far</a> from Bush's childhood home of Midland. But, unlike Bush, who left the state for Andover and Yale and Harvard, Perry never left Texas.</p><p>Here's a taste of Perry's speaking style:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/05/perry_bush_speaking_style/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/05/perry_bush_speaking_style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The true cost of George W. Bush&#8217;s magical thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/gene_lyons_bush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/gene_lyons_bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/03/gene_lyons_bush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street meltdown happened at the perfect moment for Republicans to blame the fallout on Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mystery has always been why any Democrat would have wanted to follow the catastrophic presidency of George W. Bush. To understand why, it's necessary to revisit ancient history, specifically 2001. Given today's TV- and Internet-shortened time horizon, that's almost like invoking the Napoleonic Wars, but bear with me.</p><p>Thanks partly to his skill at "triangulation" -- seeking middle ground between left and right -- President Clinton left a legacy of prosperity and balanced budgets. Republicans impeached him anyway.</p><p>Yeah, yeah, I know. Clinton's spectacular folly gave GOP hard-liners the excuse they'd spent his entire presidency looking for. That's not the point. To the Limbaugh-led, Confederate-accented Republican right, all Democrats are illegitimate. President Barack Obama often acts as if he doesn't understand that.</p><p>Anyway, let's stick to what's relevant today: taxes, spending and the U.S. economy. According to Congressional Budget Office projections, had the nation maintained the fiscal course the Clinton administration laid out, the national debt everybody rants about would have been retired by 2009.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/gene_lyons_bush/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/04/gene_lyons_bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Bush owns this deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/george_bush_owns_the_deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/george_bush_owns_the_deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/25/george_bush_owns_the_deficit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Useless news alert: Tax cuts and war contribute more to our burgeoning debt than Obama's new policies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about your <a href="http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/07/whats-behind-deficit-kabuki">left-wing</a> <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/07/the-chart-that-should-accompany-all-discussions-of-the-debt-ceiling/242484/">blogger</a> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/obamas-and-bushs-effect-on-the-deficit-in-one-graph/2011/07/25/gIQAELOrYI_blog.html?wprss=ezra-klein">link bait!</a> On Sunday, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/24/opinion/sunday/24sun4.html">published a chart</a> demonstrating the relative contributions to the deficit made by George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Short version: The total cost of new policies initiated during the administration of George Bush: $5.07 trillion. Barack Obama: $1.44 trillion.&#160;</p><div class="slide c">
<p>
      <img class='wp-image-10057147' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/07/chart.jpg' />
    </p>
<p class="credit">The New York Times/Congressional Budget Office/Center on Budget and Policy Priorities</p>
</p></div><p>Bush's tax cuts and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are the obvious big-ticket items. The tax cuts, in particular, are the structural-deficit-gift that keeps on giving. As the New York Times observes, if all of the Bush tax cuts "expired as scheduled at the end of 2012, future deficits would be cut by about half, to sustainable levels."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/george_bush_owns_the_deficit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/george_bush_owns_the_deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters blame Bush more than Obama for the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/quinnipiac_poll_votes_don_t_blame_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/quinnipiac_poll_votes_don_t_blame_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/14/quinnipiac_poll_votes_don_t_blame_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll reveals that voters would undo Bush policy and support tax hikes for the wealthy and corporations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday suggests that voters blame former President George W. Bush for the state of the American economy more than President Obama.</p><p>71 percent of respondents said they believe the country is in a recession, which is factually incorrect: The U.S. recession, which began in December 2007, technically ended in June 2009, not that it feels that way to most people. And to be sure, the economy would bottom out again in the unlikely event that the U.S. actually default on its debt.</p><p>Among those who do believe we're in a recession, 54 percent said it's primarily Bush's fault, compared to only 27 percent who blamed Obama.</p><p>Quinnipiac also found that 67 &#8211; 25 percent of respondents think that an agreement to raise the debt ceiling should include tax hikes for the wealthy and corporations, not just spending cuts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/quinnipiac_poll_votes_don_t_blame_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/quinnipiac_poll_votes_don_t_blame_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re stuck in Bush&#8217;s America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/bush_obama_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/bush_obama_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/12/bush_obama_policy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[W. and Cheney have faded from public view, but Obama continues to carry out their destructive war on terror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George W. who? I mean, the guy is so over. He turned the big <a href="http://www.kwtx.com/centraltexasvotes/localheadlines/Former_President_George_W_Bush_Turns_65_125093479.html">6-5</a> the other day and it was barely a footnote in the news. And Dick Cheney, tick-tick-tick. Condoleezza Rice? She's already on to her next <a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/208336/whats-in-condoleezza-rices-memoir">memoir</a>, and yet it's as if she's been wiped from history, too. As for Donald Rumsfeld, he published his <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amnesty-international/known-and-forgotten_b_832364.html">memoir</a> in February and it hit the bestseller lists, but a few months later, where is he?</p><p>And can anyone be surprised? They were wrong about Afghanistan. They were wrong about Iraq. They were wrong about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. They were wrong about what the U.S. military was capable of doing. The country imploded economically while they were at the helm. Geopolitically speaking, they headed the car of state for <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175351/tom_engelhardt_pox_americana">the nearest cliff</a>. In fact, when it comes to pure wrongness, what weren't they wrong about?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/bush_obama_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/bush_obama_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

