<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > John F. Kennedy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/john_f_kennedy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Triumph of the Tea Party mindset</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/triumph_of_the_tea_party_mindset/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/triumph_of_the_tea_party_mindset/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyndon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't be fooled by those who say it's dying: The fiscal cliff impasse proves its spirit dominates the GOP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two stories that might seem to contradict each other ran in the New York Times this week. One <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/us/politics/tea-party-its-clout-diminished-turns-to-fringe-issues.html?pagewanted=all">declared</a> the Tea Party movement “significantly weakened” in the wake of November’s elections and on its way to becoming “just another political faction.” The other <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/us/politics/little-sense-of-fiscal-urgency-as-senators-prepare-to-return.html">noted</a> that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell might be concerned about a potential 2014 primary challenge – enough to filibuster any fiscal cliff plan that President Obama and Democrats draw up, no matter how modest.</p><p>The problem, of course, is that the Tea Party’s power resides in Republican primaries, where conservative purists wreaked considerable havoc in the past two election cycles. This included, famously, McConnell’s home state of Kentucky, where the minority leader’s protégé was crushed in a 2010 GOP Senate primary by Rand Paul. Now McConnell has to worry about suffering a similar fate in two years, especially if his handling of the current fiscal impasse evokes cries of treason from the base. How could this square with claims of fading clout for the Tea Party?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/triumph_of_the_tea_party_mindset/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/triumph_of_the_tea_party_mindset/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everything you know about the 1960s is wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/everything_you_know_about_the_1960s_is_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/everything_you_know_about_the_1960s_is_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Eve of Destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The 1960s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyndon Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Patterson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think it was a decade of sex, protest and psychedelics? Nope. As late as 1964, the decade looked like the '50s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late 1964 was a buoyant time for the majority of Americans: a prosperous year that promoted extraordinarily high expectations about the future. As in the previous twenty years, large numbers of people were flocking to buy houses in the suburbs and climbing into the middle classes.</p><p>If there could have been a nationwide soundtrack for late 1964, it would have been especially upbeat, featuring hit songs by the Supremes (“Baby Love,” “Come See About Me”), the Beatles (“A Hard Day’s Night,” “I Feel Fine”), and the Beach Boys (“I Get Around”).</p><p>John F. Kennedy’s eloquent calls for a New Frontier had raised expectations his death could not dim. Liberals, led by President Johnson, redoubled their efforts for reform. In May, speaking before some eighty thousand enthusiastic listeners (including Republican governor George Romney) at the University of Michigan’s football stadium, Lyndon Johnson had called for congressional approval of a Great Society — a hugely ambitious set of domestic reforms and programs. That August, Congress appropriated $1 billion to support the Economic Opportunity Act, which promised to wage a “War against Poverty.”</p><p>- - - - - - - - - - -</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/everything_you_know_about_the_1960s_is_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/everything_you_know_about_the_1960s_is_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cuban Missile Crisis: An all-too-real October surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/the_cuban_missile_crisis_an_all_too_real_october_surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/the_cuban_missile_crisis_an_all_too_real_october_surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October surprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban Missile Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikita Khrushchev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pair of PBS specials reminds us that 50 years ago this week, we were on the brink of total nuclear annihilation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed at first more a testimony to his own advanced age that 75-year-old Bob Schieffer invoked the Cuban Missile Crisis before the final presidential debate got underway in Boca Raton, Fla., Monday night. Yet, as a pair of PBS documentaries tonight reminds us, nothing could be more central to a contemporary foreign policy discussion than the frightening brink of total nuclear annihilation reached during that tense October, 50 years ago this week.</p><p>Just about the whole vocabulary of current international dealings were used in that conflict half a century ago. Blockades, showing strength, drawing a red line — all part of Monday’s debate — were at the center of the Cuban Missile Crisis. And the war porn that got us all into it – annotated aerial spy plane photos of construction sites and alleged warmaking plans — along with show-and-tell demonstrations at the U.N., were part of the process of invading Iraq a decade ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/the_cuban_missile_crisis_an_all_too_real_october_surprise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/23/the_cuban_missile_crisis_an_all_too_real_october_surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week the earth stood still</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/the_week_the_earth_stood_still/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/the_week_the_earth_stood_still/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noam Chomsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban Missile Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fifty years after the Cuban Missile Crisis, its lessons about the perils of global domination still resonate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world stood still 50 years ago during the last week of October, from the moment when it learned that the Soviet Union had placed nuclear-armed missiles in Cuba until the crisis was officially ended -- though unknown to the public, only officially.</p><p>The image of the world standing still is the turn of phrase of Sheldon Stern, former historian at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, who published the authoritative version of the tapes of the ExComm meetings where Kennedy and a close circle of advisers debated how to respond to the crisis.  Those meetings were secretly recorded by the president, which might bear on the fact that his stand throughout the recorded sessions is relatively temperate compared to other participants, who were unaware that they were speaking to history. </p><p>Stern has just published an accessible and accurate review of this critically important documentary record, finally declassified in the late 1990s.  I will keep to that here. “Never before or since,” he concludes, “has the survival of human civilization been at stake in a few short weeks of dangerous deliberations,” culminating in “the week the world stood still.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/the_week_the_earth_stood_still/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/the_week_the_earth_stood_still/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuban missile crisis was a triumph of diplomacy, not brinksmanship</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/cuban_missile_crisis_beliefs_endure_after_50_years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/cuban_missile_crisis_beliefs_endure_after_50_years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuban Missile Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/cuban_missile_crisis_beliefs_endure_after_50_years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Historians are re-evaluating the Kennedy administration's seminal success]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAVANA (AP) — The world stood at the brink of Armageddon for 13 days in October 1962 when President John F. Kennedy drew a symbolic line in the Atlantic and warned of dire consequences if Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev dared to cross it.</p><p>An American U-2 spy plane flying high over Cuba had snapped aerial photographs of Soviet ballistic missile sites that could launch nuclear warheads with little warning at the United States, just 90 miles away. It was the height of the Cold War, and many people feared nuclear war would annihilate human civilization.</p><p>Soviet ships carrying nuclear equipment steamed toward Kennedy's "quarantine" zone around the island, but turned around before reaching the line. "We're eyeball-to-eyeball, and I think the other fellow just blinked," U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk famously said, a quote that largely came to be seen as defining the crisis.</p><p>In the five decades since the nuclear standoff between Washington and Moscow, much of the long-held conventional wisdom about the missile crisis has been knocked down, including the common belief that Kennedy's bold brinksmanship ruled the day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/cuban_missile_crisis_beliefs_endure_after_50_years/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/cuban_missile_crisis_beliefs_endure_after_50_years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Killing Kennedy&#8221;: Bill O&#8217;Reilly wimps out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/killing_kennedy_bill_oreilly_wimps_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/killing_kennedy_bill_oreilly_wimps_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly Killing Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13033564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not: Bill O'Reilly once showed guts reporting on JFK. His new insta-history shows a bulldog gone weak]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, Bill O’Reilly had balls when it came to investigating the Kennedy assassination. Back in 1991 -- as a reporter for the tabloid TV news show, “Inside Edition” – O’Reilly <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4OLJthRj6Q">had the guts</a> to track the epic crime all the way into the dark labyrinth of the CIA. Following up on the important work done by investigators for the House Select Committee on Assassinations in the late ‘70s, O’Reilly boldly told his “Inside Edition” audience that there were “crucial” links between alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald and the CIA. O’Reilly also reported that the CIA had infiltrated the office of New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, who brought the only criminal case in the JFK assassination to trial, in an effort to sabotage Garrison’s investigation.</p><p>That was then – when O’Reilly was a scrappy reporter for low-budget syndicated TV. But now, of course, he’s BILL O’REILLY – Fox News icon, a lavishly paid centerpiece of the Murdoch empire. Everything he says   -- every windy pontification and dyspeptic remark – is writ LARGE. He can no longer afford to have the courage of his suspicions. In O’Reilly’s new ideological mold, the CIA is not the incubator of an unspeakable crime against American democracy – it’s the defender of the greatest nation in the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/killing_kennedy_bill_oreilly_wimps_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/killing_kennedy_bill_oreilly_wimps_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We don&#8217;t need truth vigilantes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12440051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But we do need good political reporting, and the media's rote repetition of Santorum's JFK lies fell short]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times public editor Arthur Brisbane got a lot of grief last month for a blog post in which he asked readers whether the Times ought to be <a href="http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/should-the-times-be-a-truth-vigilante/">"a truth vigilante."</a> I didn't join the pile-on, because truth be told, I kind of understood what he was getting at. Sure, "truth vigilante" is a shrill, easily mocked term: It doesn't take "vigilantism" to get at the truth, only good reporting. But there can be questions for editors and reporters about how far is too far – what's good reporting, and what's hectoring? What's debunking, and what's partisan water-carrying? (Also, I don't like the practice of mocking people for asking questions, even when we think the answer should be obvious. Better that Brisbane ask than to ignore the issue entirely.) I can understand why some cases aren't clear.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/27/we_dont_need_truth_vigilantes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum&#8217;s JFK story makes me want to throw up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/santorums_jfk_story_makes_me_want_to_throw_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/santorums_jfk_story_makes_me_want_to_throw_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12436211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kennedy never said anything like "people of faith have no role in the public square," and the GOP zealot knows that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>"We establish no religion in this country, we command no worship, we mandate no belief, nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate. All are free to believe or not believe, all are free to practice a faith or not, and those who believe are free, and should be free, to speak of and act on their belief."</p></blockquote><p>Rick Santorum teed off on a venerated former president Sunday morning for telling America that the separation of church and state was "absolute.." Was it the guy responsible for the above quote? <a href="http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/RR10_26_84.html">No, that was Ronald Reagan, running for reelection in 1984</a> (h/t BB).</p><p>It's Democrat John F. Kennedy who made Santorum "throw up," the GOP presidential contender told ABC's George Stephanopoulos, with his famous 1960 speech to Baptist ministers trying to assuage widespread fears about his Catholicism in order to become our first, and still our only, Catholic president. Santorum claims that JFK said that "people of faith have no role in the public square," and urged ABC's viewers to go read the speech for themselves and see.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/santorums_jfk_story_makes_me_want_to_throw_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/26/santorums_jfk_story_makes_me_want_to_throw_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New book shows another side to Jackie Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/us_books_jacqueline_kennedy_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/us_books_jacqueline_kennedy_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/09/12/us_books_jacqueline_kennedy_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former first lady's long-sealed 1964 conversations with Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. will be published this week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a side of Jacqueline Kennedy only friends and family knew.</p><p>Funny and inquisitive, canny and cutting. In "Jacqueline Kennedy: Historic Conversations on Life with John F. Kennedy," the former first lady was not yet the jet setting celebrity of the late 1960s or the literary editor of the 1970s and '80s. But she was also nothing like the soft-spoken fashion icon of the three previous years. She was in her mid-30s, recently widowed, but dry-eyed and determined to set down her thoughts for history.</p><p>Kennedy met with historian and former White House aide Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. in her 18th century Washington house in the spring and early summer of 1964. At home and at ease, as if receiving a guest for afternoon tea, she chatted about her husband and their time in the White House. The young Kennedy children, Caroline and John Jr., occasionally pop in. On the accompanying audio discs, you can hear the shake of ice inside a drinking glass. The tapes were to be sealed for decades and were among the last documents of her private thoughts. She never wrote a memoir and became a legend in part because of what we didn't know.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/us_books_jacqueline_kennedy_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/12/us_books_jacqueline_kennedy_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief history of controversial presidential vacations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama's not the first one to be criticized for taking some time off from running the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/08/11/obama-vacation-pundits-say-no-way.html">is catching a lot of flak for planning a summer vacation.</a> The president will spend 11 days in Martha's Vineyard, and critics say that's a bad idea when markets are skittish and millions of Americans are out of work or struggling to get by. Of course, Republicans criticizing Obama are just mirroring what Democrats said about President George W. Bush, who, at this point in his presidency, had taken <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/obama-61-bush-180-clinton-26-the-never-ending-presidential-vacation-debate/2011/08/18/gIQARrBoNJ_blog.html">180 "days off"</a> to <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/markknoller/status/104162519144341504">Obama's 61.</a></p><p>Partisan wrangling over presidential vacation time is as old as the Republic itself. The Salon.com War Room Historical Fun Fact Team did some research, and found out what sort of grief past presidents got when they wanted to recharge their batteries:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/true_facts_presidential_vacations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coverup continues: The Kennedys in Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/kennedys_in_hollywood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/kennedys_in_hollywood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/01/kennedys_in_hollywood</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Kennedys" miniseries is the latest proof tinseltown just can't handle the truth. I should know]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it lasted a mere 1,000 days, the Kennedy presidency has been entombed under 1,000 layers of junk history. Now -- with the 50th anniversary of JFK's brief reign upon us, and the half-century mark coming up on his 1963 assassination -- we will soon be neck deep in Kennedy sludge. A flurry of Kennedy projects are in various stages of production in Hollywood, which has long been dazzled by the family's glamour. But none of them promises to go beneath the surface and capture the deeper essence of their tragic story. When it comes to the Kennedys, Hollywood still can't handle the truth.</p><p>The first Camelot drama out of the chute is "The Kennedys," the controversial miniseries that was canceled by the History Channel under pressure from Carolyn Kennedy and historians, who argued that the channel should at least make some effort to root the story in, well, history. This was a quaint argument, since the History Channel abandoned history long ago in favor of ice-road truckers, gator wrestlers and other reality sideshows. But the network owners were sufficiently embarrassed by the ruckus to dump the series. "The Kennedys" then took a long, downward trip through television's alimentary canal, ending up in some dark cavity called the Reelz Channel. The six-episode series begins plopping out on Sunday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/kennedys_in_hollywood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/kennedys_in_hollywood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New video provides rare glimpse into John F. Kennedy&#8217;s final hours</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/kennedy_film_night_before_assassination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/kennedy_film_night_before_assassination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/22/kennedy_film_night_before_assassination</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Dallas museum released the clip showing an animated President Kennedy on the last night of his life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sixth Floor Museum in Dallas recently <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2011/02/22/rare-footage-captures-john-f-kennedy-on-his-last-night-alive/">released</a> a video of John F. Kennedy filmed on Nov. 21, 1963 -- the night before he was assassinated. The images were recorded at the Rice Hotel in Houston, where the President appeared at an event with local Hispanic leaders. The sadly audio-free clip shows an animated Kennedy with his wife, Jacqueline, as he approaches a podium to deliver remarks.</p><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapruder_film">Zapruder film</a>, this is not. (Thankfully.) Rather, it's a fascinating and melancholy look at an American icon during his last hours.</p><p>     <object height="278" width="440"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jQlw-U8l6YY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="278" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jQlw-U8l6YY?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="440"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/kennedy_film_night_before_assassination/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/kennedy_film_night_before_assassination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we admire a president who did so little?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/jfk_dallek_anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/jfk_dallek_anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/20/jfk_dallek_anniversary</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A presidency that was marked by stalled domestic initiatives, and that ended in tragedy, began 50 years ago today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year since 1990, the Gallup poll has asked Americans to assess all the presidents since John F. Kennedy. And every year, Kennedy comes out on top. In the most recent survey measuring the popularity of the nine presidents since JFK, 85 percent said they approved of Kennedy&#8217;s leadership; Ronald Reagan was second with a 74 percent rating. Predictably, Richard Nixon came last with only 29 percent; even George W. Bush, who rivaled Nixon for the dubious distinction of least popular, commanded 47 percent approval. And poor Lyndon Johnson, who did more to change the country for the better with his civil rights, Medicare and aid to education laws than any president since Franklin Roosevelt but who remains burdened by Vietnam, stood just ahead of Bush with 49 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/jfk_dallek_anniversary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/jfk_dallek_anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sargent Shriver dead at 95</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/sargent_shriver_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/sargent_shriver_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/18/sargent_shriver_dead</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Father of Maria Shriver and brother-in-law to President John F. Kennedy won the Presidential Medal of Freedom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Father of Maria Shriver and brother-in-law to President John F. Kennedy has died in Maryland, AP reports. Shriver was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 2003.</p><p>He served as the director of the Peace Corps and was George McGovern's running mate in the 1972 presidential elections.</p><p>USA Today has published <a href="http://stage.mps.beta.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/18/baby_doc_haiti/index.html?VERSION=">an obituary</a> of Shriver's life, highlighting his record of public service despite never winning an election to political office.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/sargent_shriver_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/sargent_shriver_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JFK ambulance up for auction in Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/us_jfk_ambulance_auction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/us_jfk_ambulance_auction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/07/us_jfk_ambulance_auction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 1963 Pontiac Bonneville Ambulance that transported Kennedy's casket to the hospital is for sale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bidders at an Arizona car auction will have a chance to buy the ambulance that carried the body of President John F. Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963, after it arrived in the Washington area from Dallas.</p><p>The Barrett-Jackson Auction Co. in Scottsdale says the 1963 Pontiac Bonneville Naval Ambulance transported Kennedy's casket from Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base to Bethesda Naval Hospital in Maryland.</p><p>The same ambulance was used to move Kennedy's casket, along with the late president's wife and brother Robert, to the U.S. Capitol Building.</p><p>Many watching grainy black and white images that November day saw Jackie Kennedy, with her blood stained clothing, enter the ambulance.</p><p>The auction runs Jan. 17-23.</p><p>------</p><p>Online:</p><p>     <a href="http://bit.ly/dOHqOy">http://bit.ly/dOHqOy</a>   </p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/us_jfk_ambulance_auction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/us_jfk_ambulance_auction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>