<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Kentucky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/kentucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Accidental child shooting in Kentucky sparks gun debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 5-year old accidentally shot his sister with a gun made by a company that markets for children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BURKESVILLE, Ky. (AP) — As Stephanie Sparks cleaned the kitchen, her 5-year-old son, Kristian, began playing with a rifle he was given last year. She stepped out onto the front porch, poured grease out of a frying pan for the dogs and "heard the gun go off," a Kentucky coroner said.</p><p>Authorities said the boy had fatally shot his 2-year-old sister, Caroline, in the chest.</p><p>In rural southern Kentucky, far removed from the national debate over gun control, where some children get their first guns even before they start first grade, the accident stunned the community.</p><p>Kristian's rifle was kept in a corner of the mobile home, and the family didn't realize a bullet had been left in it, Cumberland County Coroner Gary White said.</p><p>"Down in Kentucky where we're from, you know, guns are passed down from generation to generation," White said. "You start at a young age with guns for hunting and everything."</p><p>What is more unusual than a child having a gun, he said, is "that a kid would get shot with it."</p><p>In this case, the rifle was made by a company that sells guns specifically for children — "My first rifle" is the slogan — in colors ranging from plain brown to hot pink to royal blue to multi-color swirls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ky_child_shooting_part_of_urban_rural_gun_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell responds to Obama&#8217;s drink joke with Clint Eastwood joke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McConnell's campaign tweeted a picture of the senator drinking with an empty chair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell responded to a crack President Obama made about him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a reference to Clint Eastwood's empty chair bit at the Republican National Convention.</p><p>Obama had <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/">joked</a> that people complain that he doesn't reach across the aisle enough. "'Why don't you get a drink with Mitch McConnell?' they ask," Obama said. "Really? Why don't <em>you</em> get a drink with Mitch McConnell?"</p><p>McConnell responded during an appearance before the Southeast Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/29/mcconnell-jokes-about-his-soft-side-in-response-to-obama/">Washington Post</a> reports, saying: “I’m shocked. He’s obviously not seeing my soft side.”</p><p>His campaign Twitter account also <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mcconnell-responds-to-obamas-whcd-joke-about-having">tweeted</a> a picture of McConnell drinking with an empty chair, also looping in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/clint_eastwood_steals_the_rnc/">Clint Eastwood</a>:</p><p>[embedtweet id="328939838835392513"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul would&#8217;ve been OK with using drones to hunt Boston suspect</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rand_paul_wouldve_been_ok_with_using_drones_to_hunt_boston_suspect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rand_paul_wouldve_been_ok_with_using_drones_to_hunt_boston_suspect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["If there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Rand Paul, recently hailed by Republicans and Democrats alike for his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/rand_paul_filibustering_brennan/">filibuster</a> against the Obama Administration's drone policy, said he would have been fine with using drones to track down Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the Boston bombing suspect who was the target of a extended manhunt by law enforcement.</p><p>"If there is a killer on the loose in a neighborhood, I’m not against drones being used to search them," he said on the Fox Business Channel.</p><p>Paul said that the difference in this case was that there was an "imminent threat."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rand_paul_wouldve_been_ok_with_using_drones_to_hunt_boston_suspect/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rand_paul_wouldve_been_ok_with_using_drones_to_hunt_boston_suspect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell ad links &#8220;dirty&#8221; Progress Kentucky to Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["How dirty will Obama's allies get?" the ad asks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an new ad, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell links Progress Kentucky, the liberal Super PAC <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/">accused</a> of making secret recordings of a McConnell campaign meeting, to President Obama, asking how "dirty" his allies will get in the race.</p><p>"Mitch McConnell is Obama's No. 1 target because Mitch protects Kentucky from Obama's bad ideas," the ad says. "Liberals will do anything to beat McConnell. They also launched racial attacks against Mitch's wife. And now liberals compare Mitch to al Qaeda terrorists and North Korea's dictator. How dirty will Obama's allies get?"</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tjpmwxc41Bw" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James O&#8217;Keefe defends David Corn on McConnell recordings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Corn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O'Keefe writes that he "shares David Corn’s vision of bringing veritas to the vulgate"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mother Jones' David Corn has an unlikely defender in the case of the secret Mitch McConnell recordings: Conservative gadfly James O'Keefe.</p><p>In a blog post for <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/15/james-o-keefe-in-defense-of-taping-mitch-mcconnell-and-everyone-else.html">the Daily Beast</a> called  "James O’Keefe in Defense of Taping Mitch McConnell, and Everyone Else," O'Keefe writes that he "shares David Corn’s vision of bringing <em>veritas</em> to the vulgate, or truth to the people," and says that "I’ve become all too familiar with civil and criminal statutes that are bad for democracy because they insolate those vested in a public trust from democratic accountability."</p><p>From the post:</p><blockquote><p>While the two young people who allegedly recorded McConnell, Shawn Reilly and Curtis Morrison, may have overstepped the line this time, conservatives need to understand that the potential punishment they face is incommensurate with the crime under the present law. Raw and unfiltered recordings are the best tools we have to expose things as they really are. Last year John Fund referred to our video showing Eric Holder’s ballot to vote offered to a stranger as “cinema verité.” Now David Corn said of his McConnell tape, “No one needs to listen to me or any commentator to know what it means ... It’s all there ... It’s journalism verité.” As someone who shares David Corn’s vision of bringing <em>veritas</em> to the vulgate, or truth to the people, I wholeheartedly agree.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart eviscerates Rand Paul&#8217;s speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_eviscerates_rand_pauls_speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_eviscerates_rand_pauls_speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Rand Paul's said he was either "brave or crazy" to speak at historically black Howard University]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an actual thing Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky said to students at historically black Howard University recently:<br /> ""Some people have asked me, 'Are you nervous about speaking at Howard?'" and "Some have said that I'm either brave or crazy to be here today." </p><p>He then continued on an increasingly out-of-touch and ignorant conversation on race relations between the GOP and blacks. Jon Stewart shares the highlights and sets the record straight: </p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:425385" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-11-2013/guess-who-s-coming-to-howard">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_eviscerates_rand_pauls_speech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_eviscerates_rand_pauls_speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress Kentucky: Worst super PAC ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even before the last two scandals, Kentucky liberals called the group an "embarrassment"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal super PAC Progress Kentucky is at the center of controversy after a Democratic strategist in the state said activists affiliated with the group bragged to him that they secretly recorded the audiotape of Mitch McConnell's strategy meeting that was leaked to Mother Jones this week. If true, they could face criminal sanctions. The treasurer of the super PAC <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/11/17708661-liberal-ky-group-spotlighted-in-mcconnell-audio-probe?lite">resigned</a> this afternoon.</p><p>Now, it's worth stating that we don't know for sure that Progress Kentucky produced the tape or is involved in any way -- this is just the word of one Democratic strategist, who has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/11/progress-kentucky-mcconnell_n_3064265.html">an interest</a> in distancing his party from the group.</p><p>But it's not the first time the super PAC has gotten into trouble. In late February, they <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/kentucky_pac_slurs_mcconnell_family/">made a series of offensive "jokes"</a> about McConnell's wife on Twitter, attacking her for being Chinese-American. Even Ashley Judd felt compelled to issue a <a href="https://twitter.com/AshleyJudd/status/306515894295724033">public condemnation</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are the culture wars really over?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Views on sex, drugs and religion still dictate public policy decisions more than we might like to think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a> Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in the latest<em> <a href="http://www.democracyjournal.org/28/of-freedom-and-fairness.php?page=all" target="_blank">Democracy</a></em>:</p><blockquote><p>In 1943, Allied forces achieved a hard-fought victory in the North African campaign, captured Sicily, and began to fight their way up the Italian peninsula. Victories in places such as El-Alamein, Salerno, and Anzio gave America some confidence that the Allies would ultimately prevail in Europe. That confidence allowed the American public to shift more of its attention to the Pacific Theater. Popular magazines such as <em>National Geographic</em> began to publish more maps and articles about the Pacific because Americans suddenly wanted to know a lot more about Saipan and Leyte Gulf.</p> <p>The same sort of shift is happening now for the left in America’s long-running culture war. From the 1980s until the birth of the Tea Party, most of the action was in the Social Theater, in which the religious right and the secular left waged an existential struggle for the soul of American society. Issues related to sexuality, drugs, religion, family life, and patriotism were particularly vexing, and many people over 40 can recall the names of battlefields such as Mapplethorpe, needle exchange, 2 Live Crew, and the flag-burning amendment. But the left won a smashing victory in the 2012 elections, including the first victories at the ballot box for gay marriage. These triumphs, combined with polling data showing the tolerant attitudes of younger voters, give the left confidence that it will ultimately prevail on most issues in the Social Theater. The power base of the religious right is older, white, rural Protestants, a group that immigration, demography, and urban renewal have consigned to play an ever-shrinking role in American presidential elections.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell planned to attack Judd as &#8220;emotionally unbalanced&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A secret tape reveals Republicans intended to use the actress' struggles with depression against her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secret audiotapes <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/mitch-mcconnell-ashley-judd-secret-tape-senate">obtained by Mother Jones' David Corn</a> reveal that Mitch McConnell and his team discussed using actress Ashley Judd's childhood thoughts of suicide against her were she to mount a challenge to the Senate minority leader. Judd recently decided to forgo a run, but before she did, McConnell sat down with top staffers to discuss their strategy to fight her.</p><p>In addition to portraying her as a Hollywood liberal, the team suggested using her well-known struggles with depression against her, and essentially planned to portray her as an anti-American weirdo. "This sounds extreme, but she is emotionally unbalanced," the aide leading the meeting told McConnell.</p><p>In her 2011 memoir, Judd discussed her past bouts with depression, which included a brief hospitalization and the revelation that she had had thoughts of suicide -- in 6th grade. As they went through the material, McConnell's staff laughed heartily at several occasions and mocked Judd's comment about the culture shock she feels upon returning to the U.S. after a stint abroad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashley Judd adviser: Kentucky Dems &#8220;duped&#8221; the press to force her out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Miller says the national media seized on false and "salacious recriminations" against Judd ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Miller, a political adviser to Ashley Judd, claims that a small group of Kentucky Democrats fed the national press "salacious" lies in order to push her out of the race.</p><p>Miller writes on <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/01/how-kentucky-democrats-duped-the-msm-and-helped-elbow-out-ashley-judd.html">the Daily Beast</a>:</p><blockquote> <div> <p>As the actress contemplated whether to move back to Kentucky and challenge Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, I was alternating with Congressman John Yarmuth as witness for the defense against a steady stream of salacious recriminations.</p> </div> <div> <p>The prosecution was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/us/politics/kentuckians-dont-rule-out-ashley-judd-as-potential-senator.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" target="_blank">assisted</a> in <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/news/kentucky_democrats_fear_judd_may_drag_down_ticket-222436-1.html" target="_blank">nearly</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/14/ashley-judd-democrats_n_2686042.html" target="_blank">every</a> <a href="http://fatlip.leoweekly.com/2013/02/18/ashley-judd-the-general-assembly-and-the-ky-democratic-strategists-who-hate-her/" target="_blank">article</a> by the same handful of Democratic professionals railing against the prospects of a Judd candidacy, promoting instead the potential Senate candidacy of Kentucky’s young Secretary of State, Alison Lundergan Grimes. While many may legitimately believe that Grimes is the better candidate, many of those who have been quoted impugning Judd, or have done so on background, also have personal motives: some stand to profit from a Grimes campaign, some may have been trying to <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/278977-kentucky-dems-not-sold-on-possible-judd-senate-run" target="_blank">redress perceived “disses”</a> by the actress, and some may be aiming to keep Grimes out of the 2015 gubernatorial race, where she could undermine their preferred candidates.</p> </div> </blockquote><div> <p>Among the lies, Miller says, was the report that Judd told supporters at a fundraiser,  “I have been raped twice, so I think I can handle Mitch McConnell," and that Bill Clinton himself was trying to force Judd out. Both, he writes, are untrue.</p> <p>Read the full article <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/01/how-kentucky-democrats-duped-the-msm-and-helped-elbow-out-ashley-judd.html">here</a>.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashley Judd is not running for Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell would have attacked her as a Hollywood liberal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley Judd will not mount a challenge to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in 2014, she announced today.</p><p>[embedtweet id="317020489564430337"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317020733744226304"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317020965978664960"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317021214856069120"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317021619543490561"]</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/27/ashley-judd-is-not-running-for-senate/">Washington Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Democratic Senate strategists have <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/04/ashley-judd-seems-like-she-is-running-for-senate-is-that-bad-thing-for-democrats/">argued</a> that Judd would be a good, if unconventional candidate, pointing to her ability to rival or even eclipse McConnell in fundraising. But McConnell’s path to victory involves savaging his opponent, and Judd’s status as an actress and celebrity would have offered him loads of ammunition.</p></blockquote><p>The most likely Democratic candidate is now Secretary of State Allison Lundergan Grimes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky legislature overrides veto of &#8220;religious freedom&#8221; bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/kentucky_legislature_overrides_veto_of_religious_freedom_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/kentucky_legislature_overrides_veto_of_religious_freedom_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Beshear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law could give cover to discrimination against gays and lesbians based on "sincerely held religious beliefs"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kentucky legislature has overridden a veto by Gov. Steve Beshear of a law that expands legal protections to those who claim  "sincerely held religious beliefs."</p><p>The <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/27/kentucky-religious-freedom-bill_n_2960353.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">Associated Press</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The law will give stronger legal standing to people in court who claim the government burdened their ability to practice their religion. The legislation protects "sincerely held religious beliefs" from infringement unless there is "a compelling governmental interest." The courts will still consider and rule on each matter.</p> <p>Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear vetoed the bill Friday over concerns that someone's claim of religious freedom could undermine civil rights protections for gays and lesbians and lead to costly lawsuits for taxpayers.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/kentucky_legislature_overrides_veto_of_religious_freedom_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/kentucky_legislature_overrides_veto_of_religious_freedom_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky governor vetoes &#8220;religious freedom&#8221; bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/kentucky_governor_vetoes_religious_freedom_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/kentucky_governor_vetoes_religious_freedom_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Beshear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though Steve Beshear, a Democrat, blocked the bill, the legislature could still override his veto]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Steve Beshear, D-Ky., vetoed a bill that would carve out broader protections for "religious freedom," which in practice could give cover to those who discriminate against gays and lesbians. The bill, which overwhelmingly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/kentucky_bill_would_protect_discrimination_as_religious_freedom/">passed</a> out of the state House and state Senate, will return to the legislature next week for a vote to potentially override the veto.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20130322/NEWS0101/303220092/Gov-Steve-Beshear-vetoes-religious-freedom-bill-says-threatens-public-safety-civil-rights?nclick_check=1">Louisville Courier-Journal</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The bill passed the House 82-7 and the Senate 29-6. Only a majority vote in both chambers is required to have the bill become law over Beshear’s veto.</p> <p>In a news release, Beshear said he had “significant concerns” that the bill would “cause serious unintentional consequences that could threaten public safety, health care and individuals’ civil rights.”</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/kentucky_governor_vetoes_religious_freedom_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/kentucky_governor_vetoes_religious_freedom_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton, Kentucky Dems reportedly courting Ashley Judd alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky secretary of state may be getting a push to challenge McConnell in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky Democrats, along with Bill Clinton, possibly worried about the potential pitfalls of an Ashley Judd candidacy, are reportedly pushing another state Democrat to challenge Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/kentucky-senate-2014-alison-lundergan-grimes-ashley-judd-89091.html">Politico</a> reports that Clinton is courting Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Kentucky secretary of state, to get into the race:</p><blockquote><p>Grimes does have the Clintons in her corner. Earlier this month, the former president — a longtime friend of Grimes’s father — privately urged the young secretary of state to mount a Senate bid while assuring Grimes that both he and his wife, Hillary, would get behind her should she decide to take on the powerful Senate GOP leader, according to several sources familiar with the matter.</p></blockquote><p>Grimes has also reportedly met with officials from the DSCC, according to Politico.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul endorses immigrant path to citizenship</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rand_paul_endorses_immigrant_path_to_citizenship_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rand_paul_endorses_immigrant_path_to_citizenship_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rand_paul_endorses_immigrant_path_to_citizenship_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["If you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you," he'll say in a Tuesday speech[UPDATE]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update – March 19, 1:15 p.m.:</strong> The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/19/rand-paul-advisers-say-he-didnt-back-faster-path-to-citizenship/">reports</a> that Rand Paul's office is pushing back on the story, releasing a statement saying, "The AP story was wrong, which spurred a lot of erroneous reports. He does not mention ‘path to citizenship’ in his speech at all.”</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is endorsing a pathway to citizenship for the nation's 11 million illegal immigrants, a significant move for a favorite of tea party Republicans who are sometimes hostile to such an approach.</p><p>In a speech to be delivered Tuesday morning to the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the potential 2016 presidential candidate declares, "If you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you." A copy of the speech was obtained in advance by The Associated Press.</p><p>Paul's path to citizenship would come with conditions that could make it long and difficult for illegal immigrants. Chief among these, Congress would have to agree first that progress was being made on border security.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rand_paul_endorses_immigrant_path_to_citizenship_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/rand_paul_endorses_immigrant_path_to_citizenship_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand, Ashley and Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Trey Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Derby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky used to be known for the Derby, UK basketball and bourbon. How did it become the center of U.S. politics?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, all it took for the rest of the country to notice Kentucky politics again was a Senate minority leader, a 13-hour filibuster and an actress-activist preparing for the role of candidate. Just like that, the Bluegrass State has emerged as the home base for some of the most interesting players -- and one of the most-discussed aspiring players – in Washington politics.</p><p>Sen. Mitch McConnell, in addition to being a fixture on the Sunday talk show circuit, leads a diverse Senate Republican caucus. Actress Ashley Judd continues to lay the groundwork for a potential run against McConnell in 2014, which has the national and state press abuzz. And the commonwealth’s junior senator, Rand Paul, just made a 13-hour splash on CSPAN-2 with his filibuster last week. And he’s a top contender for the GOP’s presidential nomination in 2016.</p><p>But this isn’t the result of some Kentucky machine churning out political superstars. “None of them came up in the traditional way. They didn’t come up through the Legislature. Even McConnell was sort of nobody’s protégé. He just kind of worked his way up,” said Trey Grayson, the former Kentucky secretary of state who is now director of the Harvard Institute of Politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kentucky bill could protect discrimination as &#8220;religious freedom&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/kentucky_bill_would_protect_discrimination_as_religious_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/kentucky_bill_would_protect_discrimination_as_religious_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Beshear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill advanced despite concerns that it would make it easier to discriminate against gays and lesbians]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The governor of Kentucky is considering a bill that would expand protections for religious freedom, but that in practice could give cover for discrimination against gays and lesbians.</p><p>The bill, which would give protections to people who refuse to follow state laws based on "sincerely held" religious beliefs, was sent to Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear after the state Senate approved it last Thursday. "Once we get it, we will review it and make some determination," Beshear said.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/03/11/185409/rights-groups-urge-kentucky-gov.html">Lexington Herald-Leader</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Opponents contend that the bill could be used to circumvent fairness ordinances approved by Lexington and three other Kentucky cities that ban discrimination against gay, lesbian and other populations not covered by federal civil rights laws.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/kentucky_bill_would_protect_discrimination_as_religious_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/kentucky_bill_would_protect_discrimination_as_religious_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A reality check for Ashley Judd</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What she's really up against, if she does run against Mitch McConnell in Kentucky. Inside the numbers and history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/09/ashley-judd-senate-run_n_2843852.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">report over the weekend suggested</a> that actress Ashley Judd has decided to challenge Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky next year. According to Howard Fineman, who once covered Kentucky politics and remains well-connected in the state, Judd already has a pollster, has been interviewing consultants and potential staffers, and is eyeing an official rollout around the Kentucky Derby, held annually on the first Saturday in May.</p><p>Because of her star power and because of the political power of the man she wants to unseat, Judd’s flirtation with the race has drawn considerable national attention, and the coverage will only intensify if she gets in. That has led Dave Weigel, among others, to <a href="https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/306541224750350338">argue</a> that the political world’s focus on Judd is misplaced – that her party label, liberal views and Hollywood background are all a poor match for an electorate that has become increasingly Republican over the last few decades.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Looks like Ashley Judd is running</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Derby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a period of speculation, the actress's allies say she will run against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/09/ashley-judd-senate-run_n_2843852.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">reports</a> that sources in Ashley Judd's camp say the 44 year-old actress is running for Senate in Kentucky against Senate Minority Leader and staunch Obama antagonist Mitch McConnell.</p><p>Reached via email, Judd</p><blockquote><p>...offered a not-quite-ironclad denial to The Huffington Post. “I am not sure who is saying this stuff, but it is not I! I’d prefer as a fan of your journalism that you stay accurate and credible. We told everyone who called us yesterday these stories are fabrications.”</p> <p>But she declined to specify which "stories,” did not say what wasn't "accurate,” and did not respond when asked directly whether she had, in fact, decided to run or chosen a time to declare her intentions.</p></blockquote><p>According to the piece, Judd plans to go public with her decision around the time of the Kentucky Derby when Kentuckyis in the media spotlight.</p><blockquote><p>Judd, sources say, is working with New York pollster Jefrey Pollock; has interviewed a number of media consultants including Anita Dunn, formerly of the Obama campaigns, and J.B. Poersch, the former head of the Democrats' national senate campaign committee, as well as leaders of Emily's List; and is lining up allies and field organizers.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans rally around Rand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/republicans_rally_around_rand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/republicans_rally_around_rand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Paul's filibuster of John Brennan's nomination to the CIA ended after almost 13 hours]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time he ended his nearly 13-hour filibuster around 1 a.m. Thursday morning, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., had turned his opposition to John Brennan's nomination to the CIA into a rallying point for Republicans.</p><p>From the <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/rand-paul-does-not-go-quietly-into-the-night/?hp">New York Times</a>:</p><blockquote><p>At a certain point, as the hour edged closer to midnight, participating in the filibuster seemed to become the gold standard among Senate Republicans, with a parade of Republican senators — Jeff Flake of Arizona; Ron Johnson of Wisconsin; Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader in the Senate; and Tim Scott of South Carolina — emerging for the first time to show their support for Mr. Paul’s cause, not to mention the C-SPAN cameras.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/republicans_rally_around_rand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/republicans_rally_around_rand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>