<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > How the World Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/how_the_world_works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A farewell to How the World Works</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/23/farewell_to_how_the_world_works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/23/farewell_to_how_the_world_works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/23/farewell_to_how_the_world_works</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coverage of politics, the economy, and globalization will continue, but the branded blog will not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite six years ago, Salon encouraged me to launch How the World Works, a hybrid blog/column originally envisioned as <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2005/12/07/introduction" class="storyLink">"a conversation about globalization."</a> Some umpteen zillion posts later, the experiment is coming to an end, as part of larger changes at Salon you'll be hearing about soon.</p><p>No, I'm not going anywhere, and yes, I'll still be writing about most of the same things I currently cover (though maybe with a little bit less emphasis on Washington horse-race politics). There are interesting projects in the works, some of which will incorporate more honest-to-goodness reporting than I've been doing for a while. There'll still be an RSS feed for <a href="/writer/andrew_leonard/">everything I write</a>, but it'll be hooked to my byline rather than the title "How the World Works."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/23/farewell_to_how_the_world_works/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/23/farewell_to_how_the_world_works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operation treason?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/operation_twist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/operation_twist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/22/operation_twist</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why markets are tanking: The Fed's new plan admits the economy is in trouble but doesn't come close to fixing it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the stock market reaction is any indicator, the early reviews of Ben Bernanke's latest scheme to juice the economy, "Operation Twist," are negative. At 1 p.m. ET, the Dow Jones industrial average was down nearly 360 points.</p><p>Deciphering investor psychology is never straightforward, and particularly so recently, when there are so many potential reasons for fear and panic: our amazingly dysfunctional U.S. Congress, the ongoing European drama, and the steady drumbeat of negative economic indicators. But today's tremors can be tied to the Fed's announcements on Wednesday fairly easily.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20110921a.htm">statement</a> released by the Federal Open Market Committee was the most downbeat of the entire year to date. After months of telling us that the slowdown was caused by temporary factors that would ameliorate before the end of the year, the Fed was forced to acknowledge that there are "significant downside risks to the economic outlook."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/operation_twist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/operation_twist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s enraging status update</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social media network annoys its users, again, with a confusing revamp. There must be an agenda here, somewhere]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like, oh, around 750 million other users of Facebook, I logged on to the world's biggest social media network this morning and was immediately annoyed. Facebook had changed its user interface, <em>again.</em> Gone was the "Most Recent" button, which allowed users to see what their friends have posted in a simple, straightforward, chronological order. Now Facebook was indulging, <em>again,</em> in outright effrontery: employing its own secret algorithmic sauce to highlight what it considered the most important "top stories," while mixing in other recent posts far below.</p><p>Facebook also added a "Ticker" at the top right hand side of the page, which provided a real-time Twitter-like stream of status updates from all my friends. When I first checked it, it was packed with complaints about the new interface change. Judging solely from comments from <em>my</em> friends, people don't want Facebook deciding what's most important, Facebook's suggestions were wrong, irrelevant and insulting, and why oh why oh why can't Facebook leave a good thing alone?</p><p>Oh, and people hate change. And, goddammit, they're switching to Google+ (which conveniently opened its doors to the general public today), or Twitter, or giving up on the Internet altogether.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/facebook_annoys_users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Google deserve the Microsoft treatment?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The search engine giant is feeling the antitrust heat. Not all of it is justified -- but some is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what happens when one company controls <a href="http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-03-03/tech/29988796_1_google-tv-google-s-share-android-apps">40 percent</a> of the $30 billion U.S. online advertising market and <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2108991/August-2011-Search-Engine-Share-from-comScore-Hitwise">65 percent of online search.</a> The knives come out -- and they're sharp.</p><p>It's been a long year for Google. In February, European antitrust regulators <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368715,00.asp">launched an investigation</a> into whether Google was using its search results to privilege its own services over those of competitors. In June, the Federal Trade Commission started looking into whether Google's relationship with handset manufacturers using the Android operating system <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904823804576500544082214566.html?mod=rss_Technology">improperly promoted Google search.</a> In August, Texas's state attorney general <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368715,00.asp">joined the fun.</a> And on Wednesday, Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt <a href="http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=3d9031b47812de2592c3baeba64d93cb">will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee's</a> subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition, and Consumer Rights. The name of the hearing: "The Power of Google: Serving Consumers or Threatening Competition?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/21/google_is_not_the_new_microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Granholm&#8217;s plan to fix America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/jennifer_granholm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/jennifer_granholm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Granholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/19/jennifer_granholm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Michigan governor bears globalization's worst scars, but still itches for a fight. Watch out, Rick Perry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer Granholm, the former governor of Michigan, has a story she likes to tell about the Chinese. Granholm visited China in March. At one meet-and-greet, a Chinese official buttonholed her and asked when the U.S. was going to implement a national energy policy. By her own account, Granholm hemmed and hawed, mentioning the rise of the Tea Party and the inability of the current Congress "to get its act together."</p><p>Granholm and I are sitting in a corner office of a building on the University of California at Berkeley campus, where Granholm is spending a year of "sabbatical." She leans over her desk, looks me in the eye, and demonstrates how the the Chinese official rubbed his hands together like a kid unable to contain his glee right before unwrapping Christmas presents. "'Take your time,' he tells me," says Granholm. "'Take your time.'"</p><p>She shakes her head as if in disbelief at how short-sighted the American political establishment has become. Her point is obvious, and oft-repeated during the course of our interview: In a globalized world, the U.S. economy will not thrive unless we get serious about targeting strategically important sectors of the economy. The rest of the world is playing the economic development game for keeps, while the U.S. seems willing to abandon the board all together.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/jennifer_granholm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/jennifer_granholm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot spots of the Great Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/hot_spots_of_the_great_recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/hot_spots_of_the_great_recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/16/hot_spots_of_the_great_recession</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States with high jobless rates are populous and politically important. States with low rates are neither]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can we learn about the Great Recession from Friday's release of <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm">state unemployment numbers?</a> Overall, not a whole lot changed in August from July: 26 states reported unemployment rate increases, 12 states recorded rate decreases, and 12 states reported no change at all.</p><p>But a look inside the numbers, at the five worst and five best states, is unhappily revealing. The states with the five highest unemployment rates are Nevada (13.4 percent), California (12.1 percent), Michigan (11.2 percent), South Carolina (11.1 percent) and Florida (10.7 percent.) Nevada, California, Michigan and South Carolina all registered unemployment increases in August, compared to July. Florida held even.</p><p>The states with the lowest unemployment rates are North Dakota (3.5 percent), Nebraska (4.2 percent), South Dakota (4.7 percent), New Hampshire (5.3 percent) and Oklahoma (5.6 percent.)</p><p>The combined population of the five worst states: 73,864,261.</p><p>The combined population of the five best states: 8,380,933.</p><p>The unavoidable conclusion: Unemployment is bad and getting worse in some of the most highly populated regions of the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/hot_spots_of_the_great_recession/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/hot_spots_of_the_great_recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third World considers rescuing First World</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/third_world_to_rescue_first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/third_world_to_rescue_first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/15/third_world_to_rescue_first</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heaving a deep sigh, a group of nations full of poor people discuss lending a helping hand to rich Europeans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it's because I've been reading Charles Mann's terrific new book, "1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus Created," and my head is full of all the horrors (ecological, genocidal, etc.) knowingly and unknowingly inflicted on the rest of the planet by Europeans. But I just can't get over the enormous, ironic implications of the news that representatives of some of the world's biggest up-and-coming developing countries are busily thinking of ways to help Europe find a way out of its troubles.</p><p>The Financial Times' Joe Leahy <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/be6357a2-de28-11e0-9fb7-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Xrc5RgVn">reports from Sao Paulo:</a></p><blockquote> <p>Officials from the leading emerging market economies will meet in Washington next week to discuss potential joint action to help the crisis-hit eurozone, said Guido Mantega, Brazil's finance minister. The idea will be discussed at a meeting of the finance ministers and central bank governors of the "Bric" nations -- Brazil, Russia, India and China, plus South Africa -- on Thursday.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/third_world_to_rescue_first/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/third_world_to_rescue_first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s bad jobs trade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/obama_economy_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/obama_economy_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/14/obama_economy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medicare cuts to pay for a stimulus plan that voters don't think will work? No wonder his poll numbers are dropping]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The juxtaposition of two Wednesday headlines does not bode well for President Obama:</p><p>From Bloomberg: <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-14/obama-approval-drops-on-skepticism-of-jobs-plan.html">"Obama Approval Plummets to New Low Among Americans Skeptical of Jobs Plan."</a></p><p>From the Financial Times: <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e25b25dc-de40-11e0-9fb7-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Xrc5RgVn">"Obama to Propose Medicare and Medicaid Cuts."</a></p><p>When you are proposing cuts to programs American voters like in order to pay for an initiative that American voters don't think will work, you're in trouble. Even in the unlikely event that Congress approves Obama's job plan, there's still a worst case scenario: The economy doesn't improve, and Republicans running for president get to blame Obama both for high unemployment <em>and</em> for cutting Medicare.</p><p>Digging into a couple of other polls that also show growing dissatisfaction with Obama, the Washington Post's Greg Sargent argues that the real takeaway should be that voters are unhappy with the economy, and not the jobs plan. When broken down into its constituent parts, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/the-big-disconnect-americans-pessimistic-of-obama-on-economy-but-support-his-actual-policies/2011/03/03/gIQAthFnPK_blog.html">the American Jobs Act polls well.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/obama_economy_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/obama_economy_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Wall Street so afraid of Europe?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/europe_and_the_stock_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/europe_and_the_stock_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/14/europe_and_the_stock_market</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because what happens in Germany and Greece is a bigger threat to the U.S. economy than anything Congress could do]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sense of panic and confusion in Europe seems to grow by the hour. Let's review the last day or so of events.</p><ul> <li>Germany's economics minister warned that, to save the euro, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904265504576568693911614726.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection">Greece might have to go through some sort of "insolvency procedure."</a> Bloomberg News promptly <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-12/greece-s-risk-of-default-increases-to-98-as-european-debt-crisis-deepens.html">reported</a> that there is now a "98 percent" probability that Greece will default.</li> <li>An Italian bond sale went badly, forcing Italy's borrowing costs <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-13/italy-sells-5-3-billion-of-bonds-as-borrowing-costs-climb-demand-drops.html">sharply higher.</a> Investors were heartened, however, by the news that Italy's foreign minister was begging China to bail out the country <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/90c4c7f6-dd54-11e0-9dac-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Xrc5RgVn">with a significant investment.</a>&#160;This was the same foreign minister who had previously warned against China's "reverse colonialism."</li> <li>The price of insuring against the default of bonds issued by Portugal, Italy and France <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/fa4a9090-dcfd-11e0-b4f2-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Xrc5RgVn">jumped.</a></li> <li>Bank stocks in France <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/09/13/frances-banks-lose-their-street-cred/">tanked.</a> French banks own about $57 billion in Greek debt -- and much, much more in Spanish and Italian debt.</li> <li>German Chancellor Angela Merkel smacked down her own economics minister, and declared that she wouldn't allow Greece to go into "uncontrolled insolvency."</li> <li>"I think we will do Greece the biggest favor by not speculating much, but instead encouraging Greece to implement the commitments it has made," <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904265504576568693911614726.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection">Ms. Merkel told RBB Inforadio,</a> a public broadcaster in the Berlin region. "What we don't need is unrest in the financial markets -- the uncertainties are already big enough," she said.</li> <li>Merkel's promise calmed the waters -- for the moment. French bank stocks -- and the U.S. stock market -- suddenly rebounded.</li> </ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/europe_and_the_stock_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/europe_and_the_stock_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hourglass economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/13/the_hourglass_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/13/the_hourglass_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/13/the_hourglass_economy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New poverty figures show a big jump in the number of poorest Americans. Meanwhile, the middle class is disappearing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday morning's <a href="http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb11-157.html">release of poverty data</a> from the Census Bureau confirms what many critics of growing income inequality already knew: The United States is doing a better and better job imitating the social stratification of what we used to call, dismissively, "third world" countries.</p><p>The poverty rate in 2010 rose to an embarrassing 15.1 percent, up from 14.3 percent in 2009. "There were 46.2 million people in poverty in 2010, up from 43.6 million in 2009 -- the fourth consecutive annual increase and the largest number in the 52 years for which poverty estimates have been published," reported the Census Bureau.</p><p>The poverty threshold for a family of four in 2010 was $22,314. Overall, real median household income declined by 2.3 percent in 2010.</p><p>Put these numbers together with what we already <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/07/opinion/07kristof.html">know</a> about how <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/opinion/sunday/jobs-will-follow-a-strengthening-of-the-middle-class.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">the rich are faring</a> in the U.S. -- the top 10th of 1 percent takes home about 24 percent of all American wealth -- and we have stunning confirmation of what a Citigroup analyst has labeled the "consumer hourglass economy." &#160;The wealthy are doing fine, while the number of those living in poverty grows, and the middle ... the middle is just disappearing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/13/the_hourglass_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/13/the_hourglass_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of the line for Greece?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/greece_end_game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/greece_end_game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/12/greece_end_game</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Europe doesn't want to play the bailout game anymore. That decision may be regretted, later]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Greece approaching the end of the line? Judging by a lengthy and detailed <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,785690,00.html">article in Spiegel, "Germany Plans for Possible Greece Default,"</a> getting passed around Monday by econobloggers like a eurozone-destroying hot potato, the answer is yes. Germany's patience -- never much to begin with -- has run out. There is no way that Greece will be able to keep to the terms of its ongoing bailout, and the support spigot appears finally about to run dry. So one way or another, the country will default. The only question is whether it does so as a member of the eurozone, or as a refugee.</p><p>Many observers have been predicting this end game since the beginning of Europe's sovereign debt crisis, if only because the austerity forced upon Greece by the terms of its bailout has so damaged the Greek economy as to make it impossible for the country to grow at all. But whatever might or might not happen to Greece has never been the primary cause for concern. European banks own lots and lots of Greek debt. What happens to those banks when Greece defaults?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/greece_end_game/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/greece_end_game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons for Obama from the New Deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/the_new_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/the_new_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/12/the_new_deal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of a new book on how FDR changed America connects the dots to our current plight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the current crop of Republican presidential candidates tours the United States denouncing Big Government in language virulent enough to make Barry Goldwater quail, it seems almost impossible to recall that once upon a time American voters endorsed the principle of strong government action by propelling Franklin D. Roosevelt to landslide victory after landslide victory. The contrast is heightened further when one considers how difficult it has been for the current president, who, like Roosevelt, came into office during a time of great economic crisis and on the heels of a thoroughly discredited Republican Party, to move his own agenda through Congress.</p><p>FDR's New Deal remains the standard by which all Democratic presidents are judged. The government put millions of Americans directly to work building roads and bridges and schools that still exist today. The creation of Social Security established the underpinnings of a safety net for all Americans. Wall Street's tendency to excess and destructive speculation was reined in by the Securities Exchange Act and the banking system stabilized for generations by federal deposit insurance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/the_new_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/the_new_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Obama can do on jobs right now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_without_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_without_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/09/obama_jobs_without_congress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Congress balks at the president's agenda, here are four ways to boost employment that are ready to go ASAP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/opinion/setting-their-hair-on-fire.html?_r=2">Liberals</a> aren't the only Americans making approving noises about the American Jobs Act <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_speech/index.html">rolled out by President Obama</a> Thursday night. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/09/us-obama-jobs-economy-idUSTRE7881C920110909">Private economic forecasters</a> are also giving it <a href="http://www.gazette.com/articles/positive-124636-economists-reviews.html">a thumbs up:</a> Moody Analytics' Mark Zandi went so far as to predict the plan would add two million jobs.</p><p>But you'll be hard pressed to find <em>anyone</em> who thinks Congress will pass the president's plan in anything close to the shape he outlined. Which leaves us with a familiar question: What can President Obama do to boost jobs <em>without</em> Congress?</p><p>Here are four ideas:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_without_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_without_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to GOP: Pass this bill now!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/09/obama_jobs_speech</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president kicks off the 2012 campaign with a jobs proposal that excites Democrats and has no chance of passing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the good news: Liberals who were looking for Obama to "go big" -- to make an aggressive case for immediate action on unemployment and to use his bully pulpit to "change the political conversation" -- got more or less what they wanted from the president's jobs speech on Thursday night. The Nation's Ari Berman captured the tone of a lot of liberal tweeting in the immediate aftermath of the speech: <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/AriBerman/status/111947989513289729">"This was the Obama we've all been waiting for."</a></p><p>The president called for new infrastructure spending, new incentives to encourage businesses to hire, extended and expanded payroll tax cuts for both employers and the employed, help for homeowners who want to refinance their mortgages, and more aid to state and local government. All together, he outlined <a href="http://www.sulia.com/channel/obama-s-job-speech/?featured=b848065d-8523-4ba8-89de-0691c3105455&amp;source=twitter">a reasonably hefty set of proposals.</a> He never specified a price tag, but <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daniel-gross/obama-goes-big-political-450-billion-stimulus-plan-223826914.html">leaks before the speech</a> suggested that the total cost would come in around $450 billion -- which the president promised would be paid for by additional long-term budget cuts tacked on top of the totals already agreed to by Congress during the debt ceiling negotiations, as well as by higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_speech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/09/obama_jobs_speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>174</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Obama should do on jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/what_obama_should_do_on_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/what_obama_should_do_on_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/08/what_obama_should_do_on_jobs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP will refuse to budge, but the president can change the political conversation. Here's how]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody's got an opinion about what kind of measures President Obama should propose tonight to address the unemployment crisis, but the folks at the Economic Policy Institute went to the trouble of coming up with <a href="http://w3.epi-data.org/temp2011/BriefingPaper325.pdf">a detailed 11-point plan.</a> Salon contacted one of the authors of the report, economist Josh Bivens, to get his direct take on what Obama should do, and, probably more to the point, what he <em>can</em> do.</p><p>     <strong>What are the most potent things President Obama could do to boost job creation?</strong>   </p><p>No. 1, we need to extend unemployment insurance when it runs out at the end of this year. Not doing that would not just cut off desperate people; it would also be a really bad anti-stimulus for the economy. Unemployment insurance is very good economic stimulus. It gets spent right away and supports jobs throughout the economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/what_obama_should_do_on_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/what_obama_should_do_on_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bungled politics of bank bashing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/fhfa_lawsuit_against_banks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/fhfa_lawsuit_against_banks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/06/fhfa_lawsuit_against_banks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government finally accuses Wall Street of mortgage fraud, and then buries the news]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, right before a three-day weekend, the Federal Housing Finance Agency filed 17 lawsuits <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/business/bank-suits-over-mortgages-are-filed.html">accusing a motley crew of some of the biggest financial institutions in the United States</a> of fraudulently misrepresenting the value of mortgage-backed securities. Pick any one of the lawsuits, for example, <a href="http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/22595/FHFA%20v%20Merrill%20Lynch.pdf">the complaint against Merrill Lynch,</a> and you will read language sure to get the heart pumping of any American still seething at the role Wall Street played in precipitating the Great Recession:</p><blockquote> <p>These securities were sold pursuant to registration statements, including prospectuses and prospectus supplements that formed part of those registration statements, which <strong>contained materially false or misleading statements and omissions.</strong> Defendants <strong>falsely represented</strong> that the underlying mortgage loans complied with certain underwriting guidelines and standards, including representations that significantly overstated the ability of the borrowers to repay their mortgage loans.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/fhfa_lawsuit_against_banks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/fhfa_lawsuit_against_banks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big squeeze on labor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/05/the_big_squeeze_on_labor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/05/the_big_squeeze_on_labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/05/the_big_squeeze_on_labor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can one government agency give unions a leg up, and resist the power of globalization and technological progress?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American workers don't have much to celebrate this Labor Day. Unemployment is high, the strength of organized labor is abysmally low, and the prospect of meaningful political action on the jobs front is nonexistent.</p><p>There is, however, one government agency attempting to do its part to boost union power in the United States, in the best tradition of the principles that theoretically underlie Labor Day. The NLRB, a relic of the New Deal empowered to enforce the National Labor Relations Act, has been a busy bee. In recent weeks, the NLRB <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/31/business/economy/nlrb-eases-unionizing-at-nursing-homes.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">has issued a series of rulings,</a> that, taken together, make it a little easier for workers to unionize, and a little harder to roll back unions that are already in place.</p><p>Most controversially, the NLRB has also brought <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/21/business/21boeing.html?scp=2&amp;sq=dreamliner&amp;st=cse">a complaint against Boeing,</a> claiming that the airplane manufacturer's decision to locate a plant in South Carolina represented an illegal reprisal against its unionized workforce in Washington. The decision precipitated a storm of outrage from the right, and even inspired befuddlement and sharp criticism from commentators not normally associated with the crowd that automatically sees socialism in Obama's every eyebrow twitch.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/05/the_big_squeeze_on_labor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/05/the_big_squeeze_on_labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs report: A big fat zero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/august_jobs_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/august_jobs_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/09/02/august_jobs_report</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cue the double-dip recession siren. The U.S. economy created no new jobs in August]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big fat zero. If you were looking for the most concise possible description of the United States economy, there you have it: On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. economy <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">added <em>no</em> jobs in August.</a></p><p>One huge caveat: The Verizon strike in August accounted for a net (and temporary) loss of 45,000 jobs. If you add to the calculation the 17,000 jobs shed by government, then the U.S. economy registered a net gain of 62,000 private sector jobs, which, while not robust by any means, still suggests there are some feeble signs of growth visible in the U.S. economy</p><p>Elsewhere, the report screamed stagnation, except where it documented decline.</p><p>The unemployment rate stayed steady at 9.1 percent. The number of long-term unemployed held at an appalling 6 million. The labor force participation rate and employment-population ratio were unchanged -- both strong indicators of an economy trapped in quicksand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/august_jobs_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/02/august_jobs_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solyndra&#8217;s industrial policy power failure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/solyndra_goes_bankrupt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/solyndra_goes_bankrupt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/08/31/solyndra_goes_bankrupt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2010 Obama touted the Silicon Valley solar startup as a green jobs powerhouse. But China had other plans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For green technology fans, the news that the thin-film solar startup Solyndra is going belly up is one heck of a bummer. Purely in symbolic terms, the failure of the highly touted Silicon Valley showcase is a disaster. Headquartered in Fremont, Calif., Solyndra was backed by name-brand venture capitalists and received half a billion dollars in loan guarantees from the Obama administration. In a visit in 2010, Obama personally touted the company as a source of green jobs. Oops.</p><p>Conservatives always warn liberals that "industrial policy" is misguided because the government doesn't have the capacity to successfully pick winners. Solyndra would seem to offer dramatic support for that view. But the real story isn't quite so simple.</p><p>As usual, ace green tech reporter Todd Woody <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/toddwoody/2011/08/31/what-solyndras-bankruptcy-means-for-silicon-valley-solar-startups/">provided one of the best early takes on what it all means</a>:</p><p>The key graph:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/solyndra_goes_bankrupt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/solyndra_goes_bankrupt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: The catastrophe president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/obama_the_disaster_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/obama_the_disaster_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/08/30/obama_the_disaster_president</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FEMA disaster declarations set a record in 2011. The right cries socialism, but global warming is the real culprit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the end of August 2011, President Barack Obama had already made <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/08/30/12-states-with-the-most-disaster-declarations-in-2011">181 FEMA disaster declarations,</a> solidly smashing the record 157 declarations made by Bill Clinton in 1996.</p><p>For some on the right, it's all about the relentless expansion of Big Government -- the <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/08/28/cantor-demands-common-sense-spending-cuts-in-exchange-for-more-fema-aid/">"federalization of fairly routine disasters,"</a> as Matt Mayer, the president of the conservative think tank Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, wrote in a blog post for the Heritage Foundation website.</p><p>We can leave it to residents of Vermont to decide whether the flooding in the aftermath of Hurricane Irene qualifies as "routine" or not, but there's also another explanation: 2011 has been a banner year for disasters, period. By mid-year, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=noaa-makes-2011-most-extreme-weather-year">according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration</a>, 2011 was already one of the most extreme -- and costly -- years on record. And that was before Hurricane Irene.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/obama_the_disaster_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/obama_the_disaster_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
