<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Karl Rove</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/karl_rove/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous 2012: a year in review</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 07:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunter moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Pillar of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Charest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anaheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police brutality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Dawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippine cybercrime prevention act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a busy year for the global hacktivist collective Anonymous
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2012, the loose association of tech-based activists protested bullying, LGBT discrimination, corporate media, Israel, <a href="http://anonnews.org/press/item/1720/">Muslim genocide</a>, police brutality, election-rigging, douchebaggery/bullying, surveillance, nationalist education, and of course Internet censorship—expanding both the range of its “causes” and the tools it deployed to defend them.</p><p>Of course, it’s impossible to say with certainty which actions "Anonymous" actually pulled off, since its membership is ill-defined and anyone can claim association, not to mention that sometimes Anonymous hacktivists act alone or as part of a subgroup.  Even when Anonymous has put out one of its quintessential videos claiming responsibility for a hack or DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service—shutting down a website by flooding it with requests) attack, it hasn’t always turned out to be true.</p><p>Given that, below are Anonymous’ “Top 20” for 2012. With its widening arsenal and focus, one can only imagine what these Internet denizens have in store for 2013.</p><p>[slide_show id=13151256]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/anonymous_2012_a_year_in_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican House built on dark money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It couldn't buy them the White House, but Republicans have super PAC cash to thank for their House majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> In the November election, a million more Americans <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/us/politics/redistricting-helped-republicans-hold-onto-congress.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">voted</a> for Democrats seeking election to the U.S. House of Representatives than Republicans. But that popular vote advantage did not result in control of the chamber. Instead, despite getting fewer votes, Republicans have maintained a commanding control of the House. Such a disparity has happened only three times in the last century.</p><p>(<a href="http://projects.propublica.org/graphics/seats-vs-votes">Here’s a chart comparing 2010 and 2012</a>.)</p><p>Analysts and others have identified redistricting as a key to the disparity. Republicans had a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/us/politics/redistricting-helped-republicans-hold-onto-congress.html?ref=reapportionment&amp;pagewanted=all">years-long strategy of winning state houses</a> in order to control each state's once-a-decade redistricting process. (Confused about redistricting? Check out our <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/video-the-redistricting-song">song</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/republican_house_built_on_dark_money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove&#8217;s shameless dark money lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/karl_roves_shameless_dark_money_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/karl_roves_shameless_dark_money_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His group told the IRS it would spend "limited" amounts to influence the elections -- and then dropped $70 million]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> In a <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/537045-crossroads-gps-application-to-irs">confidential 2010 filing</a>, Crossroads GPS — the dark money group that spent more than $70 million from anonymous donors on the 2012 election — told the Internal Revenue Service that its efforts would focus on public education, research and shaping legislation and policy.</p><p>The group's application for recognition as a social welfare nonprofit <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/537045-crossroads-gps-application-to-irs#document/p4/a84315">acknowledged</a> that it would spend money to influence elections, but said "any such activity will be limited in amount, and will not constitute the organization's primary purpose."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/karl_roves_shameless_dark_money_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/karl_roves_shameless_dark_money_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rove: Obama wants Republican &#8220;civil war&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/rove_obama_wants_republican_civil_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/rove_obama_wants_republican_civil_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is playing the long game in the "fiscal cliff" negotiations, Rove says]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an Op-Ed in the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323297104578175292501105774.html">Wall Street Journal</a>, Karl Rove accused President Obama of pushing for a "civil war" within the Republican Party, and using the "fiscal cliff" negotiations to shore up his party's position for 2014.</p><p>Rove writes that Obama's positions on tax increases and additional stimulus spending are both "political" and "ideological. The president does want to expand government's size, cost and reach in order to, in his words, 'transform' America."</p><p>He continued that Obama is also hoping that by not backing down on tax increases, he can cause a rift in the Republican party:</p><blockquote><p>He apparently believes that Republicans, in a weakened state and defending an unpopular position, might buckle on a central GOP tenet, opposition to any increase in marginal rates. That might kick off a Republican civil war, resulting in divisive party primaries in 2014 that leave the president's opposition even more weakened and produce more subpar candidates like this year's Republican Senate candidates in Indiana and Missouri.</p></blockquote><p>"This brings us to Mr. Obama's real goal: having Democrats recapture the House in 2014 and once again stave off losses in the Senate," Rove writes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/rove_obama_wants_republican_civil_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/rove_obama_wants_republican_civil_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove wasn&#8217;t benched from Fox News for long</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/karl_rove_wasnt_benched_from_fox_news_for_long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/karl_rove_wasnt_benched_from_fox_news_for_long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, that was quick. After a 27-day hiatus, Karl Rove has made his triumphant return to Fox News]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time since he refused to accept the Election Night returns from Ohio, Karl Rove made an appearance on Fox News.</p><p>Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/12/rove-returns-to-fox-after-day-absence-151585.html">counts</a> 27 days since Rove's last appearance on Fox, a brief hiatus that ended with last night's appearance on "Special Report" with Bret Baier.</p><p>Gabe Sherman of <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/12/fox-news-puts-karl-rove-on-the-bench.html">New York Magazine</a> reported last week that Fox News chief Roger Ailes instructed staffers to keep Rove and Dick Morris off the air, as "a pair of pundits perhaps most closely aligned with Fox’s anti-Obama campaign," as Sherman put it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/karl_rove_wasnt_benched_from_fox_news_for_long/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/karl_rove_wasnt_benched_from_fox_news_for_long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove won&#8217;t surrender race card</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/karl_rove_wont_surrender_race_card/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/karl_rove_wont_surrender_race_card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Atwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willie Horton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The disgusting racial codes in his super PAC's new ad suggest the GOP will never stop pitting us against each other]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Atwater's claim to fame was his pioneering use of racially divisive imagery in political messages that, superficially, didn't seem to be about race at all. The most infamous examples, of course, were Atwater ads like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTdUQ9SYhUw">"Revolving Door"</a> and the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io9KMSSEZ0Y">Willie Horton</a> spots. Under the guise of a colorblind message about criminal justice, those spots homed in on African-American criminals in a deliberate effort to stoke racial fears among whites. In employing such a formula, the ads embodied the now-standard dog-whistle tactic for racial messaging -- a tactic that itself was an outgrowth of Atwater's guiding political principle about euphemistic language.</p><p>"You start out in 1954 by saying, 'Nigger, nigger, nigger,'" he <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy">said</a>. "By 1968 you can’t say 'nigger' -- that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/karl_rove_wont_surrender_race_card/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/karl_rove_wont_surrender_race_card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand old grifters rebuked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Armey gets $8 million to leave FreedomWorks, while Fox benches Karl Rove. Justice, or just pretense?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP's November shellacking is rattling the foundations of its powerful media-wingnut welfare-industrial complex. Some big names are either parting ways with former allies, or find themselves under suspicion, with their privileges to roam the right-wing fearscape spewing propaganda suddenly limited.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/dick_armey/">My old friend Dick Armey</a>, the former Texas congressman who made a fortune astro-turfing the Tea Party, has left the organization he helped found, FreedomWorks. <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/12/dick-armey-resigns-freedomworks-tea-party">David Corn at Mother Jones broke the news</a>, and Armey depicted the parting of ways as "matters of principle." Then AP revealed that Armey will receive $8 million in consulting fees even though – or because – he left the group, and <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/dick-armey-freedomworks-president-clashed-over-book-deal-84599.html?hp=l12">Politico explained</a> that Armey's alleged last straw came when partner Matt Kibbe signed a book contract that paid him personally for a book largely inspired by (and partly researched by) FreedomWorks and its staff. Sounds like a matter of principle, until you look more closely.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Karl Rove, Dick Morris pushed to sidelines at Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/report_karl_rove_dick_morris_pushed_to_sidelines_at_fox_news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/report_karl_rove_dick_morris_pushed_to_sidelines_at_fox_news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fox News confirms a New York magazine report that special permission is now needed to book the wildly wrong pundits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel Sherman of New York magazine <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/12/fox-news-puts-karl-rove-on-the-bench.html">reports</a> this evening that Karl Rove and Dick Morris sightings are about to become scarce on Fox News.</p><p>Fox News sources told Sherman that Rove and Morris -- who, respectively, questioned on air whether Ohio would go for President Obama even after the network's decision desk called the race for the president, and predicted a Romney landslide -- are heading to the sidelines, on orders from Roger Ailes.</p><p><a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/12/fox-news-puts-karl-rove-on-the-bench.html">Writes Sherman:</a></p><blockquote><p>Ailes’s orders mean new rules. Ailes’s deputy, Fox News programming chief Bill Shine, has sent out orders mandating that producers must get permission before booking Rove or Morris.</p></blockquote><p>In confirming the new rules to New York, a Fox News spokesperson said "the election's over."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/report_karl_rove_dick_morris_pushed_to_sidelines_at_fox_news/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/report_karl_rove_dick_morris_pushed_to_sidelines_at_fox_news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. Burns issues PSA explaining the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montgomery burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Simpsons's" number one Romney supporter says that "rich people feel things more deeply than the common man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While awaiting a call from Karl Rove, "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=c91usT4P1u0">The Simpsons</a>" rich villain Montgomery Burns explains the fiscal cliff in terms us commoners will understand: "Think of the economy as a car and the rich man as the driver. If you don't give the driver all the money, he will drive you over a cliff. It's just common sense."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/c91usT4P1u0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 reasons the GOP will lose in &#8217;16</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/4_reasons_the_gop_wont_win_in_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/4_reasons_the_gop_wont_win_in_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After openly insulting more than half the electorate, a disingenuous "rebranding" can't save the Republican Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Beyond rightwing forment and self-flagellation, epic dilemmas bedevil all Republican dreams of regaining a national majority:</p><p>1)  Fealty to manifestly discredited belief systems (cultural, economic, religious, and scientific);</p><p>2)  Fealty to disgraced, ideological leaders whose arteries are hardening, rhetorically-suicidal and/or slow to get demographic “death spirals;”</p><p>3)  Justified anxiety that “rebranding” different enough to engage newly-empowered centrists will alienate far more base zealots already feeling besieged from both sides.</p><p>4)  Reactionary robber barons will keep afloat any “anti-business Obama” gang, whatever the setbacks, with plenty more billions to secure favorable permits, subsidies, laws, and deregulation.</p><p>In a nutshell, how does a party of insular, rigid true believers, thrusting warlike middle fingers towards modernity, talk itself into modernizing just because it lost one election? Aside from putting lipstick on a pig, where’s the miraculous (earthbound) agency that modernizes angry, resentful Tea Partiers whose outrage targeted the very diverse, younger, secular crowds now crowning the future?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/4_reasons_the_gop_wont_win_in_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/4_reasons_the_gop_wont_win_in_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Anonymous stop Rove from stealing the election?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/did_anonymous_stop_rove_stealing_the_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/did_anonymous_stop_rove_stealing_the_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swing states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project ORCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13103586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would explain his Fox News outburst, but the Hacker claim lacks evidence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Election Night, viewers <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/fox_news_dark_night_of_the_soul/">watched in shock</a> as Karl Rove refused to accept the call, confirmed by Fox News analysts, that Ohio had gone to Obama.</p><p>A release claiming to be from hacker collective Anonymous alleges there was more behind Rove's freak-out than first met the eye. The group says that it f<a href="http://samuel-warde.com/2012/11/did-anonymous-block-carl-roves-attempt-to-steal-election/">oiled Rove's attempt to steal the election</a> in Florida, Virginia and Ohio by using the GOP's ORCA system.</p><p>Two weeks prior to Election Night, a typical Anonymous video was released warning Rove against rigging the election. "We want you to know that we are watching you, waiting for you to make this mistake of thinking you can rig this election to your favor," Anonymous' ubiquitous Guy Fawkes character warned.</p><p>Then, following Obama's win and Rove's very public outburst, a group calling themselves "The Protectors," believed to be comprised of Anonymous hackers, sent a letter to election transparency non-profit, Velvet Revolution, claiming to have thwarted attempts by GOP strategists to flip votes and rig the election in three swing states.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/did_anonymous_stop_rove_stealing_the_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/did_anonymous_stop_rove_stealing_the_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 reasons Republicans think their party&#8217;s dysfunctional</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of Mitt's defeat, Republicans are still searching for answers -- but they all agree they hate Karl Rove]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Just as the Republican Party might have contemplated an end to its wound-licking (the better to gin up its scandal-making machine for President Barack Obama’s second term), vanquished Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney proved to be -- for liberals, at least -- the gift that keeps on giving.</p><p>The president, Romney told a group of campaign donors on a November 14 conference call, won re-election by promising free stuff to his homeboys and women’s libbers and brown people who inconveniently declined to self-deport -- or words to that effect.</p><p>“What the president -- president's campaign did was focus on certain members of his base coalition, give them extraordinary financial gifts from the government,” Romney told his fat cats, apparently unaware that <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/15/nation/la-na-romney-donors-20121115">reporters</a> were listening in. Soon that particular cat leapt out of the proverbial bag, and it was the 47 percent all over again -- offering a vision of the majority of the electorate that voted for Obama as a bunch of moochers. The one difference, of course, was that no longer the party’s presidential contender, Romney learned that Republicans were free to kick him to the curb, which they did with steel-toed boots.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/10_reasons_republicans_think_their_partys_dysfunctional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ailes: Karl Rove was wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/ailes_karl_rove_was_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/ailes_karl_rove_was_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megyn Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News co-founder says "our guys were right" on election night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ailes <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/roger-ailes-on-election-night-rove-was-wrong-he-backed-down-our-guys-were-right_b155209">told TVNewser </a>that he was shocked by Karl Rove on election night. Famously, Rove refused to accept that President Obama had won Ohio and challenged the Fox News analysts on air for calling the decision, prompting host Megyn Kelly to bring the decision desk team on air.</p><p>Ailes recalled watching the footage: "I turn on the TV and the first thing I see is Rove saying something like, ‘you called Ohio too early.’ And I thought, ‘What the? What is this?’”</p><p>Ailes told TVNewser that he gave the command to keep the cameras running throughout the awkward interchange: "So I quickly called [EVP of News] <strong><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/Michael-Clemente-profile.html">Michael Clemente</a></strong> and I said, ‘Michael, whatever you do, don’t go to commercial. Don’t leave the screen.'"</p><p>“As it turned out, Rove was wrong. He backed down. Our guys were right," said Ailes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/ailes_karl_rove_was_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/ailes_karl_rove_was_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 signs the right is losing it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karl Rove's election-night meltdown has proven to be a harbinger of conservative freak-outs to come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Last week on election night, we saw the right-wing media and its <a href="http://www.alternet.org/media/how-right-wing-medias-fantasy-world-caused-republican-meltdown-election-night">audience have a collective meltdown</a> after their fantasy world was shattered and Barack Obama won a second term. It was a big win for people who believe in numbers, and a loss for folks who prefer to have <a href="http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/5-very-bad-things-happened-karl-rove-just-2-days">Karl Rove lie to them</a>.</p><p>We had seen signs of stress within the party and its adherents leading to to the election, and since then we’ve seen everyone from members of the GOP elite to right-wing foot soldiers go through the first four Kübler-Ross stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, and depression. (Whether they’ll get to acceptance remains to be seen.)</p><p>Below are several examples of how conservatives at all levels have gone off the deep end in the days leading up to and following the election.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/5_signs_the_right_is_losing_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: &#8220;The Simpsons&#8221; mocks Karl Rove</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/must_see_morning_clip_the_simpsons_mocks_karl_rove/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/must_see_morning_clip_the_simpsons_mocks_karl_rove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And his election night meltdown over Ohio]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this week's opening credits for "The Simpsons," Bart is in trouble for defying Karl Rove.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Viyne8F06eU" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/must_see_morning_clip_the_simpsons_mocks_karl_rove/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/must_see_morning_clip_the_simpsons_mocks_karl_rove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: SNL on Mitt&#8217;s defeat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt laments his loss outside on the balcony, drowning his sorrows in milk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week's Saturday Night Live imagined that Mitt Romney spent his election night party out on the balcony, secretly on a milk binge, while Paul Ryan did "feats of strength in the drawing room."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=nsv1af3datp-nb6fkokccw" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove&#8217;s having a bad week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/karl_roves_having_a_bad_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/karl_roves_having_a_bad_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First his candidate gets trounced, then he suffers the indignity of a Trump Twitter blast. Poor Turd Blossom!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> There’s been much schadenfreude on the left in the days after Tuesday’s election, and understandably so: Fox News, right-wing politicians, and conservative pundits all took an embarrassing beating.</p><p>Perhaps the biggest recipient of that schadenfreude is Karl Rove. Rove has had a rough week, to put it mildly. After his infamous meltdown on Fox News Tuesday night – at one point in the evening Fox anchor Megyn Kelly asked him if his calculations were “math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better” – things have just continued to go downhill. Here’s how.</p><p><strong>1. Researchers find that Rove’s super PAC was one of the election’s biggest losers.</strong></p><p>Researchers at the watchdog group the Sunlight Foundation <a href="http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/2012/return_on_investment/">found that</a> Rove’s American Crossroads super PAC came in second to last, ahead of only the NRA, in terms of how much “bang for their buck” they got in this election. The<em>American Prospect</em> <a href="http://prospect.org/article/karl-roves-money-trouble">explains</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/karl_roves_having_a_bad_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/karl_roves_having_a_bad_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Money lost the battle, but the war goes on</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/big_money_lost_the_battle_but_the_war_goes_on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/big_money_lost_the_battle_but_the_war_goes_on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossroads GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Huge-spending GOP super PACs failed to swing the election. But they'll be back, smarter and stronger than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Never before has so much political money been spent to achieve so little,” the Washington Post’s Dan Eggen and T.W. Farnam wrote in their big A1 story yesterday. “Spending by outside groups, it turns out, was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/spending-by-independent-groups-had-little-election-impact-analysis-finds/2012/11/07/15fd30ea-276c-11e2-b2a0-ae18d6159439_print.html">the dog that barked but did not bite</a>.” You can find a similar narrative in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/us/politics/little-to-show-for-cash-flood-by-big-donors.html?ref=politics">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83534.html?hp=t2_3">Politico</a>, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324073504578105371839771426.html">Wall Street Journal</a> and pretty much everywhere else.</p><p>And indeed, Tuesday was a terrible no good awful night for most of the biggest super PACs and other assorted "outside" groups, as most of them are Republican-aligned and Republicans lost big. Hundreds of millions of dollars down the drain and with nothing to show for it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/big_money_lost_the_battle_but_the_war_goes_on/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/big_money_lost_the_battle_but_the_war_goes_on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA also lost big on Election Day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/nra_also_lost_big_on_election_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/nra_also_lost_big_on_election_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crossroads GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Add the National Rifle Association to the list of conservatives who bet big and lost in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sunlight Foundation analyzed election spending by the National Rifle Association, and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/wp/2012/11/08/national-rifle-association-shut-out/">determined</a> that the group had a less than 1 percent return on its more than $11 million investment.</p><p>The study, based on FEC reporting, found that the NRA backed 27 winning candidates, but only 0.42 percent of the $11,787,523 it spent on the election went to those candidates. Instead, 78 percent of the money went to opposing Democrats. From the report:</p><blockquote><p>- 0.81% of $10,955,688 spent in the general election and ending in the desired result.<br /> - Supported 27 winning candidates ; 0.42% of money went to supporting winning candidates.<br /> - Opposed 5 losing candidates; 0.39% of money went to opposing losing candidates.</p></blockquote><p>Sunlight also highlights that the Karl Rove-tied American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS <a href="http://reporting.sunlightfoundation.com/2012/return_on_investment/">poured</a> over $200 million into the elections, but supported no winning candidates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/nra_also_lost_big_on_election_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/nra_also_lost_big_on_election_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shattering the Rove myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It turns out Karl Rove is a terrible political analyst]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To some he's a hero, to others a villain, but everyone -- right, left, and center -- seems to agree on one thing about Karl Rove: He’s really really smart. Rove is, most political observers assume, one of the savviest operators in politics today, so when he speaks, people listen. After Citizens United and the 2010 GOP wave, when Rove ruled Washington from his non-perch at American Crossroads, I saw more than one very smart liberal go from mocking Rove as a liar and hack one minute to having the blood drain from the face when he made an ominous political prediction the next. Such is the power of the Rove.</p><p>Or at least it was. Tuesday night may have shattered the Myth of Rove, just as it shattered Rove himself when he <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-november-7-2012/post-democalypse-2012---america-takes-a-shower---karl-rove-s-math">had a meltdown</a> in front of millions on Fox News viewers after the network called Ohio for Obama. The moment, which has since gone viral, was the perfect encapsulation of Emperor Has No Clothes realization that Rove is now experiencing. Rove was proven wrong. On live TV. By Fox News. And of course, that wasn’t the only thing he got wrong. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/the_biggest_losers_of_pundity/">He blew the whole election</a>, predicting Romney would win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/shattering_the_rove_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>