Imprint

Envisioning a new Antarctica

A new book explores the art, science and politics behind the stateless continent

  • more
    • All Share Services

Envisioning a new Antarctica

I must admit, I wasn’t sure whether Antarctica was the North or South Pole. So much for elementary school geography.

Yet thanks to the multidisciplinary artist Paul D. Miller, aka DJ Spooky, now I will forever know. He has just published “The Book of Ice” (Mark Batty Publishers), part art, science, environmental manifesto and socio-political analysis of the one place in the world that is not the property of any nation or state — Antarctica.

This smartly designed volume (which launches here on July 13) follows in the Utopian/dystopian literary and art tradition of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Miller charts territory that becomes a microcosm of our world and starts from zero. He envisions a future revolution sparked by “The Manifesto of the People’s Republic of Antarctica.” To support this revolution, Miller speculates on Antarctica’s future history with its own visual, verbal and sound language  promoted through essays, music, photographs, interviews, architectural plans, and propaganda.

In addition to Russian Constructivist-inspired posters in all the world’s tongues (shown here), Miller employs images from his journey to the bottom of the world, original artwork, and re-appropriated archival materials. Brian Greene, author of “The Elegant Universe,” writes in his foreword, “The Book of Ice” is:

“infused with Paul D. Miller’s iconic imagination…. [It] casts a new and different light on this frozen terrain that has long been Earth’s most mysterious region. The book amplifies Antarctica’s frozen isolation, punctured now with ever greater frequency, and reveals its own set of hidden connections, remixing ice anew.”


Manifesto for a People's


Manifesto


Aqua Antarctica


Manifesto Penguins

People's Republic DJ Spooky


H2O

ESSE QUAM VIDERI Antarctica Map


Antarctica Map

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2011.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Greetings from the brink of nuclear annihilation

A stunning new book brings together atomic Cold War propaganda from across the globe

  • more
    • All Share Services

Greetings from the brink of nuclear annihilation

Initially, the dawn of the Atomic Age came in the form of two mushrooms clouds over Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, ending the Second World War. But in the years immediately following the war, while the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was raising red flags about the dangers of nuclear weapons and warning of the impending arms race, hundreds of postcards were being produced to ramp up support for — or soften the message about — atomic energy, and its unfortunate byproduct: weapons of mass destruction.

In a sense, the atom became a tourist attraction or a bragging right despite the paradoxical absurdity of the notion itself. A stunning new book, “Atomic Postcards” (Intellect/University of Chicago Press), brings together dozens of atomic propaganda from countries as diverse as Belgium, Britain, Canada, China, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, the Philippines, Russia (then the Soviet Union), Switzerland and the United States.

Edited by John O’Brian, a professor of art history at the University of British Columbia, and visual artist Jeremy Borsos, both Canadians, “Atomic Postcards” documents a treasure trove of these Cold War relics, some which need to be seen to be believed.


Brink


Atomic Bomb

At what point did the project become a book idea? Or did it begin as a book project?

John O’Brian: I first addressed atomic issues in 2003, while giving a Levintritt lecture at Harvard. Part of the lecture reflected on the attitudes of the Abstract Expressionists to the atomic era in which they worked. The lecture caused a minor stir, which encouraged me to inquire further into matters of atomic representation. I asked Jeremy to collaborate with me in building an atomic archive. He purchased several postcards online before we realized that we had stumbled on an unexplored genre. He kept looking for cards and by 2008 we had built a substantial collection. The book followed from that.

Jeremy Borsos: The project began with John frequenting my home with visits that coalesced around things artistic and historic and their various readings. He was ensconced in things atomic before the postcards, and was finding ways of translating the postwar moment visually into an elevated conversation that superseded the predictable.

So the things I started looking at for him were items like the first color photographs taken by the U.S. Navy of their atomic tests, but also photographs of the first Bikini show — meaning the bathing suit as a namesake of what officially was referred to as “Operation Crossroads” — a test in Bikini Atoll in the South Pacific. Eventually I built up a diverse collection of about 200 items.

We were our own worst enemies, spurring each other into the collecting of and translations into visual commentary of the period between 1945 and 1980. There seemed to be a large variety of postal history encompassing the subject, and a separate archive of postcards was suggested by John, who fortunately for me took stewardship of the many boxes of stuff collected.


Bikini Crossroads

Were you two friends previously? Or were you bonded by the artwork of the atomic age?

John O’Brian: Yes. In 2003, I wrote an essay for the exhibition catalog of Jeremy’s compelling show, “Then Again,” which consisted of a series of large photomontages. The works combined photographs of real estate sites with those of envelopes addressed to the same sites at an earlier date.

Jeremy Borsos: We were friends previously and bonded not only over things atomic, but generally within the context of contemporary art language.When John and his wife, Helen, moved near me, I was thrilled to meet them. In fact, I think I met Helen when she saw me reconstructing a huge 19th century architectural fragment in a field to photograph as a project. John and I met at a gathering, where I showed him a small project, which he immediately supported.


Launch


Soviet Nuclear Defenses

Both of you are Canadians. Canada does not possess any weapons of mass destruction. In fact, it repudiates their use. Personally, are you two opposed to nuclear weapons?

John O’Brian: At the end of World War II, Canada was an atomic power. It also wished to build its own nuclear arsenal following the war; it possessed the necessary scientific expertise and material resources to do so. Prime Minister Mackenzie King opted against the pursuit of a nuclear weapons program, choosing instead to steer a wobbly course between building and banishing the bomb. Canada never joined the nuclear armaments club — membership is restricted to those countries producing nuclear weapons — but it did become a major supplier of uranium, nickel and other natural resources crucial to the weapons programs of the United States and Britain. In addition, through long-term agreements, it turned over its coastlines and landmass to the United States for use as proving grounds for nuclear missile and submarine testing; partnered in the construction of three early warning radar systems, including the DEW Line in the arctic, to sound the alarm against Soviet bomber attack; accepted American nuclear-tipped Bomarc missiles on Canadian soil; and exported Canadian nuclear expertise around the globe in the form of the CANDU reactor.

I am personally opposed to nuclear weapons, even if my country has been unsure about the matter.

Jeremy Borsos: “Opposed” to nuclear weaponry doesn’t quite contain the degree of embarrassment I feel. Even as a teenager I joined in anti-nuclear marches, and attending a Quaker boarding school secured my loathing of the nadir of human invention that is weaponry of the nuclear variety. I would like to think that Canada’s nuclear opposition is and has been complete, but rather, it has been complicit. Ask John about Yellow Cake…


Bomare

How did you two come to collect these postcards? Where did you find the majority of them?

John O’Brian: I have been a collector of visual histories my entire life, eventually directing their use to creative ends. Previously I collected postcards with multiple criteria in mind. John’s interest in the subject of Cold War imagery from a contemporary art perspective ignited a mutual foray into exploring the graphic delivery of the subject as well as its intellectual legacy.

The content of the cards is outrageous yet we hold them in our hands in an intimate way. The format of a book supported the proximities of the original reading of a postcard while allowing us to frame them with adjoining text.

Then there is eBay. The online auction site has changed the world of collecting and helped form strong collections much more quickly than in the past. That is where I found most of the cards. Several years ago, atomic-related material were plentiful.

Cards were often acquired with the greatest of ease, as other collectors’ criteria seemed vague. My only true nemesis was a single collector, a nuclear physicist, who frequently outbid me but ended up lending us what we had lost to him. The collection took a little over four years to assemble, along with some scouring of European and Japanese flea markets, and a few more cards borrowed from more diverse collections of material.

Some of the postcards are interesting from a graphic design point of view. The Greetings From … selections, in particular, send chills down my spine. Do you have favorites among the collection in the book? And why?

Jeremy Borsos: What the postcards represent is both horrendous and strangely benign at the same time. One of my favorites is the black-and-white halftone image of the Cedar Hill Elementary School in Oakridge, Tenn. (the “Atomic City”). Graphically, it has the visual comfort of an image from a small-town newspaper. It epitomizes the social acceptance of Mutual Assured Destruction.

Then there is the Hoyt B. Wooton Bomb Shelter, also in Tennessee, fitted out with Eames chairs and a ping-pong table, suggesting that life hiding from nuclear attack need be no different than life in a suburban rec room. An “insert” in the upper-right corner of the card draws viewers’ attention to the facility’s modernist architecture. The handwritten message on the back of the card is scrawled in a child’s hand. It is for “Aunt Clara.” Too perfect.

Dark Clouds Atomic Bomb Clouds Buidling design Greetings from Los Alamos postcard Pollution

*All images are from “Atomic Postcards” and courtesy of the authors.

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2011.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

How to hold a postmortem meeting

The project's finished! It's time to evaluate the work you've done and help your team learn from the experience

  • more
    • All Share Services

How to hold a postmortem meeting

The website went live last week, and the entire staff is throwing a party to celebrate! The developers are huddled in the corner with some microbrews, plotting how they’ll splice into the agency intranet to add a virtual dartboard. Designers are mingling with the copywriters and account people, clinking wine glasses and bonding over the ads they saw during “The Office.”

Yes, the job went way over budget — and the last thing your team wants to think about is who needs to take responsibility for it. Not the best time to mention that tomorrow, you’re scheduling a postmortem meeting (aka lessons learned, post future, etc.) to talk about how the project really went.

Was the estimate wrong to begin with? Did the designer spend too long tweaking those page comps? How come the developer pulled so many late nights wrangling with the content management system, when he said he knew .NET?

Discovering how a creative agency fails to make profit on a project usually boils down to a series of in-project decisions that, while intended to contribute to project success, lead to cost overruns and errors. Isolating and clarifying those agency decisions, role by role, can be punishing if conducted incorrectly. But if carried out in the right manner and in a safe group setting, a postmortem meeting can galvanize a team and bring them closer together. By being aware of everyone’s perspectives, your team members can see repeated problems in patterns of behavior and discover ways to change them. Plus, the ongoing learning that comes from open communication and active collaboration is what makes businesses more sustainable — especially on large, multi-phase projects that continue over months, if not years.

The flow of a well-structured postmortem meeting

Here’s a draft agenda for an hour-long postmortem meeting. Make sure you are meeting in a space that has a large whiteboard, so you can capture what everyone says as the meeting unfolds. And when scheduling the meeting, think about what you can attach to the meeting request that help ground people in what you’ll accomplish during the meeting.

1. Set the tone for the meeting (3-5 minutes). The postmortem process requires the same deliberate care as the facilitation approach you would take for any form of client collaboration. Postmortems should always be constructive, and be conducted in a manner that is professional and respectful. It often helps to have the meeting leader be someone who wasn’t on the project. They will be responsible for taking notes on the whiteboard.

Kick the meeting off by letting everyone know the goal for the meeting: understanding what went well and what could be improved about your recently completed project that you can apply to future projects. There must be a clear balance between the two buckets, or the room may only linger on complaints about everything that went wrong.

Everyone in the room should be aware that nothing said by any team member will go down on their permanent record. You are all taking part in the postmortem to learn from your colleagues. Nothing will be taken personally against anyone who offers deep feedback. If mistakes were made along the way, more respect will be given to those who own up to causing them. No finger-pointing!

Let everyone know that if an issue is large enough to warrant at least five minutes of group discussion, promise to follow up with the team members individually to talk further and outline next steps to address similar situations in the future.

2. Describe the business problem and the proposed agency approach (5-10 minutes). Clearly describe what the client wanted to achieve from the project. Move at a very high level through the proposal the client signed, if anyone in the room wasn’t aware of the agreed-upon terms. Ask your team to consider how the proposal did (or didn’t) guide the team towards the final delivered project. Common questions during this phase of the post-mortem may include:

  • Were there challenges that could have been foreseen from previous agency projects that weren’t factored into the proposal?
  • Were there any issues with how the proposal was structured or written?
  • Were there deviations that occurred during the project that could be traced back to poorly defined scope?
  • Were promises made in early meetings, but not in writing, that influenced client expectations?

3. Walk through how the agency executed the project (30 minutes). This portion of the post-mortem is a deep dive into what happened, and why, over the life of a project. Discuss the major milestones of the project process and key points where there may have been rework beyond your usual creative process. The staff can jump around in time as appropriate; this doesn’t have to be linear.

If necessary, have on hand the artifacts that supported project completion: creative brief, technical and functional specifications, client communications, vendor input, and the paper/digital trail of design work occurring over the project. You shouldn’t be using the time to re-proof or critique the minutiae of each deliverable. They exist in the room to provoke your team’s memory banks.

Here’s a sampling of common issues that crop up during this type of discussion:

  • Did you fulfill what you’d promised in the proposal?
  • Did the deliverables line up with what the agency actually created for the client? If not, why?
  • Was the creative brief an accurate reflection of what is in the proposal and the strategic direction from your agency?
  • Were there client requests that changed the project strategy from the approved brief while the project was in process? If not, did the agency absorb into the project cost getting the client to the right strategy? Were you paid for that extra time investment? What were the repercussions?
  • Were there technical challenges that occurred during the life of the projects that were unexpected? Should they have been expected and factored into the schedule?
  • Did the team have a complete knowledge of what the project required?
  • Were you penalized for the team verging outside their area of core expertise? Did you factor that time into the project budget to support the time they needed to gain the knowledge necessary to succeed? (Another way of phrasing this is: Did you bid the project for your best case scenario, while knowing full well that best case scenarios rarely occur if they are contingent on technologies or unique deliverables that are new to your team?)
  • Did the team spent time scrambling to address client concerns without proper triage?
  • Was the chain of command followed through each phase of the project? (Is there one?)
  • Did your vendors fall in line with your agency process/timeline? Did they contribute to your success or provide further hurdles to surmount?
  • Did lack of communication or personality friction dictate staff behavior? (This is something that may not be discussed in the post-mortem, but will need to be acknowledged to said parties.)

4. Solve for perceived problems (10 minutes). At the end of the previous phase, you should have a whiteboard list of your team’s thoughts and impressions regarding what went well and what could have been improved on their projects. Now is your chance to be problem solvers and suggest changes to your agency process! Circle pain points and ask your team to brainstorm ways to keep them from happening in the future. When the brainstorming is over, copy down everyone’s ideas and send them to the team after the meeting. Seek out owners and action items for making sure the changes stick.

5. Show the team, in a pleasing visual format, where the time and money went (5 minutes). In any agency, your staff should have no illusions: time equals money. There must be a balance between quality of work delivered and profit for your company. So, if you can, show your staff what your financial targets were and how the agency performed against them. With this visualization in hand, you can ask your team (and yourself): Based on what we know now, how would we approach a project like this in the future? Was this project an investment in a new discipline for your agency, a great piece for your portfolio that came at extra expense, or something you’re never going to attempt again?

This kind of transparency and candor is rare for most agencies. But when you hear this kind of feedback from everyone across your organization, it can be worth millions to your staff morale. I’ve even worked at agencies where the final postmortem has included detail regarding how each team member billed their hours. (This means your entire staff needs to keep accurate time sheets, and not lie if they’re going to go over their allocated hours on a project.)

Some of your staffers may not run the business, so why should they know how profitable their project is for the owners or parent company of the agency?

The answer is simple: If designers see how their behavior influences stability (and profit) for their employer, they can think more holistically about their actions in the future. Did mismanaged client expectations burn up staff time and profit? Did the team suggest placing a few “bonus concepts” in front of the client, causing extra rounds of changes before down-selection to the final direction? All of this comes out of the company’s pocket, and can be gauged in this closing discussion. Your staff will likely appreciate seeing real big-picture thinking around exactly what this project meant to the agency — just as long as it’s always delivered in a constructive manner. You can then fold this into the solutions you discussed earlier.

6. Highlight the most important thing each team member learned (5 minutes). To close your postmortem meeting, ask each person in the room to put two stars on the whiteboard. One star is drawn beside the most important positive thing to remember from the meeting. The second star is drawn next to the one thing that should be changed going forward. When everyone is done, the facilitator should ask any last clarifying questions regarding everyone’s selections, then thank everyone for coming. Notes from the meeting should go out to everyone in a day or so.

Don’t wait until the end to reflect on project success (and failure)

The postmortem gives staff a chance to fully comprehend what challenges hit each member of the staff and create a dialogue about how everyone can be supported by their agency peers. Think of it as an anthropological journey into exactly how your agency functions.

But you don’t wait until the end to reflect on what’s working for your project. You can hold a pre-mortem, a mid-mortem, whatever you want to call it! See how your team is doing, and start to solve for open issues before the project comes to a close.

Got any tips for designers looking to conduct post-project evaluations? Share them in the comments!

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2011.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

A leading design magazine is back

In 2009, I.D. shut its doors after more than 50 years in print. Now it's being revived online

  • more
    • All Share Services

A leading design magazine is back


The Audi One concept car

The Audi One concept car, designed by Jason Battersby, Transportation Design Masters Programme, Umea Institute of Design 2010. Image courtesy of the Behance network.

Anyone who lamented the passing of I.D., one of the great industrial design magazines of our time, might be heartened to know that it’s back. Sort of. When F+W Media (also owners of Print and HOW magazines) nixed the print publication two years ago, there was such an outcry of shock and disappointment by the design community that the company decided to rethink the I.D. brand. Last week it was reintroduced as a website that showcases the best in product and industrial design being created today.

Designed and powered by Behance, the new site features user-submitted designs from the Behance network that are carefully curated to offer viewers a wide range of innovative work and the artists behind it.

“Many people mourned the loss of I.D. when the print magazine closed, and many of these fans asked us to bring I.D. back, online,” said Gary Lynch, publisher and community leader for the design group at F+W Media. “We’ve considered several ways to accomplish that, but we wanted to do it right, in a way that would do justice to the legacy of the brand. Finding the right partner with an equally strong commitment to the design community was a key objective. For their complementary reach, influence and impact, Behance is the optimum partner. We couldn’t be more excited to kick off this new era for I.D. with them.”

Behance was equally eager to be part of the collaboration to revive I.D. “Our team is thrilled to leverage Behance’s technology to power this new showcase and provide more exposure to the world’s top talent in the areas of industrial and product design,” said Scott Belsky, founder and CEO of Behance.

From 1954 to 2009, I.D. served as one of America’s leading critical magazines covering the art, business and culture of design, garnering a passionate following and multiple National Magazine Awards.


ID redesign

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2011.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the Web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to Salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

What we can learn from lists

An exhibit looks at what these handwritten notes tell us about artists from Picasso to Kline

  • more
    • All Share Services

What we can learn from listsAdolf Konrad's graphic packing list, Dec. 16, 1973

The Finnish-born architect Eero Saarinen once made a list of the positive attributes of his second wife, Aline Bernstein. Written around the time of their marriage, in 1954, it included “I — First I realized that you were very clever,” “VIII — That you were fantastically efficient,” and “X — That you have a very very beautiful body.” (This from the man who designed the TWA terminal at JFK, which shared the same qualities.)


list of Aline Bernstein's good qualities

Eero Saarinen’s list of Aline Bernstein’s good qualities, ca. 1954. Aline and Eero Saarinen papers, 1857-1972.

In 1971, Vito Acconci, coping with his fear of flying, typed a list of instructions for what to do with his apartment should he die in a plane crash on a trip to Halifax. He left an envelope with a key to his apartment at the School of Visual Arts registrar’s office and wrote, “4. In the event of my death, the envelope can be picked up by the first person who calls for it; he will be free to use my apartment, and its contents, any way he wishes.”

For a school assignment in 1932, the designer Harry Bertoia put together “My-self Rating Chart,” in which he listed 21 characteristics and rated himself from very poor to excellent. He got top marks in only Health, Neatness and Accuracy and scored low in Courage and Quickness of Thought.

Picasso, a list maker as well, scribbled down recommendations of artists he liked (Léger, Gris, “Ducham”) for Walt Kuhn, the organizer of the 1913 Armory Show.


Harry Bertoia's

Harry Bertoia’s “My-self Rating Chart” school assignment. Harry Bertoia papers, 1917-1979.


Pablo Picasso's recommendations

Pablo Picasso’s recommendations for the Armory Show for Walt Kuhn, 1912. Walt Kuhn, Kuhn family papers, and Armory Show Records, 1859-1978.

These lists and some 80 others make up the exhibition “Lists: To-dos, Illustrated Inventories, Collected Thoughts, and Other Artists’ Enumerations” from the Smithsonian’s “Archives of American Art,” on view through Oct. 2 at the Morgan Library & Museum. The show exposes the inner OCD of some of the world’s most celebrated artists and designers, from Alexander Calder’s address book to Adolf Konrad’s packing list. And then there are things that hardly seem like lists at all, such as Franz Kline’s receipt for $274.51 from a Greenwich Avenue liquor store on New Year’s Eve, 1960.


Franz Kline's receipt

Franz Kline’s receipt from John Heller’s Liquor Store, Dec. 31, 1960. Elisabeth Zogbaum papers regarding Franz Kline, 1928-1965.


Adolf Konrad's graphic packing list

Adolf Konrad’s graphic packing list, Dec. 16, 1973. Adolf Ferdinand Konrad papers, 1962-2002.

Because list making is a quotidian task, it’s easy to overlook. But the exhibition uses it as a snapshot into artists’ lives, showing what they were thinking about, what they thought they needed to do or buy or see. Most of the lists seem to have been private, and in their unselfconsciousness they reveal bits of whims, habits and mannerisms. For instance, we find out that Joseph Cornell, like many other New Yorkers, visited antiques fairs in search of odd trinkets: swan-shaped butter molds, wax figures, German miniature toys. Apart from the bottles, Kline bought corn flakes, bacon and toilet paper. We see, if we need to be reminded, that great artists and thinkers can’t do everything — some of the to-dos never got crossed out.

Liza Kirwin, the organizer of the show and the curator of manuscripts at the Smithsonian’s “Archives of American Art,” helpfully offers her own list of what she hopes the show will accomplish:

1. Inspire visitors to consider lists as first-hand accounts of our cultural history.

2. Provide insight into the list maker’s personal habits and enrich our understanding of individual biographies.

3. Appeal to our curiosity for the private, personal and creative enumerations of some of America’s most prominent artists.

Kirwin, who also wrote the book by the same name that turned into the Morgan show (Princeton Architectural Press, $24.95), has another, one-point list for evaluating it: “I think that any exhibition that makes you think differently about something is a success.”


Stanton Macdonald-Wright's color wheel

Plate 1, Inherent saturation spectrum” (undated), lists colors, diagramming their relationships and equating them to the signs of the Zodiac. Stanton Macdonald-Wright papers, 1907-1973.

All images courtesy of the Smithsonian Institution’s Archives of American Art.

Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2011.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the Web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to Salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism, and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

How WWII curtailed a design career

When war broke out, Paolo Garretto's brush with fascism made American publishers unwilling to use his work

  • more
    • All Share Services

How WWII curtailed a design career

Many monumental things happened in 1927. In addition to embarking on the road to fame and ubiquity as a graphic artist.

“I also married [his first wife Ariane], went to live in Paris and worked in London,” Paolo Garretto wrote. “But my wife did not like London so I had to commute every week by airplane (Fokkers from the war that were adapted by Air France to make the trip over the Channel).” Over the years he made hundreds of caricatures for the “Great Eight” and for advertising clients too. “It was pleasant for a while,” but then he admitted, “with the years passing by, the faces to caricature were becoming scarce.”

To find other challenges he began doing some work in Italy for Gazzetta del Popolo in Turin (a newspaper for whom he designed a format), Rivista del Popolo d’Italia (Mussolini’s flagship magazine), and Natura, a beautiful Milanese magazine for which he designed the covers, and which were reproduced in the leading advertising arts magazines in Europe and the United States.

The late Twenties was not only a time of political upheaval, but a period when artists believed in the power to change people’s thoughts through graphic design.

“As all others, I was pushed by Cubism, Futurism, Divisionism (what our professors had called ‘stupid inventions to get attention and fame any way possible’). I tried very hard to be different,” wrote Garretto about the genesis of his personal style. “We were all conscious that we were pushing and trying to change something or everything. I recall when Fortunino Mantania, a very famous [art nouveau] illustrator from the turn of the century, came to my father’s house one evening. To get his opinion, I showed him a drawing I had made for a new brand of coffee. He told me to forget, what he called, my ‘fantasies and useless tricks’ and design a nice, nearly naked (Negro) girl embracing the package instead of my smiling Neapolitan cafeteria (coffeepot) pouring coffee in a demi-tasse.” Garretto respected him, but thought his ideas were old fashioned. So instead, “I did my idea and it was bought.”

Garretto’s graphic approach was based on simplification of primary graphic forms into iconic depictions and loose, but poignant likenesses. Vibrant, airbrushed color was his trademark, and he also experimented with different media to create exciting new form, including experiments with collage and modeling clay which proved fruitful. Without his superb draftsmanship what is now pigeon-holed as Deco styling would surely have been a superficial conceit, but his conceptual work was so acute, and his decorative work was so well crafted that he eschewed these pitfalls. Writing in a 1946 issue of Graphis, his old friend and sponsor from the Cafe Aragno days, Orio Vergani, describes Garretto’s ingenuity this way:

“Once the constructive theme of his images is discovered, Garretto proceeds to the invention of the media necessary for executing them. I believe he has painted, or rather, constructed his images with everything: scraps of cloth, threads of rayon, with the bristles of his shaving brush, with straw, strips of metal and mill board, with iron filings and sulpher, tufts of fur and wings of butterflies. His colors are born of a strange alchemy of opposed materials in the light of an artificial sun; he seeks for the squaring of shade as others have sought for the squaring of the circle.”

Though Garretto lived and worked out of his flat in Paris, the City of Lights was no more than a base from which to work for publications and agencies in other major world capitals. He visited Berlin often, where he worked for the Berlin Illustrated News, Leipzig Illustrated, Der Querschnitt, Der Sport im Bilder, and others (until Hitler assumed power and had expelled many of the Jews on the creative staffs of these journals). In London he did advertising work through the London Press Exchange, the most important advertising outfit in the British Empire, basically because Charles Hobson, its director, asked him to do some “modern and surprising posters.” Owing to his own globe trotting and the consequent lack of time for what he called “mondanities” Garretto did not nurture many friendships in Paris. He did, however, know the French masters of poster art, A.M. Cassandre, Jean Carlu, Charles Loupot, and Paul Colin, and was briefly connected to their advertising “agency,” Alliance Graphique owing to his friendship with a Montmartre printer named Dupont. For this agency he did a sketch of a poster for Air France’s new airline, La Fleche d’Orient. It was immediately bought by the client, apparently ruffling the feathers of the other Alliance members whose own attempts to sell their ideas had failed. Avoiding silly rivalries and business minutia was why Garretto invariably preferred to handle most of his other advertising accounts directly with the client. Around this time he met Alexey Brodovitch at his office at Les Trois Quartiers, the chic Parisian department store, for which he was art director. It was an acquaintance that would have interesting consequences later in Garretto’s career.

“I had seen some of Brodovitch’s work,” recalled Garretto, “and was very enthusiastic about his new way to advertise men’s clothes, shoes, and women’s beauty products. For me, an admirer of the [raucous] Futurists, it was very exciting to meet this very calm, controlled Russian.”

Garretto’s caricatures were published in the United States, first by the Philadelphia Ledger and the New York Sunday World, then Fortune Magazine started using covers, and later he did drawings for The New Yorker’s profiles, but his really significant American exposure occurred in October 1930 when Clare Boothe Brokaw, one of Vanity Fair’s chief editors, requested his services in a “flattering but unexpected” letter sent to his Paris home:

Dear Monsieur Garretto,

The Editors were very much impressed with your cartoon of Gandhi in the August issue of Fortune. We had also in our files some excellent caricatures made by you for the December, 1927 issue of the Graphic. It occurred to us that you may possibly have some other caricatures of prominent people, or cartoons of a political, artistic, or social nature, which you maybe able to send us. We should be very glad to consider them for publication in Vanity Fair.

Garretto, however, did not respond until late December after Brokaw insisted in a second note that:

“We are indeed anxious to see your work, and if there is something we can use, we are anxious to do so in a forthcoming issue.”

Garretto no longer hesitated, and immediately sailed to New York to meet his new clients.

“Aside from the satisfaction that I always had through my work, I must say that the Vanity Fair period was really the most exciting of my life,” he recalled with a distinct melancholy about the special time that had passed. “I never had the slightest problem with them — [Frank] Crowninshield was a kind and most comprehensive editor [in chief of Vanity Fair], and what can I say of those beautiful and bright, intelligent Clare Boothe Brokaw (later Luce) and Helen Lawrenson? It was really a joy for me to go to New York every time. Not to speak of my friendship with M.F. Agha [Vanity Fair's legendary art director] whom I had met first in Berlin when he was art director of German Vogue.”

He spent time with Condé Nast in Paris and New York, stayed at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel, and cultivated friendships with many of New York’s rich and famous. It was a charmed life. Fortunately for Garretto’s bank book he was commissioned by the New York office of the Italian Lines to execute some travel posters. For in addition to his fee they provided him with 50% discounted tickets on their transatlantic steamers. Since Garretto commuted to the United States almost as frequently as he went to London, the savings were well appreciated. When he elected to stay at home his working relationship remained unhindered by what today is a comparatively slow means of travel and communications. Indeed he said that it was faster in the 1930s to send a drawing from Paris to New York (usually it took five to six days) than to send a package to Milan (taking ten to fifteen days). Moreover, his rapport with the editors was exemplary, given the commonplace interference in visual matters exercised by editors today.

“In general I would be told that [Vanity Fair] wanted a cover for a certain month and I would conceive it, send it, and then see it published,” he explained. “Only once did I have to rush another cover drawing because the one I had sent could not be used.” In this case the new one became a classic example of Garretto’s caricature as design in the service of polemics. It was rather prescient too, for this cover showed the world sweating under the heat of the Japanese flag (in a reference to an important world naval convention that Japan refused to sign). “Condé Nast wrote me a complimentary letter asking how ‘I came to nurture this idea.’ I told him that I knew the Japanese had no interest in signing a treaty that would limit their control. To me it was quite clear that Japan was growing fast and was very hungry for [power].”

Most of Garretto’s concepts were his own, and were often based on his sometimes profoundly acute — yet other times devastatingly naive — understanding of world politics. In addition to his commercial work, Garretto considered himself a journalist. He had been affiliated with newspapers for a long time, and so, as the war clouds over Europe began to darken and swell in the late Thirties, Garretto was allowed to travel owing to his long standing affiliation with the Italian Press Association, which made it possible for him to get visas for almost any country. When the war suddenly broke out in 1940 he was, however, in Turin art directing — “changing the face” — of the Gazzetta del Popolo and, because he was an Italian citizen could not get a visa to return to Paris to be with his wife (whom he later divorced) and son who where stranded when the French frontier was closed to foreigners. Instead he left for New York from Naples on the steamship Conte di Savoia, which was filled to capacity with Americans fleeing the future battleground. On board he shared a table with John Paul Getty,

“who wanted to be left alone and was upset when he learned I was a newspaperman, but was mollified when I drew a caricature of him. He later told me to call him if I needed anything in the United States.”

Back in New York, Garretto worked for his friend M.F. Agha who took over at Vogue after Vanity Fair had folded. He did covers for others. One such commission was earned a year before, through Brodovitch and editor Carmel Snow, who offered him a contract to design the twelve 1940 covers for Vogue’s competitor, Harper’s Bazaar. But as an American war with Germany and Italy was quickly becoming inevitable, Garretto’s past association would prove an insurmountable obstacle in his attempt to do more work and be allowed to stay in New York. The first problem arose with Harper’s Bazaar. Before leaving for Turin in 1939 he had completed finishes on two of the covers. When he returned he was anxious to complete the rest. But neither Snow (who was working with her publisher Wm. Hearst in California) nor Brodovitch (who was on vacation) could be found to discuss the jobs.

“So I started to work on ideas for covers for February and March,” he recalled. “Some time after this I reached Brodovitch, who told me in the nicest and kindest way he could that my contract was broken.”

Garretto learned through the grapevine that a biography, titled “Fascist Artist,” printed in Vanity Fair in 1934 was making the rounds of Harper’s Bazaar, and given the tenor of the times the editors refused to give this “Fascist Artist” any work.

“Happily for me,” wrote Garretto, “I always had Condé Nast and Fortune to accept me, so I carried on, nevertheless with a bit of bitterness, as you can understand. I later heard from Agha that Brodovitch had told him that he suffered but had to ‘obey orders.’ In my opinion he obeyed orders too strictly.”

Garretto was also given certain jobs to keep spirit and soul alive, including the re-rendering of Cassandre’s original Dubonet Man. It was assigned to Garretto by Paul Rand, then the art director of The Weintraub Agency that handled the account. Rand told me:

“Garretto was a masterful artist, and accepted this job without any reservation or resentment even though I was not asking him for his own ideas.”

Because of the danger of war, President Roosevelt had stated that no German or Italian citizen could get a quota visa for the United States and Garretto’s visitor’s visa allowed him only a few months sojourn. Covarrubias had assured him that he could help obtain a permanent visa in Mexico, so as to avoid deportation to the Virgin Islands. Unfortunately, this never materialized. However, since one of the many dignitaries Garretto met during his travels was Secretary of State Cordell Hull, he was told by Hull’s secretary that if he returned to Italy he could come back to New York to apply for permanent residency.

“But there was no time for this,” Garretto recalled. “Italy entered the European war. (And in the meantime I married my second wife in New York). I was arrested as were all other Italian newspapermen, and taken first to the Tombs [a New York prison] and then to the Greenbrier in White Sulphur Springs to join the Italian, German, and Japanese diplomatic internees. After six months we were embarked on the Grottingholm, a Swedish boat as old as Noah’s ark, to Lisbon where wagon-lit trains were waiting to take us to our respective countries.”

Just as his fling with Fascism was tolerated in America before the war, his farcical caricatures of Mussolini and Hitler (published in the United States) were only tolerated in Italy until war broke out. Garretto had heard that Mussolini was not pleased with a certain anti-war article he had written a few years earlier. So when he returned to Rome, Garretto was not in favor. And when he refused to do propaganda (owing, he wrote in a rather far-fetched statement, to an FBI declaration that he signed before being deported not to do any anti-U.S. propaganda) he was forced to come up with an idea that would prove his patriotism and not land him in an Italian prison for insubordination or treason. His brilliant idea, which is quite funny in hindsight, was to help teach Italian to those peoples conquered by the victorious Fascist forces.

“I had patented an idea to teach our vocabulary through the movies,” wrote Garretto. “One would see a cartoon, a short (with live actors) and through the sound, the image, and written captions could learn the language.”

Garretto was sent with his new wife, Eva, to Budapest to put his invention into practice. His stay was rather pleasant until Mussolini was deposed, exiled, and then reestablished as a puppet by Hitler. This meant that if an Italian living in a German-occupied country did not become a “new Fascist” in support of the new Duce, he or she would be interned as an enemy alien by the Germans. Such was Garretto’s fate for nine months until he and his wife were evacuated by the Germans in the face of the Russian advance. They were eventually deported to Trento, Italy, where they were able to escape from a transport train during an allied air raid, and managed to flee to Milan, where Garretto and his wife were helped by friends, even though they were “suspect citizens,” according to a document they were forced to carry. With the war’s end Garretto returned to Paris as an “ex-enemy.” Though it took time to reestablish himself, he made covers for the fashion magazine Adam and a few other small journals. In Italy he published a children’s book that he had written while interned in Hungary, and worked for several magazines, including Arbiter, Per Voi Signor, and others. In 1946, with the help of some friends, he was able to get a visa to return to the United States, where he designed a perfume bottle that was produced by Lucien Lelong. But generally speaking, in the United States his work was not as sought after as before the war.

“It is not me who stopped working for the American magazines,” he wrote in answer to the question, why did he terminate his American associations? “but the American magazines changed a lot. They published less and less drawings. In my time, maybe there were less photographers. And the old art editors died or changed and maybe the new ones did not even know my work! My last serious appearance was in Vogue, in a special section dedicated to [the musical] South Pacific. So you see I did not stop … They did.” Dejected, he returned to France where he worked for the Italian magazine Panorama and other “low circulation, low paying magazines.”

In 1952 Garretto found that living in France became a big problem. He

“started to be singled out by the income tax operators in Paris who found that I had not paid income tax in France on what I was earning in the U.S., Italy, etc. It was useless to tell them that I paid regularly in those different countries. So they fixed a big fine — too big for me to pay — and I decided to leave Paris and start again in Monaco where there is no income tax, but they tax you indirectly through prices that are higher than in France or Italy.”

Until Garretto’s death in August 1989, he actively pursued his life’s work. Though appearing only once in an American publication since the early fifties — actually in a subscription flyer for Condé Nast’s Traveller — he has had many exhibitions throughout Italy and a critical biography about him was published in Naples. Yet despite today’s retro-illustrators who have borrowed and made a success of the Garretto approach, his own contemporary work, including portraits done in his 1930s style of the Beatles, Margaret Thatcher, and Liza Minnelli, is quite out of sync with the times. Stale even. Regardless of Garretto’s formidable drafting skills, his more recent representations of contemporary personalities lacked the intuitive strength that underscored his earlier work. Perhaps it might also be argued that the famous and infamous of the Twenties and Thirties are bigger than life while today’s are merely human scale. Maybe Margaret Thatcher could never be as powerfully charged a portrait as Benito Mussolini. Whether Garretto’s contemporary work holds up or not, the work he did during his heyday will be remembered among the most innovative caricature and illustrative design of the golden age of graphic style.





Copyright F+W Media Inc. 2011.

Salon is proud to feature content from Imprint, the fastest-growing design community on the Web. Brought to you by Print magazine, America’s oldest and most trusted design voice, Imprint features some of the biggest names in the industry covering visual culture from every angle. Imprint advances and expands the design conversation, providing fresh daily content to the community (and now to salon.com!), sparking conversation, competition, criticism and passion among its members.

Continue Reading Close

Page 37 of 47 in Imprint