<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Homeland Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/homeland_security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Collins: I wasn&#8217;t briefed on PRISM</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/susan_collins_i_wasnt_briefed_on_prism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/susan_collins_i_wasnt_briefed_on_prism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican from Maine was a top-ranking member of the Homeland Security Committee last session]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who was a top ranking Republican on the Homeland Security Committee last session and now sits on the Select Committee on Intelligence, says that she was never briefed on the NSA surveillance program known as PRISM.</p><p>Ryan Grim of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/susan-collins-nsa-briefings_n_3418866.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">The Huffington Post</a> reports that Collins said Senate leadership and the highest ranking intelligence committee members were informed of the program, which The Guardian and The Washington Post revealed last week. But, she said,  "The rest of us did not. At the time, I was the ranking member of the Homeland Security Committee, so I'd think that I would've had more information about that since I had, along with Joe Lieberman, a monthly threat briefing. But I did not have access to this highly compartmentalized information."</p><p>Collins added: "If they're talking about there being widespread knowledge [of PRISM in Congress], there was not."</p><p>HuffPo also reports that the Obama Administration held 22 briefings for Congress on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is the law that intelligence officials have used as authorization for the NSA's surveillance program.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/susan_collins_i_wasnt_briefed_on_prism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/susan_collins_i_wasnt_briefed_on_prism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston police commissioner: We need more cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/boston_police_commissioner_we_need_more_cameras_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/boston_police_commissioner_we_need_more_cameras_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward Davis urges lawmakers to tighten security around celebratory public events]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Boston's police commissioner told lawmakers conducting the first congressional hearing on the Marathon bombings that government should tighten security around celebratory public events and consider using more undercover officers, special police units and technology, including surveillance cameras — but only in ways that don't run afoul of civil liberties.</p><p>"I do not endorse actions that move Boston and our nation into a police state mentality, with surveillance cameras attached to every light pole in the city," Commissioner Edward Davis said in prepared remarks for the House Homeland Security Committee. "We do not and cannot live in a protective enclosure because of the actions of extremists who seek to disrupt our way of life."</p><p>Investigators used surveillance video from a restaurant near one of the explosions to help identify Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who died in a police shootout, and his younger brother, Dzhokhar, who survived, as the bombing suspects.</p><p>"Images from cameras do not lie. They do not forget," Davis said. "They can be viewed by a jury as evidence of what occurred. These efforts are not intended to chill or stifle free speech, but rather to protect the integrity and freedom of that speech and to protect the rights of victims and suspects alike."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/boston_police_commissioner_we_need_more_cameras_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/boston_police_commissioner_we_need_more_cameras_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Department of iPhone Security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claiming issues of "public safety" are involved, ICE agents help Apple bust South Florida smartphone repair shops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A South Florida TV news station <a href="http://www.local10.com/news/federal-agents-raid-smartphone-repair-shops/-/1717324/19898110/-/ldfpax/-/index.html">is reporting that over the last few months,</a> Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have been raiding local smartphone repair shops and seizing counterfeit Apple parts. As many as 25 shops have been raided and "between $250,000 and $300,000 in counterfeit Apple parts" have been confiscated. In the case of at least one of the raids, the owner of a repair shop claimed that the ICE agents were accompanied by Apple representatives.</p><blockquote><p>"It's a wide investigation that is multi-state. We are looking at whole industry spectrum of repair shops that are using substandard products," said Gerard O'Neill, Assistant Special Agent in Charge of Miami Field Office for Homeland Security.</p> <p>O'Neill says it's a public safety issue and that is how Homeland Security is involved.</p> <p>He says consumers have be hurt by overheating phones that were repaired using counterfeit parts.</p> <p>"There are trademark and licensing violations as well," he added.</p></blockquote><p>According to Abel Abella, the proprietor of one of the raided repair shops, "20 ICE agents and two people from Apple came to his store."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Rep. embraces Boston conspiracy theory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/gop_rep_embraces_boston_conspiracy_thoery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/gop_rep_embraces_boston_conspiracy_thoery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And DHS Secretary Napolitano calls the rumor \"full of misstatements and misapprehensions\" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn't take long for a lawmaker to pick up <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/the_rights_new_boston_conspiracy_theory/">the latest right-wing conspiracy theory</a> about the Boston Marathon bombings. Just hours after controversial terrorism expert Steve Emerson reported last night on Sean Hannity's show that unnamed "sources" told him the government was quietly deporting the Saudi national who was initially suspected in the bombing, South Carolina GOP Rep. Jeff Duncan grilled Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on the rumor at a <a href="http://homeland.house.gov/press-release/napolitano-testify-homeland-security-committee-fy-2014-dhs-budget-request">hearing</a> this morning.</p><p>Duncan, a member of the House Homeland Security Committee and <a href="http://homeland.house.gov/subcommittee-OME">chairman</a> of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency, harangued Napolitano for the alleged deportation, which he asserted as fact. "Now we have someone being deported for national security concerns and I'm assuming he's got some sort of link to terror or he wouldn't be being deported," Duncan said. "And yet we're going to deport him? We're going to remove him from the scene?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/gop_rep_embraces_boston_conspiracy_thoery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/gop_rep_embraces_boston_conspiracy_thoery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston explosions highlight a frightening new reality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/boston_explosions_highlight_a_frightening_new_reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/boston_explosions_highlight_a_frightening_new_reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we sort out what exactly happened in Boston, the fact that the explosions aren't surprising is itself terrifying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don’t know what the cause of the Boston Marathon explosion yet. It could be terrorism (especially with initial reports of <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/dead-explosions-boston-marathon/story?id=18960374">multiple explosive devices</a>). It could be some infrastructure-related explosion. But the fact that such a catastrophe is no longer completely <em>surprising</em> is terrifying.</p><p>I heard the news as most did - through the digital grapevine. My initial reaction was the same as that of many people with loved ones in Boston - entirely personal and worried about possible friends and family who might have been maimed or, god forbid, killed. But while I fretted and texted and called, I also realized that something had changed in me -- and in all of us -- since I fled the U.S. Capitol back on Sept. 11, 2001. What had changed was that while I was nervous, worried, disgusted and anxious -- and while I was shaking my head muttering rhetorical questions about the senselessness of the world -- I was no longer shocked.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/boston_explosions_highlight_a_frightening_new_reality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/boston_explosions_highlight_a_frightening_new_reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama is channeling Bush fever in Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/obama_is_channeling_bush_fever_in_iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/obama_is_channeling_bush_fever_in_iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war anniversary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ten years after the Iraq debacle, are we -- mind-bogglingly -- headed to war with Iran? The signals suggest yes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A gold star if you can guess who made the following four statements without clicking on the links. Hint: Two were by an aggressive, hawkish, Republican, one of which was famously said over 10 years ago. Two others are by the more erudite, constitutionally savvy, liberal, moderate, current president. You remember him: He’s the one  Hillary Clinton taunted in 2008 as not being tough enough to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yr7odFUARg" target="_blank">answer the phone</a> at 3 a.m. At this point, it’s safe to say that we no longer need to worry about that.</p><blockquote><p>1) "I have made the position of the United States of America clear: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/21/barack-obama-speech-jerusalem-text" target="_blank">Iran must not</a> get a nuclear weapon. This is not a danger that can be contained. As President, I have said to the world that all options are on the table for achieving our objectives. America will do what we must to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran."</p> <p>2) "One thing is certain. The <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on United States" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/usa" target="_blank">United States</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/08/george-bush-memoir-decision-points" target="_blank">should never allow Iran</a> to threaten the world with a nuclear bomb."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/obama_is_channeling_bush_fever_in_iran/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/obama_is_channeling_bush_fever_in_iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we less safe?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/are_we_less_safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/are_we_less_safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secrecy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama's excessive secrecy doesn't just threaten his legacy. It could harm national security]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama began his first term by pledging to bring an unprecedented level of transparency to government. Although he has done that in some areas, it has become apparent that his pledge came with an asterisk: in matters of national security policy, he has largely continued and even intensified his predecessor’s secretive practices.</p><p>But while the common justification for such conduct is the protection of Americans, there is much evidence that excessive secrecy actually harms national security.</p><p>First, it impedes information-sharing among government officials, and hampers effective coordination with our allies. It also cheapens the currency of secrecy, leading officials to exercise less care in their handling of classified information. And it results in unwise choices by executive officials who make key decisions about national security policy – for example, whether to go to war against Iraq – without the benefit of broad feedback and robust debate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/are_we_less_safe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/are_we_less_safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS releasing illegal immigrants before sequester</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/dhs_releasing_illegal_immigrants_before_sequester_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/dhs_releasing_illegal_immigrants_before_sequester_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Immigration and Customs Enforcement said it placed "several hundred" immigrants on "supervised release"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A week before mandatory budget cuts go into effect across the government, the Department of Homeland Security has started releasing illegal immigrants being held in immigration jails across the country, Immigration and Customs Enforcement said Tuesday.</p><p>Gillian Christensen, an ICE spokeswoman, said ICE has reviewed "several hundred cases" of immigrants being held in jails around the country and released them in the last week. They have been "placed on an appropriate, more cost-effective form of supervised release," she said.</p><p>Christensen said the agency's "priority for detention remains on serious criminal offenders and other individuals who pose a significant threat to public safety." She did not say how released immigrants were selected or what jails they were released from.</p><p>Tuesday's announcement of jail releases is the first tangible impact of the looming budget cuts for DHS.</p><p>The Obama administration has been issuing dire warnings about the impact of the sequestration and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano told reporters at the White House Monday that across-the-board cuts would impact the department's core operations, including border security and airport screening operations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/dhs_releasing_illegal_immigrants_before_sequester_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/dhs_releasing_illegal_immigrants_before_sequester_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At least 20 CIA prisoners still missing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/at_least_20_cia_prisoners_still_missing_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/at_least_20_cia_prisoners_still_missing_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13204956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some cases their identities are unknown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of President Barack Obama first acts in the White House, he ordered the closure of the CIA’s so-called “black-site” prisons, where terror suspects had been held and, sometimes, tortured.  The CIA says it is “<a href="http://intelligence.senate.gov/130207/prehearing.pdf">out of the detention business</a>,” as John Brennan, Obama’s pick to head the agency, recently put it.</p><p>But the CIA’s prisons left some unfinished business.  In 2009, ProPublica’s Dafna Linzer<a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/list-of-likely-cia-prisoners-who-are-still-missing-422">listed</a> more than thirty people who had been held in CIA prisons and were still missing.</p><div>Some of those prisoners have since resurfaced, but at least twenty are still unaccounted for.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/at_least_20_cia_prisoners_still_missing_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/at_least_20_cia_prisoners_still_missing_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators take up immigration in first hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/senators_take_up_immigration_in_first_hearing_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/senators_take_up_immigration_in_first_hearing_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jose Antonio Vargas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Judiciary Committee will hear testimony from Janet Napolitano, Jose Antonio Vargas and others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Senators are weighing one of President Barack Obama's second-term priorities at the first Senate hearing on a comprehensive immigration overhaul. Many stubborn fault lines are sure to emerge.</p><p>Wednesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, which comes amid a concerted focus on immigration reform from the White House to Capitol Hill, was to feature testimony from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and — in an unusual move for Congress — an illegal immigrant, Jose Antonio Vargas, a former journalist who founded the group Define American, which campaigns for immigration reform.</p><p>The former head of America Online, Steve Case, also was on the witness list, along with Chris Crane, president of the immigration and customs' workers union, which has opposed Obama's immigration policies.</p><p>The hearing comes a day after Obama, in his State of the Union address, renewed his call for sweeping immigration legislation that includes a pathway to citizenship for the nation's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of eight senators has been meeting to develop a bill by next month that accomplishes eventual citizenship for illegal immigrants while also containing enough border security and enforcement measures to gain conservative support.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/senators_take_up_immigration_in_first_hearing_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/senators_take_up_immigration_in_first_hearing_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Canadian border: A Constitution-free zone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_canadian_border_a_constitution_free_zone_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_canadian_border_a_constitution_free_zone_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drone use, surveillance and now border police all exist outside the law in the post-9/11 world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before September 11, 2001, more than half the border crossings between the United States and Canada were left unguarded at night, with only rubber cones separating the two countries. Since then, that 4,000 mile “point of pride,” as Toronto’s Globe and Mail once dubbed it, has increasingly been replaced by a U.S. homeland security lockdown, although it’s possible that, like Egyptian-American Abdallah Matthews, you haven’t noticed.</p><p>The first time he experiences this newly hardened U.S.-Canada border, it takes him by surprise. It’s a freezing late December day and Matthews, a lawyer (who asked me to change his name), is on the passenger side of a car as he and three friends cross the Blue Water Bridge from Sarnia, Ontario, to the old industrial town of Port Huron, Michigan. They are returning from the Reviving the Islamic Spirit conference in Toronto, chatting and happy to be almost home when the car pulls up to the booth, where a blue-uniformed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agent stands. The 60,000-strong CBP is the border enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security and includes both customs and U.S. Border Patrol agents. What is about to happen is the furthest thing from Matthews’s mind. He’s from Port Huron and has crossed this border “a million times before.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_canadian_border_a_constitution_free_zone_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_canadian_border_a_constitution_free_zone_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the new Peter King</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Peter King is stepping down as chair of the Homeland Security Committee -- will his replacement be any better?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for people who are uneasy with New York Republican Rep. Peter King’s leadership of the House Homeland Security Committee: He’s stepping down thanks to term limits. But there's some potential bad news: His replacement may not be a whole lot better.</p><p>Texas Republican Rep. Mike McCaul edged out Michigan Rep. Candice Miller -- who was the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84293.html">GOP’s best hope</a> of getting a female major committee head -- and Mike Rodgers in a close private <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2012/11/michael-mccaul-of-texas-tapped-to-replace-nys-peter-king-as-house-homeland-sec">vote</a> this week. King’s tenure as chairman drew controversy for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/congresss_worst_islamophobe/">series of hearings</a> he held on the radicalization of Muslims in America. Critics didn’t discount the threat of homegrown terror but said King should have expanded the hearings to include all kinds of violent radicalism, including right-wing extremism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.securefreedomradio.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/02222011_Seg3_McCaul_11min13.mp3" length="2695628" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney was for federal aid to states before he was against it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/romney_was_for_federal_aid_to_states_before_he_was_against_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/romney_was_for_federal_aid_to_states_before_he_was_against_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An little-noticed report Romney helped write called for more federal aid to local law enforcement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Mitt Romney <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/mitt_flips_on_fema_now_would_keep_it/singleton/">doesn’t want to eliminate FEMA</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/mitts_disastrous_emergency_management_plan/">anymore</a>, but he definitely still wants to give the states more responsibility for their own security. “States should be in charge of emergency management in responding to storms and other natural disasters in their jurisdictions,” is his current position, according to a spokesperson. As we’ve <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/29/mitts_disastrous_emergency_management_plan/">noted</a>, states already play the primary role in responding to natural disasters and adding to their responsibilities would prove difficult, since budget-strapped states simply don’t have the resources needed to respond to major disasters.</p><p>Romney himself understood this very problem when he chaired a little-noticed advisory council on homeland security in 2004.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/romney_was_for_federal_aid_to_states_before_he_was_against_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/romney_was_for_federal_aid_to_states_before_he_was_against_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What won&#8217;t be discussed during tonight&#8217;s debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/what_wont_be_discussed_during_tonights_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/what_wont_be_discussed_during_tonights_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expect both candidates to pose and posture -- and ignore pressing issues like our mission in the Middle East]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a debate club back in high school. Two teams would meet in the auditorium, and Mr. Garrity would tell us the topic, something 1970s-ish like “Resolved: Women Should Get Equal Pay for Equal Work” or “World Communism Will Be Defeated in Vietnam.” Each side would then try, through persuasion and the marshalling of facts, to clinch the argument. There’d be judges and a winner.</p><p>Today’s presidential debates are a long way from Mr. Garrity’s club. It seems that the first rule of the debate club now is: no disagreeing on what matters most. In fact, the two candidates rarely interact with each other at all, typically ditching whatever the question might be for some rehashed set of campaign talking points, all with the complicity of the celebrity media moderators preening about democracy in action. Waiting for another quip about Big Bird is about all the content we can expect.<br /> <a name="more"></a><br /> But the joke is on us. Sadly, the two candidates are stand-ins for Washington in general, a “war” capital whose denizens work and argue, sometimes fiercely, from within a remarkably limited range of options.  It was D.C. on autopilot last week for domestic issues; the next two presidential debates are to be in part or fully on foreign policy challenges (of which there are so many). When it comes to foreign -- that is, military -- policy, the gap between Barack and Mitt is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/us/politics/obama-and-romney-strain-to-assert-foreign-policy-differences.html" target="_blank">slim</a> to the point of nonexistent on many issues, however much they may badger each other on the subject.  That old saw about those who fail to understand history repeating its mistakes applies a little too easily here: the last 11 years have added up to one disaster after another abroad, and without a smidgen of new thinking (guaranteed not to put in an appearance at any of the debates to come), we doom ourselves to more of the same.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/what_wont_be_discussed_during_tonights_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/what_wont_be_discussed_during_tonights_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine terrifying facts about America&#8217;s biggest police force</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYPD has expanded into a massive global anti-terror operation with military capabilities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The NYPD is the biggest police force in the country, with over <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/faq/faq_police.shtml">34,000 uniformed officers</a> patrolling New York's streets, and 51,000 employees overall -- more than the FBI. It has a proposed budget of $4.6 billion for 2013, a figure that represents almost 15 percent of the <a href="http://www.council.nyc.gov/html/budget/PDFs/2013/056%20Police%20Department.pdf">entire city’s budget.</a></p><p>NYC's population is a little over 8 million. That means that there are 4.18 police officers per 1,000 people. By comparison, Los Angeles, the second largest city in the U.S. with 3.8 million people, has only 9,895 officers--a ratio of 2.6 police <a href="http://www.lapdonline.org/march_2009/news_view/41030">per 1,000 people.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS&#8217;s right-wing terror blind spot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/15/dhss_right_wing_terror_blind_spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/15/dhss_right_wing_terror_blind_spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryl Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oak creek shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12982206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Oak Creek, two former DHS analysts tell Salon how their ex-employer gutted the right-wing terrorism unit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daryl Johnson, architect of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/14/homeland-security-report_n_186834.html" target="_blank">the infamous 2009 Department of Homeland Security report on right-wing extremism</a>, made headlines last year, when he accused Homeland Security of ignoring the growing threat of right-wing violence due to political pressure. Johnson said DHS employed just one analyst to monitor all non-Islamic extremism, down from eight prior to the report’s release. In stark contrast, the department has at least two dozen personnel assigned to analyzing the threat of homegrown Islamic extremism.</p><p>Fast-forward to 2012, and the danger posed by right-wing extremists still exists, as demonstrated by the recent Sikh Temple massacre, in Wisconsin. Yet DHS continues to turn a blind eye, says Johnson.</p><p>“Right around the time I went public last year, they hired a brand-new person with no experience and no law enforcement connections,” Johnson told Salon. But shortly thereafter the new hire was transferred to a different unit, again leaving just one analyst on the beat. A year later, Johnson says, “absolutely nothing has changed.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/15/dhss_right_wing_terror_blind_spot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/15/dhss_right_wing_terror_blind_spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Democrats heroically fund TSA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12925982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats score the dumbest political victory of 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, a <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/228835-senate-moves-forward-with-increased-airline-passenger-fees#.T7vGjswN384.twitter">Senate Appropriations Committee vote</a> effectively highlighted everything that is stupid about politics.</p><p>The Transportation Security Administration, a universally loathed government agency, is facing a shortfall, despite its more than $8 billion budget. Instead of having a debate over what effective airport security might actually look like and how much should reasonably be spent on the honestly rare threat of commercial-air-travel-based terrorism, there was a debate over how best to come up with the money needed for all the radioactive naked picture machines and bomb-sniffing dogs. The Democrats suggested passing on the cost of ineffective, cumbersome and intrusive security theater to citizens, via higher fees on airfares. The Republicans, even more predictably, suggested cutting spending that directly helps poor people to ensure there is enough to spend on stopping imaginary future 9/11s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doubling down on 9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12697651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A decade after the attacks, our national security regime continues to grow ever more punitive and secretive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, you’d think we’d be entering the end of the 9/11 era. One war over in the Greater Middle East, another hurtling disastrously to its end, and the threat of al-Qaida so diminished that it should hardly move the needle on the national worry meter. You might think, in fact, that the moment had arrived to turn the American gaze back to first principles: the Constitution and its protections of rights and liberties.</p><p>Yet warning signs abound that 2012 will be another year in which, in the name of national security, those rights and liberties are only further Guantanamo-ized and abridged. Most notably, for example, despite the fact that genuinely dangerous enemies continue to exist abroad, there is now a new enemy in our sights: namely, American oppositional types and whistleblowers who are <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175500/peter_van_buren_silent_state">charged</a> as little short of traitors for revealing the workings of our government to journalists and others.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence agencies step up the Twitter and Facebook trawling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security works to catch up with the CIA in the social media monitoring department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of days ago, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">the Associated Press reported</a> that the Department of Homeland Security claims not to be "actively monitoring" social media networks like Facebook and Twitter. Lest you worry that status updates that present a threat to national security are going unread, the <a href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111104/ap_on_go_ot/us_cia_social_media">AP today reports</a> that the Central Intelligence Agency <em>is</em> actively monitoring social media networks.</p><p>The story in the earlier article was that our sprawling intelligence and national security apparatus was caught off-guard by social media-fueled uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, and that they were going to take steps to be better prepared in the future.</p><p>DHS Undersecretary Caryn Wagner said the department was still trying to figure out how to use Twitter and Facebook information for law enforcement purposes. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">And they seem to be starting completely from scratch:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The shadow of suspicion falls in the Mall of America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2011/09/07/mallofamerica</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visitors who have done nothing wrong are winding up identified in counterterrorism reports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     On May 1, 2008, at 4:59 p.m., Brad Kleinerman entered the spooky world of homeland security. </p><p>     As he shopped for a children's watch inside the sprawling Mall of America, two security guards approached and began questioning him. Although he was not accused of wrongdoing, the guards filed a confidential report about Kleinerman that was forwarded to local police. </p><p>     The reason: Guards thought he might pose a threat because he had been looking at them in a suspicious way. </p><p>     Najam Qureshi, owner of a kiosk that sold items from his native Pakistan, also had his own experience with authorities after his father left a cellphone on a table in the food court. </p><p>     The consequence: An FBI agent showed up at the family's home, asking if they knew anyone who might want to hurt the United States. </p><p>     Mall of America officials say their security unit stops and questions on average up to 1,200 people each year. With 4.2 million square feet under one roof, the two-decade-old mall is a monument to suburban shopping and entertainment. Nearly 100,000 people from around the world pass through on a given day. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
