<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The birth of the Google Translate era</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10105012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For most of human history, the notion of a "Star Trek"-style universal translator seemed as farfetched as a warp drive or American universal healthcare. Not anymore: In recent years, Google Translate has made automated translation as easy as copy-and-pasting text into a browser; you can now auto-translate entire news articles at the click of a button, and a host of mind-blowing translation apps have hit the iPhone. Word Lens, for example, allows you to point your camera at a piece of text and see it translated in real time on your phone. (Check out the app trailer <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5714462/translate-signs-and-menus-instantly-using-word-lens-crazy+amazing-iphone-app">here</a>).</p><p>It's a change that raises a number of bigger questions: Will automation completely replace human translation? Are we about to see the end of multilingualism? According to David Bellos, a professor of French and comparative literature at Princeton and Booker Prize-winning translator, that's not likely to happen anytime soon. In his new book, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/is-that-a-fish-in-your-ear-david-bellos/1102622504">"Is That a Fish in Your Ear?,"</a> about process and social meaning of translation, he persuasively argues that human translators are as crucial as ever. At a time when the world seems more globalized and small than ever, they play a central role helping us understand each other and bring art to a broader audience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/the_birth_of_the_google_translate_era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators clearly don&#8217;t understand Google</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//elections/2011/09/22/googlehearing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google chairman Eric Schmidt had an easy time of it during his much anticipated <a href="http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=3d9031b47812de2592c3baeba64d93cb">congressional testimony</a> before the Senate Judiciary Committee's antitrust subcommittee yesterday afternoon, in large part because senators on both sides of the aisle clearly have little grasp of the nuances of how Google works. Schmidt is likely counting that as a victory. But ignorance is not a guaranteed long-term strategy for Google.</p><p>Schmidt spent much of his time before the subcommittee trying to dispel the belief that Google's search dominance makes it, as Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee said with some hostility, "the biggest kingmaker on Earth." This was Google's come-to-Congress moment, and the Senate wasn't going to waste it. Five years ago, Google was just introducing to Washington its first full-time lobbying staffer. But Google is now a major player in Washington, and, as Lee put it, antitrust violations or no, it warranted attention. Initially Google Inc. offered to send the company's chief legal office David Drummond to answer its questions. The senators demanded either Schmidt or CEO Larry Page.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/googlehearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Google deserve the Microsoft treatment?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is what happens when one company controls <a href="http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-03-03/tech/29988796_1_google-tv-google-s-share-android-apps">40 percent</a> of the $30 billion U.S. online advertising market and <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2108991/August-2011-Search-Engine-Share-from-comScore-Hitwise">65 percent of online search.</a> The knives come out -- and they're sharp.</p><p>It's been a long year for Google. In February, European antitrust regulators <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368715,00.asp">launched an investigation</a> into whether Google was using its search results to privilege its own services over those of competitors. In June, the Federal Trade Commission started looking into whether Google's relationship with handset manufacturers using the Android operating system <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904823804576500544082214566.html?mod=rss_Technology">improperly promoted Google search.</a> In August, Texas's state attorney general <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368715,00.asp">joined the fun.</a> And on Wednesday, Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt <a href="http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=3d9031b47812de2592c3baeba64d93cb">will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee's</a> subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition, and Consumer Rights. The name of the hearing: "The Power of Google: Serving Consumers or Threatening Competition?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Santorum: Google wouldn&#8217;t be this mean to Joe Biden</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/20/santorum_mad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rick Santorum's last name is also a word for a byproduct of anal sex. That word was coined by activist and sex columnist Dan Savage, because Rick Santorum is a repulsive bigot and it was very funny. Years later, Rick Santorum is running for president, and he is mad that <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=santorum">Google accurately directs people searching for his name</a> to the sex definition. Google says they can't censor search results specifically to please one random politician, but Rick Santorum knows they are really <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0911/63952.html">just part of the conspiracy to embarrass Rick Santorum.</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Now, the Republican presidential candidate says he&#8217;s convinced Google could do something to remedy the issue, if the company wanted to.</p>
<p>&#8220;I suspect if something was up there like that about Joe Biden, they&#8217;d get rid of it,&#8221; Santorum said. &#8220;If you're a responsible business, you don't let things like that happen in your business that have an impact on the country.&#8221;</p>
<p>He continued: &#8220;To have a business allow that type of filth to be purveyed through their website or through their system is something that they say they can't handle but I suspect that's not true.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/santorum_mad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/us_tec_google_motorola_mobility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/us_tec_google_motorola_mobility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Phones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/15/us_tec_google_motorola_mobility</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google Inc. is buying cell phone maker Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. for $12.5 billion in cash. It's by far Google's biggest acquisition to date and a sign the online search leader is serious about expanding beyond its core Internet business.</p><p>Google will pay $40.00 per share, a 63 percent premium to Motorola's closing price on Friday.</p><p>Motorola Mobility was separated from the rest of Motorola in January. The company has remade itself as a maker of smartphones based on Google's Android software, but has struggled against Apple Inc. and Asian smartphone makers.</p><p>"Motorola Mobility's total commitment to Android has created a natural fit for our two companies," said Google CEO Larry Page in a statement. "Together, we will create amazing user experiences that supercharge the entire Android ecosystem for the benefit of consumers, partners and developers."</p><p>The acquisition has the approval of both companies' boards and is expected to close by the end of this year or early 2012. It dwarfs Google's previous biggest deal, the 2008 purchase of DoubleClick for $3.2 billion.</p><p>In premarket trading, shares of Motorola Mobility soared 60 percent, or $14.72, to $39.19. Shares of Google, meanwhile, fell $14.68, or 2.6 percent, to $549.95.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/us_tec_google_motorola_mobility/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Inc. is buying cell phone maker Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. for $12.5 billion in cash. It&#8217;s by far Google&#8217;s biggest acquisition to date and a sign the online search leader is serious about expanding beyond its core Internet business.</p><p>Google will pay $40.00 per share, a 63 percent premium to Motorola&#8217;s closing price on Friday.</p><p>Motorola Mobility was separated from the rest of Motorola in January. The company has remade itself as a maker of smartphones based on Google&#8217;s Android software, but has struggled against Apple Inc. and Asian smartphone makers.</p><p>&#8220;Motorola Mobility&#8217;s total commitment to Android has created a natural fit for our two companies,&#8221; said Google CEO Larry Page in a statement. &#8220;Together, we will create amazing user experiences that supercharge the entire Android ecosystem for the benefit of consumers, partners and developers.&#8221;</p><p>The acquisition has the approval of both companies&#8217; boards and is expected to close by the end of this year or early 2012. It dwarfs Google&#8217;s previous biggest deal, the 2008 purchase of DoubleClick for $3.2 billion.</p><p>In premarket trading, shares of Motorola Mobility soared 60 percent, or $14.72, to $39.19. Shares of Google, meanwhile, fell $14.68, or 2.6 percent, to $549.95.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/us_tec_google_motorola_mobility/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/us_tec_google_motorola_mobility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thanks, Google+, for my digital meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/16/tyranny_of_google_plus_digital_exhaustion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/16/tyranny_of_google_plus_digital_exhaustion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/07/16/tyranny_of_google_plus_digital_exhaustion</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am not cool. My husband is not cool. But like a pair of nags that has somehow managed to produce thoroughbreds, we have cool children. So cool, in fact, that the older one managed to secure for himself an invitation to Google+ -- Google's new social networking space and would-be Facebook killer -- on the first day it launched.</p><p>Because we have taught him to be compassionate and take pity on the uncool, he shared a Google+ invitation with me. The moment was the digital equivalent of his preschool days, when he'd arrive home to proudly gift me with a handmade object of unknown utility. "This is lovely," I'd say, my heart swelling as I considered the lump carefully, trying to figure if it looked more like a candy dish or a paper clip holder. "What's it for?"</p><p>When I ask the 17-year-old version of that boy what Google+ is for, he says -- texts, actually -- "its pretty sick, there're a lot of cool features thatll be awesome once more people get on. like better chatting and you can really control who sees what."</p><p>Alrighty then. Feeling positively hip, I head over, activate my invitation, upload a good-hair-day picture and type in a few simple words for my profile that seem to fit well with the spare, airy Google interface: "Writer, editor, public school advocate, parent, lover, friend, walker of dog." So far, so good.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/16/tyranny_of_google_plus_digital_exhaustion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not cool. My husband is not cool. But like a pair of nags that has somehow managed to produce thoroughbreds, we have cool children. So cool, in fact, that the older one managed to secure for himself an invitation to Google+ &#8212; Google&#8217;s new social networking space and would-be Facebook killer &#8212; on the first day it launched.</p><p>Because we have taught him to be compassionate and take pity on the uncool, he shared a Google+ invitation with me. The moment was the digital equivalent of his preschool days, when he&#8217;d arrive home to proudly gift me with a handmade object of unknown utility. &#8220;This is lovely,&#8221; I&#8217;d say, my heart swelling as I considered the lump carefully, trying to figure if it looked more like a candy dish or a paper clip holder. &#8220;What&#8217;s it for?&#8221;</p><p>When I ask the 17-year-old version of that boy what Google+ is for, he says &#8212; texts, actually &#8212; &#8220;its pretty sick, there&#8217;re a lot of cool features thatll be awesome once more people get on. like better chatting and you can really control who sees what.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/16/tyranny_of_google_plus_digital_exhaustion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/16/tyranny_of_google_plus_digital_exhaustion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s must-see viral videos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>1. Chupacabra on camera</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.theawl.com/2011/07/the-chupacabra-returns">Hard-hitting journalism from NBC</a>. Next up: Bigfoot... getting a pedicure??</p><p>
    <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0" height="245" id="msnbc8bfd49" width="420"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=43725330&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="launch=43725330&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" height="245" name="msnbc8bfd49" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>
  </p><p style="font-size: 11px; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: rgb(153, 153, 153); margin-top: 5px; background: none repeat scroll 0% 0% transparent; text-align: center; width: 420px;">
<p>
    <strong>2. Japanese roller coaster of death</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/">http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/viral_videos_roller_coasters_chupacabra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ shuts down invites &#8230; for now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, Google opened up its doors for users to try out Google+, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/social_media/?story=/tech/feature/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity">a new social networking platform</a> available to those smart enough to find the tiny red button on their homepage. Since Wednesday night, those with a Google+ invite were allowed to share the invitation with several of their friends. By this morning, all invitations had been put on hiatus, due to an "insane demand" and Google's "need to do this carefully, and in a controlled way," <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2011/06/google-invites-halted-due-to-insane-demand.html">according to social networking overseer Vic Gundotra</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Google+ does better than Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Way back when I joined Facebook I was under the impression that it was the social network where people play themselves. On Facebook, you were supposed to be "real." So I figured: OK, this is where I don't friend everyone indiscriminately; this is where I only connect with people I really know.</p><p>I stuck with that for a little while. But there were two big problems.</p><p>First, I was bombarded with friend requests from people I barely knew or didn't know at all. Why? It soon became clear that large numbers of people weren't approaching Facebook with the reality principle in mind. They were playing the usual online game of racking up big numbers to feel important. "Friend count" was the new "unique visitors."</p><p>Then Facebook started to get massive. And consultants and authors started giving us advice about how to use Facebook to brand ourselves. And marketing people began advocating that we use Facebook to sell stuff and, in fact, sell ourselves.</p><p>So which was Facebook: a new space for authentic communication between real people -- or a new arena for self-promotion?</p><p>I could probably have handled this existential dilemma. And I know it's one that a lot of people simply don't care about. It bugged me, but it was the other Facebook problem that made me not want to use the service at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back when I joined Facebook I was under the impression that it was the social network where people play themselves. On Facebook, you were supposed to be &#8220;real.&#8221; So I figured: OK, this is where I don&#8217;t friend everyone indiscriminately; this is where I only connect with people I really know.</p><p>I stuck with that for a little while. But there were two big problems.</p><p>First, I was bombarded with friend requests from people I barely knew or didn&#8217;t know at all. Why? It soon became clear that large numbers of people weren&#8217;t approaching Facebook with the reality principle in mind. They were playing the usual online game of racking up big numbers to feel important. &#8220;Friend count&#8221; was the new &#8220;unique visitors.&#8221;</p><p>Then Facebook started to get massive. And consultants and authors started giving us advice about how to use Facebook to brand ourselves. And marketing people began advocating that we use Facebook to sell stuff and, in fact, sell ourselves.</p><p>So which was Facebook: a new space for authentic communication between real people &#8212; or a new arena for self-promotion?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/facebook_google_opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the buzz on Google+?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/29/google_plus_buzz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After three failed attempts at starting its own social media tool (including the much-maligned and privacy-challenged <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/warning-google-buzz-has-a-huge-privacy-flaw-2010-2">Google Buzz</a>), Google has launched one more, ambitious effort to steal Facebook's thunder: Google+. The new service, now in test trials and available to a limited number of Google users, boasts some intriguing features that have the blogosphere a-buzzing, including Circles, which lets users choose exactly which groups of friends they want to communicate with; and Stream, an analogue to the Facebook "News Feed"; and Sparks, a social-ized Google News.&#160;Most notable, however, is that Google will bill the tool as an alternative for <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/google-facebook-privacy/">Facebook-wary consumers</a> who worry about that network's use of personal data.&#160;</p><p>Opinions on the service run the gamut. Here's a look at key early reaction:</p><p>The New York Times' <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/technology/29google.html">Claire Cain Miller</a> notes that Google's difficulties in the realm of social media have already taken a toll on its status as "entry point" to the Internet, and wonders if Google+ can really help make up for lost time:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After three failed attempts at starting its own social media tool (including the much-maligned and privacy-challenged <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/warning-google-buzz-has-a-huge-privacy-flaw-2010-2">Google Buzz</a>), Google has launched one more, ambitious effort to steal Facebook&#8217;s thunder: Google+. The new service, now in test trials and available to a limited number of Google users, boasts some intriguing features that have the blogosphere a-buzzing, including Circles, which lets users choose exactly which groups of friends they want to communicate with; and Stream, an analogue to the Facebook &#8220;News Feed&#8221;; and Sparks, a social-ized Google News.&#160;Most notable, however, is that Google will bill the tool as an alternative for <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/06/google-facebook-privacy/">Facebook-wary consumers</a> who worry about that network&#8217;s use of personal data.&#160;</p><p>Opinions on the service run the gamut. Here&#8217;s a look at key early reaction:</p><p>The New York Times&#8217; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/technology/29google.html">Claire Cain Miller</a> notes that Google&#8217;s difficulties in the realm of social media have already taken a toll on its status as &#8220;entry point&#8221; to the Internet, and wonders if Google+ can really help make up for lost time:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/30/google_plus_buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC to issue subpoenas in Google antitrust probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/us_tec_google_antitrust_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/us_tec_google_antitrust_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/23/us_tec_google_antitrust_probe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A published report says federal regulators are preparing to issue subpoenas to Google and other companies as authorities gather information for a broad antitrust probe into the Internet search leader's business practices.</p><p>The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that the Federal Trade Commission will issue subpoenas "within days."</p><p>The FTC is looking into whether Google abuses its Internet search monopoly to extend its dominance into other online markets, such as mapping, comparison shopping and travel.  Rivals complain that Google Inc., which handles two out of every three Internet searches in the U.S., manipulates its results to steer users to its own sites and services and bury links to competitors.</p><p>Google and the Federal Trade Commission refused to comment Thursday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/us_tec_google_antitrust_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A published report says federal regulators are preparing to issue subpoenas to Google and other companies as authorities gather information for a broad antitrust probe into the Internet search leader&#8217;s business practices.</p><p>The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that the Federal Trade Commission will issue subpoenas &#8220;within days.&#8221;</p><p>The FTC is looking into whether Google abuses its Internet search monopoly to extend its dominance into other online markets, such as mapping, comparison shopping and travel.  Rivals complain that Google Inc., which handles two out of every three Internet searches in the U.S., manipulates its results to steer users to its own sites and services and bury links to competitors.</p><p>Google and the Federal Trade Commission refused to comment Thursday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/us_tec_google_antitrust_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/us_tec_google_antitrust_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Library, Google, in deal to digitize books</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/eu_britain_google_library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/eu_britain_google_library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries and librarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/2011/06/20/eu_britain_google_library</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google has struck a deal with the British Library to make thousands of historic books available online.</p><p>The deal, announced Monday, will let Internet users read, search and copy 250,000 texts published between 1700 and 1870.</p><p>The deal applies to works in the library's collection that are no longer covered by copyright restrictions.</p><p>Google has similar deals with libraries around the world. Its plan to put millions of copyrighted titles online has been opposed by the publishing industry and is the subject of a legal battle in the United States.</p><p>The British Library has a collection of 14 million books and almost 1 million periodicals.</p><p>Last year it announced plans to digitize up to 40 million pages of newspapers dating back three and a half centuries.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/eu_britain_google_library/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has struck a deal with the British Library to make thousands of historic books available online.</p><p>The deal, announced Monday, will let Internet users read, search and copy 250,000 texts published between 1700 and 1870.</p><p>The deal applies to works in the library&#8217;s collection that are no longer covered by copyright restrictions.</p><p>Google has similar deals with libraries around the world. Its plan to put millions of copyrighted titles online has been opposed by the publishing industry and is the subject of a legal battle in the United States.</p><p>The British Library has a collection of 14 million books and almost 1 million periodicals.</p><p>Last year it announced plans to digitize up to 40 million pages of newspapers dating back three and a half centuries.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/eu_britain_google_library/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/eu_britain_google_library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Pawlenty&#8217;s ridiculous &#8220;Google Test&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Google it" works as an antidote to most of modern life's quandaries. So Republican presidential hopeful Tim Pawlenty apparently decided, why not apply it to government spending? The Minnesota governor is set to give a major economic address in Chicago, where he will unveil what he is calling "The Google Test."</p><p>"If you can find a good service on the Internet, then the federal government probably doesn't need to be doing it," Pawlenty will say, according to his prepared remarks.</p><p>As <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/06/07/the_google_test.html">Taegan Goddard's Political Wire</a> notes, the Google Test is just a rehashing of former Indianapolis Mayor Stephen Goldsmith's "Yellow Pages Test," which suggested that if the phone book listed three companies that provide a certain service, the city probably should not be in that business.</p><p>Of course, expanding Goldsmith's test to the vast expanses of Google is insane -- most of all because you can find pretty much any service on Google. Granted, Pawlenty's proposed test is probably just meme-ready gimmick speak. But let's take him at his word and see what federal programs and services we could do away with, thanks to the Google Test.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/">http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/pawlenty_google_test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government says no official email accounts have been hacked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_google_china_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_google_china_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/02/us_google_china_us</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The FBI is investigating allegations that computer hackers in China broke into Google's email system, but no official government email accounts have been compromised, the Obama administration said Thursday.</p><p>"These allegations are very serious," Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told reporters. "We take them seriously. We are looking into them."</p><p>She had no comment on reports of China's involvement.</p><p>Google said Wednesday that personal Gmail accounts of several hundred people, including senior U.S. government officials, military personnel and political activists, had been exposed. Google traced the origin of the attacks to Jinan, China, the home city of a military vocational school whose computers were linked to a more sophisticated assault on Google's systems 17 months ago. The two attacks are not believed to be linked.</p><p>White House spokesman Jay Carney said the Obama administration doesn't restrict government employees from using personal Gmail accounts, but does direct workers to use government email for official business. He had no comment on who in the administration may have been affected by the hacking.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_google_china_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FBI is investigating allegations that computer hackers in China broke into Google&#8217;s email system, but no official government email accounts have been compromised, the Obama administration said Thursday.</p><p>&#8220;These allegations are very serious,&#8221; Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told reporters. &#8220;We take them seriously. We are looking into them.&#8221;</p><p>She had no comment on reports of China&#8217;s involvement.</p><p>Google said Wednesday that personal Gmail accounts of several hundred people, including senior U.S. government officials, military personnel and political activists, had been exposed. Google traced the origin of the attacks to Jinan, China, the home city of a military vocational school whose computers were linked to a more sophisticated assault on Google&#8217;s systems 17 months ago. The two attacks are not believed to be linked.</p><p>White House spokesman Jay Carney said the Obama administration doesn&#8217;t restrict government employees from using personal Gmail accounts, but does direct workers to use government email for official business. He had no comment on who in the administration may have been affected by the hacking.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_google_china_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_google_china_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google says Chinese hackers broke into Gmail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_tec_google_hacking_attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_tec_google_hacking_attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/02/us_tec_google_hacking_attack</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google Inc. is blaming computer hackers in China for a high-tech ruse that broke into the personal Gmail accounts of several hundred people, including senior U.S. government officials, military personnel and political activists.</p><p>The breach announced Wednesday marks the second time in 17 months that Google has publicly identified China as the home base for a scheme aimed at hijacking information stored on Google's vast network of computers.</p><p>This round of attacks isn't believed to be tied to a more sophisticated assault originating from China in late 2009 and early last year. That intrusion went after some of Google's trade secrets and triggered a high-profile battle with China's Communist government over online censorship that has made it more difficult for the company to do business in the world's most populous country.</p><p>The latest duplicity appeared to rely on so-called "phishing" scams and other underhanded behavior that hackers frequently use to obtain passwords from people and websites that aren't vigilant about protecting the information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_tec_google_hacking_attack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Inc. is blaming computer hackers in China for a high-tech ruse that broke into the personal Gmail accounts of several hundred people, including senior U.S. government officials, military personnel and political activists.</p><p>The breach announced Wednesday marks the second time in 17 months that Google has publicly identified China as the home base for a scheme aimed at hijacking information stored on Google&#8217;s vast network of computers.</p><p>This round of attacks isn&#8217;t believed to be tied to a more sophisticated assault originating from China in late 2009 and early last year. That intrusion went after some of Google&#8217;s trade secrets and triggered a high-profile battle with China&#8217;s Communist government over online censorship that has made it more difficult for the company to do business in the world&#8217;s most populous country.</p><p>The latest duplicity appeared to rely on so-called &#8220;phishing&#8221; scams and other underhanded behavior that hackers frequently use to obtain passwords from people and websites that aren&#8217;t vigilant about protecting the information.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_tec_google_hacking_attack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/us_tec_google_hacking_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google launches trial of tap-to-pay phone system</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/us_google_tap_to_pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/us_google_tap_to_pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/26/us_google_tap_to_pay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google Inc. launched its bid to dominate a world where the smartphone has replaced the wallet as the container for credit cards, coupons and receipts.</p><p>It's a vision shared by others. The Internet search and advertising company faces tough competition from cellphone companies and Visa, which all want to play a central role in tying together phones, retailers and banks into a new payment system.</p><p>Google said Thursday that it's launching a trial of its payment system in San Francisco and New York in cooperation with MasterCard and Citibank. It is opening it up to consumers in the summer. It then plans to expand across the country.</p><p>There has been talk of smart payment systems for years. Google faces the same hurdles that have stifled previous trials. The new Google Wallet will initially work on only one smartphone, the Google Nexus S 4G carried by Sprint Nextel Corp. It will connect only to MasterCard PayPass terminals. There are more than 135,000 of those in U.S. stores and restaurants, but that's only a small fraction of the total number.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/us_google_tap_to_pay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Inc. launched its bid to dominate a world where the smartphone has replaced the wallet as the container for credit cards, coupons and receipts.</p><p>It&#8217;s a vision shared by others. The Internet search and advertising company faces tough competition from cellphone companies and Visa, which all want to play a central role in tying together phones, retailers and banks into a new payment system.</p><p>Google said Thursday that it&#8217;s launching a trial of its payment system in San Francisco and New York in cooperation with MasterCard and Citibank. It is opening it up to consumers in the summer. It then plans to expand across the country.</p><p>There has been talk of smart payment systems for years. Google faces the same hurdles that have stifled previous trials. The new Google Wallet will initially work on only one smartphone, the Google Nexus S 4G carried by Sprint Nextel Corp. It will connect only to MasterCard PayPass terminals. There are more than 135,000 of those in U.S. stores and restaurants, but that&#8217;s only a small fraction of the total number.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/us_google_tap_to_pay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/us_google_tap_to_pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primer: Facebook&#8217;s attempted Google smear</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The war between tech giants Facebook and Google intensified yesterday when Facebook got busted for hiring a top PR firm to seed negative stories about competitor Google's social media feature, Social Circle, to the press.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-12/facebook-busted-in-clumsy-smear-attempt-on-google/">The Daily Beast's Dan Lyons</a>, the social media leviathan hired PR firm Burson-Marsteller to pitch anti-Google stories to the media, "urging them to investigate claims that Google was invading people&#8217;s privacy. Burson even offered to help an influential blogger write a Google-bashing op-ed, which it promised it could place in outlets like The Washington Post, Politico, and The Huffington Post."</p><p>Here's how the story played out:</p><p>Chris Soghoian -- a blogger and PhD candidate who studies privacy and security -- received an email with a pitch. It read:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/">http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/13/facebook_google_smear_stunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Google stay on top?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/in_the_plex_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/in_the_plex_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/05/07/in_the_plex_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Google's unofficial motto is "Don't be evil" -- but can a company of such mythic proportions possibly keep its soul? That's the challenge now facing Google, which has transformed from a jumbled office over a bike shop in California to a behemoth that not only dominates the search engine field but also has a major presence in mobile phones, email, personal data collection and advertising among other fields. Can a company that rakes in several billion dollars annually and holds the key to almost all of the questions on the planet really resist growing a God complex? We all use Google -- but can we trust it?</p><p>To answer that question, Steven Levy turned to the people inside the company itself. As a journalist for Wired and Newsweek, Levy has been covering Google since 1999, and his book <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/In-The-Plex/Steven-Levy/e/9781416596585/?itm=1&amp;USRI=in+the+plex">"In the Plex"</a> offers a rare glimpse inside Googleplex headquarters, bringing to life the creative minds and quirky personalities of not only founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page but also the employees at one of the world's most sought-after workplaces -- the Googlers, as they're called. Eating at campus restaurants and sitting in on executive meetings, Levy narrates the history of a company that has managed to assimilate itself into the lives and language of Internet users across the globe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/in_the_plex_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s unofficial motto is &#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; &#8212; but can a company of such mythic proportions possibly keep its soul? That&#8217;s the challenge now facing Google, which has transformed from a jumbled office over a bike shop in California to a behemoth that not only dominates the search engine field but also has a major presence in mobile phones, email, personal data collection and advertising among other fields. Can a company that rakes in several billion dollars annually and holds the key to almost all of the questions on the planet really resist growing a God complex? We all use Google &#8212; but can we trust it?</p><p>To answer that question, Steven Levy turned to the people inside the company itself. As a journalist for Wired and Newsweek, Levy has been covering Google since 1999, and his book <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/In-The-Plex/Steven-Levy/e/9781416596585/?itm=1&amp;USRI=in+the+plex">&#8220;In the Plex&#8221;</a> offers a rare glimpse inside Googleplex headquarters, bringing to life the creative minds and quirky personalities of not only founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page but also the employees at one of the world&#8217;s most sought-after workplaces &#8212; the Googlers, as they&#8217;re called. Eating at campus restaurants and sitting in on executive meetings, Levy narrates the history of a company that has managed to assimilate itself into the lives and language of Internet users across the globe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/in_the_plex_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/07/in_the_plex_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome promises &#8220;It Gets Better&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"<a href="http://mashable.com/2011/05/04/google-chrome-it-gets-better/">The web is what you make of it</a>" is the message of a new prime time ad for Google Chrome. In partnership with the Dan Savage project for gay teens, "<a href="http://www.itgetsbetter.org/">It Gets Better</a>," the Google ad shows Dan talking on YouTube with the rally of Internet support that the initiative has brought in since its inception in September.</p><p>
    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7skPnJOZYdA" width="425"></iframe>
  </p><p>This isn't the first time Google has come out in support of "It Gets Better": In October, employees for the tech company made their own video for Savage's campaign.</p><p>
    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pYLs4NCgvNU" width="425"></iframe>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/">http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/04/google_chrome_it_gets_better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do we brand our evolving selves?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/beloved_brands_imprint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/beloved_brands_imprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/04/19/beloved_brands_imprint</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img class='wp-image-10070774' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/04/ID_imprint1.gif' /></a> As a young boy I was in constant search for an identity, always looking to fill the shoes of my missing father with the spirit of &#160;pro athlete or a rock/rap star. I wanted approval from my friends, from society, and most important, myself. I couldn't get this monetarily, so I searched for anything that could deflate the emptiness I carried around.</p><p>When I visit my hometown of Cleveland, Ohio, I often think about my childhood, stereotypes, our role in society, and why we become who we are. Until the age of 13 I grew up in a black neighborhood with a Jewish stepfather and a Catholic mother. Money was nil for the family; while we weren't necessarily struggling to eat dinner every night, we certainly did not take family vacations very far, eat out at restaurants a lot, or buy new back-to-school clothes. I was often embarrassed, always hesitant to bring a girlfriend home, and totally humiliated when my mother picked me up at school in her rusty, loud Chrysler LeBaron.</p><p>
    <img alt="" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/01.jpg" width="445" />
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/beloved_brands_imprint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img class='wp-image-10070774' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/04/ID_imprint1.gif' /></a> As a young boy I was in constant search for an identity, always looking to fill the shoes of my missing father with the spirit of &#160;pro athlete or a rock/rap star. I wanted approval from my friends, from society, and most important, myself. I couldn&#8217;t get this monetarily, so I searched for anything that could deflate the emptiness I carried around.</p><p>When I visit my hometown of Cleveland, Ohio, I often think about my childhood, stereotypes, our role in society, and why we become who we are. Until the age of 13 I grew up in a black neighborhood with a Jewish stepfather and a Catholic mother. Money was nil for the family; while we weren&#8217;t necessarily struggling to eat dinner every night, we certainly did not take family vacations very far, eat out at restaurants a lot, or buy new back-to-school clothes. I was often embarrassed, always hesitant to bring a girlfriend home, and totally humiliated when my mother picked me up at school in her rusty, loud Chrysler LeBaron.</p><p>
    <img alt="" src="http://imprint.printmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/01.jpg" width="445" />
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/beloved_brands_imprint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/beloved_brands_imprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

