<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Immigration Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/immigration_reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A better border is possible</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A more enlightened boundary could make us richer, save lives and even help rescue the Rust Belt. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since Mitt Romney became the presumptive nominee in the Republican primary, something curious has happened to his hardline stance on immigration: It's largely <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/05/romney-fenced-immigration">disappeared</a>. Though he previously supported “attrition through enforcement” – a deeply disturbing approach already in practice in some states that sets out to make working and living conditions so bad for undocumented immigrants that they, in theory, “self-deport” -- Mitt recently claimed he would <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2012/04/18/mitt-romney-vows-study-marco-rubio-plan-allow-young-illegal-immigrants-stay/1ANVG4G7DXKBdlHsdHMXoL/story.html">"study" </a>Marco Rubio's more forgiving immigration bill.</p><p>But as Romney clumsily half-courts the Hispanic vote, conditions at our southern border are growing more dire. The brutal drug-related violence that has long gripped Mexico is on the rise. Two weeks ago, 49 bodies missing their heads, hands and legs were found near Monterey, Mexico.  A message left nearby indicated the Zetas cartel was responsible. One week earlier, 18 dismembered bodies were found in Guadalajara. One week before that, 23 bodies, with indications of torture, were found hanging from a bridge in Nuevo Laredo on the U.S. border. They are casualties of an apocalyptic drug war, a thriving human smuggling trade and, more broadly, a deeply dysfunctional relationship between the U.S. and Mexico.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susana Martinez&#8217;s veep suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Mexico governor is an unlikely running mate for Romney after speaking out on immigration ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/05/13/susana-martinez-what-new-mexico-s-governor-can-teach-the-gop.html">Newsweek</a> touted New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez as a possible running mate for Mitt Romney, the erstwhile beneficiary of the hype all but killed her chances of getting the job by opening her mouth.</p><p>“I absolutely advocate for comprehensive immigration reform,” Martinez  told reporter Andrew Romano. “Republicans want to be tough and say, ‘Illegals, you’re gone.’ But the answer is a lot more complex than that.”</p><p>With those words, Martinez inflicted multiple wounds on whatever slender chance she had to join the national ticket. First, she indicated support for the immigration agenda that President Obama <a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/04/14/obama-promises-to-take-on-immigration-reform-in-first-year-of-second-term/">promises to pursue</a> if he defeats Romney in November. Second, the reforms the 43-year-old first-term Republican favors are opposed by every Republican member of the Senate (even those like John McCain, who used to support it) and a solid majority in the House. (In case there was any doubt, the same day Martinez's interview appeared, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76260.html" target="_blank">Politico</a> reported that the Romney campaign was seeking a "boring white guy" as a running mate.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/susana_martinezs_veep_suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio&#8217;s race for Romney&#8217;s ear on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/rubios_race_for_romney_ear_on_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/rubios_race_for_romney_ear_on_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12788401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the Florida senator steer the presumptive GOP nominee away from from immigration hard-liner Kris Kobach?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The premature speculation about Marco Rubio as a possible vice-presidential candidate (efficiently spiked by political scientist <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/ann-coulter-says-marco-rubio-as-vp-pick-would-be-a-mistake/">Ann Coulter</a>) obscures the Florida senator's entrance into a more interesting and significant 2012 contest: the campaign for Mitt Romney's ear on immigration.</p><p>Rubio joined this contest last week by <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/n2k-presidential-race-rubio-and-romney-a-marriage-of-convenience-20120329?mrefid=site_search">endorsing</a> Romney and then sitting down with <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/294846/rubio-race-jim-geraghty">National Review Online,</a> <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/rubio-romney-vp-nominee/2012/03/29/id/434253?s=al&amp;promo_code=E8CD-1">NewsMax</a>, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74663.html">Politico</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za5-FxA33wI">Geraldo Rivera,</a> and <a href="http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2012/04/01/video-full-marco-rubio-interview-uncut/">Fox News</a>, to propose a new direction in U.S. immigration policy: a GOP-style DREAM Act to reward high-achieving high school students who are illegal immigrants. While the Democratic-sponsored DREAM Act promises U.S. citizenship to good students, Rubio says he and other Republican are exploring some other tangible reward short of citizenship. He told NRO:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/rubios_race_for_romney_ear_on_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/rubios_race_for_romney_ear_on_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Undocumented and unafraid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/immigration_activists_announce_theyre_undocumented_and_unafraid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/immigration_activists_announce_theyre_undocumented_and_unafraid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12729451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's the rallying cry of a new group of immigration activists who are turning toward more confrontational tactics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 14, Tania Chairez and Jessica Hyejin Lee walked into the Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices in downtown Philadelphia and handed over letters demanding the release of Miguel Orellana, an undocumented immigrant who has been detained for eight months at a Pennsylvania detention center. Both Chairez, a 19-year-old sophomore at the University of Pennsylvania, and Lee, a 20-year-old junior at Bryn Mawr College, were undocumented immigrants themselves, having been brought to the U.S. by their parents at ages 5 and 12, respectively. After making their demand, they exited the building, sat down in the middle of the street, and began shouting “Undocumented! Unafraid!” They were arrested after refusing to move, putting themselves at risk of deportation in the process. <strong><br />
</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/immigration_activists_announce_theyre_undocumented_and_unafraid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/immigration_activists_announce_theyre_undocumented_and_unafraid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Both sides win in Brewer-Obama tiff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/both_sides_win_in_brewer_obama_tiff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/both_sides_win_in_brewer_obama_tiff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12244271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arizona governor wins right-wing cred with one wag of her finger, the president wins with people who hate her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer yesterday engineered <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57366431/jan-brewer-gets-an-earful-from-obama-in-ariz/">the creation of a photograph of herself wagging her finger at the president</a>, then went on a brief media tour calling the president "thin-skinned" and promoting her book.</p><p>The president took a trip to Arizona ostensibly to do something involving jobs and "innovation," and immediately upon exiting Air Force Once, President Obama and Gov. Brewer began arguing. The argument took place outside the earshot of reporters, but they saw Brewer wag her finger, Obama and Brewer talk over each other, and Obama walk away from Brewer while she was still speaking (which, seriously: enraging move, right?).</p><p>Brewer then went over to the reporters and said the president was mad about her book, "Scorpions for Breakfast," available now at booksellers everywhere. Drudge soon posted the pool report and the finger-wagging picture. Brewer went on Fox and a local radio show. She <a href="http://www.facebook.com/GovJanBrewer?sk=wall">posted the picture on her Facebook wall.</a> It was brilliant, really.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/both_sides_win_in_brewer_obama_tiff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/both_sides_win_in_brewer_obama_tiff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>193</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney and adviser at odds on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/romney_and_adviser_at_odds_on_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/romney_and_adviser_at_odds_on_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11869701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Black lobbied for the DREAM Act, which the candidate has promised to veto]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An informal adviser to the Mitt Romney campaign recently lobbied Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform and the DREAM Act, stances that are at odds with Romney’s increasingly hard-line position on the immigration in general and opposition to the DREAM Act in particular.</p><p>Longtime Republican operative Charlie Black, who was a top aide to the John McCain campaign in 2008, has joined Romney’s “circle of informal advisers,” the New York Times <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/veteran-lobbyist-to-advise-romney-campaign/">reported</a> this week. After McCain lost, Black rejoined as chairman the high-powered bipartisan lobbying firm he founded in the 1980s, which is now <a href="http://www.prime-policy.com/">called</a> Prime Policy Group.</p><p>Disclosure records show that in early 2011, Black, personally lobbied for Wal-Mart on the issue of the DREAM Act, which would extend permanent resident status to illegal immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children and meet various achievement requirements. Wal-Mart has been a prominent voice in favor of comprehensive immigration reform. Prime Policy Group was paid $60,000 by Wal-Mart in the first quarter of 2011 for lobbing on immigration and other issues.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/romney_and_adviser_at_odds_on_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/romney_and_adviser_at_odds_on_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Arizona wrote the GOP&#8217;s immigration platform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/how_arizona_wrote_the_gops_immigration_platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/how_arizona_wrote_the_gops_immigration_platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the border gets more secure,  Gov. Jan Brewer gets more agitated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer may have recently <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/02/jan-brewer-arizona-2012-primary_n_946582.html">decided </a>against moving the state’s Republican primary to January, but that didn’t stop her own campaign to bring Arizona back to the center of the hotly charged national debate on immigration and border security.</p><p>Kicking off her book tour with a sneak preview in Alabama last Friday, in homage to that state’s controversial crackdown on immigrant schoolchildren and workers, Brewer set out the two main themes of her impassioned new book, "Scorpions for Breakfast: My Fight Against Special Interests, Liberal Media, and Cynical Politics to Secure America's Borders." She said, "We are under siege. And we have been totally disrespected by the federal government."</p><p>Brewer makes it clear from the first line that it is not really "we," as in the collective Arizona populace, but <em>she </em>who has been unfairly treated by the "liberal" media and President Obama, in particular, in the aftermath of Arizona's defiant legislative act. She so identities herself with the state that she writes at one point, "Kind of like me.  Kind of like Arizona." The substantial portion of the state that is <em>not</em> like Brewer is what torments her.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/how_arizona_wrote_the_gops_immigration_platform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/how_arizona_wrote_the_gops_immigration_platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record number of deportations still not enough for anti-immigration zealots</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/record_number_of_deportations_still_not_enough_for_anti_immigration_zealots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/record_number_of_deportations_still_not_enough_for_anti_immigration_zealots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10127402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration kicked out 400,000 people this year, satisfying no one and winning no support for reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration deported a record number of immigrants in fiscal year 2011. Nearly 400,000 people kicked out of America. That must thrill the anti-immigration crowd, right? Eh, not so much. Mark Krikorian, one of the National Review's resident anti-immigration zealots, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/280585/hollow-deportation-boast-mark-krikorian">says the record number of deportations doesn't count</a>, because there will never, ever be enough deportations for this crowd.</p><p>"But when you look at history, the 'largest number' is only about 1,700 more than two years ago," Krikorian says. So most deportations ever, but <em>not by a large enough margin.</em></p><p>If Obama <em>really</em> cared, see, he'd deport a zillion people:</p><blockquote><p>Nor is the stagnation in the deportation numbers due to a temporary diversion of resources, as after 9/11: The Obama administration, as a matter of policy, refuses to even <em>ask</em> Congress for the resources needed to deport any more than 400,000 people. Now, 400,000 deportations (of illegal aliens, of course, but also of <em>legal</em> aliens who made themselves deportable because of crimes) is a lot, but it can easily be doubled; I remember one of the top people at INS in the Clinton years telling me that the 114,000 removed in 1997 was a really, really big number and sufficient proof of their seriousness about immigration enforcement.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/record_number_of_deportations_still_not_enough_for_anti_immigration_zealots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/record_number_of_deportations_still_not_enough_for_anti_immigration_zealots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama Republican: I will do anything &#8220;short of shooting&#8221; undocumented immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mo_brooks_anti_immigrant_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mo_brooks_anti_immigrant_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/13/mo_brooks_anti_immigrant_comments</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Mo Brooks says he will do anything "short of shooting" undocumented immigrants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politicalwire.com/">Taegan Goddard</a> picked up on a disturbing comment from Republican Rep. Mo Brooks to a local television station in Alabama:</p><blockquote>
<p>"As your congressman on the House floor, I will do anything short of shooting them. Anything that is lawful, it needs to be done because illegal aliens need to quit taking jobs from American citizens."</p>
</blockquote><p>During the same brief interview, Brooks also said that so many illegal aliens were in an Alabama jail because they had "victimized Americans."</p><p>Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley, a Republican, last month signed controversial legislation that makes the state's crackdown on undocumented immigrants one of the toughest in the country. As our own <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/11/alabama_immigration_law">Justin Elliott wrote,</a> "Like the Arizona law, Alabama's measure requires local police to check the immigration status of people who they believe may be in the country illegally. But it goes much further, establishing new requirements for checking the immigration status of students and potential tenants."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mo_brooks_anti_immigrant_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mo_brooks_anti_immigrant_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying again with the DREAM Act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/dream_act_senate_hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/dream_act_senate_hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/28/dream_act_senate_hearing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats launch their latest push, but will anything be different this time?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its various permutations since 2001, the DREAM Act, which&#160;would grant a path to citizenship for children brought to the United States illegally, has certainly done the rounds on Capitol Hill. But Tuesday saw its first ever Senate hearing. According to <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/06/28/6965314-impossible-dream-dems-push-dream-act-again">MSNBC's Domenico Montanaro</a>, "more than 200 people [were] in the room, including many students, who say they are undocumented and pushing for the passage of the bill."</p><p>Last December the bill failed in the Senate 55-41 (in what was its fifth roll out) and since the Republicans are now in the majority, the bill has no greater prospects this time round. However, its defenders are hoping an argument from economics might do the trick. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in Tuesday testimony, "this is an investment not an expense."</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57909.html#ixzz1Qaktp3ga">According to Politico</a>, "Duncan said the law would rescue the federal deficit by $1.4 billion in the next decade by making it possible for more illegal immigrants to stay in the country and pay taxes."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/dream_act_senate_hearing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/dream_act_senate_hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right&#8217;s real problem with immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/punish_the_immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/punish_the_immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/23/punish_the_immigrants</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do conservatives just want someone to punish?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued a memo saying that field agents and office directors should focus on only deporting <em>dangerous</em> illegal immigrants, instead of just any illegal immigrants they find. The conservative press, obviously, <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/20/white-house-loosens-border-rules-for-2012/">dubbed this a "stealth DREAM Act"</a> and an act of "loosening the border rules for 2012." (The DREAM Act was the bill that would've allowed some minuscule number of basically perfect Americans unlucky enough to have been born elsewhere the opportunity to eventually become citizens. It failed. Repeatedly.)</p><p>That's <a href="http://prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=06&amp;year=2011&amp;base_name=new_immigration_nontroversy_st">obviously, patently absurd:</a> The White House is still deporting more people than any previous administration and this memo only calls for some discretion in deciding <em>who</em><em>m</em> to deport, because the nation literally cannot deport them all. ("<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/18/us/18immig.html?_r=1&amp;hp">Also on Friday,</a> Mr. Obama extended the deployment of some 1,200 National Guard troops who are backing up immigration agents along the Southwest border." Why won't the president protect us from the Mexicans?)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/punish_the_immigrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/23/punish_the_immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pulitzer winner: I&#8217;m here illegally</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/pulitzer_vargas_illegal_immigrant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/pulitzer_vargas_illegal_immigrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/22/pulitzer_vargas_illegal_immigrant</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The usual anti-immigration suspects begin going after Jose Antonio Vargas after his big admission]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>[UPDATED BELOW]</strong>
  </p><p>Former Washington Post journalist Jose Antonio Vargas -- who won a Pulitzer Prize with the paper for his reporting on the Virginia Tech tragedy in 2007 -- made a shocking admission this morning: He's an illegal immigrant.</p><p>Vargas made the confession by way of a remarkable personal essay in the New York Times Magazine, titled "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/magazine/my-life-as-an-undocumented-immigrant.html?pagewanted=1">My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant</a>." His story began at the age of 12, when he emigrated from the Philippines to live with his grandparents in California. At the time, Vargas says, he didn't know anything was amiss. He says he discovered his illegal status at 16, when he went to the DMV to obtain a learner's permit -- only to be informed by a staffer there that his green card was forged.</p><p>Still, he continued to assimilate, became a leader in his high school, and earned a scholarship to San Francisco State University. Later came newspaper internships, culminating with a post-grad offer from the Washington Post.&#160;Along the way, he cautiously built a network of sympathetic figures who knew his secret and helped him to maintain the facade of citizenship. He's gone on to build a career for himself as a star journalist, though he says he always felt uncomfortable with the deception.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/pulitzer_vargas_illegal_immigrant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/pulitzer_vargas_illegal_immigrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alabama&#8217;s harsh new immigration law explained</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/11/alabama_immigration_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/11/alabama_immigration_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/11/alabama_immigration_law</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alabama's Republican governor signs the harshest immigration law in the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley signed what both critics and backers agree is the toughest immigration law in the country.</p><p>Despite the relative lack of national media attention, the Alabama law includes more harsh measures than even Arizona's notorious SB 1070, which immediately faced legal challenges after <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html">passing</a> last year. Like the Arizona law, Alabama's measure requires local police to check the immigration status of people who they believe may be in the country illegally.</p><p>But it goes much further, establishing new requirements for checking the immigration status of students and potential tenants. It is scheduled to go into effect in September -- but not before a promised legal challenge by civil rights groups.</p><p>Bentley (whom we last encountered <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/01/19/bentley_apologizes_private_citizen">apologizing</a> for comments about Jesus) signed the legislation after it <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-alabama-immigration-20110605,0,4401300.story">passed</a> both houses of the state's Republican-controlled Legislature by a wide margin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/11/alabama_immigration_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/11/alabama_immigration_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>372</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ala illegal immigration law tougher than Arizona&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/10/us_alabama_immigration_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/10/us_alabama_immigration_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/10/us_alabama_immigration_law</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alabama schools will soon have to check if students are in the country legally]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alabama schools will soon have to check if students are in the country legally and people stopped for any reason could be arrested on suspicion of immigration violations under a sweeping law being called the nation's most restrictive against illegal immigration.</p><p>Advocacy groups promised to challenge the sweeping measure signed by Gov. Robert Bentley on Thursday, which they call even more severe than the one in Arizona that is being challenged in court.</p><p>In addition, it requires all businesses to check the legal status of workers using a federal system called E-Verify and makes it a crime to knowingly give an illegal immigrant a ride.</p><p>"It is clearly unconstitutional. It's mean-spirited, racist, and we think a court will enjoin it," said Mary Bauer, legal director for the Southern Poverty Law Center.</p><p>It takes effect Sept. 1.</p><p>Bentley expressed confidence it would withstand any legal challenges.</p><p>"We have a real problem with illegal immigration in this country," he said. "I campaigned for the toughest immigration laws, and I'm proud of the Legislature for working tirelessly to create the strongest immigration bill in the country."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/10/us_alabama_immigration_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/10/us_alabama_immigration_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comprehensive immigration reform is dead &#8212; and the left is to blame</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/lind_immigration_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/lind_immigration_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/17/lind_immigration_left</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats have done a fine job convincing Americans that they aren't remotely serious about border control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comprehensive immigration reform is dead. For the foreseeable future, there is no chance that Congress will pass a grand bargain on immigration reform like the one that fell apart in 2007 including a mass amnesty or path to citizenship for most illegal immigrants already in the U.S. Nor is there any chance that the Dream Act, which would provide citizenship for many illegal immigrants as long as they attended college or served in the U.S. military, will be enacted into law. The Democrats could not pass the unpopular Dream Act even when they controlled both houses of Congress last December. Their cynical purpose in reintroducing it now is to play wedge issue politics with Latino voters in the run-up to the 2012 elections.</p><p>As in an old Perry Mason TV serial, or an Agatha Christie novel, the victim was murdered by multiple killers. The greatest wound may have been inflicted by the Great Recession. With mass unemployment expected to last for years to come, it is hard to imagine public support for an amnesty for the 12 million or so illegal immigrants in the U.S., particularly if it were not accompanied by adequate enforcement and encouraged a new wave of law-breaking by millions of foreign nationals in anticipation of future amnesties.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/lind_immigration_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/17/lind_immigration_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama mocks Republican position on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Maybe they'll say we need a moat. Or alligators in the moat," the president said, speaking in El Paso]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama says his administration has answered the concerns of Republican lawmakers who want the U.S.-Mexico border better secured before they are willing to take on comprehensive immigration reform.</p><p>Standing at the border Tuesday, Obama mocked Republicans for never being satisfied and always changing the conditions about what's needed to secure the border. Said the president: "Maybe they'll say we need a moat. Or alligators in the moat."</p><p>Obama says that stepped-up enforcement is getting results.</p><p>Obama used his speech in El Paso, Texas, to push Congress to work with him on a plan to give millions of illegal residents a path to citizenship.</p><p>He also said a burden rests with illegal immigrants to do right by the law. He said they make a "mockery" of all those who try to immigrate legally.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>President Barack Obama, visiting the U.S.-Mexico border for the first time as president, is trying to build pressure on Republicans to take on comprehensive immigration legislation -- while showing vital Hispanic voters that he is not the one standing in the way.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Obama&#8217;s trip to the border actually matter?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/obama_immigration_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/obama_immigration_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/10/obama_immigration_politics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president is calling for immigration reform -- but there's reason to treat it as an empty gesture]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Barack Obama speaks at the U.S.-Mexico border Tuesday, calling for immigration reform, he will have a tough time winning over immigration advocates -- and rightly so: There have been a record-breaking 400,000 deportations in each of the past two years, more than under the Bush administration; border security has ramped up; and even the modest Dream Act failed to pass the Senate last year.</p><p>Obama's speech in El Paso will specifically argue for the economic benefits of immigration and the tightening of border controls, according to officials who have previewed the speech. He will push to extend the stay of 1,200 National Guard stationed at the border, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/10/us-obama-immigration-idUSTRE74905S20110510">Reuters reports</a>, but will also argue for a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.</p><p>With a Republican controlled House, no one is laboring under the impression that a comprehensive immigration reform bill could pass now. And as <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54629.html#ixzz1LyHbKHLm">Politico notes</a>, immigration advocates have called for the president to use his executive powers to "halt deportations of young illegal immigrants who would qualify for the Dream Act" -- a move Obama is resisting. So all it is even possible for the president to offer Tuesday is a stated (but as yet unproven) commitment to immigration reform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/obama_immigration_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/obama_immigration_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama pushing for immigration overhaul in El Paso</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President to make case for comprehensive reform during border speech Tuesday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama is making his first trip as president to the U.S.-Mexico border, using the setting to sharpen his call for a remake of the nation's immigration laws and try to cast the GOP as the obstacle standing in its way.</p><p>The president's speech in El Paso, Texas, on Tuesday, and his visit to a border crossing there, are the latest high-profile immigration events by Obama, who has also hosted meetings at the White House recently with Latino lawmakers, movie stars and others.</p><p>It all comes despite an unfavorable climate on Capitol Hill, where Republicans who control the House have shown no interest in legislation that offers a pathway to citizenship for the nation's 11 million illegal immigrants.</p><p>That's led to criticism that Obama's efforts are little more than politics in pursuit of the ever-growing Hispanic electorate ahead of the 2012 election. White House officials dispute that. They acknowledge the difficulties in getting a bill but say it's likelier to happen if the president creates public support for immigration legislation, leading to pressure on Republican lawmakers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/10/us_obama_immigration_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Arizona music boycott has made a difference</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/sound_strike_responds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/sound_strike_responds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/18/sound_strike_responds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sound Strike responds to charges that its protest against anti-immigration bill only hurts local venues and fans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Sound Strike Arizona boycott by musicians and artists reaches almost a year in effect, the fight for basic human rights in Arizona for immigrants continues. Even with the recent 9th District Court upholding a temporary injunction against some provisions of Arizona&#8217;s controversial SB1070, hate and bigotry in Arizona remains high. In fact, the infamous Sheriff Arpaio has repeatedly said he does not need SB1070 because he has the "inherent authority" to engage in tactics outlined in SB1070. In fact, he is under federal investigation for many of those tactics.</p><p>The battle for immigrant justice continues. Over two dozen immigrant hate bills have been introduced this year. Several have passed, including a birther bill targeting President Obama. Now business is getting involved. Recently, a letter from Arizona CEOs stopped five draconian immigrant hate bills, including the controversial birthright citizenship repeal. The letter from the CEOs, as well as countless Arizona political observers, business, and Sunday morning political shows, have consistently reported on the effectiveness of the Arizona boycott.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/sound_strike_responds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/sound_strike_responds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a boycott meant to save Arizona is hurting it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/white_knighting_arizona_sound_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/white_knighting_arizona_sound_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White Knighting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/18/white_knighting_arizona_sound_strike</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sound Strike is an attack on the anti-immigration bill, so why are local venues and music fans the ones suffering?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On paper, the mission of <a href="http://thesoundstrike.info/about-the-sound-strike/">Sound Strike</a> seems like an admirable attempt by musicians to boycott Arizona's passage of the SB 1070 bill. After all, the tourism industry of the state has already <a href="http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2011/03/arizonas_immigration_laws_cost.html">seen million-dollar losses</a> as conventions move elsewhere in opposition to the anti-immigration law. Sound Strike's artists appear to be operating under the same line of defense: By refusing to play in-state venues, they are dedicated to "raising awareness and opposition to the predatory and punitive treatment of immigrants in Arizona."</p><p>But according to a vocal group of anti-legislation sympathizers in Arizona's music industry, Sound Strike has done nothing but hurt the community it is theoretically trying to help. By canceling shows, these bands have left non-profit venues in a lurch. By not showing up, these state citizens argue, the musicians involved in Sound Strike missed an opportunity to rally young voters against the bill in the first place.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/white_knighting_arizona_sound_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/white_knighting_arizona_sound_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

