<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/global_warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Republican climate folly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/republican_climate_folly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/republican_climate_folly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12917401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As temperatures break records, the GOP holds firm: The less we know about global warming, the better]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever adjective you choose -- ironic? tragic? ludicrous? -- the outcome of a series of budget votes held in the GOP-controlled House on Tuesday was definitely interesting. The chamber was wrangling over a series of amendments to an appropriations bill for the Departments of Commerce and Justice. The battle line was drawn between senior Republicans trying to resist further spending cuts, and young Turks looking to slash and burn.</p><p>In every case but one, the senior Republicans (with the help of Democrats) proved victorious. The lone exception? An amendment proposed by Maryland's Andy Harris, cutting $542,000 in <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/226233-gop-split-leads-house-to-reject-14-billion-in-spending-cuts?wpisrc=nl_wonk">funding for a climate website</a> at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.</p><p>After all, who needs more information about the climate? It's not like there's been anything weird going on with the weather lately.</p><p>Oh wait. On the same day that the House voted to reduce funding for NOAA, <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/4">the agency announced</a> that the United States had just recorded its warmest 12-month period of temperatures since records started being kept in 1895.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/republican_climate_folly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/republican_climate_folly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming hits home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a year of freakish and destructive weather, Americans are finally waking up to the dangers of climate change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Williams River was so languid and lovely last Saturday morning that it was almost impossible to imagine the violence with which it must have been running on August 28, 2011. And yet the evidence was all around: sand piled high on its banks, trees still scattered as if by a giant’s fist, and most obvious of all, a utilitarian temporary bridge where for 140 years a graceful covered bridge had spanned the water.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEs8ubAw7a8&amp;feature=related">YouTube video</a> of that bridge crashing into the raging river was Vermont’s iconic image from its worst disaster in memory, the record flooding that followed Hurricane Irene’s rampage through the state in August 2011.  It claimed dozens of lives, as it cut more than a billion-dollar swath of destruction across the eastern United States.</p><p>I watched it on TV in Washington just after emerging from jail, having been <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175435/bill_mckibben_arrested_at_the_white_house">arrested at the White House</a> during mass protests of the Keystone XL pipeline. Since Vermont’s my home, it took the theoretical -- the ever more turbulent, erratic and dangerous weather that the tar sands pipeline from Canada would help ensure -- and made it all too concrete. It shook me bad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>196</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Every country for itself</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/every_country_for_itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/every_country_for_itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12891841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As American power wanes, we\'re being faced with a dangerous new power vacuum. An expert explains what\'s next]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time in nearly a century, the world doesn't have a clear set of leaders. A generation ago, the G-7 -- France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, United States and Canada -- not only powered the global economy, they also, for better or worse, made the decisions that determined the outcome of the entire world. But over the last several years, the dynamic has changed.</p><p>According to a widely discussed 2010 report by London's Standard Chartered Bank, the world has entered a new "'super-cycle" in which traditional economic hierarchies are being upended. Ever since the financial crisis, the U.S. has lost the economic strength and force of will to be the world's policeman. The number of Americans, for example, who believe the U.S. should "mind its own business internationally" has spiked to a level unseen since the 1950s. Meanwhile, new powers, like China, India and Brazil, have been unwilling to fill the power vacuum the U.S. has left behind. One could argue that this is a nice change from America's aggressive past interventionism, but it has also helped create the global stalemate on everything from global warming to humanitarianism in Syria. And it's a fact that has the potential to radically affect our future, both in positive and negative ways.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/every_country_for_itself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/every_country_for_itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Maldives&#8217; ousted president on climate change and tyranny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/the_maldives_ousted_president_on_climate_change_and_tyranny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/the_maldives_ousted_president_on_climate_change_and_tyranny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12765731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ousted in a February coup, Mohamed Nasheed talks global warming, Islamic radicals and "The Island President"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be too optimistic to claim that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_summit">2009 Copenhagen Summit</a> represented a breakthrough or turning point in the battle against climate change. But it was the first moment when the United States, China and India -- the world's biggest polluters -- all agreed in principle to reduce carbon emissions, and as symbolic statements go, that one was pretty big. Copenhagen also catapulted a most unlikely head of state to pop-star status, at least within the worldwide environmental movement. Mohamed Nasheed, who was then the president of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maldives">Maldives</a> -- Asia's smallest country, both in area and population -- emerged as the developing world's most charismatic and dynamic spokesman on the causes, and the costs, of global warming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/the_maldives_ousted_president_on_climate_change_and_tyranny/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/the_maldives_ousted_president_on_climate_change_and_tyranny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ugly delusions of the educated conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/the_ugly_delusions_of_the_educated_conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/the_ugly_delusions_of_the_educated_conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12414281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better-educated Republicans are more likely to doubt global warming and believe Obama's a Muslim. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can still remember when I first realized how naïve I was in thinking—hoping—that laying out the “facts” would suffice to change politicized minds, and especially Republican<em> </em>ones. It was a typically wonkish, liberal revelation: One based on statistics and data. Only this time, the data were showing, rather awkwardly, that people ignore data and evidence—and often, knowledge and education only make the problem worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Someone had sent me a <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2008/05/08/a-deeper-partisan-divide-over-global-warming/">2008 Pew report</a> documenting the intense partisan divide in the U.S. over the reality of global warming.<sup>. </sup>It’s a divide that, maddeningly for scientists, has shown a paradoxical tendency to widen even as the basic facts about global warming have become more firmly established.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/the_ugly_delusions_of_the_educated_conservative/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/the_ugly_delusions_of_the_educated_conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>362</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate scientist admits swiping documents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/climate_scientist_admits_swiping_documents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/climate_scientist_admits_swiping_documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartland Institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12395841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ MacArthur "genius" award winner concedes a "serious lapse." Global warming skeptics promise legal action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MacArthur Award "genius" grant winner and Berkeley climate scientist Peter Gleick last night confessed to posing as a Heartland Institute board member in emails to the right-wing organization to extract embarrassing internal documents, including the group’s annual budget. Gleick said he was motivated after an anonymous source sent him what was supposed to be the group’s strategy plan.</p><p>As Salon<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/secret_papers_turn_up_heat_on_global_warming_deniers/singleton/"> reported</a> last week,  Heartland  called the strategy document a fake, while tacitly admitting the other documents were authentic.</p><p>Read Gleick’s statement on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-h-gleick/-the-origin-of-the-heartl_b_1289669.html" target="_blank">Hufffington Post</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/climate_scientist_admits_swiping_documents/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/climate_scientist_admits_swiping_documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret papers turn up heat on global-warming deniers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/secret_papers_turn_up_heat_on_global_warming_deniers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/secret_papers_turn_up_heat_on_global_warming_deniers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartland Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12373051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Purloined, secret documents suggest the Heartland Institute could have lobbying plans, in violation of IRS rules]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Al Gore way down <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/al-gore/al-gore-antarctica_b_1245165.html">in Antarctica</a> inspecting melting glaciers, and America’s unusually mild winter providing a respite from seasons of freakish droughts, floods, Nome-style whiteouts and the hurricane that ravaged Vermont, the issue of man-caused global warming has been out of sight and mind.</p><p>But virtually all scientists continue to believe that most indicators suggest the world as we know it is slowly ending, and that humans are to blame.  Nature – oceans, deserts, crops, animals and insects – is in the process of being transformed by rising temperatures due to the fuel we burn to stay warm or cool, and to power factories, cars and jets. In the academies, the argument now is only between experts who predict “bad” and those who predict “catastrophe.”</p><p>Some people don't want to hear it. Supporters of industries that profit from the fossil-fuel status quo routinely challenge those facts, and treat them as political talking points. This week, a dirty trick played on one of the chief industry front groups, the Heartland Institute of Chicago, a major source of “climate denialism,” as the fact-based scientists like to call it, revealed just how politicized the issue has become.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/secret_papers_turn_up_heat_on_global_warming_deniers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/17/secret_papers_turn_up_heat_on_global_warming_deniers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change denial&#8217;s new offensive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12312881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global warming is wreaking devastation, but Big Oil won't give up profits without a planet-destroying fight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we could see the world with a particularly illuminating set of spectacles, one of its most prominent features at the moment would be a giant carbon bubble, whose bursting someday will make the housing bubble of 2007 look like a lark. As yet -- as we shall see -- it’s unfortunately largely invisible to us.</p><p>In compensation, though, we have some truly beautiful images made possible by new technology. Last month, for instance, NASA updated the most iconic photograph in our civilization’s gallery: “Blue Marble,” originally taken from Apollo 17 in 1972. The spectacular new <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/6760135001/in/photostream">high-def image</a> shows a picture of the Americas on January 4th, a good day for snapping photos because there weren’t many clouds.</p><p>It was also a good day because of the striking way it could demonstrate to us just how much the planet has changed in 40 years. As Jeff Masters, the web’s <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/show.html">most widely read</a> meteorologist, <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/article.html?entrynum=2021">explains</a>, “The U.S. and Canada are virtually snow-free and cloud-free, which is extremely rare for a January day. The lack of snow in the mountains of the Western U.S. is particularly unusual. I doubt one could find a January day this cloud-free with so little snow on the ground throughout the entire satellite record, going back to the early 1960s.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>154</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can saving the Amazon save the planet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/can_saving_the_amazon_save_the_planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/can_saving_the_amazon_save_the_planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12276451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A global carbon market aims to curb emissions and slow climate change by protecting rainforests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIMA, Peru — International negotiators are closing in on a new solution for combating climate change — and saving the world’s remaining forests.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a></p><p>Some 20 percent of all greenhouse-gas emissions now come from deforestation, especially in the lush, green band of tropical rainforest that circles the earth.</p><p>That is more than from global transport.</p><p>So representatives from member states involved in UN climate negotiations are attempting to hammer out a way to make it more profitable to protect forests than destroy them.</p><p>By providing cash for maintaining healthy forests, they hope to undermine the economic imperative for poor countries or individuals to cut down trees for timber, to free land for agriculture, or to make way for roads, housing and other infrastructure.</p><p>The idea, known as reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation, or REDD, will be included in the successor to the Kyoto protocol, which is now the only international treaty aimed at climate change.</p><p>The new treaty is due to be finalized in 2015 and take effect in 2020.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/can_saving_the_amazon_save_the_planet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/can_saving_the_amazon_save_the_planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big government, our one shot against crazy storms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/big_government_our_one_shot_against_crazy_storms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/big_government_our_one_shot_against_crazy_storms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12241781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our age of devastating droughts, wildfires and hurricanes, the federal government is more important than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look back on 2011 and you’ll notice a destructive trail of extreme weather slashing through the year. In Texas, it was the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/09/texas-drought-2011-driest-year_n_1191734.html?ref=extreme-weather">driest year</a> ever recorded. An epic drought there killed half a billion trees, touched off wildfires that burned four million acres, and destroyed or damaged thousands of homes and buildings. The costs to agriculture, particularly the cotton and cattle businesses, are <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/479a5254-d722-11e0-bc73-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1j2SxW9jF">estimated</a> at $5.2 billion -- and keep in mind that, in a winter breaking all sorts of records for warmth, the Texas drought is not yet over.</p><p>In August, the East Coast had a close brush with calamity in the form of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Irene_%282011%29">Hurricane Irene</a>. Luckily, that storm had spent most of its energy by the time it hit land near New York City. Nonetheless, its rains did at least <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/hurricanes/cleaning-irene-billion-damage/story?id=14399562#.Tx4HFiPByUc">$7 billion worth</a> of damage, putting it just below the $7.2 billion worth of chaos caused by Katrina back in 2005.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/big_government_our_one_shot_against_crazy_storms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/big_government_our_one_shot_against_crazy_storms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real beneficiaries of energy subsidies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_real_beneficiaries_of_energy_subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_real_beneficiaries_of_energy_subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12189191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't buy the GOP's claims. Oil companies, not green alternatives, are making a killing from the government]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen to the typical conservative rhetoric about energy being thrown around on talk radio or in Republican presidential debates, and you're likely to hear that our government primarily uses its regulatory and financial power to create a destructive green energy boondoggle -- one that enriches a few politically connected Solyndra executives, appeases a bunch of wild-eyed tree huggers, but hides the fact that renewables supposedly can't stand on their own in the private sector.</p><p>In the face of catastrophic climate change and dwindling fossil fuel resources, this cartoonish narrative has gained traction because it invokes the moment's most powerful political metonyms, from implicit allegations of crony capitalism to hippie-themed epithets about environmentalists to "free market" fundamentalism. The underlying idea -- which will only be more amplified in the wake of the Obama administration's <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71598.html">pipeline decision Wednesday</a> -- is that fossil fuels are being persecuted by the American government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_real_beneficiaries_of_energy_subsidies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/the_real_beneficiaries_of_energy_subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What our smog has wrought</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/what_our_smog_has_wrought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/what_our_smog_has_wrought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10415391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brown pollution cloud is making cyclones more intense. We need to stop the partisanship and fix the problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard about the great brown cloud? No, it’s not a new nickname for Donald Trump (his cloud is more an intergalactic nimbus of Aqua Velva and Tang), or the ominous menace in a new Stephen King novel. It’s almost as nasty, though.</p><p>The Atmospheric Brown Cloud, formerly known as the Asian Brown Cloud, is a mass of air pollution hovering over northern India along the southern Himalayas and down across Bangladesh and the Bay of Bengal. The cloud began growing shortly after World War II, a smoggy mass of soot and sulfates from diesel emissions, wood fires and other burning stuff that’s almost two miles thick.</p><p>A new study by scientists from a number of research organizations – including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography – finds that the cloud’s pollutants are making cyclones in the Arabian Sea more intense.</p><p>This is a very big deal, because, as Dean Kuipers writes in the Los Angeles Times, “After the apparent recent increase in the number and intensity of hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico, including the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, climate watchers everywhere have speculated whether these storms were made stronger by industrial or man-made emissions. This is reportedly the first study to indicate that human activity may, in fact, affect large storms.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/what_our_smog_has_wrought/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/what_our_smog_has_wrought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do people still deny climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/why_do_people_still_deny_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/why_do_people_still_deny_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10362941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2011 was plagued by droughts, floods and tornadoes. It's high time we take global warming seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the expense of being tedious, from a climatological perspective, 2011 was a real killer — both figuratively and literally. If not quite so hot as 2010, which tied 1998 for the warmest in recorded history, it’s likely to end up among the top 10, all occurring over the past 15 years according to the World Meteorological Organization.</p><p>Extreme weather plagued much of the world. Drought in East Africa has caused mass starvation; catastrophic floods came to Thailand, southern Africa and Australia. Winter temperatures across Russia averaged 4 degrees Celsius (roughly 9 degrees Fahrenheit) above average. Arctic sea ice was the second lowest on record.</p><p>Closer to home, extreme drought and wildfires turned Texas and adjacent Southwestern states into a living hell last summer. In Texas alone, 3 million acres burned up. Conditions haven’t improved much since. Cattlemen wonder if their way of life can be sustained there very much longer. F5 Tornadoes destroyed huge swaths of Tuscaloosa, Ala., and Joplin, Mo. In August, Vermont and upstate New York suffered record hurricane damage — Vermont!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/why_do_people_still_deny_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/why_do_people_still_deny_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>451</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it time to embrace environmental change?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/is_it_time_to_embrace_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/is_it_time_to_embrace_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10315618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some scientist believe we've already created a new geological epoch -- and it may not be a bad thing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The predictable failure of the Durban conference on climate change to achieve the goals of binding international commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, following on the failures of the earlier Copenhagen conference and the Kyoto treaty, is the result of intellectual failure, not just a lack of political will. At the heart of modern environmentalism is the idea that the planet must be saved from further damage by humanity.  But it is far from clear that this is possible or even that the transformation of nature by human beings with technology is necessarily a bad thing.</p><p>In 2000 Eugene Stoermer, an ecologist, and Paul Crutzen, a Nobel Prize-winning atmospheric chemist, proposed that human agency has so transformed the Earth’s ecosystem that we are living in a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene, or the Human Age. Proponents of the Anthropocene concept disagree about when the era began. Was it with the industrial revolution, which began to release great quantities of pollutants and gases including greenhouse gases into the atmosphere? Was it earlier, when agrarian societies cleared vast tracts of wilderness for farms and pasture? Or was it earlier still, at the end of the last Ice Age, when, according to the “Pleistocene overkill” hypothesis, hunter-gatherers drove large animals including mammoths, mastodons and giant ground sloths to extinction in both the Old World and the New?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/is_it_time_to_embrace_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/is_it_time_to_embrace_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the new Arctic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/welcome_to_the_new_arctic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/welcome_to_the_new_arctic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10299671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melting ice is beginning to transform the world's shipping routes. But will it launch a new Cold War?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 27, 2008, a satellite looking down on the Arctic Ocean observed something possibly unprecedented in human experience. Certainly for the first time in the region’s short recorded history, both the fleetingly navigable routes that skirt this frozen sea – the north-West Passage, and the north-East Passage Russians usually refer to as the northern Sea Route – were ice-free at the same time. For a few weeks that late summer, a ship could circumnavigate the North Pole without being trapped between massive sheets of ice and the bleak shores of northern Siberia or the Canadian archipelago.</p><p>At first sight, this rare climatic coincidence might seem to be of no more than academic interest. The North Pole is after all just a theoretical, symbolically significant point in an empty, frozen sea. Its circumnavigation is a largely meaningless exercise. But crossing the polar ocean is altogether a different matter. Sailors began probing for a safe way through its many dangers hundreds of years ago, almost as soon as they realised the world was round.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/welcome_to_the_new_arctic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/welcome_to_the_new_arctic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wall Street-climate change connection</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/the_wall_street_climate_change_connection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/the_wall_street_climate_change_connection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10306159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study exposes the role of the big banks in financing dirty coal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think “climate change” and the companies that come to mind are oil giants like Exxon Mobil or BP – not JP Morgan or Bank of America.</p><p>But a new study by Urgewald, a German environmental organization, establishes a strong link between large multinational banks and the coal industry, one of the biggest contributors to climate change.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.banktrack.org/download/bankrolling_climate_change/climatekillerbanks_final_0.pdf">study (.pdf)</a>, “Bankrolling Climate Change,” identifies the top 20 “climate killer” banks by the amount of financial support they give the coal industry. Number one is JP Morgan Chase, followed by Citi and Bank of America. That’s despite lofty rhetoric from these companies about their work to address climate change.</p><p>To learn more about the banks’ role in climate change, I spoke with Heffa Schuecking, the director of Urgewald and the principal author of the new study. She recently returned from a week at the U.N. climate talks in Durban, South Africa.</p><p><strong>What was the goal of embarking on this study?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/the_wall_street_climate_change_connection/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/the_wall_street_climate_change_connection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yawn: Worst year ever for greenhouse gases</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/yawn_worst_year_ever_for_greenhouse_gases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/yawn_worst_year_ever_for_greenhouse_gases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10292667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world sets a post-Industrial Revolution record for carbon dioxide emissions. And things are going to get worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's play a game. Let's just <em>suppose</em> that there is a direct connection between the amount of greenhouse gases humans have been injecting into the earth's atmosphere since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and the astonishing run of <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2011/11/2011-a-year-of-extreme-weather-and-the-10th-hottest-on-record.html">extreme weather</a> that has afflicted the planet in the last two years. You know: the crazy tornado season, the devastating droughts, the disastrous floods. Let's throw in, for good measure, 2010's status as tied for the honor of hottest year in the historical record, and 2011's likely inclusion in the top 10 warmest years.</p><p>Then let's mull over this news: According to the scientists at the <a href="http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/">Global Carbon Project,</a> in 2010, global emissions of carbon dioxide set a post-Industrial Revolution record.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/05/science/earth/record-jump-in-emissions-in-2010-study-finds.html">From the New York Times:</a></p><blockquote><p>Emissions rose 5.9 percent in 2010... the increase, a half-billion extra tons of carbon pumped into the air, was almost certainly the largest absolute jump in any year since the Industrial Revolution, and the largest percentage increase since 2003.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/yawn_worst_year_ever_for_greenhouse_gases/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/yawn_worst_year_ever_for_greenhouse_gases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extreme droughts: The new normal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/extreme_droughts_the_new_normal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/extreme_droughts_the_new_normal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10292143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Southwest had one of the driest years on record. The future will be plagued with even more devastation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider it a taste of the future: the fire, smoke, drought, dust and heat that have made life unpleasant, if not dangerous, from Louisiana to Los Angeles. New records tell the tale: <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/forest_and_brush_fires/index.html">biggest wildfire</a> ever recorded in Arizona (538,049 acres), <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/las-conchas-fire-near-los-alamos-largest-in-new-mexico-history/2011/07/01/AGcNXptH_blog.html">biggest fire</a> ever in New Mexico (156,600 acres), <a href="http://www.leanderfire.org/prevention/wildland-fire-information/">all-time worst fire year</a> in Texas history (3,697,000 acres).</p><p>The fires were a function of drought.  As of summer’s end, 2011 was the driest year in 117 years of record keeping for New Mexico, Texasand Louisiana, and the second driest for Oklahoma. Those fires also resulted from record heat.  It was the hottest summer <a href="http://www.weather.com/outlook/weather-news/news/articles/noaa-august-temps-precip-report_2011-09-08">ever recorded</a> for New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma and Louisiana, as well as the hottest August ever for those states, plus Arizona and Colorado.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/extreme_droughts_the_new_normal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/extreme_droughts_the_new_normal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two definitions of Newt Gingrich&#8217;s baggage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/two_definitions_of_newt_gingrichs_baggage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/two_definitions_of_newt_gingrichs_baggage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10272751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The surging GOP contender's disqualifying attributes look very different from the right and the left]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone agrees: Newt Gingrich may be polling strong now, but the man has a lot of "baggage." As our own Joan Walsh put it, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/newt_gingrich_his_baggage_has_baggage/singleton/">even his baggage has baggage.</a> And it's not just us loony leftists who think the former speaker is baggage-beset. Conservative professor John J. Pitney wrote of Newt Gingrich's baggage <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/284200/newts-baggage-john-j-pitney-jr">yesterday at the National Review's The Corner</a>. But there seem to be two very different definitions of what's <em>Newt's</em> baggage.</p><p>Here's what Joan Walsh described as his baggage: Newt Gingrich served his first wife with divorce papers while she was recovering from cancer surgery, he left the woman he left his first wife for for another mistress (he then converted to Catholicism in order to ask the church to annul his second marriage), he petulantly shut down the government in 1995 in part because he was upset that President Clinton sat him in the back of Air Force One, he gleefully led the Clinton impeachment drive while cheating on his (second) wife, and he had, for some reason, a $500,000 line of credit at fancy jeweler Tiffany and Co. And he blamed Susan Smith's horrific murder of her children, and the Columbine and Virginia Tech massacres, on Democrats. And <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/15/gingrich_food_stamp_president/">he says racist stuff.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/two_definitions_of_newt_gingrichs_baggage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/two_definitions_of_newt_gingrichs_baggage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has global warming become a campaign issue?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10222016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why blocking the Keystone pipeline could help Obama and denying climate change will hurt Romney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conventional wisdom has it that the next election will be fought exclusively on the topic of jobs. But President Obama’s <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/11/10/BUG71LTBLR.DTL">announcement</a> last week that he would postpone a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline until after the 2012 election, which may <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/change-pipeline-plan-could-present-problems-215701253.html">effectively kill</a> the project, makes it clear that other issues will weigh in -- and that, oddly enough, one of them might even be climate change.</p><p>The pipeline decision was a true upset. Everyone -- and I mean everyone who "knew" how these things work -- seemed certain that the president would approve it. The National Journal <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/insiders-obama-will-approve-keystone-xl-pipeline-this-year-20111011?page=1">runs a weekly poll</a> of “energy insiders” -- that is, all the key players in Washington. A month to the day before the Keystone XL postponement, this large cast of characters was “virtually unanimous” in guaranteeing that it would be approved by year’s end.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

