<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/hillary_rodham_clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>6 reasons Obama is losing the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The politics of hope and the politics of nope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>It’s not just the scandal fever that’s invaded Washington, where the Obama White House is dodging accusations that the IRS went after the Tea Party, or it lied in the fog of war in the aftermath of the deadly attack on the embassy in Libya, or the Justice Department went too far in spying on Associated Press to find out who was leaking details about the the CIA’s secret wars.</p><p>Obama’s popularity seems destined to slide downhill as his second term unfolds, even if polls taken just before this latest political moment show that Obama’s core supporters are still with him. Looking beyond this week’s accusatory headlines, there are a handful of single issues that will resonate among key Democratic constituencies and big-picture economic issues that seem destined to push Obama’a ratings down. He may not end his presidency in the low 20s like George W. Bush. But it’s not a stretch to say that Obama’s 51 percent approval ratings last week may be the best that he will see this term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Obama could be impeached over Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Chaffetz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Inhofe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Jason Chaffetz says impeachment is "certainly a possibility"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said that it's "certainly a possibility" that President Obama will be impeached over the attacks in Benghazi.</p><p>"It’s certainly a possibility," Chaffetz told the <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/56304185-90/obama-attack-chaffetz-impeachment.html.csp">Salt Lake Tribune</a> when asked on Monday. "That’s not the goal but given the continued lies perpetrated by this administration, I don’t know where it’s going to go. ... I’m not taking it off the table. I’m not out there touting that but I think this gets to the highest levels of our government and integrity and honesty are paramount."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Some voters outraged by Benghazi don&#8217;t know where Benghazi is</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll finds 39 percent who say Benghazi is "the biggest political scandal in American history" can't locate it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from the Democratic-learning Public Policy Polling finds that among those who describe the Benghazi controversy as "the biggest political scandal in American history," 39 percent don't actually know where Benghazi is located.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_National_51313.pdf">PPP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>One interesting thing about the voters who think Benghazi is the biggest political scandal in American history is that 39% of them don't actually know where it is. 10% think it's in Egypt, 9% in Iran, 6% in Cuba, 5% in Syria, 4% in Iraq, and 1% each in North Korea and Liberia with 4% not willing to venture a guess.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Focus on Benghazi talking points is a &#8220;sideshow&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president said the notion that there was some kind of coverup "defies logic"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama strongly condemned renewed questions about the Benghazi talking points given to Susan Rice, following <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/benghazi_emails_reveal_turf_war_over_talking_points/">reports</a> that they had been revised 12 times with input from the State Department. "The whole issue of talking points, frankly throughout this process, has been a sideshow," Obama said in a press conference on Monday. "What we have been very clear about throughout was that immediately after this event happened, we were not clear who exactly had carried it out, how it had occurred, what the motivations were.</p><p>"So the whole thing defies logic and the fact that this keeps on getting churned out, frankly has a lot to do with political motivations," he continued. "We've had folks who have challenged Hillary Clinton's integrity, Susan Rice's integrity," also noting that Republicans have used the attacks on Benghazi for fundraising.</p><p>"We dishonor them when we turn things like this into a political circus," Obama said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Kristol: Rove&#8217;s ad attacking Hillary is just &#8220;fundraising&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/bill_kristol_roves_ad_attacking_hillary_is_just_fundraising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/bill_kristol_roves_ad_attacking_hillary_is_just_fundraising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It’s ridiculous, there’s no campaign going on,” Kristol said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Kristol criticized Karl Rove and American Crossroads for an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/karl_rove_super_pac_attacks_hillary_clinton/">ad</a> attacking Hillary Clinton's handling of the attacks in Benghazi, saying that the ad "is just fundraising by American Crossroads and these other groups. It’s ridiculous! There’s no campaign going on.”</p><p>Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Kristol added that people should “pull the partisanship back. It’s a genuine outrage what happened in Benghazi, it’s a genuine outrage what the IRS did," so "I wish the Republicans would just be quiet for while — I mean, the partisan Republican groups that are fundraising off of this — would be quiet on both issues for a while, and let’s find out what really happened.”</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/12/kristol-shreds-karl-roves-super-pac-over-anti-hillary-benghazi-attack-ad/">Raw Story</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/bill_kristol_roves_ad_attacking_hillary_is_just_fundraising/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/bill_kristol_roves_ad_attacking_hillary_is_just_fundraising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter reacts to latest Benghazi twists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/twitter_reacts_to_latest_benghazi_twists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/twitter_reacts_to_latest_benghazi_twists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report that the State Department requested changes to the Benghazi talking points has reignited the controversy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though Thursday's House hearing on the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi produced no <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/no_smoking_gun_in_benghazi_hearing/">smoking gun</a>, a set of White House emails released by <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/05/exclusive-benghazi-talking-points-underwent-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-references/">ABC News</a> has stirred up the controversy once again. The emails show that the talking points given to Susan Rice were edited 12 times before she appeared on the Sunday shows, and that the State Department requested that several changes be made beforehand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/twitter_reacts_to_latest_benghazi_twists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/twitter_reacts_to_latest_benghazi_twists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul: Hillary Clinton &#8220;should never hold high office again&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul argued that "too many questions remain unanswered" about Benghazi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an op-ed for <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/10/the-moment-of-responsibility-for-hillary-clinton/?page=all#pagebreak">The Washington Times</a>, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., set the stage for a potential 2016 match-up against Hillary Clinton by attacking her handling of the Benghazi attacks, writing that "The new evidence we have today — and that continues to mount — suggests that at the very least, Mrs. Clinton should never hold high office again."</p><p>Paul referenced his contention at a Senate hearing earlier this year that he would have "relieved her of her position" if he was in office and learned that she did not read cables asking the State Department for more security at the U.S. consulate in Libya:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/rand_paul_hillary_clinton_should_never_hold_high_office_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benghazi returning as big scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/benghazi_is_about_to_become_a_real_scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/benghazi_is_about_to_become_a_real_scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP may finally get its wish with three new whistle-blowers, but has it already undermined its cred?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's been a lot of smoke in the would-be scandal over the Benghazi attacks, but no real fire yet.</p><p>But that may change when three "whistle-blowers" give what Republicans expect to be explosive testimony this week before Rep. Darrell Issa's House Oversight Committee. The controversy over the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in the Libyan city has smoldered, mainly on the right, but the testimony will likely push it back into the mainstream and could be an enormous distraction for an already injured second-term Obama.</p><p>Unlike the vast majority of the new information brought forward by the conservative media since the attack, the three whistle-blowers seem credible. One, Gregory Hicks, was the No. 2 State Department official in Libya before the attack and has decades of experience in the Foreign Service. Another, Eric Nordstrom, was the regional security officer in country for State. And the third, Mark Thompson, is the deputy coordinator for operations in the department's counterterrorism bureau and was involved in Washington's response to the Libya attacks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/benghazi_is_about_to_become_a_real_scandal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/benghazi_is_about_to_become_a_real_scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>188</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton is still the clear favorite in a potential Dem primary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll shows Clinton has a huge lead over other potential Democratic opponents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1891">Quinnipiac University</a> finds that Hillary Clinton is still the clear favorite to win in a potential 2016 Democratic primary field. If she doesn't run, Biden is the frontrunner by a significant margin.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Ms. Clinton would get 65 percent of Democratic votes compared to 13 percent for Vice President Joe Biden, 4 percent for New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and 1 percent or less for Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. If Clinton is not in the race, Biden would get 45 percent, with 15 percent for Gov. Cuomo, 6 percent for, Gov. Patrick, 3 percent O'Malley and 2 percent for Warner.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/hillary_clinton_is_still_the_clear_favorite_in_a_potential_dem_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Plouffe: I wouldn&#8217;t run Hillary&#8217;s campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/david_plouffe_i_wouldnt_run_hillarys_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/david_plouffe_i_wouldnt_run_hillarys_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david plouffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["She'd obviously be an extraordinarily strong candidate if she decided to run," Plouffe said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with Jeff Greenfield at the 92 Street Y on Sunday, President Obama's former top campaign adviser David Plouffe said that he wouldn't run Hillary Clinton's campaign if she decides to run in 2016, "because I'm done with that."</p><p>"She'd obviously be an extraordinarily strong candidate if she decided to run," he said. "We've got others obviously who will look at, it certainly if she doesn't. But it's too soon to know."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5sl9MZIq9q8?list=UU9xkc8dWgBsFfC7DOJfJLFg" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/david_plouffe_i_wouldnt_run_hillarys_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/david_plouffe_i_wouldnt_run_hillarys_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama dines with Hillary, Bill Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/obama_dines_with_hillary_bill_clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/obama_dines_with_hillary_bill_clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House says that the President recently had a private dinner with the Clintons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House says President Barack Obama held a private dinner recently with former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.</p><p>White House spokesman Josh Earnest says the trio enjoyed the conversation but isn't releasing details.</p><p>Hillary Rodham Clinton stepped down in February as Obama's chief diplomat after serving in that role throughout his first term.</p><p>On Wednesday, Obama shared another notable meal with a dozen Republican senators near the White House. He had lunch Thursday with Paul Ryan, the Republican chairman of the House Budget Committee, and Chris Van Hollen, the committee's top Democrat.</p><p>Those meals are part of a broader attempt by Obama to improve relations with congressional Republicans in hopes of jumpstarting budget talks and rallying support for other proposals.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/obama_dines_with_hillary_bill_clinton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/obama_dines_with_hillary_bill_clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Freedomworks made fake Hillary Clinton-panda sex video</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/report_freedomworks_made_fake_hillary_clinton_panda_sex_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/report_freedomworks_made_fake_hillary_clinton_panda_sex_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedomworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party group reportedly enlisted two female interns to make the video]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tea Party group Freedomworks reportedly used two female interns to make a video of a fake panda performing oral sex on a fake Hillary Clinton, initially planning to show it at a social conservative conference.</p><p>David Corn at <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/02/panda-hillary-clinton-sex-tape-freedomworks-matt-kibbe-dick-armey">Mother Jones</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>In one segment of the film, according to a former official who saw it, [Adam Brandon, executive vice president of the group] is seen waking from a nap at his desk. In what appears to be a dream or a nightmare, he wanders down a hallway and spots a giant panda on its knees with its head in the lap of a seated Hillary Clinton and apparently performing oral sex on the then-secretary of state. Two female interns at FreedomWorks were recruited to play the panda and Clinton. One intern wore a Hillary Clinton mask. The other wore a giant panda suit that FreedomWorks had used at protests to denounce progressives as panderers. (See <a href="http://www.freedomworks.org/images/panda-monium-from-freedomworks-north-carolina-4" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdYFC-mkhEk" target="_blank">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.redstate.com/tabithahale/2011/02/23/union-thuggery-descends-on-freedomworks/" target="_blank">here</a>.) Placing the panda in the video, a former FreedomWorks staffer says, was "an inside joke."</p> <p>Another FreedomWorks staffer who worked there at the time confirms that "Yes, this video was created."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/report_freedomworks_made_fake_hillary_clinton_panda_sex_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/report_freedomworks_made_fake_hillary_clinton_panda_sex_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate confirms Kerry nomination for State Department</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_confirms_kerry_nomination_for_state_dept/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_confirms_kerry_nomination_for_state_dept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kerry was overwhelmingly approved by a vote of 94-3]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has confirmed Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry as the next secretary of state.</p><p>The vote was 94-3. Once sworn-in, Kerry will replace Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is stepping down after four years.</p><p>The vote came just hours after the Foreign Relations Committee approved his nomination by voice vote. Kerry has led the committee for the past four years.</p><p>The 69-year-old Kerry is a decorated Vietnam veteran and the 2004 Democratic presidential candidate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_confirms_kerry_nomination_for_state_dept/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_confirms_kerry_nomination_for_state_dept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate panel approves Kerry nomination</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_approves_kerry_nomination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_approves_kerry_nomination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full Senate will likely vote Tuesday afternoon, and is expected to approve the nomination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday swiftly and unanimously approved President Barack Obama's choice of Sen. John Kerry to succeed Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of state.</p><p>By voice vote, the panel approved the nomination of the five-term Massachusetts Democrat, who has been a member of the committee for 28 years and led it for the past four. The full Senate likely will vote on Tuesday afternoon.</p><p>Kerry did not attend the session in the ornate diplomatic room in the Capitol. In his absence, Democrats and Republicans praised Kerry and remarked on his extensive grasp of the issues during his confirmation hearing last Thursday.</p><p>"Long-winded," joked Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a Kerry friend who had introduced the senator at that hearing.</p><p>Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., who succeeds Kerry as committee chairman, said the senator would be a "formidable secretary of state."</p><p>Obama chose Kerry, 69, the son of a diplomat, decorated Vietnam veteran and 2004 Democratic presidential candidate, to succeed Clinton, who is stepping down after four years. The senator had pined for the top diplomatic job that went to Clinton after Obama's 2008 election.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_approves_kerry_nomination/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_approves_kerry_nomination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate panel to vote on Kerry nomination Tuesday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_to_vote_on_kerry_nomination_tuesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_to_vote_on_kerry_nomination_tuesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_to_vote_on_kerry_nomination_tuesday/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is scheduled to vote on Kerry's nomination to be secretary of state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is scheduled to vote Tuesday on President Barack Obama's nomination of Sen. John Kerry to be the next secretary of state.</p><p>If approved, the nomination would move to the full Senate, which is expected to act swiftly on the choice.</p><p>Obama chose the five-term Massachusetts senator and 2004 Democratic presidential candidate to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is stepping down after four years.</p><p>Kerry has served on the Foreign Relations panel for 28 years and led the committee for the last four. He is the son of a diplomat and a decorated Vietnam veteran.</p><p>Obama is overhauling his national security team. The president has nominated Chuck Hagel for defense secretary and John Brennan to serve as CIA director.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_to_vote_on_kerry_nomination_tuesday/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/senate_panel_to_vote_on_kerry_nomination_tuesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/must_see_morning_clip_97/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/must_see_morning_clip_97/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 Minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton reflect on her work in a joint interview with "60 Minutes"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President said thank you to the outgoing Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, in a joint interview with "60 Minutes." Said Obama: "Well, the main thing is I just wanted to have a chance to publicly say thank you, because I think Hillary will go down as one of the finest secretary of states we've had. It has been a great collaboration over the last four years. I'm going to miss her. Wish she was sticking around. But she has logged in so many miles, I can't begrudge her wanting to take it easy for a little bit. But I want the country to appreciate just what an extraordinary role she's played during the course of my administration and a lot of the successes we've had internationally have been because of her hard work."</p><p><embed src="http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf" scale="noscale" salign="lt" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" background="#333333" width="425" height="279" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="si=254&&contentValue=50139839&shareUrl=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50139839n" /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/must_see_morning_clip_97/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/must_see_morning_clip_97/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerry to field questions from panel he chairs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/kerry_to_field_questions_from_panel_he_chairs_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/kerry_to_field_questions_from_panel_he_chairs_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Kerry will testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on his nomination for Secretary of State]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic Sen. John Kerry, on a smooth path to confirmation as secretary of state, is likely to face friendly questioning when he testifies before the committee that he's served on for 28 years and led for the past four.</p><p>The Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman will sit at the witness table Thursday when he appears before the panel, a month after President Barack Obama said he wanted him to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. Clinton is stepping down.</p><p>The five-term Massachusetts senator is widely expected to win overwhelming bipartisan support from his colleagues, and that notion was reinforced by the list of people who will introduce him: Clinton, Massachusetts freshman Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Republican Sen. John McCain.</p><p>McCain and Kerry are friends who have worked closely on national security issues. They're also decorated Vietnam War veterans and former presidential candidates who know the sharp sting of defeat.</p><p>At the conclusion of a Capitol Hill news conference Tuesday, McCain joked about Kerry's hearing and the tough tactics that won't be employed.</p><p>"We will look forward to interrogating him at his hearing — mercilessly," McCain said to laughter. "We will bring back, for the only time, waterboarding to get the truth."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/kerry_to_field_questions_from_panel_he_chairs_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/kerry_to_field_questions_from_panel_he_chairs_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republican grills Clinton: You let the consulate &#8220;become a death trap&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/house_republican_grills_clinton_you_let_the_consulate_become_a_death_trap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/house_republican_grills_clinton_you_let_the_consulate_become_a_death_trap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the House hearing on Benghazi, Rep. Jeff Duncan accused the Obama Administration of "gross negligence" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House Foreign Affairs Committee had its turn to grill Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over the attacks on the U. S. consulate in Benghazi, and Republicans continued to focus on the initial statements by State Department officials that attributed the attacks to protests over an anti-Muslim film. One Republican, Rep. Jeff Duncan, accused Clinton of "gross negligence" and of allowing the consulate to "become a death trap."</p><p>Duncan, R-S.C., referenced Clinton's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/hillary_clintons_benghazi_hearing_gets_heated/">testimony</a> before the Senate earlier in the day, in which she blew up at Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., for accusing the State Department of misleading the American people when it blamed the attack on the protests.</p><p>"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans,” Clinton fired back at Johnson. “Was it because of a protest, or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/house_republican_grills_clinton_you_let_the_consulate_become_a_death_trap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/house_republican_grills_clinton_you_let_the_consulate_become_a_death_trap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton blows up at Republican senator in Benghazi hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/hillary_clintons_benghazi_hearing_gets_heated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/hillary_clintons_benghazi_hearing_gets_heated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Stevens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hillary gets testy when asked why the State Department initially said the attack was the result of protests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the most explosive exchange from the Benghazi hearings, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blew up at Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., for focusing on why the State Department initially said the attack on the U.S. consulate was the result of protests. "What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to make sure that it doesn't happen again," Clinton said.</p><p>Clinton was testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the attacks on a U.S. consulate in Libya on Sept. 11, which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Johnson had wondered why there was misinformation about the attacks being the result of protests, when "a very simple call to those [Benghazi consulate] evacuees would have easily ascertained immediately that there was no protest." He then accused Clinton of making excuses for why the call was not made: "We were misled that there was supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that, and assault sprang out of that."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/hillary_clintons_benghazi_hearing_gets_heated/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/hillary_clintons_benghazi_hearing_gets_heated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton to face Congress on Libya assault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Stevens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secretary of State will answer questions about the attacks on the U.S. consulate in September]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton faces tough questions in her long-awaited congressional testimony concerning the assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.</p><p>Clinton is the sole witness Wednesday at back-to-back hearings before the Senate and House foreign policy panels on the September raid, an independent panel's review that harshly criticized the State Department and the steps the Obama administration is taking to beef up security at U.S. facilities worldwide.</p><p>Clinton had been scheduled to testify before Congress last month, but an illness, a concussion and a blood clot near her brain forced her to postpone her appearance.</p><p>Her marathon day on Capitol Hill will probably be her last in Congress before she steps down as secretary of state. President Barack Obama has nominated Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., to succeed her, and his swift Senate confirmation is widely expected. Kerry's confirmation hearing is scheduled for Thursday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
