<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > health insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/health_insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:49:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Republican fantasy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan's new budget plan reveals how the GOP sees the world, in four easy steps]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the ways to differentiate liberals and conservatives today is to consider their respective caricatured sci-fi visions of the future. In cartoon terms, the liberal caricature is a "we're all in this together" utopia of communitarian kumbaya, while the conservative caricature is basically "Back to the Future II" -- a Biff Tannen-dominated dystopia of moral and economic decay whose only unifying ethos is thinking of -- and violently protecting -- oneself. Thus, liberals generally support stuff like universal social insurance and the social safety net, while conservatives tend to get fired up against gun control, taxes and a social safety net, and for massive military budgets.</p><p>At the rank-and-file voter level, this is, of course, a cartoon version of ideologies; many self-described liberals are hardly dreaming of turning America into a giant kibbutz while many self-described conservatives just want the government out of their face. However, at the elected official level in Washington, the conservative cartoon in particular is no comedic caricature: As Rep. Paul Ryan's new House Republican budget shows, it is an actual worldview, with specific legislative proposals in tow.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/how_republicans_think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic lawmakers: Getting birth control should be as easy as &#8220;ABC&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/democratic_lawmakers_getting_birth_control_should_be_as_easy_as_abc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/democratic_lawmakers_getting_birth_control_should_be_as_easy_as_abc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13203246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently reintroduced legislation could keep pharmacists from refusing to fill women's birth control prescriptions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the White House and the Catholic Church continue to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/catholic_bishops_reject_obamas_latest_contraception_compromise/" target="_blank">slug it out</a> over whether private, for-profit companies like Hobby Lobby should have to provide their employees with federally mandated birth control, two Democratic lawmakers are hoping to ease one roadblock to women's access to contraception: Pharmacists.</p><p>In an effort to standardize pharmacies' procedures for filling prescriptions for birth control, Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) have reintroduced the “Access to Birth Control (ABC) Act." It's the same bill the politicians tried to get through previous legislative sessions, but these two are clearly <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsSXMT0NrB4" target="_blank">Charlie-Brown-and-the-football types</a>, and are optimistically giving it another shot.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/democratic_lawmakers_getting_birth_control_should_be_as_easy_as_abc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/democratic_lawmakers_getting_birth_control_should_be_as_easy_as_abc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona bill would require immigration checks in hospitals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/arizona_bill_would_require_immigration_checks_in_hospitals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/arizona_bill_would_require_immigration_checks_in_hospitals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The relevant legislator supports a similar measure in public schools]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans have long claimed that there’s no such thing as an uninsured patient in America since anyone can just <a href="http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2012/09/24/14066565-the-gops-emergency-room-argument-never-dies?lite">go to the emergency room</a> for their health care. Sure that's  inefficient and expensive, but a proposed Arizona law might reduce some of those costs by making clear to undocumented immigrants that they’re not welcome in the state's hospitals at all.</p><p>The latest in the Arizona's proud tradition of “up yours” legislation, H.B. 2293 would require that to would require hospitals to check the immigration status of patients and <a href="http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/51leg/1r/bills/hb2293p.htm&amp;Session_ID=110">report undocumented patients to the authorities</a>. Republican State Representative Steve Smith, who’s sponsoring the bill, said that it’s a way to gauge how much Arizona is spending on care for non-Americans:</p><p>The local ABC affiliate <a href="http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_phoenix_metro/central_phoenix/a-bill-in-the-az-legislature-would-have-hospital-workers-checking-citizenship-and-calling-police">reported</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/arizona_bill_would_require_immigration_checks_in_hospitals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/arizona_bill_would_require_immigration_checks_in_hospitals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
