<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Joe Conason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/joe_conason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 13:20:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Justice Department vs. Joe Conason</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/22/mckinnon_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/22/mckinnon_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//misc/2007/05/22/mckinnon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Mark McKinnon helped the White House fight the Salon columnist's charges against Alberto Gonzales.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the Justice Department documents dumped last night depict frantic efforts by administration underlings to wildly spin the firing of eight U.S. attorneys after aggressive reporters began poking holes in the explanation that they were let go for "performance" reasons. I particularly enjoyed <a href="http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/OAG1596-1645.pdf">a sequence</a> in which the infamous Bush strategist Mark McKinnon asks for help combating Joe Conason's <a href="/opinion/conason/2007/02/09/united_states_attorneys/">Feb. 9 Salon column</a> about the attorney purge, "Alberto Gonzales' Coup d'&eacute;tat." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/22/mckinnon_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/22/mckinnon_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Year of the Liar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/22/liar_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/22/liar_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survivor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2003/12/22/liar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From weapons of mass destruction to Jayson Blair, we trusted them -- and they punk'd us. Why do we keep coming back for more?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <i>The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.</i> -- H.L. Mencken </p><p> At least he didn't win. That was the attitude of "Survivor" fans who tuned in for Sunday's finale to see if one of the most shameless liars ever to appear on television would leave with the million-dollar prize. Jon Dalton -- or "Johnny Fairplay" as he preferred to be called -- did make it to the final three after he hatched an elaborate plan to garner sympathy and gain an advantage over his fellow players. He told a friend that if the show brought him on for a visit, which he knew that it might, he should tell Jon -- in front of the cameras, cast and crew -- that his grandmother had died. The scheme worked; the other players were choked up and conspired to let Jon win the reward challenge. Later, when teammates questioned his loyalty, he was quick to swear to them, <i>on his grandmother's grave,</i> that he was being true to his word. They didn't find out about his lie until the show aired last week. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/12/22/liar_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/12/22/liar_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now what?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 03:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/12/14/reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Ebert, David Horowitz, Andrew Sullivan, Noam Chomsky, Bianca Jagger and other Salon panelists panelists look ahead to the Bush years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Bianca Jagger is an internationally famous political activist.</b> </p><p>I was born in Nicaragua, in a country where we had a dictatorship for 43 years. I grew up as a child not knowing what free elections meant. I longed through those years to be able to live in a country that abides by the principles of democracy. I used to think that America was a place where the will of the people elected a president. Having observed elections in third-world countries and having observed the irregularities that took place in the elections in America, I saw similarities. If a parallel situation had taken place in a third-world country, we would have called it fraud. We would have called for reelections or a recounting of the votes. </p><p>This is not a shining moment for American democracy because, in the end, Americans have opted to preserve the institutions rather than to preserve democracy. Vice President Gore was pushed into a wall. From every side they urged him to be gracious and to come out and concede defeat. But the truth, which we all know, was that this election was won by Gore, and that President-elect Bush is usurping the position of the presidency. He has stolen the presidency from Gore. I think a lot of people are frightened and too cautious of using plain English. The American media is afraid to use the word "fraud." <i>Why?</i> It is important for Americans who believe in democracy, its principles and independent legal institutions to speak up. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullies of the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/24/conason_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/24/conason_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/col/horo/2000/07/24/conason</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Conason prefers personal attacks to political debate, just like his heroes Clinton and Gore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently <a href="/politics/feature/2000/06/26/scandal2/index.html">I called</a> the Clinton administration "the most criminal, the most corrupt, the most cynical administration in American history." I also referred to <a href="/directory/topics/joe_conason/index.html">Joe Conason</a> as a columnist "well known for his unflagging loyalty to every Clinton claim." Conason proved his loyalty immediately, by firing back a column attacking me politically and personally. </p><p>Of course I do not have "proof" for the assertion that Clinton surpasses all presidents in corruption, which Conason built a whole column around. Though many Clinton officials have been convicted, many more (including the culprit-in-chief) obviously have not. </p><p>Nonetheless, I believe the key charges in the Clinton scandals -- including the Whitewater crookery, the abusive use of military force for domestic political agendas and the collusion with Chinese agents that led to the loss of America's nuclear secrets and missile technologies -- will be shown over time to be as firmly based in fact as the deposition of Monica Lewinsky. (Let us not forget, moreover, that if it weren't for the preserved blue dress with its stain, people like Joe Conason would still be righteously insisting that she, and not he, was the liar.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/24/conason_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/24/conason_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smearing Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/hillary_clinton_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/hillary_clinton_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/03/06/hillary_clinton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first lady&#039;s lost Whitewater billing records were supposed to be the smoking gun that would lead to her indictment. Instead, they corroborated her claims of innocence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>lmost from the outset of his presidency, the <a href="/news/special/clinton/">hunters of Bill  Clinton</a> were simultaneously in hot pursuit of his controversial wife, <a href="/politics2000/directory/senate_candidates/hillary_clinton/index.html">Hillary Rodham Clinton</a>. As a former partner in the Rose Law Firm and as the steward  of her family's tangled finances, the first lady drew fire not only from the  Washington press corps but from Kenneth Starr's chief deputy in Arkansas, W.  Hickman Ewing Jr., a conservative Republican whose prosecutorial energy had  always included a tinge of fundamentalist zeal.</p><p>Ewing's moral certainty about Hillary Clinton's guilt soon seeped into the media  coverage of the Clinton "scandals." With an unseemly eagerness, Clinton  critics in the press began to trumpet rumors of her impending indictment. And  when a set of long-misplaced billing records from the Rose firm were found in  the White House, the crescendo of accusations reached a frenzied pitch.</p><p><font size="-3" color="#000000">- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- </font></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/hillary_clinton_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/06/hillary_clinton_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impeachment&#039;s little elves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/04/willey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/04/willey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/03/04/willey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a pack of  conservative lawyers used Matt Drudge and Clinton-accuser Kathleen Willey to scuttle a deal in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f the lawyers for Paula Jones and President Clinton had reached a<br />
settlement during the summer of 1997 -- an outcome both sides were trying to<br />
achieve in good faith -- the nation would have been spared the Monica<br />
Lewinsky affair<br />
and the <a href="/news/special/clinton/impeachment.html">impeachment fiasco</a> that followed. Jones' attorneys, Gilbert Davis<br />
and Joe<br />
Cammarata, thought they could work out a deal with Robert Bennett, the<br />
President's high-priced private counsel.</p><p>But a settlement, no matter how favorable to Jones, wouldn't have served the<br />
political purposes of the so-called "elves," an informal  group of  conservative attorneys who were secretly assisting her case.  At a delicate<br />
stage, the settlement discussions could be scuttled by creating distrust<br />
between the Clinton and Jones camps. And there was no better way to raise<br />
tensios among the lawyers than by leaking sensitive investigative material<br />
about the president to the press.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/04/willey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/04/willey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nabbing David Hale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/hale_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/hale_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/03/03/hale</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kenneth Starr&#039;s key Whitewater witness turned his government-funded loan company into an ATM machine for his politically connected friends. When the feds caught on, he tried to blame President Clinton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>o Little Rock judge and con man <a href = "/news/special/clinton/whitewater.html">David Hale,</a> suddenly facing a federal indictment, the right-wing obsession with ruining the Clinton presidency offered an excellent opportunity to evade the consequences of his own crimes. His embezzlement of $2 million from the U.S. government didn't trouble the Clinton-hating arch-segregationist "Justice Jim" Johnson or the gonzo conservative activists at Citizens United, who eagerly promoted Hale's uncorroborated charge: that the president had pressured Hale to OK a fraudulent loan to Susan McDougal, the Clintons' Whitewater partner.</p><p>But however zealous, those fringe advocates on the right couldn't do much for Hale by themselves.  The crooked judge's gambit couldn't succeed without attention from the national media -- including a few timely phone calls from a certain well-connected reporter for the New York Times.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/hale_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/hale_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temps for the vast right-wing conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/case_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/case_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/03/02/case</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Mellon Scaife and other leaders in the effort to bring down President Clinton were driven by ideology. Meet Larry Nichols and Larry Case, who were in it for the money.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>lthough the <a href="/news/special/clinton/">campaign to scandalize and destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton</a> involved politicians at the highest levels of the Republican Party, it also attracted freelance operatives whose motives were more pecuniary than ideological. During the 1992 election campaign, two of the most energetic of those in <a href="/news/1998/02/cov_05news.html">pursuit of scandalous allegations</a> was a pair of raffish Arkansans named <a href="/news/1997/11/13news.html">Larry Nichols and Larry Case</a>.</p><p>A disgruntled former state employee fired at then-Governor Clinton's behest after he got caught using a toll-free state phone to solicit funds for the Nicaraguan Contras, Nichols played a key role in bringing Gennifer Flowers' allegations of her alleged 12-year affair with Clinton to The Star tabloid newspaper. (A musician and composer of ad jingles, Nichols shared the same talent agent with Flowers.) He later went on to national fame as the narrator and star of "<a href="/news/1998/03/cov_11news.html">The Clinton Chronicles</a>," a Jerry Falwell-sponsored videotape which alleged that the president was involved in drug-smuggling, money-laundering and murder.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/case_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/02/case_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/kincaid_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/kincaid_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/2000/02/04/kincaid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The sheriff showed up with naked pictures of my daughter!" Plus: Pregnancy happens -- deal with it; Conason&#039;s stance on Bradley.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/mwt/feature/2000/01/31/kincaid/index.html">Is this child pornography?</a> </font></b><br />
<br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY JAMES R. KINCAID </font><br />
<br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666">(01/31/00)</font><br />
<br></p><p><b>J</b>ust three days ago the sheriff's department showed up in my office with  the pictures I sent for development. They had some naked  pictures of my daughter who is 5 years old. They were questioning me regarding the "pornographic" contents of the pictures I took. The detectives and child protection service agents pulled her into a private room at her school without an adult she knows and questioned her about this. I cannot find out what was said. In the end they believed they were family pictures, but they kept the pictures  and negatives. They also had me go to the criminal investigation office and make a statement. They say this is over but emotionally it is not for me, my daughter and our relationship.
<p align="right">-- Name withheld at writer's request</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/kincaid_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/kincaid_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exit poll</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/reacts_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/reacts_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics/2000/feature/2000/02/02/reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ann Coulter, Andrew Sullivan, Sean Wilentz, David Horowitz, Joe Conason and Fran Lebowitz on George W. Bush&#039;s disaster in New Hampshire.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Ann Coulter, columnist for George magazine:</b> Look, <a href="/politics2000/directory/candidates/john_mccain/index.html">John McCain's</a> my favorite Democrat, that's why I just can't figure out what he's doing in the <a href="/politics2000/directory/issues/primaries/index.html">Republican primaries.</a> I've seen some the surveys of why people are voting for McCain, and they're siding with him on liberal issues, which tells me that it's the liberal independents who gave McCain his success. They're never going to end up voting for a Republican anyway.</p><p>Oddly, I think McCain really helps Bush because all the other candidates are to the right of him. With McCain there, Bush can always say, "I'm the conservative in this race." And conservatives, you know, they do go out and vote when its raining outside. What's more amazing is really the <a href="/politics2000/feature/2000/01/31/mccain_bus/index.html">media's orgasm</a> over McCain. He's the New York Times' candidate. He's Geraldo's candidate. He's Chris Matthews' candidate. I think that they just decided that, after eight years of Clinton, the next president is going to be a Republican president, so they want it to be their Republican. The smart Democrats want <a href="/politics2000/directory/candidates/bill_bradley/index.html">Bradley,</a> but he can't win. So they went for McCain, and now his real constituency is the editors of the New York Times. And, for the most part, he's won them over.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/reacts_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/02/reacts_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/germany_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/germany_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/2000/01/25/germany</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compared to the U.S., Germany treats its immigrants well Plus: Macs need to be popular, hello, for Apple to survive; Newt the adulterer/Newt the hero]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/mwt/feature/2000/01/06/turks/index.html"><br />
Germany shuns "foreign" families<br />
</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY ALLISON LINN AND AYLA JEAN YACKLEY </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666">(01/06/00)</font><br></p><p><b>I</b> am an Australian citizen, and a permanent legal resident of the United States,<br />
thanks to my American wife, and I have three American children. I have<br />
lived here for seven years. I pay taxes like everyone else, however I<br />
am<br />
not eligible for most of the benefits that citizens are provided. I am<br />
not<br />
eligible for student loans, I am not eligible for Social Security, even<br />
though I have it taken out of my paycheck every month. I am not<br />
eligible<br />
for unemployment benefits even though my company pays unemployment<br />
insurance for me. The list of programs I am not eligible for is long.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/germany_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/germany_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whose vast conspiracy is it, anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/18/toobin_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/18/toobin_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/01/18/toobin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a plot to get President Clinton, argues Jeffrey Toobin. It just wasn&#039;t the one you think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he vast majority of Americans probably don't want to think about <a href="/news/1998/01/23list.html/">the Clinton crisis</a> ever again. Even the most lubricious revelers in the affair -- and who can claim to have endured this endless political snuff movie without doing a little furtive wallowing? -- must by now be suffering from a monumental case of post-unconsummated-oral-sex tristesse. We're sick of the media frenzy, sick of the culture war, sick of the breast-beating analysis. The whole sordid episode already seems, mercifully, never to have happened. Why on earth would anyone want to relive the ugliest one-night stand in American political history?</p><p>But before tuning the whole thing permanently out, it's worth remembering that a little over a year ago the nation saw what should have been merely an embarrassing episode in the career of a randy politician turned into a constitutional crisis. The Clinton affair was a bedroom farce that could have ended as tragedy. In all probability, only a harried prosecutor's badly worded definition of "sex" prevented an American president from being removed from office for the crime of lying under oath about a consensual sexual affair. Instead of amusing ourselves with ever more gargantuan corporate copulations, we could be in a toxic civil landscape, the tanks of triumphant Limbaughism rumbling against an army of bitter, morally relativist boomers. Which is why it's important, now that partisan passions have cooled, to look at exactly how and why this gigantic mess landed in our laps.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/18/toobin_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/18/toobin_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/conason_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/conason_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/2000/01/13/conason</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Joe Conason a bigot about the religious right?
Plus: Sigourney and Sandra and other absolutely fabulous divas Damien Cave missed; 
David Crosby?! Melissa, what were you thinking?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/news/col/cona/1999/12/31/enlightenment/index.html"> The Millennial Struggle Continues</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY JOE CONASON </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(12/31/99)</font><br></p><p><b>J</b>oe Conason's essay, "The Millennial Struggle Continues," was superb.<br />
Every<br />
point he made exposed the religious right for what it really is: A<br />
collection of dangerous reactionaries intent on imposing their twisted<br />
view<br />
of morality on everyone.</p><p>Consider the maniacal zeal with which these people, led by Ken Starr,<br />
carried out their insane witch hunt against their most hated enemy,<br />
President Clinton. We can breathe a huge sigh of relief that the<br />
effort<br />
failed, for it could have permanently weakened the institution of the<br />
presidency and resulted in grave consequences for our constitutional<br />
system<br />
of government.</p><p>Future historians will judge not the personal flaws of this president,<br />
but,<br />
rather the deliberate attempt by self-righteous demagogues to overthrow<br />
him.  That judgment will be harsh.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/conason_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/conason_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/bush_32/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/bush_32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/10/26/bush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shoddy journalism in George W. Bush case? Plus: Blaming Apple for geological events; "Law &#38; Order" spin-off&#039;s salacious camerawork.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"><br />
<a href="/news/feature/1999/10/18/cocaine/index.html">Book: Bush was arrested for cocaine in 1972</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY SALON STAFF </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(10/19/99)</font><br></p><p>and<br></p><p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/news/feature/1999/10/21/hatfield/index.html">Publisher halts George W. Bush bio</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY DARYL LINDSEY </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(10/22/99)</font><br></p><p><b>A</b>s much as I would like to believe this story, simple cultural history would seem to contradict it.  Why would such an obviously conventional thinker, social conformist, fraternity member yearning for acceptance and approval, use a drug in 1972 which would not become conventional, social or fraternal until the disco era of the late-'70s/early-'80s?  Could these cocaine rumors, desperately looking for a vessel, have been mistakenly placed in a vial of a punitive "community service" which actually has another account?  I suspect so.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/bush_32/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/26/bush_32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/elvis_costello/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/elvis_costello/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/09/28/elvis_costello</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In defense of Elvis Costello; NBC wimps out on "Will and Grace" decision; ban all school religious holidays!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/people/bc/1999/09/21/costello/index.html">Brilliant Careers: Elvis Costello</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY BILL WYMAN </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(09/21/99)</font></p><p><b>B</b>ill Wyman's piece on Elvis Costello is typical of the treatment Costello<br />
has received from rock critics over the past 10 years; once the electric<br />
guitar and the snide putdown ceased to be the focus of his work, their<br />
adoration turned to ridicule. Costello's ambition and sophistication should<br />
be welcomed as relief from the witless, one-dimensional rubbish that passes<br />
for popular music in 1999, but instead the media has cast him as a poseur<br />
and has-been. The prevailing critical wisdom that rock 'n' roll must be<br />
loud, simple and angry has consistently discouraged the kind of stylistic<br />
experimentation that would keep rock alive as an art form. Wasn't rock 'n'<br />
roll about freedom once? It has now become the most conservative music there<br />
is, and that's why Elvis Costello has outgrown it.</p><p align="right">-- Neil Oliver</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/elvis_costello/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/elvis_costello/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/14/air_rage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/14/air_rage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garrison Keillor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/09/14/air_rage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blame the airlines for "air rage"; Greil Marcus takes a tasteless swipe at the Spin Doctors; 
Mr. Blue&#039;s bad advice to single mom.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/travel/diary/hest/1999/09/07/rage/index.html">Flying in the age of air rage</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY ELLIOTT NEAL HESTER </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(09/07/99)</font></p><p><b>T</b>hrough their own actions, the airlines have created conditions<br />
that will predictably and reliably produce violent behavior in a segment of<br />
the mass population now flying. The airlines must take responsibility, and<br />
should act to 1) identify and reduce the possibility that<br />
violent outbreaks will occur under current conditions and 2) alter the<br />
conditions that create the violence. Otherwise, an informed and clever<br />
lawyer will be able to argue that the airline "provoked" violent behavior.</p><p align="right">-- Denny Kernochan<br />
<br>Northridge, Calif.</p><p><b>W</b>ithout minimizing what happened to Renee Sheffer, I submit that<br />
Salon could find more immediate topics to report on instead of hyping<br />
such a minimal "problem." My guess would be that flight crew are at<br />
greater risk of bodily injury in airport parking lots than they are<br />
while in flight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/14/air_rage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/14/air_rage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/05/stayner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/05/stayner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/08/05/stayner</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defending one of California&#039;s "blood brothers"; Conason got it wrong; stop demonizing the Backstreet Boys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/mwt/hot/1999/07/30/steven_stayner/index.html">Blood brothers</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY SARAH BEACH</font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(7/30/99)</font><br></p><p><b>C</b>asting aspersions on Stephen Stayner, as did the lady in the coffee shop whom Sarah Beach refers to,<br />
is clearly wrong. He emerged from his ordeal more a hero than a victim,<br />
walking from Comptche to Ukiah (at least 10 miles, over a mountain range)<br />
to save Parnell's second victim.</p><p>But the questions about the Stayner family remain, and are really<br />
unaddressed by Beach in her article. Steven was picked up by a stranger<br />
in Merced and was told his family had given him away. I am not sure what is<br />
known about Steven's immediate reaction to that, but he does not seem<br />
to have found it utterly unbelievable. He lived for seven years without, it<br />
seems, ever telling anyone that he had an earlier family that gave him<br />
away. Life with Parnell must have been hell on earth, but Steven does not<br />
seem to have been nostalgic for life with his real parents. Beach, if I<br />
understand her correctly, seemed to have had no inkling during the years<br />
they were close friends in Comptche that Steven had a previous family.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/08/05/stayner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/05/stayner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/21/blair_witch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/21/blair_witch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/07/21/blair_witch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#039;s afraid of "The Blair Witch Project"? Plus: Making money with open source; did all the candidates shirk Vietnam service?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"><a href="/ent/movies/review/1999/07/13/blair/index.html">"The Blair Witch Project"</a></font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> REVIEWED BY MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS<font color="#666666"><br />
(07/13/99)</font></font><br></p><p><b>E</b>ver since "The Blair Witch Project" was screened at Sundance, I've been reading notices at Internet<br />
fan sites describing it as the scariest flick ever made. But the curtain is<br />
coming up on their product, and "The Blair Witch Project" doesn't even<br />
come close to living up to its hype.</p><p>Two weeks ago I attended a preview screening in a packed theater. When<br />
the lights came up, people actually chuckled. There was a palpable sense<br />
of "That's it? That's all?" in the air. Somebody came down to the front<br />
row and asked, "Gee, was it scarier down here?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/07/21/blair_witch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/21/blair_witch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/07/cruise_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/07/cruise_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/07/07/cruise</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom Cruise is sexy to everyone, not just gays; doctors have become cogs in the health care machine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/people/feature/1999/06/30/cruise/index.html">Cruising Cruise</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY CHRISTOPHER KELLY </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(06/30/99)</font><br></p><p><b>C</b>hristopher Kelly delved into Cruise's sexual ambiguity in certain roles, and his vulnerability,<br />
as being particularly appealing to gays. I submit, however, that those qualities are universally appealing.<br />
Tom Cruise is Everyman, as every man would like to think he is --<br />
intelligent, handsome, caring, brilliantly successful and married to Nicole Kidman.</p><p>Cruise often illuminates a universal insecurity in men -- an<br />
insecurity they prefer to deny.  It is the rare male who has not known<br />
panic when confronted with his first sexual experience as an adult, confronted with a partner capable of<br />
judging, capable of finding you wanting.  The fear of failure is<br />
deeply ingrained in men, who are raised to win at football, baseball --<br />
virtually everything they do from a small age.  It's the American way.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/07/07/cruise_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/07/07/cruise_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letters to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/skinny_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/skinny_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/letters/1999/06/22/skinny</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last thing we need is more diet mania; what&#039;s so scary about Jesus?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><font face="times, times new roman" size="4"> <a href="/books/feature/1999/06/14/skinny/index.html">The wages of thin</a> </font></b><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2"> BY MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS </font><br><font face="times, times new roman" size="2" color="#666666"><br />
(06/14/99)</font><br></p><p><b>T</b>hree cheers for Mary Elizabeth Williams' thoughtful pan of a book of the sort that ought to be burned.  The last thing we need is another hymn sung in praise of diet mania -- even a sort of vaguely self-aware one as this tome appears to be.</p><p>I will not take Williams up on her invitation to call her<br />
petty and shallow for crash-dieting in college to get more male<br />
attention.  But I will respectfully suggest that the men who would only pay attention to her after she lost<br />
weight are the petty and shallow ones.  Williams concluded instead that getting thin was<br />
obviously the solution because it "worked."</p><p>Worked at what?  Getting the attention of insensitive, egotistical men?<br />
I have a teenage daughter and I have already told her:  Any man that asks or tells you to lose weight, <i>stay away;</i> do not give him the time of day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/skinny_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/skinny_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

