Jonathan Lethem

Girl in Landscape

  • more
    • All Share Services

When we were little kids and our parents and teachers urged us to flex our imagination, they thought they were doing us a favor — and they were, under cover of daylight. But where were they after dark, when we’d lie stone awake and frozen with fear in our beds after we’d read one of Ray Bradbury’s alien-spores-in-the-basement stories, under the covers with the flashlight, or taken a “Twilight Zone” episode much too close to heart? When we reached adulthood, we convinced ourselves those fears were just silly: The “Twilight Zone” sets were cheesy, and Bradbury turned out to be not nearly as scary as Richard Nixon.<BR

But Jonathan Lethem is the kind of writer who reassures us that none of those nights were spent in vain: We had plenty to fear — we just needed those stories because they gave us something to hook our terror onto. “Girl in Landscape” — which could be called science fiction for those who like that sort of thing, although it shouldn’t scare off those who don’t — uses the raw materials of those fears (mysterious viruses that change our perceptions; dry, spooky terrain that looks like nothing so much as nightmare territory; tiny, slimy creatures that grow inside of potatoes) as a way of exploring both the awe of female adolescent sexual awakening and the treachery of it.

Pella Marsh is 13 when her mother dies and her family — including her ineffectual, failed-politician father, Clement, and her two younger brothers — leave the apocalyptic wasteland of Brooklyn and strike out for a better life on the planet of the Archbuilders. The Archbuilders — double-jointed creatures with bodies of fur, shell and leathery skin — had once built a great civilization but have since fallen into a kind of lethargy. Their planet is a parched wonderland of crumbled towers and archways, a place where tiny giraffelike creatures called household deer skitter and scamper across the plains and in the corners of people’s houses, like mice. Among the small group of settlers on the planet is Efram Nugent — a loner, a bully and an enigmatic presence who acts as if he knows everything and sometimes really seems to. (The character clearly resembles Ethan Edwards, John Wayne’s vengeful, nearly unhinged character in “The Searchers.”) Pella is both attracted to and repelled by Efram. To her, he represents a jumble of conflicts: He’s an arbiter of order in this strange new world, an idiot grown-up who doesn’t know as much as he thinks he does and a lightning rod for both her sexual bewilderment and her half-conscious sense of her own allure.

Lethem tells Pella’s story with the same lucidity and unaffected elegance he brought to his 1997 novel “As She Climbed Across the Table.” And if he’s unflinching about probing the dark side of Pella’s transformation, he’s also almost painfully sympathetic to her, capturing the awkwardness a young woman feels when she’s getting ready to fold up her girl self forever: “She moved toward her father, slowly, giving him time to catch the hint. He sat just in time, and she climbed into his lap. She didn’t really fit there, but she drew up her knees and pretended. It was strange how Efram had mistaken her for a grown woman even as he towered over her, made her feel small. Whereas Clement, with whom she was still unquestionably a child, was nearly her same size.” And even when Lethem uses the language of science fiction to shape his story, he doesn’t have to stretch to make his fantastic metaphors work. He knows adolescence is its own kind of weird tale, and if the fear of it wasn’t exactly what kept us awake all those childhood nights — well, maybe it should have been.

Stephanie Zacharek is a senior writer for Salon Arts & Entertainment.

Big bucks for old books

WITH THIS YEAR'S NATIONAL BOOK AWARD, CHARLES FRAZIER WINS -- AND SO DO BOOK COLLECTORS.

  • more
    • All Share Services

When Charles Frazier’s earthy, decidedly old-fashioned first novel “Cold Mountain” beat out Don DeLillo’s “Underworld” and three other books Tuesday night to win this year’s National Book Award for fiction, many in the book world expressed some mild shock and surprise. (Who is this bearded whippersnapper?) But not America’s book collectors. They’d been betting on Frazier all along.

From the moment “Cold Mountain” was released this spring, it has basked in the glow of almost-otherworldly buzz. Strong reviews and good word-of-mouth translated into sales, and Atlantic Monthly Press’ first printing — 25,000 copies — quickly vanished from bookstores. It’s impossible to know how many of those copies were snapped up by collectors who saw a good thing coming, but as early as this summer antiquarian booksellers began advertising signed copies for $50, then for $75, then for $100.

When one bookseller recently tried to pass along a signed first edition of “Cold Mountain” for $150, Robin H. Smiley, the publisher of a monthly book collector’s magazine called Firsts, felt compelled to step in and dismiss some of the smoke — in much the same way that Alan Greenspan might try to soothe frazzled nerves after a particularly fevered day on Wall Street. “We are automatically skeptical about the long-term strength of new books at premium prices; time tends to bring them back to earth,” Smiley intones in the magazine’s November issue. “But it is always pleasant to have purchased such a book before it became a sensation.”

Nice try, Robin. Now that “Cold Mountain” has garnered what is arguably America’s most prestigious literary prize, that rumbling noise you hear is the sound of used booksellers rushing to jack up the penciled sticker price inside their few remaining copies. The stock of “Cold Mountain” can only soar.

The underground market in Charles Frazier first editions is indicative of the growing interest in book collecting in recent years. Americans love collectibles, and bookish Americans are apparently no exception. As each succeeding issue of Smiley’s Firsts magazine indicates, there is almost no writer too young (Elizabeth McCracken) or too minor (Rufus King) or too commercial (Michael Crichton) to be actively hoarded.

The price that these writers’ books can command has as much, if not more, to do with their rarity as it does with their literary value. What collectors generally seek out is a first edition copy of a writer’s first — not necessarily their best — book. Other things can help boost a book’s price: Is it in good condition? Is it signed? Was there a small first printing? Is there anything unusual about it, like maybe a copy of Jesse Jackson’s autobiography inscribed to David Duke?

The more obscure a writer’s first few books are, the more chance they have to become valuable to collectors once he or she becomes well-known. Take Cormac McCarthy, for example — a writer to whom Frazier is often compared. Until 1992, when McCarthy’s novel “All the Pretty Horses” won the National Book Award and propelled him into the acknowledged first rank of American novelists, copies of his earlier novels crowded used bookstore shelves and could be had for a couple of dollars. After “All the Pretty Horses,” that changed rapidly. First editions of McCarthy’s first novel, “Orchard Keeper” (1965), now sell for as much as $2,500.

The best gauge of what’s happening in the fickle used book market is Allen and Patricia Ahearn’s annual volume, “Collected Books” (Putnam), a reference book that is to active collectors what the Blue Book is to used car buyers — a virtual bible. The 1998 edition of “Collected Books” is just out, and it makes for fascinating reading. For one thing, it’s fun to check and see what early editions of various canonical — dare I say priceless? — works are currently worth on the open market. Got a first edition of “Paradise Lost” (London, 1667) kicking around the house? It’s trading for about $60,000. How about a second edition — the first is apparently lost — of “Don Quixote” (London, 1620)? According to the Ahearns, it’s worth roughly $15,000. Among this century’s great writers, a first edition of Ernest Hemingway’s first book, “Three Stories and Ten Poems” (Paris, 1923) sells for $20,000, while Flannery O’Connor’s more widely accessible “Wise Blood” (New York, 1952) can be had for a mere $2,000.

Another way to read “Collected Books,” however, is as a guide to the ever-fluctuating futures market in books by living writers. While there is no objective correlation between prices and literary worth, there is a sneakily subjective correlation. Collectors tend to have their fingers to the critical wind, gathering up books by the writers (and titles) that they think have the best shot at longevity — and ever-increasing value.

It’s interesting, for example, to note that of the five writers up for this year’s National Book Award in fiction — Frazier, DeLillo, Ward Just, Cynthia Ozick and Diane Johnson — only DeLillo and Ozick merit a mention in the new edition of “Collected Books.” A first edition of DeLillo’s first novel, “Americana” (1971), sells for $350; Ozick’s “Trust” (1966) goes for the same price.

Writers with broad and particularly rabid fan bases tend to do better, at least in the short run, than more literary writers. Pat Conroy’s first novel, “The Boo” (1970), is listed at $3,000; Sue Grafton’s “‘A’ is for Alibi” (1982) commands $1,250; and James Lee Burke’s “Half of Paradise” sells for $1,750. Contrast this with first books like Richard Ford’s “A Piece of My Heart” (1976, $350), Louise Erdrich’s “Jacklight” (1984, $250) and Oscar Hijuelos’ “Our House in the Last World” (1983, $150).

But First magazine’s Smiley, in a recent interview, pointed out the ways that popularity can backfire. “When ‘The Bridges of Madison County’ became popular,” she said, “first editions were selling for as much as $400 because there weren’t many of them. But then the word of mouth on the book just died. No one talks about it anymore, it’s not catalogued, it has simply dried up.”

“It’s a goofy market,” Smiley said. “Like any market, from bottle caps to vintage cars, the prices are entirely market-driven. Our first advice to collectors is: Collect what you love. And as in any investment, don’t use the rent money.”

Smiley also offered some prescient advice for those who will rush to hoard first editions of “Cold Mountain” now that it is a National Book Award winner. “Many prize-winning writers are now forgotten,” she said. “Louis Bromfield won the 1927 Pulitzer Prize for his novel ‘Early Autumn,’ but by his sixth book the critics turned on him. Now he’s forgotten.”

Smiley also feels that, in terms of collecting, a lot will be riding on Frazier’s second book. “When Pam Houston’s first book, ‘Cowboys Are My Weakness,’ came out, there was a small first printing and first editions were hot. But she hasn’t written another book, and the price of the first editions has stalled at around $75. Now it might be too late.”

While the annual edition of “Collected Books” tends to list only established authors, Smiley’s magazine often features advertisements for books by very young writers. A bookseller in San Jose, Calif., lists McCracken’s “Here’s Your Hat, What’s Your Hurry” (1993) for $100 and Edwidge Danticat’s “Krik? Krak!” (1995) for $60. A dealer in Boise, Idaho, offers both Rick Moody’s “Garden State” (1992) and Chris Offutt’s “Kentucky Straight” (1992) for $150. On the other hand, a first edition of Irvine Welsh’s “Trainspotting” (1993), originally published by a tiny London press, sells for $1,400.

For young writers, watching the prices of your books go up and down can be a queasy-making experience. “Writers are a twisted, paranoid lot under the best of circumstances,” says novelist Geoff Nicholson, author of “Footsucker” and “Bleeding London.” “But this can send you over the edge. Most writers will tell you they pay no attention to it — but how can you not be flattered to see that people are indeed collecting you?”

Jonathan Lethem, the author of such novels as “Gun, With Occasional Music” and “As She Climbed Across the Table,” is another young writer whose name has begun to appear on used booksellers’ lists. “I’m very happy to see my books there,” he says. “I didn’t feel fully like a writer until I saw my stuff in used bookstores and in collections.” Yet Lethem does sometimes worry about the attention: “They’re placing bets on me, as if I were a new company,” he says. “To see them disappointed would really be bruising.”

No one who loves books will be disappointed at the news that “Cold Mountain” took home the National Book Award last night — it’s a serious novel that deserves the attention. Whether those people who own one of the many signed first editions of “Cold Mountain” should rejoice is another question.

As Doris Lessing puts it in her new memoir, “A Walk in the Shade,” the booming interest in signed books has to peak soon. “A couple of summers ago,” Lessing writes, “there was a joke going around the Oxford students: ‘I have the only unsigned copy of …’”

Continue Reading Close

Dwight Garner is Salon's book review editor.

Girl In Landscape

Stephanie Zacharek reviews 'Girl in Landscape' by Jonathan Lethem.

  • more
    • All Share Services

recorded between 1957 and 1964, the anthology “Dizzy Talkin’” features Dizzy Gillespie’s experiments with what Verve calls “exotic rhythms.” They weren’t so exotic to Dizzy, who played the congas himself when he couldn’t afford to hire the likes of Chano Pozo or Candido to accompany his Afro-Cuban numbers, and who proclaimed in his autobiography, “I always had a feeling for Latin music.” It was a feeling that developed after he met Cuban trumpeter Mario Bauza in 1937 and that bore fruit as early as 1941, when the trumpeter wrote the jazz classic “Night in Tunisia.” A few years later he recorded the Afro-Cuban “Manteca” and George Russell’s “Cubano Be-Cubano Bop,” with its dialect chanting by Pozo. No one did more than Dizzy Gillespie to bring new rhythms into modern jazz.

He played them, and he played with them. I once heard Gillespie’s last pianist, Panamian Danilo Perez, ask why Gillespie didn’t bother to learn the “proper” ways of playing various Latin rhythms. But Gillespie had his own agenda. Pozo’s chanting was serious, virtually sacerdotal. Gillespie does a parody of those chants in his own invented dialect to introduce “Swing Low, Sweet Cadillac,” ending the chant with a barely audible “Your mama.” “Swing Low, Sweet Cadillac” ends with Gillespie’s famous proclamation, “Old Cadillacs never die; the finance company just fade ‘em away.” In the middle he plays the spiritual as a stomping blues. Dizzy was as interested in conflating genres as in finding new paths, and he never abandoned the blues or the swinging four-four rhythms he grew up with.

On “Dizzy Talkin’,” he rips through the early ’60s soul hit “Walk on the Wild Side” — nothing too exotic there — and plays several pieces written for him by Lalo Schifrin, as well as two of his own pieces and a pair by bebop pianist Mal Waldron. Dizzy himself never sounded better than in the ’50s and early ’60s. After the grandiose fanfares of his own “Kush,” he enters softly with a muted horn in what turns out to be a suggestive coda. He’s light-hearted on Joe Cuba’s “Bang, Bang,” and intensely virtuosic on “Theme from The Cool World.” Listening to an anthology like this, it is easy to forget that Gillespie manipulates rhythm brilliantly in every phrase he plays, delaying an entrance, landing on an unexpected note and holding it only to rush off in irregularly grouped spurts of notes. He’s not the only soloist here, of course: On “Cool World,” one hears enlivening choruses by the then-young Kenny Barron, and saxophonist James Moody is featured repeatedly. One warning about “Dizzy Talkin’”: It doesn’t contain the seemingly inevitable “Night in Tunisia” or “Manteca,” both of which can be found on another Polygram collection, “Compact Jazz” (Mercury).
Feb. 4, 1997

Continue Reading Close

Michael Ullman is a jazz writer and lecturer in the music department of Tufts University.

Page 4 of 4 in Jonathan Lethem