<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Internet Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/internet_culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Internet doomsday, explained</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to media reports, July 9 will be our online apocalypse. The better story is how this crazy rumor started]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apocalyptic story line was once reserved for truly apocalyptic events. Nuclear war. The return of Christ. Environmental or economic collapse. But it’s 2012, and the apocalypse has become the basis for everything from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxFYYP8040A">Super Bowl commercials </a>to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4fwCCVt9yk">summer romantic comedies </a>-- and no media story is too small to have an apocalyptic moniker attached to it. (Remember Snowmageddon?) If you want to get the world’s attention, simply proclaim that the world will soon end -- or the Internet. Just read coverage of the so-called Internet Doomsday virus, which will supposedly strike and shut down the Web on July 9.</p><p>Here's how the story got started. Back in October, the FBI announced that it had broken up an international crime ring when it arrested six Estonians in what was then heralded as <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/8881382/FBI-Operation-Ghost-Click-raid-shuts-down-cyber-criminals.html">“the biggest cyber criminal takedown in history.”</a> The Estonians had, over the course of four years, hijacked more than 4 million computers in 100 countries through the use of malware known as DNSChanger. By redirecting the infected browsers of unwitting users, DNSChanger was able to send high volumes of traffic to the criminal ring’s rogue websites and servers, collecting more than $14 million in fraudulent advertising revenue and exposing their victims to information theft in the process.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/internet_doomsday_explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobody ever calls me anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/nobody_ever_calls_me_anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/nobody_ever_calls_me_anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Phones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel like the last person who still likes talking on the phone. Why did we give it up, and should we reconsider?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a teenager, my friend Jennifer used to sneak into her mother’s room after bedtime and steal the phone. She would call the boy she was dating, or “going with,” or whatever we called it back then, and they would talk all night, sometimes till 4 a.m.</p><p>But something shifted a few years ago. She became afraid of talking on the phone. Just hearing it ring could provoke panic. Maybe it was the suffocation of carrying her cellphone all day long. (“There are these tentacles in you all the time,” she said.) But she rarely answered the phone, preferring to text message, and the voice mail piled up like unopened bills dumped in a desk drawer – frightening and unknown and ever present -- until she couldn’t bear it anymore, and in a rush of guilt she would delete dozens of messages that had been left for her without even listening to them.</p><p>Sometimes she would text the person to find out what they needed: “Sorry I missed your call,” she would type, although technically she wasn’t, and technically she hadn’t. Instead, like so many people I know, she had simply stopped using her phone for the one purpose Edison intended: to speak to another person.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/nobody_ever_calls_me_anymore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/nobody_ever_calls_me_anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who owns the cloud?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/who_owns_the_cloud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/who_owns_the_cloud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google claims users retain intellectual property rights, but the terms of service tell a more complex story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you hear the phrase “property rights,” you probably think of farmers fighting environmental regulators and homeowners arguing with oil drillers. But in the Information Age, you should also be thinking about your computer – and asking, how much of you is really yours? It’s not a navel-gazing rumination from a college Intro to Existentialism class – it’s an increasingly pressing question in the brave new world of social networking and cloud computing.</p><p>Last week’s big technology announcement spotlighted the thorny issue. As the Los Angeles Times reported, Google’s announcement of its “Google Drive” came with the promise that users will “retain ownership of any intellectual property rights that you hold in that content.” But when you save files to Google’s new hard-drive folder in the cloud, the terms of service you are required to agree to gives Google “a worldwide license to use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works, communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute (your) content” as the company sees fit.</p><p>When asked about this, Google argued that its provisions merely “enable us to give you the services you want - so if you decide to share a document with someone, or open it on a different device, you can.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/who_owns_the_cloud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/who_owns_the_cloud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons of a baby bucket list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/lessons_of_a_baby_bucket_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/lessons_of_a_baby_bucket_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avery Lynn Canahuati accomplished a lot in her six months of life. Imagine what the rest of us can do in a lifetime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What have you accomplished since November? What dreams have you fulfilled? In that time, Avery Lynn Canahuati threw out the first pitch at a baseball game, got a letter from the president and dressed up like a troll doll. She experienced deep love, and changed the lives of her family and friends. And that's just what Canahuati got done in the first six months of her life. They were also the last.</p><p>Canahuati was born in Texas on Nov. 11. This past Good Friday, she was diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a group of rare neuromuscular diseases that, in her case, were terminal. "We asked our doctors specifically if there is anything. Is there trial drugs, anything out of the country?" her mother, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/01/us/texas-baby-bucket-list/index.html">Linda, told CNN</a> this week. So after "sitting around for two days crying and being devastated, since there is no cure and there is nothing we can do," her father, Mike, decided to make the most of what was left of his daughter's cruelly brief expected lifespan. Writing in Avery's voice, he created a blog -- and set a few goals.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/lessons_of_a_baby_bucket_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/lessons_of_a_baby_bucket_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pinterest&#8217;s gender trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/pinterests_gender_trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/pinterests_gender_trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a host of male-centered "pinning" sites arrive, can the female-centric phenomenon continue its success?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's one of the biggest online success stories of the decade, attracting a staggering <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/your_pinterest_cheat_sheet/">10 million monthly uniques</a> faster than any site in history. But what makes the rise of the image-sharing <a href="http://pinterest.com/">Pinterest</a> surprising isn't its stampeding growth, or its sudden ubiquity on your friends' Facebook walls. It's the fact that it's a raging success story with an unmistakably female bent.</p><p>Even a cursory glance at Pinterest makes it easy to see why so many of its critics have been dismissive about it – specifically about its girlishness. In Salon earlier this year, Jude Stewart called the site<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/your_pinterest_cheat_sheet/"> "basically online scrapbooking."</a> Slate's Farhad Manjoo summed it up in a feature called <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2011/12/pinterest_the_visual_pinboard_for_people_who_like_cupcakes_and_jake_gyllenhaal_.html">"Cupcakes, Boots, and Shirtless Jake Gyllenhaal,"</a> wherein he admitted, "I just don't get it." And when I first looked at Pinterest, my initial impression was "social networking for cat ladies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/pinterests_gender_trouble/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/pinterests_gender_trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draw Something, decoded</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/draw_something_decoded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/draw_something_decoded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12908861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newest mobile app sensation isn\'t just a game -- it\'s an intimate new form of nonverbal communication]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Upon first brush, there’s not too much to grasp on to with <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/draw-something-free/id488628250?mt=8">Draw Something.</a> The title of the game is essentially its elevator pitch: You are presented with three words, then you pick one, and then have a blank canvas on your smartphone/tablet/whatever to, well, draw something. You use your finger to draw some stuff on the screen, which ten times out of nine comes out as some sub-MS Paint-worthy scribble. The person you’re playing with then guesses what you just drew. Then, they draw something. You watch this happen, all in real time. And on a certain level, that’s it. Pictionary for the digital age. But why do we play Draw Something so obsessively, like an alcoholic returning to the bar for just one more round, and then another? Perhaps there is something downright pedestrian about Draw Something. Then again, that might be the point.</p>
</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/draw_something_decoded/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/draw_something_decoded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post-literate media</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/post_literate_media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/post_literate_media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12907882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more data we collect via Google, YouTube and Facebook, the less likely we are to understand what it means]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men, and German to my horse. </em><br />
-- Emperor Charles V</p><p>But in which language does one speak to a machine, and what can be expected by way of response? The questions arise from the accelerating data-streams out of which we’ve learned to draw the breath of life, posed in consultation with the equipment that scans the flesh and tracks the spirit, cues the ATM, the GPS and the EKG, arranges the assignations on Match.com and the high-frequency trades at Goldman Sachs, catalogs the pornography and drives the car, tells us how and when and where to connect the dots and thus recognize ourselves as human beings.</p><p>Why then does it come to pass that the more data we collect -- from Google, YouTube and Facebook -- the less likely we are to know what it means?</p><p>The conundrum is in line with the late Marshall McLuhan’s noticing 50 years ago the presence of “an acoustic world,” one with “no continuity, no homogeneity, no connections, no stasis,” a new “information environment of which humanity has no experience whatever.” He published "Understanding Media" in 1964, proceeding from the premise that “we become what we behold,” that “we shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/post_literate_media/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/post_literate_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mom, get off Twitter!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courtney Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12871821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtney Love's recent missteps point to an emerging problem: The oversharing Gen-Xer with a social media account]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn't that long ago that a generational social media disaster looked like "<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/shitmydadsays ">S#&amp;% My Dad Says</a>." It was amusing, the way <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/09/29/old_people/">The Olds</a> were inadvertently posting on their adult offsprings' Facebook walls and thinking it was email. Look at them, with their lack of technical acumen and their crotchety pleas for assistance! You know what embarrassing your kids looks like now? Courtney Love.</p><p>Granted, Ms. Love has never been the traditional SUV-driving, cookie-baking kind of mom who <a href="http://www.stfuparentsblog.com/">posts incredibly detailed stuff about her baby's poops</a>.  But her recent slew of attention-getting Twitter insanity -- and her 19-year-old daughter Frances Bean's mortified response – suggests we are entering a new era of fail, one in which a parent's awkward behavior isn't of the adorable "What's this button do?" variety. Instead, it may be more like "S#&amp;% My Dad Said At Burning Man."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mom_get_off_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backstage at the Final Four</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/backstage_at_the_final_four/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/backstage_at_the_final_four/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12860081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As media explodes, up close with the Twitter wars, massive egos, fancy buffets and flirty reporters at the big game]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s around 11 a.m. the day before the 2012 Final Four begins at the New Orleans Superdome, and fans of Ohio State, Kansas, Kentucky and Louisville are teeming along both sides of Canal Street, some with Mardi Gras beads in school colors. There’s friendly trash-talk as they duck in and out of shops glutted with Big Easy-themed Final Four T-shirts, hats, glassware. In the lobby of the Marriott, the media hotel, fans gawk at famous college coaches in track suits -- and there goes CBS color announcer <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZ6Uhwzk4O4">Bill Raftery,</a> who could pass for any silver-haired businessman in a suit, except he’s <em>Bill Raftery</em>, famous for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yDunXozn9k">shouting</a> “Strokin’ a little nylon!” (when the ball swishes through the net) and “The kiss!” (a successful bank-shot). Former Ohio State All-American <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Jackson_%28basketball%29">Jim Jackson</a> greets Buckeye fans, and as I ride up the escalator to get my media credential, down comes Missouri coach Frank Haith, the national coach of the year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/backstage_at_the_final_four/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/backstage_at_the_final_four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Salon troll on the couch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/a_salon_troll_on_the_couch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/a_salon_troll_on_the_couch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12851311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angry comments are one thing. But what's behind the urge to slam writers with psychiatric diagnoses?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, Huffington Post Parents ran a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-coburn/helicoptering-and-oversharing_b_1411308.html">post by novelist Jennifer Coburn</a> responding to critics of her earlier <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/">Salon piece</a> in which she described her intense reaction to the text breakup her 14-year-old daughter received from her first boyfriend.</p><p>HuffPo Parents editor <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-belkin/parents-oversharing-online_b_1385042.html">Lisa Belkin had written an essay</a> shortly after the Salon piece ran, in which she questioned the ethics of bloggers who expose their kids’ private lives for big blog traffic and book deals, citing Coburn and <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/28/the-biggest-threat-of-dara-lynn-weiss-and-vogue-s-7-year-old-on-a-diet.html">fat-shaming mom Dara Lynn-Weiss</a> as prime examples of blurry-boundaried mommy bloggers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/a_salon_troll_on_the_couch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/a_salon_troll_on_the_couch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do I friend the dad who left?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/do_i_friend_the_dad_who_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/do_i_friend_the_dad_who_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12835961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For nearly three decades I said I didn\'t care that he bolted. Then I discovered how wrong I was]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I saw my father, I searched his face for traces of me, for something that connected us in an indisputable way. I hoped he'd have the same smile or the same long forehead. But I was disappointed to find he was still as much a stranger as he'd been all my life. I had expected him to be tall and lanky like me, but he was heavier set. His face was round and dark, his eyes deep-set and tired. There was one genetic gift I spied: Thick eyebrows, dark caterpillars crawling across his forehead. Of course, I'd hated those eyebrows all my life.</p><p>I had so many other questions to ask: What did he do for a living? Did he have other children? Was he married? Did he drink coffee? Was he happy? Were there pictures of me -- a smiling, chubby baby -- on the walls of his home or was it easier for him to forget I ever existed?</p><p>But I could not ask him any of this, because we had not actually met in person. At the age of 27, I saw my father for the first time when I found him on Facebook.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/do_i_friend_the_dad_who_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/do_i_friend_the_dad_who_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of crowdfunding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/in_praise_of_crowdfunding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/in_praise_of_crowdfunding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12837231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The JOBS Act is getting slammed as a sellout to Wall Street. But it's not all bad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/why-obamas-jobs-act-couldnt-suck-worse-20120409">the left's response to the passage of the JOBS Act</a> last week, the United States is now once again safe for fraud, Wall Street shenanigans, and old-school '90s style dot-com flim-flam. The basic take is that the bill signed into law by President Obama on April 5 proves that we've learned nothing since reckless financial "innovation" plunged the world into a massive recession. Instead of tightening the screws, we're loosening them. A bill that is supposed to make it easier for startups to get funded and grow (and create jobs) is actually just an invitation for Big Capital to be as reckless as they wanna be.</p><p>The critique may well hold true for large deregulatory swathes of the new law -- it didn't generate massive Republican support for nothing, after all. But there's one piece that's getting <a href="http://robertreich.org/post/20364660524">unfairly castigated</a> and it just happens to be something that could have enormous <em>progressive </em>potential. It's the piece called "crowdfunding": the Internet-enabled aggregation of lots of small sums of cash as way to raise capital for individuals or enterprises who would otherwise face an uphill battle getting the attention of banks or well-heeled investors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/in_praise_of_crowdfunding/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/in_praise_of_crowdfunding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I, Luddite</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/i_luddite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/i_luddite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12789731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up, I thought it was cool to shun technology. Now, at 33, that attitude is ruining my life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was having a cigarette with a 23-year-old bartender named Marty when we started talking about social media.</p><p>“I just use Facebook to meet up with friends or to know what’s happening next week,” he said. “My parents and older people abuse Facebook. They put too much out there.” Like a lot of young adults, Marty doesn't have much use for email, though he uses it with his cousins “as a way to tell longer, more involved stories, mostly about how out of it our parents are.”</p><p>I'm considered part of Marty's generation, despite our 10-year age difference. But the only common ground we had in that conversation was the Phillies and smoking a cigarette in the parking lot of a bar. When it comes to technology, I might as well be his granddad.</p><p>Born in 1978, I’m a millennial in name only. I’m really a Luddite. I don’t get technology, and for a long time I tried to convince myself I didn’t want to get it. My view on the latest cyber advances was lack of interest and occasionally hostility. I imagined that this rejection marked me as an iconoclast or a rugged individualist. A real man listens to Led Zeppelin and doesn’t listen to Led Zeppelin on iTunes -- that sort of thing. Now, thanks to that mulishness and vanity, I feel like a clamshell of a man, outdated and struggling to communicate with the rest of my cohorts’ fancy smartphones. At the age of 33, I've been left behind.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/i_luddite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/i_luddite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The century-old novel right-wingers believe guides Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/the_century_old_novel_right_wingers_believe_guides_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/the_century_old_novel_right_wingers_believe_guides_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12783811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Bill Ayers. Conservatives who see conspiracies are convinced a 1912 novel reveals the president's true plans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“For a long time I have known that this hour would come, and that there would be those of you who would stand affrighted at the momentous change from constitutional government to despotism, no matter how pure and exalted you might believe my intentions to be.</em></p><p><em>“But in the long watches of the night, in the solitude of my tent, I conceived a plan of government which, by the grace of God, I hope to be able to give to the American people. ... (H)ateful as is the thought of assuming supreme power, I can see no other way clearly." -- from "Philip Dru: Administrator"</em></p><p>"Philip Dru, Administrator: A Story of Tomorrow, 1920-1935" is a novel about a successful rebellion against a hopelessly corrupt U.S. government. Its leader then becomes a benevolent dictator, and restores the rule of law to the Republic. Though he didn’t put his name on the book, author Colonel Edward Mandell House was a Texas political insider who worked assiduously to make Woodrow Wilson president. After the 1912 election, he became Wilson’s closest advisor.</p><p>So is it a bad turn-of-the-century novel -- or a Nostradamus-like prediction of America under President Obama?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/the_century_old_novel_right_wingers_believe_guides_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/03/the_century_old_novel_right_wingers_believe_guides_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, Gawker: My 42-point plan helped job seekers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/sorry_gawker_my_42_point_plan_helped_job_seekers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/sorry_gawker_my_42_point_plan_helped_job_seekers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12755141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet howled when I sent 3,000 words of job-hunting advice with a rejection letter. Here's why I did it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've had an interesting week. On Monday morning, I <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/work-blog/2012/mar/29/job-rejection-letter-to-end-all-others">sent</a> a BCC email response to 900 people who applied to a job listing I posted on Craigslist. I’m starting a clean-technology news site and am hiring writers and other editorial staff. By Monday evening, my email had been posted on Gawker along with a headline calling me a "dick" -- and a big pile of comments with even worse names.</p><p>But it's cool. It was worth it.</p><p>Let me back up a bit. The email that I sent to those applicants included a list of 42 job application dos-and-don'ts that I wrote after seeing so many different people make the same mistakes. It was frustrating to see people unknowingly sabotage their chances of finding work by making easily avoidable errors. So I wrote my email and sent it to all of the applicants. My list contains mostly common sense things like “check your spelling” and “don't talk badly about your current or past employer.” (You can read the entire thing <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/87226611/42-Job-Application-Dos-and-Don-ts">here</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/sorry_gawker_my_42_point_plan_helped_job_seekers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/sorry_gawker_my_42_point_plan_helped_job_seekers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>231</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever happened to Ron Paul? He just isn&#8217;t that popular</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/whatever_happened_to_ron_paul_he_just_isnt_that_popular/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/whatever_happened_to_ron_paul_he_just_isnt_that_popular/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12747771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times asks why the libertarian candidate turned out to be less beloved than the Internet made him seem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/28/us/politics/in-ron-pauls-campaign-strength-and-weakness.html?pagewanted=all">The New York Times asks a tough question, today:</a></p><blockquote><p>Whatever happened to Ron Paul?</p></blockquote><p>He, uh... well, this happened to him: He is running for president still but he hasn't won any primaries. He has 50 delegates. The end.</p><p>But <em>how</em> did that happen? How did Ron Paul not win all the primaries and the delegates, after he raised a bunch of money and had big rallies?</p><blockquote><p>His strategists are searching for answers, and one may be that many who turned up for his rallies were less eager to take part in Republican primaries or argue Mr. Paul’s case at Republican caucuses.</p>
<p>Even Mr. Paul cannot entirely explain why the passion he generated, especially among young people and those his campaign identified as motivated supporters, did not translate into more votes.</p>
<p>“I don’t have a full answer for that,” says Mr. Paul, who says he believes ballot irregularities have chipped into his numbers in some places. He adds, “I think there’s some problem with always making sure this energy is translated into getting to the polls.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/whatever_happened_to_ron_paul_he_just_isnt_that_popular/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/whatever_happened_to_ron_paul_he_just_isnt_that_popular/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>254</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Her breakup, my heartbreak</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12738161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My daughter was so mature when her boyfriend ended things. Why was I the one freaking out?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no way I was going to cry over his text. We barely knew each other. These long-distance things hardly ever work out anyway.</p><p>“I’m not sure how I feel about you anymore,” he wrote.</p><p>How could this be? A week earlier, he professed his love. He wanted to change his Facebook status to “in a relationship.” How did it go so wrong so fast?</p><p>More curiously, why was I feeling devastated by my 14-year-old daughter’s first breakup when she seemed unscathed by it? Katie replied to her new ex that these things happen and there were no hard feelings. I couldn’t move on so quickly.</p><p>“He’s not sure how he feels about <em>you?!</em>” I shouted. “You are smart, beautiful and kind. For God’s sake, you play piano for old folks at nursing homes and knit hats to support children in Africa! You’re borderline perfect. What’s he not sure of?”</p><p>Katie told me to take a deep breath. It would all be fine, she assured me. She explained that John was a nice guy whom she enjoyed getting to know, but ultimately they had very different interests. They lived on different coasts. It could never work.</p><p>“But … he was so cute,” I said, pouting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/her_breakup_my_heartbreak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Ortega: the man behind Mitt Romney memes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/matt_ortega_the_man_behind_mitt_romney_memes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/matt_ortega_the_man_behind_mitt_romney_memes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12725221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He hatched Etch a Sketch Mitt Romney and Multiple Choice Mitt. How Matt Ortega uses "microsites" to take on the GOP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What began as an unintentionally revealing analogy at 8:09 a.m. Wednesday needed just six hours to become a full-blown meme. It started with Eric Fehrnstrom on CNN, deadly serious as he explained that his boss Mitt Romney’s campaign was like an Etch A Sketch that could be shaken and reset for the general election. Within hours there were spoof videos, pictures and several competing Twitter hashtags trending worldwide. By 2:14 p.m., the Etch A Sketch had reached what is perhaps the apotheosis of Internet meme-dom: a microsite, EtchASketchMittRomney.com. The site displays two contradictory Romney quotes every time you “shake” it.</p><p>“<a href="https://twitter.com/#!/thegarance/status/182530747431796736">Inevitable</a>,” several prominent journalists tweeted when the site appeared, already steeped in Etch A Sketch riffs for several hours. And while it does feel like these gags arise organically out of the social media ecosystem, they’re not exactly inevitable. Somebody has to make them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/matt_ortega_the_man_behind_mitt_romney_memes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/matt_ortega_the_man_behind_mitt_romney_memes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a petition win justice for Trayvon Martin?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/can_a_petition_win_justice_for_trayvon_martin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/can_a_petition_win_justice_for_trayvon_martin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12705991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the Internet spurred an investigation into the shocking murder of a Florida teenager]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, more than three weeks after 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot and killed, The U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division and the FBI finally announced <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/21/us/justice-department-opens-inquiry-in-killing-of-trayvon-martin.html?_r=1">they would conduct a criminal investigation</a> into the case. Could a groundswell of online outrage help bring justice for a slain teenager?</p><p>Martin's story has sparked grief, anger and expected outbursts of racist online commentary since his death on Feb. 26. That's when George Zimmerman, a <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/trayvon-martin-death-friend-phone-teen-death-recounts/story?id=15959017#.T2icemKXSWW">self-appointed</a> neighborhood watch volunteer and <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/17/2700249/shooter-of-trayvon-martin-a-habitual.html">overeager 911 caller</a>, gunned down a young man with no criminal record after telling police he looked <a href="http://www.orlandosentinel.com/videogallery/68871920/News/George-Zimmerman-911-call-reporting-Trayvon-Martin">"suspicious" and "on drugs." </a>Zimmerman has claimed he was acting in self-defense, a tough assertion to make stick when you kill a young man who was carrying a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea. Zimmerman has not been arrested.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/can_a_petition_win_justice_for_trayvon_martin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/can_a_petition_win_justice_for_trayvon_martin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My fake online boyfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/my_fake_online_boyfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/my_fake_online_boyfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12701751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Todd said he was an entrepreneur who played soccer in Europe. When I decided he was lying, the real deception began]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the evening he canceled our first date that I began to suspect Todd was not a real person. I was drifting off to sleep when the idea dive-bombed into my brain: <em>That guy is a fake</em>. I thought about his dating profile photo -- the Hollywood good looks, the grin of a man accustomed to winning. I thought about the vague fog of his profile, which mentioned exactly none of the accomplishments he told me about in our marathon phone conversations.</p><p>"Isn't it strange that his profile doesn't say that he played professional soccer in Germany?" I asked my friend Mary the following day. I was sitting in her kitchen chair, where I often park myself as the two of us try to untangle some romantic mystery.</p><p>"He told you he played soccer in Germany?" She stifled a laugh. "And you believed him?"</p><p><em>I believed him.</em> Over the next two weeks, as the bizarre story of Todd unfolded, this was the humbling phrase I would be forced to repeat. <em>Yes, I believed him</em>. I believed that he was a wealthy entrepreneur who had started his first company at the age of 20. I believed that he got a soccer scholarship to a liberal arts college in upstate New York and later traveled all over Europe. I believed that he had a daughter, and that she had sparkling blue eyes, and that she liked cats and pirates. I believed these things because -- well, because he told them to me. (Todd is not his real name, by the way.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/my_fake_online_boyfriend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/my_fake_online_boyfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

