<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Gun Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/gun_control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:48:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is this the sign Democrats need to try again on guns?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Landrieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Hagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Begich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polls show voters reward senators who took tough votes on gun control, and punish those who didn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've already seen some political fallout for senators who cast key votes either way on the compromise bill to expand background checks that the Senate killed two weeks ago -- and it may bode well for the <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/02/18024051-obama-vows-to-keep-at-gun-control-this-is-just-the-first-round?lite">round-two</a> <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/biden-planning-fresh-gun-control-push-90883.html">push</a> on gun control currently in the works. </p><p>While there's already been downside for those who voted against the bill, <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_BackgroundChecks_502.pdf">today we learn</a> that red state Democrats who voted in favor of the bill have been rewarded in the polls. In North Carolina, 52 percent of voters said they're more likely to reelect Sens. Kay Hagan of North Carolina because of her vote, while just 26 percent said the opposite. Meanwhile, in Louisiana, 45 percent said Sen. Mary Landrieu's vote boosted their likelihood of voting for the Democrat, compared to just 25 percent who said it makes them less likely to vote for her. She also saw her net approval rating tick up by six percentage points. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA is getting a new president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Keene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Porter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Alabama attorney will replace David Keene as the head of the gun lobby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Keene will be replaced by Alabama attorney Jim Porter as president of the NRA, once Keene's two-year term officially ends at this weekend's NRA convention in Houston.</p><p><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/01/nra-to-get-new-president/">CNN</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>While Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre is widely known as the face of the NRA, Keene had an active role in publicity and media appearances, especially in the wake of the Newtown elementary school massacre that left 26 people dead.</p> <p>Porter has been serving as the NRA's first vice president, and before that he served as the group's second vice president. The presidency, an unpaid position, is the next stop in the NRA's leadership rotation.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accidental child shooting in Kentucky sparks gun debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 5-year old accidentally shot his sister with a gun made by a company that markets for children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BURKESVILLE, Ky. (AP) — As Stephanie Sparks cleaned the kitchen, her 5-year-old son, Kristian, began playing with a rifle he was given last year. She stepped out onto the front porch, poured grease out of a frying pan for the dogs and "heard the gun go off," a Kentucky coroner said.</p><p>Authorities said the boy had fatally shot his 2-year-old sister, Caroline, in the chest.</p><p>In rural southern Kentucky, far removed from the national debate over gun control, where some children get their first guns even before they start first grade, the accident stunned the community.</p><p>Kristian's rifle was kept in a corner of the mobile home, and the family didn't realize a bullet had been left in it, Cumberland County Coroner Gary White said.</p><p>"Down in Kentucky where we're from, you know, guns are passed down from generation to generation," White said. "You start at a young age with guns for hunting and everything."</p><p>What is more unusual than a child having a gun, he said, is "that a kid would get shot with it."</p><p>In this case, the rifle was made by a company that sells guns specifically for children — "My first rifle" is the slogan — in colors ranging from plain brown to hot pink to royal blue to multi-color swirls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the conservative revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost half of Republicans think an armed revolution may be needed soon. What does it mean for guns and democracy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's plenty of proof of an authoritarian streak and animus toward democratic ideals in today's conservative movement. There was the movement's use of its judicial power to halt a vote recount and instead <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html">install</a> a president who had lost the popular vote. There is the ongoing GOP effort to make it <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">more difficult for people to cast a vote in an election</a>. There is the GOP's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html">record use of the Senate filibuster</a> to kill legislation that the vast majority of the country supports. There is a GOP leader's declaration that what the American people want from their government simply <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2627805#.UYEaob8Ts18">"doesn't matter."</a></p><p>Up until today, you might have been able to write all that anti-democratic pathology off as one infecting only the Republican Party's politicians and institutional leadership, but not its rank-and-file voters. But then this morning Fairleigh Dickinson University released this gun control-related pollshowing that authoritarianism runs throughout the the entire party.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>276</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big money arms the NRA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Center for Public Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The failure of background checks legislation is no great mystery. The gun industry has Washington in its pocket]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/node/12462/syndication/tracking"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/center-500px-logo-e1365812656958.jpg" alt="The Center for Public Integrity" align="left" /></a> In the days leading up to last month’s crucial votes on the most significant gun control legislation to come before the Senate in nearly two decades, polls showed that about 90 percent of Americans supported background checks for all gun purchases. But when the clerk called the roll, the centerpiece amendment — requiring background checks for firearm sales at gun shows, through classified ads and on the Internet — got just <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00097" target="_blank">54 “yea’s,”</a> six votes short of the 60 vote super-majority required.<span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"> </span></p><p>Just four months after Adam Lanza killed 26 people at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and President Obama promised tougher gun laws, the vote proved to be the latest in a long-running string of victories for gun rights activists, the firearms industry and particularly the National Rifle Association, the nation’s pre-eminent gun lobby.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans embrace conspiracy theory that DHS is buying up ammo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Inhofe and Jim Jordan believe the Obama Administration is trying to curb access to bullets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conspiracy theory is getting renewed life among Republicans who claim that the Obama administration, specifically the Department of Homeland Security, is buying up ammunition in order to thwart gun owners by taking over the market. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., and Rep. Frank Lucas, both Republicans from Oklahoma, introduced a bill last week to crack down on the alleged practice.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/news/296471-gop-aims-to-slow-federal-bullet-buys">The Hill</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe and Rep. Frank Lucas have introduced a bill that would prohibit every government agency — except the military — from buying more ammunition each month, than the monthly average it purchased from 2001 to 2009.</p> <p>The lawmakers say the Obama administration is buying up exceedingly high levels of ammunition in an attempt to limit the number of bullets the American public have access to on the open marketplace.</p></blockquote><p>Inhofe argued that Obama has been "adamant about curbing law-abiding Americans’ access and opportunities to exercise their Second Amendment rights," and that "One way the Obama Administration is able to do this is by limiting what’s available in the market with federal agencies purchasing unnecessary stockpiles of ammunition."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-gun billboard sparks outrage over depiction of Native Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/pro_gun_billboard_sparks_outrage_over_depiction_of_native_americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/pro_gun_billboard_sparks_outrage_over_depiction_of_native_americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Turn in your arms. The government will take care of you," says the billboard's sarcastic message]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A billboard in Greeley, Colorado, is causing outrage among residents because of its use of Native Americans to oppose gun control. The billboard features a picture of three Native Americans with the sarcastic message: "Turn in your arms. The government will take care of you."</p><p>The billboard was paid for by a group of locals who asked to remain anonymous, according to Lamar Advertising, which spoke with <a href="http://www.9news.com/news/article/333338/188/Native-Americans-incensed-over-pro-gun-billboard">KUSA</a>.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/29/progun-native-american-bi_n_3179065.html">AP</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/pro_gun_billboard_sparks_outrage_over_depiction_of_native_americans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/pro_gun_billboard_sparks_outrage_over_depiction_of_native_americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Most wanted background checks to pass the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/poll_most_wanted_background_checks_to_pass_the_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/poll_most_wanted_background_checks_to_pass_the_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[65 percent said the Senate should have passed the measure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In another <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/poll_finds_big_support_for_background_checks/">poll</a> showing broad public support for expanding gun background checks, Gallup found that 65 percent of Americans say that the Senate should have passed the measure, while 29 percent agree with the decision to block it.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162083/americans-wanted-gun-background-checks-pass-senate.aspx">Gallup</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Prior to the Senate's failure to pass the measure, numerous polls showed that roughly nine in 10 Americans favor expanded gun background checks in concept -- a fact that <a href="http://pollingmatters.gallup.com/2013/04/senate-defeats-background-check-measure.html">a number of journalists, columnists, and politicians made note of</a>. Gallup's Jan. 19-20 <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/160085/americans-back-obama-proposals-address-gun-violence.aspx">survey</a>, for example, showed that 91% of Americans said they personally would vote for a measure requiring criminal background checks for all gun sales. Gallup asked this question again in the April 22-25 survey and found a slight decline, to 83% support. The wording of the new question was slightly modified from the January asking, which may be responsible for some of the change. But it also may be that the Senate's failure to pass the measure deflated Americans' support for it.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/poll_most_wanted_background_checks_to_pass_the_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/poll_most_wanted_background_checks_to_pass_the_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst Congress money can buy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/tk_5_partner_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/tk_5_partner_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Failed gun control legislation and a fertilizer plant explosion reveal how poisoned by big money our government is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to see why the public approval rating of Congress is down in the sub-arctic range — an icy <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/161771/congress-approval-remains-slump.aspx" target="_blank">15 percent by last count</a> — all you have to do is take a quick look at how the House and Senate pay worship at the altar of corporations, banks and other special interests at the expense of public aspirations and need.</p><p>Traditionally, political scientists have taught their students that there are two schools of thought about how a legislator should get the job done. One is to vote yay or nay on a bill by following the will of his or her constituency, doing what they say they want. The other is to represent them as that legislator sees fit, acting in the best interest of the voters — whether they like it or not.</p><p>But our current Congress — as cranky and inert as an obnoxious old uncle who refuses to move from his easy chair — never went to either of those schools. Its members rarely have the voter in mind at all, unless, of course, that voter’s a cash-laden heavy hitter with the clout to keep an incumbent on the leash and comfortably in office.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/tk_5_partner_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/tk_5_partner_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pat Toomey gets a background check poll bump</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/pat_toomey_gets_a_background_check_poll_bump/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/pat_toomey_gets_a_background_check_poll_bump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the bill failed, a new poll shows Toomey with his highest approval rating since taking office]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the Senate blocked legislation to expand gun background checks, Sen. Pat Toomey, a Republican who pushed for the measure, is still getting credit for trying. A new <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/pennsylvania/release-detail?ReleaseID=1888">Quinnipiac</a> poll shows Toomey with his highest approval ratings in Pennsylvania since he took office.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Pennsylvania voters approve 34 - 29 percent of the way U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey is handling gun control and give Sen. Toomey an overall 48 - 30 percent approval rating, his highest ever. By a 54 - 12 percent margin, voters think more favorably of Toomey because of his co-sponsorship of legislation to require expanded background checks.</p></blockquote><p>Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., on the other hand, is suffering, in part because of her vote against background checks. A poll earlier this week from the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/">showed</a> Ayotte's approval rating tank by 15 points since October.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/pat_toomey_gets_a_background_check_poll_bump/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/pat_toomey_gets_a_background_check_poll_bump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six dead after Illinois massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester Ill.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shooter entered a home and opened fire. A 6 year-old girl has been hospitalized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MANCHESTER, Ill. (AP) — The nephew of a small-town Illinois mayor shot and killed five people, including two boys, before leading police on a chase that ended in an exchange of gunfire that left him dead, authorities said Wednesday.</p><p>Illinois State Police said they believe Rick O. Smith, 43, entered the Manchester home through the back door and shot the victims at close range, leaving two women, one man and the boys dead. Two people were found in a bedroom, two in a second bedroom and the man in the hallway. A sixth victim, a 6-year-old girl, was injured and taken to a Springfield hospital.</p><p>"The offender took the 6-year-old out of the residence and put her in the hands of a neighbor," State Police Lt. Col. Todd Kilby said.</p><p>Officials have not revealed a motive for the killings. Police said the victims are related and they believe Smith and the victims were acquainted but they didn't provide details of the relationships.</p><p>A bystander called police and told them that Smith fled the home in a white sedan. A car chase ensued, leading authorities to the nearby town of Winchester, where Smith and officers exchanged gunfire. Officers shot Smith, and he later died at a hospital.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ayotte&#8217;s approval tanks after opposing background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Hampshire senator's approval rating is down 15 points, according to a new poll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling shows that Sen. Kelly Ayotte's, R-N.H., approval rating dropped 15 points, following her vote against the Senate's measure to impose stricter gun background checks.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/04/ayotte-faces-backlash-over-gun-vote.html">PPP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Ayotte now has a negative approval rating with 44% of voters giving her good marks and 46% disapproving. That's down a net 15 points from the last time we polled on her, in October, when she had a 48% approval with 35% disapproving. 75% of New Hampshire voters- including 95% of Democrats, 74% of independents, and 56% of Republicans- say they support background checks. And 50% of voters in the state say Ayotte's 'no' vote will make them less likely to support her in a future election, compared to just 23% who consider it to be a positive.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite background check consensus, mixed sentiment on gun bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/poll_people_are_angry_that_gun_control_failed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/poll_people_are_angry_that_gun_control_failed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a new poll, 39 percent say they were "very happy" or "relieved" that gun control failed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though recent polls show <a href="http://pollingmatters.gallup.com/2013/04/senate-defeats-background-check-measure.html">overwhelming</a> public support for laws implementing universal background checks, a new poll by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2013/04/24/National-Politics/Polling/release_229.xml">Pew Research/The Washington Post</a> finds that there is a mixed bag of sentiment regarding the failure of gun control measures in the Senate.</p><p>The poll surveyed Americans, and asked, "Which word best describes how you feel about the fact that this gun legislation did not pass?" In response, 32 percent said they were "disappointed" and 15 percent said they were "angry."</p><p>That's compared with 20 percent said they were "very happy," and 19 percent said they were "relieved."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/poll_people_are_angry_that_gun_control_failed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/poll_people_are_angry_that_gun_control_failed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newtown rejects budget with extra school security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/newtown_rejects_budget_with_extra_school_security_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/newtown_rejects_budget_with_extra_school_security_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly 4,500 residents voted on the plans, which would have increased spending by 4.7 percent next fiscal year ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEWTOWN, Conn. (AP) — Newtown residents have rejected a budget that included money for extra school security in the wake of the December school shootings.</p><p>Voters turned down the $72 million school budget by 482 votes and rejected the $39 million town government budget by 62 votes Tuesday. Nearly 4,500 residents voted on the plans, which would have increased spending by 4.7 percent next fiscal year.</p><p>Officials put an extra $1 million in the school and town budgets to hire extra police officers and unarmed security guards to put in each of Newtown's seven schools. The plan was spurred by the shootings that killed 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/newtown_rejects_budget_with_extra_school_security_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/newtown_rejects_budget_with_extra_school_security_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid: There may be a &#8220;path forward&#8221; on background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We're going to do our best to get something just as soon as we can," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., implied that Senate Democrats may have a way forward on gun background checks, following the measure's defeat last week at the hands of a Republican filibuster. "We are working on a path forward," Reid told reporters, according to <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/reid-dems-may-have-path-forward-on-gun">TPM</a>. "I think we have one, but we're not ready to move on that at this time."</p><p>He added: "We're going to do our best to get something just as soon as we can. It's really an issue that I feel very strongly about and the American people do also."</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/reid_there_may_be_a_path_forward_on_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun zealots: Shooting victims should stay out of debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Taranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Rep. Gabby Giffords and Newtown families are props and bullies, gun rights absolutists explain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Taranto, who not only writes a column for the Wall Street Journal but also edits its opinion website, rightfully became the most hated man on Twitter yesterday afternoon for questioning whether former congresswoman Gabby Giffords could have possibly written the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/opinion/a-senate-in-the-gun-lobbys-grip.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=1&amp;">Op-Ed</a> she published last week shortly after a gun control bill died in the Senate, considering how injured she remains after getting shot in the head two years ago.</p><p>Here's Taranto parsing the forensics of her column-writing abilities on an NRA radio show Friday, caught by Media Matters' Timothy Johnson <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/22/wsj-columnist-taranto-uses-gabby-giffords-injur/193712">yesterday</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graham: Guns, but not trials, for terror suspects</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lautenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator wants to strip terror suspects' right to a trial, but insists on preserving their right to buy a gun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is not pleased that the Obama administration decided to prosecute Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in civilian court, even though it would probably be <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/04/lindsey-graham-dhozkhar-tsarnaev-enemy-combatant">illegal</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/22/experts-enemy-combatant-designation-would-make-no-sense-in-tsarnaev-case/">counterproductive</a> to treat the U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant.</p><p>The senator, a lawyer and reserve Air Force JAG officer himself, called for stripping Tsarnaev of his constitutional rights to due process <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/04/shorter-lindsey-graham-constitution-what-constitution/275157/">even before</a> the 19-year-old was captured Friday evening. "The accused perpetrators of these acts were not common criminals attempting to profit from a criminal enterprise," Graham said on Twitter on Friday. "Under the Law of War we can hold #Boston suspect as a potential enemy combatant not entitled to Miranda warnings or appointment of counsel."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie pushing for expanded background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/chris_christie_pushing_for_expanded_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/chris_christie_pushing_for_expanded_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor is also pursuing a ban on .50-caliber Barrett rifles ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Gov. Chris Christie unveiled a push for stricter gun control laws in New Jersey, including an expansion of background checks, a ban on .50-caliber Barrett rifles and requirements for parental consent before minors can buy violent video games.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-19/christie-seeks-expanded-gun-checks-video-game-crackdown.html">Bloomberg News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Christie said New Jersey’s gun-control laws are already considered the second-toughest in the nation by the <a title="Open Web Site" href="http://www.bradycampaign.org/" rel="external">Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence</a>. He cited the state’s assault- weapons ban, a seven-day waiting period prior to any firearm purchase, the third-strictest capacity laws on magazine capacity in the country and a one-gun-a-month law.</p> <p>He is seeking to toughen laws by mandating that mental- health records are included in the instant background-check process at the time of a firearm purchase. He also is proposing bills to impose or strengthen criminal penalties for selling firearms to convicted felons, possessing a gun with the intent to unlawfully transfer, unlawfully possessing ammunition and engaging in firearms trafficking.</p></blockquote><p>“Ensuring there are common-sense safety measures when purchasing guns is not enough,” Christie said Monday in a press conference. “We must address the many different contributing factors.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/chris_christie_pushing_for_expanded_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/chris_christie_pushing_for_expanded_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Tsarnaevs might affect the gun control debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did they get their guns from the black market, online, a gun show, or a private sale in a neighboring state?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What began with two homemade bombs planted at the Boston Marathon ended after an extended shootout, when bombing suspects Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev used <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/20/us/boston-details/index.html">handguns and a rifle</a> to fight a running battle with police across several Massachusetts towns, leaving one officer dead and another severely wounded.</p><p>But police in the state tell <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/04/21/us/21reuters-usa-explosions-boston-guns.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">Reuters</a> and <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/mass-police-bomb-suspects-didnt-have-gun-permit">the AP</a> that neither brother had the permits required to carry a firearm in Massachusetts, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the country.</p><p>This isn't particularly surprising, since both brothers may have had trouble buying a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer. Younger brother Dzhokhar is 19, but federal law prohibits dealers from selling handguns to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/18_year_olds_can_buy_handguns/">someone under the age of 21</a>. Older brother Tamerlan was arrested for domestic violence in 2009 and if he was convicted (reports conflict at the moment), he would be prohibited from purchasing any kind of firearm from a dealer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>