<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Hillary Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/hillary_clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:11:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stop comparing Wendy Davis to the Khaleesi!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/stop_comparing_wendy_davis_to_the_khaleesi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/stop_comparing_wendy_davis_to_the_khaleesi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tami taylor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[khaleesi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daenerys targaryen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leslie knope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...Or Leslie Knope, or Tami Taylor. The filibustering Texas state senator deserves to be discussed on her own terms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy Davis' filibuster against a restrictive abortion bill on the floor of the Texas Legislature last week immediately became the stuff of legend -- and though Democrats' battle in Texas continues, Davis' admirers have taken her crusade from the realm of the political into the stuff of pop culture.</p><p>Comparisons between Davis and just about every popular female television character of the last few years have sprung up across the Internet -- most commonly, to Emilia Clarke's Daenerys Targaryen from "Game of Thrones," Amy Poehler's Leslie Knope from "Parks and Recreation," and Connie Britton's Tami Taylor from "Friday Night Lights."</p><p>The last one makes sense, sort of -- Davis and Taylor both are Texan women with teased heads of blond hair. It was little wonder that fans of "Friday Night Lights" started comparing the two even as the filibuster was going on.</p><p>[embedtweet id="349640240702566401"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="349668289833738241"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="349688861959524352"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="349701931301740546"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="349716526577889280"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="349744540820832257"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/stop_comparing_wendy_davis_to_the_khaleesi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/stop_comparing_wendy_davis_to_the_khaleesi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives to Hillary: OK, but please no Lanny Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Penn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lanny Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The left seems largely happy with Hillary now, because she can beat Republicans. Just please no wars or Mark Penn!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/netroots-nation-2013-hillary-clinton-93192.html" target="_blank">story this weekend</a> on Politico about the feelings progressives have toward Hillary Clinton, titled "Progressives at Netroots Nation 2013: Hillary Clinton must win us over." Within it, the "more than two dozen" attendees interviewed offer some hesitations about going with another Clinton in 2016 and her still-hawkish foreign policy. But as the author of the piece admits, "the backing of progressives appears to be Clinton’s to lose."</p><p>Another NBC News <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/22/19092548-liberal-activists-warm-to-hillary-clinton-for-president" target="_blank">story on precisely the same topic</a> comes away with a similar conclusion: "progressives are ready to give her another shot."</p><p>Progressives are basically fine with Hillary Clinton taking the 2016 nomination. There! Settled.</p><p>And why shouldn't they be? As Markos Moulitsas puts it, “The fact that she makes 2016 uninteresting makes that attractive." Yeah, that's about all you need, too. She would win. And you know who's a good nominee to go with, in general, in politics? The one who would <em>win the election</em>. Progressives overall might prefer, say, an Elizabeth Warren or Martin O'Malley for the nominee, but they likely won't run if Hillary Clinton runs, so whatever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/progressives_to_hillary_please_no_lanny_davis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary must own 2014</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter's a nice start. But if she wants to get serious about 2016, she needs to get involved in the 2014 midterms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If successfully running a presidential campaign was as easy as launching a kickass Twitter account, Hillary Clinton would be unbeatable in 2016. Her widely hailed Twitter debut was perfect, embracing her public and private roles – wife, mom, senator, Secretary of State – sending up the sexist mockery she’s endured -- “hair icon,” “pantsuit aficionado” – and leaving the next entry in her bio a teasing “TBD.”</p><p>Her cheeky Twitter debut told me two almost contradictory things: Hillary Clinton is having an enormously good time with this phase in her life, and she’s planning on running for president.</p><p>Obviously a winning campaign will be way harder than launching her Twitter presence, but let’s give her credit for a bold first step. Still, I was thrilled by Clinton’s sure-footed Twitter move – and then I was kind of horrified by how thrilled I was, particularly as I saw a comparable giddiness among liberals and the media (and no, they’re not the same thing.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/hillary_must_own_2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton is on Twitter and it&#8217;s amazing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clinton_is_on_twitter_and_its_amazing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clinton_is_on_twitter_and_its_amazing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texts from hillary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get ready for #tweetsfromhillary
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not easy to stand out among the bazillion other folks out there tweeting nonstop into the void. Even a celebrity joining the world of social media rarely gets more than a wearily pleased, "Oh, hey, <a href="https://twitter.com/josswhedon">Joss Whedon finally made it to Twitter."</a> But people, <a href="https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton">Hillary Clinton just got on Twitter</a> and WON THE INTERNET.</p><p>Showing a thoroughly cheeky feel for exactly who her crowd here is, Ms. Clinton showed up on Twitter -- mere weeks after her husband Bill got on board -- Monday afternoon. The former president quickly welcomed her with a lighthearted query, <a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/04/26/bill-clinton-officially-joins-twitter/ ">"Does @Twitter have a family share plan?"</a> He then said, "Great to be here with @HillaryClinton &amp; @ChelseaClinton. Looking forward to #tweetsfromhillary." Chelsea, meanwhile, chimed in with an adorable <a href="https://twitter.com/billclinton/status/344135209010216960">"Welcome Mom!"</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clinton_is_on_twitter_and_its_amazing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/hillary_clinton_is_on_twitter_and_its_amazing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice 1, Rand Paul 0</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/susan_rice_1_rand_paul_0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/susan_rice_1_rand_paul_0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP’s Benghazi scapegoat gets a promotion, and clueless Paul sacrifices his moral authority by lying about her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jon_karl_makes_things_worse/">When ABC News published doctored emails</a> about the development of Benghazi “talking points,” and the White House countered by releasing the originals, which told a very different story, the two versions agreed on at least one fact: U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice had nothing to do with the controversial description of the Benghazi attack that she shared in her five fateful Sunday show appearances last Sept. 17.</p><p>I thought at the time that Rice deserved an apology from Republicans who savaged her, once the truth about the talking points came out, but of course one never came. (<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/senator-susan-rice-deserves-be-subpoenaed-not-apology_728873.html">Sen. Lindsey Graham countered by saying she "deserved to be subpoenaed" instead.</a>) Now she’s gotten the next best thing: a promotion to National Security Adviser, once Tom Donilon leaves the job in July. The position needs no confirmation by the Senate, so Rice’s GOP critics have nothing to say about her new role.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/susan_rice_1_rand_paul_0/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/susan_rice_1_rand_paul_0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>306</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton memoir shows up on Amazon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/hillary_clinton_memoir_shows_up_on_amazon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/hillary_clinton_memoir_shows_up_on_amazon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary clinton memoir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The book, with thoughts on "challenges of the 21st century," is set to come out in June 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It'll be the best beach read of 2014.</p><p>Hillary Clinton's untitled new memoir, to be released June 1, 2014, now has <a href="http://www.amazon.com/New-Memoir-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton/dp/1476751447/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1369422226&amp;sr=8-1">its own Amazon page</a> where fans of the former Secretary of State can preorder the book at a steep discount from the hardcover list price of $40. The Simon and Schuster tome, listed as "New Memoir," is 320 pages and features what may be placeholder art (the same photograph Clinton uses on her <a href="http://hillaryclintonoffice.com/">official Web page</a>) on its cover. As of right now, the book is ranked #196,490 among hardcovers on Amazon. It is likely to rise over the course of the next year.</p><p>Here's the synopsis provided on Amazon:</p><div id="ps-content"> <div> <div id="outer_postBodyPS"> <blockquote> <div id="postBodyPS">Hillary Clinton's candid reflections about the key moments during her time as Secretary of State, as well as her thoughts about how to navigate the challenges of the 21st century.</div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/hillary_clinton_memoir_shows_up_on_amazon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/hillary_clinton_memoir_shows_up_on_amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan: &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; if there was a Benghazi cover-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We just need to investigate this for the sake of good government," he added]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on this week's episode of Fox News Sunday that he does not know whether there was a "cover-up" related to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, but the investigation needs to run its course.</p><p>"Those of us who have had the briefings, seen the videos, know there was no protest involved," Ryan said. "To suggest afterwards that this was the result of a spontaneous protest, we now know is not the case. So the burden of proof here is on the administration's side. Why did they continue to push this kind of a story when they knew nearly immediately afterwards that that was not the case?"</p><p>Host Chris Wallace asked Ryan if he thinks the White House "purposely misled" the American people to help win the election. "I don't know the answer to that question," Ryan replied. "Rather make a conclusion before an investigation has been completed, we just need to investigate this for the sake of good government."</p><p>As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/19/paul-ryan-benghazi_n_3302582.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">The Huffington Post</a> points out, this is a slightly different approach from the one Ryan has been taking:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Guantanamo affects China: Our human rights hypocrisies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/how_guantanamo_affects_china_our_human_rights_hypocrisies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/how_guantanamo_affects_china_our_human_rights_hypocrisies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. uses the ideology of human rights as a political tool, embracing -- or ignoring -- it when convenient]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Treasury Timothy Geithner were poised to make a rare double visit to China for a high-level strategic and economic dialogue. The presence of both of these key cabinet officials at a delicate moment in the relationship between the two countries marked the importance of the issues. For once, economic interdependence and geopolitics were on the agenda at the same moment.</p><p>But on April 22, in the tiny village of Dongshigu in the eastern Shandong province, something happened that would eclipse the visit. Chen Guangcheng, a blind dissident lawyer-activist, managed to scale a high wall to escape the building where he had been under house arrest for two years. Chen broke his foot in the process, yet over the next several days, with the help of other activists, he managed to make his way four hundred miles to Beijing, where he was taken into the U.S. embassy. On April 27, when he was inside the embassy, a YouTube video was posted in which Chen informed Premier Wen Jiabao that he had escaped and demanding punishment for the local officials who had detained him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/how_guantanamo_affects_china_our_human_rights_hypocrisies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/how_guantanamo_affects_china_our_human_rights_hypocrisies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: GOP mischaracterized Benghazi emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS News reports that the initially leaked emails have different quotes from the White House emails]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS News is reporting that leaked versions of the Benghazi emails sent out by Republicans had key differences from those released by the White House earlier this week.</p><p>The version of the emails initially sent out last Friday purported to show that the State Department and the White House gave input into the talking points issued by the CIA following the attacks on the U.S. consulate. But on Wednesday the White House released 100 pages of emails that contradict this conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57584947/wh-benghazi-emails-have-different-quotes-than-earlier-reported/">CBS News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>On Friday, Republicans leaked what they said was a quote from Rhodes: "We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don't want to undermine the FBI investigation."</p> <p>But it turns out that in the actual email, Rhodes did not mention the State Department.</p> <p>It read: "We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who doctored a White House email?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/who_doctored_a_white_house_email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/who_doctored_a_white_house_email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN appears to have undermined a scoop that damaged the White House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was ABC News used by someone with an ax to grind against the State Department? It looks possible. A key email in its <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/exclusive-benghazi-talking-points-underwent-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-references/">“scoop”</a> that the administration’s “talking points” on Benghazi had been changed a dozen times came from White House national security communications adviser Ben Rhodes. It seemed to confirm that the White House wanted the talking points changed to protect all agencies’ interests, “including those of the State Department,” in the words of the email allegedly sent by Rhodes.</p><p><a href="http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/cnn-exclusive-white-house-email-contradicts-benghazi-leaks/">But CNN’s Jake Tapper reveals</a> that Rhodes’ email didn’t mention the State Department, and doesn’t even seem to implicitly reference it. The email as published by Karl differs significantly from the original obtained by Tapper.</p><p>According to ABC’s Jonathan Karl, Rhodes weighed in after State Department’s Victoria Nuland, who expressed concerns about the way the talking points might hurt “my building's leadership.” ABC quotes Rhodes saying:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/who_doctored_a_white_house_email/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/who_doctored_a_white_house_email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP reprises &#8217;90s scandal playbook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Nuland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With zero self-awareness, Beltway conservatives and journalists are salivating over a return to Clinton scandals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never said “Who cares?” about how four Americans died in Benghazi. Sen. John McCain either misspoke or flat-out lied about that on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.</p><p>“Remember when she said, ‘well who cares how this happened,’ in a rather emotional way?” McCain asked guest host Martha Raddatz. “A lot of people care.” It’s too bad Raddatz didn’t tell the senator that no, she didn’t remember that – because Clinton never said it.</p><p>Remarkably, I’ve seen no one follow up on McCain’s misstatement today either. (I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong.) Instead, reporters are breathlessly parsing each new GOP charge on Benghazi (while also decrying the very real abuse of the IRS overscrutinizing the tax-exempt status of conservative groups.)  The National Journal’s Ron Fournier tweeted “<a href="   https://twitter.com/ron_fournier/status/333976318981062656">Welcome to the 90s,”</a> with no apparent irony or self-awareness about the role of the media in ginning up that decade of phony scandals that paralyzed our last popular second-term Democratic president, Bill Clinton.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Gates: I would have handled Benghazi the same way</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criticism of the military response shows a "cartoonish impression of military capabilities," Gates said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that when it comes to military response to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, he doesn't believe the would have acted any differently. "Frankly, had I been in the job at the time, I think my decisions would have been just as theirs were," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation." "We don't have a ready force standing by in the Middle East...and so getting somebody there in a timely way would have been very difficult, if not impossible."</p><p>Gates, who was appointed by George W. Bush and kept on during President Obama's first term, continued that he wouldn't have "approved sending an aircraft, a single aircraft, over Benghazi under those circumstances."</p><p>"It's sort of a cartoonish impression of military capabilities and military forces," Gates added. "The one thing that our forces are noted for is planning and preparation before we send people in harm's way, and there just wasn't time to do that."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/robert_gates_i_would_have_handled_benghazi_the_same_way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benghazi depositions to examine Clinton&#8217;s role</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Chiefs of Staff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House oversight panel hopes to clarify whether she directed the response to the nighttime attacks in Libya]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="yui_3_8_1_24_1368448361064_217">WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican chairman of the House oversight panel is asking a veteran diplomat and a former chairman of the Joints Chief of Staff for sworn testimony about their investigation into the deaths of four Americans at a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya.</p><p id="yui_3_8_1_24_1368448361064_204">Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, planned on Monday to seek depositions from retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and retired Adm. Mike Mullen. Issa, who is leading Republicans' investigations into the attacks on a State Department consulate last September, said he wants to know with whom the pair spoke to reach their conclusion that then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton did not direct the response to the pair of nighttime attacks in Libya.</p><p id="yui_3_8_1_24_1368448361064_215">"This is a failure, it needs to be investigated. Our committee can investigate. Now, Ambassador Pickering, his people and he refused to come before our committee," Issa said Sunday.</p><p>Pickering, sitting next to Issa during an appearance on one Sunday show, disputed the chairman's account and said that he was willing to testify before the committee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Salter: &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to think of any other women on the spur of the moment here&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Salter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked about how his characters refer to women, he names a Clinton and a Kardashian, then can't remember any others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 87, James Salter is having perhaps the best year of his career. His first novel in three decades, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400043131//?tag=saloncom08-20">"All That Is,"</a> has brought rave reviews and even a <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/04/15/130415fa_fact_paumgarten">New Yorker profile.</a> It's heady, late-life success for a novelist mostly revered as a writer's writer for books like "Light Years" and "A Sport and a Pastime."</p><p>But this weekend on NPR's "All Things Considered," the latest stop on his celebratory media tour, Salter was asked by host Arun Rath about his women characters -- and he gave what might be as bizarre an answer as has any male writer these days, suddenly faced with direct questions about literature and gender that they might not have been asked before.</p><p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=182249161">Here's the transcript:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go away, 2016 presidential obsession!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The media fixate on the presidential race while sequester cuts fester and real questions about Libya go unanswered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter that Sen. Rand Paul can’t even spell Hillary Clinton’s name right <a href="https://twitter.com/SenRandPaul/status/332857889498742784">on Twitter</a>, as he insists the Benghazi killings mean she "should never hold high office again.” No matter that the former secretary of state isn’t officially seeking high office again. Despite it all, everyone is<em> positive</em> that Paul is running for president against Clinton, and so his trip to Iowa this week is big news.</p><p>So was Chris Christie's lap band surgery; it’s <em>obvious</em> what that means. Joe Biden tells Rolling Stone he spends four to five hours a day with President Obama -- we all know <em>why</em>. The attempted rehabilitation of George W. Bush was all about the presidential ambitions of his brother Jeb. Sen. Marco Rubio’s immigration reform proposals are covered almost exclusively in terms of what they mean for his 2016 chances, not for U.S. immigration policy. And the White House schemes of freshman Sen. Ted Cruz, instead of being a laughable footnote in stories about his radicalism, are instead headline news everywhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/go_away_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary in the (White) House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We elected a black man. Are we ready to elect a woman?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" /></a><br /> I DREAM of Iowa.</p><p>Hillary Clinton has just made her first public appearances since resigning as Secretary of State, and I am enthusiastic about her presumed candidacy; it’s making me dream of Iowa. I long to go there to work on electing the first woman president.</p><p>I watched Barack Obama there last November at the final stop of his final campaign, just before midnight on the chilly evening before election day in Des Moines, the crowd of 20,000 strong doing call and response along with our president. “Fired up!” “Ready to go!”</p><p>This is not post-racial America, despite what some would try and have us believe. This is still racist that-nigger-messed-up-the-country America and I am crying from true joy to think that 20,000 mostly white folks are out there in Iowa — in Iowa! — for our president. For Barack Obama. For a black man. A black man! (I don’t believe that Iowans are any more likely to be racist than the rest of us, but the heartland of America is not the first place that jumps to mind when I think of racial progress.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/hillary_in_the_white_house_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove super PAC attacks Hillary Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new video from American Crossroads targets Clinton for her handling of the Benghazi attacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new video from the Karl Rove-linked super PAC American Crossroads attacks Hillary Clinton for the State Department's handling of the attacks in Benghazi, asking why Clinton "blamed protesters" and videos, instead of terrorists. "Was she part of a coverup?" the video asks.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/DqFtEtpy9G8" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Darrell Issa really wants out of Benghazi hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/darrell_issa_the_man_behind_the_benghazi_hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/darrell_issa_the_man_behind_the_benghazi_hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Fast and Furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solyndra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I worked on the GOP lawmaker's House oversight committee. He wasn't exactly known for his zest for oversight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, his hearing on Benghazi Wednesday was designed to reveal, among other potentially “explosive” points, that he has evidence of the administration’s “premeditated lying to the American people.” Issa previously said that there’s “no question” that someone from Hillary Clinton’s “circle” was involved in a “cover-up” following the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.</p><p>How seriously should Americans take Issa’s hearing and claims?</p><p>For almost four years, I worked in close proximity to him, first on the Democratic staff of the Oversight Committee (when he was ranking member) and then as legislative director for a senior member of the committee, when he was chairman. Here’s what I learned: If Darrell Issa says something – based on the record, his statements and my personal observations of him up-close – there is a strong likelihood it will be baseless and easily disproven.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/darrell_issa_the_man_behind_the_benghazi_hearings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/darrell_issa_the_man_behind_the_benghazi_hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP successfully scream &#8220;Benghazi&#8221; until people pay attention to them</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/gop_successfully_scream_benghazi_until_people_pay_attention_to_them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/gop_successfully_scream_benghazi_until_people_pay_attention_to_them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative scandal-creation apparatus still has juice, but it's not as effective as it was against Clinton]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Republicans finally got their #BENGHAZI hearing. After months of nonstop screaming, everyone finally paid attention to the conservative movement's favorite scandal since Fast and Furious. Darrell Issa's House Oversight Committee heard <em>explosive</em> testimony from three #BENGHAZI <em>whistle-blowers</em>, who blew the lid off the Obama administration's conspiracy to win reelection by allowing Americans to die in a terrorist attack and then having an administration official most Americans had never heard of pointedly not blame al-Qaida on Sunday news shows that only people in Washington care about.</p><p>Those are the accusations the #BENGHAZI coalition has been making since shortly after the attack: that the Obama administration intentionally allowed the attack on the U.S. consulate to happen, or did not do as much as it could have to stop the attack once it started, because it did not want to admit that it did not successfully destroy terrorism itself in its first term; and that after the attack, the administration intentionally and repeatedly lied about the attackers and their motivation (the "they didn't say 'terrorism'" argument), and then engaged in a Watergate-style cover-up of the fact that the attack had been terrorism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/gop_successfully_scream_benghazi_until_people_pay_attention_to_them/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/gop_successfully_scream_benghazi_until_people_pay_attention_to_them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is revolution coming to the U.S.?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They tend to come in waves, triggered by wars and anti-system protests. It can happen here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the third revolutionary wave hit the U.S. next? The revolutions in today’s world are getting ever closer to America.</p><p>Revolutions tend to occur in waves, triggered by the aftermath of wars, like the world wars, or by revolutions in leading countries, like the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848. In the last generation, there have been four regional waves of revolution. With the end of the Cold War, communist regimes were swept from power from Eastern Europe to Central Asia, surviving only in a few countries including China, North Korea and Cuba. Unable to justify themselves with the pretense of fighting communism, military dictatorships were swept away in Latin America. Then the Arab Spring triggered a wave of populist if not necessarily democratic revolutions against autocracies in North Africa and the Middle East.</p><p>Are we seeing a new wave of revolutionary politics in the heartland of the industrial West? Although governments are not being violently overthrown in Europe, political systems are being destabilized by the rise of anti-system movements opposed to the major establishment parties. In Greece, the leftist Syriza party and the far-right Golden Dawn have sapped power from the political center. The most recent Italian election was dominated by anti-system candidates, including Silvio Berlusconi and the comedian Beppe Grillo.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>