<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Goldman Sachs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/goldman_sachs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs says divided government probably best</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/goldman_sachs_says_divided_government_probably_best/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/goldman_sachs_says_divided_government_probably_best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12834901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High-priced global strategists support divided rule for deficit reduction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldman Sachs says if you want fiscal conservatism, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/goldman-sachs-re-electing-obama-and-a-gop-house-would-be-the-most-fiscally-conservative-outcome/2012/04/09/gIQATyiw5S_blog.html?wprss=rss_ezra-klein">vote to keep things exactly the way they are.</a> The (presumably very well compensated) analysts at Goldman's Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research team have released <a href="http://www.realclearmarkets.com/blog/0403_usdaily%5B1%5D.pdf">a note</a> (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/goldman-sachs-re-electing-obama-and-a-gop-house-would-be-the-most-fiscally-conservative-outcome/2012/04/09/gIQATyiw5S_blog.html?wprss=rss_ezra-klein">summarized by Suzy Khimm</a>) arguing that a divided Congress plus a Democrat in the White House equals "fiscal restraint." This may shock people who vote Republican under the impression that the party's primary goal is the reduction of the federal deficit as opposed to the elimination of the welfare state and the liberation of rich people from the shackles of redistributive taxation. But it's pretty obvious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/goldman_sachs_says_divided_government_probably_best/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/goldman_sachs_says_divided_government_probably_best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman&#8217;s never had &#8220;moral fiber&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/goldmans_never_had_moral_fiber/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/goldmans_never_had_moral_fiber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12683741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wall Street's always run on greed. Today's problems stem from systematic abuses of power]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Smith, a Goldman Sachs vice president, resigned his post Wednesday with a stinging public rebuke of the firm on the op-ed page of the New York Times — accusing it of no longer putting its clients before its own pecuniary goals.</p><p>But if Mr. Smith believes his experience at Goldman is something new, he doesn’t know history. In 1928, Goldman Sachs and Company created the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation, which promptly went on a speculative binge, luring innocent investors along the way. In the Great Crash of 1929, Goldman’s investors lost their shirts but Goldman kept its hefty fees.</p><p>If Mr. Smith believes such disregard of investors is unique to Goldman, he doesn’t know the rest of Wall Street. In the late 1920s, National City Bank, which eventually would become Citigroup, repackaged bad Latin American debt as new securities which it then sold to investors no less gullible than Goldman Sachs’s. After the Great Crash of 1929, National City’s top executives helped themselves to the bank’s remaining assets as interest-free loans while their investors and depositors were left with pieces of paper worth a tiny fraction of what they paid for them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/goldmans_never_had_moral_fiber/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/goldmans_never_had_moral_fiber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor Bloomberg personally cheers up Goldman Sachs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12683361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayor Mike Bloomberg visits the firm's HQ to tell bankers that they're wonderful people and everyone loves them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, accomplished table tennis player Greg Smith <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html?_r=3&amp;pagewanted=all">announced in a New York Times Op-Ed</a> that he was quitting his job at investment firm Goldman Sachs, because the firm's "culture" has become, at some point in the last 12 years, "toxic." Goldman Sachs responded with a spirited P.R. campaign in which it claimed that Smith was not actually a very important person to the firm, and a leaked memo from Lloyd Blankfein in which he argued that Goldman could not possibly be evil because a recent internal survey proved that Goldman employees enjoy working at Goldman.</p><p>Despite that very good spin, Goldman Sachs lost $2 billion worth of market value as its shares fell 3.4 in trading over the course of the day ("oh man, some guy says Goldman Sachs is evil? I HAD NO IDEA" -- the market). Thankfully, one hero stands ready to defend Goldman Sachs from public scorn: New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman on trial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/goldman_on_trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/goldman_on_trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12679751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reactions to an employee's damning editorial speak to the firm's power and the public rage over its moral lapses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldman Sachs is having a bad PR moment. Very bad. And you can bet that the investment banking giant is right now tapping its vast resources to counter the tide. The frenzy centers on an entry and an exit.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Entering: Jeffrey Verschleiser, former Bear Stearns executive and emblem of Wall Street excess and corruption, who will join Goldman as global head of mortgage trading.</p><p>Exiting: Greg Smith, executive director of Goldman Sachs’ U.S. equity derivatives business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, who has resigned in protest of the company’s culture of toxic greed and published his reasons in a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html">New York Times op-ed</a>.</p><p>This tale of coming and going, and the public reaction, speaks volumes of the power of Goldman Sachs and the public rage over its ethical lapses.</p><p>Which will speak louder? The answer will serve as a barometer to how far America has come in challenging a destructive financial system.</p><p><strong>The Devil’s Work</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/goldman_on_trial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/goldman_on_trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy defends the Volcker Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/occupy_defends_the_volcker_rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/occupy_defends_the_volcker_rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy the SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Volcker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12364081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Radical  protesters are reborn as policy analysts; they tell the SEC to curb Wall Street speculators]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Occupy the SEC march made its way past the Goldman Sachs building in New York City on Monday night I looked up from the near-constant tweeting I do at these events just in time to see a man in a top-shelf suit rush past us holding a bottle of champagne. I imagined him looking at the 100-plus crowd of activists disrupting the walk to his luxury mid-size, pouting indignantly, “You’re gonna do this to a guy in a $4,000 suit? Come on!”</p><p>Occupy the SEC held the march to celebrate the release of its 325-page comment letter to the SEC calling for it to strengthen – and then, more important, enforce – the Volcker Rule, which will go into effect on July 21, 2012. According to Aaron Bornstein, who helped organize the march, Occupy the SEC’s comment is about twice the size of the next longest letter, drafted by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a financial interest lobbying group.</p><p>The working group's detailed policy position gives lie to the common claim that the Occupy Wall Street movement is "well intentioned but misinformed." It shows there's room in the movement both for policy wonks and those chanting "anti-capitalista."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/occupy_defends_the_volcker_rule/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/occupy_defends_the_volcker_rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy San Francisco gets down to business</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/occupy_san_francisco_gets_down_to_business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/occupy_san_francisco_gets_down_to_business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12209051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a brief hibernation, a refocused movement takes aim at corporate America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAN FRANCISCO--Act II of the Occupy Wall Street movement, San Francisco version, kicked off on a rainy, blustery Friday in the heart of the city’s financial district. Targeting specific corporations like Wells Fargo and Bank of America and emphasizing real, tangible issues like home foreclosures, affordable health care and education as well as broader ones like the Supreme Court’s <em>Citizens United </em>decision, several hundred protesters – the exact number was impossible to estimate – fanned out across the city, snarling traffic, getting arrested, holding sidewalk teach-ins, and generally serving notice that after its brief winter hibernation, the Occupy movement was back and kicking.</p><p>Occupy’s first act, the Tent Phase, ended in early December, when city authorities raided its urban camp at Justin Herman Plaza near the Ferry Building. But even before the tents were removed, it had become clear that the movement needed both to develop new tactics and deepen its strategic vision.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/occupy_san_francisco_gets_down_to_business/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/occupy_san_francisco_gets_down_to_business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon Corporate Challenge: Goldman Sachs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/salon_corporate_challenge_goldman_sachs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/salon_corporate_challenge_goldman_sachs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Corporate Challenge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10367191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of Wall Street's big banks are equally guilty of bad citizenship. But some are more equal than others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the magisterial report released in April by the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, <a href="http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/_files/Financial_Crisis/FinancialCrisisReport.pdf">"Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse,"</a> a section recounting how Goldman Sachs profited off speculation in mortgage-backed securities -- at the expense of its own clients! -- closes with the following <em>j'accuse:</em></p><blockquote><p>Investment banks were the driving force behind the structured finance products that provided a steady stream of funding for lenders originating high risk, poor quality loans and that magnified risk throughout the U.S. financial system. The investment banks that engineered, sold, traded, and profited from mortgage related structured finance products were a major cause of the financial crisis.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/salon_corporate_challenge_goldman_sachs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/salon_corporate_challenge_goldman_sachs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for making a storm in the ports</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/the_case_for_making_a_storm_in_the_ports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/the_case_for_making_a_storm_in_the_ports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10354081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Salon writer claims it doesn't hurt the 1 percent. Here's how he's wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Occupy movement is sailing into murky waters. The coordinated <a href="http://westcoastportshutdown.org/">West Coast port shutdown</a> wasn’t just risky because of <a href="http://westcoastportshutdown.org/content/record-police-violence-during-d12-actions">police violence</a> against occupiers. Shutting down the ports of <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2016998204_apwaoccupyportswashington1stldwritethru.html">Longview</a>, Wash., <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nationnow/2011/12/portland-port-shutdown-occupy-seattle.html">Portland</a>, Ore., and <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/12/oakland-port-gets-back-to-work-after-occupy-protest.html">Oakland</a>, Calif., as the protesters did (along with more limited shut-downs in <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Occupy+Vancouver+rally+stops+trucks+from+reaching+port/5846898/story.html">Vancouver</a>, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/13/1044790/-Occupy-Seattles-shutdown-the-port-protest-at-Terminal-18-w-Photos">Seattle</a>, <a href="http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2011/12/12/2308606/bellingham-protesters-block-railroad.html">Bellingham</a>, Wash., <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/dec/12/arrests-made-occupy-protest-port/">San Diego</a>, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alex-campbell/occupiers-police-skirmish_b_1146335.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HP%2FBusiness+(Business+on+The+Huffington+Post)">Los Angeles</a>, and at a Walmart distribution center in <a href="http://www.coloradoan.com/article/20111212/LOVELAND0102/312120006">Colorado</a>), has had the result of taking some work hours away from port and shipping laborers who are in a very precarious situation. Actions in <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/12/crowd-protests-shipments-in-ventura-county.html">Ventura</a>, Calif., <a href="http://blog.thenewstribune.com/business/2011/12/12/occupy-movement-protest-peaceful-at-port-of-tacoma/">Tacoma</a>, Wash., <a href="http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/20-Occupy-Houston-protesters-arrested-2398468.php">Houston</a> and <a href="http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/b9d720d829d14ba08fc7ef296dc3240c/AK--Occupy-Ports-Anchorage/">Anchorage</a> targeted the ports as well, but for this reason did not actually attempt to shut them down.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/the_case_for_making_a_storm_in_the_ports/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/14/the_case_for_making_a_storm_in_the_ports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Busted for tweeting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/busted_for_tweeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/busted_for_tweeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10315986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police escalation in New York as my brother and 17 other people are arrested for observing an occupation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monday  morning marked yet another Day of Action for the Occupy Wall Street movement. Eight cities on the West Coast attempted to shut down ports. (The hashtag #PortShutdown on Twitter is moving a mile a minute.) In New York City, there was a solidarity march targeting Goldman Sachs that began at 7:30 a.m.  The march was well attended, peaceful and culminated in a street-theater Vampire Squid press conference held in front of the Goldman Sachs building.  Everyone was laughing and having a great time, and my brother John and I were there to tweet and take pictures.  As things calmed down after the fake press conference, word began to spread that protesters should reconvene at the Winter Garden, a nearby public atrium owned by Brookfield Properties (the same company that owns Zuccotti Park).</p><p>John and I walked over with a couple of other media people.  He covered the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/last_night_at_the_zuccotti_barricades/singleton/">Zuccotti Park eviction</a> for Salon, live-tweets most of the OWS events in the city, and has gotten to know many of the independent journalists who document the movement.  We arrived at the designated area, which felt like an enormous common space in a mall.  The main floor was decorated with Christmas trees, festive lights and public tables and chairs, with a wide marble staircase leading up to a balcony that overlooked the space.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/busted_for_tweeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/busted_for_tweeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Student loan debts crush an entire generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/student_loan_debts_crush_an_entire_generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/student_loan_debts_crush_an_entire_generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10128411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: Hyped like subprime mortgages, school loans now run to hundreds of billions with no relief in sight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[UPDATED]</strong> <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/college/story/2011-10-19/student-loan-debt/50818676/1">USA Today says</a> that at some point this year, student loan debt will exceed $1 trillion, surpassing even credit card debt. Felix Salmon says the number is closer to <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/10/19/fact-and-fiction-about-student-loans/">$550 billion.</a> Either way total student loan debt is rising as other debts have tailed off. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-student-debt-crisis-in-one-chart/2011/10/19/gIQADwJZxL_blog.html">Delinquency has increased, too</a>, since the height of the financial crisis.</p><p>It's a huge mess.</p><p>Some people have noticed that "student loan debt" comes up a lot among the Wall Street Occupiers and the members of the 99 percent movement. Often, older people, who either attended school when tuition was reasonable, or who didn't attend college at all in an era when a high school diploma was enough of a qualification for a stable, middle-class career, tend to think this is all the entitled whining of spoiled kids. They don't understand that these kids accepted a home mortgage worth of debt before they ever even had a regular income, based on phony promises, and that the debt is inescapable, regardless of life circumstances or ability to pay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/student_loan_debts_crush_an_entire_generation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/student_loan_debts_crush_an_entire_generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Italian protesters &#8220;storm&#8221; Goldman Sachs building</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/italian_protesters_storm_goldman_sachs_building/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/italian_protesters_storm_goldman_sachs_building/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10114008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Students briefly demonstrated in the corridors of the banking giant\'s Milan offices this afternoon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group of students forced their way into the Milan offices of Goldman Sachs earlier today as part of a protest in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/14/us-italy-goldman-protests-idUSTRE79D3ZM20111014">Reuters</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Students managed to break into the hall of the Goldman Sachs building in the heart of Milan's financial district, a few steps away from La Scala opera house, police said.</p>
<p>The protests were quickly dispersed by police and security was restored to the elegant building, though red graffiti was daubed on its walls expressing anger at Italy's Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and proclaiming "Give us money."</p></blockquote><p>The news comes fresh on the heels of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/occupy_wall_street_a_trans_atlantic_movement/singleton">reports</a> that protesters in cities across Europe plan to launch their own versions of the Occupy Wall Street movement on Saturday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/italian_protesters_storm_goldman_sachs_building/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/italian_protesters_storm_goldman_sachs_building/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs: Too big to prosecute</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/goldman_sachs_too_big_to_prosecute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/goldman_sachs_too_big_to_prosecute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/06/02/goldman_sachs_too_big_to_prosecute</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The investment bank gets some heat from the Manhattan district attorney's office, but Wall Street isn't worried]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Manhattan district attorney's office has subpoenaed Goldman Sachs, <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/goldman-receives-subpoena-over-financial-crisis/?hp">reports the New York Times,</a> seeking information relating to the investment bank's role in the financial crisis.</p><p>My initial response: Today is a good day to be Matt Taibbi.</p><p>Last June, Michael Hasting's stunning <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-runaway-general-20100622">Rolling Stone article on General Stanley McChrystal</a> ended that soldier's career. In December, one week after Jeff Goodell's blistering profile of <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/236336?RS_show_page=0">Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship</a> appeared in the same magazine, the coal baron resigned.</p><p>Is it too much to hope that Matt Taibbi could complete the trifecta? Last week Rolling Stone published Taibbi's latest frontal assault on his favorite vampire squid, <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511?print=true">"The People vs. Goldman Sachs."</a> Drawing heavily upon the 650-page report issued by Senator Carl Levin's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/52966055/WALL-STREET-AND-THE-FINANCIAL-CRISIS-Anatomy-of-a-Financial-Collapse">"Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse,"</a> Taibbi made a powerful case for prosecuting the investment bank for fraud and its executives for perjury.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/goldman_sachs_too_big_to_prosecute/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/goldman_sachs_too_big_to_prosecute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The revolving door keeps spinning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/former_senators_now_with_investment_banks_and_lobbying_firms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/former_senators_now_with_investment_banks_and_lobbying_firms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/31/former_senators_now_with_investment_banks_and_lobbying_firms</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How have the senators who retired in 2010 enriched themselves since leaving office? Let us count the ways]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judd Gregg doesn't have experience identifying growth in emerging markets or putting together complex financial models. But that didn&#8217;t keep him from landing a plum gig at the most talent-rich and fiercely competitive investment bank in the world. His life of public service now complete, the former three-term Republican senator from New Hampshire -- who had briefly agreed to serve as President Obama's first commerce secretary before backing out -- <a href="http://www2.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/press/press-releases/current/judd-gregg.html">joined Goldman Sachs</a> last week as an international advisor.</p><p>In his new role, Gregg will be responsible for such nebulous duties as "providing strategic advice to the firm and its clients, and assisting in business development initiatives across the global franchise."</p><p>Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein, whose firm was <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/04/26/92914/goldman-secretly-made-billions.html">upbraided by a Senate committee</a> only one month ago for perpetrating a massive fraud in the run-up to the financial crisis that some now believe <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511">warrants criminal charges</a>, said of Gregg, "His experience and insight will contribute significantly to our firm and our continuing focus on supporting economic growth."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/former_senators_now_with_investment_banks_and_lobbying_firms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/former_senators_now_with_investment_banks_and_lobbying_firms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalists spar over Goldman Sachs&#8217; potential criminal activity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/goldman_criminal_argument/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/goldman_criminal_argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/16/goldman_criminal_argument</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi and the Atlantic's Megan McArdle argue over whether there should be prosecutions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Taibbi argues forcefully in <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511?page=6">Rolling Stone</a> this month that, following indicting Senate hearings, executives at Goldman Sachs deserve to go on criminal trial for their part in the financial crisis.</p><p>On Sunday's "Your Money" on&#160;CNN, Taibbi pushes his point against Megan McArdle of the Atlantic Monthly. McArdle, described on <a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/matt-taibbi-and-megan-mcardle-square-over-off">CrooksAndLiars.com</a> as a "Wall Street apologist" essentially suggests that we shouldn't prosecute the bankers, because convictions are too difficult to get and that they probably meant well really. Taibbi is, unsurprisingly, unconvinced:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/goldman_criminal_argument/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/goldman_criminal_argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of vampire squids and their stadium schemes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/goldman_sachs_vanity_fair_ads_david_sirota/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/goldman_sachs_vanity_fair_ads_david_sirota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/22/goldman_sachs_vanity_fair_ads_david_sirota</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs wants credit for an economic recovery that it's actually hindering]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to media voyeurism and the economic insights it can provide, the ads in Vanity Fair rival Charlie Rose's television program as the best peep show of all. Between rip-and-sniff Dolce &amp; Gabbana pages and come-hither Gucci models, readers get to see not what the kings are selling the lowly serfs, but what the royal family is telling itself.</p><p>This is why I read Vanity Fair -- its ads provide a valuable glimpse into the palace. May's edition is no exception, thanks to Goldman Sachs -- aka the investment bank at the center of Wall Street's 2008 meltdown.</p><p>On Page 123 of the glossy mag, this very same bank presents itself as the savior of one of those Middle American cities whose averageness (and baseball bats) makes it synonymous with good ol' fashioned Americana: Louisville, Ky.</p><p>As Goldman's ad tells it, Louisville's major problem was its desperate need for a new arena. That's when the bank swooped in with a "financing strategy" to build the stadium, which then supposedly led to "a vibrant downtown scene, where new businesses are opening, existing businesses are expanding and local restaurants are hiring more employees."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/goldman_sachs_vanity_fair_ads_david_sirota/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/goldman_sachs_vanity_fair_ads_david_sirota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-Goldman director charged with insider trading</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/goldman_director_charged_with_insider_trading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/goldman_director_charged_with_insider_trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/01/Goldman_director_charged_with_insider_trading</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rajat Gupta, former Goldman board member, faces civil charges in "largest hedge fund insider-trading probe ever"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal regulators have charged a former Goldman Sachs board member with insider trading, saying he gave confidential information to the key figure in what prosecutors call the largest hedge fund insider-trading probe ever.</p><p>The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the civil charges against Rajat Gupta on Tuesday. The SEC said Gupta told Raj Rajaratnam, founder of the Galleon Group hedge fund, that Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway planned to invest $5 billion in Goldman before it was publicly announced at the height of the financial crisis.</p><p>Gupta also is charged with giving Rajaratnam confidential earnings information from Goldman and Procter &amp; Gamble. Gupta served on Goldman's board from 2006 until last May. He was a P&amp;G board member from 2007 until resigning Tuesday, after the charges were announced.</p><p>Gupta was an investor in some of the Galleon hedge funds when he passed the information along, and he had other business interests with Rajaratnam, the SEC said. Rajaratnam used the information from Gupta to illegally profit in hedge fund trades, the SEC said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/goldman_director_charged_with_insider_trading/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/goldman_director_charged_with_insider_trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A slap to the GOP&#8230; from Goldman Sachs?!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/goldman_sachs_budget_showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/goldman_sachs_budget_showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/02/23/goldman_sachs_budget_showdown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican spending bill will slow down U.S. economic growth, predicts the investment bank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-20100405">Vampire squid</a> to the rescue! Goldman Sachs has weighed in on the federal budget battle, and the investment bank that progressives love to despise is singing sweet music for opponents of severe Republican budget cuts.</p><p>
    <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0369c1bc-3f71-11e0-a1ba-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz1EobYuERK">The Financial Times reports:</a>
  </p><blockquote>
<p>The Republican plan to slash government spending by $61 billion in 2011 could reduce US economic growth by 1.5 to 2 percentage points in the second and third quarters of the year, a Goldman Sachs economist has warned.</p>
<p>The note from Alec Phillips, a forecaster based in Washington, was seized in the ongoing US budget fight by Democrats as validating their argument that the legislation approved by the Republican-led House of Representatives last Saturday would do significant damage to the US recovery.</p>
</blockquote><p>ABC News provides <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/02/goldman-sachs-house-spending-cuts-will-hurt-economic-growth.html">a lengthy excerpt</a> from the confidential Goldman report, including an interesting passage about the fiscal impact of a government shutdown.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/goldman_sachs_budget_showdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/goldman_sachs_budget_showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman earnings fall 53 percent in fourth quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/goldman_sachs_profits_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/goldman_sachs_profits_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/19/goldman_sachs_profits_down</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The investment giant paid out smaller bonuses but still suffered. Will their recent Facebook investment pay off?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldman Sachs' earnings fell 53 percent in the fourth quarter due to sharp declines in its investment banking businesses.</p><p>Goldman Sachs Group Inc. earned $2.23 billion after paying preferred dividends in the last three months of the year, down from $4.79 billion in the same period year earlier. On a per-share basis, the earnings came out to $3.79 per share versus $8.20 per share.</p><p>Goldman's stock fell 3 percent in pre-market trading Wednesday.</p><p>The company rewarded its employees with $15.38 billion in salaries and bonuses, or 39.3 percent of its annual revenue, for 2010. The amount was 5 percent lower than 2009.</p><p>Revenue fell 10 percent to $8.64 billion.</p><p>Underwriting fell 12 percent, while financial advisory services fell 7 percent on lower mergers and acquisitions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/goldman_sachs_profits_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/goldman_sachs_profits_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook: IPO in 2012 (or else)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/facebook_ipo_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/facebook_ipo_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2011/01/06/facebook_ipo_2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What last week's Goldman Sachs investment and an inquiry by the SEC mean for Facebook's future]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook could be forced to either launch an initial public offering or disclose its financial numbers as early as May 12, 2012. According to a Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703730704576066162770600234.html">report</a>, the company expects to breach the Securities and Exchange Commission's 500-shareholder limit within the year, requiring either a public offering or full disclosure of its financials.</p><p>This is a big deal for a few reasons.</p><p>First of all, Facebook is now a <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-valuation-tops-50-billion-dj-vu-all-over-again-2011-1">$50 billion company</a>. (If you're trying to wrap your recession-blown mind around that much money, try to imagine about 11 million pounds of cash in dollar bills. Or maybe that's not so helpful ...) While <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/01/facebook-valuation/comment-page-1/">some pundits</a> think this sounds expensive, others are hardly shocked. The Atlantic's Nicholas Jackson <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/01/a-50-billion-facebook-valuation-might-not-be-so-crazy/68823/">points out</a> that Facebook is now worth twice as much as Starbucks and with Goldman's support might follow the same path as Ralph Lauren, which <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/why-facebook-is-such-an-important-friend-for-goldman-sachs/">increased in value 16-fold</a> after the Wall Street behemoth invested.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/facebook_ipo_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/facebook_ipo_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs&#8217; Facebook ploy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/goldman_sachs_s_social_networking_play/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/goldman_sachs_s_social_networking_play/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/dan_gillmor/2011/01/03/goldman_sachs_s_social_networking_play</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The investment bank buys, big, into the social network -- and expands a shadow stock market]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/28816321/the_great_american_bubble_machine">"great vampire squid"</a> of finance, Goldman Sachs, has <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/02/goldman-invests-in-facebook-at-50-billion-valuation/">invested $450 million</a> in the emerging great vampire squid of cyberspace, Facebook. As the New York Times' DealBook reported, the deal is gives Goldman a leg up on the huge fees investment banks will get when the social-networking company eventually sells shares to the public. And as the Times and Wall Street Journal also <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/01/03/facebook-goldmans-low-risk-play/">report</a>, Goldman will also haul in huge fees from those clients who want to invest themselves.</p><p>Meanwhile, Facebook gets the capital to keep buying talent and startups, and to fuel its expansion in all kinds of other ways -- and it gets to sell stock in what amounts to a shadow stock market that's growing faster than regulators seem willing or able to understand, much less deal with.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/goldman_sachs_s_social_networking_play/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/goldman_sachs_s_social_networking_play/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

