<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/ideology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is being liberal a choice?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/is_being_liberal_a_choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/is_being_liberal_a_choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jefferson to modern scientists, ideology has been linked to neuroscience. That way of thinking could be fatal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s become something of a fad of late to apply neuroscience to partisan behaviors. A recent brain scan study distinguished the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/are_republican_brains_different_partner/">Republican from Democratic amygdala</a>: The first is more driven by fear and reward, the latter by more generous-spirited emotional connectivity. In several books, the well-established linguist and cognitive scientist George Lakoff argues the basis for Republicans’ attachment to a rigid concept of paternalistic discipline and enforced obedience to an idealized authority.</p><p>Then there are last year’s two similarly inspired treatments: journalist Chris Mooney’s "The Republican Brain" and moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s "The Righteous Mind." Despite their different training, both authors approach modern tribalism from a similar angle. Mooney wears his partisanship as a proud badge, making much out of the wider-ranging libraries of liberals and the inability of conservatives to accept science as an agent of positive change. Haidt, if liberal-leaning, steers a middle course, advising Democrats to “stop dismissing conservatism as a pathology and start thinking of morality beyond care and fairness.”  In other words, you don’t have to endorse fear and loathing when you show compassion for the conservatives who reserve their compassion for the group of like-minded folks with whom they identify. There is, potentially, he says, a way to find common ground – and not just as there was when liberals joined with conservatives in the climate of fear after 9/11.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/is_being_liberal_a_choice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/is_being_liberal_a_choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand Old Jurassic Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/the_grand_old_jurassic_party_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/the_grand_old_jurassic_party_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With its focus on ideological purity, the Republican species is pushing itself toward extinction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party is a presidential election away from extinction. If it can’t win the 2016 contest, and unless it has bolstered its congressional presence beyond the benefits of gerrymandered redistricting—which is to say not only retaking the Senate but polling more votes than the opposition nationally—the party will die. It will die not for reasons of “branding” or marketing or electoral cosmetics but because the party is at odds with the inevitable American trajectory in the direction of liberty, and with its own nature; paradoxically the party of Abraham Lincoln, which once saved the Union and which gives such passionate lip service to constitutionality, has come to embody the values of the Confederacy in its hostility to constitutional federalism and the civil bonds that the founding document codifies. The Republican Party will vanish not because of what its says but because of what it believes, not because of how it presents itself but because of who it is when it thinks no one is looking.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/the_grand_old_jurassic_party_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/the_grand_old_jurassic_party_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
