<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > John Murtha, D-Pa.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/john_murtha_d_pa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New FBI documents detail Murtha&#8217;s role in Abscam</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/us_murtha_fbi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/us_murtha_fbi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/05/25/us_murtha_fbi</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Videotape shows the congressman being asked for help in gaining permanent resident status for an Arab sheik]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newly released FBI documents on Monday detailed the role of the late Rep. John Murtha in the Abscam scandal, the law enforcement sting that damaged the congressman's reputation early in his political career.</p><p>The documents on the FBI's 3-decade-old investigation state that "during the course of the operations, Abscam has developed prosecutive federal cases against" 15 people, including Murtha.</p><p>The Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania was never charged, but the government named him as an unindicted coconspirator. He testified against two other congressmen.</p><p>FBI agents captured Murtha on videotape turning down a $50,000 bribe offer, while holding out the possibility that he might take money in the future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/us_murtha_fbi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/us_murtha_fbi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the GOP&#8217;s special election jinx live on?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/republican_special_election_futility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/republican_special_election_futility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Massa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Numerologist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/the_numerologist/2010/03/11/republican_special_election_futility</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Massa's fall hands Republicans a golden opportunity to pick up a House seat. History says they'll blow it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Rep. Eric Massa's resignation should trigger a special election in his district. This will make for a prime pickup opportunity for Republicans, since John McCain actually carried New York&#8217;s 29th District over Barack Obama in 2008. And Massa&#8217;s is only one of three Democratic-held seats that Republicans -- at least on paper -- should, in the coming months, have a decent chance of claiming in special elections.</p><p>But recent history suggests they shouldn&#8217;t get too excited.</p><p>Believe it or not, it&#8217;s been almost nine years since the GOP picked up a previously Democratic-held House seat through a special election. Democrats, by contrast, have won six GOP-held seats in special elections in that time. And it&#8217;s not as if the Democrats were picking off low-hanging fruit: All but one of those victories came in districts that vote reliably for Republicans at the presidential level.</p><p>There are several reasons for the Democrats&#8217; special election success. The most obvious is that many of the pickups came when George W. Bush&#8217;s popularity was at its lowest and voters were eager to take out their frustrations on Republican candidates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/republican_special_election_futility/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/11/republican_special_election_futility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The race is on for Murtha&#8217;s seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/murtha_seat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/murtha_seat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/02/09/murtha_seat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An intriguing name on the Democratic side. And fears of a repeat of NY-23 for Republicans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Murtha's death Monday has Democrats and Republicans scrambling to find candidates for a special election in the ultimate swing House district -- Pennsylvania's 12th, the only one in the nation that voted for John Kerry in 2004 and John McCain in 2008.</p><p>Funeral arrangements haven't been finalized yet for Murtha, the longest-serving House member in Pennsylvania history, and few political operatives would talk on the record about exactly how to replace him, out of respect for a local legend. But each party is looking at a few names for an election where insiders -- not primary voters -- will pick the candidates.</p><p>On the Democratic side, talk is focusing on former Lieutenant Gov. Mark Singel, of Johnstown, Pa.; state Sen. John Wozniak, who has represented the area in Harrisburg since winning a state House seat in 1980; Murtha's chief of staff, John Hugya; and possibly his son, John M. Murtha.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/murtha_seat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/murtha_seat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. John Murtha dies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/murtha_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/murtha_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/02/08/murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pennsylvania Democrat helped make Nancy Pelosi House speaker and pushed for an early end to the war in Iraq]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. John Murtha, a Democratic defense hawk whose transformation to a dove over the war in Iraq helped the party surge back to power during the Bush administration, died Monday at Virginia Hospital Center from complications of gallbladder surgery. He was 77.</p><p>Murtha -- who became the longest-serving House member in Pennsylvania history on Saturday, after 19 terms in Congress -- was one of the masters of legislative negotiations and backroom dealing, and his support in 2006 helped make Nancy Pelosi the first woman speaker of the House. Pelosi, in turn, backed Murtha in his losing race against Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., to be the House majority leader.</p><p>For years, Murtha steered billions of dollars in federal projects to military contractors in his district near Johnstown, Pa., and he supported big defense budgets from his perch on the House committee that oversaw Pentagon spending. He was one of the proudest practitioners of congressional "earmarking," dropping little grants that benefited his district into must-pass defense spending bills without a moment's hesitation or apology. (When President Obama pushed for a freeze on discretionary spending last month, Murtha laughed about it. "Well, he can call for it, but we're the guys who make the decision," the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/08/AR2010020802352_2.html?hpid=topnews">quoted him</a> as saying. "I always remind them of that.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/murtha_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/murtha_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murtha hospitalized, in intensive care</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/murtha_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/murtha_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/02/02/murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pennsylania Democrat reportedly suffering from complications related to gallbladder surgery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple outlets <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2010/02/02/2191897.aspx">are reporting</a> that Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., has been hospitalized, and is in intensive care.</p><p>The congressman had gallbladder surgery in December; his current hospitalization is reportedly due to complications from that.</p><p>A longtime veteran of the House, Murtha has been more prominent in recent years, ever since he came out to call for a withdrawal of American forces from Iraq. He's been having a rough go of it lately, though, as his ties to defense contractors and pork barrel habits in general have been earning him some close scrutiny.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/murtha_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/02/murtha_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paying for the war in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/24/afghanistan_cost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/24/afghanistan_cost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/11/24/afghanistan_cost</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of powerful House Democrats pushes for Congress to reckon with the costs of the U.S. presence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama&#8217;s agenda this year has involved a number of big-ticket items: the stimulus, some of the bailouts, healthcare and cap-and-trade. And though some -- or arguably, all -- of these will actually increase federal revenue in the long term, they clearly give the impression of the government handling a lot of money, which can sound an awful lot like &#8220;the government is blowing through wads of your cash.&#8221;</p><p>Unsurprisingly, then, being a deficit-hawk is back in vogue among Republicans. It&#8217;s been one of the GOP&#8217;s main lines of attack against, well, everything -- but particularly healthcare reform. One major policy debate, however, has managed to avoid any discussion of costs, even though the expenditures could total hundreds of billions of dollars, with little promise of return. That policy, of course, would be any escalation of the war in Afghanistan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/24/afghanistan_cost/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/24/afghanistan_cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds closing in on Blago, Murtha?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/08/blago_murtha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/08/blago_murtha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rod Blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/07/08/blago_murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key figures in separate investigations relating to the men have agreed to plea deals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing federal prosecutors are good at -- and really, they're good at many things -- it's getting the little fish in an investigation to plead guilty and flip. In this manner, way up the ladder until they've got enough to go after the big target. It seems like they might have just done that in two separate corruption cases, one the prosecution of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich and the other an investigation of defense contracting that may end up being related to Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.</p><p>Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney prosecuting Blagojevich, seems to have quite a bit on the former governor already. But he added substantially to his case when Blagojevich's old chief of staff, John Harris, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i_t_Y910UBkF_oq6DWC7RA_KYBcQD99AH4CG0">agreed to plead guilty</a> to a wire fraud charge. The plea agreement makes clear that Harris will be testifying against his former boss, and will likely play a big role in Blagojevich's trial.</p><p>Separately, prosecutors in Pennsylvania <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/07/AR2009070701129.html?wprss=rss_politics">got a plea agreement</a> from Richard Ianeri, the former president of a defense contractor with close ties to Murtha. Federal prosecutors are <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/02/11/murtha/index.html">already looking into</a> a lobbying firm that was run by a former top aide of the congressman's, and investigating the possibility that the company directed bogus contributions to him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/08/blago_murtha/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/08/blago_murtha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murtha&#8217;s not the only one with lobbyist trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/19/pma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/19/pma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/02/19/pma</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Together, 104 members of the House secured about $300 million for the clients of a lobbying firm now under FBI investigation -- most got campaign cash in the process. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Life for veteran Congressman John Murtha (D-Pa.) got a whole lot worse <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/02/11/murtha/index.html">recently</a>, but at least now he's got some company in the doldrums.</p><p>Congressional Quarterly reports that 104 members of the House (54 Democrats and 50 Republicans) combined with a few senators to secure a total of roughly $300 million worth of earmarks for the clients of lobbying firm PMA, all of it in a single defense appropriations bill in 2008. That PMA connection is coming back to bite them, as the company --&#160; founded by Paul Magliochetti, a former top aide to Murtha -- is currently the subject of an FBI&#160;investigation. The Feds are looking into potentially illegal campaign contributions to Murtha and fellow Reps. Jim Moran (D-Va.) and Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.).</p><p>Of the 104 lawmakers, 91 received campaign donations, amounting to $1,815,138 overall since 2001, from PMA employees, associates, and the firm's political action committee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/19/pma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/19/pma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murtha in trouble over campaign contributions?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/12/murtha_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/12/murtha_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/02/11/murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal authorities are investigating a lobbying firm run by a former aide to the Pennsylvania Democrat; the company was one of his big donors. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It hasn't been a great few months for Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.).</p><p>During the election campaign last fall, the congressman got in trouble for saying his own district is in a "racist area." All of a sudden, he found himself in a real fight for re-election, and though he eventually pulled out a <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/11/04/murtha/">comfortable victory</a>, he needed to bring in a lot of new funding for his campaign in order to do so. Now, one of the sources he turned to for that money could land him in some hot water.</p><p>Federal prosecutors are currently looking at PMA Group, a lobbying shop founded by Paul Magliocchetti, a former top aide of Murtha's. And, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/us/politics/11inquire.html?partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">reports</a>, they're investigating the possibility that Magliocchetti may havc directed "bogus"&#160;contributions to Murtha and two other Democratic congressmen, Virginia's Jim Moran and Indiana's Pete Visclosky.</p><p>"In the first half of 2007, the PMA Group and its clients contributed more than $500,000" to the three men, the Times says. "The lawmakers, meanwhile, earmarked more than $100 million in defense spending for PMA clients in the appropriations bills for 2008."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/12/murtha_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/12/murtha_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last refuge of the scoundrel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/bush_defeatists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/bush_defeatists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 11:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//kamiya/2007/05/01/bush_defeatists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush is trying to convince the American people that Iraq is the WWII of our time, and Democrats are craven defeatists. Both claims are absurd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Bush administration and its supporters, the Democrats and a majority of the American people are a cross between Benedict Arnold, Neville Chamberlain and Tokyo Rose. What set the Bushites off was a one-two punch from the Democrats -- the bill that would require American troops to begin withdrawing from Iraq by Oct. 1, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's statement, "As long as we follow the president's path in Iraq, the war is lost." The words were barely out of Reid's mouth when the Bush dead-enders -- a peculiar group now consisting of less than a quarter of the American people, two GOP congressmen and two GOP senators -- began Googling "great traitors of history." Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0427/p01s02-uspo.html">called on Reid </a> to resign. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., <a href="http://www.thestate.com/372/story/46568.html"> said the spending bill</a> amounted to a "surrender" to al-Qaida. White House spokesperson <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/26/AR2007042601190_pf.html">Dana Perino said,</a> "Tonight, the House of Representatives votes for failure in Iraq, and the president will veto its bill." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/bush_defeatists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/01/bush_defeatists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Democrats can&#8217;t stop the surge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/18/iraq_vietnam_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/18/iraq_vietnam_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2007/01/18/iraq_vietnam</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a young House candidate in 1972, I learned just how little Congress can do to pull the plug on a war started by a president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Vietnam War raging in 1972, I ran for Congress as a militantly antiwar candidate. My signature issue -- and it was almost enough to propel me to victory in a Democratic primary -- was a flamboyant promise to "filibuster war appropriations." This was a passionate, although preposterous, pledge, since I knew at the time that House rules strictly barred delaying tactics like the filibuster. But as a 25-year-old graduate student, I was confident that my antiwar wiles could outwit age-old congressional procedures, if only the voters of Michigan possessed the wisdom to send me to Washington. </p><p>My memories of the home-front battles during the Vietnam War have shaped, in large measure, my skeptical reaction to the rising crescendo of congressional voices vowing legislative action to curtail George W. Bush's war plans in Iraq and to set a timetable for American withdrawal. The late 1960s and early 1970s demonstrated the ineptness of Congress at condemning a war it once condoned. So many legislative vehicles, so much anguished debate and so little to show for it before 1973, five years into the Nixon administration and nine years after Lyndon Johnson first escalated the war in 1964. Even when Richard Nixon announced the withdrawal of U.S. ground troops from Vietnam on March 23, 1973, he was not so much humbled by Congress as buoyed by the Paris peace agreement with Hanoi. "We have prevented the imposition of a Communist government by force on South Vietnam," he declared. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/01/18/iraq_vietnam_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/01/18/iraq_vietnam_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When cowards attack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/04/murtha_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/04/murtha_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2006/08/04/murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican brutality against Jack Murtha, especially by politicians who once praised him, highlights the GOP's desperation on Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a political operative of such skill and smarts, Karl Rove is surprisingly predictable. Since Rove entered the White House and took control of the Republican Party, there are two things he has done in every election. He goes directly after his adversary's greatest perceived strength -- and he reveals his game plan in advance. </p><p> As this year's midterm elections approach, threatening his party's majority in both houses and possibly leaving his boss the lamest of ducks, Rove remains on the same course he charted last winter. Indeed, he announced his plan of attack in January, when he told the Republican National Committee that the "failed resolve" of Democrats who seek to withdraw from Iraq is "worthy of public debate," and vowed that "this president and this party" would not allow America to "retreat before victory." </p><p> Around that time, Republican operatives began to set up Web sites and test themes that the party could use against the most formidable critic of the president's Iraq policy, and started to prepare the "Swift-boating" of Rep. John "Jack" Murtha, D-Pa., a highly decorated Marine veteran, once-enthusiastic supporter of the Iraq invasion, and one of the military's best friends on Capitol Hill -- who stunned the Bush administration in November 2005 when he called for a phased withdrawal from Iraq. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/08/04/murtha_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/08/04/murtha_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fleeing the battle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/02/murtha_irey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/02/murtha_irey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2006/06/02/murtha_irey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the invective it has spewed at the antiwar Jack Murtha, why isn't the GOP helping Diana Irey, his opponent in November?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last winter, Karl Rove <a target="new" href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/20/republicans.rove.ap">promised</a> his fellow Republicans that their party would win the congressional midterm election on the issues of war and national security. Perhaps he will still be proved right. But six months later, the White House political strategist and his party have backed away from confronting the most outspoken and credible Democratic critic of the Iraq war. </p><p> Despite all the invective fired at Rep. John Murtha, he is cruising toward reelection in his blue-collar southwestern Pennsylvania district without a serious challenge. (The socially conservative, pro-labor Democrat hasn't even bothered to put up a <a target="new" href="http://www.murtha.org">functioning campaign Web site</a> yet.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/06/02/murtha_irey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/06/02/murtha_irey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A smiley face for Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/03/06/iraq_151/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/03/06/iraq_151/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/03/06/iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff says things are going "very, very well." Does anyone still believe him?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On <a target= "new" href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11654734/">"Meet the Press"</a> Sunday, Tim Russert asked the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to describe how things were going in Iraq. "I'd say they're going well," Gen. Peter Pace responded. "I wouldn't put a great big smiley face on it, but I would say they're going very, very well from everything you look at." </p><p>Pace listed a couple of those "everythings" -- Iraqis are forming their own government, and there are more Iraqi battalions in the field now than there were a year ago -- but then made it clear that he was referring to the entirety of Iraq. "No matter where you look -- at their military, their police, their society -- things are much better this year than they were last," Pace said. </p><p>Really? </p><p>It's true that the Iraqis are trying to form a government; amid what the <a target= "new" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/iraq;_ylt=AiF0HGJ64RyDwR77h2vMEkms0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--">Associated Press</a> calls a "dangerous leadership vacuum," the Iraqi parliament will convene for the first time this month as Sunni and Kurdish leaders try to persuade the Shiite prime minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, to give up hopes for a new term. And it's true that there are more Iraqi battalions in the field than there used to be, but the United States considers fewer of them -- which is to say, <a target= "new" href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/24/iraq.security/index.html?section=cnn_topstories">not a single one of them</a> -- capable of fighting without help from U.S. troops. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/03/06/iraq_151/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/03/06/iraq_151/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission to be decided</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2005/12/09/withdrawal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that so many Americans -- even Democrats! -- seem to agree that we should withdraw from Iraq soon, it's time to figure out how.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class='wp-image-10048771' src='http://media.salon.com/2005/12/story_conason1.gif' />At a time when a majority of Americans are wondering why we invaded Iraq and worrying about the potential outcome of that conflict, Howard Dean said exactly the wrong thing the other day. By suggesting that the war "cannot be won" by our troops, the Democratic National Committee chairman provided President Bush with a badly needed distraction from his failing policies. His clumsy remark also served to highlight the divisions among congressional Democrats over the war and their difficulty in <a href="/news/feature/2005/12/09/withdrawal/index.html">formulating a plausible alternative,</a> and to isolate him from other party leaders who don't want to be associated with his remarks. </p><p> Although Dean now insists that he was quoted "a little out of context" -- and that in fact he believes "we have to win" the war -- his comment in San Antonio Monday offered every conservative pundit and Republican flack the perfect opportunity to portray Democrats as defeatists. Citizens across the political spectrum are well aware of the futility of the Bush strategy and the president's terrible mismanagement of the war, but their doubts about the likelihood of victory are not the same as admitting defeat. Talking about getting out requires very careful attention to national pride and honor, emotions that are easily subject to manipulation by the unscrupulous politicians in power. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we stay or should we go?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/12/09/withdrawal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprisingly, a bipartisan consensus is emerging for bringing home our exhausted troops, yet President Bush clings to his chimera of total victory. Inside the escalating debate over Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One evening late in February of 2003, a few weeks before the United States launched its first strike on Baghdad, George W. Bush gave a speech to the nation explaining the many great and good reasons to oust Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. The president's <a target="new" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030226-11.html">address</a> was typically defiant and certain; hindsight tells us it was also almost entirely wrong. Bush's key rhetorical points -- on Saddam's dangerous arsenal, his links with terrorist groups, and the speed with which the U.S. would rebuild Iraq in the aftermath of war -- now sound almost embarrassingly outdated, like the refrain from a 1980s one-hit wonder. </p><p> Yet one aspect of Bush's 2003 speech -- his explanation for how long the U.S. would occupy Iraq -- is strangely current even today. "We will remain in Iraq as long as necessary, and not a day more," Bush told the nation that night. Almost three years later, despite all that's gone wrong in Iraq, this vague stance -- staying in Iraq as long as Bush considers it necessary -- still remains the administration's policy for determining how and when to end the war. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/09/withdrawal_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The only way out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/03/iraq_plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/03/iraq_plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2005/12/03/iraq_plans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the plans the Democrats have offered on Iraq rely on wishful thinking. Here's one that might actually work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class='wp-image-10047602' src='http://media.salon.com/2005/12/story_conason.gif' />House Democrats want a "timetable" for American withdrawal from Iraq. Senate Democrats want a "year of progress" on Iraq. Senate Republicans want quarterly progress reports about Iraq. The White House offers a glossy brochure and a Web site as the U.S. "plan for victory" in Iraq. </p><p>No wonder the American people -- who know that the president has lied to them repeatedly about this costly bloodshed -- have lost faith in George W. Bush, his party and his war, without gaining confidence in the opposition. Both sides are squandering the opportunity for a decent, honorable and constructive conclusion to the war because they will not face the realities honestly. </p><p>The president's <a target="new" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/11/20051130-2.html">recent speech</a> on the war continued his execrable record of mendacity, especially with his exaggerated claims about the Iraqi role in the battle of Tal Afar and his insistence that the Iraqi armed forces are well on the way to independence. Two months ago, his own commanding officer, Gen. John Abizaid, testified in the Senate that after two years of supposed training, only one of a hundred Iraqi battalions is capable of operating on its own. One of a hundred! If the general spoke truthfully, how many decades would the Iraqis need before they could operate alone? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/12/03/iraq_plans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/12/03/iraq_plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh on Murtha: A &#8220;useful idiot&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/murtha_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/murtha_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/11/23/murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somebody forgot to give Rush the talking points.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As George W. Bush and Dick Cheney slipped into the "love the sinner, hate the sin" mode on Jack Murtha over the weekend, somebody forgot to get the talking points to Rush Limbaugh. On his show Monday, Limbaugh dismissed Murtha -- a Vietnam veteran who spent 37 years in the Marine Corps -- as the "useful idiot of the moment." </p><p>"Murtha's irrelevant in all this," Limbaugh said, according to a transcript posted by <a target="new" href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200511220011">Media Matters</a>. "This is about our troops and our national security. Murtha's just getting his 15 minutes of fame like Cindy Sheehan got, and like Bill Burkett got ... the Jersey Girls, Richard Clarke, Joseph Wilson, you name it -- just the latest member of the endless parade of personalities around whom the Democrats can circle and support. " </p><p>Whoa there, Rushbo. The story that you're supposed to be spinning is that <i>even the Democrats</i> don't support Murtha's plan for Iraq. That was the whole point of the Republicans' parliamentary exercise Friday night. They threw before the House a resolution proclaiming that the "deployment of United States forces in Iraq" should be "terminated immediately." And when virtually everyone voted against it, all the Republican talking heads could proclaim that nobody in Congress thinks like Murtha does. "We had Democrats and Republicans alike pressing that button, saying basically, 'Don't pull out,'" Jean "I called him a 'coward' but I didn't mean to imply that he was a coward" Schmidt explained in a statement yesterday. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/murtha_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/murtha_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jean Schmidt, victim</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/schmidt_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/schmidt_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/11/23/schmidt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ohio Republican who smeared Jack Murtha says that she has been made a scapegoat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it turns out that we were <a href="/politics/war_room/2005/11/22/schmidt/index.html">all wrong</a> about Jean Schmidt. The Ohio Republican isn't a coward. She's a victim! </p><p>"I am amazed at what a national story this has become," Schmidt said in a statement Monday after dodging the press for a couple of days. "I have been attacked very personally, continuously, since Friday evening." </p><p>Of course, one might say that Schmidt has been attacked because she attacked. On the House floor Friday night, Schmidt said she had just spoken with a constituent back in Ohio. "He asked me to send Congress a message: Stay the course. He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message: that cowards cut and run, Marines never do." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/schmidt_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/schmidt_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s the &#8220;coward&#8221; now?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/22/schmidt_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/22/schmidt_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/11/22/schmidt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohio Rep. Jean Schmidt dodges the press and the public as the fallout over her smear continues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's that you were saying about "cowards," Jean Schmidt? </p><p>The <a target= "new" href="http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051122/NEWS01/511220354">Cincinnati Post</a> is reporting that the Republican representative from Ohio won't talk to reporters about her decision to smear Pennsylvania Rep. Jack Murtha on the House floor last week, and the <a target= "new" href="http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051122/NEWS01/511220352/1020">Cincinnati Enquirer</a> says she skipped two previously scheduled public appearances yesterday. </p><p>Who can blame her, really? Four days after she strapped on her nicest red, white and blue sweater and suggested that a 37-year veteran of the Marine Corps is a "coward" who wants to "cut and run" from Iraq, Schmidt is under attack from <a target= "new" href="http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051122/EDIT01/511220301/1020/EDIT">editorial writers<a/> and <a target= "new" href="http://movies.crooksandliars.com/nbc_snl_sppof_bush_war_speech_051119a.mov">comedians</a> alike. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/11/22/schmidt_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/22/schmidt_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://movies.crooksandliars.com/nbc_snl_sppof_bush_war_speech_051119a.mov" length="0" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

