<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > John Boehner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/john_boehner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>White House trolls Republicans over Obamacare hashtag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP's #ObamaCareinThreeWords campaign takes a turn for the hilarious following ominous @whitehouse response ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans are preparing for a full floor vote on a repeal of the Affordable Care Act on Thursday. In the meantime, they have started a Twitter campaign in the form of the hashtag #ObamaCareinThreeWords, to get opponents of the law excited about the vote.</p><p>It began with tweets by Republicans:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335116680499974144"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335097469962682368"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335115056721317888"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335118484482695168"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335121258423386112"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335120630779359232"]</p><p>But then the White House started trolling them:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335104215863132160"]</p><p>The hashtag, which began trending, also inspired some political pundits to get in on the joke:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335118202113761280"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335107475634278401"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335099983093178368"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335098244176674816"]</p><p>But even ultra-conservative Republican Rep. Steve Stockman knew where to draw the line:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335120430815932416"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans will again try to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, Republicans will add to the dozens of times they tried and failed to repeal the Affordable Care Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, House Republicans will try again to repeal the Affordable Care Act, this time after <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare/">pressure</a> from freshman conservative members of the caucus who are frustrated that they have not yet had the chance to vote for a repeal.</p><p>This time around, House Republicans are fueled by the IRS scandal, because of the agency's role in distributing funds from the law. The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/05/15/what-the-irs-scandal-means-for-health-care-reform/">Washington Post</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner: &#8220;Who&#8217;s going to jail over this scandal?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_rips_irs_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_rips_irs_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The house speaker rips the IRS as Attorney General Eric Holder prepares to testify]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — As the investigation into the IRS' targeting of conservative political groups widens, House Speaker John Boehner says he has a question: "Who's going to jail over this scandal?"</p><p>"There are laws in place to prevent this type of abuse. Someone made a conscious decision to harass and to hold up these requests for tax exempt status," Boehner told reporters Wednesday. "I think we need to know who they are and whether they violated the law. Clearly someone violated the law."</p><p>The Justice Department is opening a criminal investigation of the Internal Revenue Service just as another probe concludes that lax management enabled agents to improperly target tea party groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax exempt status.</p><p>Attorney General Eric Holder said he ordered the FBI to investigate Friday — the day the IRS publicly acknowledged that it had singled out conservative groups.</p><p>"Those (actions) were, I think, as everyone can agree, if not criminal, they were certainly outrageous and unacceptable," Holder said. "But we are examining the facts to see if there were criminal violations."</p><p>Holder is scheduled to testify Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee. It is the first of several hearings that will focus on the issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_rips_irs_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_rips_irs_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner on IRS: &#8220;Who’s going to jail over this scandal?”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Clearly someone violated the law,” the House speaker said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday that resignations over the IRS scandal would not be enough, and he believes there were criminal violations involved in the alleged targeting of conservative groups by the agency. “My question isn’t about who’s going to resign, my question is who’s going to jail over this scandal?” he <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/15/boehner-on-irs-scandal-whos-going-to-jail-over-this-scandal/">told</a> reporters.</p><p>“There are laws in place to prevent this type of abuse," Boehner continued. "Someone made a conscious decision to harass and to hold up these requests for tax-exempt status. I think we need to know who they are and whether they violated the law. Clearly someone violated the law."</p><p>On Tuesday, Attorney General Eric Holder said that he has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/holder_ive_ordered_a_probe_of_outrageous_irs_targeting/">ordered</a> the FBI to investigate whether any criminal violations occurred. Holder is scheduled to appear before a House committee on Wednesday, where he will likely face questions about this scandal, as well as the Department of Justice's decision to subpoena phone records from the Associated Press.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawmakers jump on DOJ for AP spying</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lawmakers_jump_on_doj_for_ap_spying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lawmakers_jump_on_doj_for_ap_spying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Vt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians generally unconcerned by the government's vast spy dragnet are now speaking out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/govt-obtains-wide-ap-phone-records-probe">news</a> Monday that the government's vast surveillance dragnet also included the phone records of Associated Press journalists, Capitol Hill lawmakers -- largely unperturbed by First and Fourth Amendment abrogations when Muslims and activists have been targeted recent years -- are slamming the DOJ in defense of the Fourth Estate.</p><p>To be fair, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has built a reputation for defending privacy rights, especially online. He said in a statement, “The burden is always on the government when they go after private information -- especially information regarding the press or its confidential sources. I want to know more about this case, but on the face of it, I am concerned that the government may not have met that burden,”</p><div>Fox News <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/13/lawmakers-rip-justice-department-over-ap-phone-record-grab/">pointed out </a>that a number of Republicans also expressed concern, swift to make political meat out of an undeniable scandal:</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lawmakers_jump_on_doj_for_ap_spying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lawmakers_jump_on_doj_for_ap_spying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House: Republicans ignored Benghazi emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/wh_republicans_had_no_concerns_about_benghazi_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/wh_republicans_had_no_concerns_about_benghazi_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Administration officials say top Republicans saw the emails two months ago and didn't express any issues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican members of Congress raised no objections when they first saw internal emails detailing the evolution of the administration’s talking points on Benghazi almost two months ago, senior administration officials said in response to a question from Salon today, and House Speaker John Boehner declined to attend or send a representative to that briefing.</p><p>Lawyers with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence briefed House and Senate Intelligence Committee members in March about the emails, which ABC News <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/benghazi_emails_reveal_turf_war_over_talking_points/">released today</a> to much hullabaloo, after officials said they would make them available to members of Congress <a href="http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2013/02/22/white-house-sending-benghazi-emails-to-senate/">in February</a>.</p><p>Yesterday, Boehner <a href="http://www.speaker.gov/general/reports-confirm-scrubbing-benghazi-talking-points-boehner-demands-white-house-release-e">called for</a> the release of the emails, but the administration officials, who agreed to speak on a conference call with reporters only on the condition of anonymity, said today that Boehner would have seen them had he attended the briefing, to which he and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi were also invited.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/wh_republicans_had_no_concerns_about_benghazi_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/wh_republicans_had_no_concerns_about_benghazi_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans will again try to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This amounts to 30-plus times the House has tried to scrap the law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House of Representatives will again vote to try to repeal the Affordable Care Act next week, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor announced on Wednesday, adding to the almost 40 times that House Republicans have failed to repeal the law.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/08/house-to-vote-again-on-repealing-obamacare-next-week/">the Washington Post</a> reports, Republicans have tried to use procedural tricks, in addition to full-on floor votes, to repeal Obamacare, meaning that the exact number of times they've tried is somewhat disputed. Some say it's been 33 times since 2010, others say closer to 40.</p><p>Cantor, R-Va., tweeted on Tuesday:</p><p>[embedtweet id="332158364320686080"]</p><p>From the Post:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP pushes bogus workplace bill from 1996</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans' new plan to help working families is neither new, nor helpful to working families. Oops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, House Republicans are rolling out a plan they hope will <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_seeks_alternative_to_overtime_pay/singleton/">boost the party's appeal among working families</a>, by giving private sector workers the option of converting overtime pay to paid time off. Pushing the bill, which is expected to get a vote this week, is House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who made it a key item in his <a href="http://majorityleader.gov/newsroom/2013/02/excerpts-of-leader-cantors-major-policy-speech-makinglifework.html">big February speech</a> pitching the GOP to working families. The speech was meant to kick off the GOP's <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/05/cantor-republicans-speech-message/1892513/">new, softer agenda, but if the party is looking for fresh ideas after their defeat in the 2012 election, this isn't one.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House conservatives want more failed attempts to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/house_conservatives_want_more_failed_attempts_to_repeal_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/house_conservatives_want_more_failed_attempts_to_repeal_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Scalise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freshman GOPers are "frustrated" they haven't had the chance to not repeal health care reform yet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freshman Republicans in the House say that they are "frustrated" that leadership hasn't made a single attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act this year - after almost 40 attempts since the bill became law in 2010 - even though they know the move is purely symbolic and bound to fail.</p><p>At a panel on Wednesday hosted by the Heritage Foundation, conservative Republicans criticized leadership for failing to bring forward a repeal in 2013. "We need to continue fighting for repeal. We need a clean vote on repeal," said Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, who chairs the conservative Republican Study Committee.</p><p>From Sahil Kapur at <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/04/house-gop-conservatives-obamacare-repeal-vote.php">TPM</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“If you’re a freshman — the guys who’ve been up here the last year, we can go home and say listen, we voted 36 different times to repeal or replace Obamacare. Tell me what the new guys are supposed to say,” [Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C.] said. “We haven’t had a repeal or replace vote this year.”</p> <p>“We have not had a chance as freshmen to do that,” said first-term Rep. Trey Radel (R-FL). “Even if it’s just symbolic — and even if we understand that process-wise we are not going to be able to say, okay we want repeal, it’s done, and it’s over. But this is the issue that so many people around the country who love the Republican Party are frustrated with.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/house_conservatives_want_more_failed_attempts_to_repeal_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/house_conservatives_want_more_failed_attempts_to_repeal_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minority of useless undemocratic legislative body blocks modest gun control legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/minority_of_useless_undemocratic_legislative_body_blocks_modest_gun_control_legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/minority_of_useless_undemocratic_legislative_body_blocks_modest_gun_control_legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The gun measure failed because of dumb filibuster rules, not Joe Manchin's supposed "lack of confidence"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minority of senators voted against a bill that would have expanded background checks for gun sales -- a proposal that was widely acknowledged to fall well short of the sort of gun control necessary to actually curb America's shocking amount of gun crime, but one that was also determined to be the strongest possible measure with any hope of passing Congress -- and that minority "won" the vote, because the Senate has weird made-up nonsense rules. Four Democratic senators, from some of America's least populous states, voted with the winning minority.</p><p>Those Democrats were Heidi Heitkamp (N.D. -- a state that should not be a separate state from South Dakota), Max Baucus (Mont.), Mark Begich (big icy pool of oil by Canada) and Mark Pryor (Ark.). Baucus, Begich and Pryor are up for reelectiion next year. Heitkamp's excuse is that the entire population of her state is old white gun nuts. Liberals may call for those senators to be punished. Democrats will respond, correctly, that if those senators lose primaries to more liberal candidates, Republicans will win those seats.  The correct response, as always, is to eliminate the U.S. Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/minority_of_useless_undemocratic_legislative_body_blocks_modest_gun_control_legislation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/minority_of_useless_undemocratic_legislative_body_blocks_modest_gun_control_legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP campaign chair&#8217;s surprising defense of Medicare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Walden has labeled the president's new budget plan a "shocking attack on seniors"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President’s offer to cut spending on Medicare and Social Security is confusing some conservatives.  In the past, they’ve of course labeled such cuts a sign of Seriousness but his budget caught them off balance.  And yes, that’s very weird because he’s had the Medicare cuts in earlier budgets and the Social Security cut (chained CPI) in his fiscal cliff offer to Boehner.</p><p>Anyway, initial responses ranged from the incoherent—”I don’t see this as fundamental entitlement reform as much as clarifying a statistic which does happen to save money” (Paul Ryan)—to the opportunistic “Let’s set aside our differences and come together on things we can agree on” (Eric Cantor saying let’s do CPI but not the higher tax revenues in the budget)—to the faux-outraged House GOP campaign chair Greg Walden who labeled the President’s budget a “shocking attack on seniors.”</p><p>It’s that last part where things got weird today.  As the WaPo <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">reports</a>, Boehner and Cantor are distancing themselves from Walden, since they want these cuts.  And the very conservative Club for Growth…</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House courts progressives on chained CPI</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/white_house_courts_progressives_on_chained_cpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/white_house_courts_progressives_on_chained_cpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chained CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senior Obama officials defend their plan to Salon, make case for why potential cut to Social Security isn't so bad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before the White House releases its budget today, the line item that's made the most waves is the inclusion of a switch to the so-called chained CPI, which would reduce benefits for Social Security recipients by changing the way inflation is calculated. This naturally touched off a firestorm on the left from many who say that, in addition to being bad policy, it's political suicide for a Democratic president to cut a social safety net program.</p><p>We've given <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/liberals_groups_threaten_primaries_over_obama_budget/">plenty of space</a> to the detractors, and on Tuesday, two senior White House officials laid out their case to Salon and a small group of other reporters in a background briefing. Here's what they're thinking:</p><p>First of all, the officials insisted, the White House will not go any further than what they're offering now. As they see it, they went halfway with their last offer to House Speaker John Boehner and the CPI switch, so now they're looking to see if anyone will meet them there. This way, if a grand bargain never materializes -- which they acknowledge is the most likely scenario -- it will be harder for Republicans to blame them for killing it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/white_house_courts_progressives_on_chained_cpi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/white_house_courts_progressives_on_chained_cpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner rejects Obama budget</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/boehner_rejects_obama_budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/boehner_rejects_obama_budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chained CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House speaker summarily dismisses the White House plan just hours after its release]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for moving to the middle to find common ground with Republicans. Just a few hours after the White House released its official budget, which <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/liberals_groups_threaten_primaries_over_obama_budget/">included the Social Security cuts</a> that liberals hate, House Speaker John Boehner rejected it out of hand, saying it doesn't go nearly far enough. "Despite talk about so-called balance, the president’s last offer was significantly skewed in favor of higher taxes and included only modest entitlement savings. He said he could go no further toward the middle, and that’s why his last offer was rejected," Boehner said <a href="http://www.speaker.gov/press-release/speaker-boehner-statement-president-s-budget">in a statement</a>.</p><p>There's not even lip service paid to the fact that Obama is risking mutiny in his own party by putting Social Security on the table. Instead, Boehner sees Obama's move a sign of weakness and demands more. "If the president believes these modest entitlement savings are needed to help shore up these programs, there's no reason they should be held hostage for more tax hikes," he said.</p><p>There's no way Boehner even had time to read the whole thing. And thus, the problem with pre-conceding to something that Republicans were not even asking for.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/boehner_rejects_obama_budget/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/boehner_rejects_obama_budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama budget reportedly includes cuts to Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/obama_budget_reportedly_includes_cuts_to_social_security_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/obama_budget_reportedly_includes_cuts_to_social_security_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposal, an attempt to compromise with Republicans, would reduce the deficit by $1.8 trillion over 10 years ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><article>WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is proposing cuts to Social Security as an attempt to compromise with Republicans on the budget.A senior administration official says the budget Obama will offer to Congress next Wednesday would reduce the deficit by $1.8 trillion over 10 years. It includes a revised inflation adjustment called “chained CPI” that would curb cost-of-living increases in Social Security and other benefit programs.</p> </article><div> <article>The senior administration official stressed it is not the president’s preferred approach but a compromise proposal to try to reach a long-term budget deal. Obama first made the offer to House Speaker John Boehner last year.The official spoke on a condition of anonymity since the budget has yet to be released. Technically, the administration actually would be limiting the growth of Social Security.</p> </article> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/obama_budget_reportedly_includes_cuts_to_social_security_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/obama_budget_reportedly_includes_cuts_to_social_security_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House members finalizing sweeping immigration bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/house_members_finalizing_sweeping_immigration_bill_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/house_members_finalizing_sweeping_immigration_bill_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation would offer work permits and possible citizenship to millions living illegally in the U.S.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A group of Republicans and Democrats in the House is finalizing a sweeping immigration bill that offers work permits and the eventual prospect of citizenship to millions of people living illegally in the United States, aides say. That path to citizenship, however, is likely to take at least 15 years for many, longer than envisioned by Senate immigration negotiators or by President Barack Obama.</p><p>The secretive House effort, which also aims to further tighten the border against foreigners crossing illegally into the U.S. and crack down on employers who hire them, has been overshadowed by the bipartisan negotiations in the Senate, which is expected to act first on immigration legislation. But it's an important indication that a number of lawmakers, including Republicans, in the conservative-dominated House want to have a say in crafting a comprehensive overhaul of U.S. immigration law.</p><p>"We have legislative language that we'll be ready to go forward on, not concepts but actual language," Rep. John Carter, R-Texas, a leader of the group, said this week on "Capital Tonight," a program on cable news channel YNN in Central Texas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/house_members_finalizing_sweeping_immigration_bill_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/house_members_finalizing_sweeping_immigration_bill_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio isn&#8217;t immigration reform&#8217;s only potential saboteur</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Chuck Schumer pops the champagne, he's got to deal with senator's delay tactics and a Republican House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC News' <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/01/17552059-first-thoughts-aprils-shower-of-activity-on-capitol-hill?lite">"First Read" yesterday</a> crowed about an "April's shower of activity on Capitol Hill," as Congress defied its recent history of gridlock and ... made gradual, grudging process on negotiations on various initiatives that might eventually turn into bills that might eventually pass. The brightest spot of news was on immigration reform. Over the weekend, we heard that "labor and business" (that is, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce) had reached a mutually agreeable compromise on guest workers. On Sunday, "Gang of Eight" member Chuck Schumer all but promised that reform would happen, and happen soon. Then, Sen. Marco Rubio, a member of that gang, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/what_is_marco_rubio_up_to/">publicly announced his intention to slow everything down.</a></p><p>Rubio <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/04/01/_real_hearings_the_search_for_another_scapegoat_if_conservatives_want_to.html">sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy</a> in which he demanded more hearings. So, so many hearings. (Rubio's letter contained the word "hearings" six times.) And open amendments, which is basically asking permission for anti-reform senators to attempt to make a series of potentially toxic votes if they want their precious reform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Americans say GOP &#8220;unwilling to compromise&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey looked at the biggest critiques Americans have of each party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/161573/americans-top-critique-gop-unwilling-compromise.aspx">Gallup</a> poll finds that the biggest critique of Republicans by Americans is that they're "too inflexible" and "unwilling to compromise," while for Democrats it's that they "spend too much" and "increase the budget deficit."</p><p>According to the poll, which measured what Americans dislike about each party, 21 percent of national adults said Republicans don't compromise, including 26 percent of Republicans, 17 percent of independents and 22 percent of Democrats. The second most common criticism was that Republicans are for "protecting the wealthy, not the middle class."</p><p>For Democrats, 14 percent said they spend too much, including 23 percent of Republicans, 11 percent of independents and 10 percent of Democrats. The second biggest criticism was that Democrats were also "unwilling to compromise."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner: House will keep trying to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/boehner_house_will_keep_trying_to_repeal_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/boehner_house_will_keep_trying_to_repeal_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The House will continue working to scrap the law in its entirety," he said on Obamacare's third anniversary ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite trying and failing to repeal Obamacare almost 40 times since it passed 3 years ago, House Republicans are not finished. House Speaker John Boehner marked the three-year anniversary of the law's passage by saying that "The House will continue working to scrap the law in its entirety."</p><p>“This week, the House passed Republicans’ balanced budget that fully repeals and defunds ObamaCare to protect families, workers and seniors from its devastating consequences. The House will continue working to scrap the law in its entirety, and will use oversight authority to expose its harmful impacts as they continue to unfold,” Boehner said in a statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/boehner_house_will_keep_trying_to_repeal_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/boehner_house_will_keep_trying_to_repeal_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP slowly shifting away from immigration hardline</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/gop_slowly_shifts_away_from_immigration_hardline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/gop_slowly_shifts_away_from_immigration_hardline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the House is reportedly "very close" to an immigration deal that includes a pathway to citizenship]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Republicans try to court the ever-growing Hispanic demographic and make up for losses in 2012, opposition to immigration reform is slowly crumbling away. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., an early potential contender for president in 2016, was the latest on Tuesday to imply his openness to a pathway to citizenship, saying in a speech that if undocumented immigrants want to work in this country, “then we will find a place for you."</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/20/us/politics/gop-opposition-to-immigration-law-is-falling-away.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">New York Times</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>[The] new political landscape in Washington contrasts sharply with just a few years ago, when most Republicans derided the idea of legalized status for illegal immigrants as a form of amnesty that would simply encourage more people to cross the border illegally.</p> <p>The overall shift in sentiment means that four months after Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee, made “self-deportation” the party’s official position on immigration — and lost decisively to President Obama, especially among Hispanic voters — top party strategists and lawmakers of all ideological stripes are racing to change course.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/gop_slowly_shifts_away_from_immigration_hardline/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/gop_slowly_shifts_away_from_immigration_hardline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP: We&#8217;ve been lying all along</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowles-Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boehner's admission that we don't really have a debt crisis reveals his party's ulterior, program-cutting motives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I'd write these words, but here goes: Thank you, John Boehner. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for finally admitting on national television that all the fiscal cliffs, sequestrations and budget battles you've created are, indeed, artificially fabricated by ideologues and self-interested politicians and not the result of some imminent crisis that's out of our control.</p><p>America owes this debt of gratitude to Boehner after he finally came clean on yesterday's edition of <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/17/boehner_agrees_with_obama_we_do_not_have_an_immediate_debt_crisis.html">ABC's "This Week"</a> and admitted that "we do not have an immediate debt crisis." (His admission was followed up by Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, who quickly echoed much the same sentiment on <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/paul-ryan-tells-cbs-bob-schieffer-we-do-not-have-a-debt-crisis/">CBS' "Face the Nation"</a>).</p><p>In offering up such a stunningly honest admission, the GOP leader has put himself on record as agreeing with President Obama, who has previously acknowledged that demonstrable reality. But the big news here isn't just about the politics of a Republican House speaker tacitly admitting they agree with a Democratic president. It is also about a bigger admission revealing the fact that the GOP's fiscal alarmism is not merely some natural reaction to reality, but a calculated means to other ideological ends.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
