<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Great Recession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/great_recession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Films in Progress: Detropia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/films_in_progress_detropia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/films_in_progress_detropia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detropia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films in Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12928573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar-nominated directors are seeking help to release their new film independently. Check out this exclusive clip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No city has experienced the highs and lows of capitalism like Detroit. So what does it mean to the country when the most epic of epicenters of American industrial might falls to its knees? And can it rise again? "Detropia" is a haunting portrait of a city on the brink of collapse, told by a chorus of weary but optimistic citizens who have no plans to join the hundreds of thousands who have already defected for easier corners of the country. "Detropia," which won the editing award at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival, will make its way into movie theaters this fall … with your help. Dissatisfied with the limitations of traditional distributors, award-winning filmmakers Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady have launched their first-ever <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/708986040/detropia-were-releasing-our-doc-independently">Kickstarter</a> campaign to raise distribution funds to take the film far and wide in the fall.</p><p><strong>More about the film</strong></p><p>Detroit’s story has encapsulated the iconic narrative of America over the last century — the Great Migration of African-Americans escaping Jim Crow, the rise of manufacturing and the middle class, the love affair with automobiles, the flowering of the American dream, and now the collapse of the economy and the fading American mythos.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/films_in_progress_detropia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/films_in_progress_detropia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Brooks, &#8220;structuralist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/david_brooks_says_welfare_state_is_unsustainable_buys_new_3_6_million_house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/david_brooks_says_welfare_state_is_unsustainable_buys_new_3_6_million_house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times moderate says the welfare state is unsustainable, and buys himself a new $4 million home]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Brooks is everything that's wrong with elite opinion in America. The president reads him and takes him seriously. That is why the opinions of venal faux "reasonable" clowns like Brooks matter. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/opinion/brooks-the-structural-revolution.html?pagewanted=all">Brooks today sums up</a> the new argument for not actually doing anything to alleviate worldwide unnecessary hardship: The problem is "structural," not "cyclical"!</p><p>Long Op-Ed short, Brooks says "cyclicalists" (unnamed) think we should deficit-spend our way to prosperity, because, according to Brooks, they believe that "the level of government spending is the main factor in determining how fast an economy grows." (No one actually believes this.) But according to Brooks, all of our problems are "structural," which is to say that the reason we have mass unemployment and debt and growing wealth disparity is because of "technological change" and crappy schools. And "special-interest deals" in the tax code.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/david_brooks_says_welfare_state_is_unsustainable_buys_new_3_6_million_house/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/david_brooks_says_welfare_state_is_unsustainable_buys_new_3_6_million_house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chomsky: &#8220;Jobs aren&#8217;t coming back&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/chomsky_jobs_arent_coming_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/chomsky_jobs_arent_coming_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wealth is concentrated with the 1 percent because America no longer makes things: Financiers just manipulate money]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Occupy movement has been an extremely exciting development. Unprecedented, in fact. There’s never been anything like it that I can think of.  If the bonds and associations it has established can be sustained through a long, dark period ahead -- because victory won’t come quickly -- it could prove a significant moment in American history.</p><p>The fact that the Occupy movement is unprecedented is quite appropriate. After all, it’s an unprecedented era and has been so since the 1970s, which marked a major turning point in American history. For centuries, since the country began, it had been a developing society, and not always in very pretty ways. That’s another story, but the general progress was toward wealth, industrialization, development and hope. There was a pretty constant expectation that it was going to go on like this. That was true even in very dark times.</p><p>I’m just old enough to remember the Great Depression. After the first few years, by the mid-1930s -- although the situation was objectively much harsher than it is today -- nevertheless, the spirit was quite different. There was a sense that “we’re gonna get out of it,” even among unemployed people, including a lot of my relatives, a sense that “it will get better.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/chomsky_jobs_arent_coming_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/chomsky_jobs_arent_coming_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>140</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No one went to jail, so why is Wall Street so mad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/no_one_went_to_jail_so_why_is_wall_street_so_mad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/no_one_went_to_jail_so_why_is_wall_street_so_mad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not prosecuting any of the parties responsible for the recession has just served to embolden them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Newsweek, Peter Boyer and Peter Schweizer <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/06/why-can-t-obama-bring-wall-street-to-justice.html">explore the question of President Obama's Justice Department's failure to press any major criminal charges against Wall Street.</a> We learn, distressingly, that "finance-fraud prosecutions by the Department of Justice are at 20-year lows." Ex-Countrywide whistle-blower Eileen Foster, to name one prominent critic of the Justice Department's inaction, is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/25/eileen-foster-countrywide-whistleblower_n_1453390.html">still urging the Justice Department to do <em>something</em> about her former colleagues,</a> but to no avail. What's holding them back?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/no_one_went_to_jail_so_why_is_wall_street_so_mad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/no_one_went_to_jail_so_why_is_wall_street_so_mad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My own private recession</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/my_own_private_recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/my_own_private_recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12911263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 28, I moved in with Mom. It's the classic hard-luck tale of my generation -- but the only person at fault is me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the hottest new trend of last two years, I moved in with my mother at age 28. Despite everything, she still showed me off to the ladies at bridge night, just like when I was a kid. “This economy,” the ladies said, shaking their heads at the shame of it. Yes, lucky me, the recession. I could hide among its victims, and no one suspected what I knew.</p><p>This was all my fault.</p><p>Great timing for my high school reunion. That one question to sum up my first 10 years of adulthood: “So, what have you been up to?”</p><p>“Oh, just living with Mom,” I said, throwing an ironic thumbs up. I shrugged. “You know, with this economy…” Not even a full sentence, it worked as an excuse without technically being a lie. They all nodded with sympathy as if something had happened to me, and not because of me.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/my_own_private_recession/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/my_own_private_recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s new working poor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/working_in_poverty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/working_in_poverty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this economy, having a job is no longer a guarantee against poverty ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, the U.S. Government announced that 7.2 percent of Americans in the labor force earn so little that they are living in poverty. Reuters noted that the percentage of the working poor is the highest in at least two decades. The rate was 7 percent in 2009, 5 percent in 1999, and 5.5 percent in 1987.</p><p>In "The Rich and the Rest of Us," we warn against letting positive stock market and job recovery reports blind us to the truth. The fact is it’s harder than ever for Americans to find work. And, for the working poor, simply having a job isn’t enough. With inflation and the cost of living steadily rising and good-wage jobs declining, it’s no wonder more and more hard-working Americans find themselves in poverty or one paycheck away from impoverishment.</p><p>The U.S. Census placed overall poverty numbers in the United States in 2010 at 15.1 percent of the population or 46.2 million. The working poor comprise 10.5 million of that number. According to government criteria, a single individual making an annual income of $10,830 and a family of four living off $22,400 per year qualify as “poor.” It’s a stunning reality that more than 10 million Americans with jobs meet the poverty criteria.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/working_in_poverty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/working_in_poverty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sympathy for the creative class</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/no_sympathy_for_the_creative_class/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/no_sympathy_for_the_creative_class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art in Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12890351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxpayers bail out Wall Street and Detroit. But there's no help, or Springsteen anthem, for struggling creatives ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They’re pampered, privileged, indulged – part of the “cultural elite.” They spend all their time smoking pot and sipping absinthe. To use a term that’s acquired currency lately, they’re <em>entitled</em>. And they’re not – after all – real Americans.</p><p>This what we hear about artists, architects, musicians, writers and others like them. And it’s part of the reason the struggles of the creative class in the 21st century – a period in which an economic crash, social shifts and technological change have put everyone from graphic artists to jazz musicians to book publishers out of work – has gone largely untold. Or been shrugged off.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/no_sympathy_for_the_creative_class/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/22/no_sympathy_for_the_creative_class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Journal reports: Things are bad out in Real America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/national_journal_reports_things_are_bad_out_in_real_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/national_journal_reports_things_are_bad_out_in_real_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12899881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crumbling of once-great institutions isn't to blame for middle-class decline and anger. Politicians are]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Fournier, the editor in chief of the National Journal, and reporter Sophie Quinton <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/features/restoration-calls/in-nothing-we-trust-20120419#.T5FnSxDbDj8.twitter">have a story on hard times in Muncie, Ind.,</a> as a microcosm of the failure of American institutions as a whole.</p><p>It's a good piece. It's even an "important" piece, in the sense that the cloistered elites who run the country could learn something of the reality of life out in the country at large if this piece makes it to their desks. D.C.-based news organizations should report from "the rest of America" more often, because in Washington mass foreclosures and double-digit unemployment are usually seen as abstract problems slightly less pressing than the fact that Social Security will, decades from now, pay out slightly more than it takes in. (Joe Klein, who is basically a buffoon, returned from his stunt "2010 road trip" sounding suddenly much less buffoonish. Getting outside the bubble is often instructive.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/national_journal_reports_things_are_bad_out_in_real_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/national_journal_reports_things_are_bad_out_in_real_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>180</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economy killers: Inequality and GOP ignorance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/economy_killers_inequality_and_gop_ignorance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/economy_killers_inequality_and_gop_ignorance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12848421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By failing Econ 101, Republican leaders failed the country and repeated the errors that caused the Great Depression]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America emerged from the Great Depression and the Second World War with a much more equal distribution of income than it had in the 1920s; our society became middle-class in a way it hadn’t been before. This new, more equal society persisted for 30 years. But then we began pulling apart, with huge income gains for those with already high incomes. As the Congressional Budget Office has documented, the 1 percent — the group implicitly singled out in the slogan “We are the 99 percent” — saw its real income nearly quadruple between 1979 and 2007, dwarfing the very modest gains of ordinary Americans. Other evidence shows that within the 1 percent, the richest 0.1 percent and the richest 0.01 percent saw even larger gains.</p><p>By 2007, America was about as unequal as it had been on the eve of the Great Depression — and sure enough, just after hitting this milestone, we plunged into the worst slump since the Depression. This probably wasn’t a coincidence, although economists are still working on trying to understand the linkages between inequality and vulnerability to economic crisis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/economy_killers_inequality_and_gop_ignorance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/economy_killers_inequality_and_gop_ignorance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The causes of the financial crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/the_causes_of_the_financial_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/the_causes_of_the_financial_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12807651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Wall Street insider explains how Greenspan contributed to the mortgage crisis and how to restore economic sanity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall Street money manager Barry Ritholtz diagnoses the ills of America’s political and economic system in a fizzing, irreverent analysis (with promised f-bombs thrown in).</p><p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a><strong>I originally thought we were going to be talking about Wall Street today. But I got the sense from some of your book choices that one of the biggest offenders wasn’t based on Wall Street at all, but on Constitution Avenue in Washington, D.C.</strong></p><p>When you get bit by a dog, you don’t just look at the dog, you have to look at the owner who is holding the leash. To me, a lot of the regulatory changes, and a lot of what the Federal Reserve did, stand on their own as a major factor. But if you’ve read David Hume, if you’ve studied the philosophy of causation, you have to look at what motivated those changes. I have these debates with friends. One group blames everything on big government; the other group blames everything on big corporations. The sad news is that there’s really no difference between the two: Big government and big corporations work hand-in-hand. If you want to know who is the puppet and who is the puppet master, it sure looks like Wall Street has been pulling the strings of Congress for many, many, many years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/the_causes_of_the_financial_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/the_causes_of_the_financial_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bigger recovery woe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_bigger_recovery_woe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_bigger_recovery_woe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12814511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1% is doing great. But the economy won't stabilize until regular consumers have money to start spending again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economy added only 120,000 jobs in March – down from the rate of more than 200,000 in each of the preceding three months. The rate of unemployment dropped from 8.3 to 8.2 percent mainly because fewer people were searching for jobs – and that rate depends on how many people are actively looking.</p><p>It’s way too early to conclude the jobs recovery is stalling, but there’s reason for concern.</p><p>Remember: Consumer spending is 70 percent of the economy. Employers won’t hire without enough sales to justify the additional hires. It’s up to consumers to make it worth their while.</p><p>But real spending (adjusted to remove price changes) this year hasn’t been going anywhere. It increased just .5 percent in February after an anemic .2 percent increase in January.</p><p>The reason consumers aren’t spending more is they don’t have the money. Personal income was up just .2 percent in February – barely enough to keep up with inflation. As a result, personal saving as a percent of disposable income tumbled to 3.7 percent in February from 4.3 percent in January.</p><p>Personal saving is now at its lowest level since March 2009.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_bigger_recovery_woe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/the_bigger_recovery_woe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The corporate job creator myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_corporate_job_creator_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_corporate_job_creator_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12803021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unregulated corporations don't put Americans back to work. They off-shore jobs, cut wages and lay people off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last four decades, U.S. corporations have been sinking our economy through the off-shoring of jobs, the squeezing of wages, and a magician’s hat full of bluffs and tricks designed to extort subsidies and sweetheart deals from local and state governments that often result in mass layoffs and empty treasuries.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>We keep hearing that corporations would put Americans back to work if they could just get rid of all those pesky encumbrances – things like taxes, safety regulations and unions. But what happens when we buy that line? The more we let the corporations run wild, the worse things get for the 99 percent and the scarcer the solid jobs seem to be.</p><p>Yet the U.S. Chamber of Commerce wants us to think that corporations – preferably unregulated! – are the patriotic job creators in our economy. They want us to think it so much that in 2009, after the financial crash, they launched a $100 million campaign, which, among other things, draped their Washington, DC building with an enormous banner proclaiming “Jobs: Brought to you by the free market system.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_corporate_job_creator_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_corporate_job_creator_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still a 1 percent recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/still_a_1_percent_recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/still_a_1_percent_recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12762881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As this rest of us struggle, America\'s wealthiest households are reaping big economic gains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luxury retailers are smiling. So are the owners of high-end restaurants, sellers of upscale cars, vacation planners, financial advisors and personal coaches. For them and their customers and clients the recession is over. The recovery is now full speed.</p><p>But the rest of America isn’t enjoying an recovery. It’s still sick. Many Americans remain in critical condition.</p><p>The Commerce Department reported Thursday that the economy grew at a 3 percent annual rate last quarter (far better than the measly 1.8 percent third quarter growth). Personal income also jumped. Americans raked in over $13 trillion, $3.3 billion more than previously thought.</p><p>Yet it’s almost a certainly that all the gains went to the top 10 percent, and the lion’s share to the top 1 percent. Over a third of the gains went to 15,600 super-rich households in the top one-tenth of one percent.</p><p>We don’t know this for sure because all the data aren’t in for 2011. But this is what happened in 2010, the most recent year for which we have reliable data, and there’s no reason to believe the trajectory changed in 2011 or that it will change this year.</p><p>In fact, recoveries are becoming more and more lopsided.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/still_a_1_percent_recovery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/still_a_1_percent_recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the 1 percent live</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/how_the_1_percent_live/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/how_the_1_percent_live/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Let Them Eat Cake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12714061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penthouse parking, a new Versailles, a bat mitzvah bash in Aspen. Salon's guide to the travails of the 1 percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the unemployment rate still sits above 8 percent, and <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/03/07/148171728/1-in-3-americans-is-having-a-hard-time-paying-medical-bills">one in three Americans</a> struggles to afford medical bills, even the filthiest of filthy rich presidential candidates is at least <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/09/romney-says-hes-part-of-the-middle-class/">pretending</a> to empathize with the average American. Granted, they sometimes slip up and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/mitt-romneys-worst-wealth-gaffes/2012/02/27/gIQAbOcKeR_blog.html">expose</a> just how wealthy they are -- but at least they are trying.</p><p>The same cannot be said of some of these candidates’ cronies in the 1 percent. Whether complaining about having to do their own dishes, or bragging about their car garages costing more than the average American makes in a lifetime, the 1 percenters are all but screaming "let them eat cake" from the ramparts. Here are 10 particularly egregious examples from the last few months.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/how_the_1_percent_live/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/how_the_1_percent_live/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give up your bank for Lent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/give_up_your_bank_for_lent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/give_up_your_bank_for_lent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12680841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Francisco churches are withdrawing parish funds from Wells Fargo to push a freeze on foreclosures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Growing up Protestant in a small town in upstate New York, the commemoration of Lent was not as major an event as it would be in, say, a Catholic household. We didn’t give up chocolate or gum or anything else for those 40 days between Ash Wednesday and Easter, nor did most of the grown-ups we knew forsake any of their particular pleasures or bad habits.</p><p>When I was 12, one night a week during Lent was spent in religious training before becoming a member of our church at a service on Maundy Thursday (what Catholics and many others call Holy Thursday, the day of The Last Supper). But baptism was a prerequisite for membership and I had not yet been christened in the Congregational Church we attended; neither had my parents or my younger brother and sister. So all five heathens were lined up in the living room one Monday evening, and our minister quickly did the deed with a glass of tap water. Then we had cake.</p><p>My other powerful memory of the Lenten season is weekly religious breakfasts on cold Wednesday mornings. I was in high school and it meant waking up even earlier than usual on frigid winter days and getting a ride to the parsonage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/give_up_your_bank_for_lent/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/give_up_your_bank_for_lent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What &#8220;other America&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/the_truth_about_the_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/the_truth_about_the_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12678371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more and more Americans slip out of the middle class, it's time to realize: There is no "culture of poverty"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been exactly 50 years since Americans, or at least the non-poor among them, “discovered” poverty, thanks to Michael Harrington’s engaging book "<a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9781451688764%26 ">The Other America</a>." If this discovery now seems a little overstated, like Columbus’s “discovery” of America, it was because the poor, according to Harrington, were so “hidden” and “invisible” that it took a crusading left-wing journalist to ferret them out.</p><p>Harrington’s book jolted a nation that then prided itself on its classlessness and even fretted about the spirit-sapping effects of “too much affluence.” He estimated that one quarter of the population lived in poverty -- inner-city blacks, Appalachian whites, farm workers and elderly Americans among them. We could no longer boast, as President Nixon had done in his <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitchen_Debate">“kitchen debate”</a> with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev in Moscow just three years earlier, about the splendors of American capitalism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/the_truth_about_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/the_truth_about_the_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond a &#8220;Buffet tax&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/beyond_a_buffet_tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/beyond_a_buffet_tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12671281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's enormous wealth gap is widening. It's time to add a surtax on the super rich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let Santorum and Romney duke it out for who will cut taxes on the wealthy the most and shred the public services everyone else depends on.</p><p>The rest of us ought to be having a serious discussion about a wealth tax. Because if you really want to know what’s happening to the American economy you need to look at household wealth — not just incomes.</p><p>The Fed just <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/z1.pdf" target="_blank">reported</a> that household wealth increased from October through December. That’s the first gain in three quarters.</p><p>Good news? Take closer look. The entire gain came from increases in stock prices. Those increases in stock values more than made up for continued losses in home values.</p><p>But the vast majority of Americans don’t have their wealth in the stock market. Over 90 percent of the nation’s financial assets – including stocks and pension-fund holdings – are owned by the richest 10 percent of Americans. The top 1 percent owns 38 percent.</p><p>Most Americans have their wealth in their homes – whose prices continue to drop. Housing prices are down by a third from their 2006 peak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/beyond_a_buffet_tax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/beyond_a_buffet_tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trials of a stay-at-home boyfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/trials_of_a_stay_at_home_boyfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/trials_of_a_stay_at_home_boyfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12660461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's hard being unemployed for six months. Even worse is when your girlfriend picks up the check at dinner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a stay-at-home boyfriend. This lifestyle was dictated by circumstances – not choice – but it's hard to deny it has benefits. Showers: optional. Getting dressed: optional. Human contact: optional.</p><p>Still, I squirm every time my girlfriend, Stephanie, and I go out to dinner and she reaches for the check. Sometimes I snag it from under her lingering fingertips and whip out my Visa – for which she pays the bill -- as if that's somehow less demeaning. Say what you will about modern times and gender roles in the 21stcentury, but there are still certain behaviors associated with manhood. Providing. Protecting. Being a stay-at-home boyfriend may look easy. But let’s say I’ve forsaken a certain amount of pride.</p><p>Last August I earned my master’s degree from Northwestern University. I have now been unemployed for six months. I realize now that life with a liberal arts degree is self-inflicted. It turns out that few job descriptions list a base understanding of semiotics or rote memorization of the oeuvre of Alfred Lord Tennyson under necessary Skills/Qualifications.</p><p>But give me a <em>Break, Break, Break</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/trials_of_a_stay_at_home_boyfriend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/trials_of_a_stay_at_home_boyfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kids today still screwed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/kids_today_still_screwed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/kids_today_still_screwed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Loan Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12670601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loan debt is growing, they're stuck in service jobs, and people keep telling them to go to North Dakota]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case anyone decided to "scam" themselves some free higher education by going to college and then declaring bankruptcy, Congress <a href="http://studentloanjustice.org/conprotpic.htm">decided in 1998</a> to make sure that student loan debt had no statute of limitations and could not be discharged except in the event of extreme (and effectively unprovable) hardship. Then tuition began skyrocketing, players like Goldman Sachs got into the student lending business, and middle-class job opportunities for people without college degrees disappeared. The result, naturally, has been extremely profitable for certain people (<a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/student_loan_debts_crush_an_entire_generation/">Lally Weymouth</a>) and basically awful for everyone else in America. Now, Eric Pianin is in Lally Weymouth's Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/student-loans-seen-as-potential-next-debt-bomb-for-us-economy/2012/03/05/gIQAM0iF4R_story.html">saying that student loan debt might be "the next debt bomb.</a>"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/kids_today_still_screwed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/kids_today_still_screwed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>201</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The president&#8217;s good news</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_presidents_good_news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_presidents_good_news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12664401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jobs report is a boon for Obama, but the economy won't fully recover until consumers start spending again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January’s 227,000 net new jobs – the third month in a row of job gains well in excess of 200,000 – is good news for President Obama and bad news for Mitt Romney.</p><p>Jobs are coming back fast enough to blunt Republican attacks against Obama on the economy and to rob Romney of the issue he’d prefer to be talking about in his primary battle against social conservatives in the GOP.</p><p>But jobs aren’t coming back fast enough to significantly reduce the nation’s backlog of 10 million jobs. That backlog consists of 5.3 million lost during the recession and another 4.7 million that needed to have been added just to keep up with the growth of the working-age population since the recession began.</p><p>If the American economy continues to produce jobs at the good rate it’s maintained over the last three months – averaging 245,000 per month – the backlog won’t be whittled down for another five years, long after Barack Obama finishes his second term if voters grant him another.</p><p>But whether even that good rate continues depends largely on whether consumer demand can be revived. Spending by American consumers is 70 percent of U.S. economic activity. But so far, spending is anemic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_presidents_good_news/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/the_presidents_good_news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

