<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Could older moms cure menopause?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/could_older_moms_cure_menopause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/could_older_moms_cure_menopause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Menopause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's one possible implication of a new study, which also blames menopause on men]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists have long wondered why women's fertility declines after a certain age. Now researchers have a new theory: It's all men's fault. And over the long haul, older moms could have a solution.</p><p>Biologists Richard Morton, Jonathan Stone and Rami Singh have <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003092">created</a> a statistical model they say could explain how menopause evolved. If men choose to mate only with younger partners, Stone told Salon, this preference "allows mutations that otherwise would be removed by selection -- because the mutations cause negative effects like reduced fertility at older ages -- to accumulate in a population." Essentially, if women were all bearing children early in life, they were able to pass along these age-related mutations to their offspring -- they never got weeded out by natural selection. Over time, mutations conferring infertility may have built up in the population, leading to menopause for all women.</p><p>The study authors note that if women preferred to have kids with younger men, this trend would be reversed -- men, essentially, would go through menopause instead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/could_older_moms_cure_menopause/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/could_older_moms_cure_menopause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Stressed out dads have stressed out sperm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/study_stressed_out_dads_have_stressed_out_sperm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/study_stressed_out_dads_have_stressed_out_sperm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers discovered that stress creates an "epigenetic mark" in men's sperm which can affect their offspring ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in time for Father's Day: a study dedicated to understanding the neurodevelopmental link between man and child.</p><p>Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania have discovered that stress experienced by young and adult male mice leaves a genetic mark in sperm that can result in an unusually low reactivity to stress in their offspring.</p><p>A blunted stress response may sound like a good thing (it's like Klonopin from nature!), but can actually result in a series of irregular stress responses and related disorders, as the researchers note: "Whether such diminished stress reactivity would be detrimental or beneficial to offspring likely depends on the environment into which they were born, as well as genetic background factors."</p><p>In order to stress the male mice out, scientists moved them between cages, exposed them to fox urine (a natural mouse predator) and told them that 40 percent of female mice are now the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/nearly_40_percent_of_mothers_are_family_breadwinners/" target="_blank">primary breadwinners</a> for their mouse families, imperiling mouse society as they know it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/study_stressed_out_dads_have_stressed_out_sperm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/study_stressed_out_dads_have_stressed_out_sperm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megyn Kelly slams Erick Erickson, Lou Dobbs over sexist &#8220;breadwinners&#8221; comments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megyn Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loud dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Why should we take your word for it, Erick Erickson's science, instead of all of these experts?," Kelly asks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly slammed Lou Dobbs and Erick Erickson on Friday over the pundits' sexist (and entirely unsupported by decades of research) pronouncements about working mothers and the "decline" of the American family.</p><p>In a segment hosted by Dobbs on Wednesday, Erickson called female breadwinners "anti-science," "bad for kids and bad for marriage;" Dobbs later chimed in to say that the rise of female-headed households and single mothers are both "troubling" developments.</p><p>After sparring with Dobbs (who, in one of the video's most infuriating moments, condescendingly refers to Kelly as "Oh Dominant One"), Kelly moves on to Erickson, who she shreds for ignoring decades of research about working mothers in favor of his own conclusions about gender, work and parenting.</p><p>"Why should we take your word for it, Erick Erickson's science, instead of all of these experts?," Kelly asks.</p><p>Because scientists have an agenda, (total and utterly agendaless) Erickson replies.</p><p>Watch the full exchange below:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rbvSn0Vp4pE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/megyn_kelly_slams_erick_erickson_lou_dobbs_over_sexist_breadwinners_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the kiddie gun market</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The youth market in firearms is growing, selling air-light guns in pink and blue with names like "My First Rifle"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, a 5-year-old boy in Kentucky shot and <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/05/02/boy-shoots-sister-my-first-rifle/2128573/" target="_blank">killed his 2-year-old sister</a> with a .22-caliber, single-shot Crickett rifle. The boy had been playing with the gun, a recent birthday gift, when it went off. The Cumberland Country coroner described the tragic incident as “just one of those crazy accidents.”</p><p>The Crickett is a small, air-light firearm billed as "My First Rifle" by gun manufacturer Keystone Sporting Arms. It comes in pink and blue. It is a "training wheels" gun, part of the growing youth market in firearms.</p><p>As NBC News <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/03/.UYOffRsmui4.twitter" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/inside_the_kiddie_gun_market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Social networks play significant role in parents&#8217; decision to vaccinate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/study_social_networks_play_significant_role_in_parents_decision_to_vaccinate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/study_social_networks_play_significant_role_in_parents_decision_to_vaccinate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaccination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vaccination "naysayers" wielded the strongest influence over other parents, a finding that has the CDC concerned ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study found that an overwhelming majority of vaccination "naysayer" parents surveyed were influenced by friends, family and other non-medical peer recommendations when deciding whether or not to vaccinate their child, leading researchers to conclude that changing parents’ attitudes about vaccines may be a matter of influencing their influencers.</p><p>Researchers surveyed 196 parents of children 18 months or younger in a Seattle county with vaccination rates below the national average: 126 of these parents followed the national recommendations on childhood-vaccination from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), while 70 delayed vaccination, partially vaccinated or didn't vaccinate their child at all.</p><p>While both were informed by friends and family, peer influence in the vaccination "naysayer" group was a much bigger factor than in vaccine "conforming" circles, researchers found. Advice from social networks "blew any other variable out of the water” for vaccine doubters, Emily Brunson, who conducted the research as an anthropology graduate student at the University of Washington, <a href="http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/15/how-social-networks-influence-a-parents-decision-to-vaccinate/#ixzz2QXE7suY2" target="_blank">told</a> Time magazine. It “was more important in terms of predicting what parents decide to do than any other factor, including parents’ own opinions," she added.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/study_social_networks_play_significant_role_in_parents_decision_to_vaccinate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/study_social_networks_play_significant_role_in_parents_decision_to_vaccinate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even gay-friendly parents still assume their kids are straight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heteronormative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child-rearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why, in this day and age, do we still fantasize about opposite-sex prom dates and weddings for our children?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It started before our children were even born. My college roommate and I were pregnant with our first children at the same time -- down to the exact due date – and when we learned that I was having a girl and she was having a boy, we immediately began imagining our offspring's future together. No matter what else happened in their lives, at least the issue of a prom date, we both fancifully agreed, was settled.</p><p>Our children are both 13 now. They live in different towns and move about in different circles, and they will, when the time comes, pick their own damn prom dates. And though it should have been obvious back then -- especially for a gay-friendly, big city mom whose children would grow up going to pride parades with their lesbian aunts -- not every boy is going to go to the dance with a girl. Not every little princess dreams of marrying a prince. I had been talking about my children's world as a strictly heterosexual place while they were still in the womb, even though I knew it wasn't. But I'm trying to do better now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/even_gay_friendly_parents_still_assume_their_kids_are_straight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Tiger Mom&#8221; and her critics are both right about parenting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_tiger_mom_and_her_critics_are_both_right_about_parenting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_tiger_mom_and_her_critics_are_both_right_about_parenting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Mom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanford researchers find that it's relationships -- not parenting philosophy -- that matter most to kids' success]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yale Law professor and world-famous mean mommy Amy Chua made waves in 2011 with a Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704111504576059713528698754.html?mod=wsj_share_facebook" target="_blank">article</a> on her hyper-strict parenting style. The backlash to Chua's "Tiger Mom" manifesto was explosive, with critics accusing her of borderline abuse and hurting her daughters in her quest to make them succeed.</p><p>And so began the media battle between Chua and her critics, a debate that often broke down along "Eastern" versus "Western" parenting styles.</p><p>But a new study suggests a cease-fire could be on the way. Researchers at Stanford University found that it isn't the parenting philosophy that matters most to kid's success -- it's the family culture and strength of the parent-child relationship that really helps kids thrive.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.livescience.com/26465-tiger-parenting-cultural-style.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by LiveScience:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_tiger_mom_and_her_critics_are_both_right_about_parenting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/study_tiger_mom_and_her_critics_are_both_right_about_parenting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robot toddler could unlock secrets of human development</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/robot_toddler_could_unlock_secrets_of_human_development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/robot_toddler_could_unlock_secrets_of_human_development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncanny valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the uncanny valley: Watch as a humanoid robot mimics the expressions of a one-year-old child]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robotics, neuroscience, developmental psychology, and machine learning have converged in a new project led by University of California San Diego researchers. Meet Diego-san, a robotic one-year-old that "learns" to move and interact the same way a real baby does -- by watching you.</p><p>Besides bringing us <em>that </em>much closer to the uncanny valley, Diego-san is also providing a deeper understanding of sensory motor and social intelligence in children.</p><p>Diego-san stands about 4 feet 3 inches tall and weighs 66 pounds. Its body has a total of 44 pneumatic joints. Its eerily lifelike head contains around 27 moving parts. High definition cameras in his eyes allow him to "see" the world around it -- and the research team is developing algorithms that allow it to “learn” from cues like gestures, facial expressions and other movements. Just like a real baby.</p><p>As <a href="http://phys.org/news/2013-01-machine-perception-lab-reveals-robotic.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by science website Phys.org:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/robot_toddler_could_unlock_secrets_of_human_development/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/robot_toddler_could_unlock_secrets_of_human_development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mall cops harass breast-feeding moms for &#8220;exposing themselves&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/mall_cops_harass_breast_feeding_moms_for_exposing_themselves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/mall_cops_harass_breast_feeding_moms_for_exposing_themselves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's rghts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three Delaware moms were targeted by mall security -- and a Delaware state trooper -- for breast-feeding in public]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to a report that clothing retailer Hollister had asked a nursing mother to <a href="http://www.abc57.com/news/local/Hollister-stores-at-center-of-breastfeeding-controversary-185770082.html" target="_blank">leave</a> their Dallas, Texas store, three women staged a "nurse-in" at Delaware's Concord Mall in protest. Carrying posters that read, “Hey Hollister, my baby has a right to eat. It’s the law,” as well as “Normalize breastfeeding in public. Do you eat in public? Why shouldn’t our babies?”, the mothers each began breast-feeding their children inside the mall.</p><p>It wasn't long before security showed up. And they weren't exactly supportive. As <a href="http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/Moms-Claim-They-Were-Harassed-by-Security-for-Breastfeeding-at-Mall-185816772.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by NBC Philadelphia:</p><blockquote> <p id="paragraph5">“Two security guards walked up to us,” said Autumne Murray of Elkton, Maryland. “They started questioning us and asking us why we were exposing ourselves and saying that we needed to leave or cover up. We got in an argument with them about it for a little bit and then they left.”</p> <p id="paragraph6">When mall security returned, they brought along a Delaware State Trooper who was on routine patrol, according to state police.</p> <p id="paragraph7">“He was asking if we were exposing ourselves saying that the security guards said we were exposing ourselves and that we could be kicked out of the mall if we didn’t cover up,” said Murray.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/mall_cops_harass_breast_feeding_moms_for_exposing_themselves/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/mall_cops_harass_breast_feeding_moms_for_exposing_themselves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much is too much to share with kids?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the nation grieves with Newtown, many parents have started to restrict what their kids learn about Sandy Hook ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news out of Newtown, Conn., is heartbreaking. And there is a lot of it. As the nation continues to learn more about the victims and the terrible details of what happened inside Sandy Hook Elementary last week, many parents have begun to shield their kids from the information onslaught.</p><p>According to a <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/12/17/public-divided-over-what-newtown-signifies/">report</a> from the Pew Research Center, more than half of all parents polled have begun to restrict their children's news access in the wake of Friday's mass shooting.</p><blockquote><p>Fully 71 percent of parents with children in elementary school are trying to restrict how much coverage of the events their children watch, compared with only 36 percent of parents with older children. Six in ten parents (60 percent) with both elementary-school-age and older children are restricting how much coverage their children watch.</p></blockquote><p>Parents have long grappled with age-appropriate ways to talk with their children about grown-up tragedy, with a number of instructional <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=guide+to+talking+to+your+kid+about+sandy+hook&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">guides</a> offering suggestions. But the question remains: How much is too much information to share with your kids?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One million kids can&#8217;t be wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/send_our_kids_to_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/send_our_kids_to_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One million child march]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A protest galvanizes on Facebook and gives children a voice in the gun debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, the teachers and counselors in my children's schools – and no doubt yours as well – talked with our kids about the atrocity that happened in Newtown, Conn., on Friday morning. They held town meetings and class discussions; they answered questions and offered hope. It was a continuation of the heartbreaking conversations we parents engaged in all weekend long with our sons and daughters, as we struggled to find words to explain the most unexplainable horror. But as the initial shock and sadness of the shooting begin to subside and we move forward, we're going to choose how the tragedy will inform our lives. And we have a chance to not just console and reassure our kids, but to empower them.</p><p>Inspired by other <a href="http://photo2.si.edu/mmm/mmm.html">"millions" marches</a> of the past, a movement to hold <a href="https://www.facebook.com/1millionkidstoDC">a One Million Child march</a> on Washington in February to lobby for "sane" gun laws has sprouted up on Facebook. It's already garnered thousands of likes and RSVPs, because as the organizer, a father of two, asks, "Who could say no to a million kids? Not even Congress." Aside from the fact that Congress has a long and storied history of flipping the bird at kids, minorities, the elderly, the disabled — you get the point – the march has the potential to become a galvanizing moment not just in the debate over guns, but in the lives of thousands of families. It's an opportunity to teach kids the power of their voices, of their hope, of their love — and to show that power to the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/send_our_kids_to_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/send_our_kids_to_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parents divided on gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tragedy at Sandy Hook has hasn't sold all parents on gun control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's little surprise that parents are talking about gun control in the wake of the the mass shooting at Sandy Hook. What might shock you is where they come out on the issue. It seems that the death of 20 young children -- and six adults -- at the hands of gunman Adam Lanza has done little to persuade some parents that restricting access to guns is the answer. As <a title="NBC News gun control" href="http://www.today.com/moms/after-school-massacre-parents-divide-deepens-gun-control-1C7625058" target="_blank">NBC news reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Some parents turned their shock and grief into arguments for stricter gun laws, but others say it’s time to think seriously about protecting Second Amendment rights, and maybe even arm teachers so that adults can defend students against attacks like this.</p> <p>“I do feel that those kids would have been better protected, more lives would have been saved, if someone had had some type of weapon at the school,” says Jillian Mae Hagle, of Tahlequah, Okla., the mother of a 1-year-old.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Couple breaks up, sings about it, teaches us something</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/couple_breaks_up_sings_about_it_teaches_us_something/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/couple_breaks_up_sings_about_it_teaches_us_something/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[break up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could this couple's catchy tune be the "Call Me Maybe" of amicable, adult splits? Let's hope ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As people seem more and more inclined to document every part of their lives for public consumption, it's no surprise that twee (read: <em>nauseating</em>) proposal videos have become something of an Internet trend. What is surprising, even in this moment of overshare overload, is that a thoughtful and mature breakup video could become a YouTube hit. Though it probably doesn't hurt that it's also super twee.</p><p>Jonathan and Ivory have been in a relationship for five years. They love each other, a lot. Problem is: Jonathan wants kids. Ivory does not. After deciding that this wasn't something they could resolve as a couple, they break up. Amicably. With a lot of respect and compassion for one another. And when it comes time to tell their friends and family about it, they turn it into a song.</p><blockquote><p>And breaking up's a mess<br /> So please be there for us<br /> You don't have to choose<br /> Though it'll be awkward, yes<br /> Invite us to your parties<br /> We will work it out<br /> Don't feel weird<br /> We love all of you<br /> After 5 whole years<br /> By each other's side<br /> There are just some things<br /> No relationship can survive</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/couple_breaks_up_sings_about_it_teaches_us_something/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/couple_breaks_up_sings_about_it_teaches_us_something/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eighth grader takes on the Easy-Bake Oven</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy-bake oven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An eighth grader is petitioning Hasbro to start featuring boys in its ads for the mini-oven -- and ditch the pink]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey eighth grader McKenna Pope is sick and tired of hearing that baking is <em>girly</em>. She knows that male celebrity chefs like Jamie Oliver and Alton Brown are no strangers to perfectly flaky pie crust, and Pope's 4-year-old brother, Gavyn, is no slouch in the kitchen, either. So when he recently asked Santa for an Easy-Bake Oven, McKenna noticed that boys weren't featured anywhere in Hasbro's advertisements for the mini-oven. On top of that, it only came in two colors: purple and pink. Feeling burned by the suggestion that only girls bake, the budding activist decided to do something about it.</p><p>McKenna started a <a title="McKenna petition " href="http://www.change.org/petitions/hasbro-feature-boys-in-the-packaging-of-the-easy-bake-oven" target="_blank">petition</a> on Change.org calling on toy manufacturer Hasbro to tone down the gender-typing on the Easy-Bake Oven. The open letter to CEO Brian D. Goldner might feature a pretty adorable video of Gavyn talking about baking (and dinosaurs!), but it's not kidding around. In response to the frilly colorway for the oven, McKenna writes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/eighth_grader_takes_on_the_easy_bake_oven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your baby is killing your sex life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/your_baby_is_killing_your_sex_life_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/your_baby_is_killing_your_sex_life_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Norwegian study suggests your bundle of joy is a libido-killer ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author and noted provocateur Katie Roiphe gets a lot <a title="In Favor of Dirty Jokes and Risqué Remarks" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/opinion/sunday/sex-harassment-what-on-earth-is-that.html?_r=2&amp;" target="_blank">wrong</a> about sex, but scientists in Norway believe she has <a title="Why So Angry, Dad?" href="http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2011/06/why_so_angry_dad.html" target="_blank">one thing right</a>: Your baby <em>is</em> sapping your libido. A recent study finds that relationship satisfaction, including sexual satisfaction, takes a serious nosedive during the early stages of parenthood.</p><p>If parents in Norway, a country with a robust public infrastructure to support families, aren't happy, one shudders to think what American moms and dads are up against. Researchers at Texas A&amp;M University found that <a title="The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: an 8-year prospective study" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19254107" target="_blank">90 percent of new parents</a> reported a sudden deterioration in relationship and sexual functioning after having a baby, sudden -- but enduring. A majority of parents reported a persistent degree of unhappiness throughout the eight-year study, released in 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/your_baby_is_killing_your_sex_life_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/your_baby_is_killing_your_sex_life_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Gay and lesbian parents are perfectly average</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/study_gay_and_lesbian_parents_are_perfectly_average/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/study_gay_and_lesbian_parents_are_perfectly_average/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report finds that foster kids do just as well when paired with gay parents or straight parents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01176.x/full" target="_blank">report</a> out in the October issue of the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry finds that "high-risk" children adopted from foster care do just as well when matched with gay, lesbian or straight parents. Of the 82 foster children that psychologists at UCLA monitored for the study, 60 were placed with straight parents and 22 with gay or lesbian parents. After a two-year period of evaluation, the psychologists found little difference between the children's positive outcomes.</p><p>According to the study's lead author, <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121019094534.htm?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fmost_popular+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Most+Popular+News%29" target="_blank">doctoral candidate Justin Lavner</a>, "The children showed meaningful gains in heterosexual, gay and lesbian families. Their cognitive development improved substantially, while their behavior problems and social development were stable."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/study_gay_and_lesbian_parents_are_perfectly_average/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/study_gay_and_lesbian_parents_are_perfectly_average/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A kids club where parents die</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/a_kids_club_where_parents_die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/a_kids_club_where_parents_die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death and Dying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13027701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I got cancer, I put my kids in a support group. Then the death toll started rising]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first death came quickly. We got the news on a chilly November evening, soon after we’d started going to our weekly cancer club. I remember how a fellow member had tried to save a seat for Nelson, and how our facilitator told us that Nelson wasn’t returning. (His name, like that and the identifying details of all the group members and their children, has been changed.) His son Frankie, we learned, would be transitioning into the children’s bereavement group. I had wanted to give my daughters a place to feel safe while I was going through cancer. Now, as I clutched a sheet of paper with the details of a father’s memorial service, I wondered if I’d instead thrown them directly into the path of loss.</p><p>If you’re wondering why, in the darkest, scariest period in my family’s life, I got the bright idea to sign us up for a club where moms and dads die all time, the answer is: because I didn’t really think it through. I had joined the club, a support organization for people with cancer and their loved ones, at the recommendation of my friend Annie after <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/24/my_life_as_a_lab_rat/">I was diagnosed with stage-4 melanoma</a> last year. Annie had been the one who’d seen right through my flippant assertion that we were all doing “great,” and had suggested tenderly, “Maybe you need a place to sometimes be not great.” I made the call that day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/a_kids_club_where_parents_die/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/a_kids_club_where_parents_die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
