<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > J.R.R. Tolkien</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/jrr_tolkien/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;Game of Thrones&#8221; too white?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/is_game_of_thrones_too_white/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/is_game_of_thrones_too_white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12766651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fantasy fiction might have racial problems, but they're just a reflection of America's broader battles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Ser Jorah’s face grew thoughtful as their horses trod together down the godsway. “When I first went into exile, I looked at the Dothraki and saw half-naked barbarians, as wild as their horses. If you had asked me then, Princess, I should have told you that a thousand good knights would have no trouble putting to flight a hundred times as many Dothraki.”</em><br />
<em> </em></p><p><em>“But if I asked you now?”</em><br />
<em> </em></p><p><em>“Now,” the knight said, “I am less certain.” </em></p><p><em>-- George R.R. Martin, "A Game of Thrones"</em></p><p>Epic fantasy -- sprawling stories full of swords, castles, magic, kings and lots and lots of white people – is slowly finding its way into America's cultural mainstream. In the age of the anemic box office, Peter Jackson's films of J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy remain a gold standard of blockbusterdom – and his forthcoming version of "The Hobbit" will almost certainly follow suit. Newer writers like Brandon Sanderson and Patrick Rothfuss have sold hundreds of thousands of their "door-stopper" tomes of wizardry and courtly intrigue. And tonight, countless viewers will be glued to their sets for the return of what is arguably the hottest show on television, "Game of Thrones," HBO's adaptation of George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire fantasy novels.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/is_game_of_thrones_too_white/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/is_game_of_thrones_too_white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>245</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Tolkien were black</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10177605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[African-American writers are taking on a literary genre dominated by nostalgia for Medieval England]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the most visible exemplars of epic fantasy -- from J.R.R. Tolkien to such bestselling authors as George R.R. Martin and Robert Jordan -- a casual observer might assume that big, continent-spanning sagas with magic in them are always set in some imaginary variation on Medieval Britain. There may be swords and talismans of power and wizards and the occasional dragon, but there often aren't any black- or brown-skinned people, and those who do appear are decidedly peripheral; in "The Lord of the Rings," they all seem to work for the bad guys.</p><p>Our hypothetical casual observer might therefore also conclude that epic fantasy -- one of today's most popular genres -- would hold little interest for African-American readers and even less for African-American writers. But that observer would be dead wrong. One of the most celebrated new voices in epic fantasy is N.K. Jemisin, whose debut novel, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780316043922%26">"The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms,"</a> won the Locus Award for best first novel and nominations for seemingly every other speculative fiction prize under the sun. Another is David Anthony Durham, whose <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780385722520%26">Acacia Trilogy</a> has landed on countless best-of lists. Both authors recently published the concluding books in their trilogies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even more evidence &#8220;Candy Land&#8221; movie will be like &#8220;LOTR&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/candyland_lotr_berger_quotes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/candyland_lotr_berger_quotes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/06/03/candyland_lotr_berger_quotes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Film's writer confirms previous comments; admits to loving challenges, J.R.R. Tolkien, candy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the sweet world of nostalgic board games got a little bit more bloody. Glenn Berger, one of the writers for the upcoming "Candy Land"&#160; film, told Entertainment Weekly to "<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/05/24/candyland_lotr">envision it as Lord of the Rings, but set in a world of candy</a>."</p><p>While my first reaction was to send that idea to Yikers Island for a life sentence, Berger's bold vision grew on me. Think of how many jokes there are to be made here! Lord Licorice bellowing from the Cupcake Commons, "NONE SHALL PASS ... UNTIL THEY PICK A PURPLE CARD FROM THE TOP OF THE PILE!" And that's just from the top of my head! I&#160;could think of so many more jokes by the time the film actually came out.</p><p>So anyone who thought Berger was going to try to backpedal from that grandiose claim was badly mistaken. If anything, the writer wants audiences to know how committed he is to doing a J.R.R. Tolkien thing for the Hasbro game. Also, <a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/candyland-talk/#more-105046">how committed he is to candy</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/candyland_lotr_berger_quotes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/03/candyland_lotr_berger_quotes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Middle-earth according to Mordor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/last_ringbearer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/last_ringbearer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/02/15/last_ringbearer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A newly translated Russian novel retells Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" from the perspective of the bad guys]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As bad lots go, you can't get much worse than the hordes of Mordor from J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings." Led by an utterly evil disembodied entity who manifests himself as a gigantic, flaming, pitiless eye, and composed of loathsome orcs (or goblins), trolls and foreigners, Mordor's armies are ultimately defeated and wiped out by the virtuous and noble elves, dwarfs, ents and human beings -- aka the "free peoples" -- of Middle-earth. No one sheds a tear over Mordor's downfall, although the hobbit Sam Gamgee does spare a moment to wonder if a dead enemy soldier is truly evil or has simply been misguided or coerced into serving the dark lord Sauron.</p><p>Well, there's two sides to every story, or to quote a less banal maxim, history is written by the winners. That's the philosophy behind "The Last Ringbearer," a novel set during and after the end of the War of the Ring (the climactic battle at the end of "The Lord of the Rings") and told from the point of view of the losers. The novel was written by Kirill Yeskov, a Russian paleontologist, and published to acclaim in his homeland in 1999. Translations of the book have also appeared in other European nations, but fear of the vigilant and litigious Tolkien estate has heretofore prevented its publication in English.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/last_ringbearer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/15/last_ringbearer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martin Freeman cast as Bilbo Baggins in &#8220;The Hobbit&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/martin_freeman_bilbo_baggins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/martin_freeman_bilbo_baggins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/trending/2010/10/22/martin_freeman_bilbo_baggins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director Peter Jackson says the star of Britain's "The Office" was born to play the role. Is he just blowing smoke?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/new-zealand-fight-hell-hobbit-32008">much maligned</a> "Lord of the Rings" prequel just got a little &#8230; funnier?</p><p>Director Peter Jackson announced yesterday that British actor Martin Freeman <a href="http://popwatch.ew.com/2010/10/21/the-hobbit-martin-freeman-to-play-bilbo/">will play the lead role</a> of Bilbo Baggins. Freeman is best known to Americans for playing Tim Canterbury in the British version of "The Office." The character Tim, a mild-mannered salesman who is drolly aware of his job's pointlessness, is the U.K. version of Jim Halpert.</p><p>Freeman, at the very least, looks the part of Bilbo: boyish, unassuming, short with a decidedly British expression. "Hobbit" fans, however, wonder if Freeman can carry a dramatic movie. He was at ease starring in the underrated <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/04/29/hitchhikers_guide/index.html">"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"</a> and he proved more than capable with short cameos in "Shaun of the Dead," <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/04/20/hot_fuzz/index.html">"Hot Fuzz"</a> and "Love Actually." But those, like "The Office," are comedies. Falling in love with the receptionist is one thing; fighting off trolls, goblins and giant spiders is another.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/martin_freeman_bilbo_baggins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/martin_freeman_bilbo_baggins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Romantics&#8221;: A &#8220;Big Chill&#8221; for this decade?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Romantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cruise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/09/09/romantics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katie Holmes and Josh Duhamel make out and murmur Keats in this slight but intriguing ensemble wedding dramedy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.theromanticsmovie.com/">"The Romantics,"</a> a pleasantly lo-fi ensemble movie written, directed and produced by Galt Niederhoffer (and based on her own novel into the bargain), we've got the collision of two or maybe three achingly meaningful narrative and cinematic modes. It's a wedding movie! It's a country-house movie! (Arguably, the wedding-at-a-country-house movie, almost always set on the New England coast, is already its own genre.) It's one of those "Big Chill"-type reunion movies, where an entire generation -- or at least its richer, whiter, better-looking microcosm -- faces the fact that it's not as young as it used to be and that its dreams have, alas, turned to dust!</p><p>OK, I'm being mean, largely because "The Romantics" is a middling little movie that tries to trespass on Bergman-Renoir territory and simply isn't adroit enough to pull it off, and because in its weaker moments it's overheated and silly. Niederhoffer's title is meant to refer to her characters, whose collegiate clique took on the name thanks to their incestuous dating habits, but also to the Romantics in the English-lit, turn-of-the-19th-century sense. So we get Katie Holmes and Josh Duhamel, as the maid of honor and intended bridegroom, not merely snogging furiously out in the woods on the night before the wedding like a couple of soap opera characters, but also murmuring snatches of "Ode to a Nightingale" into each other's ears.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/10/romantics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Tarantino direct &#8220;The Hobbit&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/who_will_direct_hobbit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/who_will_direct_hobbit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/06/01/who_will_direct_hobbit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Guillermo del Toro no longer at the film's helm, we look at who might replace him -- and who should]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex/feature/2008/04/25/del_hobbit">Guillermo del Toro</a> told me four years ago, in an interview at Cannes after the premiere of <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2006/10/13/pans_labyrinth/">"Pan's Labyrinth":</a> "I don't like little guys and dragons, hairy feet, hobbits -- I've never been into that at all. I don't like sword and sorcery, I hate all that stuff."</p><p>Yes, consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, but maybe del Toro should have stuck with that view all along. Two years after rearranging his family life and career and putting about a dozen other films on hold to move to New Zealand and direct a two-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Hobbit" for Peter Jackson, del Toro has now officially quit the project. Or semi-officially but not quite totally quit the project; he's still listed as a co-writer, along with Jackson, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and whoever else is hanging around the production offices in Wellington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/who_will_direct_hobbit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/01/who_will_direct_hobbit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against LOTR: Scrubbing bubbles!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/against_lotr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/against_lotr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/01/06/against_lotr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haters speak: Jackson's trilogy is too long, too short, too racist, too slavish and takes too many liberties.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Responses to my <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/the_lord_of_the_rings/index.html?story=/ent/movies/film_salon/2010/01/05/lotr_wtf">original post</a> about how and why the critical reputation of Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy has fallen so far and so fast were divided fairly evenly between pro- and anti-LOTR factions. But while the lovers had a pretty consistent argument -- we think these are wonderful fantasy movies, and we don't care what the supposedly cool espresso-depresso crowd thinks -- the haters were all over the place.</p><p>This provokes me to milk the debate just a little longer, and also to save you the trouble of reading through almost 200 comments to find the juiciest McNuggets. To be clear, I'm genuinely not pimping any particular ideology. I enjoyed the films immensely, and wrote a rave about <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/movies/review/2003/12/17/return/index.html">"Return of the King"</a> for Salon at the time. But I can barely remember them today, feel unsure whether I'll ever watch them again, and still don't regret leaving them off my own personal <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/best_of_the_decade_20002009/index.html?story=/ent/movies/andrew_ohehir/2009/12/28/decade">decade-end list.</a> Then again, this isn't about my dumb-ass list, or <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2009/12/28/best_of_decade_movies_2009/index.html?source=rss&amp;aim=/ent/movies/feature">Stephanie Zacharek's,</a> or anybody else's; this was about the fact that when I reached out to 60 or 70 filmmakers, critics and bloggers I know, in search of entries for our <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/films_of_the_decade/">Films of the Decade</a> series, not one of them suggested Jackson's colossal trilogy as a personal favorite. So something's going on here, and these responses are helping me figure it out a little.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/against_lotr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/against_lotr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Lord of the Rings&#8221;: WTF happened?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/05/lotr_wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/05/lotr_wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lord of the Rings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/01/05/lotr_wtf</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Jackson's trilogy was embraced by critics and made a kazillion bucks. So where's the decade-end love?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week we received a fascinating letter here at Film Salon Towers (OK, it's more like a deep purple grotto) from Matt Burr, a reader in Austin, Texas. In between bites of excellent Tex-Mex and BBQ, Matt raised a question about Peter Jackson's <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_lord_of_the_rings/">"Lord of the Rings"</a> trilogy and all the recent decade-end lists, including our own <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/films_of_the_decade/">Films of the Decade</a> series. I realized it was a question that's been hovering, half-formed, in the back of my brain without quite expressing itself clearly.</p><blockquote>
<p>I just want to ask [Matt writes] if one of the Salon movie contributors would explain why the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy has been so disrespected by critics. Not just at Salon but also at Slate and in every list I have seen. This suggests that a negative critical consensus has formed about LOTR and I have to admit that that really surprises me. I consider LOTR one of the singular cinematic achievements in film history. But if not that, at least of the decade. And I think there was a time where some critics would have agreed with me. It seems that some sort of gestalt has changed while I wasn't looking.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/05/lotr_wtf/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/05/lotr_wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>225</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Films of the decade: &#8220;Meet the Robinsons&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/mendelson_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/mendelson_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2009/12/21/mendelson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heck, this isn't even the best animated movie of the decade, but I love it beyond reason]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I look at my list of favorites over the 2000s, I find it filled with movies that were warm and celebrated unexpected goodness, good deeds in a weary world -- to quote a famous chocolate maker. There was certainly a place for masterpieces of cynicism and despair (<a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/ent/movies/review/2002/04/12/frailty/index.html">"Frailty,"</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2006/10/20/the_prestige/">"The Prestige,"</a> <a href="http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2001/01/19/pledge/index.html">"The Pledge"</a>), but I found myself more impressed by those films that could wring emotion out of light rather than darkness. Be it the unwavering friendship of Sam as his friend Frodo descends into madness on <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_lord_of_the_rings/">their quest</a> to dispose of a cursed ring, young Akeelah remembering all of the people in her life who helped her train for the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000G1R394?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000G1R394">spelling bee</a>, or Penny Lane tricking Russell Hammond into visiting the home of the young journalist he betrayed so that he <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2009/12/13/cutler/">might make amends,</a> the moments that stood out were the ones that celebrated surprising decency.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/mendelson_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/21/mendelson_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Lovely Bones&#8221;: Be very afraid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/11/the_lovely_bones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/11/the_lovely_bones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Lovely Bones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2009/12/10/the_lovely_bones</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Director Peter Jackson turns Alice Sebold's poetic bestseller into a garish supernatural thriller]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are all sorts of ways to botch a book-into-film adaptation: A filmmaker can be too cavalier about changing an author's character conception or meaning, or he can be so slavishly respectful of those things that he fails to make a work that resonates cinematically. He can rely too heavily on the use of voice-over; he can miscast one actor, or every actor; he can simply fall down on the job of capturing the lyricism or muscle of a particular writer's prose, as plenty of great directors have done. Adaptation is an art, not a science, and it's a thankless job to boot: Not even the most graceful filmmaker can escape the carping of the "Movies are always inferior to the books they're based on" crowd.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/11/the_lovely_bones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/11/the_lovely_bones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critics&#8217; Picks: Magic for grown-ups</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/magicians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/magicians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critics' Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/critics_picks/2009/08/12/magicians</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Magicians" is a ravishing adult novel that shines a new light on the fantasy tales we read as kids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if its author, Lev Grossman, weren't a colleague and friend, I'd be fervently recommending <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FMagicians-Novel-Lev-Grossman%2Fdp%2F0670020559&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"The Magicians"</a> to any reader who fell under the spell of Narnia or Harry Potter as a child and looks back on it all with an adult's ambivalence.</p><p>It's the story of Quentin Coldwater, a glum teenage Brooklynite preparing for his first year of university, who finds himself enrolled instead in a secret college of magic. Like most of the other students at Brakebills, Quentin grew up on a series of children's novels about a magical land called Fillory, emblem of all the wonder he longs for but that seems forever out of reach. Could his long-denied dreams finally be coming true?</p><p>"The Magicians" is a grown-up's book, one that reflects on the sort of questions you never think to ask about fantasy narratives as a kid, such as: Is it such a good idea to meddle in the politics of a strange country you barely understand? Wouldn't magical powers drain much of the challenge -- and therefore the purpose -- out of life? If animals and trees could really talk, would they have anything especially interesting to say?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/magicians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/magicians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is apartheid acceptable &#8212; for giant bugs?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/blomkamp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/blomkamp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/08/12/blomkamp</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Jackson prot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10020946' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/08/story4.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">TriStar Pictures/David Bloomer</p><p class="caption">David James (left) and director Neill Blomkamp on the set of "District 9."</p><p>Neill Blomkamp won't turn 30 until next month, but he's such a bright and likable guy it's tough to hold his success against him. At an age when lots of aspiring filmmakers are maxing out their friends' platinum cards, or banging out screenplays in North Hollywood studio apartments, Blomkamp came under the mother-hen protection -- and considerable financial clout -- of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_lord_of_the_rings/">"Lord of the Rings"</a> impresario <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/peter_jackson/">Peter Jackson.</a></p><p>Jackson and Blomkamp spent several years trying to put together a film version of the Microsoft video game Halo (Blomkamp actually made <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUcreY0X33k">three digital shorts</a> to promote a 2007 game release). When financing for that fanboy wet dream finally fell apart, Blomkamp began working on a long-percolating idea: Take an archetypal science-fiction story -- in this case, the story of humans' first contact with extraterrestrial aliens -- and set it against the explosive social realities of contemporary Johannesburg, South Africa, his hometown. (Blomkamp's family emigrated to Canada in the late '90s.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/blomkamp/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/blomkamp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Tolkien&#8217;s heirs kill off &#8220;The Hobbit&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/hobbit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/hobbit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/07/28/hobbit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Hollywood lawsuit may spark a high-stakes corporate war over the biggest franchise in entertainment history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10012567' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/07/story6.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">New Line Cinema</p><p class="caption">Ian Holm and Ian McKellen in "Lord of the Rings."</p><p>Gandalf, the benevolent and mysterious wizard in <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/tolkien/">J.R.R. Tolkien's</a> <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_lord_of_the_rings/">"The Lord of the Rings"</a> -- so memorably played by Ian McKellen in <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/peter_jackson/">Peter Jackson's</a> film trilogy -- has powerful magic at his command. But can he make $6 billion disappear? That number is the reported worldwide take for Jackson's LOTR trilogy, from box-office receipts, home-video sales and associated merchandising. Yet according to a <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aiAEIATGLREU">lawsuit</a> filed recently in Los Angeles by Tolkien's children and other interested parties, New Line Cinema and its parent company Time Warner (which produced and distributed the films) haven't paid them so much as one Orc-slobbered piece of silver.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/hobbit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/hobbit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Jackson&#8217;s alien-apartheid apocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/district_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/district_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2009/07/10/district_9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the dark political allegory (and ass-kickin' robots) of "District 9" redeem a crap-movie summer?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art c">
    <img class='wp-image-10048387' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/07/story23.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Courtesy of Sony Pictures</p><p class="caption">Image from "District 9."</p><p>You don't expect much from a sci-fi spectacle flick to be released in August -- traditional dumping ground for lice-infested studio rubbish -- but <a href="http://www.d-9.com/">"District 9,"</a> the forthcoming alien-apartheid actioner produced by <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/the_lord_of_the_rings/">"Lord of the Rings"</a> godhead <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/peter_jackson/">Peter Jackson</a> and directed by South African effects wizard Neill Blomkamp, definitely has the Internets abuzz. In large part, of course, that's because most summer cinema is so unbelievably dumb that any marginal sign of life is greeted by fans as a latter-day dispensation of loaves and fishes.</p><p>Over at SpoutBlog, <a href="http://blog.spout.com/2009/07/09/district-9-is-buzzing-like-crazy-today-in-film-bloggery-070909/">Christopher Campbell</a> has a nifty roundup of reactions to the new "District 9" trailer from fan-type bloggers and so-called journalistic professionals alike. My own reaction is that it's impressive how many people devote significant chunks of their lives to jesuitical, reading-the-tea-leaves study of unreleased and probably crappy genre movies -- where, oh where, I plead, are the blogs devoted to parsing the details of Tsai Ming-liang and B&#233;la Tarr's forthcoming films? -- but let's move on.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/district_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/district_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Beowulf&#8221; vs. &#8220;The Lord of the Rings&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/20/beowulf_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/20/beowulf_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//kamiya/2007/11/20/beowulf</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One is a living universe, the other a 3-D voyage to schlockville. A great essay by Tolkien helps us understand why.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Zemeckis' new film "Beowulf" gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "the sublime and the ridiculous." Zemeckis took the oldest and most important text of our ur-language, and turned it into a 3-D Disneyland ride so cheesy he should have called it "Anglo-Saxons of the Caribbean." Of course, there's nothing new or surprising about this. Hollywood has been profaning <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/history/">history</a> and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/literature/">literature</a> since long before Cecil B. DeMille cast Charlton Heston as Moses. If the Bible isn't sacred, why should the oldest poem in our ancestral language be? </p><p>But the "Beowulf" travesty is especially glaring, because of the obvious contrast with another work that mined the same ancient field: <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/jrr_tolkien/">J.R.R. Tolkien</a>'s "The Lord of the Rings." "Beowulf" isn't just a bad, although visually spectacular, movie, it's a huge missed opportunity. With enough imaginative audacity, Zemeckis could have created a mythical universe, one that finds the mysterious threads that connect the distant past to our time. Instead, he turned our shared cultural heritage into a cartoon. (This hasn't hurt "Beowulf" at the box office: It was the highest-grossing movie in the country after its first weekend.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/20/beowulf_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/20/beowulf_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t gay dwarves get married in Middle-earth?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/28/gay_dwarves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/28/gay_dwarves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/04/28/gay_dwarves</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video games have been ahead of the real world in accepting same-sex marriage. Why doesn't a new online "Lord of the Rings" game allow it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can vouch for my stepbrother -- he's a big supporter of equal rights for the gay and lesbian community. But when the issue of gay marriage came up at work, he voted against it. Same-sex marriage for U.S. citizens is one thing, but same-sex marriage for gay dwarves in Middle-earth is quite another. </p><p>Nik Davidson is a game designer at Turbine, the Westwood, Mass., company producing <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Midway-50092-Lord-Rings-Shadows/dp/B000GR9P76/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4574773-1639015?ie=UTF8&s=videogames&qid=1177700588&sr=8-1">"The Lord of the Rings Online: Shadows of Angmar."</a> The game has been in beta (a test version) since September, and during discussions of new features for the game, which was officially released Tuesday, the design team wound up in a heated discussion over what restrictions should be placed on marriage. They debated not only gay marriage but also marriage between members of different species. Finally, the game's executive producer settled the matter by pulling the entire marriage feature. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/28/gay_dwarves/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/28/gay_dwarves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lord of the ruins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/17/hurin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/17/hurin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/04/17/hurin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien's son Christopher spent more than 30 years piecing together fragments his father left behind. Now readers can learn what happened 6,000 years before Bilbo Baggins found the One Ring.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A few chapters into the narrative of "The Children of H&uacute;rin," the more-or-less new book more or less written by <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/jrr_tolkien/index.html">J.R.R. Tolkien,</a> a crippled woodcarver named Sador regards his abandoned handiwork with mixed emotions. Sador is a trusted servant of H&uacute;rin, lord of the House of Hador in the land of Dor-l&oacute;min, and he has been carving a great chair for his master. But months earlier, H&uacute;rin rode off to a battle that ended in terrible defeat. He did not return, and his lands have been conquered and pillaged by outsiders. So Sador has quit work on the chair and it has been "thrust unfinished in a corner." </p><p> While debating whether to break up the chair for winter firewood, Sador talks to T&uacute;rin, the young son of H&uacute;rin who will soon be sent into exile and become the wandering, accursed hero of this gloomy, gory and highly compelling tale. "I wasted my time," Sador says of his long labors, "though the hours seemed pleasant. But all such things are short-lived; and the joy in the making is their only true end, I guess." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/17/hurin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/17/hurin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tolkien&#8217;s cosmological vision</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/silmarillion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/silmarillion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2005/02/18/silmarillion</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Frodo and Sam, there were Beren and Luthien. A case for revisiting "The Silmarillion."
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last dread days of disco-d&ucirc;r, in the midst of the Seventh Age -- known in perhaps a more familiar tongue as "the Nineteen Seventsies" -- there emerged from the House of Houghton Mifflin, and later from that of Ballan-tine, a great book of which much was expected, though few but the most ardent of devotees could wholly comprehend it. It has, in the Tolkienian spirit, valiantly returned. </p><p>"The Silmarillion," J.R.R. Tolkien's fantastically complex, comprehensive and, yes, uneven mythological narrative was his life's work -- the underlying structural legend of the world into which young Frodo Baggins would later walk, many millennia hence, on his arduous journey to cast the One Ring into the fires of Mount Doom. Its narrative principally concerns the time before "The Lord of the Rings," from the genesis of E&auml; and Arda (the universe and Earth, in Tolkien's legendarium) to the creation of Middle Earth and its denizens -- the divine, the Elvish, and the human, with nary a hobbit in sight. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/silmarillion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/18/silmarillion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archaeologist of lost worlds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/06/21/erikson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/06/21/erikson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2004/06/21/erikson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Overdosed on Harry? Had it with hobbits? Steven Erikson's sweeping 10-volume series, "The Malazan Book of the Fallen," might be just the fantasy epic that adult readers have been longing for.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"What's this, Daddy?" my 6-year-old son asked me one morning, as we were mucking about in the backyard. He was holding a rusted, mud-and-clay spattered hunk of cast iron, heavy enough that he could barely hoist it waist-high with both hands. </p><p>I recognized it as the head of a <a target="new" href="http://members.aol.com/dargolyt/TheForge/mattock.htm">mattock.</a> But I told him it had to be a magical artifact dating back to an ancient, lost civilization that had flourished in what is now called "Berkeley" thousands upon thousands of years ago. </p><p>His eyes sparkled. It wasn't that he believed me. I'm not trustworthy on these matters. But a 6-year-old digging in the mud doesn't need much encouragement. Suddenly, his latent paleo-archeological inclinations blossomed. He found a little paintbrush to wipe the dust off half-buried bricks. He began a running commentary: A salamander under a rock became a Great Snake Demon. A broken hoe blade -- a fragment of the shield of the mighty warrior MegaMon. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/06/21/erikson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/06/21/erikson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

