<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Obesity&#8217;s a crisis but we want our junk food</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans split on how much the government should do to promote healthy eating ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- We know obesity is a health crisis, or every new year wouldn't start with resolutions to eat better and get off the couch. But don't try taking away our junk food.</p><p>Americans blame too much screen time and cheap fast food for fueling the nation's fat epidemic, a poll finds, but they're split on how much the government should do to help.</p><p>Most draw the line at policies that would try to force healthier eating by limiting food choices, according to the poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.</p><p>A third of people say the government should be deeply involved in finding ways to curb obesity, while a similar proportion want it to play little or no role. The rest are somewhere in the middle.</p><p>Require more physical activity in school, or provide nutritional guidelines to help people make better choices? Sure, 8 in 10 support those steps. Make restaurants post calorie counts on their menus, as the Food and Drug Administration is poised to do? Some 70 percent think it's a good idea.</p><p>"That's a start," said Khadijah Al-Amin, 52, of Coatesville, Pa. "The fat content should be put up there in red letters, not just put up there. The same way they mark something that's poisonous, so when you see it, you absolutely know."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird news: White House must respond to petition to build a Death Star</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/weird_news_white_house_must_respond_to_petition_to_build_a_death_star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/weird_news_white_house_must_respond_to_petition_to_build_a_death_star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jedi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposal calls for its construction to begin in 2016]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of today, the White House will have to take the <a href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/secure-resources-and-funding-and-begin-construction-death-star-2016/wlfKzFkN">petition to build a Death Star</a> (somewhat) more seriously. According to the White House's policy, petitions that "reach 25,000 signatures within 30 days" require a response. The Death Star petition was opened Nov. 14, 2012 and passed 25,000 signatures today, just making the cut off.</p><p>If we do get our Death Star, then perhaps Americans will wage an intergalactic war with the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/weird_news_jedi_knights_most_popular_alternative_religion_in_britain/">hundreds of thousands of Jedi</a> still using the Force in England.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/weird_news_white_house_must_respond_to_petition_to_build_a_death_star/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/weird_news_white_house_must_respond_to_petition_to_build_a_death_star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Akin slams bailout, asks for bailout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lame duck congressman has mixed feelings about moochers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an email to supporters today, outgoing Rep. Todd "legitimate rape" Akin, R.-Mo., had some unkind words for moochers in Michigan:</p><blockquote><p>The so-called “leadership” of cash-strapped Detroit has a message for President Obama: We voted for you, so bail us out.</p> <p>It’s sad, but true. In fact, just this past week Detroit City Councilwoman JoAnn Watson was quoted as saying: “Our people in an overwhelming way supported the re-election of this president and there ought to be a quid pro quo and you ought to exercise leadership on that. Of course, not just that, but why not?"</p></blockquote><p>He then quotes Ronald Reagan on how dependency leads to dictatorship and then monarchy. And if you make it to the end of the email Akin has just one more thing to add:</p><blockquote><p>P.S. – We still have a little ground to make up on our campaign debt retirement. I would be incredibly appreciative if you could click here to donate $5 or more today.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/akin_slams_bail_out_asks_for_bail_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California paid a psychiatrist $822,000 last year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/california_paid_a_psychiatrist_822000_last_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/california_paid_a_psychiatrist_822000_last_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Golden State has some very highly paid employees, but that's not the whole story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who’s allowed to be greedy?</p><p>While progressives rail against CEOs' seven-, eight- and nine-figure pay packages, Republicans reliably attack unions and the far more meager salaries of public sector workers. Public vs. private sector pay is a <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-07-23/politics/35487789_1_federal-workers-federal-employees-studies">charged and unresolved partisan issue</a>, but a few state employees who abuse the system or get lucky can be a more potent talking point for conservatives than more fundamental problems in how states take in and spend money.</p><p>While workers in Michigan <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/koch_brothers_tea_party_cash_drives_michigan_right_to_work_bill/">fight</a> to maintain union protections, Bloomberg has a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-11/-822-000-worker-shows-california-leads-u-s-pay-giveaway.html">scathing piece</a> that illustrates how public sector unions in California are draining state coffers. While the piece, the first of a six-part series on state payrolls (Drool!), could provide plenty of fodder to Tea Party types, the takeaway is more complex than the usual left-right tug-of-war:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/california_paid_a_psychiatrist_822000_last_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/california_paid_a_psychiatrist_822000_last_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs truthers&#8217; latest myth: Government doing all the hiring</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative news sites say that 73 percent of new jobs are created by the government. That number is pure garbage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard the news? While us workaday job-creating CEOs are about to get hit by Obama’s tax hike on the wealthiest 2 percent, those fat-cat municipal sanitation workers and public schoolteachers are adding to their ranks at an alarming rate. According to the latest meme ricocheting around the conservative blogosphere and Fox News, almost three-quarters of the new jobs created in the past five months have been government jobs.</p><p>The figure, <a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/73-new-jobs-created-last-5-months-are-government">first reported Friday</a> by the social conservative news website CNS.com, has immediatly gained traction on the right. It hits all the right buttons of demonstrating out-of-control government spending while exposing the sham that is the supposedly improving economy. And it does it all in a nifty little eye-popping statistic: First there was the 1 percent, then the 53 percent, followed by the 47 percent, now we have the 73 percent. The one problem is that it's total baloney, but we'll get to that in a second.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would you take investing advice from an SEC commissioner?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/would_you_take_advice_from_an_sec_commissioner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/would_you_take_advice_from_an_sec_commissioner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't! It's a scam]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An email phishing scam employing the name of Securities and Exchange Commissioner Daniel M. Gallagher has reached critical mass, forcing the agency that regulates Wall Street to <a href="http://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/impersonator.htm">clarify its role</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The SEC does not endorse investment offers, assist in the purchase or sale of securities, or participate in money transfers.  SEC staff will not, for example, contact individuals by telephone or email for purposes of:</p> <ul> <ul> <li>seeking assistance with a fund transfer;</li> </ul> </ul> <ul> <ul> <li>forwarding investment offers to them;</li> </ul> </ul> <ul> <ul> <li>advising individuals that they own certain securities;</li> </ul> </ul> <ul> <ul> <li>telling investors that they are eligible to receive disbursements from an investor claims fund or class action settlement; or</li> <li>offering grants or other financial assistance (especially for an upfront fee).</li> </ul> </ul> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/would_you_take_advice_from_an_sec_commissioner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/would_you_take_advice_from_an_sec_commissioner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC to John McAfee: &#8220;Are you prepared to die?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/cnbc_to_john_mcafee_are_you_prepared_to_die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/cnbc_to_john_mcafee_are_you_prepared_to_die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McAfee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The eccentric anti-virus mogul remains in hiding as he is wanted for questioning in a murder in Belize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The former software executive (and possible <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2232777/John-McAfee-Antivirus-tycoon-dyed-hair-beard-escape-Belize-police.html">meth manufacturer</a>), who is wanted by the Belize government as a person of interest for the murder of American expat Gregory Faull, spoke today to CNBC's Brian Williams and Robert Frank via telephone.</p><p>Although the interview started out casually, it soon took a bizarre turn when McAfee defended himself against claims of eccentricity:</p><blockquote><p>FRANK: John, you're an unusual guy. You know, we see pictures of you with a lot of guns, the spikey hair, the tattoos. A lot has been made recently about the young girlfriends you've had there. You know, a report now that you've even played Russian Roulette with a bullet. Is that report true?</p> <p>MCAFEE: OK, well first of all, let's address the photos. When Wired magazine sent the photographer down, you've been in the press long enough to know that when a photographer says "Well let's take your shirt off. Why don't hold the shotgun?" well you simply do it. You have no clue what's happening. That's what I did. Do you think I run around shirtless carrying a shotgun on my property? That's utterly absurd. As for the Russian Roulette, absolutely. But it was not true Russian Roulette, if you read the story. Put a bullet in the chamber, put it to my head, clicked it dozens of times, walked outside fired into the sand, the bullet fired. My point was, life is not exactly what you see.</p></blockquote><p>McAfee also said that he will resist the Belize government "as long as I'm still breathing." Sullivan then asked McAfee, "Are you prepared to die?" McAfee responded, "Well obviously that's what I think will happen if I am detained, and that is certainly a possibility."</p><p>McAfee remains in hiding.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Watch the <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/49710825">full interview</a> below:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/RlsH7eXCEdg" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/cnbc_to_john_mcafee_are_you_prepared_to_die/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/cnbc_to_john_mcafee_are_you_prepared_to_die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putin fires defense minister in wake of scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/putin_fires_defense_minister_in_wake_of_scandal_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/putin_fires_defense_minister_in_wake_of_scandal_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although originally supported Anatoly Serdyukov, the Russian president replaced him on Tuesday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOSCOW (AP) -- Russian President Vladimir Putin fired the country's defense minister on Tuesday, two weeks after a criminal probe was opened into alleged fraud in the sell-off of military assets.</p><p>Anatoly Serdyukov has been widely unpopular in the ranks because of his reforms that radically cut the number of military officers and army units, but Putin had staunchly backed him in the past and his dismissal came as a surprise. Some observers say that Serdyukov's successor may take a less radical approach to the military reform.</p><p>Putin made the announcement in a meeting with Moscow regional governor Sergei Shoigu, whom he appointed as the new minister.</p><p>Putin's comments appeared to connect the decision to a probe announced by the country's top investigative agency last month into the sale of military assets, including real estate, at prices far below market value.</p><p>The Investigative Committee says the state suffered damages of 3 billion rubles ($95 million) in just a few cases reviewed.</p><p>Putin did not give specifics in his televised remarks, but said he made the decision "in order to create the necessary conditions for the objective investigation of all issues" regarding the situation in the Defense Ministry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/putin_fires_defense_minister_in_wake_of_scandal_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/putin_fires_defense_minister_in_wake_of_scandal_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s new dumb lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/mitts_new_dumb_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/mitts_new_dumb_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney puts words in Obama's mouth with his "secretary of business" attacks -- and sticks them in a TV ad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when Mitt Romney took an Obama quote out of context and then <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/we_wont_put_your_dog_on_the_roof/">built his national convention around it</a>? Well, this is worse.</p><p>Here’s the campaign's new attack line: Obama said something that shows how much he loves bureaucracy and doesn’t understand business. “[Obama] wants to create a new ‘secretary of business,’” vice-presidential nominee Paul Ryan <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/paul-ryan-hits-the-president-on-secretary-of-business/">said</a> on the stump in Colorado yesterday. “We already have a secretary of business. It’s actually called secretary of commerce. That’s what this agency does. Let me ask you a question: Can anybody name our current secretary of commerce? You know why? We don’t have one! It’s been vacant for over four months.”</p><p>"I don't think adding a new chair in his cabinet will help add millions of jobs on Main Street," Romney himself added in Virginia later in the day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/mitts_new_dumb_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/mitts_new_dumb_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve King didn&#8217;t build that</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party darling built his construction business with a lot of help from government contracts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a clear day in mid-August this year, Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, who faces one of the toughest reelection bids of his career, mounted a stage at the State Fair and recounted a story about how he had an epiphany, one day in the mid 1970s, when he was an indebted newlywed: “I came back home that day and I said ... Nobody's going to take care of us. Nobody's going to offer me that magnificent job. We’re going to have to earn it ... Three months later I started a business.” It’s a classic American story of self-reliance, and King added a uniquely Republican punch line: “<a href="http://youtu.be/U_bnJMR-mRI">And I didn’t realize that if I did that, I didn’t build that!</a>” This was, of course, a clumsy quip on the (taken-out-of-context) Obama quote that would become the theme of the Republican National Convention and a symbol of everything the GOP stood for -- building private industry without any help from the government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/steve_king_didnt_build_that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan family business benefits from government spending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/ryan_family_business_benefits_from_government_spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/ryan_family_business_benefits_from_government_spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice Presidential debate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businessweek illuminates lucrative government contracts that Ryan doesn't support (at least in theory)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the vice-presidential debate tonight, Paul Ryan is all but certain to say that the best government is a small government. Small government, the thinking goes, doesn't gum up the works of the great American opportunity engine. If you <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/play_salons_vp_debate_drinking_game_tonight/">take a drink</a> every time Ryan praises small government, be sure to have a designated driver.</p><p>Ryan is less likely to say that his family’s construction business, Ryan Central, has benefited from government largess that free market purists, like Ryan, don't support. Businessweek <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-11/ryan-s-family-firm-gains-from-government-spending-he-criticizes#p1">explored</a> some of the most attractive projects:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/ryan_family_business_benefits_from_government_spending/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/ryan_family_business_benefits_from_government_spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russia expels anti-Putin lawmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/russia_expels_anti_putin_lawmaker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/russia_expels_anti_putin_lawmaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13011473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russian politicians voted out a long-time parliament member for his increasingly critical beliefs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOSCOW (AP) -- Russia's parliament on Friday expelled a lawmaker who turned against President Vladimir Putin, paving the way for similar action against others who have joined the opposition movement in a clear sign that the Kremlin is intensifying its crackdown on political dissent.</p><p>The 293-150 vote to expel Gennady Gudkov from the State Duma also removes his immunity from prosecution, and his supporters fear he could face arrest. Gudkov, a KGB veteran like Putin who once represented the main Kremlin party in parliament, helped stage a series of street protests against Putin's rule last winter.</p><p>Gudkov called the vote "political revenge and extrajudicial repression," and described the accusations - that he was involved in a business in violation of parliament rules - as a sham.</p><p>The vote to expel Gudkov came a day before the first major opposition rally after a summer break, a Kremlin signal to the opposition that it will take an increasingly tough line against dissent. Gleb Pavlovsky, a former Kremlin political consultant, said it moved against Gudkov out of fear that his example might encourage other members of the ruling elite to join the opposition.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/russia_expels_anti_putin_lawmaker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/russia_expels_anti_putin_lawmaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul won&#8217;t believe Obama&#8217;s cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/rand_paul_cannot_fathom_that_govt_jobs_decreased_under_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/rand_paul_cannot_fathom_that_govt_jobs_decreased_under_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13006732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky senator has some preconceived notions to protect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Rand Paul believes that the size of the U.S. government has increased under President Obama. So when Paul Krugman explained on ABC's "This Week" that there have been significant cuts to government jobs under Obama, in fact <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/11/brookings-without-government-job-cuts-unemployment-would-be-at-7-1-percent/">more cuts </a>than any other sector in the past three years, Paul was just incredulous.</p><p>"The thing I don’t understand is that you’re arguing that the government sector is struggling," Paul said. "Are you arguing that there are fewer government employees under Obama than there were under Bush?"</p><p>"Of course. That’s a fact. That’s a tremendous fact," Krugman replied.</p><p>"No, the size of growth of government is enormous under President Obama," Paul returned.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KBoxhD4iWhk" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Via <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/09/09/816761/flabbergasted-rand-paul-learns-public-employment-decreased-under-obama/">ThinkProgress</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/rand_paul_cannot_fathom_that_govt_jobs_decreased_under_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/rand_paul_cannot_fathom_that_govt_jobs_decreased_under_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/09/biggest_story_you_missed_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/09/biggest_story_you_missed_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12977189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commision fined Google for ignoring users' privacy concerns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has agreed to pay a $22.5 million fine to the Federal Trade Commission -- the largest in history -- for placing tracking cookies that bypassed the privacy settings of Apple's Safari browser. The penalty comes just four months after Google had agreed in another settlement with the FTC  that it would not "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/google-settles-ftc-privacy-case-for-225-million-agencys-largest-penalty/2012/08/09/e048f6a2-e236-11e1-a25e-15067bb31849_blog.html">misrepresent its privacy policies to consumers.</a>"</p><p>“No matter how big or small," FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said, "all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place."</p><p>Google is facing additional privacy violation charges in America and Europe.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/09/biggest_story_you_missed_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/09/biggest_story_you_missed_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest story you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12974949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies are set to pay $8 billion to settle charges of ripping off the government. No CEOs have been charged]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, military contractors, banks, pharmaceutical companies and other corporations might end up spending more than $8 billion in settlements with the government, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/08/business/more-fraud-settlements-for-companies-but-rarely-individuals.html?_r=1&amp;hp">reports</a>. Though the lawsuits include accusations of overbilling, drug marketing, selling "dangerous and defective" equipment to the military, and price and security fraud, thus far no individual within the corporations involved has been held accountable.</p><p>The Justice Department does not rule out charging executives. However, a government enforcer official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told the Times that in many cases it's too expensive and difficult to gather the evidence needed to prosecute high-positioned individuals.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/biggest_story_you_missed_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything most people think about the budget is wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/29/wrestling_with_the_federal_budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/29/wrestling_with_the_federal_budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12966412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party is wrong. Defense spending and wars -- not foreign aid or government workers -- dominate the budget]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cold predawn darkness of Monday, February 13, 2012, Robert Friedlander walked into a Starbucks three blocks from the White House. As they had been instructed by e-mail the night before, a half dozen reporters were waiting for him—one each from Dow Jones, Bloomberg, Reuters, Associated Press, Politico, and the Washington Post. With no ceremony and not much conversation, the young White House budget office aide slipped each of them a CD in a plain, square white envelope. The contents: President Barack Obama’s budget for the coming fiscal year. “It’s embargoed until 11:15,” he said. Friedlander’s inside-the-Beltway shorthand meant the reporters had about five hours to scour the documents before publishing stories on newswires and websites. At 11:15 a.m., the president was to begin speaking about the budget at a northern Virginia community college.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/29/wrestling_with_the_federal_budget/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/29/wrestling_with_the_federal_budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramadan porn-block blitz</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/21/ramadan_porn_block_blitz_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/21/ramadan_porn_block_blitz_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12961478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indonesia's fundamentalist IT minister is back on the anti-porn crusade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you get when you allow an attention-seeking fundamentalist to head a massive nation's IT ministry?</p><p>A lot of anti-porn crusading.</p><p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a></p><p>Tifatul Sembiring, communications and information technology minister of Indonesia, hates porn.</p><p>He hates it so much that he told the Jakarta Globe two years ago that <a href="http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/home/tifatuls-war-on-porn-enlists-10-new-soldiers/393878">frequently checks porn sites on his mobile phone</a> to ensure they are adequately blocked.</p><p>He hates it so much that he likened an Indonesian pop star's appearance in a leaked sex video to the <a href="http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/06/19/tifatul-chided-linking-sex-tape-scandal-crucifixion.html">crucifixion of Jesus Christ.</a></p><p>But Tifatul especially hates porn during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan. For the second time in two years, Tifatul has vowed to purge Indonesia of online pornography during Ramadan. He told the Jakarta Post that the government is now on "high alert" to make Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim-majority nation, <a href="http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/07/19/nation-be-free-porn-ramadhan.html">"free of porn."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/21/ramadan_porn_block_blitz_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/21/ramadan_porn_block_blitz_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks nix &#8220;risky&#8221; loans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12959159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Banks won't help Obama rescue the underwater homeowners who, a few years ago, they were eager to rip off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's looking more and more like the banking industry might be better off spending the millions that it funnels to lobbyists on some straight-up public relations damage control. Lately, not a day goes by without another bomb dropping. Sometimes it is embarrassingly obvious -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/hsbcs_dark_side_adventures/">money laundering for Mexican drug cartels?!</a> Did HSBC really need to be <em>that</em> obvious? But usually it is a little more subtle.</p><p>For example, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-17/obama-home-refinancing-effort-hits-banks-risk-capacity-limits.html">Bloomberg published an interesting article today</a> detailing bankers' resistance to the White House effort to help underwater homeowners refinance their mortgages. Much to nearly everyone's surprise, the most recent revamping of the administration's homeowner rescue plan is actually showing some healthy signs of progress -- at least if you compare it to the woeful performance of the stillborn White House initiatives prior to the new rollout. Bloomberg reports that by May of this year as many homeowners had already taken advantage of the new rules to refinance their homes as did in all of 2011. A little late in the game to change perceptions that Obama hasn't been doing all he can for homeowners, but still, better late than never for the people who are finally getting some breathing room.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the age of non-profit city government</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/14/welcome_to_the_age_of_non_profit_city_government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/14/welcome_to_the_age_of_non_profit_city_government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next American City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12956719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can NGOs run cities?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue Mosey spends a lot of time telling stories. When I first met her, she breezed through two hours of narration about the behind-the-scenes practicalities of cultivating a vibrant center in the city of Detroit, a story she is clearly well-practiced at delivering to the many national journalists who come to her with questions. A few days after our meeting, I saw her again at Fourteen East, a Midtown café that opened one year ago after Mosey inspired the owner to host her new venture on Woodward Avenue, Detroit’s central corridor. Mosey was at the café to pose for photographs before meeting a potential funder for lunch, where her strategic storytelling was again called upon — this time, to inspire concrete commitments for the non-profit that Mosey leads, and which, in turn, is headlining the city’s revival.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/14/welcome_to_the_age_of_non_profit_city_government/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/14/welcome_to_the_age_of_non_profit_city_government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking the surface?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12956511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The housing market could be picking up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who hang around these here parts know that I maintain a solidly realistic view of the current economy, both here and abroad.  So if I post something upbeat, let’s be clear: I don’t think we’re out of the woods, I’m not anywhere near satisfied with the pace of job growth, GDP growth, wage and income growth, etc.</p><p>But I have noted some signs that the housing market just might be carving out a <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/stop-the-presses-some-maybe-kinda-sorta-pretty-good-news-from-the-housing-market/">bottom</a>.  And that said, I’ve also noted that any improvement in prices will help ameliorate one of our serious outstanding problems: negative equity in your home.  So, it was with great interest that I read this today, from CoreLogic:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>