<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jacobin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/jacobin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Machiavelli doesn&#8217;t belong to the 1 percent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/machiavelli_doesnt_belong_to_the_one_percent_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/machiavelli_doesnt_belong_to_the_one_percent_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machiavelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Discourses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The one percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Prince" is oft-quoted on Wall Street, but its author was a hero of the working class who despised elites]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">I keep a portrait of Machiavelli over my desk at work — an interior design choice that, I have learned, dismays some of my coworkers. Amid a recent mid-afternoon zone out, I received an email from one of them with the title “<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2013/jun/24/who-wants-serve-billionaire-superyachts">Who Wants to Serve a Billionaire?</a>” The message contained a link to an article in the <em>Guardian</em> about a growing group of international multi-billionaires, their so-called “superyachts,” and the desperate lower-class Britons and Eastern Europeans who serve them as deckhands.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/machiavelli_doesnt_belong_to_the_one_percent_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/machiavelli_doesnt_belong_to_the_one_percent_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google is a gay rights advocate now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/pinkwashing_google_and_gop_grovel_for_gay_rights_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/pinkwashing_google_and_gop_grovel_for_gay_rights_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalize Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinkwashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Brand Israel"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george packer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The corporation is embarking on a campaign to end global homophobia in order to build up cultural capital]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a><br /> Tinkerers and technopreneurs are no better suited to solve social and political crises than hacks and bureaucrats, says George Packer in the May issue of the <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/05/27/130527fa_fact_packer?currentPage=all"><em>New Yorker</em></a>. A child of Palo Alto who knows What It Used To Be Like, Packer exposes Silicon Valley exceptionalism for its <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvmNDym6CvQ">bafoonish</a> self-aggrandizement. In one delicious moment, he muses “that the hottest tech start-ups are solving all the problems of being twenty years old, with cash on hand, because that’s who thinks them up.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/pinkwashing_google_and_gop_grovel_for_gay_rights_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/pinkwashing_google_and_gop_grovel_for_gay_rights_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why one million Brazilians are protesting over 20 cents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/how_20_cents_got_a_million_brazilians_to_take_the_streets_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/how_20_cents_got_a_million_brazilians_to_take_the_streets_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazilian Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brazilian public transit has been a source of wealth for elites and government but a financial burden for workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>For more than a week Brazilian workers have taken to the streets. Yesterday, the country witnessed its biggest demonstrations since the fall of the dictatorship. But the situation on the ground has confounded many international commentators.</p><p>Interviewing for <em>Jacobin</em>, Mark Bergfeld sheds light on new developments with Miguel Borba de Sa — a university lecturer at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. He is the author of <em>Bolívia – Passos das revoluções</em> and has written extensively on indigenous struggles in Latin America.</p><p><a href="http://www.mdbergfeld.com/">Mark Bergfeld</a> is a socialist activist in London. He was a leading participant of the UK student movement in 2010.</p><hr /><h4>Mark Bergfeld: How could a twenty-cent increase in bus fares spark protests in more than 100 towns and cities across Brazil?</h4><p>Miguel Borba de Sa: In his book, <em>The Road To Serfdom</em> the Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek wrote that there are two areas that one cannot leave to the competitive principle: transport and the environment. Brazil’s bourgeoisie consistently fails to understand this.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/how_20_cents_got_a_million_brazilians_to_take_the_streets_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/how_20_cents_got_a_million_brazilians_to_take_the_streets_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I was tear-gassed near Taksim Square</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/i_got_tear_gassed_at_taksim_square_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/i_got_tear_gassed_at_taksim_square_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gezi Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recep Tayyip Erdogan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the violence and chaos of the demonstrations, my fellow protestors helped restore my faith in humanity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>My first experience with tear gas took place last Tuesday in a rundown bar off of Istanbul’s İstiklal Street where my friend and I had come after visiting Gezi Park.</p><p>The Turkish prime minister’s hallucinatory depiction of the composition of the anti-government protests had left me half-expecting to find the park populated by oversized Lithuanian lepers on unicorns. My friend and I detected no such “<a href="http://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/192086--istanbul-governor-says-police-will-not-back-down-against-marginal-groups">marginal groups</a>,” however, and the foreign terrorist alcoholic looters alleged to be fueling domestic unrest had apparently succeeded in disguising themselves as civilian non-drunks tranquilly sharing food, conversation, books, and music.</p><p>A few minutes after we had relocated from park to bar, riot police attacked the area with water cannons and tear gas, causing protesters to flee down İstiklal and surrounding arteries. Erdoğan has justified tear gas bombardments as the police’s “<em>en doğal hakkı</em>” or “most natural right.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/i_got_tear_gassed_at_taksim_square_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/i_got_tear_gassed_at_taksim_square_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Argentina&#8217;s radical gay rights movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/america_lags_behind_argentina_in_its_treatment_of_gay_rights_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/america_lags_behind_argentina_in_its_treatment_of_gay_rights_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argentina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It shows what the U.S. could be doing better]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a> At first glance, the gay rights movement in Argentina looks oddly familiar to an American. In the early 1970s, gays and lesbians began forming political organizations, advocating for other queers to come out of the closet, and demanding equal rights and an end to discrimination. Police repression at gay bars in the nation’s largest city lead to further politicization, as did an out lesbian appearing on television. Queers organized pride protests and parades, satellite organizations sprung up in less populated areas, and by 2009 gay marriage became the movement’s biggest issue.</p><p>What happened next might not sound as familiar. Just two years after gay marriage became legal in Argentina, the Law of Gender Equality was passed. Among other things, the law de-pathologizes trans identity, removing transphobic medical clearance requirements to change gender on their legal documents, and increasing access to gender affirming treatments through the public health system. If passing gay marriage in a heavily Catholic country — with the archbishop of Buenos Aires threatening to wage “God’s war” in opposition — seems difficult, then passing one of the world’s most progressive laws for trans rights would seem an impossible accomplishment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/america_lags_behind_argentina_in_its_treatment_of_gay_rights_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/america_lags_behind_argentina_in_its_treatment_of_gay_rights_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Democrats so averse to conflict?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they have any hope of regulating Wall Street or preserving Obamacare, liberals need to get down and dirty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>I’ve never been in a real-deal, legit fight. I’ve seen a few, but I’ve never been in one myself. The ones I was witness to didn’t look particularly enjoyable, though, so it’s not like I look back regretfully on all those times I could’ve punched someone in the head. I long ago learned that I would have to make peace with my pacific nature.</p><p>All of this is to say, I empathize with the urge to duck a fight. They’re ugly things, fights. But despite what you’ve heard, there’s the personal and then there’s the political, and they’re not always one in the same. A conflict-averse person is OK; a conflict-averse politics is not.</p><p>Take Obamacare, for example. With its full implementation inching ever closer to the here and now, there’s a rising chorus of anxiety on the Left, and glee on the right, over what’s looking like a rocky transition. Time will tell, of course, but if these fears prove justified, the Democrats’ recurrent fear of conflict will be in large part to blame.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California judge cites &#8220;Star Trek,&#8221; stuns copyright trolls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sci-fi-lover Otis Wright quoted Spock in his ruling against a group of lawyers laying claim to a single porn video]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a><br /> As someone who made a certain amount of my reputation by using the Star Trek universe to illustrate the <a href="http://www.peterfrase.com/2010/12/anti-star-trek-a-theory-of-posterity/">dangers</a> of strong intellectual property law, I feel obligated to comment on the recent <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/139843902/Prenda-Sanctions-Order">court decision</a> against the entity commonly referred to as Prenda Law. The case combines copyright battles, Star Trek, and pornography — if I can slip in a picture of a cute animal, I may be able to construct the Platonic ideal of a popular Internet post.</p><p>The case, decided in the District Court for the Central District of California, concerns a group of lawyers engaged in a particularly egregious form of copyright trolling. Their strategy was to file a large number of lawsuits accusing individuals of illegally downloading a single porn video, the copyright for which was apparently assigned to one of the lawyers’ groundskeeper on the basis of a forged signature. The basis for these lawsuits was quite flimsy, but the firm had no real intention of winning the lawsuits in court. Instead, they would offer to settle — and as the court decision notes, the offer was “for a sum calculated to be just below the cost of a bare-bones defense.” This, combined with the embarrassment of being publicly linked with downloading porn, was apparently enough to extort money from a significant number of people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/judge_slams_copyright_trollers_with_sanctions_order_star_trek_quotes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Toronto Mayor Rob Ford?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/who_is_toronto_mayor_rob_ford_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/who_is_toronto_mayor_rob_ford_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rob ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before he allegedly smoked crack on camera, Ford was known for being one of Canada's most obnoxious politicians]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>By now many of you have probably heard of the rather incredible story of Rob Ford, the mayor of Toronto, having a relaxed and rather intimate conversation -- and even allegedly appearing to be smoking crack cocaine -- with a couple of drug dealers. In the cell phone video, the mayor is heard to make crude homophobic remarks about the young leader of one of the country’s major political parties and disparaging comments about the ethnicities of the high school kids in the football team he coaches.</p><p>Who is this guy? Is he really doing what people are saying he did? Even in the weird world of bourgeois politics in this neoliberal era, isn’t this sort of thing, well … different?</p><h4>Who is Rob Ford?</h4><p>Rob Ford is the right-wing populist mayor of Toronto, the fourth largest city in North America. With almost three million people, it’s also one of the most culturally diverse urban spaces in the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/who_is_toronto_mayor_rob_ford_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/who_is_toronto_mayor_rob_ford_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doug Henwood: Capitalism thrives on class exploitation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/doug_henwood_on_the_decline_of_the_left_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/doug_henwood_on_the_decline_of_the_left_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doug henwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The publisher of "Left Business Observer" talks print media, left regroupment and electoral politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>I recently stumbled on an old interview with Doug Henwood (my first) that I conducted when I was in college. Then as he does now, Henwood produces an irreplaceable newsletter, <a href="http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/">Left Business Observer</a> and is the host of <a href="http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Radio.html">Behind the News</a>, a syndicated weekly radio program. This interview originally appeared on The Activist blog and was conducted in early 2010.</p><p>It’s a bit disjointed, but we discuss the future of <a href="http://www.printmag.com/article/image-of-the-day-december-28-2012/">print publishing</a>, <a href="http://jacobinmag.com/2013/04/fellow-travelers/">left regroupment</a>, <a href="http://jacobinmag.com/2012/11/beyond-november/">electoral politics</a>, among other topics. Damn, look at all that foreshadowing.</p><hr /><h4>Bhaskar Sunkara: What’s going on with New York’s home for 9/11 conspiracy theories and alternative medicine [and thankfully Behind the News with Doug Henwood], <a href="http://www.wbai.org/">WBAI</a>?</h4><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/doug_henwood_on_the_decline_of_the_left_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/doug_henwood_on_the_decline_of_the_left_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Spring Breakers&#8221; vs. &#8220;The Great Gatsby&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/is_spring_breakers_the_new_great_gatsby_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/is_spring_breakers_the_new_great_gatsby_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Gatsby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F. Scott Fitzgerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmony Korine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baz luhrman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harmony Korine's latest hews closer to the themes of Fitzgerald's novel than Baz Luhrmann's glitzy adaptation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>Dubstep, the social glue responsible for connecting an entire subculture of kids whose common interest is often just partying, has provided a unifying thread an unlikely place: it’s on the soundtracks to both Baz Luhrmann’s adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s <em>The Great Gatsby</em> and Harmony Korine’s recent <em>Spring Breakers</em>. Though the connection may seem at first superficial — Luhrmann’s, after all, resurrects the classic 1920s tale of a self-made man in vain pursuit of past glory, while Korine’s follows four young girls on a spring break bender that turns violent — they actually raise similar questions of the American Dream.</p><p>Or, at least, one of them does: Luhrmann’s indulgent, over-the-top adaptation misreads Fitzgerald’s novel, whereas Korine’s self-aware, sexed-up critique of a generation is, while unrelated plot-wise, a more faithful extension of the spirit of Gatsby.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/is_spring_breakers_the_new_great_gatsby_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/is_spring_breakers_the_new_great_gatsby_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enough with the hipster-bashing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/enough_with_the_hipster_bashing_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/enough_with_the_hipster_bashing_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hipsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williamsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Alford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The censure has become a stand-in for anti-intellectualism, middle class resentment and subtle homophobia ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a> “It’s the Hotel Altamont,” according to a <em>New York Post</em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/bikers_make_life_hells_Vl8PQ8DuTBRuUMckioqcPP" target="_blank"> article</a> detailing one Bushwick landlord’s efforts to evict his tenants. Forward thinking rentier Andy Chau apparently hired the Forbidden Ones Motorcycle Club to “terrorize the residents” of two buildings on Thames Street in Bushwick — a well-known “hipster” enclave — who are living in illegally converted industrial spaces under the protection of the 1982 New York City loft law.</p><p>Two gang members assaulted the woman who was later evicted by Chau in order to make way for the Forbidden Ones and their biker parties. Although the building once housed an Occupy Wall Street film collective who documented the Zuccotti Park evictions, the Post’s two writers reassure their readership that all of this is simply the latest chapter in the place’s “colorful history.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/enough_with_the_hipster_bashing_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/enough_with_the_hipster_bashing_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>162</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White collar workers are exploited too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/joan_rivers_e_fashion_police_staff_on_strike_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/joan_rivers_e_fashion_police_staff_on_strike_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e! network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Rivers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The E! "Fashion Police" writers strike highlights the need for unionization on all levels of labor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>Nothing scrambles the conventional wisdom on contemporary class politics in the US like a white-collar strike. In our neoliberal era, we’re told that unions might have once been appropriate for the soot-faced and burly proletarians of the 1930s. But since most of those workers have long since disappeared, labor unions — the logic follows — are also no longer necessary.</p><p>But not all skilled (and deeply exploited) laborers go to work with a hardhat and a lunch pail. And just like their union brothers and sisters in warehouses and factory floors across the country, the struggle for real union representation is every bit as radicalizing.</p><p>Eliza Skinner has spent the past year writing jokes for the E! television show Fashion Police. Skinner pens about 200 jokes per episode (almost a full work week’s as far as ‘hours worked’), pitching them at a weekly meeting with the host, Joan Rivers, and the show’s producers. For this, she is paid roughly $500 a week.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/joan_rivers_e_fashion_police_staff_on_strike_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/joan_rivers_e_fashion_police_staff_on_strike_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass murder vs. terrorism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When did the definitions of these terms come to hinge on the perpetrator's weapon of choice?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>For critics of American foreign policy, it’s all but axiomatic that the designation of a violent act as “terrorism” says as much about the accuser as it does about the accused. The U.S. government itself <a href="http://publicintelligence.net/the-continually-expanding-definition-of-terrorism/">can’t decide</a> on a single working definition of the term, but a <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/0.85">standard one</a> denotes unlawful politically-motivated violence designed to intimidate a government or civilian population. Put pressure on any part of this definition and it starts to buckle.<ins cite="mailto:bhaskar" datetime="2013-04-25T20:32"></ins></p><p>“Unlawful”? Why can’t terrorists — as per the word’s original <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_terrorism">meaning</a> — be state actors? “Civilian population”? The category becomes meaningless if individuals can be retroactively <a href="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/05/29/analysis-how-obama-changed-definition-of-civilian-in-secret-drone-wars/">subtracted</a> from it for the crime of being struck by an American drone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/is_dzohkhar_tsarnaev_a_suspected_murderer_or_terrorist_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austerity opposition goes mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad data, dodgy assumptions and a basic inability to use Microsoft Excel may have doomed the economic movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>Austerity is collecting a lot of high-flying enemies these days. In the past month the <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6c023bdc-a93c-11e2-a096-00144feabdc0.html">manager of PIMCO</a>, the largest bond-buying firm in the world, top figures <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/the-a-list/2013/04/03/europe-needs-to-focus-more-on-reform-not-just-austerity/#axzz2RPkoZRrD">at Blackrock</a>, one of the most influential investment banks in the world, the President of the European Commission, <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/73f2aafe-ab65-11e2-ac71-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2RO82qRgs">Jose Manuel Barroso</a>, and <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/60b7a4ec-ab58-11e2-8c63-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2RO82qRgs">Martin Wolf</a>, world-renowned finance commentator for the <em>Financial Times</em>, have all come out vigorously against austerity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We have always been rentiers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/we_have_always_been_rentiers_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/we_have_always_been_rentiers_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Towards a new economic model]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>In my periodic discussions of contemporary capitalism and its potential transition into a rentier-dominated economy, I have emphasized the point that an economy based on private property depends upon the state to define and enforce just what counts as property, and what rights come with owning that property. (The point is perhaps made most directly in this essay for the New Inquiry.) Just as capitalism required that the commons in land be enclosed and transformed into the property of individuals, so what I’ve called “rentism” requires the extension of intellectual property: the right to control the copying and modification of patterns, and not just of physical objects.</p><p>But the development of rentism entails not just a change in the laws, but in the way the economy itself is measured and defined. Since capitalism is rooted in the quantitative reduction of human action to the accumulation of money, the way in which it quantifies itself has great economic and political significance. To relate this back to my last post: much was made of the empirical and conceptual worthiness of Reinhart and Rogoff’s link between government debt and economic growth, but all such disputations presume agreement about the measurement of economic growth itself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/we_have_always_been_rentiers_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/we_have_always_been_rentiers_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When wonks burn politicians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reinhartt-Rogoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Konczal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reinhart-Rogoff study should serve as a cautionary tale for pols relying on spreadsheets to dictate policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a> The economics blogosphere is buzzing about the errors that were recently exposed in an <a href="http://qz.com/75117/how-influential-was-the-study-warning-high-debt-kills-growth/">influential</a> paper by Carmen Reinhart, Vincent Reinhart, and Kenneth Rogoff, which claimed that countries with high levels of debt tend to have slower economic growth. See <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems">Mike Konczal</a> for the summary or <a href="http://www.peri.umass.edu/236/hash/31e2ff374b6377b2ddec04deaa6388b1/publication/566/">here</a> for the full paper by Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, and Robert Pollin.</p><p>In short, the original Reinhart-Rogoff paper had three significant problems, ranging from cherry-picking data, to dubious weighting schemes, to —most embarrassing of all — an Excel spreadsheet error that accidentally left out several crucial data points.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should liberals feel nostalgia for the old-school left?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Hobsbawm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irving howe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A closer look at the works of historians like Eric Hobsbawm suggests this sentimentalism may be misplaced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The tradition of all the dead generations,” <a href="http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/ch01.htm">Marx wrote</a> 150 years ago, “weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.” Today, with our politics trapped in capitalism’s endless fugue state, the nightmare that troubled Marx may seem to contemporary left-wingers like a pleasant dream of days gone by.<br /> <a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>At least the dead generations took Marx seriously. At least they had a powerful labor movement and center-left parties that believed in the welfare state. And at least Ralph Miliband, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-wDxoxn4Yo">the dead leftist</a> whose son is the living leader of Britain’s Labour Party, would never have answered a question about capitalism with a grudging obeisance to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/9544522/Ed-Miliband-interview-I-want-to-save-the-capitalism-my-father-hated.html">the creative power of BlackBerry</a>.</p><p>It’s easy to get nostalgic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/should_we_feel_nostalgia_for_the_old_school_left_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart is no Bassem Youssef</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_bassam_youssef_is_not_the_egyptian_jon_stewart_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_bassam_youssef_is_not_the_egyptian_jon_stewart_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bassam youssef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike the "Daily Show" host, the Egyptian comedian actually challenges the political status quo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">Two weeks ago Egypt’s public prosecutor ordered the arrest of comedian Bassem Youssef, host of the TV show<em> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Bernameg">Al-Bernameg</a></em>, for “insulting Islam” and Egypt’s President Mohammad Morsi. Youssef’s name is rarely mentioned without reference to his admitted role model, the American comedian Jon Stewart, who recently defended Youssef on <em>The Daily Show</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">Since Youssef’s arrest, nearly <a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/02/egypt-and-u-s-argue-over-jon-stewart-americas-bassem-youssef/">every story</a> about the incident labels the heart-surgeon-turned-TV-star as “Egypt’s Jon Stewart.” But Youssef — who continues to risk his freedom and career to ridicule Egypt’s political elite — has little in common with Stewart, a man who’s built a comedy empire on an unwarranted reputation for prophetic humor and moral integrity. And even while Youssef himself cites Stewart as an influence, the Egyptian humorist far outshines his American counterpart in his willingness to challenge political and social taboos.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_bassam_youssef_is_not_the_egyptian_jon_stewart_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_bassam_youssef_is_not_the_egyptian_jon_stewart_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When capitalism consumed the Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/when_did_the_internet_become_a_for_profit_venture_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/when_did_the_internet_become_a_for_profit_venture_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Web today is a far cry from the utopian digital playground envisioned by its early users and pioneers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Let’s grab all this new technology in our teeth once again and turn it into a bonanza for advertising.” These are the words of former Procter &amp; Gamble CEO Edwin Artzt. Renowned for his business acumen, Artzt, always one to turn a profit, told his fellow captains of industry to aim their attention to something new, something unseen before, something that needed to be conquered.<br /> <a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a></p><p>The early Internet was certainly a different place. It seemed a time of unlimited potential, when the old barriers to communication and information were said to melt away like so much butter in the microwave. People would be linked in ways never seen before, all in a purely public and noncommercial space. Early analysts claimed that the old media conglomerates were going to be swept aside by a coming Digital Age. For those looking to the future, the Internet would be <em>the</em> democratic space since its underlying principle, the networked sharing of data, was inherently leveling, free, and transparent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/when_did_the_internet_become_a_for_profit_venture_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/when_did_the_internet_become_a_for_profit_venture_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame austerity economics, not gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/blame_austerity_economics_not_gay_marriage_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/blame_austerity_economics_not_gay_marriage_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drudge report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samuel Alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Census]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives lamenting the collapse of the traditional American household have only their fiscal policies to blame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>  A curious thing happened in the Beltway last week: for the 48 hours surrounding two landmark gay marriage Supreme Court oral arguments, the millennial political class’ collective Facebook feed <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/03/facebook-27-million-people-showed-their-support-for-marriage-equality-by-changing-their-profile-pictures/274497/">blushed bright red</a>. Obama-handshake profile pictures gave way to a sharp crimson square designed by the Human Rights Campaign’s marketing department.</p><p>Between torrents of memes and legal commentary on Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s skim milk analogy, Samuel Alito’s rusting Burkeanism, and Elena Kagan’s “<a href="http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/genderandsexualitylawblog/files/2010/05/Kagan-playing-softball1.jpg">batting average</a>,” another item, a report about adults <a href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/03/26/seen-at-11-groups-of-adults-turn-to-cooperative-households-to-save-money/">turning to cooperative households</a> to save money, passed without remark in liberal circles.<strong>        </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/blame_austerity_economics_not_gay_marriage_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/blame_austerity_economics_not_gay_marriage_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>