<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Guns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is this the sign Democrats need to try again on guns?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Landrieu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Hagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Begich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polls show voters reward senators who took tough votes on gun control, and punish those who didn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've already seen some political fallout for senators who cast key votes either way on the compromise bill to expand background checks that the Senate killed two weeks ago -- and it may bode well for the <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/02/18024051-obama-vows-to-keep-at-gun-control-this-is-just-the-first-round?lite">round-two</a> <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/biden-planning-fresh-gun-control-push-90883.html">push</a> on gun control currently in the works. </p><p>While there's already been downside for those who voted against the bill, <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_BackgroundChecks_502.pdf">today we learn</a> that red state Democrats who voted in favor of the bill have been rewarded in the polls. In North Carolina, 52 percent of voters said they're more likely to reelect Sens. Kay Hagan of North Carolina because of her vote, while just 26 percent said the opposite. Meanwhile, in Louisiana, 45 percent said Sen. Mary Landrieu's vote boosted their likelihood of voting for the Democrat, compared to just 25 percent who said it makes them less likely to vote for her. She also saw her net approval rating tick up by six percentage points. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/is_this_the_sign_democrats_need_to_try_again_on_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the kiddie gun market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The youth market in firearms is growing, selling air-light guns in pink and blue with names like "My First Rifle"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, a 5-year-old boy in Kentucky shot and <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/02/boy-shoots-sister-my-first-rifle/2128573/" target="_blank">killed his 2-year-old sister</a> with a .22-caliber, single-shot Crickett rifle. The boy had been playing with the gun, a recent birthday gift, when it went off. The Cumberland Country coroner described the tragic incident as “just one of those crazy accidents.”</p><p>The Crickett is a small, air-light firearm billed as "My First Rifle" by gun manufacturer Keystone Sporting Arms. It comes in pink and blue. It is a "training wheels" gun, part of the growing youth market in firearms.</p><p>As NBC News <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/03/.UYOffRsmui4.twitter" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the conservative revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost half of Republicans think an armed revolution may be needed soon. What does it mean for guns and democracy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's plenty of proof of an authoritarian streak and animus toward democratic ideals in today's conservative movement. There was the movement's use of its judicial power to halt a vote recount and instead <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html">install</a> a president who had lost the popular vote. There is the ongoing GOP effort to make it <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">more difficult for people to cast a vote in an election</a>. There is the GOP's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html">record use of the Senate filibuster</a> to kill legislation that the vast majority of the country supports. There is a GOP leader's declaration that what the American people want from their government simply <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2627805#.UYEaob8Ts18">"doesn't matter."</a></p><p>Up until today, you might have been able to write all that anti-democratic pathology off as one infecting only the Republican Party's politicians and institutional leadership, but not its rank-and-file voters. But then this morning Fairleigh Dickinson University released this gun control-related pollshowing that authoritarianism runs throughout the the entire party.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>276</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass murder vs. terrorism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When did the definitions of these terms come to hinge on the perpetrator's weapon of choice?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>For critics of American foreign policy, it’s all but axiomatic that the designation of a violent act as “terrorism” says as much about the accuser as it does about the accused. The U.S. government itself <a href="http://publicintelligence.net/the-continually-expanding-definition-of-terrorism/">can’t decide</a> on a single working definition of the term, but a <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/0.85">standard one</a> denotes unlawful politically-motivated violence designed to intimidate a government or civilian population. Put pressure on any part of this definition and it starts to buckle.<ins cite="mailto:bhaskar" datetime="2013-04-25T20:32"></ins></p><p>“Unlawful”? Why can’t terrorists — as per the word’s original <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_terrorism">meaning</a> — be state actors? “Civilian population”? The category becomes meaningless if individuals can be retroactively <a href="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/05/29/analysis-how-obama-changed-definition-of-civilian-in-secret-drone-wars/">subtracted</a> from it for the crime of being struck by an American drone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The changing facts in the Boston investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important details like the suspects' weapons, NYC plans and the shootout keep changing. It's fueling conspiracies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of massive, complicated crimes it's not uncommon for a bit of crucial information to be immediately put forward by police, only to be contradicted later on. While it's understandable that initial leads and assertions might end up being wrong in a dynamic situation like the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing, wholesale contradictions can encourage skepticism of the motives of those releasing inaccuracies -- as with initial, false reports that Osama bin Laden <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/administration_backs_off_tale_of_osama_bin_laden_using_wife_as_human_shield.php">hid behind his wife</a> when U.S. forces shot him. Another effect of changing details can be to encourage conspiracy theorists who latch onto inconsistencies, and to undermine trust in authorities.</p><p>Now, almost a week after the Tsarnaev brothers fought a rolling street battle with dozens of heavily armed police officers, we learned Wednesday night that they had only a single handgun, according to sources who spoke with <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/single-gun-recovered-accused-boston-bombers/story?id=19028841#.UXlD9itATag">ABC News</a> and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/officials_bombing_suspects_had_one_gun_during_shootout_with_police_ap/">AP</a>, something that directly contradicts what officials had previously said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six dead after Illinois massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester Ill.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shooter entered a home and opened fire. A 6 year-old girl has been hospitalized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MANCHESTER, Ill. (AP) — The nephew of a small-town Illinois mayor shot and killed five people, including two boys, before leading police on a chase that ended in an exchange of gunfire that left him dead, authorities said Wednesday.</p><p>Illinois State Police said they believe Rick O. Smith, 43, entered the Manchester home through the back door and shot the victims at close range, leaving two women, one man and the boys dead. Two people were found in a bedroom, two in a second bedroom and the man in the hallway. A sixth victim, a 6-year-old girl, was injured and taken to a Springfield hospital.</p><p>"The offender took the 6-year-old out of the residence and put her in the hands of a neighbor," State Police Lt. Col. Todd Kilby said.</p><p>Officials have not revealed a motive for the killings. Police said the victims are related and they believe Smith and the victims were acquainted but they didn't provide details of the relationships.</p><p>A bystander called police and told them that Smith fled the home in a white sedan. A car chase ensued, leading authorities to the nearby town of Winchester, where Smith and officers exchanged gunfire. Officers shot Smith, and he later died at a hospital.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/six_dead_after_illinois_massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun zealots: Shooting victims should stay out of debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Taranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Rep. Gabby Giffords and Newtown families are props and bullies, gun rights absolutists explain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Taranto, who not only writes a column for the Wall Street Journal but also edits its opinion website, rightfully became the most hated man on Twitter yesterday afternoon for questioning whether former congresswoman Gabby Giffords could have possibly written the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/opinion/a-senate-in-the-gun-lobbys-grip.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=1&amp;">Op-Ed</a> she published last week shortly after a gun control bill died in the Senate, considering how injured she remains after getting shot in the head two years ago.</p><p>Here's Taranto parsing the forensics of her column-writing abilities on an NRA radio show Friday, caught by Media Matters' Timothy Johnson <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/22/wsj-columnist-taranto-uses-gabby-giffords-injur/193712">yesterday</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graham: Guns, but not trials, for terror suspects</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lautenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator wants to strip terror suspects' right to a trial, but insists on preserving their right to buy a gun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is not pleased that the Obama administration decided to prosecute Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in civilian court, even though it would probably be <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/04/lindsey-graham-dhozkhar-tsarnaev-enemy-combatant">illegal</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/22/experts-enemy-combatant-designation-would-make-no-sense-in-tsarnaev-case/">counterproductive</a> to treat the U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant.</p><p>The senator, a lawyer and reserve Air Force JAG officer himself, called for stripping Tsarnaev of his constitutional rights to due process <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/04/shorter-lindsey-graham-constitution-what-constitution/275157/">even before</a> the 19-year-old was captured Friday evening. "The accused perpetrators of these acts were not common criminals attempting to profit from a criminal enterprise," Graham said on Twitter on Friday. "Under the Law of War we can hold #Boston suspect as a potential enemy combatant not entitled to Miranda warnings or appointment of counsel."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Tsarnaevs might affect the gun control debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did they get their guns from the black market, online, a gun show, or a private sale in a neighboring state?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What began with two homemade bombs planted at the Boston Marathon ended after an extended shootout, when bombing suspects Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev used <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/20/us/boston-details/index.html">handguns and a rifle</a> to fight a running battle with police across several Massachusetts towns, leaving one officer dead and another severely wounded.</p><p>But police in the state tell <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/04/21/us/21reuters-usa-explosions-boston-guns.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">Reuters</a> and <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/mass-police-bomb-suspects-didnt-have-gun-permit">the AP</a> that neither brother had the permits required to carry a firearm in Massachusetts, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the country.</p><p>This isn't particularly surprising, since both brothers may have had trouble buying a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer. Younger brother Dzhokhar is 19, but federal law prohibits dealers from selling handguns to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/18_year_olds_can_buy_handguns/">someone under the age of 21</a>. Older brother Tamerlan was arrested for domestic violence in 2009 and if he was convicted (reports conflict at the moment), he would be prohibited from purchasing any kind of firearm from a dealer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: The NRA &#8220;willfully lied&#8221; on guns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_the_nra_willfully_lied_on_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_the_nra_willfully_lied_on_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national rifle association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today was a "shameful day for Washington," a feisty president says after a gun bill died in the Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking just minutes after a minority in the Senate <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/gop_filibuster_kills_background_checks/">killed</a> a bipartisan bill to expand background checks on gun sales -- something 90 percent of Americans support -- President Obama stood in the Rose Garden in front of weeping gun violence victims, including former Rep. Gabby Giffords, to give a searing indictment of the forces that just blocked even this modest reform.</p><p>Showing flashes of anger and passion rare for this president, Obama laid into the National Rifle Association and Senate Republicans, saying they "willfully lied on this bill," especially by erroneously claiming the bipartisan background check legislation known as Manchin-Toomey would create a national gun registry when, in fact, the bill made creating one a felony punishable by 15 years in prison. Even though politicians lie all the time, the word "lie" is almost never uttered in public discourse in Washington, let alone by the president, underscoring his unusual anger.</p><p>"Unfortunately, this pattern of spreading untruths about this legislation served a purpose. Those lies upset an intense minority of gun owners and that in turn intimidated a lot of senators," Obama said. "There were no coherent arguments as to why we shouldn't do this, it came down to politics."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_the_nra_willfully_lied_on_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_the_nra_willfully_lied_on_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on failed gun bill: &#8220;A shameful day for Washington&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_on_senate_rejection_of_background_checks_this_is_a_shameful_day_for_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_on_senate_rejection_of_background_checks_this_is_a_shameful_day_for_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The transcript of Obama's angry speech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a press conference on Wednesday, President Obama delivered a frustrated indictment of Senate Republicans and the gun lobby for blocking gun reform supported by "90 percent of the American people." Expanding background checks was a centerpiece of Obama’s reform package, and the Senate vote to block the measure is considered a serious blow to overall reform efforts.</p><p>Obama called the Senate rejection of expanded background checks "round one," and asked for those who "care deeply about preventing gun violence" to continue to push lawmakers on common sense reform. He closed his speech by saying: "I believe we are going to get this done. Sooner or later we're going to get this right."</p><p>Full transcript here:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_on_senate_rejection_of_background_checks_this_is_a_shameful_day_for_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/obama_on_senate_rejection_of_background_checks_this_is_a_shameful_day_for_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP filibuster kills background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/gop_filibuster_kills_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/gop_filibuster_kills_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "compromise" on gun reform supported by 90 percent of country dies in Senate after failing to secure 60 votes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bipartisan compromise proposal to expand background checks to more gun sales died in the Senate this afternoon after the bipartisan majority fell far short of the 60 votes needed to break a Republican filibuster on the bill. The vote was 54-46. While advocates thought they might be only two votes away not long ago, the six vote deficit makes it highly unlikely that the majority will ever secure the votes it needs. If Republicans had not filibustered, the measure would have passed, as final passage requires only 50 votes (plus the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Joe Biden).</p><p>The <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/the_republican_who_can_save_gun_control/">proposal</a>, authored by Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, was the best shot at passing any kind of expansion on background checks, even though it was far weaker than what Democrats and gun safety advocates had hoped for. But opponents of the bill deliberately <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS1gD4yiHs4&amp;feature=youtu.be">misrepresented</a> the bill by claiming it could lead to a national gun registry, which many gun advocates fear could lead to confiscation or even tyranny, even though the Manchin-Toomey proposal actually made it a felony for officials to create a registry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/gop_filibuster_kills_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/gop_filibuster_kills_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read our salon on gun violence and the Boston investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_salon_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_salon_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Sirota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-time Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sirota vs. Shapiro. Two opinionated commentators debated the guns bill and the Boston investigation. Read it here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update 3 (April 17, 2013, 11:00 a.m.)</strong>: The chat will be held today, Wednesday, at 1:30 EDT.</p><p><strong>Update 2 (7:30 EDT)</strong>: The chat has been rescheduled for Wednesday, April 17, at 12:40 p.m. EDT. See you then.</p><p><strong>Update (3:30 EDT)</strong>: As we follow this story <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/explosion_reported_near_finish_line_of_boston_marathon/">out of Boston</a>, this chat has been postponed for now. Please stay tuned for the new start time. Thank you.</p><p><strong>Original post</strong>: The gun reform bill currently being discussed in Congress faces <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/15/will-the-gun-bill-die-this-week/">an uncertain fate</a>. And while few on either side of the issue are pleased with the "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/how_the_nra_got_what_it_wanted/">compromise</a>," which focuses on background checks <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/04/background-check-loophole.php">with some exemptions</a>, the question remains: What is the best way to make Americans more safe from gun violence? As we watch the political drama play out, we asked two commentators with divergent views (and a zeal for debating) to discuss the issue with us — and you.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_salon_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/a_salon_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will gun bill die while we mourn Boston?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/will_gun_bill_die_while_we_mourn_boston/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/will_gun_bill_die_while_we_mourn_boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Geller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mile 26 of the tragic Boston Marathon was dedicated to the 26 victims of Newtown. Now their families may lose again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against the backdrop of the Boston Marathon tragedy, it feels unspeakably sad that <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/gun-control-bill-in-peril-90117.html#ixzz2QdwcwIW2">even compromise gun control legislation looks to be doomed in the Senate</a>. Bombs, not guns, were used in the Boston attack – trauma surgeons say they’ve pulled pellets and nails out of the bombing victims; some had between 10 and 40 pieces of shrapnel inside them. The Associated Press is reporting that the explosives may have been made with pressure cookers along with metal and ball bearings.</p><p>But on a day when the forces of violence have clearly achieved a temporary victory – the forces of good always win in the end, as Patton Oswalt beautifully notes -- our failure to combat the most common source of violence in our culture, the proliferation and easy availability of guns, seems particularly tragic. The fact that today is also the sixth anniversary of the Virginia Tech massacre adds just another layer of poignance to the news. While xenophobes obsess about a possible Muslim or al-Qaida role in the bombing, we ignore the most obvious ways to keep ourselves safer: by cracking down on automatic assault weapons and high-capacity magazines and the loopholes that let evil people kill so easily.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/will_gun_bill_die_while_we_mourn_boston/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/will_gun_bill_die_while_we_mourn_boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA 500 suicide highlights &#8220;hidden epidemic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/nra_500_suicide_highlights_hidden_epidemic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/nra_500_suicide_highlights_hidden_epidemic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nascar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shooting death at NRA-sponsored race highlights the gun violence that results in the most fatalities: suicide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News that a man shot and killed himself at a NASCAR race sponsored by the National Rifle Association Saturday night is sure to launch a thousand columns and politicians' statements making liberal use of the word "irony" -- and rightly so -- but it also underscores a type of gun violence that is the least talked about in Washington but also the most common: suicide.</p><p>Here's what <a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nascar-from-the-marbles/man-shoots-self-infield-nra-500-214951761--nascar.html">we know about</a> the incident: 42-year-old Kirk Franklin was found dead in the infield of the Texas Motor Speedway, where he had been camping. Police say the man died of a “self-inflicted” gunshot wound, apparently after getting into an argument with other campers. Alcohol may have been involved.</p><p>Of the more than 32,000 firearm-related deaths in 2011, almost 20,000 -- 62 percent -- were <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_06.pdf">suicides</a>. While horrific mass shootings like the one in Newtown, Conn., provoke national outrage and demands for legislation, they represent less than 1 percent of all gun deaths. It's the kind of quotidian but lethal admixture of mental health issues, interpersonal dispute and the presence of a firearm that is responsible for the majority of all gun deaths in this country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/nra_500_suicide_highlights_hidden_epidemic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/nra_500_suicide_highlights_hidden_epidemic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Missouri town where teachers carry guns and parents approve</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/a_missouri_town_where_teachers_carry_guns_and_the_parents_approve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/a_missouri_town_where_teachers_carry_guns_and_the_parents_approve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The staff provide their own guns, and must pass annual drug and mental health evaluations to carry at school ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the result of a new administrative policy, staff at Fairview School in West Plains, Mo., have been trained to carry concealed weapons, to the delight of many local parents. In order to carry a gun at the school, which runs from kindergarten through eighth grade, a group of Fairview employees underwent a 40-hour training course administered by a private security company. The staff, who provide their own firearms, must pass annual background, drug and mental health evaluations to maintain their carry license.</p><p>“Sooo very glad to hear this,” a woman whose grandchildren attend the school wrote in response to a local newspaper report touting the new policy, adding, “All schools in America should do this.”</p><p>As The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/15/us/missouri-school-trains-teachers-to-carry-guns.html?hp&amp;_r=0&amp;gwh=88E59BD10E314EAF926B378ADEF38BA8" target="_blank">reports</a>, arming teachers didn't cause a stir in West Plains, a community "in which the idea of guns in classrooms is not necessarily intimidating":</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/a_missouri_town_where_teachers_carry_guns_and_the_parents_approve/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/a_missouri_town_where_teachers_carry_guns_and_the_parents_approve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Joe Manchin: &#8220;God help us&#8221; if Congress doesn&#8217;t act to stop gun violence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sen_joe_manchin_god_help_us_if_congress_doesnt_act_to_stop_gun_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sen_joe_manchin_god_help_us_if_congress_doesnt_act_to_stop_gun_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But "we're close," added Democrat and Manchin ally Sen. Pat Toomey ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Pat Toomey, (R-Pa) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) went on "Face the Nation" to talk about a bipartisan Senate proposal to expand background checks, with Toomey <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3460_162-57579509/god-help-us-if-we-dont-act-on-gun-violence-manchin-says/" target="_blank">explaining</a> that not "a single word" in the bill "in any way infringes on the Second Amendment rights of a law-abiding citizen," adding optimistically: "I think when people see the bill they're going to support it."</p><p>And if they don't?</p><p>"We came here to do something," Manchin said. "We've got a chance to make a difference in people's lives. We have a chance to save lives and not infringe on law-abiding citizens of this country, gun owners like myself and Pat. We have that opportunity, and God help us if we don't do it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sen_joe_manchin_god_help_us_if_congress_doesnt_act_to_stop_gun_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sen_joe_manchin_god_help_us_if_congress_doesnt_act_to_stop_gun_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam Lanza was bullied while he attended Sandy Hook Elementary, family member says</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/adam_lanza_was_bullied_while_he_attended_sandy_hook_elementary_family_member_says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/adam_lanza_was_bullied_while_he_attended_sandy_hook_elementary_family_member_says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Lanza]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unnamed relative also alleges that Nancy Lanza considered suing the school for turning a blind eye to the abuse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Lanza was bullied while he attended Sandy Hook Elementary and his mother Nancy considered suing the school for turning a blind eye to the abuse, an unnamed Lanza family member <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/exclusive-lanza-mom-mulled-lawsuit-article-1.1315985" target="_blank">told</a> the New York Daily News.</p><p>"Adam would come home with bruises all over his body," the relative told the Daily News. "His mom would ask him what was wrong, and he wouldn't say anything. He would just sit there."</p><p>The family member went on to say that Lanza's mother was distressed by the abuse, and didn't believe school officials were protecting her son: "Nancy felt fiercely protective of him. She was convinced the school wasn't doing enough to protect Adam. It made her irate."</p><p>The relative also appears to attribute Lanza's emotional and mental health problems to the experience, telling the Daily News that he never "seemed right" after his time in Sandy Hook.</p><p>“He was a sick boy,” the relative said.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/adam_lanza_was_bullied_while_he_attended_sandy_hook_elementary_family_member_says/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/adam_lanza_was_bullied_while_he_attended_sandy_hook_elementary_family_member_says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the NRA got what it wanted</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/how_the_nra_got_what_it_wanted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/how_the_nra_got_what_it_wanted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We mocked it. But it stood strong, shifted the guns debate and won itself a sweet deal. Now who’s laughing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s hard to remember now, but in the immediate aftermath of the Sandy Hook school shooting in Newtown, Conn., this country seemed serious about gun safety reform. President Obama visited the community and tearfully <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-obamas-speech-at-prayer-vigil-for-newtown-shooting-victims-full-transcript/2012/12/16/f764bf8a-47dd-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html">invoked Scripture and vowed real action</a>. Hunting enthusiast and senator Joe Manchin (D-W. Va.) suggested he’d consider <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/12/joe-manchin-assault-weapons-nra-gun-control.html">supporting an assault weapons ban</a>. And National Rifle Association foe Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) called the organization “<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/the_nra_is_the_enabler_of_mass_murderers/">enablers of mass murderers</a>” and vowed to wage war on it -- and few rushed to its defense.</p><p>Then, somehow, things seemed to get even worse for the NRA. After a full week of silence after the tragedy, it <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-12-21/politics/36018141_1_mayhem-with-minimum-risk-nra-wayne-lapierre">held a press conference</a> in Washington, D.C., in which its leader, Wayne LaPierre, inspired laughter and ridicule by supporting zero reforms to guns, aside from a call for more of them (arm teachers!).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/how_the_nra_got_what_it_wanted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/how_the_nra_got_what_it_wanted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Stockman: &#8220;If babies had guns, they wouldn&#8217;t be aborted&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/steve_stockman_bumper_sticker_if_babies_had_guns_they_wouldnt_be_aborted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/steve_stockman_bumper_sticker_if_babies_had_guns_they_wouldnt_be_aborted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Stockman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas congressman tweeted his new re-election campaign bumper sticker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Steve Stockman, an uber-conservative Republican from Texas and unapologetic Twitter <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/steve-stockman-twitter-texas-congressman.html">troll</a>, tweeted that his re-election campaign has a new bumper sticker:</p><p>[embedtweet id="322525582216794113"]</p><p>He followed it up soon after with another abortion-related tweet:</p><p>[embedtweet id="322696542286905345"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/steve_stockman_bumper_sticker_if_babies_had_guns_they_wouldnt_be_aborted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/steve_stockman_bumper_sticker_if_babies_had_guns_they_wouldnt_be_aborted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>