<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jack Reacher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/jack_reacher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:20:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Jack Reacher&#8221;: Tom Cruise&#8217;s terrible timing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/jack_reacher_tom_cruises_terrible_timing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/jack_reacher_tom_cruises_terrible_timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Reacher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The star's latest comeback thriller may be poisoned by echoes of Sandy Hook. But don't blame "media violence"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the larger narrative of <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/tom_cruise/">Tom Cruise’s</a> late-career comeback, the new Paramount thriller <a href="http://www.jackreachermovie.com/">“Jack Reacher”</a> had a clear role to play – at least, before it became toxic, thanks to its accidental and superficial similarity to a real-life tragedy. It would be insulting to suggest that Cruise or Christopher McQuarrie, the film’s writer and director, are “victims” in any way, or that the commercial fate of a mainstream entertainment has any meaning in the face of the unbearable grief and tragedy of Sandy Hook. But it’s also useful to remember that Cruise and McQuarrie have done nothing wrong or unusual, beyond what people in Hollywood do all the time, which is to spin out violent and grotesque fantasies for our enjoyment. I think the problem “Jack Reacher” suddenly represents is more about us than about the movie. Confronted with our evident eagerness to consume simulated real-world horror as entertainment, we feel ashamed, at least temporarily.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/jack_reacher_tom_cruises_terrible_timing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/jack_reacher_tom_cruises_terrible_timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
