<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Economy added 155,000 jobs in December</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The figure met analyst expectations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- U.S. employers added 155,000 jobs in December, a steady gain that shows hiring held up during tense fiscal cliff negotiations in Washington.</p><p>The Labor Department says the unemployment rate stayed at 7.8 percent last month. November's rate was revised higher from an initially reported 7.7 percent.</p><p>Robust hiring in manufacturing and construction fueled the gains. Construction added 30,000 jobs, the most in 15 months. That likely reflects additional hiring needed to rebuild after Superstorm Sandy and also solid gains in home building that have contributed to a housing recovery.</p><p>Manufacturing gained 25,000, the most in nine months.</p><p>Even with the gains, hiring is far from accelerating. Employers added an average of 153,000 jobs a month last year, matching the monthly average in 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/economy_added_155000_jobs_in_december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ADP report shows gain of 215,000 jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The report beat analysts expectations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. economy added 215,000 private sector jobs in December, according to the monthly report from payroll processor ADP. The gains easily beat analyst expectations for a bump of <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/december-adp-jobs-report-2013-1">140,000 jobs</a>.</p><p>The ADP report is seen as a preview of tomorrow's number from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.</p><p>Sectorwise, jobs in "financial activities" climbed by 14,000 and construction jobs jumped by 39,000, potentially a sign that the housing market is recovering.</p><p>On the downside, 187,000 of the new jobs were in the service sector while only 28,000 were what ADP categorizes as "goods producing." Manufacturing positions fell by 11,000. This is relevant because, in very general terms, manufacturing jobs tend to pay better than those in the service sector.</p><p>Medium-sized businesses accounted for 102,000 jobs with large companies adding 87,000 and small businesses adding 25,000.</p><p>This is a strong improvement over November's ADP report which showed an increase of 148,000 jobs revised up from 118,000.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/adp_jobs_report_show_gain_of_215000_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CEO who says tax cuts don&#8217;t create jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_ceo_who_says_tax_cuts_dont_create_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_ceo_who_says_tax_cuts_dont_create_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PayPal's former CEO tells Salon tax rates are "not a driving factor" in job creation, despite the GOP's rhetoric]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you listen to Republicans, you get the impression that raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans or on capital gains will kill tens of thousands of jobs and tank the economy. "200,000 jobs <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/2029083490001/rubio-taxes-are-already-going-up-because-health-care-law">are going to be destroyed</a> ... this kills the middle-class jobs that are created by those small businesses," Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio told Fox News yesterday about President Obama's proposed tax hikes.</p><p>But at least one of those job creators says that's bunk. Bill Harris, the former CEO of PayPal and Intuit (the giant software company whose main clients are small business), and the current CEO of <a href="https://www.personalcapital.com/">Personal Capital</a>, recently wrote a column in Forbes headlined "<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/billharris/2012/11/05/tax-cuts-dont-create-jobs/">Tax Cuts Don't Create Jobs</a>." We spoke with him to find out more and he told us marginal tax rates simply aren't the driving concern for companies when they're thinking about creating jobs.</p><p><strong>Why do you say tax cuts don’t create jobs?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_ceo_who_says_tax_cuts_dont_create_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_ceo_who_says_tax_cuts_dont_create_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs truthers&#8217; latest myth: Government doing all the hiring</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative news sites say that 73 percent of new jobs are created by the government. That number is pure garbage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard the news? While us workaday job-creating CEOs are about to get hit by Obama’s tax hike on the wealthiest 2 percent, those fat-cat municipal sanitation workers and public schoolteachers are adding to their ranks at an alarming rate. According to the latest meme ricocheting around the conservative blogosphere and Fox News, almost three-quarters of the new jobs created in the past five months have been government jobs.</p><p>The figure, <a href="http://cnsnews.com/news/article/73-new-jobs-created-last-5-months-are-government">first reported Friday</a> by the social conservative news website CNS.com, has immediatly gained traction on the right. It hits all the right buttons of demonstrating out-of-control government spending while exposing the sham that is the supposedly improving economy. And it does it all in a nifty little eye-popping statistic: First there was the 1 percent, then the 53 percent, followed by the 47 percent, now we have the 73 percent. The one problem is that it's total baloney, but we'll get to that in a second.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/jobs_truthers_latest_myth_government_doing_all_the_hiring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US adds 146,000 jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Labor Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandy threw off predictions, but a better-than-expected employment report also saw jobless rate fall]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economists were way off the mark with their predictions for today's jobs report. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/08/business/economy/us-creates-146000-new-jobs-as-unemployment-rate-falls-to-7-7.html">first report </a>since President Obama's reelection saw the economy adding 146,000 jobs and the unemployment rate falling to 7.7 percent -- trumping predictions that only 86,000 jobs would be added.</p><p>Tepid forecasts were partly tied to Hurricane Sandy, which economists believed would hamper job growth -- and indeed, November's numbers were somewhat lower than in previous months' job reports. In August, September and October an average of 170,000 were added each month. Meanwhile, November's jobless rate was the lowest since December 2008, despite <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/gallup-the-unemployment-rate-surged-in-november-2012-12">Gallup predictions </a>of an unemployment surge. The pollster put unemployment in November at 8.3 percent (compared to the government's 7.7 percent).</p><p>Manufacturing jobs fell by 7,000 and as our own Andrew Leonard <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/">noted Friday,</a> despite a media frenzy, the decision by Apple to manufacture one line of Macs in the U.S., alongside other "insourcing" efforts by U.S. corporations, does not mark a glorious  renaissance in U.S. manufacturing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/us_added_146000_jobs_last_month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing the Apple jobs back home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reverse globalization is suddenly in the headlines. Here's why American workers shouldn't be jumping for joy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Cook may not be Steve Jobs, but the new Apple CEO proved this week that he is just as good as the old Apple CEO at getting the media to snap to attention. One carefully calibrated bomb dropped toward the end of a humongous Bloomberg BusinessWeek interview -- that <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-12-06/tim-cooks-freshman-year-the-apple-ceo-speaks#p9">Apple plans to spend $100 million</a> to bring some Mac manufacturing back to the United States in 2013 -- rocketed around the world, from Twitter to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/technology/apple-to-resume-us-manufacturing.html?hp ">New York Times,</a> in less time than it takes to run down the battery on your iPhone. Who needs Steve Jobs? Real <em>jobs</em> are coming back to America!</p><p>The timing was perfect for a growing cohort of economy-watchers eager to make the argument that globalization's malign impact on the American worker has hit high tide and is finally beginning to ebb. Just a week ago, the Atlantic presciently published <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/12/the-insourcing-boom/309166/">"The Insourcing Boom,"</a> a fascinating in-depth story by Charles Fishman investigating General Electric's decision to start up new appliance assembly lines in the U.S. And "GE is not alone," writes Fishman,  arguing that an increasing number of American corporations are discovering it makes economic sense to bring the factories back home. Apple's news was the exclamation point at the end of the Atlantic's sentence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A judge searches for free labor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judicial clerkship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brand-new (and possibly illegal) low: U.S. judge wants a clerk who will "morally commit" for a year -- without pay]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a story of what’s happening to the best and the brightest of the echo boomer generation -- the children of the baby boomers, many of whom, to echo Bob Dylan, have finished 20 years of schooling, only to find they can’t get put on the day shift.</p><p>Traditionally, the most prestigious job a law school graduate can get straight out of school is a federal judicial clerkship. Holders of these one-year positions are usually much sought-after by big law firms and other desirable employers, and the competition among law students for federal clerkships is ferocious.</p><p>Even at elite law schools, only students at or near the top of class have a reasonable shot at a federal clerkship. In addition, now many young lawyers with sterling resumes have begun applying for clerkships. The result is that any federal judge will be deluged with hundreds of highly qualified candidates for an open position.</p><p>In response, the government has created an online application site for judicial clerks, featuring strict rules about when candidates can apply and when clerkship offers can be made. William Martinez, a federal judge in Denver, is currently using the site to solicit applications for a standard year-long clerkship in his chambers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exit poll: Many still blame Bush for bad economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joblessness and high prices are among top voter worries]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Rising prices and chronic unemployment were heavy on the minds of voters Tuesday even as a glimmer of optimism peeked through. Four in 10 said the nation's battered economy is getting better.</p><p>Most everyone agreed there's still far to go. They were less likely to blame President Barack Obama for the economic troubles, however, than to point the finger at his predecessor, George W. Bush, according to preliminary results of a national exit poll.</p><p>Only a fourth thought they were better off financially than four years ago when Obama was elected in the midst of the worst economic collapse since the Great Depression. Voters were most likely to say their families were doing about the same, and Obama led among that group.</p><p>A third felt worse off, and they were voting heavily for Romney.</p><p>The survey of voters as they left polling places showed 6 in 10 ranked the economy the top issue, way ahead of health care, the federal budget deficit or foreign policy. The majority who don't yet see economic improvement were roughly divided over whether things were getting even worse or just stuck in place.</p><p>About 4 in 10 blamed Obama for the nation's economic woes, and almost all of them voted for Republican challenger Mitt Romney.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/exit_poll_many_still_blame_bush_for_bad_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want a strong economy? Vote Democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/want_a_strong_economy_vote_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/want_a_strong_economy_vote_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think jobs, prosperity and income growth over the long term are important, your choice is easy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The economy is a key issue in this year’s presidential campaign. Is America better off now than when Barack Obama took office? Presumably the answer matters because it sheds some light on how things will go over the <em>next</em> four years if Obama is reelected. But how much light?</p><p>As one successful investment manager <a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2009/1130/finance-carnival-ariel-basketball-patient-investor.html]">says</a>, “Luck matters in the short term, but skill matters in the long term.” <em></em>The implication is that Americans looking for skillful economic leadership from the White House would be better served by considering the <em>long-term</em> economic performance of Democratic and Republican presidents rather than the vagaries of the past four years.</p><p>Even the simple-seeming question of whether America is better off now than when President Obama took office hides important complexities. Our economy survived what <em>could</em> have been another Great Depression and is now growing, albeit slowly. GDP and the stock market are up; but unemployment remains painfully high, and most people’s real incomes are lower than they were four years ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/want_a_strong_economy_vote_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/want_a_strong_economy_vote_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans are going back to work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Romney will have to look elsewhere for a last minute campaign boost. The economy added 171,000 jobs in October]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's all smiles in Chicago, and frowny faces in Boston.</p><p>If Mitt Romney was holding out hope that one last downbeat unemployment report would give his campaign some juice heading into the final weekend of the 2012 campaign, he is sure to be disappointed. The Bureau of Labor Statistics <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm ">reported on Friday morning</a> that the economy added 171,000 jobs in October, almost 50,000 more than had been expected by economists. The unemployment ticked up one meaningless notch, from 7.8 to 7.9 percent.</p><p>Indeed, this is a case where the rise in the unemployment rate is actually an encouraging sign. Total employment in the U.S., according to the BLS's household survey, rose by a very healthy 410,000, but the overall civilian labor force -- defined as the set of all Americans who have jobs or <em>are looking for jobs</em> -- surged by 578,000. The labor force participation rate, accordingly, rose to 63.8 percent. What that means is that Americans who had previously given up on the labor market are now actively looking for jobs again. The unemployment rate rose, paradoxically, because the job market is more encouraging.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/americans_are_going_back_to_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four years ago, the economy really sucked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobless claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did things look the week before Americans voted in 2008? Really, really bad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday was a big day for economic indicators, with new numbers on jobless claims, private sector job creation, automobile sales and manufacturing sector growth. Together, the reports deliver the last big dump of data before next Tuesday's election.</p><p>So let's have some fun with that old chestnut: Are you better off now than you were four years ago?</p><p><strong>Auto sales</strong></p><p>Four years ago, the automobile market <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/11/03/news/companies/auto_sales/index.htm ">collapsed to its lowest point in 25 years.</a> Sales in October 2008 declined by 32 percent over a year earlier, projecting to an annual rate of 10.6 million.</p><p>October 2012's sales won't be quite as robust as September's, mostly due to a big hit at the end of the month from Hurricane Sandy, but all the major car companies except Nissan registered year-on-year growth, and the annual rate is <a href=" http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/11/us-light-vehicle-sales-at-143-million.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CalculatedRisk+%28Calculated+Risk%29">projected to 14.3 million.</a></p><p><strong>Jobless claims</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/four_years_ago_the_economy_really_sucked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big surprise in the ADP jobs report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP jobs report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wingers expected a low number because of a change in how it counts jobs. They didn't get what they wanted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tale of two surprises: One little, one big.</p><p>The payroll processing company ADP reported that private sector employers <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/adp-jobs-report-2012-11">added 158,000 jobs in October.</a> That's the little surprise: The consensus estimate of economists was that ADP would report around 125,000 new jobs. That's not a great number, but it is in line with what we've been seeing in recent months: confirmation of a slow recovery in the labor market.</p><p>But here's the tricky part. On Wednesday, ADP announced that it was <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2012/10/updates-to-adp-employment-report.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CalculatedRisk+%28Calculated+Risk%29">rejiggering its methodology</a> for counting jobs. This was long overdue -- ADP's goal, every month, is to come up with a number that ends up close to what the government reports  on the first Friday of every new month. But in the past, ADP's numbers have been a terrible guide to what the BLS reports -- often coming in much higher, or far lower.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/the_big_surprise_in_the_adp_jobs_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor Department is not hiding behind the hurricane</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/labor_department_is_not_hiding_behind_the_hurricane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/labor_department_is_not_hiding_behind_the_hurricane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing claims of a purposeful delay on the jobs report were somewhat undermined by good ADP numbers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have been a clever trick by that dastardly Labor Department: use a devastating, coast-altering hurricane to purposefully delay the release of a jobs report so damning it would turn the election for the GOP if released on time this week.</p><p>At least this was the <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/department-labor/2012/10/29/outrageous-labor-department-may-delay-jobs-report">insinuation of </a>Fox Nation when they called a possible delay in the October jobs report release "outrageous." Drudge too suggested the delay would be a "mystery," despite the fact that Frankenstorm unmysteriously shuttered D.C. federal offices (where jobs reports are created) for the first part of this week. The Daily Caller <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/29/axelrod-downplays-political-impact-of-pending-jobs-report/">noted</a> that "any delay would postpone the release until Monday, likely muting the impact of bad numbers."</p><p>Right-wing pundits might put this particular conspiracy theory to bed if today's October jobs report from payroll processor ADP is an indicator of the government's figures. If we go by ADP's numbers, we can expect a jobs report not too damning at all. "Private employers added 158,000 jobs in the month, ADP said, beating economists' forecasts of 143,000," CNN reported Thursday, noting, "Meanwhile, the number of people filing for initial jobless claims fell 9,000 to 363,000 in the latest week, the U.S. government said."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/labor_department_is_not_hiding_behind_the_hurricane/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/labor_department_is_not_hiding_behind_the_hurricane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gardening tips for small business job creation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/gardening_tips_for_small_business_job_creation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/gardening_tips_for_small_business_job_creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama and Romney say they want to help entrepreneurs flourish. But will they offer more than just another tax cut?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've heard it all year long, and in every presidential debate: <em>small businesses</em> deserve special handling from the government because <em>small businesses</em> create all the jobs. Even in a debate ostensibly devoted to foreign policy, Romney and Obama were at it again, tussling over who loved small business more.</p><p>Funny thing about small businesses. Not only are they responsible for creating lots and lots of jobs, but they're also responsible for the <em>loss</em> of lots and lots of jobs.</p><p>That insight comes courtesy of Inc. Magazine's Bo Burlingham, in the intriguing article <a href="http://www.inc.com/magazine/201209/bo-burlingham/who-really-creates-the-jobs.html">"Who Really Creates the Jobs?"</a> Burlingham's investigation should be required reading for every pundit who wants to wax eloquent about the government role in spurring small business job creation, because it makes a convincing case that both Republicans and Democrats are going about things all wrong -- at least at the federal level.</p><p>"If you were to group together the vast majority of small companies," writes Burlingham, "their <em>net</em> job generation would add up to zero."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/gardening_tips_for_small_business_job_creation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/gardening_tips_for_small_business_job_creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s iffy employment figures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/as_economy_improves_romneys_stats_dont/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/as_economy_improves_romneys_stats_dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The truth behind Romney's claim that 23 million Americans are out of work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the recent focus on Libya, this election will come down to the economy; as Steve Kornacki <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/obama_is_still_winning/">noted this morning</a>, voters consistently tell pollsters it's their top concern. As the incumbent, Obama was always going to be at a disadvantage here, but fortunately for him the economy has shown real signs of improvement, and he’s <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/obama-discovers-morning-in-america">changed his message</a> in the past few days to reflect that. Now he talks about how many jobs he’s created and how much the stock market and home values have risen, instead of defensively listing what still needs to be done.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/as_economy_improves_romneys_stats_dont/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/as_economy_improves_romneys_stats_dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Infamous Reddit troll loses job after Gawker expose</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/infamous_reddit_troll_loses_job_after_gawker_expose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/infamous_reddit_troll_loses_job_after_gawker_expose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violentacres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael brutsch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The online community is reeling after the public outing of one of its own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than a day after Gawker's Adrian Chen <a href="http://gawker.com/5950981/unmasking-reddits-violentacrez-the-biggest-troll-on-the-web?tag=the-internet">outed Violentacrez</a>, Reddit's most infamous user and inciter (referred to as a "troll" in Internet-speak) has realized his worst fear: getting found out and then fired in real life.</p><p>Of Violentacrez, Chen writes:</p><blockquote><p>If you are capable of being offended, Brutsch has almost certainly done something that would offend you, then did his best to rub your face in it. His speciality is distributing images of scantily-clad underage girls, but as Violentacrez he also issued an unending fountain of racism, porn, gore, misogyny, incest, and exotic abominations yet unnamed, all on the sprawling online community Reddit. At the time I called Brutsch, his latest project was moderating a new section of Reddit where users posted covert photos they had taken of women in public, usually close-ups of their asses or breasts, for a voyeuristic sexual thrill. It was called "Creepshots."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/infamous_reddit_troll_loses_job_after_gawker_expose/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/infamous_reddit_troll_loses_job_after_gawker_expose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>191</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An economist debunks the job truthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/an_economist_debunks_the_job_truthers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/an_economist_debunks_the_job_truthers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs truthers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nerds don't lie. If there were a problem with the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we'd know]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call it the October jobs surprise! With five weeks to go before a presidential election, the government's report of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_stunner/">a sharp drop in the unemployment rate</a> sparked instant suspicion from Republicans. My Salon colleague Alex Seitz-Wald documented the backlash this morning in his post <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_truthers_return/">"Jobs Report Truthers Return."</a> The bottom line: Conservatives are claiming that political pressure from Obama must have pushed the Bureau of Labor Statistics to fudge the numbers. None other than former General Electric CEO Jack Welch immediately <a href="https://twitter.com/jack_welch/status/254198154260525057">tweeted:</a>" "Unbelievable jobs numbers … these Chicago guys will do anything … can't debate so change numbers."</p><p>Do they have a case? Justin Wolfers, <a href="http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/jwolfers/index.shtml">an up-and-coming economist</a> about to begin <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/Much-Watched-Couple-in/133195/">a prestigious stint at the University of Michigan,</a> emphatically says no. He explained why to Salon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/an_economist_debunks_the_job_truthers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/an_economist_debunks_the_job_truthers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs report truthers return</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_truthers_return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_truthers_return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any time the Labor Department produces positive jobs numbers, conservatives smell conspiracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_stunner/">Today’s jobs report</a>, showing the unemployment rate dropped below 8 percent for the first time in over 40 moths, will have Democrats gleeful and Republicans (deep in their hearts) despondent. But what if the numbers are actually just a part of a plot to get President Obama reelected? It’s a stupid question, but the immediate reaction of many conservative media figures has been not only to ask it, but to answer it as well.</p><p>On Fox News, which completely ignored the numbers for the first 30 minutes they were out in favor of stories about (what else?) gold and a live performance by 12-year-old Jackie Evancho, host Bill Hemer darkly warned, as he summarized the report, “a lot of questions remain about those numbers.” Co-host Martha MacCallum agreed that the report “raises a  lot questions.” Finally, they brought on Fox Business analyst Stuart Varney to give it to us straight: “There is widespread mistrust of this report and these numbers, because there are clear contradictions.” Varney explained that many of the jobs created are part-time, and that there were discrepancies between the two surveys that make up the report (one looks at jobs added and the other calculates the unemployment rate).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_truthers_return/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_truthers_return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs report stunner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_stunner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_stunner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unemployment rate falls to 7.8 percent. Americans are going back to work ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a remarkable development sure to give the debate-debacle battered Obama campaign a big morale boost, the government reported that the unemployment rate fell to 7.8 percent in September -- <em>its lowest mark since January 2009.</em> The government also reported that the economy added 114,000 jobs, and revised the jobs numbers for July and August upward.</p><p>The 114,000 number nailed the pre-report economist consensus, and normally would not be considered enough to justify such a sharp drop in the unemployment rate. In some quarters, the news was immediately greeted with suspicion. Former GE CEO Jack Welch, for example, immediately <a href="https://twitter.com/jack_welch/status/254198154260525057">tweeted</a>: "Unbelievable jobs numbers ... these Chicago guys will do anything ... can't debate so change numbers."</p><p>But the mystery clears up when you look closer. The monthly government labor report is actually based on two separate surveys: the household survey, which generates the unemployment rate, and the establishment survey, which generates the gross jobs totals. In the past few years, sharp drops in the unemployment rate have often been explained by  household survey numbers reporting that Americans have simply given up looking for jobs, thus shrinking the overall size of the labor force. That's generally not a sign of a healthy economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_stunner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/jobs_report_stunner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Art doesn&#8217;t pay</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The creative class, of which I am a proud and bewildered member, appears to be going bankrupt. Is all hope lost?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking out at the mountains, thinking: Trees are so lucky, they don’t have to have jobs. Of course, as any elementary schoolteacher will tell you, trees <em>do</em> have an important job, which is to expel nice fresh oxygen into the air so we can all breathe, to provide a habitat for lots of necessary creatures, and so on. But they don’t have to have <em>job</em> jobs, where you show up at an office every day, or compulsively check your work email from home, or wait nervously for checks to arrive in the mail in hopes that your propane gas won’t get turned off. Trees don’t have to worry about things like that, and I envy them.</p><p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/TheWeeklings-1.jpg" alt="The Weeklings" align="left" /></a>“Old. Tired. Sick. Alone. Broke.” This sad litany comes from an idiosyncratic novel by David Markson called <em>The Last Novel,</em> in which he tells the story, in fragmentary anecdotes, of an aging author writing his final book. The novel references hundreds of other writers and artists of various kinds, many of whom went unrecognized during their lives.  Old. Tired. Sick. Alone. Broke. I can’t stand the thought of anyone ending up that way.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/its_never_been_worse_to_be_an_artist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>