<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Homeland Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/homeland_security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Democrats heroically fund TSA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12925982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats score the dumbest political victory of 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, a <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/228835-senate-moves-forward-with-increased-airline-passenger-fees#.T7vGjswN384.twitter">Senate Appropriations Committee vote</a> effectively highlighted everything that is stupid about politics.</p><p>The Transportation Security Administration, a universally loathed government agency, is facing a shortfall, despite its more than $8 billion budget. Instead of having a debate over what effective airport security might actually look like and how much should reasonably be spent on the honestly rare threat of commercial-air-travel-based terrorism, there was a debate over how best to come up with the money needed for all the radioactive naked picture machines and bomb-sniffing dogs. The Democrats suggested passing on the cost of ineffective, cumbersome and intrusive security theater to citizens, via higher fees on airfares. The Republicans, even more predictably, suggested cutting spending that directly helps poor people to ensure there is enough to spend on stopping imaginary future 9/11s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/23/senate_democrats_heroically_fund_tsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doubling down on 9/11</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12697651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A decade after the attacks, our national security regime continues to grow ever more punitive and secretive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, you’d think we’d be entering the end of the 9/11 era. One war over in the Greater Middle East, another hurtling disastrously to its end, and the threat of al-Qaida so diminished that it should hardly move the needle on the national worry meter. You might think, in fact, that the moment had arrived to turn the American gaze back to first principles: the Constitution and its protections of rights and liberties.</p><p>Yet warning signs abound that 2012 will be another year in which, in the name of national security, those rights and liberties are only further Guantanamo-ized and abridged. Most notably, for example, despite the fact that genuinely dangerous enemies continue to exist abroad, there is now a new enemy in our sights: namely, American oppositional types and whistleblowers who are <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175500/peter_van_buren_silent_state">charged</a> as little short of traitors for revealing the workings of our government to journalists and others.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/doubling_down_on_911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence agencies step up the Twitter and Facebook trawling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security works to catch up with the CIA in the social media monitoring department]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of days ago, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">the Associated Press reported</a> that the Department of Homeland Security claims not to be "actively monitoring" social media networks like Facebook and Twitter. Lest you worry that status updates that present a threat to national security are going unread, the <a href="http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111104/ap_on_go_ot/us_cia_social_media">AP today reports</a> that the Central Intelligence Agency <em>is</em> actively monitoring social media networks.</p><p>The story in the earlier article was that our sprawling intelligence and national security apparatus was caught off-guard by social media-fueled uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, and that they were going to take steps to be better prepared in the future.</p><p>DHS Undersecretary Caryn Wagner said the department was still trying to figure out how to use Twitter and Facebook information for law enforcement purposes. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j2QncVujJYeKvVMAwzSqq5eSaSLA?docId=d607e3efe1324adeb54d3fd505e1feb1">And they seem to be starting completely from scratch:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/intelligence_agencies_step_up_the_twitter_and_facebook_trawling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The shadow of suspicion falls in the Mall of America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2011/09/07/mallofamerica</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visitors who have done nothing wrong are winding up identified in counterterrorism reports]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    On May 1, 2008, at 4:59 p.m., Brad Kleinerman entered the spooky world of homeland security.
</p><p>
    As he shopped for a children's watch inside the sprawling Mall of America, two security guards approached and began questioning him. Although he was not accused of wrongdoing, the guards filed a confidential report about Kleinerman that was forwarded to local police.
</p><p>
    The reason: Guards thought he might pose a threat because he had been looking at them in a suspicious way.
</p><p>
    Najam Qureshi, owner of a kiosk that sold items from his native Pakistan, also had his own experience with authorities after his father left a cellphone on a table in the food court.
</p><p>
    The consequence: An FBI agent showed up at the family's home, asking if they knew anyone who might want to hurt the United States.
</p><p>
    Mall of America officials say their security unit stops and questions on average up to 1,200 people each year. With 4.2 million square feet under one roof, the two-decade-old mall is a monument to suburban shopping and entertainment. Nearly 100,000 people from around the world pass through on a given day.
</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/mallofamerica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dubious Muslim-bashing &#8220;expert&#8221; hired to train cops</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/dhs_pays_walid_shoebat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/dhs_pays_walid_shoebat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/24/dhs_pays_walid_shoebat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[South Dakota's Office of Homeland Security pays federal grant money to purported "ex-terrorist"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Homeland Security this month paid $5,000 to anti-Muslim terrorism "expert" Walid Shoebat to speak at a conference for South Dakota law enforcement, despite Shoebat's history of dubious claims about the threat of Islam as well as his own background.</p><p>That $5,000 figure was unearthed by a public records <a href="http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/042f2a16-8368-11e0-b921-001cc4c03286.html">request filed by</a> Rapid City Journal reporter David Montgomery. Shoebat is an evangelical Christian whose <a href="http://www.shoebat.com/">website</a> describes him as a "former PLO terrorist [who] now speaks out for USA and Israel."</p><p>However, as <a href="http://www.ibishblog.com/blog/hibish/2011/05/22/how_could_dhs_pay_fraud_con_man_fanatic_%E2%80%9Cwalid_shoebat%E2%80%9D_5k_spread_hate">Hussein Ibish</a> and <a href="http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=96502">others</a> have documented, Shoebat's claims about his past are largely unsubstantiated, down to whether his real name is really Walid Shoebat. He, for example, claims that, in his Islamic extremist days in the 1970s, he threw at a bomb at a Bethlehem bank. But the bank <a href="http://www.jpost.com/LandedPages/PrintArticle.aspx?id=96502">says</a> it never happened, and there are no news reports of any such terrorist attack. Surveying Shoebat's history of questionable claims, Ibish <a href="http://www.ibishblog.com/blog/hibish/2011/05/23/more_%E2%80%9Cwalid_shoebat%E2%80%9D_and_his_allies_and_competitors_%E2%80%9Creformed_terrorists%E2%80%9D_sca">concludes</a> that he is a "shameless fraud."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/dhs_pays_walid_shoebat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/dhs_pays_walid_shoebat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Peter King rationalized terrorism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/peter_king_ira/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/peter_king_ira/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King, R-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/10/peter_king_ira</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The IRA's violence is only a reaction to violence started by the British government"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King, the Homeland Security committee chairman who will convene hearings Thursday on the threat of domestic terrorism and "radicalization" among American Muslims, is finding it difficult to shake his past. As is now well known thanks to a spurt of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/us/politics/09king.html?_r=1&amp;hp">recent</a> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/04/AR2011030406635.html">press</a>, King was, as a Long Island politician on the make, an active supporter of the Irish Republican Army for many years.</p><p>To this day, even while he's taking a hard line against Muslim terrorism, King still describes the IRA as a "legitimate force." (At the same time, King wants to brand WikiLeaks' Julian Assange a terrorist.)</p><p>At least one victim of an IRA attack has <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/01/07/peter_king_ira_bombing_survivor">called out</a> King for his "hypocrisy." So, for the sake of the record, we thought it would be worth collecting a few of King's more striking quotes about the IRA when its campaign of terrorism was in <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/03/09/peter_king_ira_american_bomb/">full force</a>. None of this is to say that terrorism is not a complex issue that deserves to be considered in a nuanced way. But now that King is chairman of the Homeland Security committee and taking the lead looking at terrorism, it's worth knowing his history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/peter_king_ira/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/peter_king_ira/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police intercept Detroit mosque bomb plot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/31/us_mosque_terrorist_threat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/31/us_mosque_terrorist_threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/31/us_mosque_terrorist_threat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California man is accused with planning to detonate a vehicle full of explosives outside of a packed mosque]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Southern California man caught with explosives in his vehicle outside a large suburban Detroit mosque where mourners had gathered for a funeral was planning to try to blow it up, authorities say.</p><p>Dearborn police Chief Ronald Haddad said Sunday that authorities believe Roger Stockham was acting alone in the plot against one of the nation's largest mosques but still take him "very seriously." He was arraigned Wednesday on one count of making a false report or threat of terrorism and one count of possessing explosives with an unlawful intent.</p><p>Stockham had a large but undisclosed quantity of class-C fireworks including M-80s, which are outlawed in Michigan, Haddad said.</p><p>"I was comfortable with the fact that we had taken him off the street -- he isn't going anywhere," Haddad said. "I think the society he wanted to impact is safe."</p><p>Haddad said Stockham was arrested the evening of Jan. 24 in the parking lot of Islamic Center of America, while a large group was gathered inside. He said police received a 911 call from a resident.</p><p>He said Stockham has "a long history of anti-government activities," though he declined to elaborate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/31/us_mosque_terrorist_threat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/31/us_mosque_terrorist_threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Radicalization&#8221; hearings lose anti-jihadist support</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/peter_king_anti_jihadists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/peter_king_anti_jihadists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King, R-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/26/peter_king_anti_jihadists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How professional anti-Muslim activists became disillusioned with their biggest ally in Congress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King (R-NY) is scheduled to hold hearings on "radicalization" of American Muslims next month, and he has already taken heat from Muslim <a href="http://minnesotaindependent.com/75533/ellison-confronts-king-on-planned-muslim-investigations">leaders</a> and others who are aghast at, for example, King's <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2011/01/25/king-radical-mosques/">suggestion</a> that "80 percent" of mosques are controlled by radicals.</p><p>But King is now facing criticism from an unlikely source: the self-described "anti-jihadist" writers who make their living by crusading against Islam and would be expected to be King's biggest supporters. As blogger Pamela Geller (of "ground zero mosque" <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/08/16/ground_zero_mosque_origins">fame</a>)&#160;wrote in the American Thinker <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/king_abdicates.html">last week:</a>&#160;</p><blockquote>
<p>Methinks Representative King is a wee bit in over his head. I am filled with dread and sorrow at another lost opportunity. Doesn't King know he is going to be smeared and defamed for these hearings no matter what? So why not achieve something? Why not have the courage of your convictions?</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/peter_king_anti_jihadists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/26/peter_king_anti_jihadists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kinder Surprise chocolates and other surprising border-patrol contraband</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/francis_lam/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a woman faced fines for a kid's chocolate, we asked a customs officer: What else can get you in trouble?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the stop-looking-at-my-privates noise being made at airports these days, it's easy to overlook the real victims of Homeland Security crackdowns: the children. Specifically, the children who are expecting their toy-filled Kinder Surprise chocolate eggs.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2011/01/10/man-kinder-surprise-border.html">CBC recently reported the tragic story</a>: A Canadian woman, by the near-symmetrical name of Lind Bird, was driving across the U.S. border when she was stopped for a random search, which randomly turned up the most randomly illegal contraband of all time -- a chocolate egg-toy that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has determined is a clear and present danger out to choke American children. The border patrol officer threatened a $300 fine, Ms. Bird politely gave up the Kinder Surprise, and, after an extended hassle including signing off on a <em>seven-page</em> letter authorizing U.S. authorities to destroy (read: snack on) the confiscated goods, she tried to pick up the pieces and get on with her life, scarred by a government that has that kind of time and money to throw around, but not enough resources for universal healthcare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/14/kinder_surprise_contraband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desert manhunt underway after border agent killing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/us_border_agent_killed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/us_border_agent_killed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/16/us_border_agent_killed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal officers, Arizona law enforcement team up to try to find sole remaining suspect in Tuesday's fatal shooting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teams of border officers are combing a section of the Arizona desert about 10 miles north of Mexico in search of the lone outstanding suspect in the fatal shooting of a Border Patrol agent.</p><p>They're on horseback and all-terrain vehicles searching rugged, hard-to-reach spots in a mountainous area just north of Nogales in southeastern Arizona. They're also in patrol cars searching the perimeter.</p><p>Santa Cruz County Sheriff Tony Estrada, whose deputies are helping in the search, says they'll keep at it until the suspect is caught or they're sure he's gone for good.</p><p>Brian A. Terry was waiting with three other agents in a remote area north of Nogales late Tuesday when the gunbattle erupted and he was killed. Four suspects are in custody.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>TUCSON, Ariz. (AP) -- A shootout between border patrol agents and bandits near Arizona's troubled boundary with Mexico has left one American agent dead and a suspect wounded, a union leader says.</p><p>The clash Tuesday night came after agents spotted suspected bandits known for targeting illegal immigrants along a violent smuggling corridor in the Arizona desert, National Border Patrol Council President T.J. Bonner said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/us_border_agent_killed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/us_border_agent_killed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. issues new security rules for air cargo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/us_mail_bombs_us_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/us_mail_bombs_us_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/08/us_mail_bombs_us_security</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of last month's thwarted terror plot, American authorities have banned all cargo from Yemen and Somalia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says new security rules are in place banning all cargo from Yemen and Somalia and prohibiting the transport of printer toner and ink cartridges weighing more than one pound on passenger flights.</p><p>The new rules come after counterterrorism officials thwarted a terror plot last month that shipped bombs hidden inside printers in packages bound on aircraft from Yemen to the U.S.</p><p>Immediately after officials learned of the plot, the U.S. ordered a temporary ban on all cargo from Yemen. Monday's announcement extends that ban to Somalia, where intelligence officials believe terrorists are actively plotting attacks against the U.S.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/us_mail_bombs_us_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/08/us_mail_bombs_us_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British Airways chairman pans U.S. security rules</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/eu_britain_flight_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/eu_britain_flight_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/27/eu_britain_flight_security</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Martin Broughton says authorities should not "kowtow" to every U.S. demand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States is making excessive demands for airline passenger screening, including measures it doesn't require on U.S. domestic flights, the chairman of British Airways says.</p><p>Martin Broughton complained specifically about separate checks of laptop computers and forcing people to take off their shoes for checking, saying that such measures are "completely redundant," the Financial Times reported Wednesday.</p><p>Broughton aired his complaint Tuesday at the annual conference of the U.K. Airport Operators Association. British Airways said the report was accurate, but it does not have a text of the chairman's remarks.</p><p>"America does not do internally a lot of the things they demand that we do," Broughton was quoted as saying.</p><p>"We shouldn't stand for that. We should say, 'We'll only do things which we consider to be essential and that you Americans also consider essential.'"</p><p>Broughton added that British authorities should not "kowtow to the Americans every time they wanted something done."</p><p>"We all know there's quite a number of elements in the security program which are completely redundant and they should be sort out," he was quoted as saying.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/eu_britain_flight_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/27/eu_britain_flight_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Mr. President: Please abuse your powers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/obama_abuse_civil_liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/obama_abuse_civil_liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/dan_gillmor/2010/06/22/obama_abuse_civil_liberties</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, it takes abuses before we wake up to dangers of untrammeled executive authority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano <a href="http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/speeches/sp_1277158211019.shtm">declared the need</a> for "legal tools to do things like monitor the recruitment of terrorists via the Internet." She wasn't specific about what she meant by that, but her remarks were widely understood, no doubt correctly, as a harbinger of yet another Obama administration encroachment on American civil liberties. (The most surprising part of Napolitano's pitch, in fact, was the word "legal" -- after all, the administration hasn't bothered with such niceties in any number of other situations, as Salon colleague Glenn Greenwald has <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/05/13/citizens">repeatedly pointed out</a>.)</p><p>Yesterday, the Supreme Court <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/us/politics/22scotus.html?hp=&amp;pagewanted=print">upheld a law</a> that can put you in jail for the "crime" of advocating lawful, nonviolent activity, if the government decides that your advocacy is somehow helping a group the government declares is engaging in terrorism. Authoritarian right wingers reading this may be pleased to hear that <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2010/6/22/headlines/supreme_court_upholds_material_support_law">Jimmy Carter could be a criminal</a> under this ruling. They should also be thrilled to know that the Obama administration fought hard for this ruling, and that Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, as solicitor general, argued for this gross encroachment on free speech and the First Amendment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/obama_abuse_civil_liberties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/22/obama_abuse_civil_liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck stops making sense</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/beck_brunn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/beck_brunn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/06/11/beck_brunn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beck: It's not the right wing's fault that crazy lefties are killing people to protest Obama's policies. Say what?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d get exhausted, being Glenn Beck. The only time the talking head ever gets a break from blaming the left for fostering totalitarianism and encouraging political violence is when he pauses to remember that we shouldn&#8217;t try to score cheap political points from such tragedies.</p><p>On his show <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQnfJeUzzKk&amp;feature=player_embedded">Wednesday</a>, Beck tried to puzzle out the political meaning of the attack on the U.S. Holocaust Museum. Alleged shooter James Von Brunn, Beck said, is &#8220;a lone gunman nutjob.&#8221; Fair enough. &#8220;You're going to see a lot of nutjobs coming out of the woodwork now.&#8221; Uh-oh. Scarier still, <em>all of our enemies may be working together</em>. &#8220;They'd like to destroy us and they will work with anyone,&#8221; Beck says ominously.</p><p>You see, crazed militants, whether Islamists or white supremacists like Von Brunn, are responding to increasing &#8220;pressure.&#8221; Beck doesn&#8217;t excuse political violence, but he does see a cause. Several, actually. &#8220;It's the economy, it is political correctness, it's corruption in Washington, it's the militant Islam. It's all of these things.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/beck_brunn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/11/beck_brunn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radio host Savage sues DHS over rightwing extremism report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/dhs_report_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/dhs_report_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/17/dhs_report</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right's still angry over a Homeland Security analysis that warned the political and economic climate might help potentially violent groups with recruiting. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives' furor over a <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/04/14/dhs_report/index.html">recent Department of Homeland Security report</a> warning law enforcement that the political and economic situation might help potentially violent rightwing extremist groups recruit new members shows no signs of abating. In the latest move against DHS, radio host Michael Savage joined with a conservative Christian legal group, the Thomas More Law Center, to file suit against DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and Attorney General Eric Holder.</p><p>To be clear, the report isn't really what the right believes it is. To begin with, the idea for it didn't come from the Obama administration -- it was <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017768.php">prepared</a> by an office still headed by a man appointed to his post by former President Bush. And it doesn't demonize mainstream conservatives, or veterans, in the way that some pundits on the right say it does, though it is true that some of the language used could have been much more precise. In the case of veterans, the analysis simply points out, "Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&amp;A is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent capabilities."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/dhs_report_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/17/dhs_report_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS report warns of rightwing extremism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/dhs_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/dhs_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/14/dhs_report</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homeland Security is concerned that today's political and economic climate is similar to the one that inspired Timothy McVeigh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a report produced earlier this month, but just leaked, the Department of Homeland Security warns that the political and economic climate today is similar to the one that fueled the militia movement -- and, eventually, the Oklahoma City bombing -- during the 1990s.</p><p>The intelligence assessment, which is being provided to federal, state and local law enforcement, notes that DHS "has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence." But it does say there may be a new wave of recruitment into extremist groups, as "the economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/dhs_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/dhs_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former high-ranking Bush officials enjoy war profits</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/spies_for_hire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/spies_for_hire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/excerpt/2008/05/29/spies_for_hire</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now working inside America's "shadow" spy industry, George Tenet, Richard Armitage, Cofer Black and others are cashing in big on Iraq and the war on terror.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Richard L. Armitage, who served from 2001 to 2005 as Deputy Secretary of State, was a rarity in the Bush administration: an official who delighted in talking to the press. Reporters loved him for his withering criticism of the neoconservative zealots around President George W. Bush and in part because he fed them tidbits about the White House they could obtain nowhere else. His accidental disclosure to conservative columnist Robert Novak that Valerie Plame, the wife of Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson, was working undercover for the Central Intelligence Agency remains one of the most notorious leaks of the Bush era. </p><p> But perhaps because of his cozy ties to the Washington press corps and the media's obsession with Plamegate, very little has been written about Armitage's extensive business dealings. In fact, Armitage is one of the most successful capitalists in Washington. He has successfully parlayed his experience in covert operations and secret diplomacy into a thriving career as a consultant and adviser to some of the biggest players in America's Intelligence Industrial Complex -- corporations that are working at the heart of U.S. national security and profiting handsomely from it. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/spies_for_hire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/29/spies_for_hire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FEMA covered up cancer risks to Katrina victims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/29/fema_coverup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/29/fema_coverup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/01/29/fema_coverup</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documents obtained by Salon reveal FEMA officials ignored scientific advice about toxins in thousands of emergency trailers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last summer, the Federal Emergency Management Agency was publicly shamed when lawmakers revealed the agency, to avoid lawsuits, put off testing trailers used to house <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/hurricane_katrina/>Hurricane Katrina</a> victims for formaldehyde, a toxic chemical. Now, documents obtained by Salon show that FEMA also pressured scientists to water down a report on the health risks of formaldehyde. FEMA officials instructed the scientists to omit any references to cancer or other long-term health risks from exposure to formaldehyde in FEMA trailers. </p><p>In a scathing letter sent today to Dr. Howard Frumkin, chief of the National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Reps. Brad Miller, chairman of the House Science and Technology Committee's Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, and Nick Lampson, chairman of the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, wrote, "you appear to have been complicit in giving FEMA precisely what they wanted ... However what FEMA wanted and what you approved giving them was not the whole truth regarding formaldehyde. It was not based on 'best science,' nor did it provide 'trusted health information' to the Katrina survivors." FEMA and ATSDR officials are expected to testify Tuesday before the House Committee on <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/homeland_security/">Homeland Security</a>, which is also investigating the matter. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/01/29/fema_coverup/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/01/29/fema_coverup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of the inner circle? Hardly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/johnson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/johnson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/08/27/johnson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN says the president is likely to pick Chertoff to replace Gonzales, then a Bush loyalist to replace Chertoff.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the resignation of Alberto Gonzales, there will be lots of talk about the disbanding of the president's inner circle. Gonzales? Gone. Karl Rove? Gone. Harriet Miers? Gone. Dan Bartlett, Scott McClellan, Andy Card, Donald Rumsfeld? All gone. </p><p>Well, not all. </p><p>CNN is reporting that Bush will likely nominate Michael Chertoff to replace Alberto Gonzales as attorney general and Clay Johnson III to replace Chertoff as the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. </p><p>Who's Clay Johnson III? As <a href= "http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/27/clay-johnson-dhs/">Think Progress</a> reports, Johnson is a prep club pal of the president's who served as his chief of staff back in Texas. As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/washington/21loyalists.html?ei=5088&en=b11ded99092c9318&ex=1329714000&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=all">New York Times</a> reported earlier this year, Johnson is so devoted to the president that he keeps a George W. Bush doll on his desk. </p><p>Johnson, who say he finds it "incredible" that people could think Bush has lied about anything, is currently the deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget. His homeland security experience? As far as we can tell, he has exactly none. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/johnson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/27/johnson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No wonder they called him Turd Blossom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/15/rove_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/15/rove_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/garrison_keillor//2007/08/15/rove</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl Rove could put fecal matter on his lapel and call it a boutonniere.  Goodbye and good riddance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What truly cheers me up through these dog days of summer is the thought that two old friends of mine are up north on a canoe trip in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area and that I am not there with them. I am here, reading the paper, and if I wanted to go to a movie, I could go, and if I wished to use a flush toilet, I could do that, too. But for the grace of God, I could be sitting on the ground, filthy, embittered, a homeless person, eating freeze-dried food and listening to the Master Woodsman tell you what a great experience you're having and meanwhile the woods are not lovely, just dark and deep, and a cloud of mosquitoes has come out to avenge the white man's colonizing of North America. I have been on canoe trips, I know what goes on. </p><p>Every canoe trip has a self-appointed Master Woodsman. In civilian life he may be a mild-mannered clerk in a cubicle, but out on the trail he is transformed into the song leader, pathfinder, the great helmsman, the tier of correct knots, and the authority on bears. He shows you how to do everything except the things you really need to do, such as 1) move your bowels in some dignified manner and 2) get out of here and find a hotel. Your body aches from sleeping on the ground, your bowels have turned to stone, and you are thinking about "Lord of the Flies" and what it says about the fragility of civilization, but he is relentlessly upbeat. And then it dawns on you: Your suffering is what turns him on. The man is a sadist. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/08/15/rove_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/08/15/rove_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

