<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > JOhns Hopkins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/johns_hopkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Read our salon: Should the U.S. intervene in Syria?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/a_salon_should_the_u_s_intervene_in_syria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/a_salon_should_the_u_s_intervene_in_syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real-time Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOhns Hopkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two experts debated the most responsible U.S. response to reports Syria may have used chemical weapons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reports that Syria may have engaged in the use of chemical weapons have sparked debate as to whether such activity crosses a "red line" and warrants U.S. intervention. As politicians across the world prescribe courses of action --  Israel and England have <a href="http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/26/17926504-israel-urges-us-action-over-syrian-chemical-weapons?lite">just weighed in</a> -- we asked two experts with divergent views to discuss the issue with us — and you.</p><p><strong>Lina Khatib</strong>, the Head of the Program on Arab Reform and Democracy at Stanford University has argued <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/04/the-case-for-intervening-in-syria/275299/">for U.S. intervention</a>. <strong>Daniel Serwer</strong>, Senior Fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations, at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, has called for evaluating the issue <a href="http://www.peacefare.net/?p=14612">in a broader context</a>. At <strong>11:15 a.m. ET</strong>, they’ll engage in a back-and-forth right here in a real-time Salon. Submit your own thoughts in the comments section, and we’ll do our best to bring you in on the discussion, too.</p><p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://embed-script.branch.com/assets/embed/embed.m.js?body=0" data-branch-embedid="LN9UGwqLoDs"></script></p><p><noscript>&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;a href="http://branch.com/b/syria-6"&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;Syria&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;lt;/a&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;gt;</noscript><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/a_salon_should_the_u_s_intervene_in_syria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/a_salon_should_the_u_s_intervene_in_syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johns Hopkins grants antiabortion group official status as campus organization</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/johns_hopkins_grants_anti_abortion_group_official_status_as_a_campus_organization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/johns_hopkins_grants_anti_abortion_group_official_status_as_a_campus_organization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOhns Hopkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The group will continue to conduct "sidewalk interference" outside of clinics, now with possible university funding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After previously being denied by the Student Government Association's Senate, an antiabortion group at Johns Hopkins University has been granted official status as a campus organization and will continue to conduct "sidewalk interference" sessions outside clinics, now with possible university funding.</p><p>Johns Hopkins announced on Wednesday that the Student Government Association's Judiciary Committee unanimously voted to overturn the earlier decision and grant the group official privileges, such as listings in all university publications and websites and on-campus fundraising opportunities.</p><p>The committee's decision coincided with a visit to Johns Hopkins from former Sen. Rick Santorum, who <a href="http://www.jhunewsletter.com/2013/04/10/senator-rick-santorum-provokes-political-discourse-among-students-46078/" target="_blank">told</a> students: "The vast majority of people who are pro-life are pro-life because they know something scientifically."</p><p>Santorum's faith in science only went so far, as he went on to remark that many scientific journals have been "discredited" on climate change: “The bottom line is in the last 15 years the earth is not warm,” Santorum said. “The warmest year was 1998. We have not seen any warming since then. This was somehow lost on the people in this room.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/johns_hopkins_grants_anti_abortion_group_official_status_as_a_campus_organization/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/johns_hopkins_grants_anti_abortion_group_official_status_as_a_campus_organization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are frat boys the new conservatives?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/are_frat_boys_the_new_conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/are_frat_boys_the_new_conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JOhns Hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraternity life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Horowitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Review asks the wrong question about Greek life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s long been a conservative truism that universities are enemy territory, stacked as they are with sandal wearing humanities professors and scientists whose research depends on empirical reality. But the ivory tower has probably never been as liberal as the right wants to believe: 51% of college graduates and 42% of “postgraduates” <a href="http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/race/president">voted for Mitt Romney</a>.</p><p>Even so, the academy’s supposedly implacable hostility to conservatives has been a career boosting foil for rightists from<a href="http://www.amazon.com/God-Man-Yale-Superstitions-Academic/dp/089526692X/saloncom08-20"> William F. Buckley</a> to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/One-Party-Classroom-Professors-Indoctrinate-Undermine/dp/0307452557/saloncom08-20">David Horowitz</a>. But writing in Buckley’s <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/338142/are-frat-brothers-natural-conservatives-betsy-woodruff?pg=1">National Review</a> this weekend, Betsy Woodruff sees an emerging trend that could help level politics in the quad: Frat boys!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/are_frat_boys_the_new_conservatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/are_frat_boys_the_new_conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
