<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Harry Reid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/harry_reid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reid bows to online protest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/reid_caves_in_response_to_online_protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/reid_caves_in_response_to_online_protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect Intellectual Property Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12205561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protest against SOPA derails the Senate bill favored by the majority leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Wednesday's one-day  blackout of Wikipedia, Craigslist and <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2012/01/sopa-blackout-who-is-joining-the-protest.html">scores of other sites</a> to protest the House of Representatives' Stop Online Piracy Act and its Senate companion, Protect IP Act; after Google's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/sopa-petition-gets-millions-of-signatures-as-internet-piracy-legislation-protests-continue/2012/01/19/gIQAHaAyBQ_story.html">collection of a reported 7 million petition signatures</a>; after seven co-sponsors of the Senate bill repudiated it and dozens of other rejected it, attention turned to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a supporter of the legislation. What would he do in response to the historic digital outcry?</p><p>On Friday morning, Reid settled the matter. "In light of recent events," <a href="http://democrats.senate.gov/2012/01/20/reid-statement-on-intellectual-property-bill/">read a statement sent out by his office</a>, "I have decided to postpone Tuesday's vote on the PROTECT I.P. Act."</p><p>The move by Reid to hit pause on the bill, known as PIPA, is a big deal -- not least as an acknowledgment that online protest is shaping his agenda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/reid_caves_in_response_to_online_protest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/reid_caves_in_response_to_online_protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Boehner and Reid play the budget game</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/budget_flim_flam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/budget_flim_flam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/27/budget_flim_flam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two main debt ceiling plans now on the table each call for significant spending cuts. But to what services?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A trillion here, 2 trillion there, <a href="http://www.dirksencenter.org/print_emd_billionhere.htm">pretty soon, we're talking about real money!</a> Or so you might think. While we still have no clear picture of what kind of deal Congress and the White House will finally cut to steer clear of debt ceiling disaster, we do know that some large numbers are being thrown around by both sides.</p><p>The first stage of the Boehner <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/07/25/how_to_make_rush_limbaugh_happy/index.html">"Two Step Plan to Be Mean to Obama"</a> promises "immediate" cuts of $1.2 trillion. Harry Reid's counter-proposal proposes $2.7 trillion in reductions, a total big enough to make most Democrats gulp at the prospect of the poor, sick and elderly suddenly shoved onto the street.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/budget_flim_flam/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/budget_flim_flam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WH: Reid plan to solve debt crisis &#8220;reasonable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/us_debt_showdown_white_house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/us_debt_showdown_white_house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/07/25/us_debt_showdown_white_house</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President puts his support behind Senate majority leader's proposal for $2.7T in tax-free cuts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House is getting behind a proposal by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to avert a debt-limit crisis by trimming $2.7 trillion of government spending. The White House stopped short of issuing a veto threat against a competing House Republican plan.</p><p>White House spokesman Jay Carney said in a statement that Reid's proposal was a "reasonable approach that should receive the support of both parties."</p><p>Reid's plan does not include any new tax revenue, as President Barack Obama has demanded. But unlike the GOP plan, it would extend the debt ceiling into 2013 -- an Obama ultimatum.</p><p>Carney said all the cuts proposed by Reid had already been agreed to by White House and Republican negotiators during talks led by Vice President Joe Biden. Those discussions broke down last month.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/us_debt_showdown_white_house/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/us_debt_showdown_white_house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s bogus debt ceiling bluff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/john_boehner_debt_ceiling_bluff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/john_boehner_debt_ceiling_bluff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/05/10/john_boehner_debt_ceiling_bluff</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hostage the GOP can't kill: Congress will not allow the U.S. government to default]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In exchange for raising the debt ceiling, Speaker of the House John Boehner <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/10/us/politics/10boehner.html?_r=1&amp;hp">wants trillions of dollars in cuts.</a> Or so he told the <a href="http://www.speaker.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=240370">Economic Club of New York on Monday night,</a> as he demanded "actual cuts and program reforms, not broad deficit or debt targets that punt the tough questions to the future."</p><blockquote>
<p>"And with the exception of tax hikes -- which will destroy jobs -- everything is on the table."</p>
</blockquote><p>Never mind the fact that "trillions of dollars of cuts" in any accelerated time frame would <a href="http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/blog/maximum-utility/john-boehners-premature-austerity/1306/">"destroy jobs" much more efficiently</a> than ending Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. And it's not even worth pointing out, again, the Republican demagoguery that portrays the statutory end of the Bush tax <em>cuts</em> as wild tax <em>hikes.</em> The speech is most useful in its demonstration of classic Washington politician projectionism: Boehner did not mention under what time frame the cuts should take place nor did he specify where exactly the cuts should come. So who, precisely, is punting the tough questions to the future?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/john_boehner_debt_ceiling_bluff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/john_boehner_debt_ceiling_bluff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An unlikely player in the war on cowboy poetry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/republican_cowboy_festival_harry_reid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/republican_cowboy_festival_harry_reid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/11/republican_cowboy_festival_harry_reid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative media are turning a Texas festival into a punchline. But Tea Partier Rick Perry has long been a fan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made a statement about the "mean-spirited" H.R. 1 bill that would eliminate the "National Endowment of the Humanities, National Endowment of the Arts." To exemplify how this bill would harm the country, Reid gave what many saw as an odd example:</p><blockquote>
<p>"The National Endowment of the Humanities is the reason we have in northern Nevada every January a <a href="http://www.westernfolklife.org/site1/index.php/25th-Gathering.html">cowboy poetry festival</a>. Had that program not been around, the tens of thousands of people who come there every year would not exist."</p>
</blockquote><p>The media jumped on this quote immediately, turning the phrase "cowboy poetry festival" into a lightening rod phrase during these budget cut debates. And on the surface, it does seem like a ridiculous choice to single out: After all, whoever heard of cowboys being poets? Apparently the only cowboys who are poets are the gay ones, according to how many "Brokeback Mountain" references have been made by conservative blogs like <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2011/03/08/priorities_reid_warns_mean-spirited_gop_cuts_could_doom_cowboy_poetry_festival">MoonBattery</a>&#160; and <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2011/03/08/priorities_reid_warns_mean-spirited_gop_cuts_could_doom_cowboy_poetry_festival">Townhall</a>, the latter of which quoted a new parody song by Mark Steyn in their analysis:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/republican_cowboy_festival_harry_reid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/republican_cowboy_festival_harry_reid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government shutdown averted as House approves $4 billion in cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/congress_passes_spending_cuts_government_shutdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/congress_passes_spending_cuts_government_shutdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/01/congress_passes_spending_cuts_government_shutdown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short-term solution grants lawmakers and White House two weeks to set spending levels through Sept. 30th]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House passed emergency short-term legislation Tuesday to cut federal spending by $4 billion and avert a government shutdown. Senate Democrats agreed to follow suit, handing Republicans an early victory in their drive to rein in government.</p><p>The bill that cleared the House on a bipartisan vote of 335-91 eliminates the threat of a shutdown on March 4, when existing funding authority expires. At the same time, it creates a compressed two-week timeframe for the White House and lawmakers to engage in what looms as a highly contentious negotiation on a follow-up bill to set spending levels through the Sept. 30 end of the fiscal year.</p><p>In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid said the short-term bill would win approval and be ready for President Barack Obama's signature within 48 hours. "We'll pass this and then look at funding the government on a long-term basis," said the Nevada Democrat.</p><p>There was no immediate reaction from the White House, which earlier in the day called publicly for an interim measure of up to five weeks.</p><p>House Republicans were more eager to draw attention to the bill that was passing with the acquiescence of the White House and Democrats than to the challenge yet ahead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/congress_passes_spending_cuts_government_shutdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/congress_passes_spending_cuts_government_shutdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP loses health care repeal vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/us_health_care_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/us_health_care_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/02/us_health_care_senate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate decides against nixing health reform 47-51, leaving matters for the Supreme Court]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Republican drive to repeal the year-old health care law ended in party-line defeat in the Senate on Wednesday, leaving the Supreme Court to render a final, unpredictable verdict on an issue steeped in political and constitutional controversy. The vote was 47-51. Moments earlier, the Senate agreed to make one relatively minor change in the law, voting to strip out a paperwork requirement for businesses.</p><p>President Barack Obama, who has vowed to veto any total repeal of his signature legislative accomplishment, has said he would accept the change. It does not directly affect health care.</p><p>Republicans conceded in advance their attempt at total repeal would fall short, but they accomplished an objective of forcing rank and file Democrats to take a position on an issue that reverberated in the 2010 campaign and may play a role in 2012.</p><p>Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said the vote marked an opportunity for Democrats who voted for the bill last year "to listen to those who have desperately been trying to get your attention."</p><p>"To say, yes, maybe my vote for this bill was a mistake, and that we can do better," McConnell said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/us_health_care_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/us_health_care_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate rules reform won&#8217;t happen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Udall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A month after every Democrat signaled support for changes to the cloture rule, everyone gives up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reasonable and popular measure with the support of a majority of senators has quietly died for no good reason, and the Senate's very first official legislative "day" of the new Congress has not even finished yet. (Did you know that the Senate's been in the middle of this one legislative day since Jan. 5? It's true!) This time, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/22/AR2011012203920.html">the victim was Senate rules reform</a>, because an attempt to deal with the unintended consequences of the previous stab at rules reform was deemed to be a violation of the rights of the minority as not at all enshrined in the Constitution, which doesn't mention filibusters.</p><p>It is actually amazing how quickly this collapsed. <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/82031/senate-dems-throw-in-the-towel">One month ago every single Senate Democrat signed a letter in support of</a> reforms of the cloture rule. Tom Udall's proposal would not have even killed the filibuster; it would've just forced 40 members to stay on the floor to sustain it, instead of one guy declaring filibuster and everyone pacing for 30 hours.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/24/senate_rules_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the GOP will force a repeal vote in the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/20/repeal_senate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It'll never get 60 votes, but forcing everyone to talk about undoing Obamacare is more fun than legislating]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting news! Having already wasted a day of everyone's time pretending to repeal the Affordable Care Act in the House of Representatives, Republicans are now set to force a vote on repeal in the Senate, where purely symbolic expressions of legislative sour grapes can take <em>weeks.</em></p><p>It was previously thought that Harry Reid would simply block a vote on repeal and that would be the end of it, but <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/gop-can-force-a-senate-vote-on-repeal/69935/">Minority Leader Mitch McConnell always finds a way.</a> He could use "Rule 14" to bring it to the floor, for example. Or -- and this is what he'll probably do -- he could attach repeal as an amendment to something likely to pass the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Dems pledge to nix health care repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/health_care_repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/health_care_repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/03/health_care_repeal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upper house leaders Harry Reid, Dick Durbin take preemptive stand against GOP-proposed destruction of health reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top Senate Democrats are warning House Speaker-elect John Boehner they'll block any Republican effort to repeal President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.</p><p>Citing better Medicare prescription coverage and other changes in the new law, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his top lieutenants say the overhaul "is too important to be treated as collateral damage in a partisan mission to repeal health care."</p><p>The letter says repeal would have "unintended consequences" for the part of the law that gradually closes the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap, as well as for other popular consumer benefits.  Also signing the letter are Sens. Dick Durbin of Illinois, Charles Schumer of New York and Patty Murray of Washington.</p><p>A copy of the letter was obtained by The Associated Press.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/health_care_repeal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/03/health_care_repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take a bow, Nancy and Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/schulman_111th_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/schulman_111th_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/24/schulman_111th_congress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason the 111th Congress is so reviled probably has something to do with how incredibly productive it's been]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With dozens of defeated and retiring members clearing out their offices, the 111th Congress finished work this week. Few are sad to see it go. According to a recent Gallup poll, only thirteen percent of Americans approve of the way Congress is doing its job; fully 83% disapprove, the most intense scorn for the national legislature in three decades. The Congressional leadership has fared little better: Promising to "fire" Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Republican insurgents seized control of the House last month, while Senate leader Harry Reid clung to his seat against all odds, thanks to the extreme behavior of his Nevada opponent. It seems they can&#8217;t get out of town too soon.</p><p>Yet the flurry of activity this past week completes the work of the most effective Congress in a generation, one that has passed more historic legislation and transformed the American political landscape more than any since the 1960s. Like the Great 89th, the Congress that Lyndon B. Johnson swept into office with his 1964 landslide, this session re-wrote many of the fundamental rules of American life: eliminating barriers to full participation of gays and lesbians, subjecting the financial sector to regulatory oversight, and constructing a national health insurance program. And like its celebrated Johnson-era predecessor, this Congress has received little thanks for its achievements.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/schulman_111th_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/schulman_111th_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year in trumped-up pseudo-scandals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/year_in_pseudoscandals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/year_in_pseudoscandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Massa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/24/year_in_pseudoscandals</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 was full of crescents in logos, candidate bribery and dastardly reverse-racism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every day, right-wing blogs and Fox News are abuzz with hysterical reports of partly or wholly invented scandals that, in their fevered imaginations, threaten to once-and-for-all destroy the Obama administration. While most of the bloggers are true believers, convinced that they're one smoking gun away from opening everyone's eyes to the criminality of the administration, on Fox they just run with whatever sounds good until they get bored with it or something more entertaining comes along. Once a pseudo-scandal ceases to be useful, it doesn't really go away forever -- Free Republic commenters will reference it until the end of time -- but most people just sort of forget about it shortly after Megyn Kelly stops mentioning it.</p><p>So I went through the archives to help remind everyone just how many silly things the conservative press got all worked up about in the year 2010. (With a couple big items left out. Everyone stopped talking about the "Ground Zero Mosque" once summer ended, but it's hardly been completely forgotten.)</p><p>
    <strong>Harry Reid said "Negro"</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/year_in_pseudoscandals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/24/year_in_pseudoscandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t kid yourself: The Senate&#8217;s still broken</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/23/senate_still_broken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/23/senate_still_broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/23/senate_still_broken</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A last-minute flurry of activity distracts us from what they couldn't get done this term]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we were all wrong about the Senate! When push finally came to shove, they ratified START, passed the food safety bill and the 9/11 first responders bill, confirmed a bunch of judges, repealed "don't ask, don't tell," and extended unemployment benefits. And they finished up their work before Christmas. I must admit, I predicted doom for a lame duck session, and I repeatedly predicted that "don't ask, don't tell" in particular would be a victim of delaying tactics and obstruction. I was completely wrong on both counts. But who could've predicted that the Senate... would work?</p><p>No one quite knows what to make of it. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/22/huffpost-hill-who-are-you_n_800517.html">"What broken system?"</a> HuffPost Hill semi-sarcastically asked. (Those who are predisposed to particularly dumb narratives decided that this sudden Senate action means <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121604846.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns">that President Obama's having</a> a <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46718.html">"comeback."</a>)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/23/senate_still_broken/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/23/senate_still_broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interior Department approves huge Nevada solar project</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/us_solar_project_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/us_solar_project_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/20/us_solar_project_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site will encompass about 2,200 acres and provide electricity to 75,000 homes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A solar energy project that will generate enough electricity for 75,000 homes in Nevada has been approved by the federal government.</p><p>Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says the Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project in Nye County is the ninth large-scale solar facility approved by the Obama administration in an effort to encourage renewable energy development on public lands in the West.</p><p>Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says construction of the 110-megawatt plant will create up to 500 jobs. Once finished, it will employ 50 in operations and management positions.</p><p>The project 13 miles northwest of Tonopah was proposed by Solar Reserve's Tonopah Solar Energy of Santa Monica, Calif.</p><p>It will encompass about 2,200 acres on land administered by the Bureau of Land Management.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/us_solar_project_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/20/us_solar_project_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate ends DADT</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/18/us_gays_in_military_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/18/us_gays_in_military_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/18/us_gays_in_military_12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President will soon sign a Congress-approved repeal of the military's 17-year ban on openly gay troops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a historic vote for gay rights, the Senate agreed on Saturday to do away with the military's 17-year ban on openly gay troops and sent President Barack Obama legislation to overturn the Clinton-era policy known as "don't ask, don't tell."</p><p>Obama was expected to sign the bill into law next week, although changes to military policy probably wouldn't take effect for at least several months. Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers must first certify that lifting the ban won't hurt troops' ability to fight. After that, the military would undergo a 60-day wait period.</p><p>Repeal would mean that, for the first time in American history, gays would be openly accepted by the armed forces and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.</p><p>More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.</p><p>"It is time to close this chapter in our history," Obama said in a statement. "It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed."</p><p>The Senate voted 65-31 to pass the bill, with eight Republicans siding with 55 Democrats and two independents in favor of repeal. The House had passed an identical version of the bill, 250-175, earlier this week.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/18/us_gays_in_military_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/18/us_gays_in_military_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim DeMint caves on bill-reading stunt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint, R-S.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn, R-Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate won't have to spend 12 hours listening to the START treaty, but spending bill fight hasn't even begun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we all know, Republicans were only delaying and obstructing action in the Senate to force a vote on the Bush tax cuts, in order to restore confidence to our nation's job-creating billionaires. Once the Senate approved the tax cut deal, Republicans immediately ... <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/jim_demints_justification.html?wprss=plum-line">threatened to bring all Senate activity to a halt</a>, for days, while also demanding that they not have to go to work on or after Christmas.</p><p>Sen. Jim DeMint wanted to do that thing where one senator can demand that bills be read aloud in their entirety. DeMint was going to give the New START treaty and the omnibus spending bill the bedtime story treatment, until, apparently, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Todd_Zwillich/status/15130979949608961">Mitch McConnell made him back down.</a> (But not before Harry Reid's press secretary <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/ManleySenate/status/15116503091249153">got in this awesome zing.</a> Hey, Harry Reid's press secretary, you wouldn't have to just impotently insult Jim DeMint's obstructionism on Twitter if your boss hadn't spent his tenure as majority leader enabling the obstruction by refusing to change archaic Senate rules allowing endless obstructionism!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; vote will happen in lame duck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/13/dadt_vote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A stand-alone bill repealing the discriminatory policy will come to the floor soon, according to a Senate source]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Susan Collins/Joe Lieberman stand-alone "don't ask, don't tell" repeal bill should come to a vote "later this week or early next week," <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/255158/hill-buzz-stand-alone-dadt-repeal-robert-costa">according to a "senior Senate aide" who spoke to the National Review's Robert Costa.</a></p><p>Meanwhile, three former service members <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/12/with_repeals_fate_uncertain_ne.html">have filed suit in federal court</a> arguing that the policy is unconstitutional. And the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network has two more lawsuits in the pipeline. Repeal via the courts <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/the_courts_will_repeal_dadt_if.html">looks more likely now</a> than it ever has before. While Republicans might enjoy that, because it would give them a chance to complain about activist judges, the Pentagon -- and lawmakers like Sen. Lieberman -- would much prefer legislative repeal to judicial repeal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid may go ahead on &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; without Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Maine Republican demands days of debate that the Senate may not have time for]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DREAM Act <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/132909-senate-postpones-consideration-of-dream-act-after-house-passage">is probably dead</a>, and now the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" hangs in the balance. This morning, things looked good. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/is_dadt_repeal_in_trouble_agai.html?wprss=plum-line">But it all may be falling apart.</a> Or not.</p><p>No one seems to know exactly where everyone stands. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/is_dadt_repeal_in_trouble_agai.html?wprss=plum-line">It looked like</a> Maine Senator Susan Collins agreed to vote for the defense authorization bill in exchange for four days of floor debate and 15 amendments, but Reid might think that's just another delaying tactic. So... Reid may hold a vote today, or this week, in which case Collins will almost certainly vote against it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/09/dadt_senate_collins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid, McConnell stay in Senate top party posts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Durbin will continue as assistant majority leader, and Arizona's Jon Kyl remains GOP whip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Democrats and Republicans have returned their respective party leaders to their posts following an election in which the top Democrat scrambled to retain his seat and the senior Republican picked up 13 new senators.</p><p>Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada kept his post, as did Kentucky Republican Mitch McConnell, the minority leader.</p><p>Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin will continue as assistant majority leader, Sen. Charles Schumer of New York will stay on as vice chairman of the Democratic conference and Sen. Patty Murray of Washington will remain conference secretary.</p><p>On the Republican side, Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona remains GOP whip, Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee continues as Republican Conference chairman and Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming remains conference vice chairman.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I&#8217;m inspired by the midterm election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/11/04/lamott_victories_of_2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell is gone, and Harry Reid isn't. Now, let's buckle up for the bumpy ride that faces us in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am awash in the afterglow of the midterms.</p><p>Perhaps "afterglow" is not exactly right. Or "awash."</p><p>Maybe I mean "profound relief." Barbara Boxer and Jerry Brown, and Michael Bennet (amazingly) in Colorado, Patty Murray hanging on, and most of all, Harry Reid, HAR-RY, HAR-RY, HAR-RY. My man. Dawg! For me, holding the Senate and Harry Reid is almost up there with the Giants winning.</p><p>So maybe they have the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/10/18/rand_paul_debate_aqua_buddha">Aqua Buddha</a>, but we have two months to go with this House, this Senate, this president. People say that 10 days or two weeks is an eternity in politics, so two months is four or five eternities. Two months is eternity-plus-plus.</p><p>And that Obama is nothing if not brilliant. This guy has had some liberal victories legislatively, and when word of these victories -- the realities of healthcare, financial reform, student loan reform, etc. -- trickles out, we will have pride and stamina again. We will experience grace again, the grace of generosity to the underdog; the grace of second winds, and psychic WD-40. The grace of unseen water wings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/05/lamott_victories_of_2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

