<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Hormones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/hormones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oxytocin: Cupid&#8217;s arrow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/oxytocin_cupids_arrow_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/oxytocin_cupids_arrow_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxytocin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hormones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hormone increases our empathy and capacity to communicate, both keys to sustaining a long-term relationship]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=rss"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> If cupid had studied neuroscience, he’d know to aim his arrows at the brain rather than the heart. Recent research suggests that for love to last, it’s best he dip those arrows in oxytocin. Although scientists have long known that this hormone is essential for monogamous rodents to stay true to their mates, and that it makes humans more trusting toward one another, they are now finding that it is also crucial to how we form and maintain romantic relationships.</p><p>A handful of new studies show that oxytocin makes us more sympathetic, supportive and open with our feelings—all necessary for couples to celebrate not just one Valentine’s Day, but many. These findings have led some researchers to investigate whether oxytocin can be used in couple therapy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/oxytocin_cupids_arrow_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/oxytocin_cupids_arrow_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN removes story about women&#8217;s hormones affecting voting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/cnn_removes_story_about_womens_hormones_affecting_voting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/cnn_removes_story_about_womens_hormones_affecting_voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hormones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article based on unpublished research was swiftly decried and mocked online]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following widespread <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/cnn_wonders_do_hormones_drive_womens_votes/">ridicule</a>, CNN has removed a story published online Wednesday about whether hormones could influence female voting choices.</p><p>The piece by Elizabeth Landau looked at unpublished research that suggested female voting behavior was affected by whether a woman was ovulating on Election Day, or as our own Jillian Rayfield <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/cnn_wonders_do_hormones_drive_womens_votes/"> put it</a> Wednesday, whether "their lady parts might be doing the voting for them." As <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/192847/cnn-removes-story-about-how-hormones-affect-womens-voting/">Poynter noted Thursday</a>, CNN has taken down the post and put up a notice stating that "after further review it was determined that some elements of the story did not meet the editorial standards of CNN."</p><p>Poynter notes that CNN has not elaborated on which precise elements in Landau's post fell short of its standards.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/cnn_removes_story_about_womens_hormones_affecting_voting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/cnn_removes_story_about_womens_hormones_affecting_voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
