<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our real Iraq losses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/our_real_iraq_losses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/our_real_iraq_losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12831801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We left their nation in turmoil and our own country entangled in an endless "national security" nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People ask the question in various ways, sometimes hesitantly, often via a long digression, but my answer is always the same: no regrets.</p><p>In some 24 years of government service, I experienced my share of dissonance when it came to what was said in public and what the government did behind the public’s back. In most cases, the gap was filled with scared little men and women, and what was left unsaid just hid the mistakes and flaws of those anonymous functionaries.</p><p>What I saw while serving the State Department at a forward operating base in Iraq was, however, different. There, the space between what we were doing (the eye-watering waste and mismanagement), and what we were saying (the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0TkpBYDZ3Y&amp;lr=1&amp;user=StateDepartment">endless claims</a> of success and progress), was filled with numb soldiers and devastated Iraqis, not scaredy-cat bureaucrats.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/our_real_iraq_losses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/our_real_iraq_losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaima Alawadi&#8217;s murder: Hate crime or honor killing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/shaima_alawadis_murder_hate_crime_or_honor_killing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/shaima_alawadis_murder_hate_crime_or_honor_killing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12814141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The murder of an Iraqi immigrant in California has stirred rumors of both a hate crime and an honor killing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EL CAJON, Calif. – On March 21, an unknown assailant shattered Shaima Alawadi’s skull with a tire-iron-like weapon in the living room of her home. An Iraqi immigrant and mother of five, Alawadi was found by her 17-year-old daughter, Fatima, who said she was “drowned in her own blood." Alawadi was rushed to the hospital, still alive, but she was soon taken off life support and died March 24. It was, by all accounts, a heinous crime. But was it a hate crime?</p><p>After her mother’s death, Fatima said she found “a letter next to her head saying, ‘Go back to your country, you terrorist.’” The accusation sparked outrage and brought national media attention to the murder. And yet, within days, publicity-craving Islamophobes Pamela Geller and <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/04/murder-of-shaima-al-alawadi-touted-as-an-islamophobic-hate-crime-now-revealed-as-likely-honor-killin.html">Robert Spencer</a> were pushing an alternative motive: that Alawadi’s death was, in fact, an “honor killing.” <a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/04/where-are-the-million-hijabs-against-honor-killings-police-records-cast-doubt-on-california-hate-cri.html">Geller crowed</a>, “I <a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/03/honor-killing-in-california-how-did-the-family-know-so-much.html">surmised that </a>the murder of Shaima Alawadi appeared to be Islamic, rooted in Islamic teachings and culture …”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/shaima_alawadis_murder_hate_crime_or_honor_killing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/shaima_alawadis_murder_hate_crime_or_honor_killing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Iraq and on &#8220;The Wire,&#8221; it&#8217;s all acting for Benjamin Busch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/in_iraq_and_on_the_wire_its_all_acting_for_benjamin_busch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/in_iraq_and_on_the_wire_its_all_acting_for_benjamin_busch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12726091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a lyrical memoir, a novelist's son discusses his strange path into war -- and David Simon's TV masterpiece]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin Busch's "Dust to Dust" is a remarkable book -- part military memoir, part childhood reminiscence, and also an effort to explain his relationship with his father, the celebrated novelist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/25/books/25busch.html">Frederick Busch.</a></p><p>And yet it is also more than all of those things. Busch is filled with complicated and fascinating contradictions. Yes, he's the son of a famously introspective and domestic writer, who grew up in rural New York obsessed with toy guns and building massive military forts. But he studied visual arts at Vassar, where he confused everyone by joining the Marine reserves -- especially his commanders, when he accidentally announced himself in a roll call as part of the "Vassar infantry."</p><p>A man consumed with war, words and images, Busch served two combat tours in Iraq. He proved himself both exceptionally thoughtful and also terribly overconfident. In his first tour, beginning in April 2003, he was the commanding officer of a light armored reconnaissance unit, in a village near Iran. In his second tour, in an exploding Ramadi in 2005, Busch had the impossible job of trying to rebuild a town -- and gain its trust -- while insurgents and sniper fire added to the general lawlessness and lack of any power structure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/in_iraq_and_on_the_wire_its_all_acting_for_benjamin_busch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/24/in_iraq_and_on_the_wire_its_all_acting_for_benjamin_busch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq war booster urges Syria intervention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/29/iraq_war_booster_urges_syria_intervention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/29/iraq_war_booster_urges_syria_intervention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12456211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kanan Mikaya insists we must save a besieged people, but that's what he said about Iraq in 2003. Should we listen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside of the fraudulent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Chalabi">Ahmed Chalabi</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanan_Makiya">Kanan Makiya</a> was the Iraqi exile most influential in driving America to war with Iraq in 2003. His 1989 book "Republic of Fear" was arguably the greatest effort to chronicle and categorize the horror of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. His 1993 work "Cruelty and Silence" was a devastating broadside aimed at the Arab intelligentsia’s refusal to admit the horrors of Saddam. Makiya’s unique credibility and eloquence (he is now a <a href="http://www.brandeis.edu/departments/nejs/faculty/makiya.html">professor at Brandeis</a> University) made him a singularly powerful voice among those who believed it was a moral imperative to overthrow Saddam and democratize Iraq. He met with President George W. Bush and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/magazine/07MAKIYA-t.htm">spoke at</a> the right-wing American Enterprise Institute to make his case, promising that American troops would be greeted as liberators. Peter Beinart, in his final column as editor of the New Republic, <a href="http://www.cfr.org/iraq/different-country/p12736">wrote</a> in regret that he supported the war primarily “because Kanan Makiya did.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/29/iraq_war_booster_urges_syria_intervention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/29/iraq_war_booster_urges_syria_intervention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iraq vets on the road to recovery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/iraq_vets_on_the_road_to_recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/iraq_vets_on_the_road_to_recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12285401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes the best treatment for war wounds is a long bike ride]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last September, I was in the saddle of my bicycle somewhere in the middle of Pennsylvania. Dark green farms materialized from the mist as one hill rolled into another. Somewhere out here, United Airlines Flight 93 crashed.</p><p>In about a day, I would be at the exact place where the plane went down, by the sides of dozens of troops who were injured in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. I was chronicling a solemn moment on the 10thanniversary of the 9/11 attacks for “Recovering,” the documentary film I’m directing about troops who have turned to an unlikely recreation, bicycling, to heal from wounds such as post-traumatic stress disorder and lost limbs.</p><p>But Shanksville was far away. It was raining and cold and I kept pedaling. I was wet, breathing hard, my ass hurt and heart felt like it could burst. I wanted to stop. But that was out of the question. I wasn’t going to let the other cyclists down.</p><p>I looked down at the Garmin mileage tracker on the handlebars of my road cycle. It read: “790.”</p><p>In just 121 miles, it would hit “911.” Then the champagne would flow.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/iraq_vets_on_the_road_to_recovery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/iraq_vets_on_the_road_to_recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The snake oil of  &#8220;Who lost Iraq?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/the_snake_oil_of_who_lost_iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/the_snake_oil_of_who_lost_iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12280911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives fume over Obama's popular pullout from a foolish war -- but don't understand what really happened]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Communist forces took over China in 1949, a debate erupted in U.S. foreign policy circles over “Who lost China?” Amid the growing ferment of the Red Scare, blame was soon affixed to “China hands” in the State Department who, either through incompetence or (more likely, according to Red-hunters like Joe McCarthy) nefarious intent, had neglected to give the anti-Communist forces of Chiang Kai Shek the support they had required, and thus helped deliver China into the hands of America’s enemies, undermining the cause of freedom and democracy. Over the next few years, the hysteria grew to such an extent that eventually even President Dwight Eisenhower was accused by some on the extreme right of abetting the Communist conspiracy through failing to combat it as vigorously as he should have.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/the_snake_oil_of_who_lost_iraq/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/the_snake_oil_of_who_lost_iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawks who learned nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/hawks_who_learned_nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/hawks_who_learned_nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10802551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Iraq to Iran, the geniuses who see no need to remember their mistakes ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This month, after almost nine years that left 4,484 American soldiers and well over 100,000 Iraqi civilians dead, the U.S. war in Iraq came to an end. As the troubling <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/23/world/middleeast/explosions-rock-baghdad-amid-iraqi-political-crisis.html?_r=1&amp;hp">recent</a> <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/iraqi-pm-threatens-to-drop-sunni-bloc-for-shiite-rule-20111222-1p75t.html">reports</a> indicate, the new Iraq will continue to struggle with enduring political tensions and serious security challenges for years to come.</p><p>As my colleague Peter Juul and I noted in our recent report on the war’s costs, <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/12/iraq_ledger_update.html">The Iraq War Ledger</a>, the end of former Iraq President Saddam Hussein’s brutal regime represents a considerable global good, and a nascent democratic Iraqi republic partnered with the United States could potentially yield benefits in the future. But when weighing those possible benefits against the costs of the Iraq intervention, there is simply no conceivable calculus by which Operation Iraqi Freedom can be judged to have been a successful or worthwhile policy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/hawks_who_learned_nothing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/hawks_who_learned_nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Iraq &#8220;worth it&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/was_iraq_worth_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/was_iraq_worth_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10654231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same cost-benefit analyses deployed against social programs should be applied to our military misadventures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the American occupation of Iraq officially coming to a close this week (and I stress "officially" because <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/no_the_u_s_is_not_leaving_iraq/">it's not actually ending</a>), so begins the psychological battle for the memory of that military adventure. Just as the post-Vietnam period saw a sustained campaign by militarists to revise the history of that war and manufacture politicized stories about why it went badly -- the 1980s told us it was lost because <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Spitting-Image-Memory-Legacy-Vietnam/dp/0814751474">troops supposedly got spit on</a>, politicians supposedly micromanaged the war, not because the war was a bad idea -- the same militarists will seek to change our recollection of the Iraq adventure, so as to make sure a future adventure (perhaps against Iran) will be politically possible.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/was_iraq_worth_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/20/was_iraq_worth_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, the U.S. is not leaving Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/no_the_u_s_is_not_leaving_iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/no_the_u_s_is_not_leaving_iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10490541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousands of armed U.S. private contractors will be based in the country, and the potential for violence is real]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a speech at Fort Bragg, N.C., Wednesday, President Obama declared that the war in Iraq is over.</p><p>"I’ve come to speak to you about the end of the war in Iraq," he told gathered troops. "Over the last few months, the final work of leaving Iraq has been done. Dozens of bases with American names that housed thousands of American troops have been closed down or turned over to the Iraqis.  Thousands of tons of equipment have been packed up and shipped out. Tomorrow, the colors of United States Forces-Iraq -- the colors you fought under -- will be formally cased in a ceremony in Baghdad."</p><p>All the specifics were true. But what about Obama's claim that the war has come to a end?</p><p>The truth is more complicated. It turns out the Obama administration is leaving behind a huge contingent from the State Department along with thousands of armed private contractors. The possibility for violence between Americans and Iraqis is very real.</p><p>To dig into the details, I spoke to Spencer Ackerman, who has been <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/author/spencer_ackerman/">covering</a> the issue closely for Wired's Danger Room.</p><p><strong>The administration is saying the war is over. Is the Defense Department leaving anyone behind? </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/no_the_u_s_is_not_leaving_iraq/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/no_the_u_s_is_not_leaving_iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Hitch was wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10485431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was disastrously wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The late Christopher Hitchens had the professional contrarian's fixation on attacking sacred cows, and rather soon after his cancer diagnosis, he became one himself. I think he would've been disgusted to see too much worshipful treacle being written about him upon his untimely death, so let's remember that in addition to being a zingy writer and masterful debater, he was also a bellicose warmongering misogynist.</p><p>Upon the death of the unlamented Earl Butz, Hitchens <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2008/02/truth_and_consequences.html">excoriated editors who published sanitized obituaries</a> of a man remembered solely for a vulgar racist remark made in public. Hitchens leaves a rather more varied legacy, but it's just as important not to whitewash his role in recent history.</p><p>There was no more forceful intellectual voice in support of the Iraq War than Hitchens. There were others who were more prominent, more influential or more persuasive, but Hitchens was the perfect shill for an administration looking to cast its half-baked invasion plans as a morally righteous intervention, because only he could call upon a career of denunciations of totalitarianism and defenses of human rights. (The fact that the war was <em>supposed</em> to be justified by weapons Saddam was supposedly developing didn't really matter to Hitchens.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/17/when_hitch_was_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: &#8220;Hell and Back Again&#8221; shows the true cost of war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/pick_of_the_week_hell_and_back_again_shows_the_true_cost_of_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/pick_of_the_week_hell_and_back_again_shows_the_true_cost_of_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restrepo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10104896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: A gung-ho Marine comes home a wreck in the lyrical, haunting documentary \"Hell and Back Again\"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Sgt. Nathan Harris' Marine company was sent behind Taliban lines in southern Afghanistan in the summer of 2009, as part of a major assault meant to extend the Afghan government's control deep into rebel territory, their commanding officer delivered an inspiring speech, telling his men that Echo Company would change history, and that "the world will notice what you do here." It didn't. Back in the Wal-Mart in suburban North Carolina, where Harris sometimes shows total strangers the gruesome scar that runs from his right buttock all the way to his ankle, it seems more like the world doesn't really want to know much about what happens in Afghanistan, where a decade of war has produced no clear results, at prodigious and debilitating cost.</p><p>I don't think photojournalist-turned-filmmaker <a href="http://www.danfungdennis.com">Danfung Dennis</a> includes that officer's speech in his compassionate and unsettling documentary <a href="http://hellandbackagain.com">"Hell and Back Again"</a> (winner of a Grand Jury Prize and a cinematography prize at Sundance) for some heavy-handed ironic effect, or to score political points. This isn't that kind of movie. There have been several powerful war documentaries about the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq (I'd put Tim Hetherington and Sebastian Junger's <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/07/01/restrepo">"Restrepo"</a> and Janus Metz's <a href="http://entertainment.salon.com/2011/04/15/armadillo/">"Armadillo"</a> at the top of the list), but perhaps none with the intimate, human, tragic and sympathetic impact of "Hell and Back Again."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/pick_of_the_week_hell_and_back_again_shows_the_true_cost_of_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/pick_of_the_week_hell_and_back_again_shows_the_true_cost_of_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama poised to break Iraq pullout promise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/obama_iraq_promise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/obama_iraq_promise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/12/obama_iraq_promise</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president promised early on to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. What changed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903285704576558920049021018.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">debate</a> is unfolding in official Washington about whether the Obama administration should leave any troops in Iraq, and, if so, how many. Negotiations are ongoing between the U.S and Iraqi governments on the issue, as a 2008 agreement requires that all American troops leave by the end of the year.</p><p>But largely missing from the discussion is the fact that if Obama leaves <em>any</em> troops in Iraq, he will be violating one of the first major promises of his presidency. In February 2009, just a month into his tenure, Obama <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/28/washington/28troops.html">delivered</a> an Iraq speech at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, declaring:</p><p>"I intend to remove all U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of 2011. We will complete this transition to Iraqi responsibility, and we will bring our troops home with the honor that they have earned."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/obama_iraq_promise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/obama_iraq_promise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>60 killed as wave of violence rolls across Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/ml_iraq_59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/ml_iraq_59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/15/ml_iraq_59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dozens of lives lost in bomb blasts across the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bomb blasts ripped through more than a dozen Iraqi cities Monday, killing 60 security forces and civilians in the worst attack this year, one that highlighted al-Qaida's resolve and ability to wreak havoc.</p><p>The bloodbath comes less than two weeks after Iraqi officials said they would be open to a small number of U.S. forces staying in the country past a Dec. 31 withdrawal deadline.</p><p>The blasts were coordinated to go off Monday morning and included parked car bombs, roadside bombs, a suicide bomber driving a vehicle that rammed into a police station and even bombs attached to lightpoles.</p><p>The scope of the violence -- seven explosions went off in different towns in Diyala province alone -- emphasized that insurgents are still able to carry out attacks despite repeated crackdowns by Iraqi and U.S. forces.</p><p>Iraqis were furious at security officials and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.</p><p>"Where is the government with all these explosions across the country? Where is al-Maliki? Why doesn't he come to see?" said Ali Jumaa Ziad, a shopowner in Kut, where the worst of the violence occurred. Ziad was brushing pieces of human flesh from the floor and off equipment in his shop.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/ml_iraq_59/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/ml_iraq_59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panetta&#8217;s profanity-laced, flub-filled trip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/panetta_misstatements_profanities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/panetta_misstatements_profanities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/15/panetta_misstatements_profanities</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Defense Secretary's maiden voyage abroad was a memorable one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newly minted Defense Secretary Leon Panetta inexplicably sprinkled his recently completed trip to to Iraq and Afghanistan with misstatements and mild profanities, earning some unfortunate headlines. Here are some highlights from the 73-year-old former CIA chief's travels:</p><p>&#160;</p><ul>
<li>&#160;"Dammit, make a decision." Panetta expresses his frustration with Iraq's delay in making a decision on whether to ask the U.S. to keep some of its 46,000 troops in the country past the end of the year.</li>
<li>&#160;"This damn country has a hell of a lot of resources," Panetta told troops in Baghdad. The New York Times counted "16 cheerful 'damns' and 'hells'"during 28 minutes of remarks.</li>
<li>During the same speech, he described the operation to kill "that son of a bitch" Osama bin Laden.</li>
<li>Panetta told reporters that the United States would keep 70,000 troops in Afghanistan until the end of 2014. The White House has pledged to bring many more service members home by then and aides were quick to say that Panetta had misspoken.</li>
<li>As President George W. Bush did before him, Panetta suggested the United States' invasion of Iraq in 2003 was related to the presence of al-Qaida there, telling troops in Baghdad that "the reason you guys are here is because on 9/11 the United States got attacked." This is something the Obama White House has denied.</li>
</ul><p>&#160;</p><p>What could possibly account for Panetta's seemingly of-the-cuff manner? The Defense Secretary had a suggestion on MSNBC on Monday night: "I'm Italian, what the frick can I tell you?"</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/panetta_misstatements_profanities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/15/panetta_misstatements_profanities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK veterans group severs ties with News of World</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eu_britain_phone_hacking_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eu_britain_phone_hacking_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/07/07/eu_britain_phone_hacking_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Report reveals that News Corp. publication targeted relatives of military personnel killed in Iraq]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain's military veterans organization severed its ties with the News of the World on Thursday following a report that a detective employed by the tabloid newspaper had collected telephone numbers of relatives of military personnel killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.</p><p>The Royal British Legion said that it was dropping the newspaper as a partner in campaigns related to veterans' issues and had suspended all other ties until the allegations are resolved.</p><p>The Legion said it was also reviewing its advertising in other News International papers, including The Times and The Sun.</p><p>The Legion acted after The Daily Telegraph reported that telephone numbers of relatives of dead military personnel had been found in files amassed by a detective formerly employed by the News of the World.</p><p>"We can't with any conscience campaign alongside News of the World on behalf of armed forces families while it stands accused of preying on these same families in the lowest depths of their misery," the Legion said.</p><p>"The hacking allegations have shocked us to the core."</p><p>The detective, Glenn Mulcaire, served a prison sentence after being convicted in 2007 of hacking voice messages in phones of the royal family.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eu_britain_phone_hacking_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/07/eu_britain_phone_hacking_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Juan Cole reading list, 2005 to 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of the Michigan professor's Salon pieces from the time he was reportedly under the CIA's watch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/cia/index.html?story=/news/feature/2011/06/16/cia_juan_cole">revelations of a former CIA operative,</a> the Bush White House and the CIA asked officers to spy on university professor, blogger and Salon contributor, Juan Cole in 2005 and 2006. Cole was one of the most outspoken critics of the Iraq war and Bush's fore gin policy.&#160; Below is just a short selection of Cole's contributions to Salon in 2005 and 2006; examples of writing allegedly deemed concerning enough for the Bush establishment to invite CIA surveillance.</p><ul>
<li><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/07/08/blowback">Writing in response to the deadly blasts on the London Underground in July 2005</a>, Cole criticized "Bush and Blair's incompetently pursued war on terror." he wrote, "If Americans look closer... they will realize that Bush's incompetent crusade has made the world more dangerous, not less."</li>
<li>Similarly, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/07/21/iran/">Cole skewered the Bush administration when newly elected Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari seemed to be developing close ties with Iran.</a> "All the sorts of contracts and deals that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney had imagined for Halliburton, and that the Pentagon neoconservatives had hoped for Israel, were heading instead due east," Cole noted at the time.</li>
<li>Then in March 2006, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/03/01/worst">as violence in Iraq was peaking, Cole wrote that</a> "bloody events in Iraq have undermined American authority in that country and in the Middle East more generally."</li>
<li>He was also fiercely critical of Bush's rhetoric on Iraq. When the president avoided describing the situation there as a "civil war," (a term the Iraqi prime minister employed), <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/03/23/civil_war">Cole emphasized how wrong Bush was.</a></li>
<li>Similarly, Cole noted that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/12/30/saddam">Saddam Hussein's execution, decreed through what he described as "the bumbling of the U.S.-backed regime,"</a> was little more than an act of revenge that turned the dictator into a martyr.</li>
<li>And Cole broadened his sights beyond Iraq. He wrote scathingly about Bush's approach to Israel and Palestine and was quick to point to the problems with how the then-President responded to Hamas' victory in legislative elections in Gaza in 2006. "<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2006/01/27/hamas">How do you like your democracy now, Mr Bush?</a>" Cole wrote.</li>
</ul><p>Evidently, with a voice as influential as Cole's, calling the focal point of an administration's foreign policy "a colossal misadventure" makes waves; the White House and the CIA may not have taken heed of his writing, but -- if recent reports are to be believed -- it certainly caught their attention.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/16/juan_cole_reading_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What withdrawal from Iraq?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/iraq_occupation_withdrawal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/iraq_occupation_withdrawal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/07/iraq_occupation_withdrawal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. military may slowly be leaving, but it's being replaced with an ever-growing State Department presence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way out on the edge of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wemeantwell/">Forward Operating Base Hammer</a>, where I lived for much of my year in Iraq as a Provincial Reconstruction Team leader for the U.S. Department of State, there were several small hills, lumps of raised dirt on the otherwise frying-pan-flat desert. These were "tells," ancient garbage dumps and fallen buildings.</p><p>Thousands of years ago, people in the region used sun-dried bricks to build homes and walls. Those bricks had a lifespan of about 20 years before they began to crumble, at which point locals just built anew atop the old foundation. Do that for a while, and soon enough your buildings are sitting on a small hill.</p><p>At night, the tell area was very dark, as we avoided artificial light in order not to give passing insurgents easy targets. In that darkness, you could imagine the earliest inhabitants of what was now our base looking at the night sky and be reminded that we were not the first to move into Iraq from afar. It was also a promise across time that someday someone would undoubtedly sit atop our own ruins and wonder whatever happened to the Americans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/iraq_occupation_withdrawal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/iraq_occupation_withdrawal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 U.S. troops killed by rocket, Iraq officials say</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/ml_iraq_58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/ml_iraq_58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/06/06/ml_iraq_58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attack punctuates one of the deadliest days for U.S. troops in the country in two years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iraqi security officials say that a rocket attack has killed five American troops in Iraq.</p><p>Two Iraqi security officials say a barrage of at least three rockets hit an Iraqi base in eastern Baghdad on Monday morning and killed the five American troops.</p><p>Earlier, the U.S. military said in a brief statement that five troops were killed but gave no additional details about where the incident occurred or how they died.</p><p>The Iraqi officials say the Americans were staying on the Iraqi base as advisers and the rockets hit near their living quarters.</p><p>The Iraqi officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>BAGHDAD (AP) -- Five American troops were killed Monday in central Iraq, U.S. officials said -- the single largest loss of life for the American military in Iraq in the past two years.</p><p>The military said in a brief statement that the five were killed Monday, giving no additional details about where the incident occurred or how they died.</p><p>The incident was under investigation and the names of the deceased were being withheld pending notification of the next of kin, the military said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/ml_iraq_58/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/06/ml_iraq_58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five political books that were doomed before they were even published</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Donald Trump on policy" and other ideas that briefly sounded very good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, it was reported that Donald Trump was working on a "policy book," to be <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/12/trump_to_write_policy_book_109836.html">released this summer by the right-wing Regnery Publishing.</a> No surprise there: All candidates and would-be candidates for president release either memoirs or policy books, or both. On May 16, less than a week later, Trump announced that he will not be running for president. Whoops! Now that book is pointless, months before the ghostwriter has finished it.</p><p>Trump's is not the first, and will not be the last political book that was rendered ridiculous or blatantly incorrect before or very shortly after its release. It's not even the only one released this year! Here are some of our favorite sad, wrong books:</p><p><strong>"Where's the Birth Certificate?</strong>" by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299">Jerome Corsi, 2011</a></p><p>Oh, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf">there it is!</a> Sorry, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305844173&amp;sr=8-1">Jerome Corsi</a>, but you couldn't have realized that your entirely pointless search for the "long-form" birth certificate would end nearly a month before your book's publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The seductive power of the U.S. military</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/journalist_war_lovers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/journalist_war_lovers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/16/journalist_war_lovers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do journalists and other civilians have such trouble staying objective when they're embedded with the army?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objective reporting on the SEAL team that killed bin Laden was as easy to find as a Prius at a Michele Bachmann rally. The media simply couldn't help themselves. They couldn't stop spooning out man-sized helpings of testosterone -- the SEALs' <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/navy-seal-team-weapons-gadgets-capture-osama-bin/story?id=13520401">phallic weapons</a>, their <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/05/navy-seal-team-six-excerpt-201105?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all">frat-house</a>, haze-worthy training, their <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/seals-go-from-superhero-to-sex-symbol/2011/05/04/AFCuNgAG_story.html">romance-novel bravado</a>, their sweaty, heaving chests pressing against tight uniforms, muscles daring to break free...</p><p>You get the point. Towel off and read on.</p><p>What is it about the military that turns normally thoughtful journalists into war pornographers? A reporter who would otherwise make it through the day sober spends a little time with some unit of the U.S. military and promptly loses himself in ever more dramatic language about bravery and sacrifice, stolen in equal parts from Thucydides, Henry V, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergeant_Rock">Sergeant Rock</a> comics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/journalist_war_lovers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/journalist_war_lovers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

