<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > I Like to Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/i_like_to_watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How to make it in America&#8221;: Hanging with the have-nots</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/14/how_to_make_it_in_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/14/how_to_make_it_in_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To Make It In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entourage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/13/how_to_make_it_in_america</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HBO's new urban dramedy imagines "Entourage" without the cash or the fame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who tricked us into thinking that creativity was the holy grail of personal achievement?</p><p>Everyone wants to be creative <em>and</em> successful these days. "I want to create something <em>lasting</em>," they say, as if writing another out-of-print book or throwing up another album on iTunes might beat back mortality's inexorable creep.</p><p>Of course, most of us aren't preoccupied with our legacy so much as disturbed by the pointlessness of most other options. Let's see, I can create something meaningful and expressive, or I can help some company that creates a disposable product trick the world into buying it.</p><p>What no one tells you, of course, is that the former inevitably turns into the latter. No sooner have you put the finishing touches on your masterpiece than a phalanx of professionally smooth humans gathers to discuss how to peddle your brand to the appropriate demographic. "Who <em>is</em> your demographic, do you think?" they'll ask you.</p><p><em>I don't know</em>, you'll answer. Crazy people? Angry people? People who just want to create something lasting but end up pissing away their prime in extended Twitter exchanges and tedious teleconferencing calls?</p><p>     <strong>Desperately seeking status</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/14/how_to_make_it_in_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/14/how_to_make_it_in_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Private Practice&#8221;: How many adorable children must die?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/private_practice_suffer_the_little_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/private_practice_suffer_the_little_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/11/private_practice_suffer_the_little_children</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sick kids have overtaken this soapy "Grey's" spinoff, where every week brings tears and a parent's worst nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many adorable, saucer-eyed children are going to have to suffer and die and get torn from Mommy's arms before this thing is through? That's what I ask myself every time I find myself watching "<strong>Private Practice</strong>" (10 p.m. Thursdays on ABC), the flashier, cheesier, stupider cousin of "Grey's Anatomy" that serves up a big, fat slice of Parental Nightmare Porn every week -- you know, for the masochist that lives deep inside every last one of us.</p><p>Sure, it starts out innocently enough. "Addy" (Addison, played by Kate Walsh) is dashing around the medical offices where she works, and she bumps into some snag: the practice's budget is in the red or someone forgot to make more coffee in the break room or someone's wife stopped by to call her a whore. Addy doesn't take kindly to such stressors &#8211; you'll recall that her character moved from Seattle Grace (on "Grey's") down to sunny L.A. for a change of scenery, <em>and</em> so Shonda Rhimes could build a whole new show around a manic, eye-rolling, sexually compulsive redhead who's also &#8211; you guessed it &#8211; <em>the best gynecological surgeon anywhere in the known universe</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/private_practice_suffer_the_little_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/private_practice_suffer_the_little_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Lost&#8221;: Caught in the maze of questions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/10/lost_recap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/10/lost_recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/10/lost_recap</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final season of the island thriller unravels in our clutches. So why can't we look away?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did a character-driven drama with metaphysical undertones and a sociopolitical allegory at its core slowly devolve into a maze of dead ends and lingering questions? And how is it that every question posed on "<strong>Lost</strong>" (9 p.m. Tuesdays on ABC) is answered with another question?</p><p>These are the questions, questions, questions that haunt us when Tuesday night's second episode of the final season of "Lost" begins &#8211; yes &#8211; with even more questions: How did Sayid come back to life? "What happened to me?" he asks, and then "Who are these people? What do they want?"</p><p>"It's the Others, dude," Hurley answers. "They caught us ... again."</p><p>Oh dear. It's the Others (again), and they caught us (again). And just in case the repetitive nature of this show is, ahem, lost on you, the entire episode seems to be made up of nothing but questions.</p><p>"Who are you? Why are you holding us here?"</p><p>"I just lied to him, didn't I?"</p><p>"So did they tell you why they burnt me with a hot poker?"</p><p>"Who do you care about, Kate?"</p><p>"So, what happened to your handcuffs?"</p><p>"Why are they after you? What did you do?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/10/lost_recap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/10/lost_recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Super Bowl? Alternatives to the big game</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/06/super_bowl_alternatives</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-fan's TV survival guide to the most epic day in football]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us will take part in any function, holiday or yearly tradition that involves melted cheese and requires sitting in one place for four to eight hours, moving only to retrieve refreshments and/or scold anyone blocking the television set.</p><p>Thankfully, even small children and needy house pets seem to have an intuitive grasp of the divine nature of the Super Bowl, during which adults reserve the right to distractedly mumble and gorge themselves all afternoon while staring at the TV.</p><p>Unfortunately, the game itself frequently sucks. But don't let that rob you of your one big chance to shut out the world and stare, slack-jawed, at a five-hour-long televisual sporting spectacle. Why, when the game gets dull, why not flip over to ...</p><p>     <strong>The Puppy Bowl</strong>   </p><p>Maybe the men in shiny white tights no longer seem like adequate visual eye candy to match your outsize libido, or maybe you're so old that what really makes your heartbeat race uncontrollably at this point is the sight of a 4-month old Chihuahua-pug mix, clumsily chasing a squeaky football toy across the goal line while a 3-month-old Lab-collie mix pounces on her own tail. Does this mean you're a sad shell of your former self, or does it simply mean that you're finally mature enough to acknowledge that nothing can make you lose sight of your own mortality quite as quickly as the sight of baby animals cavorting?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Undercover Boss&#8221;: Capitalist fairy tale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/cbs_undercover_boss_fairy_tale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/cbs_undercover_boss_fairy_tale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undercover Boss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/03/cbs_undercover_boss_fairy_tale</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an age of executive excess, this series is a poignant exercise in make-believe for the underpaid working classes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a time when the gap between executive pay and the average worker's salary is painfully wide, CBS presents "<strong>Undercover Boss</strong>" (premieres Sunday, Feb. 7, after the Super Bowl), a touching fairy tale in which the boss man does menial labor shoulder to shoulder with his anonymous underlings. Of course, the real point of CBS's make-believe isn't to show how much the common man suffers from the indignities and injustices of blue-collar and administrative white-collar jobs -- although we do get some seriously depressing glimpses at the lifestyles of the not so rich and not so famous. No, the real point here is to demonstrate that the big man in the suit and tie is just <em>regular folks</em> like you and me -- you know, except for the fact that he spends half his day golfing and has about a thousand times more cash at his disposal at any given moment than we do.</p><p>Oh yeah, and his back hurts like crazy when he's on his feet all day. In other words, you'd have to have ice water flowing through your veins not to enjoy this elaborate P.R. experiment in spite of yourself. It's pretty tough to resist the heartwarming tale of Larry O'Donnell, president of Waste Management, who gamely agrees to pretend to be a new hire named Randy Lawrence who's training in several different low-level positions within his company. Larry is eager, he says, to get a closer look at how the business functions and what the experience of working its lower-level positions might be like.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/cbs_undercover_boss_fairy_tale/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/cbs_undercover_boss_fairy_tale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Lost&#8221;: Pass me whatever the smoke monster is smoking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/lost_premiere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/lost_premiere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/03/lost_premiere</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Characters die, live again and exist in two different realities. Let the final season of island foolishness begin!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <em>(Warning: Spoilers to Tuesday night's final season premiere of "Lost" included here, so don't read this if you haven't seen the premiere yet.)</em>   </p><p>Once at an open mike night I attended at a bar on Haight Street in San Francisco, a guy in a tie-dyed T-shirt pounded his fingers onto an electric keyboard, then screeched into the microphone, "The first rule is that <em>there are no rules</em>!"</p><p>But do things really get any more interesting when there are no rules? That's the question that arose in the pained faces of the audience gathered in the bar that night, and it's the question that came up during Tuesday night's final season premiere of ABC's acclaimed series "<strong>Lost</strong>" (8 p.m. Tuesdays), a show that, despite its rabid fan base, sometimes feels like the televisual equivalent of a keyboard-pounding poet. Although the "Lost" writers will mostly be praised for inventively throwing out the rules of time and space in order to keep things interesting going into the show's home stretch, their maneuvers sometimes feel about as mysterious and thoughtful as yelling into a microphone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/lost_premiere/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/lost_premiere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to Watch: &#8220;La La Land&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/what_to_watch_la_la_land/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/what_to_watch_la_la_land/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La La Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/01/what_to_watch_la_la_land</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday night's episode of Marc Wootton's hilarious Showtime comedy will make you laugh until you hate yourself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you've ever had an urge to push your rock-climbing buddy off the nearest cliff, then this very special murder-themed episode of Showtime's "<strong>La La Land"</strong>&#160;(11 p.m. Mondays) is just for you. Previewed in exquisite detail <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/iltw/2010/01/23/la_la_land/index.html">here</a>, the second episode of Marc Wootton's stunning "Borat"-like comedy show is so deliciously evil that you simply cannot miss it, from the moment when an unwitting producer gives aspiring filmmaker Brendan Allen's plan to catch "blood splattering on the lens" a thumbs up to the deeply uncomfortable denouement, in which local park rangers arrive at the scene.</p><p>For a taste of the madness, here's a snippet of Allen from last week's episode:</p><p>     <object height="300" width="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2jAwnlnPoNE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="300" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2jAwnlnPoNE&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/what_to_watch_la_la_land/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/01/what_to_watch_la_la_land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Digital Nation&#8221;: What has the Internet done to us?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/31/frontline_digital_nation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/31/frontline_digital_nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/30/frontline_digital_nation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're Googling ourselves stupid. Even tech guru Douglas Rushkoff has regrets. PBS investigates our Information Age]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 15 years of bloviating, looks like we've finally entered the information age. Back in 1996, when I worked at Suck.com in the offices of HotWired, the online offshoot of Wired magazine, our brightly hued warehouse was abuzz with overcaffeinated worker bees high on the limitless possibilities of the Internets. Every 20-something in San Francisco went from being unemployed (post-recession) to dreaming big. Why, we could write stuff about Burning Man and rock climbing, and people would pay us for it! We could learn HTML or (gasp) become middle managers!</p><p>The "big idea" guys, high on more than the Internets, called big meetings so they could rhapsodize on creating virtual communities and breaking down traditional Western phallocentric patriarchies and enabling subcultures to reach out and robustly interface with like-minded hives.</p><p>My bosses at Suck.com, meanwhile, accurately predicted that the Web would soon become something between a <a href="http://www.suck.com/daily/96/03/25/">gigantic mall</a> catering to the lowest common denominator and an <a href="http://www.suck.com/daily/98/07/10/">infinite tabloid echo chamber</a>. Their mantra: Sell out early and often. Why? Because those of us musing about murderous robot showdowns (or scratching out <a href="http://www.suck.com/daily/1999/05/12/">angry cartoons</a> under a <a href="http://www.suck.com/fish/contributors/havrilesky/">pseudonym</a>, for that matter) would all go back to grabbing ankle for The Man sooner than we thought.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/31/frontline_digital_nation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/31/frontline_digital_nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Jersey Shore&#8221;: The wisdom of Snooki</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/jersey_shore_the_wisdom_of_snooki/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/jersey_shore_the_wisdom_of_snooki/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey Shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/27/jersey_shore_the_wisdom_of_snooki</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Chance the Gardener from "Being There," MTV's reality star offers timeless insights into the human condition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, Nicole "Snooki" Polizzi looks like just another unseemly glob of dimwitted detritus to wash up on our pop cultural shores during this depraved time. How did this odd human being, with her disturbing gigantic bouffant and her black-studded clothing and her enormous hoop earings, how did this person who walks around making unhinged sounds about partying and guidos and Poughkeepsie, become a household name? How is it possible that the tabloids are actually following the star of MTV's <strong>"Jersey Shore"</strong> around, taking pictures of her, like anyone cares? How do we live in a world where this strange creature is slated to report live for MTV from the red carpet at the Grammys?</p><p>Assuming that I must be missing something, I took a closer look at this phenomenon that answers to the name of "Snooki." Imagine my delight in discovering that every single word out of Snooki's mouth is rich with metaphor! Remember Peter Sellers' simple-minded gardener, Chance, in the 1979 comedy "Being There," whose statements ("As long as the roots are not severed, all is well") were revealed to be cunning explorations of larger philosophical and socioeconomic themes? Snooki is just like that, but with bigger hair.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/jersey_shore_the_wisdom_of_snooki/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/27/jersey_shore_the_wisdom_of_snooki/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Damages&#8221;: Return of the dragon lady</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/damages_season_three/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/damages_season_three/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/24/damages_season_three</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Season 3 of FX's rich, complex thriller, enigmatic villainess Patty Hewes is more unpredictable than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The third season of FX's "<strong>Damages</strong>" opens like a love story: Here's Patty Hewes (Glenn Close), smiling and laughing and charming a table full of people at a fancy restaurant as swooning, romantic music plays. Finally Patty gets up, and a strange man approaches her.</p><p>"I've been sitting at that table all night hoping to get you alone," the man says to Patty.</p><p>Patty assumes that they've met before and she's forgotten his name. ("Oh, of course! Julian. And remind me what you do?") Julian quickly hints that they haven't met, but his intentions still aren't clear. "Must be exhausting, wearing that mask," he says, "always having to play the role of Patty Hewes."</p><p>"It's not a mask, what you see is what you get," Patty says lightly.</p><p>Julian isn't convinced, but we still don't understand what he wants from her. What is he trying to pull, anyway? <em>Why is he acting like he has her number?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/damages_season_three/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/25/damages_season_three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;La La Land&#8221;: Move over, Borat!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/24/la_la_land/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/24/la_la_land/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La La Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/23/la_la_land</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Wootton's dark, elaborately planned stunt comedy will make you laugh until it hurts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last 50 years, the American dream has shifted from the tangible realm of grassy front lawns and modest bungalows to something far more aspirational and evanescent, the notion that we might transcend the slog of ordinary life with some hazy blend of creative self-involvement and champagne at <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/sundance_film_festival/index.html">Sundance</a>. The unspoken promise of a million social networking tools is that, with the right connections, we could all live like Steven Spielberg, briefly delivering a few choice words of wisdom about -- what else? -- the contents of our glorious heads, before returning home to our immaculate, spacious, shining palaces on the hill.</p><p>Back in reality, creative professionals of every stripe are pegged with the word "aspiring" well past their prime. Told again and again that every step forward requires the kindness of strangers, they reach self-consciously through the Internets toward strangers (who are, themselves, perpetually "aspiring") whose best advice is that they must continue to reach out, without shame, to more strangers, and hope for more kindness. At the end of this yellow brick road, even success feels like it was cobbled together from a series of favors and failures. "How did you manage it?" kind strangers will ask you, but really, they're just about to ask for a favor themselves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/24/la_la_land/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/24/la_la_land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Caprica&#8221;: Prattlestar melodramatica!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/caprica_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/caprica_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caprica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battlestar Galactica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/21/caprica</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the clumsy "Star Wars" prequel, Syfy's "Battlestar" rewind is a pale shadow of the original (remade) series]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a young "Star Wars" fan in the '70s was awesome, but being an old "Star Wars" fan in the new millennium flatly sucks. Nothing will make you queasier than hearing a young kid refer to "The Empire Strikes Back" simply as "Number Five,"&#160;&#160;as if three stunningly bad prequels are even fit to touch the flowing Jedi hem of the original trilogy. Working backward only made the dialogue and plot points of the prequels feel clunkier and more on-the-nose than they would have otherwise: Characters marched around, remarking on Anakin Skywalker's fierce temper and relentless insecurity, over and over again. "We get it, we get it, <em>he's going to be seduced by the Dark Side!</em>" we growled at the movie screen, begging George Lucas to stop showing us his character notes. How did a luminous being like Lucas churn out such crude matter?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/caprica_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/22/caprica_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Deep End&#8221;: Lawyer Barbies in love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/the_deep_end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/the_deep_end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Deep End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/20/the_deep_end</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like its ambitious first-year attorneys, ABC's frothy legal soap feels a little too shiny and perfect to succeed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you do everything perfectly, shouldn't you be rewarded for it? That's what a gaggle of first-year lawyers ask themselves in ABC's "<strong>The Deep End</strong>" (premieres 8 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 21), a new one-hour drama about recent law grads who work long hours, cling fast to their ideals in the face of corruption, and toss back liquor shots by crystal-blue swimming pools.</p><p>But the same question might apply to "The Deep End" itself: The cast is hot, the dialogue is sharp and snappy, the story lines move briskly, and we're offered a few layers of soapy intrigue immediately, from Dylan (Matt Long), the young idealist who's falling for the pretty redheaded paralegal while trying not to get fired by his unethical shark of a boss (whom everyone refers to as "the prince of darkness"), to Beth (Leah Pipes), the gorgeous blond perfectionist whose disapproving, cutthroat father fuels her temptation to screw over other people just to get ahead.</p><p>Yes, this is "Ally McBeal" meets "Lipstick Jungle" meets "The Practice," a frothy, fast-paced m&#233;lange of every ABC soap that ever featured high-powered yuppies whose designer heels echoed importantly as they click-clacked over shiny corporate floors. With a premise this slick and promising, with faces this pretty, how could "The Deep End" possibly fail?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/the_deep_end/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/the_deep_end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;24&#8243;: Jack Bauer goes soft</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/17/24_season_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/17/24_season_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/16/24_season_8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terror alert red! "24's" ballsy agent now a cooing grandpa, nation's security hangs in the balance!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Losing your edge is underrated. Suddenly you're free to drop out of the media loop. Suddenly you don't have to feel guilty about ignoring things you never cared about to begin with, hipster bands in skinny jeans, tweets about <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/iltw/2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc/index.html">late night shake-ups</a> and all of the other cultural obsessions of a precious handful of busybodies huddled together, drinking overpriced wine in their drafty apartments by the sea.</p><p>Now you can focus on what's really important in life.</p><p>Which is &#8230; Um.</p><p>Huh. I sort of want to go online and do a Google search on "important things in life." Maybe someone has tweeted about this lately&#8230;</p><p>     <strong>It's my Jack in a box!</strong>   </p><p>Thankfully, Jack Bauer has just discovered what's really important in life, and he's here to show us about it. The first time we see Bauer in the eighth season premiere of "<strong>24</strong>" (four-hour, two-night premiere airs 9 p.m. Sunday, Jan. 17, and 8 p.m. Monday, Jan. 18, on Fox) he's smiling and chatting happily with his young granddaughter. Of course we're meant to be gratified by this kinder, gentler image of Bauer, finally having lost his edge, finally at peace with himself, finally open to making real, intimate connections with others, just like a real human being with blood in his veins.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/17/24_season_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/17/24_season_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s to the chicken-hearted and the gutless!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/nbc_ebersol_criticizes_conan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/nbc_ebersol_criticizes_conan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/15/nbc_ebersol_criticizes_conan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC exec calls Conan "failure" for refusing to cater to the lowest common denominator]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, <em>snap!</em> The Leno/Conan switcheroo finally makes sense! Thanks to a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/business/media/15conan.html">priceless report</a> by the New York Times today, we've learned that Conan O'Brien refused to take some <em>really great advice</em> from NBC executive Dick Ebersol about how to broaden his appeal by adjusting the style he used for 16 years on "Late Night." Apparently Ebersol recognized clearly that Conan's quirky style would never play in the central time zone, and he warned him of that fact. But did Conan listen?</p><p>No! The stubborn redheaded stepchild brattily stomped his feet and refused! The comedian and host arrogantly resolved to follow his own instincts about what is and isn't funny and entertaining instead of relying on invaluable comedic advice from the head of NBC Sports.</p><p>Doesn't Conan know that graying executives who spend half their time on the golf course retelling old Henny Youngman punchlines with their executive buddies know much more about comedy than he does? <em>How could he be so foolish and naive?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/nbc_ebersol_criticizes_conan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/nbc_ebersol_criticizes_conan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Archer&#8221;: The spy who shoved me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/fx_archer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/fx_archer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/13/fx_archer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FX's animated James Bond parody injects cheap sex and hand-to-hand combat into the workplace comedy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sterling Archer is a square-jawed international spy who's also a bit of a tool. He hates his bossy mother (who is also his boss). He hates his bossy ex-girlfriend (who is also his co-worker and a fellow spy). He wants his mom to listen to him, and he wants his ex to dump her wimpy boyfriend and take him back. Occasionally, he kills people by accident. ("I'll fetch the rug," offers his butler, Woodhouse [George Coe], in a matter-of-fact tone, as if he's merely fetching the morning paper.)</p><p>In other words, Archer is just like James Bond, only he's self-centered, ineffectual, hopelessly arrogant and prone to firing his weapons in the middle of a crowded office. In turn, FX's animated comedy "<strong>Archer</strong>" (premieres 10 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 14) is just like a James Bond movie, only it's faster-paced, less realistic, more depraved, more mean-spirited, more violent, and it includes lots of potty humor, dirty jokes and cheap shots at Dane Cook.</p><p>But even <em>that</em> doesn't completely explain why I love it so much. Maybe it's just refreshing to see something truly repugnant and foolish that doesn't aspire to have even the remotest trace of a redeeming quality. (Some people claimed that HBO'S "The Life and Times of Tim" had that kind of deeply obnoxious charm, but some people were wrong, because that show wasn't nearly funny enough.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/fx_archer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/fx_archer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin: Crazy like a Fox News pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/sarah_palin_fox_debut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/sarah_palin_fox_debut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/12/sarah_palin_fox_debut</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly introduces the rouged rogue to the media dog pile. Welcome to hell, Sarah]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to state the obvious: Never before in the history of our country have there been more outlets for really stupid people with a lot to say. Blogs, Twitter, radio shows, talk shows, news shows -- a million and one blowhards pile on to the same story du jour, and our confederacy of dunces is dumber and louder than ever.&#160;We're a cacophony of phonies, rushing to judgment, vomiting witty and caustic bons mots while the cameras roll and the clocks tick, gumming up the internets with our thoughtless reaction pieces. (Ahem.)</p><p>So how could a self-congratulatory dim bulb like Sarah Palin resist joining the idiot party? With a face the cameras love, with a head uncluttered by facts, with a mouth that moves fast and makes comfortingly colloquial sounds, how could she fail to recognize her one true calling in life was to become a TV pundit?</p><p>Because, unlike the internets, which are positively filthy with overcaffeinated shut-ins who hardly see the light of day, it's the rare human being who can get all powdered and rouged up and sit under the hot lights and then smile slightly and spit out the same empty catchphrases, over and over again, without once second-guessing him or herself. Television rewards the sort of overconfidence and bluster and lack of self-consciousness that exists primarily among the braindead, the deluded and the sociopathic. The TV camera reads narcissism as genius; those who have original thoughts in their heads are advised to expunge such liabilities post-haste. The neurotic and the detail-oriented need not apply.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/sarah_palin_fox_debut/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/13/sarah_palin_fox_debut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>166</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filling the Leno-shaped hole</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/nbc_leno_time_slot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/nbc_leno_time_slot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/11/nbc_leno_time_slot</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBC scrambles to fill its primetime vacancy with pricey designer names. Can the network possibly succeed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, your idiot boss is torturing you again? Well, now you know you're not alone: Jay Leno's employers may be the most hapless, carelessly cruel managers on the planet &#8211; at least for the moment.</p><p>NBC just pulled the plug on Leno's new show, but they can't tell us where Leno -- or Conan O'Brien, or Jimmy Fallon -- will land. A&#160;fitting insult to add to the repeated injuries inflicted by NBC over the past year, starting with expecting Leno to create a primetime talk show that audiences will want to watch five hours a week, then undercutting&#160;his (really bad) show by alternately overhyping it and referring to it as a cost-cutting measure.&#160;Now, after months of bragging that Leno's ratings could sag and they'd still save money, after months of repeating their intention to stand behind Leno's crappy show, they pull the rug out from under him.</p><p>But Leno can't be the only one who's humiliated &#8211; no, that wouldn't be nearly messy enough. Let's throw in Conan O'Brien, so NBC can alienate a man they've already invested a huge amount of time and money in. Let's make Jimmy Fallon look like a sucker for potentially getting shafted with a 1 a.m. time slot, too. And let's keep the whole plan up in the air long enough that everyone can feel embarrassed and pissed off and insecure, then announce our new line-up with our usual tone-deaf grandiosity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/nbc_leno_time_slot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/nbc_leno_time_slot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Big Love&#8221; and the exquisite perils of family</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/10/big_love_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/10/big_love_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/09/big_love</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three smart, stubborn wives swim against the tide. But is Bill Henrickson strong enough to be their man?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying to translate signs from God can be extremely difficult. Did that telemarketer ask "What's your plan?" because God wants you to have a plan, or does God just want you to refinance your home mortgage? Did the drive-through cashier ask "Will that be all?" because God thinks you're a natural-born leader whose work on this earth isn't nearly completed, or is God just saying you deserve fries and a chocolate shake with that hamburger?</p><p>Are you bathed in a glowing light because it's time for you to lead your flock to the promised land, or because it's time to see an optometrist? Do you feel something violent and powerful moving inside you because God has chosen you as His prophet, or because you really shouldn't have had those fries and that chocolate shake after all?</p><p>     <strong>Beware of God</strong>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/10/big_love_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/10/big_love_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame NBC for the &#8220;Tonight Show&#8221; mess</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current late-night debacle isn't the fault of Conan or Leno. It's the fault of bad parenting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC's first New Year's Resolution: Screw things up but good, then say you didn't. What else can explain the talk, halfway through Jay Leno's disastrous first season filling the nightly 10 p.m. slot, about giving Leno back his 11:30 p.m. slot, and booting Conan O'Brien to midnight (where he'll keep the "Late Night" moniker)?</p><p>Meanwhile NBC issued an announcement that they "remain committed" to keeping Conan, while the network has spent months pretending that Leno's failed experiment at 10, with ratings lower than almost everything else on TV at that hour, has been a real success.</p><p>You know those parents who put their kid on a leash and, while they're bragging about how well it works in a crowd, they yank the leash to make the kid come and instead the kid falls down and cries? You know how those parents try to explain how it really <em>does</em> work while they comfort their kid, then the kid runs away, reaches the end of the leash, falls down again? You know how witnessing the whole thing makes you back away slowly, smiling, but deep inside you feel a little bit depressed?</p><p>That's sort of how the world feels about NBC, Leno and Conan right now. NBC is the idiot parents. Conan is the poor kid. Leno? The leash.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/08/leno_conan_nbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
