<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > John Galt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/john_galt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Kluwe: Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s wrong with Ayn Rand, libertarians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/chris_kluwe_heres_whats_wrong_with_ayn_rand_libertarians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/chris_kluwe_heres_whats_wrong_with_ayn_rand_libertarians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris kluwe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Galt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A world full of Ayn Rands would be a terrifyingly selfish place, writes the outspoken NFL star in his new book]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I forced myself to read "Atlas Shrugged." Apparently I harbor masochistic tendencies; it was a long, hard slog, and by the end I felt as if Ayn Rand had violently beaten me about the head and shoulders with words. I feel I would be doing all of you a disservice (especially those who think Rand is really super-duper awesome) if I didn’t share some thoughts on this weighty tome.</p><p>Who is John Galt?</p><p>John Galt (as written in said novel) is a deeply flawed, sociopathic ideal of the perfect human. John Galt does not recognize the societal structure surrounding him that allows him to exist. John Galt, to be frank, is a turd.</p><p>However, John Galt is also very close to greatness. The only thing he is missing, the only thing Ayn Rand forgot to take into account when writing "Atlas Shrugged," is empathy.</p><p>John Galt talks about intelligence and education without discussing who will pay for the schools, who will teach the teachers. John Galt has no thought for his children, or their children, or what kind of world they will have to occupy when the mines run out and the streams dry up. John Galt expects an army to protect him but has no concern about how it’s funded or staffed. John Galt spends his time in a valley where no disasters occur, no accidents happen, and no real life takes place.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/chris_kluwe_heres_whats_wrong_with_ayn_rand_libertarians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/chris_kluwe_heres_whats_wrong_with_ayn_rand_libertarians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>789</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happened to Orson Scott Card?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/end_game_for_orson_scott_card_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/end_game_for_orson_scott_card_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pajiba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orson Scott Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ender's Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Galt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For loyal science fiction fans, the author's slow descent into poisonous politics has been nothing short of tragic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pajiba.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/02/pajiba_mockadroll_large.jpg" alt="Pajiba" /></a> When I was twelve years old, I read <em>Ender’s Game</em> and had my mind blown. This was an author that not only understood children, but understood <em>smart</em> children. In stories, children tend to be presented as either miniature adults, or some sort of mentally disabled version of human beings. Card blew those tropes out of the water with children who fight, die, bond, and think, while still retaining the vestiges of childhood that render their decisions often inexplicable to adults. And that’s the key to why these characters, of Ender and Peter and Valentine, still pop off the page almost thirty years later.</p><p>I have an almost infinite number of books that I recommend people to read at one point or another, but <em>Ender’s Game</em> is on that very short list of novels that I feel is truly universal. Every aspect of the novel revolves around a nuanced exploration of what empathy really is and why it matters. From Peter’s use of empathy as a weapon, to Valentine’s uncontrollable sympathy for those around her, to Ender’s devastating tension between the two. This is a novel for those who think and feel too deeply.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/end_game_for_orson_scott_card_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/end_game_for_orson_scott_card_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>197</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>