<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Glenn Greenwald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/glenn_greenwald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the &#8220;Journalists Against Journalism&#8221; club!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/meet_the_journalists_against_journalism_club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/meet_the_journalists_against_journalism_club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13357858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The clique of media figures outraged when news outlets challenge power has a new member: Washington Post higher-ups]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/">David Gregory</a> to <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnbcs-andrew-ross-sorkin-id-almost-arrest-glenn-greenwald-over-snowden-debacle/">Andrew Ross Sorkin</a> to <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/11/david-brooks-analysis-of-edward-snowden">David Brooks</a>, the ranks of Washington's hottest new club continues to swell. Call it Journalists Against Journalism -- a group of reporters and pundits who are outraged that whistle-blowers and news organizations are colluding to expose illegal government surveillance. To this club, the best journalism is not the kind that challenges power or even merely sheds light on the inner workings of government; it is about protecting power and keeping the lights off.</p><p>Before today, this club could be seen as a collection of individuals. But not anymore, thanks to the hard-to-believe house editorial of the Washington Post titled <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-to-keep-edward-snowden-from-leaking-more-nsa-secrets/2013/07/01/4e8bbe28-e278-11e2-a11e-c2ea876a8f30_story.html">"Plugging the Leaks in the Edward Snowden Case."</a> Inveighing against the disclosures of NSA contractor Edward Snowden, the paper wrote that "the first U.S. priority should be to prevent Mr. Snowden from leaking information" and then fretted that Snowden "is reported to have stolen many more documents, encrypted copies of which may have been given to allies such as the WikiLeaks organization."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/meet_the_journalists_against_journalism_club/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/meet_the_journalists_against_journalism_club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s war on journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Carr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps most troubling? The president is being aided by a cadre of Benedict Arnolds within the media itself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of all the harrowing story lines in journalist Jeremy Scahill's new film "Dirty Wars," the one about Abdulelah Haider Shaye best spotlights the U.S. government's new assault against press freedom.</p><p>Shaye is the Yemeni journalist who in 2009 exposed his government's coverup of a U.S. missile strike that, according to McClatchy's newswire, ended up killing "dozens of civilians, including 14 women and 21 children." McClatchy notes that for the supposed crime of committing journalism, Shaye was sentenced to five years in prison following a trial that "was widely condemned as a sham" by watchdog groups and experts who noted that the prosecution did not "offer any substantive evidence to support (its) charges."</p><p>What, you might ask, does this have to do with the American government's attitude toward press freedom? That's where Scahill's movie comes in. As the film shows, when international pressure moved the Yemeni government to finally consider pardoning Shaye, President Obama personally intervened, using a phone call with Yemen's leader to halt the journalist's release.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/obamas_war_on_journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we love fugitives so much?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.J. Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitey Bulger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fugitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason bourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher dorner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Snowden and Whitey Bulger, to Jesse James and Dorner, here's why we treat outlaws on the run as heroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">No matter what you think of Edward Snowden, it's undeniable that the former CIA computer whiz has a committed fan base across the globe, as he continues to evade authorities in a high-tech, high-stakes global manhunt. Offering all the political intrigue and personal drama of the "Bourne Identity" series with the benefit of being real, he’s already become a folk hero -- not just to online activists who worry about an increasingly omniscient surveillance state, but to many ordinary Americans.</p><p dir="ltr">In this way, Snowden is a quintessential American outlaw hero, albeit updated for the modern era. With many Americans cheering him on as he evades the law -- moving from Hong Kong to Moscow and possibly some other nation, seemingly outwitting the U.S. government all the while --  it echoes the reception many other fugitives like Whitey Bulger, O.J. Simpson (during the famous Bronco chase), and Bucky Phillips all received.</p><p dir="ltr">All of which raises a key question: Why do Americans so often root for outlaws on the run?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frank Rich skewers David Gregory: Move him to &#8220;Today&#8221; show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/frank_rich_skewers_david_gregory_move_him_to_today_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/frank_rich_skewers_david_gregory_move_him_to_today_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Lauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYMag editor mocks the "Meet the Press" host for suggesting Glenn Greenwald should be charged with a crime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Longtime New York Times columnist and current New York magazine editor Frank Rich today <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/06/frank-rich-gay-marriage-wins-roberts-be-damned.html">lambasted "Meet the Press" host David Gregory</a> for challenging Glenn Greenwald's integrity as a journalist and a citizen.</p><p>On Sunday, Gregory asked Greenwald, the Guardian reporter who published Edward Snowden's NSA leak, "Why shouldn't you, Mr. Greenwald, be charged with a crime?" New York magazine points out that Gregory's question "all but accused the Guardian's Glenn Greenwald of aiding and abetting Edward Snowden's fugitive travels."</p><p>But Rich rebuts: "Is David Gregory a journalist?"</p><p>"As a thought experiment, name one piece of news he has broken, one beat he’s covered with distinction, and any memorable interviews he’s conducted that were not with John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Dick Durbin or Chuck Schumer."</p><p>"Presumably if Gregory had been around 40 years ago," Rich adds snidely, "he also would have accused the Times of aiding and abetting the enemy when it published Daniel Ellsberg’s massive leak of the Pentagon Papers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/frank_rich_skewers_david_gregory_move_him_to_today_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/frank_rich_skewers_david_gregory_move_him_to_today_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal analysis: How strong is the government&#8217;s case against Snowden?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/legal_analysis_how_strong_is_the_governments_case_against_snowden/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/legal_analysis_how_strong_is_the_governments_case_against_snowden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[espionage act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snowden's own description suggests he may be guilty of the crimes alleged. But in criminal law, motives are crucial]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Edward Snowden a hero or a criminal? Phrasing the debate over Snowden’s actions in this way, as ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos did <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/video/edward-snowden-hero-criminal-160020781.html">earlier this week</a>, obscures the possibility that he may well be both things at once.</p><p>Given his own description of his behavior, there is little doubt Snowden is guilty of the crimes with which the government has now charged him: theft of government property, unauthorized communication of national defense information, and willful communication of classified communications intelligence information to an unauthorized person. (As was reported <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/snowden_seeking_asylum_in_ecuador_says_wikileaks/">this weekend</a>, Snowden has left Hong Kong and is seeking asylum in another country via Russia.)</p><p>Writing in the Guardian, Glenn Greenwald <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/22/snowden-espionage-charges">argues</a> that there is something perverse about charging Snowden with what, under federal law, is a violation of the Espionage Act:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/legal_analysis_how_strong_is_the_governments_case_against_snowden/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/legal_analysis_how_strong_is_the_governments_case_against_snowden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why shouldn&#8217;t David Gregory be charged with a crime?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark boal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Clapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Ellsberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NBC host thinks Glenn Greenwald may be a criminal. Here are 10 items to ponder about this gross double standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks into the hullabaloo surrounding whistle-blower Edward Snowden and Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, one thing is clear: They did not just reveal potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the government -- including possible <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/james_clapper_must_go/">perjury</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/put_the_nsa_on_trial/">unlawful spying</a> and <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/fisc-will-not-object-release-2011-court-opinion-confirmed-nsas-illegal-surveillance-1305023">unconstitutional surveillance</a>. They also laid bare in historic fashion the powerful double standards that now define most U.S. media coverage of the American government -- the kind that portray those who challenge power as criminals, and those who worship it as heroes deserving legal immunity. Indeed, after "Meet the Press" host David Gregory's instantly notorious performance yesterday, it is clear Snowden's revelations so brazenly exposed these double standards that it will be difficult for the Washington press corps to ever successfully hide them again.</p><p>The best way to see these double standards is to ponder 10 simple questions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>254</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSA can access collected data without a warrant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/nsa_can_access_collected_data_without_a_warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/nsa_can_access_collected_data_without_a_warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leaked documents: FISA court rulings allow the agency to make use of "inadvertently" collected data]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its latest revelation about National Security Agency surveillance based on documents leaked by whistle-blower Edward Snowden, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/20/fisa-court-nsa-without-warrant">the Guardian reported Thursday</a> that the NSA not only hoards vast swaths of communications information, but is also able to use that personal data without a warrant.</p><p>Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judges "have signed off on broad orders which allow the NSA to make use of information 'inadvertently' collected from domestic US communications without a warrant," Glenn Greenwald and James Ball reported, publishing two leaked documents, which detail the procedures the intelligence agency must follow to target individuals.</p><p>Via the Guardian:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/nsa_can_access_collected_data_without_a_warrant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/nsa_can_access_collected_data_without_a_warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here come the Edward Snowden truthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/here_come_the_edward_snowden_truthers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/here_come_the_edward_snowden_truthers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[False Flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some think he's a CIA plant, others say he's a useful idiot. But they all agree: Something stinks to high heaven!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time there's a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/sandy_hook_truthers_are_not_giving_up/">shooting at an elementary school</a> or a bombing <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/the_rights_new_boston_conspiracy_theory/">at a marathon</a>, people harboring an obsession with -- or financial interest in -- conspiracy theories will jump on inconsistencies to tear down the "official narrative" and replace it with their own, no matter how far-fetched. So perhaps it was only a matter of time before the conspiracists set their eternally skeptical eyes on another target. Meet the Edward Snowden truthers.</p><p>What's surprising about the Snowden theories is that one might think he'd be a sympathetic figure to people deeply skeptical of government power. But instead of holding him up as hero (or even a traitor), some are intent on labeling him a co-conspirator.</p><p>Perhaps the most prominent Snowden truther is Naomi Wolf, whom Al Gore reportedly paid <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/01/us/adviser-pushes-gore-to-be-leader-of-the-pack.html">$15,000 a <em>month</em></a> to advise his presidential campaign. People were a little surprised Friday when the prominent feminist author and activist posted a lengthy <a href="https://www.facebook.com/notes/naomi-wolf/my-creeping-concern-that-the-nsa-leaker-is-not-who-he-purports-to-be-/10151559239607949">essay on her Facebook page</a> wondering if Snowden may actually be a plant from "the Police State."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/here_come_the_edward_snowden_truthers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/here_come_the_edward_snowden_truthers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel Ellsberg: Edward Snowden is a patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/daniel_ellsberg_edward_snowden_is_a_patriot_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/daniel_ellsberg_edward_snowden_is_a_patriot_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Ellsberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man behind the Pentagon Papers talks NSA, Bradley Manning and whistle-blowers' importance in a new interview]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BRAD FRIEDMAN</strong>: In 1975, Senator Frank Church spoke of the National Security Agency in these terms - the NSA - he said, "I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America. And we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross that abyss. "That is the abyss, said Senator Frank Church, "from which there is no return."</p><p>Is that the case? We're going to find out momentarily from my guest, Daniel Ellsberg.</p><p><em>The Guardian</em> asserted last week --- actually over the weekend in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance">Glenn Greenwald's article</a> in which Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor, was outed as the leaker, the whistle-blower, of these NSA documents we've been seeing over the past week --- <em>The</em> Guardian asserted that former NSA contractor Edward Snowden "will go down in history as one of America's most consequential whistle-blowers alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning." So of course it seems like a good time to talk with Daniel Ellsberg about all of this. We can't really talk with Bradley Manning, unfortunately. He's in a military brig facing his trial.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/daniel_ellsberg_edward_snowden_is_a_patriot_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/daniel_ellsberg_edward_snowden_is_a_patriot_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly, white people care about privacy incursions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For many, government surveillance has been a regular part of life, especially since 9/11. So, why the outrage now?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a result of the recent <a href="http://truth-out.org/news/item/16882-a-massive-surveillance-state-glenn-greenwald-exposes-covert-nsa-program-collecting-calls-emails">revelations about National Security Agency surveillance</a>, a fierce debate about privacy and the powers of security services has been raging. But in light of the fact that such an approach has long been taken toward a segment of Americans, one might ask why it required this latest series of developments to spur discussion.</p><p>Mounting domestic and international pressure against the PRISM surveillance program has forced the Obama administration to concede that the revelations have sparked “<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/10/patriot-act-nsa-surveillance-review">an appropriate debate</a>.” Concern – and in some cases, outrage -- at these measures has been expressed by general members <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113443/nsa-surveillance-poll-prism-not-popular-phone-record-collection">of the public</a> and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-11/how-rand-paul-can-take-on-the-nsa.html">politicians</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/10/obama-pressured-explain-nsa-surveillance">many of whom made no secret of their anger or mistrust toward them</a>. Given the seriousness of the allegations, the outrage expressed at such a situation is obviously justified; the courage of the leaker and those taking the fight to government, commendable.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/suddenly_white_people_care_about_privacy_incursions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Peter King wants to prosecute journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_take_legal_action_against_glenn_greenwald/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_take_legal_action_against_glenn_greenwald/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald responds: "Everything he said" is based on a "blatant lie"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_prosecute_journalists_who_report_on_leaks/singleton/">once again</a> called for prosecuting journalists who report on leaked information, this time singling out Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, who broke the story on the NSA's phone surveillance program.</p><p>"I'm talking about Greenwald," King said on Fox News. "Greenwald, not only did he disclose this information, he has said he has names of CIA agents and assets around the world and they're threatening to disclose that. The last time that was done in this country, we saw a CIA station chief murdered in Greece. No right is absolute and even the press has certain restrictions."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_take_legal_action_against_glenn_greenwald/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_take_legal_action_against_glenn_greenwald/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: Prosecute journalists who report on leaks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_prosecute_journalists_who_report_on_leaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_prosecute_journalists_who_report_on_leaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Republican said there is an "obligation" against reporters who "severely compromise national security"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., argued to CNN's Anderson Cooper that journalists who report on leaked information that could "so severely compromise national security" should be prosecuted. “Actually, if they willingly knew that this was classified information, I think action should be taken, especially on something of this magnitude," King said, in response to Cooper's question about whether both the leakers and the journalists deserve punishment.</p><p>King continued:</p><blockquote><p>I think something on this magnitude, there is an obligation, both moral but also legal, I believe, against a reporter disclosing something which would so severely compromise national security. As a practical matter, I guess there have been in the past several years, a number of reporters who have been prosecuted under it, so the answer is yes to your question.</p></blockquote><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content_type=content_item&amp;layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;content=6JPX1K06CJ5V3HBC&amp;widget_type_cid=svp&amp;read_more=1" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="420" height="421"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_prosecute_journalists_who_report_on_leaks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/peter_king_prosecute_journalists_who_report_on_leaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you know nothing about whistle-blowers, don&#8217;t cover them</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/if_you_know_nothing_about_whistleblowers_dont_cover_whistleblowers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/if_you_know_nothing_about_whistleblowers_dont_cover_whistleblowers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan McArdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Toobin, Megan McArdle and Joe Klein spew ignorance and contempt for a process they don't understand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pundits and those with ties to the power elite, whom media conglomerates allow to appear on television regularly, happen to have a profound appreciation for all apparatuses and mechanisms of the national security state. They all also hold the view that if Congress and federal judges have not opposed the expansion of massive and secret surveillance programs then it must all be legal and not in violation of the Fourth Amendment or any other laws.</p><p>From that view flows the reaction that anyone can see on television right now as the media discusses Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency whistle-blower whose disclosures on top-secret surveillance programs were published by the Guardian‘s Glenn Greenwald.</p><p>Jeffrey Toobin, a senior CNN legal analyst and contributor to the New Yorker, was leading the charge against Snowden in the media by characterizing him as a “grandiose narcissist who deserves to be in prison.” He appeared on Piers Morgan’s program later in the evening and said, “I think there are right ways to do it and there are wrong ways to do it, and by a 29-year-old kid, just throwing open the safe and giving away documents that people have devoted years of their lives to creating and protecting. That’s the wrong way to protest.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/if_you_know_nothing_about_whistleblowers_dont_cover_whistleblowers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/if_you_know_nothing_about_whistleblowers_dont_cover_whistleblowers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we broke the NSA story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/qa_with_laura_poitras_the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/qa_with_laura_poitras_the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive: Laura Poitras tells Salon about getting contacted by Edward Snowden, and reveals more footage is coming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Salon's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/">biographical sketch</a> on Laura Poitras went live, the award-winning documentary filmmaker agreed to a phone interview, her first since she helped reveal the scope of the National Security Agency's digital surveillance. "I feel a certain need to be cautious about not wanting to do the work for the government," she told Salon, but agreed to clarify some parts of her role in the story.</p><p>Poitras is still in Hong Kong, where she is filming the story behind the story -- including her co-author on the Guardian story and former Salon columnist Glenn Greenwald -- for her forthcoming documentary on whistle-blowers and leaks. In a wide-ranging interview, she explained how she first made contact with Snowden, her reaction to the possible future investigation into his leaks, and why Snowden didn't go to the New York Times. What follows is a lightly edited transcript.</p><p><strong>So how did this all begin?</strong></p><p>I was originally contacted in January, anonymously.</p><p><strong>By Edward Snowden?</strong></p><p>Well, I didn't know who it was.</p><p><strong>What was the format?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/qa_with_laura_poitras_the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/qa_with_laura_poitras_the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The woman behind the NSA scoops</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura Poitras is "one of the bravest and most brilliant people I've ever met," Glenn Greenwald tells Salon(Updated)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, we know the revelations about U.S. government surveillance published in the Guardian and the Washington Post in the past week have the same source, Edward Snowden. And despite what Politico, in typically overheated fashion, is <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/edward-snowden-nsa-leaker-glenn-greenwald-barton-gellman-92505.html">calling</a> a "feud" between reporters at the two news organizations, they share something else: the involvement of award-winning documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.</p><p>Despite the customary competition between news sources -- heightened, in this case, by differing <a href="http://observer.com/2013/06/morning-media-mix-11/">accounts</a> of how the story was reported -- Poitras achieved the unusual distinction of sharing a byline both with Barton Gellman on the June 6 Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/us-intelligence-mining-data-from-nine-us-internet-companies-in-broad-secret-program/2013/06/06/3a0c0da8-cebf-11e2-8845-d970ccb04497_story.html">story</a> on PRISM and with Glenn Greenwald and Ewan MacAskill on the June 8 Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance">story</a> naming Edward Snowden as a source. In the accompanying video interview of Snowden, Greenwald is credited as “interviewer” and Poitras as “filmmaker.” Greenwald <a href="https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/344040301972815872">wrote</a> in a tweet this morning, “The reality is that Laura Poitras and I have been working with [Snowden] since February, long before anyone spoke to Bart Gellman.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/the_woman_behind_the_nsa_scoops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenwald&#8217;s long battle against the surveillance state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/greenwalds_long_battle_against_the_surveillance_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/greenwalds_long_battle_against_the_surveillance_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frank church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While at Salon, the former litigator wrote regularly of the danger of ever-expanding dragnets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The series of revelations last week that the National Security Agency (NSA) was daily hoarding data on every phone and online communication inside and coming from the U.S. were the finest examples of Glenn Greenwald's bold journalistic work in shining light on the troubling operations of government.</p><p>Greenwald's illuminations on the surveillance state are not new, however. Throughout his career and time at Salon, he argued against the expanding surveillance dragnet, the government agencies, private contractors and political ideologies upholding it.</p><p>During<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=4&amp;ved=0CEQQFjAD&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2F2012%2F07%2F01%2Fchallenging_the_surveillance_state%2F&amp;ei=vwm2Uc24La-y0AHToYDYBA&amp;usg=AFQjCNGuXgSsMD2oXL4-t5QaNjyVvNu99w&amp;bvm=bv.47534661,d.dmQ"> a speech</a> at the Socialism 2012 conference, Greenwald called the creeping surveillance state -- with the expansive NSA hoarding complex at its center -- an impediment to any efforts to meaningfully challenge the political status quo:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fao4Z8JooxY" frameborder="0" width="448" height="252"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/greenwalds_long_battle_against_the_surveillance_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/greenwalds_long_battle_against_the_surveillance_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guardian editor: Lack of skepticism in U.S. national security reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/guardian_editor_lack_of_skepticism_in_u_s_national_security_reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/guardian_editor_lack_of_skepticism_in_u_s_national_security_reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NSA leaks also raise attendant and urgent questions about who gets to be a protected journalist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a U.K.-based newspaper (albeit its U.S. operation) and a writer based in Brazil (our old friend Glenn Greenwald) at the forefront of breaking the latest historic revelations about the sprawling NSA spy dragnet. For Janine Gibson, editor-in-chief of Guardian U.S., this is no accident given a poverty she sees in robust national security reporting in the U.S., underpinned by a misplaced patriotism. She told <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/09/guardian-us-nsa-leaks_n_3412769.html">HuffPo:</a></p><blockquote><p>[T]here is a lack of skepticism on a whole in the media on the issue of national security." In the U.S., she said, there can be "a sense that it is unpatriotic to question the role that the security services play."</p></blockquote><p>Indeed, Gibson's comments are supported by certain facts that emerged in Bradley Manning's pretrial hearing. The private noted in a statement that he had <a href="http://raniakhalek.com/2013/02/28/bradley-manning-first-tried-leaking-to-new-york-times-and-washington-post-to-no-avail/">attempted to approach</a> the New York Times, the Washington Post and Politico with his document trove -- all of whom turned him away -- before he provided WikiLeaks with the classified information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/guardian_editor_lack_of_skepticism_in_u_s_national_security_reporting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/guardian_editor_lack_of_skepticism_in_u_s_national_security_reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who are the real criminals in NSA case?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/who_are_the_real_criminals_in_nsa_case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/who_are_the_real_criminals_in_nsa_case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Taibbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whistle-blower Edward Snowden was simply doing what the government said: "If you see something, say something"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Permanent Washington's reactions to the Guardian's <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data">ongoing</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informant-global-datamining">revelations</a> about the Obama administration's unprecedented mass surveillance system have been at once boringly predictable and incredibly revealing. They are so revealing, in fact, that we are left with a troubling question that a civilized society should never even have to ask: Namely, who are the true criminals -- those who violate the law, or those, like <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance">29-year-old Edward Snowden,</a> who blow the whistle on the violations?</p><p>Before getting to that monumental query, let's first review officialdom's reactions to the NSA story that are leading to it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/who_are_the_real_criminals_in_nsa_case/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/who_are_the_real_criminals_in_nsa_case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>165</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Dirty Wars&#8221; &#8212; and a soiled presidency</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anwar al-Awlaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Scahill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporter Jeremy Scahill's riveting film helps explain how the "transformational presidency" turned to nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what it’s come to for Barack Obama: Reality has sunk in for many Americans, who at last understand that the guy we elected on the naive expectation that he would undo the excesses of the Bush-Cheney national security state has instead made them much worse. It will be difficult, if not impossible, for Obama to escape this legacy now. He is the drone president, the assassination president, the domestic-surveillance president, whose entire administration has a professionalized passion for secrecy that makes the low-rent paranoids of the Nixon White House look like Keystone Kops. I did not suspect that I would ever again find an occasion to quote a Sarah Palin gag line, but hey: How <em>is</em> that hopey-changey stuff workin’ out for ya?</p><p>There are numerous ways of understanding this disheartening turn of events. Maybe the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/20/obamas-inauguration-bush-_n_159316.html">secret note</a> that George W. Bush left in the top drawer of the Resolute desk on Jan. 20, 2009, contained a “Manchurian Candidate”-style code word that switched on the programming! Or maybe, somewhat more plausibly, the entire secret apparatus of American counterterrorism at home and abroad has become an independent and self-replicating organism, a Hydra-headed monster that can’t be killed. The president himself indirectly took that tack on Friday, when he tackled questions about the surveillance revelations for the first time, during a supposedly unrelated press conference.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Shows meet Glenn Greenwald!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The punditry experts of "This Week" and "Face the Nation" try to process the Guardian writer's spying revelations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to your recap of this week's "Sunday shows," where the hot topic is how <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/government_collects_millions_of_phone_records_daily/">the government has access</a> to everyone's phone and Facebook and video sex chats all the time, EVERYONE FREAK OUT, NOW. We'll be watching ABC's "This Week," NBC's "Meet the Press" and CBS' "Face the Nation," and yes, in that priority order.</p><p>"This Week" promises to be a grand old time, as some producer has let civil liberties reporter and commentator Glenn"zilla" Greenwald on national television again to scorch the earth. Greenwald, of course, has been the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/glenn-greenwald">lead reporter</a> behind a number of top-secret <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order">leak</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data">reports</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/07/obama-china-targets-cyber-overseas">this week.</a></p><p>"You are really on a roll," George Stephanopoulos congratulates Greenwald, of "the Guardian newspaper." (Full disclosure: I am a contributor to the Guardian U.S.) What are the key findings of your stories this week? Greenwald, talking super-fast to get it all in, has two. From the transcript:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>