<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gop_2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Parks and Recreation&#8221;: TV&#8217;s most progressive show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NBC sitcom is just as ardent in its defense of government as it is fearless in its skewering of conservatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> NBC’s <em>PARKS AND RECREATION</em>, never shying from political controversy, examines current beltway tensions in ways one might expect from a more overtly political program. This season more than ever,<em> </em>the tendentious questions of American governance have become the show's lifeblood, its fictive small town of Pawnee, Indiana, struggling with political tribulations closely mirroring those on the national stage — and proposing some bold solutions.</p><p>The season’s first episode follows the lead character, Amy Poehler's Leslie Knope, to Washington DC, where she met real political figures such as Joe Biden (her hero), Olympia Snowe, Barbara Boxer, and John McCain. Recent episodes have been titled "Soda Tax" and "How a Bill Becomes a Law" and highlight the nitty-gritty — if comically histrionic — details about local politics. In addition, the show's constant use of innuendo surrounding current political events, reenactment of debates concerning economics and governance, and tongue-in-cheek references to the increasing conservatism of American politics have made <em>Parks and Rec</em> more a comedic primer in American politics than a primetime comedy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/is_parks_and_recreation_secretly_socialist_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious right architect dies at 72</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/howard_phillips_architect_of_the_religious_right_dies_at_72_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/howard_phillips_architect_of_the_religious_right_dies_at_72_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Falwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The born-again Christian and co-founder of the Moral Majority was a major power player in conservative politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Phillips, one of the main architects of the Moral Majority and, more generally, the American religious right, died Saturday at the age of 72. <a href="http://christiannews.net/2013/04/22/howard-phillips-founder-of-the-constitution-party-passes-into-eternity/">According to the Christian News Network</a>, he had been suffering from dementia.<br /> <a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" /></a></p><p>Phillips <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/julieingersoll/7056/howard_phillips__founding_father_of_religious_right__has_died/">had a long history in conservative and right-wing movements</a>, including three runs as a third-party presidential candidate. He sat on the board of Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) and worked on Barry Goldwater’s unsuccessful 1964 presidential campaign. He then went on to get involved in the administration of Richard Nixon, who appointed him head of the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/howard_phillips_architect_of_the_religious_right_dies_at_72_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/howard_phillips_architect_of_the_religious_right_dies_at_72_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP: Proudly xenophobic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_proudly_xenophobic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_proudly_xenophobic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Rand Paul to Lindsey Graham, the Boston bombings have brought out the absolute worst in the Republican Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The xenophobia has already begun.</p><p>Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky) in a <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/04/senators-tangle-on-boston-bombings-role-in-immigration-overhaul/">letter</a> to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid today urged him to reconsider immigration legislation because of the bombings in Boston. “The facts emerging in the Boston Marathon bombing have exposed a weakness in our current system,” Paul writes. “If we don’t use this debate as an opportunity to fix flaws in our current system, flaws made even more evident last week, then we will not be doing our jobs.”</p><p>Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), senior Republican senator on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is responsible for an immigration reform bill, is using much the same language – suggesting that the investigation of two alleged Boston attackers will “help shed light on the weaknesses of our system.”</p><p>Can we just get a grip? Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is a naturalized American citizen. He came to the United States when he was nine years old. He attended the public schools of Cambridge, Massachusetts, not far from where I lived.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_proudly_xenophobic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_proudly_xenophobic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s go-to economics study debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth in the Time of Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carmen Reinhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Rogoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that high public debt may not stifle economic growth as two popular economists have theorized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> In 2010, economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff released a paper, <a href="http://www.nber.org/papers/w15639.pdf">"Growth in a Time of Debt."</a> Their "main result is that...median growth rates for countries with public debt over 90 percent of GDP are roughly one percent lower than otherwise; average (mean) growth rates are several percent lower." Countries with debt-to-GDP ratios above 90 percent have a slightly negative average growth rate, in fact.</p><p>This has been one of <a href="http://www.reinhartandrogoff.com/related-research/growth-in-a-time-of-debt-featured-in">the most cited stats</a> in the public debate during the Great Recession. Paul Ryan's Path to Prosperity budget states their study "found conclusive empirical evidence that [debt] exceeding 90 percent of the economy has a significant negative effect on economic growth." The <em>Washington Post </em>editorial board takes it as an economic consensus view, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/debt-reduction-hawks-and-doves/2013/01/26/3089bd52-665a-11e2-93e1-475791032daf_story.html">stating that</a> "debt-to-GDP could keep rising — and stick dangerously near the 90 percent mark that economists regard as a threat to sustainable economic growth."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/gops_go_to_economics_study_debunked_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What country does the Tea Party represent?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/what_country_does_the_tea_party_represent_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/what_country_does_the_tea_party_represent_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Keller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princeton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans are no longer swayed by public opinion, imperiling the GOP and grinding government to a halt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> With an assist from some long-term demographic trends, House Republicans have redistricted, propagandized and <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/columns/against-the-grain/republicans-are-running-scared-from-each-other-20121205">policed</a> themselves into another country.</p><p>As a result, they have become unmoored from the political incentives that typically drive law-makers' decision-making process. Public opinion no longer sways them, and that is creating a potentially insurmountable problem for the party establishment's efforts to broaden the GOP's appeal beyond angry old white people.</p><p>House Republicans may care about the GOP's national fortunes in the abstract, but too many are impervious to what the public at large wants because of the nature of the districts they represent. At the same time, a steady stream of spin from the conservative media provides insulation from the realities of American politics, and deep-pocketed outside groups punish Republicans for any deviation from right-wing orthodoxy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/what_country_does_the_tea_party_represent_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/what_country_does_the_tea_party_represent_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP campaign chair&#8217;s surprising defense of Medicare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Walden has labeled the president's new budget plan a "shocking attack on seniors"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President’s offer to cut spending on Medicare and Social Security is confusing some conservatives.  In the past, they’ve of course labeled such cuts a sign of Seriousness but his budget caught them off balance.  And yes, that’s very weird because he’s had the Medicare cuts in earlier budgets and the Social Security cut (chained CPI) in his fiscal cliff offer to Boehner.</p><p>Anyway, initial responses ranged from the incoherent—”I don’t see this as fundamental entitlement reform as much as clarifying a statistic which does happen to save money” (Paul Ryan)—to the opportunistic “Let’s set aside our differences and come together on things we can agree on” (Eric Cantor saying let’s do CPI but not the higher tax revenues in the budget)—to the faux-outraged House GOP campaign chair Greg Walden who labeled the President’s budget a “shocking attack on seniors.”</p><p>It’s that last part where things got weird today.  As the WaPo <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">reports</a>, Boehner and Cantor are distancing themselves from Walden, since they want these cuts.  And the very conservative Club for Growth…</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kid Rock: I&#8217;m &#8220;embarrassed to be a Republican&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kid_rock_im_embarrassed_to_be_a_republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kid_rock_im_embarrassed_to_be_a_republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kid rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP laws are interfering with the conservative musician's concerts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musician Kid Rock may have rallied support for Mitt Romney in the 2012 campaign run, but lately he is at odds with Republicans. He recently <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/kid-rock-on-his-20-tour-and-dumbass-republicans-20130410">told Rolling Stone that</a> "Athletes and musicians make astronomical amounts of money."</p><p>"People get paid $100 million to throw a baseball! Shouldn't we all take less and pass some of that money onto others? Think about firefighters, teachers and policemen. We should celebrate people that are intellectually smart and trying to make this world a better place."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kid_rock_im_embarrassed_to_be_a_republican/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/kid_rock_im_embarrassed_to_be_a_republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP embraces big data</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/gop_embraces_big_data_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/gop_embraces_big_data_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teradata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The party may be teaming up with Wal-Mart's "data warehousing" company to better understand voter behaviors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> The Republicans have <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/RNC_Growth_Opportunity_Book_2013.pdf">admitted it</a>: They need to get serious about collecting and analyzing voter data.</p><p>Well, you can't get much more serious than talking to Teradata, the "data warehousing" company that helps Wal-Mart, Apple and eBay store massive amounts of information about the behavior of their customers.</p><div> <p>Teradata is just one of the major data outfits with which leading Republican strategists are talking in their <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/RNC_Growth_Opportunity_Book_2013.pdf">declared effort</a> to match Barack Obama's big data campaign tactics, according to one person with knowledge of the strategy discussions.</p> <p>The Republican National Committee would neither confirm nor deny talking with Teradata, but was emphatic that no deal is in place. Teradata also declined to comment. There's unlikely to be any final deals until the RNC appoints a chief technology officer, which it has pledged to do by May 1.</p> <p>But if Republican strategists are still shopping for formal partners, their goal is clear: a new, more open database that will make it easier for Republican candidates to share what they're learning about voters — and for the party to share voter information with technology developers in order to build apps for use in coming campaigns.</p> <p>"At lots of levels, for lots of reasons, there's a lot of people that we're talking to," Mike Shields, the RNC's new chief of staff, told ProPublica.</p> <p>Both Republicans and Democrats already have databases of basic information about every voter in the United States. But Obama's campaign made big strides in connecting data from different sources, like campaign donation records, consumer data and volunteer lists, in order to produce more detailed profiles of individual voters.</p> <p>The Democratic National Committee has also streamlined the way information flows between local volunteers and the national party, so that data about voters collected by many different campaigns — such as a Minnesota voter's stance on gay marriage or whom a Virginia voter supported in a state senate race — all<a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/in-minnesota-democratic-grandmas-feed-information-about-voters-into-a-party">ends up in the same database</a> in D.C.</p> <p>Republicans want to match these innovations — especially the flashy ones, like the Obama campaign's ability to <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-so-far-about-obamas-big-data-operation">link people's Facebook profiles</a> to their official voting records. They also want to use data to make predictions about individual voters, not only about how to influence their vote, but about how to maximize their potential political donations.</p> <p>This is where Teradata could certainly be useful. The company is not a data broker, an outfit that strictly sells information about consumers. (So, for instance, the GOP wouldn't be getting any of Apple or Wal-Mart's data.) Instead, Teradata helps companies organize their own data, so that they can pick out unexpected trends — for instance, that Wal-Mart shoppers stocking up for a hurricane often buy <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/14/business/yourmoney/14wal.html?_r=0">strawberry Pop-Tarts</a>.</p> <p>When working with Isle of Capri Casinos, Teradata built a system to combine information about <a href="http://www.teradata.com/resources.aspx?TaxonomyID=1614">customer gambling habits</a> with data from the company's hotels. The <a href="http://www.teradata.com/industry-expertise/gaming/">new system</a> sends an automatic alert to casino hosts whenever a "high-value guest" arrives at a hotel. It also tracks how different customers respond to coupons, emails, and special offers.</p> <p>This kind of detailed tracking has become ever more central to data-driven political campaigns. Almost every day, Obama's re-election campaign tested 12 to 18 different <a href="http://projects.propublica.org/emails/">email variations</a>, before sending out the best-performing fundraising email to its entire list — a testing strategy that sometimes earned the campaign <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-29/the-science-behind-those-obama-campaign-e-mails">an extra million dollars</a>, or more.</p> <p>The campaign also tracked individual responses to email blasts — storing information on whether someone had, for instance, signed a card wishing Michelle Obama a <a href="http://projects.propublica.org/emails/mailings/something-to-make-you-smile-on-mother-s-day">Happy Mother's Day</a>, and using that information when asking the same people to sign a <a href="http://projects.propublica.org/emails/mailings/add-your-name-to-barack-s-card">birthday card for Barack</a>.</p> <p>Obama's data team also generated <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-so-far-about-obamas-big-data-operation">individualized predictions</a> about voters. The team calculated, among other things, which people were most likely to be persuaded to support Obama based on a conversation about a certain policy issue — information that then allowed field organizers to be more strategic about the houses they visited and the phone calls they made.</p> <p>Working with a company like Teradata would only be a first step toward this kind of sophisticated data program. Obama's 2012 campaign considered using Teradata, but ended up going with Vertica, a Teradata competitor, paired with open-source software Hadoop, to organize and search through their huge quantities of data. But, as former Obama staffers point out, having masses of information doesn't do anything on its own: You have to use the data to ask the right questions.</p> <p>Wal-Mart famously used its database to ask what products customers tended to buy before hurricanes. The Obama campaign used its data to ask whether the voters it wanted to reach were watching the evening news — or other kinds of television shows altogether. The campaign used the television-watching data it acquired to figure out<a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/everything-we-know-so-far-about-obamas-big-data-operation">exactly what shows the voters </a>they wanted to reach were watching, all of which made for more cost-effective ad placements.</p> <p>The result? The Obama campaign bought more targeted ads, while spending <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/inside-obama-campaign-tech-operation">less per television spot</a> than the Romney campaign, according to data collected by Kantar Media's Campaign Media Analysis Group.</p> <p>The campaign also constantly adjusted its predictions — and checked on the big picture of the campaign — by connecting voter information with <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/508836/how-obama-used-big-data-to-rally-voters-part-1/">detailed polling data</a>.</p> <p>Shields, the RNC's new chief of staff, called the data developments "a space race" between the RNC and the Democratic National Committee.</p> <p>"They put up Sputnik, but there's no reason that we can't put a man on the moon, and leave them behind," he said.</p> <p>As well as hiring in-house data analysts, the RNC plans to make it easy for outside software developers to access the party's national database. The goal, Shields said, is to create a "vibrant marketplace" of digital tools and applications that developers can sell to Republican candidates — all based on the party's own voter data. Think about the apps that connect to your Facebook profile — but for politics.</p> <p>If the plan takes off, some of the GOP's closely-guarded voter data will soon be available in new ways. Obama's 2012 canvassing app, which anyone could download, included a map of the user's current location that displayed the first names, addresses, ages and genders of <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/is-your-neighbor-a-democrat-obama-has-an-app-for-that">nearby Democrats</a>.</p> <p>The RNC will still get to control which developers are allowed to access its data. But its plans for a more open data platform will require that the Republican establishment confront technical, legal and cultural hurdles.</p> <p>"[The RNC] is an organization that is trying to figure out where they sit with technology in general. They're going to have to make an investment in a big way, if they're going to go on with open development," Harper Reed, the Obama campaign's chief technology officer, told ProPublica.</p> <p>The hard part about opening up your data is trusting the users, Reed said — including the users you don't like. What happens if some Republican developers want to use Republican data to build a pro-choice app?</p> <p>"This would be a challenge for any organization, not just a political one," he said. "It sounds interesting. It sounds innovative. It's a challenge."</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/gop_embraces_big_data_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/gop_embraces_big_data_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are the culture wars really over?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Views on sex, drugs and religion still dictate public policy decisions more than we might like to think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a> Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in the latest<em> <a href="http://www.democracyjournal.org/28/of-freedom-and-fairness.php?page=all" target="_blank">Democracy</a></em>:</p><blockquote><p>In 1943, Allied forces achieved a hard-fought victory in the North African campaign, captured Sicily, and began to fight their way up the Italian peninsula. Victories in places such as El-Alamein, Salerno, and Anzio gave America some confidence that the Allies would ultimately prevail in Europe. That confidence allowed the American public to shift more of its attention to the Pacific Theater. Popular magazines such as <em>National Geographic</em> began to publish more maps and articles about the Pacific because Americans suddenly wanted to know a lot more about Saipan and Leyte Gulf.</p> <p>The same sort of shift is happening now for the left in America’s long-running culture war. From the 1980s until the birth of the Tea Party, most of the action was in the Social Theater, in which the religious right and the secular left waged an existential struggle for the soul of American society. Issues related to sexuality, drugs, religion, family life, and patriotism were particularly vexing, and many people over 40 can recall the names of battlefields such as Mapplethorpe, needle exchange, 2 Live Crew, and the flag-burning amendment. But the left won a smashing victory in the 2012 elections, including the first victories at the ballot box for gay marriage. These triumphs, combined with polling data showing the tolerant attitudes of younger voters, give the left confidence that it will ultimately prevail on most issues in the Social Theater. The power base of the religious right is older, white, rural Protestants, a group that immigration, demography, and urban renewal have consigned to play an ever-shrinking role in American presidential elections.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cutting Social Security is no grand bargain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/cutting_social_security_is_no_grand_bargain_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/cutting_social_security_is_no_grand_bargain_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government program isn't contributing to the budget deficit, so why is it on the negotiating table? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner, Speaker of the House, revealed why it’s politically naive for the President to offer up cuts in Social Security in the hope of getting Republicans to close some tax loopholes for the rich. “If the President believes these modest entitlement savings are needed to help shore up these programs, there’s no reason they should be held hostage for more tax hikes,” Boehner said in a <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/05/17616402-boehner-obama-holding-entitlement-reform-hostage-for-tax-hikes?lite">statement</a> released Friday.</p><p>House Majority Leader Eric Cantor agreed. He <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/republican-response-obama-budget-89680.html">said</a> on CNBC he didn’t understand “why we just don’t see the White House come forward and do the things that we agree on” such as cutting Social Security, without additional tax increases.</p><p>Get it? The Republican leadership is already salivating over the President’s proposed Social Security cut. They’ve been wanting to cut Social Security for years.</p><p>But they won’t agree to close tax loopholes for the rich.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/cutting_social_security_is_no_grand_bargain_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/cutting_social_security_is_no_grand_bargain_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals should fear Chris Christie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP all-star is far from a moderate -- he's a social progressive's worst nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin introduced his falsely named "budget repair bill." In doing so, he transformed himself from an obscure Midwestern governor to the personification of a nationally orchestrated, well-funded right-wing movement that was more – much more -- than just an attempt to balance the budget on the backs of public service workers. His plan, concocted in quite public collaboration with the Koch brothers, was to gut public sector collective bargaining rights altogether.<br /> <a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">The right had a new champion. Having weakened and nearly destroyed the private sector union movement in America over the last 30 years, it was time to home in on a new target: public sector unions and, in fact, the very idea that a fair society requires a robust public sphere. (Hint: This is true for the non-wealthy, less so for people who can buy their way into private schools, private beaches, private jets and so on.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reagan Revolution is over</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1980s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the GOP has failed to capitalize on nostalgia for the ex-president: The nation has changed and so has the party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the Onion's <a href="http://www.theonion.com/video/zombie-reagan-raised-from-grave-to-lead-gop,14385/?r44b=no">spoof</a> about Ronald Reagan being raised from the grave to lead today's Republican Party still remains one of the funniest political satires in recent memory is because it rings so true. With the GOP in such disarray, you get the sense that the only thing that unifies the conservative movement is a visceral hatred of America's first African-American president and a cultlike worship of the Gipper. You also get the sense that if Republican leaders could have, they would have done exactly what that Onion spoof suggested --  reanimate the corpse of Ronald Reagan and run him for president in 2012 -- and for good reason. According to a stunning <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/08/1980s-poll-nostalgic/2065095/">new national poll</a> released today by the National Geographic Channel, Reagan would have demolished Obama in a head-to-head match-up.</p><p>As the coverage of Margaret Thatcher's death this week reminds us, the 1980s still define us in so many ways. The National Geographic Channel poll, timed to the Sunday premiere of <a href="http://www.natgeotv.com/the80s">the channel's three-night "The '80s: The Decade That Made Us,"</a> is chock-full of revealing findings about why exactly that is.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/the_reagan_revolution_is_over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP congressmen challenge Beyoncé and Jay-Z&#8217;s visit to Cuba</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gop_congressmen_challenge_beyonce_and_jay_zs_visit_to_cuba/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gop_congressmen_challenge_beyonce_and_jay_zs_visit_to_cuba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two Republicans from Florida ask how a vacation was approved to a country where U.S. tourism is prohibited]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay-Z and Beyoncé were recently spotted in Cuba to celebrate their five-year wedding anniversary, and, like all things Jay-and-Beyoncé, it <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/07/beyonce-jayz-cuba-holiday-republicans">made headlines</a> around the world. But in the U.S., it's sparking controversy, as it conflicts with America's 53-year-long trade embargo that limits tourism.</p><p>Two congressmen from Florida, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, have raised this point in a letter to the Office of Foreign Assets Control, demanding to know the exact purpose of the celebrities' trip and how it was approved. The letter notes that under U.S. law "the licensing of financial transactions for 'tourist activities' in Cuba" are prohibited by law." According to OFAC, notes the letter, only Americans with a "full-time schedule of educational exchange activities that will result in meaningful interaction between the travelers and individuals in Cuba" are allowed to visit. "These restrictions are in place because the Cuban dictatorship is one of four U.S.-designated state sponsors of terrorism with one of the world’s most egregious human rights records," write Ros-Lehtinen and Diaz-Balart.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gop_congressmen_challenge_beyonce_and_jay_zs_visit_to_cuba/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gop_congressmen_challenge_beyonce_and_jay_zs_visit_to_cuba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Republican Party is officially broken</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/the_republican_party_is_officially_broken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/the_republican_party_is_officially_broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipartisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Ornstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington's problem isn't partisanship or a fatally flawed system. It's that one party is massively dysfunctional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American political system is not broken. What’s broken is the Republican Party. And it’s not clear how it will recover.</p><p><a href="http://electionlawblog.org/?p=48977">What’s wrong with American politics and what can be done about it</a> is the question that election law expert Rick Hasen sets for himself in a fascinating new paper. In particular, he asks whether American politics is so broken that the only cure is to chuck the Constitution and replace it with a parliamentary system or some other radical systemic reform.</p><p>Hasen lays out the well-known case of dysfunction (perhaps best set out in Tom Mann and Norm Ornstein’s recent "It’s Even Worse Than It Looks") and considers, but mostly rejects, three possible rejoinders: that gridlock is actually what voters want; that gridlock is to some extent an illusion, and the system is more productive than frustrated partisans believe; and that dysfunction is real but could be cured by less-drastic measures such as Senate reform and electoral reform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/the_republican_party_is_officially_broken/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/the_republican_party_is_officially_broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>16 of the NRA&#8217;s frightening police-state &#8220;solutions&#8221; for our schools</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Federation of Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Wayne LaPierre had his way, every student and school employee would be a possible suspect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> The NRA doesn’t just want to put armed teachers, armed guards and volunteer vigilantes in schools to prevent more school shootings. It wants to turn schools into veritable prisons, where security staff patrol and lockdown schools, and indentify and spy on problem students and employees, according to an NRA-sponsored <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/133630146/NRA-s-National-School-Shield-Report" target="_blank">report</a> that included model legislation to allow such measures.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/03/randi-weingarten-nra-school-safety-report_n_3007940.html" target="_blank">National Federation of Teachers</a> and well-known civil rights <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2013/4/3/nras_school_shield_call_for_armed" target="_blank">advocates</a> slammed the <a href="http://www.nraschoolshield.com/" target="_blank">report</a>, issued by former GOP congressman and Department of Homeland Security official  <a href="http://hutchinson-group.com/index.php?page=asa" target="_blank">Asa Hutchinson</a>. They said militarizing schools with more guns was not the answer to gun violence. Nor was putting more police into schools, particularly in communities of color. That only increases hostilities for students, not safe learning environments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/16_of_the_nras_frightening_police_state_solutions_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP thinks imitating BuzzFeed to raise money is WIN!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One crazy congressional campaign committee that is totally going to win the midterms with listicles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP is going to make its own BuzzFeed, apparently. <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/the-new-house-republican-web-strategy-just-add-buzzfeed-20130404">National Journal's Brian Fung "won the Internet" yesterday</a> with his report on the National Republican Congressional Committee's thrilling new website, which has a sidebar, and features lists.</p><p>The NRCC also hired 20 writers (the GOP will save publishing!) to create conservative versions of the soul-deadening crap BuzzFeed's list-generators are forced to compile. While it may sound like the aim is to appeal to a new demo -- kids who remember the '90s and who also believe that balancing the federal budget with deep domestic spending cuts will also somehow spur economic growth -- it's actually not quite that ambitious: The point is to boost traffic to the NRCC website, and therefore to increase donations to the NRCC. It appeared to be working, too, even before the entire liberal Internet <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/04/gops-pursuit-buzzfeed-style-memes-suicidal/63882/">stopped to point</a> and <a href="http://prospect.org/article/were-all-buzzfeed-now">laugh</a> at the notion of a "conservative BuzzFeed," giving the project a massive amount of attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s new digital strategy is BuzzFeed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/gops_new_digital_strategy_is_buzzfeed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/gops_new_digital_strategy_is_buzzfeed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Republican Congressional Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIFs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Republican Congressional Committee will now publish lists with cute animals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Republican Congressional Committee is going for Internet lols. The organization is relaunching its website, and aims to model it after Internet media giant BuzzFeed -- complete with animated gifs, cute animals, lists and all.</p><p>The site has already added "<a href="http://www.nrcc.org/2013/03/22/13-animals-that-are-really-bummed-about-obamacare/">13 Animals That Are Really Bummed on Obamacare's Third Birthday</a>" and<a href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151519817019474&amp;set=a.61029924473.66235.46093654473&amp;type=1&amp;permPage=1"> meme-like images on its Facebook page</a>, such as this one:<br /> [caption id="attachment_13261666" align="alignleft" width="600" caption=" "]<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/gops_new_digital_strategy_is_buzzfeed/64749_10151519817019474_620806233_n/" rel="attachment wp-att-13261666"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/64749_10151519817019474_620806233_n.jpg" alt="" title="64749_10151519817019474_620806233_n" class="size-full wp-image-13261666" height="600" width="600" /></a></p><p>"BuzzFeed's eating everyone's lunch," NRCC spokesman Gerrit Lansing told the National Journal. "They're making people want to read and be cognizant of politics in a different way."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/gops_new_digital_strategy_is_buzzfeed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/gops_new_digital_strategy_is_buzzfeed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reagan daughter: My dad would have backed gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/reagan_daughter_my_dad_would_have_backed_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/reagan_daughter_my_dad_would_have_backed_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patti Davis cites gay friends and small government bonafides to back her theory. Phyllis Schlafly is not impressed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the party faithful, Ronald Reagan is the gold standard in Republican agenda setting. And with "What Would Reagan Do?" serving as a GOP mantra (however superficially) during primary campaigns and on matters of governance large and small, a posthumous marriage equality endorsement from the Gipper could be big news for a party trying to find its footing on the issue.</p><p>Well, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis has a theory about where her dad would have stood on gay rights and same-sex marriage.</p><p>In an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/04/us/politics/reagan-daughter-says-hed-have-backed-gay-marriage.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">interview</a> with the New York Times on Thursday, Davis pointed to her father's belief in limited government, his Hollywood history and a lesbian couple -- Davis' "aunt and aunt" -- who were close family friends as reasons Reagan would have backed marriage equality: "I grew up in this era where your parents’ friends were all called aunt and uncle. And then I had an aunt and an aunt. We saw them on holidays and other times. We never talked about it, but I just understood that they were a couple."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/reagan_daughter_my_dad_would_have_backed_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/reagan_daughter_my_dad_would_have_backed_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga reportedly turned down $1 million offer to perform at RNC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report from the Examiner alleges that the GOP was interested in Pitbull and Dolly Parton, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/lady-gaga-turned-down-1-million-to-perform-at-rnc/article/2525899">Washington Examiner</a> reports that the GOP, a party whose stance towards gays <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">has been nothing if not fraught</a>, approached <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/lady-gaga-gay-rights">LGBTQ icon</a> Lady Gaga to perform at the Republican National Convention's Hispanic Leadership Network last August. Sourcing a lawsuit filed by GOP fundraiser American Action Network against production company Cater America LLC, the Examinar claims that Gaga was offered $1 million to perform. Dolly Parton and Pitbull were approached as well.</p><p>AAN's Pete Meachum told the Examiner that Cater America head Rob Jennings said, "See what it would take to get Gaga instead of Dolly."</p><p>From the Examiner:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Young issues second, slightly better apology for &#8220;wetbacks&#8221; comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/don_young_issues_second_slightly_better_apology_for_wetbacks_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/don_young_issues_second_slightly_better_apology_for_wetbacks_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial slurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sorry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13256118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Alaska Republican actually said "sorry" in a second statement, adding that he regrets the "insensitive term"  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republican Don Young apologized for a second time on Friday for using a racial slur to describe migrant farm workers. Earlier this week, Young told an Alaskan radio host that when he was a child, his father "used 50-60 wetbacks to pick tomatoes" on their California farm.</p><p>When news of Young's comment broke, Republican leaders (newly committed to having Latino voters and immigrants like them) issued strongly worded statements disavowing the remark. House Speaker John Boehner called Young's use of the word "offensive and beneath the dignity of the office he holds." Other House GOP leaders joined Boehner in his criticism, saying there was "no excuse" for Young's language and that it warranted "an immediate apology."</p><p>On Thursday, the 21-term congressman issued a statement explaining that he "used a term that was commonly used during my days growing up on a farm in central California." Young said that he that he "meant no disrespect," but did not apologize for the slur.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/don_young_issues_second_slightly_better_apology_for_wetbacks_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/don_young_issues_second_slightly_better_apology_for_wetbacks_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>