<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Guantanamo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/guantanamo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama signs NDAA again, disappoints on Gitmo and civil liberties again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indefinite Detention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second year in a row, the president signs into law a bill he purports to have major problems with]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time last year, President Obama said that he had "serious reservations" about certain provisions of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. But he signed it anyway. This year, the same provisions over which he was so reserved remain in the 2013 version of the bill, along with a number of brand-new problematic amendments. The president threatened a veto on the new bill's prohibitions on closing Guantánamo Bay detention center. But he didn't veto; he signed the bill again on Thursday.</p><p>Once again, Obama expressed his misgivings in a <a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2013ndaa.stm_.rel_.pdf.pdf">signing statement</a>, but stressed that "the need to renew critical defense authorities and funding was too great" to reject the bill, which approved a $633 billion armed forces budget for the 2013 fiscal year. Also approved in the NDAA are controversial provisions that will likely make closing Guantánamo Bay detention center impossible in Obama's presidency, and provisions elsewhere in the act that allow for the indefinite military detention of U.S. citizens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/obama_signs_ndaa_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantanamo death was suicide, US finds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/guantanamo_death_was_suicide_us_finds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/guantanamo_death_was_suicide_us_finds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adnan Latif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adnan Latif took an overdose of psychiatric medication in September, Defense Department confirms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) -- An autopsy has found that a Guantanamo Bay prisoner who died in September committed suicide, a U.S. military official said Thursday.</p><p>Adnan Latif, who was found unconscious in his cell in a disciplinary wing of the prison at the U.S. base in Cuba, took an overdose of psychiatric medication, according to a senior Defense Department official.</p><p>The official said it had not yet been determined how Latif, who was from Yemen and had a history of mental illness and clashes with guards, managed to collect enough medication to kill himself. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the autopsy results have not yet been released and the case remains the subject of an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service.</p><p>The U.S. military does not intend to disclose the results of the autopsy or discuss the case in further detail until after Latif's remains are returned to his country, said Army Col. Greg Julian, a spokesman for the U.S. military's Miami-based Southern Command, which has jurisdiction over Guantanamo. The remains are at the Ramstein Air Base in Germany.</p><p>His death was the seventh suicide at the prison, where the U.S. now holds 166 men. The deaths of two other prisoners were determined to be from natural causes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/guantanamo_death_was_suicide_us_finds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/guantanamo_death_was_suicide_us_finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Gitmo betrayal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habeas corpus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detainees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13042380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008, detainee lawyers backed him, thinking he'd restore the rule of law. They feel they were hoodwinked]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly five years ago, Gary Isaac, a corporate lawyer at a prestigious Chicago law firm, drank deeply from candidate Sen. Barack Obama's rhetorical reservoir of hope and change. The change Isaac was most concerned about had to do with the operation, outside the rule of law, of the U.S. military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Isaac was deeply involved, pro bono, in helping detainees challenge their detention in U.S. courts by asserting their rights under the ancient writ of habeas corpus, which requires that the state justify the detention of a person before a judge.</p><p>So convinced was Isaac that a President Obama would restore habeas for detainees that in February 2008 he published a blog called<a href="http://habeaslawyersforobama.blogspot.com/"> Habeas Lawyers for Obama</a>, composed of one impassioned post, signed by 132 habeas lawyers, and posted just before Super Tuesday in the Democratic primaries. It concluded:</p><blockquote><p>The writ of habeas corpus dates to the Magna Carta, and was enshrined by the Founders in our Constitution. The Administration's attack on habeas corpus rights is dangerous and wrong. America needs a President who will not triangulate this issue. We need a President who will restore the rule of law, demonstrate our commitment to human rights, and repair our reputation in the world community. Based on our work with him, we are convinced that Senator Obama can do this because he truly feels these issues "in his bones."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/habeas_lawyers_against_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suspected 9/11 mastermind calls U.S. worse killer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/suspected_911_mastermind_calls_us_worse_killer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/suspected_911_mastermind_calls_us_worse_killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[September 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khalid Sheik Mohammed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pretrial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13044400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Khalid Sheik Mohammed addressed a pretrial hearing at Guantanamo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the alleged 9/11 mastermind, told a Guantanamo courtroom yesterday that America is a bigger killer than he ever has been.</p><p>As Reuters <a href="http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/world-news/911-suspect-america-killed-more-people-than-hijackers-did_770318.html">reported</a>, during a pretrial hearing focused on security classification rules for evidence that will be used in his trial, the terror suspect used his address to lambast the United States:</p><p>"When the government feels sad for the death or the killing of 3,000 people who were killed on September 11, we also should feel sorry that the American government that was represented by (the chief prosecutor) and others have killed thousands of people, millions... Many can kill people under the name of national security, and to torture people under the name of national security, and to detain children under the name of national security, underage children," said Mohammed in Arabic through an English interpreter. "Your blood is not made out of gold and ours is made out of water. We are all human beings," he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/suspected_911_mastermind_calls_us_worse_killer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/suspected_911_mastermind_calls_us_worse_killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantanamo prisoner&#8217;s tragic letter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/16/guantanamo_prisoners_tragic_letter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/16/guantanamo_prisoners_tragic_letter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adnan Latif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13011976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adnan Latif suffered at the hands of the U.S. government in ways that most people can't begin to comprehend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adnan Latif was found dead in his cell on September 10, 2012, just a day before the eleventh anniversary of 9/11. He was 32. Latif, a Yemeni citizen, had been detained at Guantanamo Bay for over a decade, despite a 2010 court ruling that ordered the Obama administration to “take all necessary and appropriate diplomatic steps to facilitate <a href="http://witnesstorture.org/survivors/adnan-farhan-abdul-latif/">Latif's release forthwith,"</a> due to lack of evidence that he had committed any crime. He suffered at the hands of the US government in ways that most people can't begin to comprehend, and his death should be a reminder that the national shame that is Guantanamo Bay lives on and now enjoys bipartisan support.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/16/guantanamo_prisoners_tragic_letter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/16/guantanamo_prisoners_tragic_letter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: Terry Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_terry_jones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_terry_jones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13009565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the department of unhelpful suggestions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="245980222942478336"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="245980278215045120"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_terry_jones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_terry_jones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Obama&#8217;s foreign policy failed?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/has_obamas_foreign_policy_failed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/has_obamas_foreign_policy_failed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13002845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between infuriating China and trying the patience of European allies, his "smart power" has been anything but]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is a smart guy. So why has he spent the last four years executing such a dumb foreign policy? True, his reliance on “smart power” -- a euphemism for giving the Pentagon a stake in all things global -- has been a smart move politically at home.  It has largely prevented the Republicans from playing the national security card in this election year. But “smart power” has been a disaster for the world at large and, ultimately, for the United States itself.</p><p>Power was not always Obama’s strong suit. When he ran for president in 2008, he appeared to friend and foe alike as Mr. Softy. He wanted out of the war in Iraq. He was no fan of nuclear weapons. He favored carrots over sticks when approaching America’s adversaries.</p><p>His opponent in the Democratic primaries, Hillary Clinton, tried to turn this hesitation to use hard power into a sign of a man too inexperienced to be entrusted with the presidency. In 2007, when Obama offered to meet without preconditions with the leaders of Cuba, North Korea, and Iran, Clinton <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19933710/ns/politics-the_debates/t/clinton-obama-naive-foreign-policy/#.UCAhnFFa_ww" target="_blank">fired back</a> that such a policy was “irresponsible and frankly naïve.” In February 2008, she went further with a TV ad that asked voters who should answer the White House phone at 3 a.m. Obama, she implied, lacked the requisite body parts -- muscle, backbone, <em>cojones</em>-- to make the hard presidential decisions in a crisis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/has_obamas_foreign_policy_failed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/has_obamas_foreign_policy_failed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama GITMO myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/the_obama_gitmo_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/the_obama_gitmo_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12962334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New vindictive restrictions on detainees highlights the falsity of Obama defenders regarding closing the camp]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the 168 detainees at Guantanamo have been imprisoned by the U.S. Government for close to a decade without charges and with no end in sight to their captivity. Some <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/guantanamo_16/">now die at Guantanamo</a>, thousands of miles away from their homes and families, without ever having had the chance to contest accusations of guilt. During the Bush years, the plight of these detainees was a major source of political controversy, but under Obama, it is now almost entirely forgotten. On those rare occasions when it is raised, Obama defenders invoke a blatant myth to shield the President from blame: <em>he wanted and tried so very hard to end all of this, but Congress would not let him. </em>Especially now that we're in an Election Year, and in light of very recent developments, it's long overdue to document clearly how misleading that excuse is.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/the_obama_gitmo_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/23/the_obama_gitmo_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>177</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classified in Gitmo trials: Detainees’ every word</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/classified_in_gitmo_trials_detainees%e2%80%99_every_word_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/classified_in_gitmo_trials_detainees%e2%80%99_every_word_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12959888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Any and all statements" are "presumptively classified," according to a government order]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>Can the government automatically classify anything a Guantánamo detainee does or says?</p> <p>That’s the question posed by two challenges to a government order <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/396328-govt-motion-for-po-u-s-v-mohammad.html">declaring</a> “any and all statements” by the five detainees allegedly behind the 9/11 attacks “presumptively classified.” That includes their own accounts of their treatment, and even torture, at the hands of the U.S. government.</p> </div><p>The government made that argument this spring at the start of the military commission trials of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others. The government says the defendants’ accounts, if made public without review by a government authority, could reveal details of the CIA’s detention and interrogation efforts.</p><p>Of course, much information about the programs — including the torture of detainees — has long been public. The CIA’s so-called black-site prisons were acknowledged <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14689359/ns/us_news-security/t/bush-acknowledges-secret-cia-prisons/#.T5sEoqumja8">nearly six years ago by then-President Bush</a>. More details about the program were <a href="http://www.aclu.org/accountability/olc.html">released by President Obama</a> in 2009.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/classified_in_gitmo_trials_detainees%e2%80%99_every_word_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/classified_in_gitmo_trials_detainees%e2%80%99_every_word_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memorial for America&#8217;s conscience</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_for_americas_conscience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_for_americas_conscience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On this holiday, Americans should confront a grim fact about our country: We are torturers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facing the truth is hard to do, especially the truth about ourselves. So Americans have been sorely pressed to come to terms with the fact that after 9/11 our government began to torture people, and did so in defiance of domestic and international law. Most of us haven’t come to terms with what that meant, or means today, but we must reckon with torture, the torture done in our name, allegedly for our safety.</p><p>It's no secret such cruelty occurred; it’s just the truth we’d rather not think about. But Memorial Day is a good time to make the effort. Because if we really want to honor the Americans in uniform who gave their lives fighting for their country, we'll redouble our efforts to make sure we’re worthy of their sacrifice; we'll renew our commitment to the rule of law, for the rule of law is essential to any civilization worth dying for.</p><p>After 9/11, our government turned to torture, seeking information about the terrorists who committed the atrocity and others who might follow after them. Senior officials ordered the torture of men at military bases and detention facilities in Afghanistan and Iraq, in secret CIA prisons set up across the globe, and in other countries – including Libya and Egypt -- where abusive regimes were asked to do Washington’s dirty work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_for_americas_conscience/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/memorial_for_americas_conscience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gets his way</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/khalid_sheikh_mohammed_gets_his_way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/khalid_sheikh_mohammed_gets_his_way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama officials insisted the terror mastermind receive a military tribunal this week, but their arguments are bunk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A military guard will be on each arm of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as he is led into a courtroom on Saturday to be arraigned for a second time before a military commission at Guantanamo Bay. He went through the same process in the same courtroom on nearly the same charges almost four years ago in the closing months of the Bush administration. The fact that President Obama chooses now, six months before voters choose between him and Mitt Romney, to restart what some have dubbed “the trial of the century,” using a second-rate system of justice he had ordered stopped at a facility he had ordered closed, makes an unflattering statement about the timidity of his leadership and the malleability of his principles.</p><p>Apologists for the tarnished military commissions, like Attorney General Eric Holder and the sixth and current chief prosecutor Brigadier General Mark Martins, acknowledge that our regular federal courts are best suited for terrorism trials. Holder told an audience at Northwestern University in March:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/khalid_sheikh_mohammed_gets_his_way/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/khalid_sheikh_mohammed_gets_his_way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantanamo&#8217;s deepening failure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/guantanamos_deepening_failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/guantanamos_deepening_failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morris Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12312271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The secretive military system for prosecuting accused terrorists is a travesty, says the man who once ran it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Defense Department specializes in euphemism. “Limited kinetic action” is a polite way of saying “war,” and “collateral damage” does not sound as blunt as “dead children.”  When I was chief prosecutor for the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay during the Bush administration, I was told not to say publicly that a detainee had “attempted suicide.”  The government-approved term for the act was “self-injurious behavior.”  I could not say “torture,” or as some called it, the “T-word." Instead, I had to say “enhanced interrogation techniques.”</p><p>The euphemism tradition remains alive and well in the Obama administration.  The slogan “fairness, transparency, justice” is featured prominently throughout the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/guantanamos_system_of_injustice/singleton/">military commissions’</a> new half-million-dollar <a href="http://www.mc.mil/">website</a>.  The slogan even shows up when case document links lead to a notice saying the “document you are trying to access is currently undergoing a security review” and might be posted later if the government decides it is “publicly releasable.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/guantanamos_deepening_failure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/guantanamos_deepening_failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantanamo&#8217;s system of injustice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/guantanamos_system_of_injustice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/guantanamos_system_of_injustice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12197541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first trial of an accused terrorist exposes the flaws of "reformed" military commissions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brig. Gen. Mark Martins, chief prosecutor for the Office of Military Commissions, has lately appeared at bar association conferences promoting “reformed military commissions” at Guantanamo. Speaking to the New York City bar association on January 11, Martins said the military commissions were “comparable to federal courts in their incorporation of all of the fundamental guarantees of a fair and just trial demanded by our values.” Indeed, a new masthead on the military commission website, put up after Martins took over, reads: “Fairness, Transparency, Justice.”</p><p>Yet this week, behind thick bulletproof glass in a secure hangar-like courtroom at Guantanamo, I saw vast differences between the two systems. One notices first the physical – the few observers permitted to visit the isolated island base reach the courthouse through a maze of walkways secured by high dark-mesh fences, guards and double barbed wire on both sides. Instead of sitting in the courtroom, observers sit in an adjoining room, behind glass, and hear voices on 40-second delay to allow court security officers to cut off the audio should any classified information be uttered. In the dock this week was Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a Saudi of Yemeni descent accused of planning and participating in the bombing of the destroyer, the USS <em>Cole</em>, on October 12, 2000. The attack killed 17 US servicemen and injured many more. With US service members killed a federal court clearly would have jurisdiction over the case, so the government must have some other reason for choosing a military commission.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/guantanamos_system_of_injustice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/guantanamos_system_of_injustice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart blasts Congress, Obama over terror bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/jon_stewart_blasts_congress_obama_over_terror_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/jon_stewart_blasts_congress_obama_over_terror_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10302100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Comedy Central host voices amazement at the government's newest encroachments on civil liberties]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you're a stickler for civil liberties, then you probably find the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/national_defense_authorization_act/">National Defense Authorization Act</a> to be somewhat troubling. The annual defense appropriations bill, which received the seal of approval from Congress last week, contains provisions that would allow the government to detain terror suspects (and associates thereof) for an indefinite period of time, without a trial.</p><p>The Obama administration has suggested that it's open to a veto of the bill -- a move that would appear consistent with his opposition to indefinite detentions when he was running for president. The only problem -- as Jon Stewart pointed out on "The Daily Show" last night -- is that the President Obama would veto the bill <em>not</em> because it runs counter our conception of liberty ... but because it doesn't go far enough.</p><p><strong>Part 1</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/jon_stewart_blasts_congress_obama_over_terror_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/jon_stewart_blasts_congress_obama_over_terror_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Guantanamo forever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense Authorization Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10268764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate contemplates a bipartisan bill to make permanent the failed system of indefinite detention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decade ago, after the Sept. 11attacks, President Bush authorized the detention without charge of alleged terrorist suspects. It had been decades since the United States had detained people without charge or trial on national security grounds. The last time was during World War II when thousands of Japanese-Americans were unjustly detained in internment camps. The U.S. has since acknowledged this mistake, paying reparations to those wrongly detained.</p><p>The Bush system of indefinite detention established at Guantanamo and elsewhere attempted to stand outside and circumvent the rule of law. This system has failed to prosecute more than a handful of terrorist suspects, while wrongfully detaining hundreds more. Yet Congress is now poised to make this system a permanent feature of U.S. law.</p><p>The National Defense Authorization Act, scheduled to be voted on by the Senate this week, contains several provisions that, if passed, would have the military police the streets, expand Guantanamo and indefinite detention elsewhere, and force certain terrorism suspects into military custody instead of charging them with crimes in civilian courts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;You Don&#8217;t Like the Truth&#8221;: Our first look at a Gitmo interrogation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/you_dont_like_truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/you_dont_like_truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bewildered Canadian teenager goes to Guantanamo Bay in this disturbing look inside the War on Terror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the extrajudicial killing of American citizen Anwar al-Awlaki and several other people in Yemen this week, we're faced (once again) with the realization that the United States Constitution has become a largely meaningless totem. It gets waved around enthusiastically by people on all sides of the political spectrum whenever it seems to serve their interests, but nobody pays much attention to what it actually says. Presumably President Obama, the military-intelligence establishment and the mainstream media are declaring Awlaki a special case. Thanks to the secret provisions of secret laws, he was deprived of all the rights of citizenship and not subject to the ordinary rule of law that extends back not merely to the Constitution but to the Magna Carta (at least).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/you_dont_like_truth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/you_dont_like_truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extraordinary rendition lawsuit also window into low point for American experiment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fight between subcontractors leads to the publication of details of the CIA's secret kidnapping program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawsuit between two aviation companies concerning a couple hundred thousand dollars in unpaid expenses has inadvertently <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-records-of-court-case-lie-details-of-secret-airlifts-of-terror-suspects-to-cia-run-prisons/2011/09/01/gIQAT3vetJ_story.html">led to the publicizing of a great deal of information</a> about the CIA's extraordinary rendition program. (The program involved the illegal transport of thousands of terrorism suspects to secret CIA prisons in foreign nations and then to countries where suspects could be tortured. It is basically "kidnapping" followed by "torture" but the CIA did it so no one went to jail for it.)</p><p>The records from this lawsuit between two sub-contractors involved in the renditions will eventually be taught in an undergrad history course titled "America:&#160;Where It All Went Wrong." Detainees were transported by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sportsflight_Airways">the same companies</a> that fly billionaires on private jets to their resort vacations. (The CIA doesn't have an air force, so they relied on massive government contractor DynCorp, which... just rented some private planes.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/rendition_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch McConnell uses Casey Anthony to make awful political point</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate minority leader renders satire obsolete]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says we cannot try terror suspects in federal courts because <strike>9/11</strike> <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/mcconnell_terrorists_could_get_off_in_civilian_cou.php">Casey Anthony</a>:</p><blockquote> <p>"These are not American citizens. We just found with the Caylee Anthony case how difficult it is to get a conviction in a U.S. court," McConnell told "Fox News Sunday." "I don't think a foreigner is entitled to all the protection in the Bill of Rights. They should not be in U.S. courts and before military commissions."</p> </blockquote><p>Thanks to the minority leader for <a href="http://prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&amp;year=2011&amp;base_name=this_mitch_mcconnell_quote_is">demonstrating exactly why</a> so many people couldn't figure out that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/07/05/casey_anthony_2012">my jokes</a> about Republicans responding to the Casey Anthony verdict were meant to be... jokes. I should know by now that there is no joking when it comes to the shamelessness and venality of these guys.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why bin Laden&#8217;s death should end the war on terror</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/ending_war_on_terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/ending_war_on_terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/20/ending_war_on_terrorism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House has ramped up anti-terrorism efforts but it's time to put Bush's ill-conceived crusade behind us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the seven weeks since the killing of Osama bin Laden, pundits and experts of many stripes have concluded that his death represents a marker of genuine significance in the story of America's encounter with terrorism. Peter Bergen, a bin Laden expert, was <a href="http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/02/bergen-time-to-move-on-from-war-on-terror">typically blunt</a> the day after the death when he wrote, "Killing bin Laden is the end of the war on terror. We can just sort of announce that right now."</p><p>Yet you wouldn't know it in Washington where, if anything, the Obama administration and Congress have interpreted the killing of al-Qaida's leader as a virtual license to double down on every "front" in the war on terror. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2011/05/02/hillary-clintons-remarks-on-bin-ladens-death/">no less blunt</a> than Bergen, but with quite a different endpoint in mind. "Even as we mark this milestone," she said on the day Bergen's comments were published, "we should not forget that the battle to stop al-Qaida and its syndicate of terror will not end with the death of bin Laden. Indeed, we must take this opportunity to renew our resolve and redouble our efforts."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/ending_war_on_terrorism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/20/ending_war_on_terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon press secretary irritated by having to do his job</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/25/pentagon_press_sec_whining/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/25/pentagon_press_sec_whining/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/25/pentagon_press_sec_whining</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geoff Morrell tragically had to devote his Easter weekend to dealing with Guantanamo files]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real victims so often get ignored. Here we were, concerned about the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/25/guantanamo-files-mental-health-suicides">inmates with psychotic illnesses</a>, the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/25/guantanamo-files-children-old-men">senile old men and the children</a> detained at Guantanamo Bay, and not once did we think about what Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell had to sacrifice because of the Guantanamo Files leaks: his Easter weekend.</p><p>Morrell, Pentagon press secretary since 2007, seems very disgruntled indeed about having to do his job in light of some truly disturbing findings in the leaked military dossiers:</p><p>&#8220;Thx to Wikileaks we spent Easter weekend dealing w/NYT &amp; other news orgs publishing leaked classified GTMO docs http://1.usa.gov/fWbGED,&#8221; Morrell <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/PentagonPresSec/status/62531762345091072">tweeted</a> Monday, linking to a news release from the Department of Defense condemning the release of classified documents.</p><p>When will the insensitive media stop thinking about oppressive detention systems and start worrying about federal employees&#8217; precious holiday weekends?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/25/pentagon_press_sec_whining/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/25/pentagon_press_sec_whining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>