<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Herman Cain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/herman_cain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart to Cain, Romney and Obama: &#8220;WHAT?!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/jon_stewart_to_cain_romney_and_obama_what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/jon_stewart_to_cain_romney_and_obama_what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10409691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each of these politicians has recently made statements so outlandish as to merit a spit-take]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians are often left in the difficult position of delivering statements that fit their political narrative of choice, whether or not they conform to the realities at hand. And it can take a certain amount of <em>cojones</em> (to use the Spanish word) to make it through such moments. "But there's a fine line," as Jon Stewart pointed out on <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-december-14-2011/lowe-s-balls-of-the-week?xrs=share_copy">"The Daily Show"</a> last night, "between courage and audacity, and several public figures have recently crossed it."</p><p>Those figures would be Herman Cain, Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, each of whom made statements so outlandish in the past few days -- which deviated so far from reality, however you slice it -- that the normally inscrutable Barbara Walters would be forgiven a spit-take.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/jon_stewart_to_cain_romney_and_obama_what/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/jon_stewart_to_cain_romney_and_obama_what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart sadly bids farewell to Herman Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/jon_stewart_sadly_bids_farewell_to_herman_cain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/jon_stewart_sadly_bids_farewell_to_herman_cain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10295805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Comedy Central host hates to say goodbye to the 9-9-9 candidate -- but at least there's still Newt Gingrich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-december-5-2011/indecision-2012---the-sh-t-s-gettin--real?xrs=share_copy">Jon Stewart</a> watched Herman Cain announce on Saturday that he would suspend his campaign, the comedian didn't see what many of the rest of us saw -- a bizarre, overlong, bewildering spectacle, replete with the sort of insane antics and half-baked rhetorical devices (read: a reference to the "Pokemon" movie) that have confounded expectations and frustrated Cain's detractors time and again these past several months. No. Instead, the Comedy Central host saw the closing of a comic gold mine. Fittingly, he said goodbye to the Cain campaign with something more than a hint of sadness.</p><p>Fear not, though: Newt Gingrich is surging in the polls, and there's plenty of grist for the comedy mill in the former speaker of the House. As Stewart observed:</p><blockquote><p>That's Newt Gingrich's pitch: "I'm the thing that's been in your pantry forever." You could try your newfangled "Popped Tarts" and "Eggo'd" waffles, but if you look way back in there, there's a can of La Choy Baby Corn, a product that may or may not still be offered by the La Choy company. You don't remember buying it -- yet you don't remember ever being without it. And now you have no choice but to elect it president.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/jon_stewart_sadly_bids_farewell_to_herman_cain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/jon_stewart_sadly_bids_farewell_to_herman_cain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Herman Cain cost Ginger White</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/what_herman_cain_cost_ginger_white/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/what_herman_cain_cost_ginger_white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10292669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was White a victim of sexual politics, or a savvy player in a transactional economy? Even she doesn't seem sure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The velocity of political sex scandals these days is such that you can barely register the principals as they parade on and off the television set. It's a weird form of mercy. But even if there's no reason to pretend that Herman Cain matters anymore, it's worth stopping for a moment and pondering the peculiar story of Ginger White -- and what it tells us about transactional sex in our age.</p><p>It's fitting that the most revelatory <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/12/05/ginger-white-herman-cain-accuser-on-his-exit-his-arrogance-and-sex.html">interview</a> with White comes via Leslie Bennetts, who happens to be known both for getting celebrities to let their guard down (while at Vanity Fair) and for her exhortations for women not to leave the workforce (in her <a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/03/feminine_mistake/">book</a> "The Feminine Mistake"). And no, the major nugget isn't that White says she thought about groceries while having sex with Cain. (Cain denies that the two had a sexual relationship.) It's how lack of money made White feel powerless, and sex (which, yes, she didn't much enjoy) proved the next best commodity. That made her miserable .</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/what_herman_cain_cost_ginger_white/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/what_herman_cain_cost_ginger_white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Daily Show&#8221; tackles newest Herman Cain scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/daily_show_tackles_newest_herman_cain_allegations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/daily_show_tackles_newest_herman_cain_allegations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10275178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["After all those allegations about sexual harassment ... it's nice to see Herman Cain going the consensual route"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the sun rose Monday morning, it appeared as if the worst might have been behind the Herman Cain campaign. There had been no new allegations of sexual impropriety in weeks, and the candidate's polling numbers, while waning, were not yet toxic. Then appeared Ginger White, the woman who claims to have carried on a 13-year affair with Cain, one that continued until <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ginger-white-alleges-long-affair-with-cain/2011/11/29/gIQAPIZM8N_video.html">relatively recently</a>. Cain, for his part, acknowledges a personal relationship with White, but insisted in an <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57332384-503544/herman-cain-premptively-denies-new-sex-allegation/">interview with Wolf Blitzer</a> that it was purely platonic.</p><p>Jon Stewart examined the competing claims of Cain and White on <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-november-29-2011/indecision-2012---after-dark--oooh-yeah-edition---herman-cain-s-damaged-campaign?xrs=share_copy">"The Daily Show"</a> last night, and came to the following conclusion:</p><blockquote><p>Wow. Thirteen years, no sex. Either one of these two is lying, or Herman Cain is the worst deal closer in the history of extramarital affairs.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/daily_show_tackles_newest_herman_cain_allegations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/daily_show_tackles_newest_herman_cain_allegations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AZ state senator: Herman Cain has not sexually harassed me, even though I am attractive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/az_state_senator_herman_cain_has_not_sexually_harassed_me_even_though_i_am_attractive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/az_state_senator_herman_cain_has_not_sexually_harassed_me_even_though_i_am_attractive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10273091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One (crazy) woman's defense of the scandal-plagued candidate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arizona state Sen. Lori Klein is Herman Cain's Arizona state chairman and also the sinking candidate's single best asset. If I were him, I'd immediately start booking Klein on cable TV as a campaign surrogate, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57332967-503544/herman-cain-reassessing-candidacy-after-affair-claim/?tag=cbsContent;cbsCarousel">because her impressive spin work is right now being sadly wasted.</a></p><blockquote><p>Lori Klein, an Arizona state Senator and Cain's Arizona state chairman, told CBS News she stands by Cain.</p>
<p>Says she has known him for 12 years and he's "never been anything but a gentlemen - and I am not an unattractive woman."</p></blockquote><p>That's a slam-dunk argument, right there. And she's not even done!</p><blockquote><p>Klein suggested that if Cain is innocent he should sue White for libel and went on to attack the media for digging up the allegations. She also said that in politics, "we want a virgin to do a hooker's job."</p></blockquote><p>Yes! Herman Cain is a hooker. But a hooker with a heart of gold, and the constitution to resist harassing or assaulting Lori Klein, a noted attractive woman!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/az_state_senator_herman_cain_has_not_sexually_harassed_me_even_though_i_am_attractive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/29/az_state_senator_herman_cain_has_not_sexually_harassed_me_even_though_i_am_attractive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And then there were two</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/and_then_there_were_two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/and_then_there_were_two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10270463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Cain train off the tracks, Newt Gingrich emerges as the official Not Mitt Romney. Can he win?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herman Cain's campaign was already going down under the weight of sexual harassment charges, as well as his own foreign and domestic policy ignorance. But the news that <a href="http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/dpp/news/ginger-white-claims-affair-herman-cain-20111127-es">an Atlanta woman says she had a 13-year affair</a> with the married Cain officially makes him just a punch line, not a presidential candidate. (Yes, some people can be both, but not Cain.)</p><p>We've been waiting for months for the race to narrow itself to Mitt Romney and the not-Mitt candidate, and it looks like it's going to be Newt Gingrich. His strong debate performance last week combined with the endorsement of the Manchester Union Leader this weekend means he's unlikely to rise and fall in GOP polling as rapidly as Cain or earlier not-Mitt candidates Rick Perry or Michele Bachmann. No one else is likely to rise to challenge him. Huntsman is too moderate (and Mormon) to be not-Mitt, and Ron Paul is too eccentric for Tea Party Astroturf types to get behind. Rick Santorum is Rick Santorum.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/and_then_there_were_two/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/and_then_there_were_two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herman Cain doesn&#8217;t eat &#8220;sissy&#8221; pizza</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/herman_cain_doesnt_eat_sissy_pizza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/herman_cain_doesnt_eat_sissy_pizza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10223547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP candidate measures a man in terms of sausage and pepperoni -- and with lame, emasculating words]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the spectrum of offensive terms, it's not high-threat-level incendiary. It's not the sort of word you'd have to sprinkle with dashes in print, or refer to as "the s-word" on television. But here's the update for those of you who didn't already figure it out: At this point in human history, calling anything "sissy" makes you look like a dumb bully. Which brings us to Herman Cain.</p><p>We already know that Herman Cain is totally butch. Not so butch that he'd need to <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/67551.html">settle any sexual harassment</a> claims by the ladies, of course! Ha ha! But definitely masculine enough to understand the true measure of a man – not in the achievements he attains, not in the people whose lives he makes better, but by the toppings on his pizza. That's why, in <a href="http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/201111/herman-cain-interview-alan-richman-chris-heath-devin-gordon?currentPage=1">an interview with GQ,</a>  Herman Cain, pizza tycoon, <a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/catherine_forsythe/2011/11/13/herman_cain_on_why_you_dont_have_a_job">blamer of the poor</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DrSEyjBj1w">viral video star, </a>and man who <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/gloria_cain_stands_by_her_man/ ">"totally respects women,"</a> philosophized about culinary sex roles.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/herman_cain_doesnt_eat_sissy_pizza/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/herman_cain_doesnt_eat_sissy_pizza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gloria Cain stands by her man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/gloria_cain_stands_by_her_man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/gloria_cain_stands_by_her_man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10221677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herman Cain's wife defends her husband as "old school." But the line between protector and harasser can be thin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, on the same day that Gloria Cain <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/2011/11/15/herman-cains-wife-stands-her-husband-against-sex-harassment-allegations-thats-not-person-  ">stood by her man</a> on Fox News against allegations of sexual harassment and assault, GQ <a href="http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/201111/herman-cain-interview-alan-richman-chris-heath-devin-gordon?printable=true&amp;currentPage=3">published</a> an interview with her husband in which he used the word "manly" six times, to refer to pizza with meat on it. These two interviews were intimately connected.</p><p>Speaking to Greta Van Susteren, the kindly Mrs. Cain said she didn't recognize the man described by his accusers, that her husband "totally respects women." That is to say, "If you understand what old school is, of that generation where men still wanted to open the doors for women, and if we're walking along the street, he wants me to walk on the outside, next to the curb. It's not just me, it's any woman he's walking with because old-school people think they're supposed to be women's protectors."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/gloria_cain_stands_by_her_man/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/gloria_cain_stands_by_her_man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Cain&#8217;s accuser act ethically?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/did_cains_accuser_act_ethically/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/did_cains_accuser_act_ethically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10190284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tricky law and politics of confidentiality agreements]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sexual harassment and assault accusations against Herman Cain raise an issue often in the news these days: the propriety of confidential agreements. From the facts the public knows, the National Restaurant Association, when it was run by Cain in the 1990s, entered into confidentiality agreements with several female employees who claimed he groped them and were paid to keep quiet about it. Confidentiality agreements have also figured in the controversy over the Catholic Church's long-standing practices of requiring confidentiality agreements when paying lay complainants for their claims against predatory priests.</p><p>Are confidentiality agreements a good thing? They certainly encourage settlement. Most civil litigation, over 95 percent by most reliable estimates, concludes in a settlement. The risks, stress and costs of litigation encourage settling cases. The courts also encourage settlements as measures for judicial economy. And most settlements – in and out of courts – end with confidentiality clauses, which the parties sign, agreeing to keep the charges and settlements confidential. The motive for the defendant is to pay a price to keep a contested charge private, whether or not it is true. Cynics call that practice extortion; realists call it the price of doing business.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/did_cains_accuser_act_ethically/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/did_cains_accuser_act_ethically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The boyfriend defense</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/the_boyfriend_defense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/the_boyfriend_defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10184710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are single women less credible when charging sexual harassment?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon Bialek, the woman who went public to accuse Herman Cain of sexual harassment and assault, peppered her prepared statement with a dozen strategic references to her former boyfriend to drive home the point that the Republican presidential candidate's advances had been unwanted.  In a seven-minute statement, Bialek mentioned her boyfriend every 40 seconds.</p><p>The boyfriend was the reason she called up Cain to use him as a possible contact for a job. It was he who suggested she meet Cain, in person, thereby explaining why she would be alone having drinks and dinner with a strange man. This boyfriend (a doctor!) was the plausible explanation for her room upgrade at the Capitol Hilton. He was the reason she rebuffed Cain's alleged sexual overtures.</p><p>Bialek and her legal team wanted no confusion about that fact that she was in a serious relationship and not looking for a date with Cain, a married man who has denied the allegations against him.  But does a woman need a husband or boyfriend to be taken seriously when bringing allegations of sexual misconduct?  Would Bialak’s account of meeting Cain draw more doubt or scrutiny had she not had a knight in shining armor waiting for her at home?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/the_boyfriend_defense/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/the_boyfriend_defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RedState blogger has amazing Herman Cain theory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10184623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the media reporting on the Penn State scandal to hurt conservatives? One insane person thinks so]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the midst of <a href="http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2011/11/09/ohio-obamacare-vote-is-a-perfect-illustration-of-pelosi%E2%80%99s-radically-out-of-touch-mental-state/">an otherwise routine post</a> celebrating Ohio voters' decision to symbolically demonstrate their disapproval of a healthcare reform rule that has yet to go into effect and bemoaning the media's conspiracy of silence on said decision, RedState diarist Dan Perrin makes this totally sane and reasonable observation:</p><blockquote><p>So, this morning, were the lead stories on television that Nancy Pelosi, whose belittling and famous “Are you serious? Are you serious?” response to being asked about the challenge to the ObamaCare individual mandate, was the perfect illustration of her radical and out-of-touch mental state — and that she is as out of touch as former President Bush was when he expressed amazement at grocery store price scanners?</p>
<p>Uh, no. <strong>(The media’s obsession with the Penn State sex scandal can be explained by the fact they think it will hurt Herman Cain.)</strong></p></blockquote><p>Emphasis very much mine, because, <em>wow.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/redstate_blogger_has_amazing_herman_cain_theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herman Cain&#8217;s &#8220;blame the liberal media&#8221; tactic fails, spectacularly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/herman_cains_blame_the_liberal_media_tactic_fails_spectacularly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/herman_cains_blame_the_liberal_media_tactic_fails_spectacularly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10184471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Block embarrasses his candidate on national TV by alleging a conspiracy that immediately falls apart]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Block, Herman Cain's chief of staff and a complete idiot, went on Hannity last night to finally put this "multiple credible accusations of sexual harassment" issue to bed, so to speak. He <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/11/09/mark_block_schmuck_or_liar_.html">came prepared with a stunning revelation:</a></p><blockquote><p>BLOCK: Karen Kraushaar had come out as one of the women. And we’ve come to find out her son works at Politico, the organization that originally put the story out.</p>
<p>HANNITY: Have you confirmed that? I've been hearing that all day, rumors about that. You've confirmed that.</p>
<p>BLOCK: We've confirmed it that he does indeed work at Politico, and that's his mother, yes.</p></blockquote><p>See? It's all a liberal media conspiracy, because the son of one of the five women to have accused Herman Cain of inappropriate behavior works in some sort of capacity at the news organization that originally ran the story reporting that Cain had been accused of sexual harassment (a story that was proven completely true shortly following its publication, meaning that even if it had been a plot, it was still a plot based on complete factual accuracy).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/herman_cains_blame_the_liberal_media_tactic_fails_spectacularly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/herman_cains_blame_the_liberal_media_tactic_fails_spectacularly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colbert sticks with, then sours on Herman Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/colbert_sticks_with_then_sours_on_herman_cain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/colbert_sticks_with_then_sours_on_herman_cain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Colbert Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10183832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Comedy Central host demonstrates how the newest set of allegations could sink the Cain campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many have marveled at Herman Cain's resilience this past week and a half. Even facing a series of sexual harassment accusations, the Republican hopeful surged to his <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/defiant-cain-raises-big-1215021.html">single strongest day</a> of fundraising ever last week, and continued to best Mitt Romney in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cain-rises-in-post-abc-poll-despite-scandal-most-republicans-dismiss-allegations/2011/11/04/gIQApcgSlM_story.html">national polls</a>. Stephen Colbert did his best to illustrate the mindset of a typical Cain supporter on <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/401789/november-08-2011/indecision-2012---herman-cain-won-t-be-stopped?xrs=share_copy">his show</a> last night -- and to highlight the source of the candidate's durability. More importantly, though, Colbert also demonstrated how Sharon Bialek's <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/herman-cain-accuser-sharon-bialek-is-a-liar/">specific, unsettling allegations</a> could lose Cain all of his momentum, and ultimately sink his campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/colbert_sticks_with_then_sours_on_herman_cain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/colbert_sticks_with_then_sours_on_herman_cain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharon Bialek, meet the right-wing hit machine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/sharon_bialek_meet_the_right_wing_hit_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/sharon_bialek_meet_the_right_wing_hit_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Allred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon bialek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10173137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh and Dick Morris begin sliming Herman Cain's accuser, but not every prominent conservative follows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing was clear from Sharon Bialek's media tour of the past 24 hours: She knew what she was getting herself into.</p><p>Bialek, the public face of sexual harassment charges against GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain, told CNN's Piers Morgan last night that: "There's going to be a lot of backlash and I'm going to have to suffer through that and I'm sure I'm going to be portrayed as different things. I'm willing to handle it. I'm a tough girl."</p><p>On NBC's "Today," she <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/45204146#45204146  ">recalled</a> her boyfriend telling her that if she said publicly that Cain made unwelcome advances, "It's gonna be one of those he-said she-said things." But Bialek insisted that the focus belonged on Cain, not her. "It's not about me. I'm not the one running for president." She repeated on every show that she wasn't getting paid and neither was attorney Gloria Allred.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/sharon_bialek_meet_the_right_wing_hit_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/sharon_bialek_meet_the_right_wing_hit_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>166</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herman Cain&#8217;s dubious liberal media conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/herman_cains_dubious_liberal_media_conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/herman_cains_dubious_liberal_media_conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10177398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Daily Show" dissects the faulty logic of the presidential candidate and his defenders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Herman Cain saga escalated yesterday, as a woman named Sharon Bialek surfaced to level charges against the presidential candidate at once both more specific and serious than prior accusations. In response, Cain has employed a strategy not just of strongly denying sexual harassment allegations, but also of lambasting the mainstream media that continues to propagate them.</p><p>That tactic -- suggesting a liberal media conspiracy set on unjustly discrediting the candidate -- is one enthusiastically adopted by conservative pundits. The only problem, as <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-november-7-2011/indecision-2012---he-said--she-said--she-said--she-said--she-said?xrs=share_copy">"The Daily Show"</a> pointed out last night, is that their arguments don't add up to a very convincing case.</p><p><strong>Part 1:</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/herman_cains_dubious_liberal_media_conspiracy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/herman_cains_dubious_liberal_media_conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The third Koch brother?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_third_koch_brother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_third_koch_brother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans for Prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10162050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facing charges Koch groups illegally funded his campaign, Herman Cain says he's their "brother from another mother"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Maddow spent a lot of time Thursday night on what is potentially the most damaging Herman Cain scandal: charges that his campaign manager, Smokin' Mark Block, used corporate money donated to Prosperity USA to pay Cain campaign expenses. Prosperity USA is affiliated with Americans for Prosperity, the conservative corporate advocacy group funded by Charles and David Koch.</p><p>Cain, of course, strenuously denies the allegations of sexual harassment against him, but when it comes to charges that he's too close to the rapacious Kochs, he pleads guilty. “I am the Koch brothers' brother from another mother,” Cain told an Americans for Prosperity summit Friday, insisting he was “very proud” to know the right-wing Kochs, who run oil and gas behemoth Koch Industries.</p><p>But now Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics is asking for a probe of the ties between Americans for Prosperity and the Cain campaign. <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/noquarter/state-firms-cash-to-herman-cain-may-breach-federal-campaign-tax-laws-132898423.html">The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported this week</a> that Block used Prosperity USA funds to pay for Cain's travel and other campaign expenses. Block headed Prosperity USA before he joined Cain, and before that he was with Americans for Prosperity. Back before that, of course, he ran a Wisconsin judicial campaign that went so afoul of campaign law Block found himself barred from politics in Wisconsin for three years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_third_koch_brother/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_third_koch_brother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The one break that Herman Cain has caught this week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_one_break_that_herman_cain_has_caught_this_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_one_break_that_herman_cain_has_caught_this_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a rough week for the GOP, but damning details about his alleged conduct have been elusive -- so far]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of his best efforts, Herman Cain has managed to catch at least one break this week: As his sexual harassment scandal enters its fifth full day, we still have only the vaguest idea of what, exactly, he was accused of when he ran the National Restaurant Association in the late 1990s. We know the complaints dealt with alleged sexual harassment, but that could mean ... almost anything.</p><p>This lack of damning details has so far allowed Cain to enjoy support from some of the right's most influential voices, like Rush Limbaugh, who once again <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/11/03/cain_didn_t_handle_this_right">used his show on Thursday</a> to paint Cain as the victim of "a largely irrelevant media ambush." And so far, there's been no drop-off in his support among Republican voters. An ABC News/Washington Post poll <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/11/cain-shows-initial-resilience-in-the-face-of-controversy/">released this morning</a> finds him at 23 percent in the national GOP horse race, just one point behind Mitt Romney (24 percent).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_one_break_that_herman_cain_has_caught_this_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_one_break_that_herman_cain_has_caught_this_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP elite delaying inevitable Romney acceptance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Party insiders will almost certainly settle on the flip-flopping ex-governor, but they're taking their time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Bernstein <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/fresh-signs-that-mitt-romney-may-win-gop-nomination/2011/03/28/gIQA8mBJgM_blog.html">writes today</a> that Mitt Romney is still looking like a good bet to win the GOP nomination, based on Mark Blumenthal's "Political Outsiders" survey (which, contrary to its name, actually polls political insiders in early primary states).</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/02/mitt-romney-frontrunner-undecided-gop-power-outsiders_n_1070255.html?1320235599&amp;ncid=edlinkusaolp00000008">The survey says</a> Romney is tied with Perry for public endorsements from "influential Republicans," and he's barely beating Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich (!) in the "potential support" race, but as Bernstein says, the point is that Romney has a much better shot of winning elite support <em>in the future</em> than any other candidate.</p><blockquote><p>But the key for Romney isn’t having support now; it’s whether or not he’s ultimately acceptable to most party groups and leaders. And here, the news is very, very good for the former Massachusetts governor. Of the entire group, while 23% have already endorsed another candidate, only another 10% say they have “no chance” of supporting him for the nomination.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Daily Show&#8221; takes on Ann Coulter&#8217;s race-baiting logic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/the_daily_show_takes_on_ann_coulters_race_baiting_logic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/the_daily_show_takes_on_ann_coulters_race_baiting_logic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart and co. extend one of the pundit's controversial statements to its logical extreme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most by now are probably familiar with Ann Coulter's declaration, when discussing the Herman Cain sexual harassment debacle earlier this week, that "our blacks are so much better than their blacks." Most probably weren't all that shocked to hear this sort of race-baiting from Coulter, who's made a lucrative career dispensing right-wing vitriol. Most probably just ignored her uncouth remarks and moved on.</p><p>Still, just in case you were looking for a more complete exegesis of the logic behind Coulter's statement, Jon Stewart, along with his "Daily Show" correspondents, <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-2-2011/conservative-minorities-vs--liberal-minorities?xrs=share_copy">extended the argument</a> to its logical extreme last night.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/the_daily_show_takes_on_ann_coulters_race_baiting_logic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/the_daily_show_takes_on_ann_coulters_race_baiting_logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the right finally turning on Herman Cain?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/is_the_right_finally_turning_on_herman_cain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/is_the_right_finally_turning_on_herman_cain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As allegations mount, some conservatives are going wobbly. Is the persecution narrative in danger?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion that the Herman Cain sexual harassment saga amounts to a smear perpetrated by liberals and their media allies because they feel threatened by prominent black conservatives has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/sean_hannity_will_make_herman_cain_the_victim_of_a_liberal_smear_no_matter_what/">ridiculous</a> since the story broke. But it has nonetheless been <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67294.html">promoted relentlessly</a> by many of the right's most popular commentators. That may be changing, though.</p><p>Wednesday brought several new developments that expanded the story's scope, prompting some on the right to express new doubts about whether Cain might actually have engaged in improper behavior and reinforcing criticism of the improvisational, self-defeating way he's handled this entire mess.</p><p>The day's biggest news was that the number of women who allegedly were subject to troubling conduct by Cain grew from two to five. First came a report that a woman who worked at the National Restaurant Association under Cain in the late 1990s <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/ap-exclusive-third-worker-1215150.html">is now alleging </a>that he made "inappropriate" remarks to her and asked her to join him at his apartment. The woman, who was tracked down and granted anonymity by the Associated Press, said she never filed a formal complaint against Cain but was aware of one other NRA employee who did.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/is_the_right_finally_turning_on_herman_cain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/is_the_right_finally_turning_on_herman_cain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

