<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gulf Oil Spill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gulf_oil_spill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gulf spill criminals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/24/first_criminal_charges_in_oil_spill_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/24/first_criminal_charges_in_oil_spill_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12909010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years on, the Feds have filed charges against a former BP employee for destroying critical evidence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years after oil from a BP well began gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S. Department of Justice has filed criminal charges alleging that a former BP employee destroyed critical evidence in the early days of the unfolding disaster.</p><p>The charges are the first to be filed in what the Obama administration has called the worst environmental disaster in American history, and they are significant because they <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/a-punishment-bp-cant-pay-off" target="_blank">target an individual</a> employee for his actions.</p><p>According to an <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/346635-mix-affidavit.html" target="_blank">affidavit</a> and <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/346636-mix-complaint.html" target="_blank">complaint</a> filed today in a Louisiana court, Kurt Mix, a former drilling and completions engineer, deleted email and text messages he had sent to senior BP managers estimating that the amount of oil spewing into the Gulf was many times greater than the amount stated publicly. Mix was specifically instructed by attorneys contracted by BP to retain his records before he deleted them, the affidavit states.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/24/first_criminal_charges_in_oil_spill_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/24/first_criminal_charges_in_oil_spill_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The horrific ramifications of the Gulf oil spill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/the_horrific_ramifications_of_the_gulf_oil_spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/the_horrific_ramifications_of_the_gulf_oil_spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12890551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years after the BP oil spill, deformed fish point to lasting environmental and health consequences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost two full years after the BP oil spill, a panel of experts gathered at the 17th annual Tulane Environmental Law Summit, to present the continuing impacts of the BP Oil Spill. That spill began with the April 20, 2010, explosion of the Deepwater Horizon drilling unit used by BP 40 miles off the Louisiana coast. Eleven men lost their lives. The resulting spill of oil into the Gulf of Mexico stands as the largest oil spill in U.S. history and the second largest environmental disaster in this country to date besides the nearly decade-long Dust Bowl of the 1930s. Scientists at the summit presented recent photographs of shrimp with no eyes and fish with cancerous tumors born long after the gulf was declared "safe" for fishing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/the_horrific_ramifications_of_the_gulf_oil_spill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/the_horrific_ramifications_of_the_gulf_oil_spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental groups challenge Shell drilling plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/us_gulf_oil_spill_drilling_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/us_gulf_oil_spill_drilling_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/09/us_gulf_oil_spill_drilling_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. government approved an oil exploration plan that involves five proposed deep sea wells]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmental groups are asking a federal appeals court to throw out a U.S. government decision to approve a Shell oil exploration plan that involves five proposed wells under more than 7,000 feet of water in the Gulf of Mexico.</p><p>The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement approved the plan in May. The plan also includes three previously approved wells 72 miles off Louisiana.</p><p>Defenders of Wildlife, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Natural Resources Defense Council claim in a petition filed Thursday in the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in Atlanta that the decision violates the law and that the environment would be harmed if it stands.</p><p>New regulations for deepwater drilling were imposed following last year's deadly rig explosion and Gulf oil spill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/us_gulf_oil_spill_drilling_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/09/us_gulf_oil_spill_drilling_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP sues partners as Gulf marks year since spill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/gulf_oil_spill_anniversary_bp_lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/gulf_oil_spill_anniversary_bp_lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/21/gulf_oil_spill_anniversary_bp_lawsuit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still widely criticized for spill, the oil giant filed a $40 billion lawsuit alleging negligence by the rig owner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP marked the first anniversary of the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill with a $40 billion lawsuit blaming the disaster on its partners, as Gulf residents held somber vigils and relatives flew over the waters where 11 oil rig workers died.</p><p>A year after the rig explosion that triggered the worst offshore oil spill in American history, President Barack Obama vowed to hold BP and others accountable for "the painful losses that they've caused."</p><p>For its part, BP filed a lawsuit alleging negligence by the rig owner and by the maker of the device that failed to stop the spill. Both of those companies filed their own claims, a reminder that lengthy court battles lie ahead.</p><p>The disaster began on the night of April 20, 2010, when the Deepwater Horizon rig burst into flames and killed the 11 men. The rest of the crew evacuated, but two days later the rig toppled into the Gulf and sank to the sea floor. Over the next 85 days, 206 million gallons of oil -- 19 times more than the Exxon Valdez spilled -- spewed from the well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/gulf_oil_spill_anniversary_bp_lawsuit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/21/gulf_oil_spill_anniversary_bp_lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil drilling: Lots of lobbying, no legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/why_no_oil_spill_legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/why_no_oil_spill_legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/20/why_no_oil_spill_legislation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The industry spent $146.5 million on federal lobbying. Is it any wonder Congress adopted no new laws?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one-year anniversary of the explosion at BP&#8217;s Macondo well, media outlets have spilled a fair amount of ink noting that not one law has been adopted by Congress on oil and gas drilling. A cursory look at the ever-forceful efforts of the oil and gas industry lobby makes this totally unsurprising.</p><p>Marcus Barum <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/19/nil-baby-nil-congress-fai_n_851274.html">writes</a> in the Huffington Post, that "despite introducing more than 150 bills to improve the safety and oversight of offshore drilling and holding more than 60 hearings to discuss the spill's causes and consequences with regulators, oil company officials, grieving relatives and Gulf-area fishermen," no bills have been adopted, and only two made it to the Senate.</p><p>"The oil industry has a veritable army at its disposal. They spend tens upon tens upon tens of millions on federal lobbying and campaign efforts," David Levinthal of the <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/index.php">Center for Responsive Politics</a> told Salon.</p><p>In 2010 the oil and gas industry spent $146.5 million on federal lobbying. This is almost three times the $52 million spent on lobbying in 2004.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/why_no_oil_spill_legislation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/why_no_oil_spill_legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 year later: Just how bad was Gulf spill?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Mother Nature just swallow the oil back up -- or is the worst yet to come?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the immediate aftermath of the <a href="http://www.economist.com/node/18587367?story_id=18587367">Deepwater Horizon rig explosion</a> -- which killed 11 workers and spawned an oil slick the size of Kansas -- it seemed clear that the event would be remembered as perhaps the worst environmental calamity in U.S. history. Now, one year later, arguments for the magnitude of the disaster are less self-evident.</p><p>The BP oil spill flushed upwards of 4 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico between April and July, 2010. But by August, the once-vast sheen of rust-colored muck had mostly disappeared from the ocean's surface. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1378679/BP-oil-spill-Day-scientists-hail-recovery-Gulf-Coast-pictures-real-damage.html?ito=feeds-newsxml">Official reports</a> claim that marine life is returning to normal.</p><p>According to an optimistic <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/04/20/135566376/weekly-standards-mucky-lessons-of-the-bp-oil-spill">Weekly Standard</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>If there was an unexpected hero to the story, it was Mother Nature...The Gulf oil spill is, indeed, much less of a calamity than most people expected. Said one environmental scientist in late July: "Mother Nature is doing what she is supposed to be doing and we're losing most of [the spilled oil] to microbial degradation in the open ocean."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/gulf_spill_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gulf oil disaster, one year later</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_gulf_oil_spill_anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_gulf_oil_spill_anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/20/us_gulf_oil_spill_anniversary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Communities across the Gulf coast reflect on anniversary of Deepwater Horizon explosion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relatives of some of the 11 men who died aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig are flying over the Gulf of Mexico on Wednesday, back to the epicenter of the worst offshore oil spill in the nation's history.</p><p>Meanwhile, on land, vigils were scheduled in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida to mark the spill.</p><p>On the night of April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon, a rig owned by Transocean Ltd., burst into flames after drilling a well for BP PLC, killing 11 workers on or near the drilling floor. The rest of the crew evacuated, but two days later the rig toppled into the Gulf and sank to the sea floor. The bodies were never recovered.</p><p>Over the next 85 days, 206 million gallons of oil -- 19 times more than the Exxon Valdez spilled -- spewed from the well. In response, the nation commandeered the largest offshore fleet of vessels since D-Day, and BP spent billions of dollars to clean up the mess, saving itself from collapse.</p><p>"I can't believe tomorrow has been one year because it seems like everything just happened," Courtney Kemp, whose husband Roy Wyatt Kemp was killed on the rig, wrote on her Facebook page Tuesday. "I have learned a lot of things through all of this but the most important is to live each day as if it were your last ... what matters is if you truly live."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_gulf_oil_spill_anniversary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_gulf_oil_spill_anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Week in Uppers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/10/week_in_uppers_41011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/10/week_in_uppers_41011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/10/week_in_uppers_41011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cheerful news you missed while fretting about a government shutdown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div>While most of the country was holding its collective breath this week over the prospect of a government shutdown, not all news was so stressful. We've compiled a collection of stories from this past week more likely to make you smile than frown:</div>
</p><ul>
<li>Five-year-old Jesse Koczon was inconsolable after learning he was "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xKQsmqTWpI&amp;feature=player_embedded#at=29">too small</a>" to be governor of New Jersey. Koczon became a viral star after video of the episode hit the Internet, and now Gov. Chris Christie has made the boy honorary governor for a day. (<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504784_162-20051811-10391705.html">CBS News</a>)</li>
</ul><p>
    <object height="278" width="440"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kLWqVVJeRWA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="278" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kLWqVVJeRWA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="440"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/10/week_in_uppers_41011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/10/week_in_uppers_41011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Department considers manslaughter charge in BP oil spill case</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/us_gulf_oil_spill_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/us_gulf_oil_spill_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/29/us_gulf_oil_spill_probe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP managers could face manslaughter charges for Deepwater Horizon rig explosion that caused the Gulf oil spill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People familiar with the investigation of the Gulf oil spill say manslaughter and perjury are among the possible violations being explored by Justice Department investigators still in the early stages of their probe.</p><p>Those familiar with the inquiry said the Justice Department is not ruling out the possibility of bringing manslaughter charges against companies or managers responsible for the explosion aboard the rig that killed 11 workers last April.</p><p>These people added that the department also is examining congressional testimony by company executives, including former BP CEO Tony Hayward, to determine whether their statements were untruthful.</p><p>They cautioned that the investigation is still far from complete and they spoke on condition of anonymity about the ongoing investigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/us_gulf_oil_spill_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/us_gulf_oil_spill_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientist finds Gulf bottom still oily, dead months after BP spill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/20/bp_oil_spill_lingers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/20/bp_oil_spill_lingers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/20/bp_oil_spill_lingers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less recovery than expected has occurred since spill as life on parts of Gulf floor has been decimated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oil from the BP spill remains stuck on the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, according to a top scientist's video and slides that she says demonstrate the oil isn't degrading as hoped and has decimated life on parts of the sea floor.</p><p>That report is at odds with a recent report by the BP spill compensation czar that said nearly all will be well by 2012.</p><p>At a science conference in Washington Saturday, marine scientist Samantha Joye of the University of Georgia aired early results of her December submarine dives around the BP spill site. She went to places she had visited in the summer and expected the oil and residue from oil-munching microbes would be gone by then. It wasn't.</p><p>"There's some sort of a bottleneck we have yet to identify for why this stuff doesn't seem to be degrading," Joye told the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual conference in Washington. Her research and those of her colleagues contrasts with other studies that show a more optimistic outlook about the health of the gulf, saying microbes did great work munching the oil.</p><p>"Magic microbes consumed maybe 10 percent of the total discharge, the rest of it we don't know," Joye said, later adding: "there's a lot of it out there."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/20/bp_oil_spill_lingers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/20/bp_oil_spill_lingers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Justice Department sues BP for Gulf oil spill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_gulf_oil_spill_justice_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_gulf_oil_spill_justice_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/15/us_gulf_oil_spill_justice_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Administration's lawsuit names nine companies, seeking damages and civil penalties under Clean Water Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Justice Department on Wednesday sued BP Exploration and Production Inc. and eight other companies in the Gulf oil spill disaster in an effort to recover billions of dollars from the largest offshore spill in U.S. history.</p><p>The Obama administration's lawsuit asks that the companies be held liable without limitation under the Oil Pollution Act for all removal costs and damages caused by the oil spill, including damages to natural resources. The lawsuit also seeks civil penalties under the Clean Water Act.</p><p>An explosion that killed 11 workers at BP's Macondo well last April led to oil spewing from the company's undersea well -- more than 200 million gallons in all by the government's estimate. BP disputes the figure.</p><p>The department filed the suit in federal court in New Orleans.</p><p>The other defendants in the case are Anadarko Exploration &amp; Production LP and Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC; Triton Asset Leasing GMBH; Transocean Holdings LLC and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. and Transocean Deepwater Inc.; and BP's insurer, QBE Underwriting Ltd./Lloyd's Syndicate 1036.</p><p>Anadarko and MOEX are minority owners of the well that blew out. Transocean owned the rig that BP was leasing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_gulf_oil_spill_justice_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/us_gulf_oil_spill_justice_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP Gulf spill fund pays accelerated claims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/us_gulf_oil_spill_claims_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/us_gulf_oil_spill_claims_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/13/us_gulf_oil_spill_claims_4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenneth Feinberg: Two-week option offers $5,000 to individuals and $25,000 to businesses agreeing not to sue]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The administrator of a $20 billion fund paying damages from the Gulf oil spill says claimants who want quick resolution can receive a one-time payment worth thousands of dollars, but they would get no more money.</p><p>Attorney Kenneth Feinberg said Monday that the new option, which would pay claimants within two weeks, is for people who just want to get on with their lives.</p><p>Feinberg says that individuals who have already received compensation from the fund can now get a $5,000 check, but they would have to relinquish their right to sue BP PLC and would not be eligible for a final settlement. Businesses would receive a check for as much as $25,000.</p><p>The other options are to seek quarterly interim payments for losses, or file for a lump sum final settlement, also giving up the right to sue BP over its April 20 oil well blowout.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/us_gulf_oil_spill_claims_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/us_gulf_oil_spill_claims_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government won&#8217;t lift drilling ban in Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/us_gulf_oil_spill_florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/us_gulf_oil_spill_florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/01/us_gulf_oil_spill_florida</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama official says that eastern Gulf of Mexico is off limits for at least seven years because of BP oil spill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration won't allow any new oil drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico for at least the next seven years because of the BP oil spill, a senior administration official told The Associated Press on Wednesday.</p><p>The area that includes the waters off Florida's coast had been considered for drilling as part of the management plan for the Outer Continental Shelf. Just a month before the April spill, the Obama administration had announced plans to allow drilling in the eastern Gulf.</p><p>"In light of the BP spill, we've learned a lot and understand the need to elevate the safety and environmental standards," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the decision hadn't been announced yet. "We took a second look at the announced plan and modified it to remove the Eastern Gulf of Mexico from leasing consideration."</p><p>Interior Secretary Ken Salazar planned to discuss the decision Wednesday afternoon.</p><p>The eastern Gulf of Mexico -- an area stretching from 125 to 300 miles off Florida's coast -- was singled out for protection by Congress in 2006 as part of a deal with Florida lawmakers that made available 8.3 million acres to oil and gas development in the east-central Gulf. The protected region is to remain off limits to energy development until 2022.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/us_gulf_oil_spill_florida/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/us_gulf_oil_spill_florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds: Oil dispersant worked better than thought</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/23/us_gulf_oil_spill_dispersant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/23/us_gulf_oil_spill_dispersant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/23/us_gulf_oil_spill_dispersant</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversial chemicals helped break up about 16 percent of the Gulf oil spill -- twice as much as August estimate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government now figures that oil dispersants did a better job of breaking up the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico than it first calculated.</p><p>A new analysis released Tuesday says the controversial chemicals helped break up about 32 million gallons of oil -- about 16 percent of the spill. That's about twice as much as a federal team figured in August. Scientists say that is mostly due to the unusual method of injecting the chemicals so deep, about a mile down near the busted well.</p><p>Study author Bill Lehr (LAYR) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says injecting the chemicals a mile deep proved to be roughly four times more effective per gallon of oil as spraying the chemical on the ocean's surface.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/23/us_gulf_oil_spill_dispersant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/23/us_gulf_oil_spill_dispersant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mixed reviews for BP&#8217;s beach-cleaning efforts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/us_gulf_oil_spill_scrubbing_beaches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/us_gulf_oil_spill_scrubbing_beaches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/17/us_gulf_oil_spill_scrubbing_beaches</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some fear the oil giant's rush to remove buried tar mats is making matters worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's typically a beautiful, quiet stretch of beach in the fall now resembles a construction site. Bulldozers and yellow dump trucks shake the ground; a giant sifting machine spits clean sand out one end, tar balls out another.</p><p>With its Macondo well dead and few visitors on the coast during the offseason, BP has launched its biggest push yet to deep-clean the tourist beaches that were coated with crude during the worst of the Gulf oil spill. Machines are digging down into the sand to remove buried tar mats left from the Deepwater Horizon disaster.</p><p>The work is getting mixed reviews. Many are anxious to see the beaches cleaned as quickly as possible by whatever means are available. Others say BP may be making matters worse by bringing heavy equipment onto beaches and spreading the petroleum stain.</p><p>Some fear fresh environmental damage from the work itself, which can kill tiny creatures that live in the sand. Even BP acknowledges that fresh tar balls are still hitting the coast, meaning some of the work might be premature. Still, local officials have given the company a Jan. 1 deadline to be done.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/us_gulf_oil_spill_scrubbing_beaches/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/us_gulf_oil_spill_scrubbing_beaches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana oyster pie with shrimp and scallops</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/oyster_pie_with_shrimp_and_scallops_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/oyster_pie_with_shrimp_and_scallops_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitchen Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/kitchen_challenge/2010/11/15/oyster_pie_with_shrimp_and_scallops_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This rich seafood pie pays homage to the fishing culture of South Louisiana]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the kid table at Thanksgiving? My rowdy brothers and I snugged up tight to a card table in the dining room at Grandma's. After grace Mamma piled our plates high -- turkey and dirty rice dressing with gravy, macaroni and cheese, various tasty vegetables, potato salad, pickles, olives (green <em>and</em> black), celery and carrot sticks and cranberries (jelly <em>and</em> sauce). The trick was to find a spot among the splendor for your hot buttered roll so the bottom got full of gravy. Kiddy heaven.</p><p>Life was good at the kid table. What did we care that the grown-ups kept the yucky old oyster pie at their table? It took me a few years to catch on to what they were up to, the sneaks. I was probably 12 or so before I got to taste that masterfully simple creation. The combination of tender oysters in deeply flavored roux gravy, scallions, red pepper and tender pastry helped me decide some things were worth growing up for.</p><p>We had a magical connection through food, my grandmother, Miss Alice, and I. Her house was across the street from my grade school and I went there for lunch every day. She worried that I was too thin, too delicate, so she fed me up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/oyster_pie_with_shrimp_and_scallops_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/oyster_pie_with_shrimp_and_scallops_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: White House altered drilling ban paper</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/us_gulf_oil_spill_114/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/us_gulf_oil_spill_114/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/10/us_gulf_oil_spill_114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama administration tweaked the drilling moratorium to look peer-reviewed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An inspector general says the White House edited a report about the administration's moratorium on offshore oil drilling to make it appear that scientists and experts supported the idea of a six-month ban on new drilling.</p><p>The Interior Department's inspector general says the changes resulted "in the implication that the moratorium recommendation had been peer reviewed." But it hadn't been.</p><p>Still, the report said the administration did not violate federal rules because it had offered a formal apology and already publicly clarified the nature of the expert review.</p><p>The Web site Politico was first to report the inspector general's findings. The Associated Press on Wednesday obtained a copy of the report, which has not been publicly released.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/us_gulf_oil_spill_114/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/us_gulf_oil_spill_114/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chevron announces plans to drill new wells in Gulf</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/us_chevron_gulf_drilling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/us_chevron_gulf_drilling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/21/us_chevron_gulf_drilling</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The oil giant may be one of the first to ask for drilling permits  since the moratorium was lifted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chevron Corp. may be one of the first companies to ask permission to drill new wells in the Gulf of Mexico since the moratorium was lifted.</p><p>The San Ramon, Calif., oil giant said Thursday it plans to file an application for drilling permits in the next several days for various deepwater projects in the Gulf.</p><p>The government says it hasn't received any new applications for drilling permits since the Interior Department lifted the ban earlier this month.</p><p>A Chevron spokesman didn't specify which projects would be included in the application. But the company said it will devote $7.5 billion toward two new fields in about 7,000 feet of water off the Louisiana coast.</p><p>Projects at those depths were halted for several months following an explosion on a BP operation that killed 11 people and led to the largest offshore oil spill in U.S. history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/us_chevron_gulf_drilling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/us_chevron_gulf_drilling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panel: White House blocked worst-case oil spill figures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/us_gulf_oil_spill_113/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/us_gulf_oil_spill_113/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2010/10/06/us_gulf_oil_spill_113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOAA knew how bad it could be, but the public was left in the dark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House blocked efforts by federal scientists to tell the public just how bad the Gulf oil spill could have been, according to a panel appointed by President Barack Obama to investigate the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.</p><p>In documents released Wednesday, the national oil spill commission's staff reveals that in late April or early May the White House budget office denied a request from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to make public the worst-case discharge from the blown-out well. The Unified Command -- the government team in charge of the spill response -- also was discussing the possibility of making the numbers public, the report says, citing interviews with government officials.</p><p>The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p><p>But Jerry Miller, head of the White House science office's ocean subcommittee, told The Associated Press in an interview at a St. Petersburg, Fla., conference on the oil's flow that he didn't think the budget office censored NOAA.</p><p>"I would very much doubt that anyone would put restrictions on NOAA's ability to articulate factual information," Miller said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/us_gulf_oil_spill_113/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/us_gulf_oil_spill_113/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panel: Transocean not providing oil spill documents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/us_gulf_oil_spill_investigation_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/us_gulf_oil_spill_investigation_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/05/us_gulf_oil_spill_investigation_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Co-chair of federal investigation panel says organization has failed to provide materials for two months]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Members of a federal panel investigating the cause of the Gulf of Mexico rig explosion and oil spill and how to improve safety and oversight are accusing rig owner Transocean of thwarting their efforts to get to critical documents and a witness.</p><p>The co-chair of the panel, U.S. Coast Guard Capt. Hung Nguyen, told a packed hearing room Tuesday in a New Orleans suburb that members have been trying for two months to get Transocean to turn over materials related to its compliance with international safety management codes.</p><p>Nguyen says the panel also has been unable to get a specific Transocean manager to come in and testify about safety.</p><p>Transocean lawyers say the document request is too cumbersome. They say whether the witness testifies isn't within their control.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/us_gulf_oil_spill_investigation_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/us_gulf_oil_spill_investigation_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

