<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Housing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/housing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The recession was her fault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet Wall Street's scapegoat, the one person to get jail time for the most massive mortgage fraud in history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You remember Lynndie England. She was the Army Reserve soldier photographed at the Abu Ghraib prison giving the thumbs-up sign in front of a set of naked detainees. A lower-level reservist, she was among the few at Abu Ghraib who actually served prison time.</p><p>No officers who authorized and directed the torture and detainee abuse, either in that prison, at Guantanamo Bay or anywhere around the world, ever faced trial. But Lynndie England became a symbol for the sorry state of the rule of law in America, where a few small “bad apples” get held to account, and the higher-ups who devised and directed the criminal activity get off scot-free.</p><p>There’s a Lynndie England for the financial crisis, too.</p><p>Meet Lorraine O. Brown, an individual singled out for actual jail time for her role in the massive mortgage document fraud that plagued this nation. Like England, she stands alone among the multitudes of fraudsters, including those at the highest reaches of the financial industry.</p><p>Brown was the President of DocX, a company that created and processed mortgage-related documents, first as a stand-alone unit, and later as a subsidiary of the document processing giant Lender Processing Solutions (LPS). And like Lynndie England, Brown committed a series of legitimate crimes. From 2003 until 2009, DocX routinely forged mortgage documents.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/shes_paying_for_wall_streets_sins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Unpaid rent can lead to arrest in Arkansas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/report_unpaid_rent_can_lead_to_arrest_in_arkansas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/report_unpaid_rent_can_lead_to_arrest_in_arkansas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hrw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13195343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human Rights Watch finds hundreds of tenants face criminal charges when they fail to vacate ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://hrw.org/node/113160">report</a> published this week by Human Rights Watch (HRW) explores a unique, punitive law in Arkansas that burns hundreds of beleaguered renters in the state every year. According to the 44-page report, “Pay the Rent or Face Arrest: Abusive Impacts of Arkansas’s Criminal Evictions Law,” Arkansas tenants have been "dragged into criminal court for transgressions that would not be a crime in any other U.S. state" under the failure-to-vacate law, which allows criminal charges to be brought against individuals late on rent payments who fail to vacate the rented property. Via HRW:</p><blockquote><p>The failure-to-vacate law was used to bring charges against more than 1,200 Arkansas tenants in 2012 alone. This figure greatly understates the total number of people impacted by the law. The vast majority of tenants scramble to move out when faced with a 10-day notice to vacate rather than face trial — and with good reason.</p> <p>Making matters considerably worse, the law strongly discourages accused tenants from pleading not guilty. Those who do are required to deposit the total amount of rent they allegedly owe with the court, which they forfeit if they are found guilty. Tenants who are unable to deposit the rent amount but plead not guilty anyway face substantially harsher fines and up to 90 days in jail. Tenants who plead guilty face none of this.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/report_unpaid_rent_can_lead_to_arrest_in_arkansas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/report_unpaid_rent_can_lead_to_arrest_in_arkansas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The housing &#8220;recovery&#8221; is a myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_housing_recovery_is_a_myth_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_housing_recovery_is_a_myth_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wall Street is running a new profit game by buying foreclosed homes and renting them back to their former owners]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a></p><p>Every day, it seems a new report comes out praising the ongoing housing recovery. In Georgia, home prices are up 5 percent over last year, a year in which we also had one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country. Seems a little odd, doesn’t it? Don't foreclosures usually drive down the market?</p><p>That’s because the housing “recovery,” as they’re calling it, is fueled almost entirely by Wall Street private equity firms, hedge funds and the Fed's unwavering support. After creating a massive bubble in home prices that eventually burst and caused our economy to go into a tailspin, these guys have decided to come back for more, and figured out a way to profit off their destruction -- by turning foreclosed homes into rentals and securitizing the rental income.</p><p>Many are claiming this is the “private-sector solution” for the recovery we need to get the economy going again. The argument goes that investors snapping up these homes and fixing them up does more for the community than letting the houses just sit there, blighting the neighborhoods and lowering values.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_housing_recovery_is_a_myth_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/the_housing_recovery_is_a_myth_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet NYC&#8217;s first-ever &#8220;microapartments&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/meet_nycs_first_ever_microapartments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/meet_nycs_first_ever_microapartments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The middle class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And you thought all New York real estate was tiny ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last summer, Mayor Michael Bloomberg <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-smallest-apartments-yet-are-being-built-in-new-york-city-and-its-just-300-square-feet-2012-7" target="_blank">unveiled a plan</a> to build the city's first "microapartment" building: 55 rental units, all ranging between 250- to 370-square-feet, a size that was, until recently, illegal under current building code. Bloomberg held an open call for proposals for the fun-sized dwellings, and announced the winning design Tuesday morning.</p><p>A project called My Micro NY from a design team comprised of Monadnock Development, Actors Fund Housing Development Corp. and nArchitects beat out 33 other proposals to win the competition.</p><p>Construction at 335 East 27th Street will start by the end of this year, with move-ins slated for September 2015. In addition to being downright tiny, the building will be the first multi-family building in Manhattan to use prefab construction. The shipping container-esque prefab modules, which will be manufactured by Capsys at its Brooklyn Navy Yard factory, will <em>snap</em> together to form the building.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/meet_nycs_first_ever_microapartments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/meet_nycs_first_ever_microapartments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer finance agency bids to stop predatory lending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new rule forces lenders to take responsibility for their loans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, brainchild of now-Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D.-Mass.), has created the Ability to Repay rule, a set of guidelines for lenders that are designed to protect consumers from predatory lending. The practice of lenders offering mortgages to unqualified homebuyers and then selling the debt to third parties like banks caused the 2008 economic collapse after too many consumers couldn't keep up on their payments.</p><p>Boiled down, the new rules force lenders to take responsibility for the loans they write. It will no longer be possible for lenders to say a customer bears all the responsibility for what they sign. This could curtail overly pushy salesmanship and other lending practices that enabled mortgage lenders to write risky loans before getting them off their books. After the economy cratered there were numerous reports of lenders offering "liar loans" that required minimal or no documentation from customers or deceptively low teaser rates that exploded soon after the loans were signed.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.consumerfinance.gov/blog/assuring-consumers-have-access-to-mortgages-they-can-trust//">agency</a> the Ability to Repay rule requires that:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/consumer_finance_agency_bids_to_stop_predatory_lending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks to pay $10B for foreclosure abuses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/banks_to_pay_10b_for_foreclosure_abuses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/banks_to_pay_10b_for_foreclosure_abuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The settlement will go to Americans who lost their homes or are in danger of losing their homes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following negotiations between government officials and banks, a $10 billion settlement for foreclosure abuses like "flawed paperwork and botched loan modifications" is expected today, the New York Times <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100357141">reported</a>:</p><blockquote><p>An estimated $3.75 billion of the $10 billion will be distributed in cash relief to Americans who went through foreclosure in 2009 and 2010. Another $6 billion will be directed toward homeowners who are in danger of losing their homes after falling behind on their monthly payments. The deal follows a week of feverish negotiations, and it almost fell apart over the weekend. Some officials at the <strong><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/43752521" data-nodeid="43752521">Federal Reserve</a> </strong>threatened to scuttle it unless the banks agreed to pay an additional $300 million for their role in the 2008 financial crisis that torpedoed the housing market and led to millions of foreclosures.</p></blockquote><p>According to the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-mo-banks-settlement-20130106,0,6497379.story">Los Angeles Times</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/banks_to_pay_10b_for_foreclosure_abuses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/banks_to_pay_10b_for_foreclosure_abuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2.5 million jobless adults living with their parents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moody's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moody's Analytics data shows a vast rise in "bundled households" since 2007]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the New York Times' Economix blog <a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/bundled-households/">reported</a> Monday, despite signs of an improving economy, "the bundled-household phenomenon remains large." That is, a large number of adult children have moved back into their parents' house, unable to support independent households. The Times revealed new data from Moody's Analytics:</p><blockquote><p>There are about 17.2 million adult children living in their parents’ homes this year, compared with around 15.3 million in 2007, the year the recession began ... And the numbers show that the greatest increases are accounted for by unemployed adult children who have moved in with parents. In 2007, 1.3 million unemployed adult children were living in their parents’ homes. This year, the total is about 2.5 million.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/2_5_million_jobless_adults_living_with_their_parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More and more families moving in together</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Student Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seniors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Census data shows 4.3 million U.S. households include a parent, a grandparent and a child]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Struggling with the burden of debts and underemployment, a growing number of graduates in the U.S. are moving back in with their parents. Meanwhile, unable to afford independent retirement, seniors are moving into their children's family homes. Census bureau statistics show a 4 percent rise from last year in the number of multi-generational households: 4.3 million U.S. households now include a parent, a grandparent and a child.</p><p>The video below highlights the strength of this trend; housing developers are designing houses under the premise that a young person or grandparent will be moving back in. Watch below (via NewsFix):</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=400&amp;height=255&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517521491'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/more_and_more_families_moving_in_together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US foreclosure filings hit 5-year low</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/us_foreclosure_filings_hit_5_year_low/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/us_foreclosure_filings_hit_5_year_low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On national level foreclosure filings last month fell 16 percent from Sept. 2011]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. foreclosure filings dropped to a five-year low in September as fewer homes were on track to be seized by lenders.</p><p>It was the second-consecutive monthly decline in filings, although there remains a sharp divergence along state lines, according to a report Thursday by foreclosure listing firm RealtyTrac Inc.</p><p>On a national level, overall foreclosure filings last month — including home repossessions — fell 7 percent from August and 16 percent from September 2011. There were 180,427 foreclosure filings reported for September, the fewest since July 2007 in the midst the housing market bust.</p><p>The number of homes entering the foreclosure process, so-called foreclosure starts, fell to 87,066 in September, down 12 percent from August and 15 percent from a year earlier. It was the second-straight month of declines following three months of increases, Irvine, Calif.-based RealtyTrac reported.</p><p>Foreclosure starts since peaked in April 2009 at around 203,000. But the current level is still well above the 34,000 starts recorded in May 2005, before the collapse of the housing market.</p><p>Overall foreclosure filings include notices of defaults on mortgages, scheduled auctions and repossessions. Foreclosure starts are either default notices or scheduled auctions, depending on the state's legal process.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/us_foreclosure_filings_hit_5_year_low/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/us_foreclosure_filings_hit_5_year_low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s hard housing lesson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/obamas_hard_housing_lesson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/obamas_hard_housing_lesson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's botched homeowner rescue enraged both the left and right. But now it's working ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the history of Obama's first term is written, historians will marvel over how quickly the enduring themes of his administration crystallized. Just one month after being inaugurated, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -- his $800 billion stimulus bill. On the next day, Feb. 18, he outlined his plans to help homeowners avoid foreclosure <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-mortgage-crisis ">in a speech in Arizona</a> -- one of the states hit hardest by the housing bust. And on the very next day after that, CNBC's Rick Santelli delivered <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-Jw-5Kx8k">his epic rant</a> attacking Obama's bailout of "losers," and calling for viewers to join him in a "Chicago Tea Party" in protest.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/obamas_hard_housing_lesson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/obamas_hard_housing_lesson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP nightmare: Confident Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/gop_nightmare_confident_americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/gop_nightmare_confident_americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Confidence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Romney is fighting a rising tide of economic good cheer, even if the numbers don't quite justify it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if Mitt Romney's campaign managers didn't have enough to worry about, what with lousy poll numbers, mean Republican pundits, and the 47 percent video backlash, Tuesday morning delivered possibly the worst news yet: confirmation that Americans are feeling better about <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/49162591">the state of the U.S. economy. </a></p><blockquote><p>U.S. consumer confidence jumped to its highest level in seven months in September as Americans were more optimistic about the job market and income prospects, a private sector report showed on Tuesday.</p></blockquote><p>The news confirms what <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-campaign-analysis-20120925,0,1523484.story">media outlets</a> have been reporting for weeks: Romney is fighting a rising tide of economic good cheer. That's dire news for Mitt, since his entire campaign strategy is built on the premise that voters will blame Obama for high unemployment and stagnant economic growth.</p><p>But it also poses a bit of a puzzler. Because, er, unemployment is still stubbornly high and economic growth is very slow. The available data do not support a slam dunk case for brightening economic prospects. Gas prices are up, manufacturing has been slumping for several months, the last monthly jobs report was a disappointment and the number of new jobless claims has risen over the last two weeks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/gop_nightmare_confident_americans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/gop_nightmare_confident_americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House prices rise across the country again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/house_prices_rise_across_the_country_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/house_prices_rise_across_the_country_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case-Schiller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Report shows price climb three months in a row]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — Home prices kept rising in July across the United States, buoyed by greater sales and fewer foreclosures.</p><p>National home prices increased 1.2 percent in July, compared to the same month last year, according to the Standard &amp; Poor’s/Case Shiller index released Tuesday. That’s the second straight year-over-year gain after two years without one.</p><p>The report also says prices rose in July from June in all 20 cities tracked by the index. That’s the third straight month in which prices rose in every city.</p><p>Steady price increases and record-low mortgage rates are helping drive a housing recovery.</p><p>In the 12 months ending in July, prices have risen in 16 of 20 cities. In Phoenix, one of the cities hardest hit by the housing bust, prices are up 16.6 percent in that stretch. Prices in Minneapolis and Detroit have risen more than 6 percent.</p><p>“We are more optimistic about housing,” David Blitzer, chairman of the S&amp;P’s index committee. “Stronger housing numbers are a positive factor for other measures, including consumer confidence.”</p><p>Prices fell from a year earlier in Atlanta, Chicago, New York and Las Vegas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/house_prices_rise_across_the_country_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/house_prices_rise_across_the_country_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama boosted by upbeat housing reports, new polls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/obama_boosted_by_upbeat_housing_reports_new_polls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/obama_boosted_by_upbeat_housing_reports_new_polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama campaign is riding high on the latest polling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh signs of a national housing rebound and growing support in public opinion polls boosted President Barack Obama's bid for a new term in the White House on Wednesday as Republican rival Mitt Romney struggled to quell his video controversy.</p><p>The challenger's attempts to get his campaign back on track ran into new difficulty in the form of criticism from rank-and-file Republicans concerned about their own election prospects in the fall.</p><p>"I have a very different view of the world," said appointed Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada, taking issue with Romney's dismissive comments about the 47 percent of all Americans who pay no income taxes. Separately, Senate GOP leaders avoided answering questions about their presidential candidate at a news conference in the Capitol.</p><p>After days of virtually nonstop political damage control on issues foreign and domestic, Romney assured an audience at a Miami forum that "my campaign is about the 100 percent in America."</p><p>Earlier in the day, at an Atlanta fundraiser, Romney said: "The question of this campaign is not who cares about the poor and the middle class. I do. He (Obama) does. The question is who can help the poor and the middle class. I can. He can't."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/obama_boosted_by_upbeat_housing_reports_new_polls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/obama_boosted_by_upbeat_housing_reports_new_polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. housing policy: &#8220;Absolutely insane&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/absolutely_insane_on_housing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/absolutely_insane_on_housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Financial Protection Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12971486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How far have we gone in fixing the mortgage crisis? We have no idea, because no one's counting foreclosures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were to read the headlines on the ongoing foreclosure crisis, you'd get very confused. Are "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-26/foreclosure-filings-increase-in-60-of-large-u-s-cities.html">Foreclosure Filings Increasing in 60% of Large U.S. Cities</a>," as Bloomberg reports? Are "<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2012/07/31/foreclosure-machines-still-running-on-low/">Foreclosure Machines Still Running on 'Low,'</a>" as the Wall Street Journal says? Or are we in the midst of a "<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505145_162-57480144/foreclosures-surge-in-first-half-of-2012/">Foreclosure Surge</a>," as CBS News would have us believe? The answer, unfortunately, is that we don't really know.</p><p>Six years after the foreclosure crisis began in earnest, as former Congressional Oversight Panel vice chair and current AFL-CIO general counsel Damon Silvers put it, "it's impossible to get reliable, comprehensive information on foreclosures." The government is still not effectively measuring the single biggest weight on the American economy, the foreclosure epidemic that has claimed millions of homes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/absolutely_insane_on_housing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/absolutely_insane_on_housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Banks nix &#8220;risky&#8221; loans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12959159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Banks won't help Obama rescue the underwater homeowners who, a few years ago, they were eager to rip off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's looking more and more like the banking industry might be better off spending the millions that it funnels to lobbyists on some straight-up public relations damage control. Lately, not a day goes by without another bomb dropping. Sometimes it is embarrassingly obvious -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/hsbcs_dark_side_adventures/">money laundering for Mexican drug cartels?!</a> Did HSBC really need to be <em>that</em> obvious? But usually it is a little more subtle.</p><p>For example, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-17/obama-home-refinancing-effort-hits-banks-risk-capacity-limits.html">Bloomberg published an interesting article today</a> detailing bankers' resistance to the White House effort to help underwater homeowners refinance their mortgages. Much to nearly everyone's surprise, the most recent revamping of the administration's homeowner rescue plan is actually showing some healthy signs of progress -- at least if you compare it to the woeful performance of the stillborn White House initiatives prior to the new rollout. Bloomberg reports that by May of this year as many homeowners had already taken advantage of the new rules to refinance their homes as did in all of 2011. A little late in the game to change perceptions that Obama hasn't been doing all he can for homeowners, but still, better late than never for the people who are finally getting some breathing room.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/17/scaredy_cat_banks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking the surface?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12956511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The housing market could be picking up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who hang around these here parts know that I maintain a solidly realistic view of the current economy, both here and abroad.  So if I post something upbeat, let’s be clear: I don’t think we’re out of the woods, I’m not anywhere near satisfied with the pace of job growth, GDP growth, wage and income growth, etc.</p><p>But I have noted some signs that the housing market just might be carving out a <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/stop-the-presses-some-maybe-kinda-sorta-pretty-good-news-from-the-housing-market/">bottom</a>.  And that said, I’ve also noted that any improvement in prices will help ameliorate one of our serious outstanding problems: negative equity in your home.  So, it was with great interest that I read this today, from CoreLogic:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/13/breaking_the_surface_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cities plan for families</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/09/a_new_kind_of_family_planning_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/09/a_new_kind_of_family_planning_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next American City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12952513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are family-friendly cities a worthy goal or a dog whistle for conservatives?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past weekend, Will Doig of Salon wrote an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/30/every_city_needs_a_brand/">article</a> detailing the motivations and challenges of city branding efforts. He spoke with Aaron Renn, an Indianapolis-based urban analyst, concerning the city’s latest efforts to capitalize on what Renn characterizes as a town that has “great schools, is family oriented [sic] and offers easily living.”</p><p><a href="http://www.americancity.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/NAC.jpg" alt="Next American City" align="left" /></a></p><p>Some commenters on Doig’s article seized upon Renn’s assertion that Indianapolis had some vague, inscrutable quality that made it family-friendly.</p><p>When city officials invoke family-friendliness in their advertising strategies, what aspects of the city are they basing that claim on? Arguments from readers fell into three camps: It could be the availability of urban amenities like zoos, museums and public pools that the whole family can enjoy together. Or it might be a dog whistle alerting homebuyers and other in-migrants to the presence of a prevailing conservative cultural sentiment, reminiscent of a kind of “family values” rhetoric. Or it could be suburban-style development with the space and creature comforts demanded by a middle class that’s slowly moving back into cities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/09/a_new_kind_of_family_planning_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/09/a_new_kind_of_family_planning_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big foreclosure payouts, but only for the right wrongs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/big_foreclosure_payouts_but_only_for_the_right_wrongs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/big_foreclosure_payouts_but_only_for_the_right_wrongs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12950423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's possible to receive compensation for wrongful foreclosure, however the amounts vary widely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you put a price on the damage caused by a wrongful foreclosure? Banking regulators have. And it’s $125,000. Or $60,000. Or $15,000. Or… it’s unclear.</p><p>Last November, banking regulators launched a process to force the big banks to compensate homeowners victimized by their foreclosure abuses. <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/flaws-jeopardize-new-attempt-to-help-homeowners">Many crucial details remained unclear</a>, including how much victims might receive.</p><p>More than seven months later, regulators finally released <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/372479-financial-remediation-framework.html">a “framework”</a> that shows some of the possible outcomes. It’s a list of thirteen mortgage servicing “errors,” each with its own associated form of compensation. In addition to fixing the bank’s errors, remedies include cash payments ranging from $500 all the way up to $125,000.</p><p>It turns out that, for homeowners seeking compensation for those errors and abuses, it’s crucially important just how the servicer messed up. The logic for the differences in payment isn’t always apparent and in some instances seems to defy common sense.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/big_foreclosure_payouts_but_only_for_the_right_wrongs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/big_foreclosure_payouts_but_only_for_the_right_wrongs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hard Libor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/hard_libor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/hard_libor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12949754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Libor may be one of the most important financial market statistics you’ve never heard of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did some TV this afternoon on the resignation of the chairman of Barclays Bank as a result of a rate-rigging scandal around the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor" target="_blank">Libor</a>, a key interest rate estimated daily by the London banking sector.</p><p>The Libor may be one of the most important financial market statistics you’ve never heard of.  It’s the rate at which banks trade with each other, but it’s come to be used as a benchmark interest rate on literally trillions of dollars of financial instruments—everything from derivatives, like interest rate swaps, to US mortgages.</p><p>For years, there’s been suspicion that the Libor was being manipulated by the banks that set it each day.  Now, according to the <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/chairman-of-barclays-is-expected-to-resign/" target="_blank">NYT</a>, regulators released evidence supporting those suspicions:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/hard_libor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/hard_libor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signs of life in housing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/signs_of_life_in_housing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/signs_of_life_in_housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12947804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years in the doldrums, is the market finally improving?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been meaning to post these slides I put together for a housing panel last week.  Part of my rap was that there’s some evidence — dare I say it? — that the housing market has finally carved out a bottom.  I know — believe me, I know.  We’ve been here before only to have hopes dashed as home prices take another leg down.  How do I know this time is different?</p><p>I don’t, but I’ve got some indicators that are suggestive that national prices are stabilizing and that supply and demand are better aligned.  That’s not to say you can’t find places that are still over-supplied where prices are declining.  It’s not to say we’ve cleared out the foreclosure pipeline.  And millions remain underwater.</p><p>It’s only to say that we’re finally bumping along the bottom and I’m somewhat confident that national prices have stabilized and will eventually begin to rise. (The NYT takes a similar view <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/28/business/economy/new-indications-housing-recovery-is-under-way.html?ref=business">today</a>…)</p><p>Here’s why.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/signs_of_life_in_housing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/29/signs_of_life_in_housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
