<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/global_warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t cry climate-change wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornadoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moore tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For now, blaming the Moore, Okla., tornado on global warming is bad science and bad politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as pictures and videos of the devastation in Moore, Oklahoma, started to spread through social media networks, so too did the angry and anguished tweets about climate change.</p><p>[embedtweet id="336595951336685568"]</p><p>It's an understandable reaction. We don't know for sure yet, but Monday's tornado may turn out to be the worst ever on record. In the larger context of a world in which extreme weather events appear to be increasing in frequency and intensity, it's natural to look for a culprit when confronted with unthinkable carnage.</p><p>In the New Yorker, Amy Davidson <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/05/a-tornado-hits-moore-oklahoma.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">reflected the same urge,</a> while being careful not to make a direct connection between climate change and tornadoes.</p><blockquote><p>Every extreme weather event these days provokes questions about climate change; that is because, as Elizabeth Kolbert notes in this week’s Comment, the climate has changed extremely. Tornadoes, as it happens, have been an area of some controversy: two years ago saw a spike, but then last year a low. We’ll see; it will be for scientists to sort out how currents and temperatures and other factors fed into this storm. <em>Climate change means, more than all the lines on charts always going in one direction, that the weather rhythms we think we know by heart, and that we’ve built our cities and lives around, are all out of sync.</em></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media indifference enables global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/media_indifference_enables_global_warming_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/media_indifference_enables_global_warming_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Day the Earth Stood Still]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Whitehouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide levels are as high as they've been in millions of years. Why isn't this a bigger story?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Say goodnight, Earthlings.</p><p>That message — plus the slimmest of shots at an eleventh-hour reprieve — was announced to the people of the world last week.</p><p>When this happens in science fiction — 1951’s “The Day the Earth Stood Still” is the classic — the planet pays attention.  The flying saucer lands; an alien, in this case played by Michael Rennie, emerges; a final warning is issued:  Stop it.  If you don’t, you’re doomed.</p><p>Back then, the “it” was violence — the Cold War, and the threat of nuclear midnight.  Last week, it was climate change — greenhouse gases, and the promise of ecological extinction.</p><p>“Heat-Trapping Gas Passes Milestone, Raising Fears,” ran the headline on the front page lead <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">story</a> in Saturday’s New York Times, with this sub-head: “CO2 at Level Not Seen in Millions of Years, Portending Major Climate Changes.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/media_indifference_enables_global_warming_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/media_indifference_enables_global_warming_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is climate change fueling an epidemic?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valley Fever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outbreaks of valley fever have been attributed in part to climbing temperatures in California and Arizona]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a><br /> If you haven’t heard of valley fever, you’re not alone. Although cases in states like California are rising, public awareness is low and misdiagnoses from doctors are sadly high. The AP <a href="http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2013-05-05/fever-hits-thousands-parched-west-farm-region#.UYrOTis4XBC">reported</a> an 850 percent spike in cases across the country from 1998 to 2011, with California and Arizona being the worst states.</p><p>“The fever has hit California’s agricultural heartland particularly hard in recent years, with incidence dramatically increasing in 2010 and 2011,” <a href="http://lubbockonline.com/filed-online/2013-05-05/fever-hits-thousands-parched-west-farm-region#.UYrOTis4XBC">wrote</a> the AP’s Gosia Wozniacka. “The disease — which is prevalent in arid regions of the United States, Mexico, Central and South America — can be contracted by simply breathing in fungus-laced spores from dust disturbed by wind as well as human or animal activity.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/is_climate_change_fueling_an_epidemic_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: climate change risks a third of animals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The habitats of many common plants and animals poised to shrink dramatically]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new report in the journal Nature Climate Change, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/12/climate-change-habitat-animal-plant_n_3263046.html">flagged by Reuters</a>, more than half of all plants, a third of animals are at risk to due to destruction of habitats as the climate changes. Last week scientists marked a symbolic but grim <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/">milestone</a> -- carbon dioxide levels reached an average daily level that surpassed 400 parts per million, the highest concentration on Earth in millions of years. With the rise in global temperatures and changing rainfall patterns, the new study finds that many common animals and plants risk extinction:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/study_climate_change_risks_a_third_of_animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CO2 levels pass feared milestone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists report that the amount of the gas has not been this high in at least 3 million years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what climate scientists are calling a moment that "symbolizes that so far we have failed miserably in tackling this problem,” carbon dioxide levels have reportedly reached a long-feared milestone. The New York Times reported that this concentration of the gas on Earth has not been seen for millions of years. Via the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/science/earth/carbon-dioxide-level-passes-long-feared-milestone.html?hp&amp;_r=0">NYT:</a></p><blockquote><p>Scientific monitors reported that the gas had reached an average daily level that surpassed 400 parts per million — just an odometer moment in one sense, but also a sobering reminder that decades of efforts to bring human-produced emissions under control are faltering.</p> <p>The best available evidence suggests the amount of the gas in the air has not been this high for at least 3 million years, before humans evolved, and scientists believe the rise portends large changes in the climate and the level of the sea.</p> <p>“It symbolizes that so far we have failed miserably in tackling this problem,” said Pieter P. Tans, who runs the monitoring program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration that reported the new reading.</p> <p>Ralph Keeling, who runs another monitoring program at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego, said a continuing rise could be catastrophic. “It means we are quickly losing the possibility of keeping the climate below what people thought were possibly tolerable thresholds,” he said.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/co2_levels_pass_feared_milestone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is America the last empire?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_america_the_last_empire_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_america_the_last_empire_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How global warming could spell the end of the global superpower -- and the planet itself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It stretched from the Caspian to the Baltic Sea, from the middle of Europe to the Kurile Islands in the Pacific, from Siberia to Central Asia.  Its nuclear arsenal held <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons" target="_blank">45,000 warheads</a>, and its military had <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Zv_IV4jucKAC&amp;pg=PA4&amp;dq=odom+soviet,+1998,+5.3+million&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=q_J-UcO_CIX54APop4HoBA&amp;ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=odom%20soviet%2C%201998%2C%205.3%20million&amp;f=false" target="_blank">five million</a> troops under arms.  There had been nothing like it in Eurasia since the Mongols conquered China, took parts of Central Asia and the Iranian plateau, and rode into the Middle East, looting Baghdad.  Yet when the Soviet Union collapsed in December 1991, by far the poorer, weaker imperial power disappeared.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_america_the_last_empire_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_america_the_last_empire_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the &#8220;family values,&#8221; anti-environment hypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drudge Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the right wing is so concerned with family, why can't it make slight sacrifices to avert disaster for our kids?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">newspaper column</a> on Friday highlighted an easy to understand fact: According to <a href="http://www.worldwatch.org/files/pdf/Livestock%20and%20Climate%20Change.pdf">World Bank data</a>, the livestock industry is responsible for between 18 percent and 51 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions. My column also predicted that by simply mentioning that fact, I would receive all sorts of angry email and tweets from conservatives not refuting the data, but declaring that they will eat even more meat to prove some incoherent point about "freedom." And not surprisingly, over the weekend, the prediction came true, especially after Drudge posted a link to an <a href="http://cnsnews.com/blog/dan-gainor/lefty-sirota-we-are-incinerating-planetbecause-too-many-us-eat-cheeseburgers">outraged screed</a> about the column (notice: The screed didn't bother to include one single data point or fact in refutation of the World Bank study).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/pro_family_values_anti_environment_hypocrites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting rich off global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/getting_rich_off_global_warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/getting_rich_off_global_warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adaptation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local officials and enviros are making plans for a post-global warming America. And so are profit-seeking companies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the opening morning of the inaugural National Adaptation Forum, I was eating breakfast at a stand-up table in the exhibition hall when a mustachioed man of middle age plopped his cherry Danish next to my pile of conference literature, a mess of pamphlets and reports with titles like <em>Getting Climate Smart: A Water Preparedness Guide for State Action</em>, and <em>Successful Adaptation: Linking Science and Policy in a Rapidly Changing World</em>. The nametag dangling above the Danish identified the man as Michael Hughes, director of public works for the Chicago suburb of Elmhurst. Like many attendees, Hughes was part of a new national emergency-response team without being fully aware of it. He had arrived in Denver knowing little about “adaptation,” the anemic catchall for attempts to fortify our natural and built environments against the epochal temperature spike in progress.</p><p>“I hadn’t even heard the term ‘adaptation’ a month ago,” he told me, taking a bite.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/getting_rich_off_global_warming/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/getting_rich_off_global_warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blizzards in May. Wild fires. Is this global warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/blizzards_in_may_wild_fires_is_this_global_warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/blizzards_in_may_wild_fires_is_this_global_warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandy has been followed by massive spring snowfalls. Here's what to look for as our climate-change awareness grows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Since We Don’t Know Whether and How Much People Might Cut Greenhouse-Gas Emissions, It’s Hard to Know Exactly How High the Temperature Will Go by 2100.</strong></p><p>Yogi Berra is credited with having said that “predictions are hard to make, especially about the future.” It’s true, but climate scientists do their best anyway. Computer models can do a pretty good job of simulating real-world events, but they can’t ever replicate them exactly (you’ve probably noticed this firsthand if you’ve ever seen a computer-animated human in motion). Even well-understood phenomena, like the physics of flight, can’t be simulated perfectly, but aeronautical engineers know they can rely on flight simulations because they know how closely their models represent the real world.</p><p>Similarly, models of the planet’s climate can’t simulate today’s climate precisely, but they do a good job of approximating it (and they’re getting better, as the models are continually improved and tested). The places where models and reality disagree help point out the areas of uncertainty.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/blizzards_in_may_wild_fires_is_this_global_warming/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/blizzards_in_may_wild_fires_is_this_global_warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would we give up burgers to stop climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report suggests that adjusting our diet can slow global warming. Now let's see if our politics will let us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed the news, humanity spent the Earth Day week reaching another sad milestone in the history of catastrophic climate change: For the first time, measurements of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere surpassed 400 parts per million, aka way above what our current ecosystem can handle.</p><p>Actually, you probably did miss the news because most major media outlets didn't cover it in a serious way, if at all. Instead, they and their audiences evidently view such information as far less news-, buzz- and tweet-worthy than (among other things) the opening of George W. Bush's library and President Obama's jokes at the White House Correspondents Dinner.</p><p>Such an appetite for distraction, no doubt, comes from both those who deny the problem of climate change and those who acknowledge the crisis but nonetheless look away from what feels like an unsolvable mess.</p><p>That sense of hopelessness is understandable. After all, some of the most hyped ways to reduce carbon emissions -- electric cars, mass-scale renewable energy power plants, etc. -- require the kind of technological transformations that can seem impossibly unrealistic at a time when Congress can't even pass a budget.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/would_we_give_up_burgers_to_stop_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We tried to weaponize the weather</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cold War secrets: Melting polar ice cap with nukes, changing the sea level, even LSD weapons were all on the table]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The years between the ﬁrst hydrogen bomb tests and the Limited Test Ban Treaty in 1963 saw more than just increased anxiety about the eﬀects of nuclear testing on weather. They also saw increased interest in large-scale, purposeful environmental modiﬁcation. Most climate modiﬁcation enthusiasts spoke of increasing global temperatures, in the hopes that this would increase the quantity of cultivated land and make for fairer weather. Some suggested blackening deserts or snowy areas, to increase absorption of radiation. Covering large areas with carbon dust, so the theory went, would raise temperatures. Alternatively, if several hydrogen bombs were exploded underwater, they might evaporate seawater and create an ice cloud that would block the escape of radiation. Meteorologist Harry Wexler had little patience for those who wanted to add weather and climate modiﬁcation to the set of tools in man’s possession. But by 1958 even he acknowledged that serious proposals for massive changes, using nuclear weapons as tools, were inevitable. Like most professional meteorologists, in the past he had dismissed the idea that hydrogen bombs had aﬀected the weather. But with the prospect of determined experiments designed to bring about such changes, he warned of “the unhappy situation of the cure being worse than the ailment.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/we_tried_to_weaponize_the_weather/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could a carbon fee save us from climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climatologist James Hansen explains how government can stave off global catastrophe -- and what we can do to help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> It’s hard to imagine anyone who has done more to further our understanding of the impacts of climate change than Dr. James Hansen. After 46 years working a scientist and climatogolist for NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Hansen wasn’t content to simply catalog the dangers facing humanity and our planet — he has been ringing the alarm bell. “On a blistering June day in 1988 he was called before a Congressional committee and testified that human-induced global warming had begun,” the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/science/james-e-hansen-retiring-from-nasa-to-fight-global-warming.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">wrote</a> in a recent story about Hansen. “Speaking to reporters afterward in his flat Midwestern accent, he uttered a sentence that would appear in news reports across the land: ‘It is time to stop waffling so much and say that the evidence is pretty strong that the greenhouse effect is here.’”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/could_a_carbon_fee_save_us_from_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Biblical flood proves climate change isn&#8217;t man-made</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["One would have to say the Great Flood is an example of climate change," said Rep. Joe Barton ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Joe Barton, a Republican from Texas, cited the Bible's Great Flood as an example of climate change that proves it's not necessarily man-made.</p><p>"I would point out that if you're a believer in the Bible, one would have to say the Great Flood is an example of climate change and that certainly wasn't because mankind had overdeveloped hydrocarbon energy," Barton said during a Subcommittee on Energy and Power hearing to discuss the Keystone XL pipeline, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/republican-congressman-cites-biblical-great-flood-to-say-cim">BuzzFeed</a> reports.</p><p>He also said that it doesn't necessarily mean he doesn't believe that the climate is changing: "I think you can have an honest difference of opinion of what's causing that change without automatically being either all in that's all because of mankind or it's all just natural. I think there's a divergence of evidence."</p><p>Barton, one of Congress's top recipients of oil company campaign donations, is perhaps best known for <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/18/nation/la-na-oil-barton-20100619">apologizing</a> to BP for what he called a White House "shakedown," after the Obama administration announced that it would set up a $20 billion escrow fund to benefit victims of the 2010 BP oil spill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/house_goper_biblical_flood_proves_climate_change_isnt_man_made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Concern about global warming is growing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But 41 percent say news about climate change is "exaggerated"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/161645/americans-concerns-global-warming-rise.aspx">Gallup poll</a> finds that more Americans are growing concerned about global warming, with 58 percent saying they "personally worry" about the effects of global warming at least a fair amount.</p><p>This is up from 51 percent in 2011.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Public concern about global warming has waxed and waned over the past two decades, ranging between 50% and 72%. The average percentage over time for "worrying a great deal/fair amount" comes in at just under 60%, similar to the March 7-10 reading from Gallup's 2013 Environment poll.</p></blockquote><p>But the poll also finds that 15 percent believe that the effects of global warming will never happen, while 41 percent believe new reports about the subject are exaggerated.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/poll_concern_about_global_warming_is_growing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Democrats destroy the planet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their inability to take a firm stance on issues like the Keystone XL pipeline helps enable global warming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, <em>Time</em> magazine <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/28/im-with-the-tree-huggers/" target="_blank">called</a> the fight over the Keystone XL pipeline that will bring some of the dirtiest energy on the planet from Alberta, Canada, to the U.S. Gulf Coast the “Selma and Stonewall” of the climate movement.</p><p>Which, if you think about it, may be both good news and bad news. Yes, those of us fighting the pipeline have mobilized record numbers of activists: the largest civil disobedience action <a href="http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageServer?pagename=forwardonclimate" target="_blank">in 30 years</a> and 40,000 people on the mall in February for the biggest climate rally in American history. Right now, we’re aiming to get <a href="http://act.350.org/letter/a_million_strong_against_keystone/" target="_blank">a million people to send in public comments</a> about the “environmental review” the State Department is conducting on the feasibility and advisability of building the pipeline.  And there’s good reason to put pressure on.  After all, it’s the same State Department that, as on a previous round of reviews, <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/keystone-xl-contractor-ties-transcanada-state-department" target="_blank">hired</a> “experts” who had once worked as consultants for TransCanada, the pipeline’s builder.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/tk_5_partner_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh rewards child climate skeptic with an iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio host explains that science has become a "branch of the Democrat Party"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his show Thursday, Rush Limbaugh hosted a climate expert to explain how global warming is "a hoax." Sorry, did we say climate expert? We meant 13-year-old kid from Indiana. The young man called into Limbaugh's show and said he had done his own research at the local library for a school project and concluded that it was obvious that man-made climate change is bogus.</p><p>“It was really easy for me to find this evidence, really easy,” said young Alex. “I believe the reason that the liberals do not have the evidence [that it's a hoax] is because they do not want the evidence. They don't want to hear that it's wrong.”</p><p>Alex said he found all the information at the library, because he didn't have a computer. Limbaugh was so impressed that he told Alex he wanted to send him an iPad, assuming his parents were OK with it, in order to help him with future research.</p><p><a href="http://dailyrushbo.com/rush-the-hill-attacks-13-year-old-rush-caller-who-schooled-libs-on-global-warming-hoax/">Circling back today</a>, Limbaugh explained that "exactly as the news media is a branch of the Democrat Party, so too is much of science today." "The global warming scientists are just Democrats, folks. They're all part of an agenda," he continued, "The Democrats have literally politicized everything they can use to expand government, which is their primary objective."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans believe a lot of conspiracy theories</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/americans_believe_a_lot_of_conspiracy_theories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/americans_believe_a_lot_of_conspiracy_theories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global warming is a hoax, Osama bin Laden is still alive and Barack Obama is the anti-Christ, some Americans say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/04/conspiracy-theory-poll-results-.html">PPP</a> survey asked Americans whether they believe in some of the more widespread conspiracy theories, and the results were a bit troubling.</p><p>Thirty-seven percent of voters, including 58 percent of Republicans, believe that global warming in a hoax. Six percent believe Osama bin Laden is still alive, while 13 percent think Barack Obama is the antichrist (including 22 percent of Romney voters). Five percent believe Paul McCartney actually died in 1966.</p><p>Perhaps the weirdest: 4 percent say "they believe 'lizard people' control our societies by gaining political power."</p><p>More from the survey:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/americans_believe_a_lot_of_conspiracy_theories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/americans_believe_a_lot_of_conspiracy_theories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antarctic sea ice expanding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that a summer melt caused by climate change has affected ice shelves in surprising ways]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a>  A summer melt caused by climate change is, counterintuitively, expanding Antarctic sea ice, scientists say.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/benelux">Dutch</a> study <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/8494426/Antarctic-sea-ice-is-expanding" target="_blank">published online in the Nature Geoscience journal</a> said that sea ice around Antarctica has expanded at an accelerated rate of 1.9 percent per decade since 1985, unlike that in the Arctic region. It also notes that cool freshwater from melt underneath Antarctic ice shelves has insulated offshore sea ice from the ocean beneath, which is warming.</p><p>Because the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-21991487" target="_blank">melt water has a relatively low density</a>, it accumulates in the top layer of the ocean, allowing for the cool surface waters to re-freeze more easily during fall and winter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/antarctic_sea_ice_expanding_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 investigative videos of the week: Inside the smog capital of the world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_inside_the_smog_capital_of_the_world_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_inside_the_smog_capital_of_the_world_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The I Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13256144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From China's most polluted city to Tahrir Square in Cairo, a look at the best YouTube has to offer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/theifilestv"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/I-Files-logo_for-light-bkgd-e1362186166136.png" alt="The I Files" align="left" /></a> In the news this week: women fighting for their safety and rights in the Arab Spring, the fraud behind those calorie counts on your favorite foods, and smog so hideous you can see it from space.</p><p>In a continuing partnership with Salon, the editors of The I Files are highlighting our picks for the best investigative videos that illustrate and illuminate what's happening in the world.</p><p>For more stories like these, please take a moment to <a href=" http://goo.gl/0Bc68">subscribe to The I Files channel</a>, YouTube’s one-stop news source. You’ll get a first look at the best videos from all of the major news outlets and select independent producers without the hassle of having to sift through the YouTube clutter. Subscribing is free and causes no damage to the environment.</p><p>“Sexual Assault in Tahrir Square,” Bridgette Auger for GlobalPost</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Zys959EGXWo" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_inside_the_smog_capital_of_the_world_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_inside_the_smog_capital_of_the_world_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there an actual tipping point for global warming?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_there_an_actual_tipping_point_for_global_warming_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_there_an_actual_tipping_point_for_global_warming_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Extreme weather events have scientists wondering whether change to the earth's climate could be precipitous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=rss"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> Is there a chance that <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-planetary-boundaries-help-humanity-manage-environmental-impacts">human intervention</a>—rising temperatures, massive land-use changes, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=biodiversity">biodiversity</a> loss and so on—could “tip” the entire world into a new climatic state? And if so, does that change what we should do about it?</p><p>As far back as 2008 NASA’s James Hansen <a href="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-06-23-1642922053_x.htm">argued</a> that we had crossed a “tipping point” in the Arctic with regard to summer sea ice. The diminishing ice cover had moved past a critical threshold, and from then on levels would drop precipitously toward zero, with little hope of recovery. Other experts now say that recent years have confirmed that particular cliff-fall, and the September 2012 record minimum—an astonishing <a href="http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/sea_ice.html">18 percent lower than 2007’s previous record</a>—was likely no fluke.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_there_an_actual_tipping_point_for_global_warming_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/is_there_an_actual_tipping_point_for_global_warming_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
